<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phacient</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.phacient.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.phacient.com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 08:34:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Being Logical in an Illogical World</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/being-logical-in-an-illogical-world/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/being-logical-in-an-illogical-world/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/being-logical-in-an-illogical-world/">Being Logical in an Illogical World</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>Sometimes you have to throw logic out the window. I have many conversations with people about their businesses. I try to keep things lighthearted and not get too too serious about any subject. Sadly, or fortunately depending on how you look at it, I don’t have any conversations where the outcome will truly affect the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/being-logical-in-an-illogical-world/">Being Logical in an Illogical World</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/being-logical-in-an-illogical-world/">Being Logical in an Illogical World</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<h2>Sometimes you have to throw logic out the window.</h2>
<h2><img decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Feeling confused? Things don't make sense? That's about right." src="https://www.phacient.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/1186848_53106054.jpg" alt="Confused" width="200" height="200" align="left" border="0" /></h2>
<p>I have many conversations with people about their businesses. I try to keep things lighthearted and not get too too serious about any subject. Sadly, or fortunately depending on how you look at it, I don’t have any conversations where the outcome will truly affect the world on a global scale – so I figure I’m approaching things in a healthy way. One tongue-in-cheek phrases I find myself saying time and time again when someone says that they don’t understand why their good idea isn’t being adopted or why their ideology is not the way most people think is, “well, you see, you’re thinking logically in an illogical world”. 19 out of 20 times I will at least get a smile out of them, and if I’m lucky, some added perspective to the conversation.</p>
<p>It’s gotten me thinking though, this joke is funny because it’s true. Why is this so? There are all sorts of questions we think about regularly that are too frustrating to warrant the time to really get to properly analyze.</p>
<ul>
<li>Why can’t we have a simplified tax code?</li>
<li>Why isn’t there a national MLS?</li>
<li>Why don’t teachers run our schools?</li>
<li>How does someone in the UAW get $25/hour to push a broom?</li>
<li>Why are banks reporting record earnings when much of the country is at it lowest economic point in a century?</li>
<li>Why would someone possibly pay <a title="Seriously?" href="http://business.time.com/2012/11/30/the-7-cup-of-starbucks-the-culmination-of-the-coffee-chains-long-term-strategy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">$7 for a latte</a> or $9 for a pint of craft beer?</li>
<li>Why do the Yankees seem to trade away all of their decent pitching prospects in exchange for has-beens?</li>
<li>Why can’t people let others out of an elevator <em>BEFORE</em> rushing on themselves?</li>
</ul>
<h2>Why</h2>
<p><img decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 10px 10px 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="We're all in this together, right?" src="https://www.phacient.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/479608_54799494.jpg" alt="You've got a deal" width="240" height="151" align="right" border="0" />I don’t think <em><strong>anyone</strong></em> will ever be able to answer these last three so I’ll continue to brood on those offline; but, the first five can very much be attributed to <em>politics</em>. Now, everyone knows politics occur in Washington but the fact is, the larger <em>ANY</em> organization gets the more politics are involved. This should be fairly obvious. The Webster dictionary defines politics a <a title="I won't bore you with all of it, you can do that yourself" href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/politics" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">few ways</a> but the one I think most apropos is this one:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Lucida Bright';">Political affairs or business; especially : competition between competing interest groups or individuals for power and leadership (as in a government)</span></em></p></blockquote>
<h3>I would distill that down to a very simple phrase: <em>People want what they want.</em></h3>
<p>The IRS doesn’t want a simple tax code because there are jobs and money invested in it being more complex. Think of all the auditors that would be unemployed if we all just paid 25% of our gross income to Uncle Sam. NAR doesn’t want a national MLS because MLSs generate revenue for them. More MLSs (over 900 of them I believe) means more memberships, more boards, and more money that goes to NAR. Confusion in our education system means that taxes are more easily justifiable and fear keeps parents in line. <a title="Gotta love this." href="https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/04/politics-and-education-dont-mix/256303/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Politicians also love the subject</a> when it comes to getting votes based on emotion. Unions don’t give anything back because if they set that precedent they may lose membership and that means less union dues collected. Banks are in the business of making money – literally. Unsuccessful banks serve as food for the successful ones. When citizens are late on their bills (like in a bad economy) banks make out big on interest and late fees which are astronomical when you consider the term of the loan. A bad economy is great for banks.</p>
<h2>You’re depressing me, Patrick</h2>
<p><img decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 20px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="There's no reason to be sad" src="https://www.phacient.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/1158071_69139095.jpg" alt="Sad Guy" width="113" height="150" align="left" border="0" />I don’t intend to make this a doom and gloom piece or a politically charged rant. Actually, it’s quite the contrary. You practice politics too &#8211; every time you post one of those <a title="Everyone loves a good meme" href="https://plus.google.com/browser-not-supported/?ref=/%2BPhacient/posts/ZhXKs6LBeQW" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">silly memes</a> up on your favorite social network, get involved with a discussion on the rights of any group, or refuse to buy a product because you feel the company does something you don’t like. We <em><strong>all</strong></em> do it.  The point I am making here is that it’s human nature and it’s never going to go away. UNDERSTANDING THAT LAST SENTENCE IS THE POINT OF THIS POST. Once you get there you can move forward and make it work for you. Sometimes well, sometimes <em>very</em> well. Logic, regardless of how solid, does not always apply to business partially because <a title="This shouldn't surprise you" href="https://truthout.org/articles/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-free-market/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">there is no free market</a> and partially because we are a flawed species (not always a bad thing).</p>
<h2>What does this mean to your business?</h2>
<p>Simply put, pay attention and get over it. Understanding those politics can save you a ton of heartache and money. The IRS isn’t going anywhere anytime soon so get yourself a good accountant and make sure you stay within reason when pushing the envelope. IMO owing a small tax bill at the end of the year is better than getting a big refund. NAR is never going to put together a national MLS so understand the big players and their similarities/differences when it comes to interacting with them. If you are a vendor stay away from geographically fragmented markets if what you do is labor intensive and custom. Banks want your money so be smart about borrowing from them – and how you pay it back. Interest and late charges are the most insidious and high margin transactions they do. Clear the credit card balance every month unless you are going to make more money off of that cash than they will off of you for not paying it – <em>this is highly unlikely BTW</em>.</p>
<p>And for God sake, get a 99¢ cup of coffee like the rest of the world!  I’m sorry, paying that much is just silly.</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/being-logical-in-an-illogical-world/">Being Logical in an Illogical World</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/being-logical-in-an-illogical-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday Google+ &#8211; 17 Interesting G+ Facts</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/17-interesting-googleplus-facts/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/17-interesting-googleplus-facts/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googleplus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/17-interesting-googleplus-facts/">Happy Birthday Google+ &ndash; 17 Interesting G+ Facts</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>So Google+ turns a year old. 17 interesting things you should know. So after a short writing hiatus due to moving, work, and life I figure it’s appropriate to break my fast by writing about a subject very near and dear to my heart – Google+. As I sit here and write this on the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/17-interesting-googleplus-facts/">Happy Birthday Google+ &ndash; 17 Interesting G+ Facts</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/17-interesting-googleplus-facts/">Happy Birthday Google+ &ndash; 17 Interesting G+ Facts</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<h2>So Google+ turns a year old. 17 interesting things you should know.</h2>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Happy Birthday Google+" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Happy-Birthday-Google_7D08/Google1Birthday.png" alt="Happy Birthday Google+" width="131" height="166" align="left" border="0"></p>
<p>So after a short writing hiatus due to moving, work, and life I figure it’s appropriate to break my fast by writing about a subject very near and dear to my heart – Google+.</p>
<p>As I sit here and write this on the eve of <strong><em>Google+’s</em></strong> <strong><em>FIRST BIRTHDAY,</em></strong> I am overwhelmed by lots of different feelings. It took me off-guard since I can remember getting my beta invitation like it was yesterday.</p>
<p>And also as I write this, I am receiving invite after invite from the brand new Events functionality that was just released poetically on the first day of <a title="BTW, they are streaming this conference live if you want to tune in for an education." href="https://events.google.com/io2015/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google I/O</a>. It really makes me wonder why they only have 170 million users. I would think it would be much more by now. I suspect that people are a little burned out on social networks but I think with the new things Google has going on that’s about to change. You see, Google+ is no ordinary social network. Actually, I am not sure I would put it in the same category as anything else that’s out there.</p>
<p>Here’s a recap of some notable milestones and announcements that anyone who is on or considering being on the platform should find interesting:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Stuff that other networks have &#8216;’borrowed”</h3>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Everything goes in circles</span></h4>
<p>The biggest difference between Google+ and Facebook is that with G+ everything is private unless you decide otherwise. Facebook has been the polar opposite historically. Circles makes it easy to expose content to others. Facebook has always had lists but they have recently stepped up their game and pushed the notion of content permissioning. My theory for not doing this sooner: things are hard enough to find on Facebook since there is really no functional search to speak of so they don’t want to compound that problem. Google has forced them to play their game.</p>
<h4><strong>Size Matters</strong></h4>
<p>A great thing about G+ is that you can follow someone without them following you back – much like Twitter. The challenge of Twitter is of course the 140 characters. Even Facebook originally limited you to 160 characters and have been <a title="What? 160 characters isn't enough?" href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-increases-status-update-character-limit-to-63206/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">bumping it</a> up for some time. They are now at over 60,000. This was because of G+. Before the Google platform came out, Facebook limited you to 420. Clearly Google was on to something and Facebook had to keep up. Theoretically, Google+ can become your blog since it <a title="If you can't say it in 100K characters, maybe you should split it up." href="https://techcrunch.com/2011/11/30/status-update-character-limit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">currently caps</a> you at 100,000.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Everyone Fatfingers a Key from Time to Time</span></h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Who hasen't fatfingered a text?" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Happy-Birthday-Google_7D08/1307593_87254838.jpg" alt="Who hasen't fatfingered a text?" width="174" height="160" align="right" border="0">How many times have you posted something on the web only to realize that it had a spelling error? I fatfinger things all the time when I’m mobile. On G+ you simply edit the post and it tells the world you cared enough to correct yourself. Guess what Facebook did last week? Yeah, you can do that now. I’ve heard rumors that you can only do it for a limited amount of time after you post but I can neither confirm nor disprove that.</p>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Stuff that other networks can’t/won’t do</h3>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Transparent Privacy Policy </span></h4>
<p>You can read it <strong><a title="Google's Privacy Policy - the whole thing" href="http://www.google.com/policies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a></strong>. If this isn’t simple enough for you then I don’t have the energy to explain or debate it. If you like, you can take some time out of your day and read <a title="You must be kidding me." href="https://www.facebook.com/about/privacy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Facebook’s privacy policy</a>. I hope you have an advanced degree.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Hangouts</span></h4>
<p>I was going to list this in the previous section since Facebook does now support video chat but I wouldn’t want to sully the Hangout by comparing the two. I’ve never been able to get it to work and don’t know anyone who uses it. I think it’s more of a one-on-one thing. Hangouts are just so much better. Video conference with multiple people and it really is appropriately named; <em><strong>you really are hanging out</strong></em>. You can watch videos, chat, share screens, digitally add a hat and moustache to yourself just for kicks. If you haven’t tried it, seriously, try it.</p>
<h4><strong>Hangouts Over Air (HOA)</strong></h4>
<p>Did I mention that you can broadcast these hangouts live to the world so that anyone, anywhere can watch them? And it saves them to your YouTube account? It must have slipped my mind. Sorry, I must have been distracted by planning <em>The Patrick Healy Show</em>.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Picasa integration</span></h4>
<p>For the longest time there has been this ‘look down your nose attitude&#8217; toward Picasa – Google’s photo platform. People are all, “It’s not as good as Flickr.” I got news for you all, Flickr isn’t as good as Flickr. Since Yahoo bought them, they have been <a title="I wish Yahoo would just stop kiling good companies they buy." href="https://gizmodo.com/how-yahoo-killed-flickr-and-lost-the-internet-5910223" target="_blank" rel="noopener">systematically destroying it</a> with bureaucracy. It’s best attribute was it’s community and it’s social aspect. Both are now all but gone. Picasa is your best option. Oh, and with <a title="Yes, even for Apple." href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/250036/google_iphone_app_gets_instant_photo_upload_feature.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">instant upload</a> you can have your pictures backed up to your G+ account instantly so you will never lose them – ever. And it’s unlimited storage space. And there is a local Picasa client that you can install on your computer that will enable you to sync all of these photos to that computer just in case you <a title="If they are showing you the ins and outs of it, then they can't be that worried about it not working." href="https://www.cnet.com/news/google-uncloaks-once-secret-server-10209580/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">don’t trust Google’s servers</a>. And, oh yeah, Facebook’s photo management is abysmal at best. Seriously, if the <a title="Photographers usually are pretty weird about privacy and IP issues. If they are ok with Google's privacy policy then it's probably alright for you." href="https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/11/16763544/google-appsperiments-storyboard-selfissimo-scrubbies-apps-photography-motion-stills" target="_blank" rel="noopener">photographers are all flocking to G+</a> solely for Picasa why aren’t you?</p>
<h4><strong>Google+ will let you juggle more accounts</strong></h4>
<p>You can keep your personal profile open in one tab and each of your pages in other tabs = easier to manage your stuff. Try that with any other network. You can’t.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Better SEO</span></h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 20px 15px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="It's all about getting it out there right?" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Happy-Birthday-Google_7D08/1287371_51772475_thumb.jpg" alt="It's all about getting it out there right?" width="186" height="185" align="left" border="0">With Google.com turning more toward <a title="Getting search results based on what your network thinks is good is better than any algorithm." href="https://www.phacient.com/google-is-not-evil-how-search-is-changing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">social search</a> and authorship and weighing G+ content heavier, they have effectively done something brilliant, IMO. Google has armed the average person with great tools to get their great content on page one of Google.com – essentially creating an unlimited army to combat SEO agencies and make it harder for them to game the algorithm. Good luck beating everyone guys.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;"> <br clear="all">Ability to do simple formatting of posts</span></h4>
<p>This is so fundamental that I think Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn should be metaphorically slapped by anyone who uses social networks. Maybe it will take the form of attrition. Throw us a bone guys. We aren’t asking <a title="This will be a V8 moment for you once you try it." href="https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">for much</a> here.</p>
<h4><strong>You can ditch your blog – if you want to</strong></h4>
<p>Given that Google owns Blogger, this may be a bold statement but considering you can put photos and video and good content (although you can only dress it up with the tips above) this <strong><em>could</em></strong> really be the platform you choose to start blogging on if you already haven’t. OR it could be the one you move to if you are tired of what a hosted solution costs you in time and money. Facebook Notes just don’t cut it.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Non-member participation</span></h4>
<p>You don’t have to be on Google+ to enjoy Google+. When you share content, as long as it’s public or you need the given link to view it, you have the option to alert and send it to those that don’t have accounts – they just happen to be in your circles without a Google+ account. I’ve seen surprising conversion to this platform based on this alone. Once you get people on there through that link it’s easy to sign up with the intention of just using it for that purpose (i.e., just to see my cousin’s pictures). This is how they get you. <img decoding="async" class="wlEmoticon wlEmoticon-smile" style="border-style: none;" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Happy-Birthday-Google_7D08/wlEmoticon-smile.png" alt="Smile"></p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Local</span></h4>
<p>Google Places and all those local businesses have been rolled up into the Local tab in G+ and guess what, all <a title="Go claim your Google+ business page now and start talking with your customers." href="https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">businesses now have a page</a> they can go claim. This page <strong><em>could</em></strong> be what you use for a website if you don’t already have one. It gives you the ability to talk to your customers, see what they are saying about you, and share what your business does and has to offer. And once again, it’s free. Ever see what a Facebook place page looks like? No wonder they ask you to create a business page for yourself. Too bad only 10-12% of your fans will see your posts.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Google Events</span></h4>
<p>So today they launched an Events tab in Google+. Once again, you can invite anyone in your circles (G+ account holder or not) to your events. You can allow your guests to upload photos and video instantly at the event through “Party Mode” and even make your in-person event into a HOA. It also integrates seamlessly with your Google calendar so you will never miss an event again. If they start processing transactions and allow ticket sales through Google Checkout, companies like Eventbrite are in trouble. Again, have you seen what Facebook offers here? Snooze…….</p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>What’s Next?</h3>
<p>So what’s coming down the pipe? As if this all isn’t enough. Well, it’s hard to say but since this week is the I/O Conference, there are already a few topics that seem to be hot. Here&#8217;s what I speculate what will be up next for Google+:</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">More Stuff</span></h4>
<p>Blogger (as I alluded to above), WDYL (What Do You Love), and other products more deeply integrated into the platform is a reasonable prediction. Like I said, Google+ really isn’t your run-of-the-mill platform. It’s a true content platform. It essentially allows you to take many of the services you use by Google and serve them up the way you want, dynamically, in one place. Photos, Videos, Business Directories, and written content are just the beginning. Looking at each of these as a stream you can mix and match to create your own personal content cocktail.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Device Integration/Mobile Domination</span></h4>
<p>Instant upload and Hangouts are phase one. Look for your music via the Play Store to become more seamless. I can see all of my photos on my phone the second they are uploaded from my computer and vice versa. The seamless experience between your computer, tablet, and phone are eminent. It’s what people want and Google is doing it. Look for more of it.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Project Glass (aka Google Glasses)</span></h4>
<p>Eventually, you will not be nearly as dependent on your phone. This subject has been a big one in the industry and is much bigger than Google+. This is what Google <a title="Maybe we are becoming more cyborg than we want to admit." href="https://techcrunch.com/2012/06/27/google-glass-future/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">is betting on</a> –&nbsp; BIG – with Glass. The way we interface with devices and each other is changing. At the I/O today, <a title="He's kind of a big deal." href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Brin" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sergey Brin</a> orchestrated a very cool demonstration of one way in which Google thinks we will be interfacing with one another. You should watch this. It will put things in perspective as to a) why Google+ is different and b) how different our lives will soon be.</p>
<div id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:887cf960-8762-4d55-abed-8628c238bae3" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" style="margin: 0px auto; width: 524px; display: block; float: none; padding: 10px 0px 20px 0px;">
<div id="bd0e58cb-8e7d-4bf8-8f15-7a27af2c6a6d" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;">
<div><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7TB8b2t3QE" target="_new" rel="noopener"><img decoding="async" style="border-style: none;" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Happy-Birthday-Google_7D08/videoef6d6ce16ec3.jpg" alt=""></a></div>
</div>
<div style="width: 524px; clear: both; font-size: .8em;">Google Glasses seem like something out of a Sci-Fi movie – but they are not</div>
</div>
<h3 align="left"></h3>
<h3 align="left">What does this mean to your business?</h3>
<p>Well, for one, check out Google+. It’s going to be a way for you to connect with your customers better and it’s only going to improve as time goes on. Get in now and learn it. There is a ton more on the way and it will be harder the later you get in. Also, you may find that there are better ways for your organization to collaborate internally and with third parties. If you enjoyed that video then you can probably speculate that there is going to be better, more direct ways to connect with customers right around the corner as well. It’s an exciting time for business. Are you ready to evolve?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/17-interesting-googleplus-facts/">Happy Birthday Google+ &ndash; 17 Interesting G+ Facts</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/17-interesting-googleplus-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Do You Want to be on Page One of Google?</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/why-do-you-want-to-be-on-page-one-of-google/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/why-do-you-want-to-be-on-page-one-of-google/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlogWorld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-do-you-want-to-be-on-page-one-of-google/">Why Do You Want to be on Page One of Google?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>Last week I was lucky enough to attend Blog World and New Media Expo. As the name (or former name) alludes, there is a strong and almost exclusive focus on content. Just about every session I sat in had some mention of SEO. The timing of the conference couldn’t have been better since I’ve gotten [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-do-you-want-to-be-on-page-one-of-google/">Why Do You Want to be on Page One of Google?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-do-you-want-to-be-on-page-one-of-google/">Why Do You Want to be on Page One of Google?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Do you even know WHY you want to be ranked by Google?" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/The-Question-You-Should-Ask-Yourself-Abo_14704/1105359_86180637.jpg" alt="search bar" width="203" height="203" align="left" border="0">Last week I was lucky enough to attend <a title="They actually changed theit name during the conference. Wild, eh?" href="http://nmxlive.com/2016-lv/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Blog World and</span> New Media Expo</strong></a>. As the name (or former name) alludes, there is a strong and almost exclusive focus on content. Just about every session I sat in had some mention of <a title="If you need to click on this link then this article won't be very interesting for you." href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SEO</a>. The timing of the conference couldn’t have been better since I’ve gotten a number of questions recently about folks I know wanting to be on page one of Google.com. Everyone seems to want to be on page one for some great phrase like “real estate”, “New York City Restaurant” or “small business solutions”. For many, it’s a dream. For almost all, an impossibility – particularly with the introduction of the <a title="Panda has taken a huge bite out of the SEO business" href="https://www.phacient.com/is-the-seo-business-dying/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Panda</a> update. Still there are folks that pay hundreds, sometimes <strong><em>THOUSANDS</em></strong>, of dollars a month to have a firm do their best to get their site up on that page as high as possible. To all of you, I ask this question:</p>
<h2>Why do you want to be on page one of Google?</h2>
<h4>Buy Organic</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="This is VERY expensive" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/The-Question-You-Should-Ask-Yourself-Abo_14704/1237498_73106875.jpg" alt="Dollars Funnel" width="187" height="191" align="right" border="0">It may sound like a silly question but stop and think about it for a second? Why? Really? Is it for the perceived traffic benefits that you think you will get or is it prestige? If it’s ego then I advise you to keep on striving to be number one. Pay the money and feel good about it. This is clearly something you have put a lot of thought into. Just curious, how many leads did you get with those efforts? How many converted? How many closed? I’m betting not enough to justify what you are spending. In your case, this accomplishment is akin to a Fabergé egg – you just want it.</p>
<h4>Buy Keywords</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="This is expensive but not nearly as involved - if you just want leads" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/The-Question-You-Should-Ask-Yourself-Abo_14704/1317230_29811116.jpg" alt="Money" width="136" height="136" align="left" border="0">If you want people to find your business and be part of their short list of choices then you have to do some more thinking. Consider the amount of money you are spending to do that and consider what it would cost you to just buy the Google AdWords? The result is the same and you don’t have to kill yourself with keyword analysis and development tricks to make your site as appealing to Google as possible. You can create a very specific AdWords campaign and target very specific searches. Theoretically, you could target “chocolate cake” and “Upper West Side Real Estate” with the same site. To be honest, this would probably have lousy bounce rates but you <strong><em>could</em></strong> do it. Something to keep in mind with this strategy is that buying Google keywords will only work for Google and not for other <a title="According to comScore over a third of all searched on the web are NOT done on Google." href="https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2012/2/comScore-Releases-January-2012-US-Search-Engine-Rankings" target="_blank" rel="noopener">search engines</a>.</p>
<h4>Create Organic</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="It's not easy but it works" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/The-Question-You-Should-Ask-Yourself-Abo_14704/1338212_30238506.jpg" alt="Writing good content" width="179" height="177" align="right" border="0">Lastly, you could employ a custom content strategy infused with backlinks, social search optimization, and cross site content promotion. This is clearly more labor intensive but you are not pulling money out of your pocket per se and you own that content. It lives on your site and can continue to pay dividends as well as give you great link fodder for wherever you write.&nbsp; You may find you really like to create this content and <strong><em>that</em></strong> in itself is part of the value it&nbsp; brings to you. This is the strategy for people that tend to frequent the New Media Expo. It’s no wonder since they tend to be startups and personal bloggers that don’t have the budget to do either of the first two strategies but that’s not the only reason. A few other reasons are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Writing gives you a chance to showcase your brains and those of your firm – credibly</li>
<li>Writing gives you an excuse to share research you’ve done so that others can benefit from your experience. This makes you valuable.</li>
<li><a title="Erik Deckers lays things out clearly when it comes to writing" href="http://problogservice.com/2012/06/11/making-the-case-for-writing-every-day-a-blogchat-response/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Writing chronically</a> makes you a better writer. This seems elementary but being a good writer <a title="Writing is kinda important in business" href="https://smallbusiness.chron.com/importance-writing-skills-business-845.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">comes in handy</a> in lots of other places in business.</li>
<li>Rarely is someone invited to speak at a conference to share their personal keyword purchasing method</li>
</ul>
<h4>What does this mean to your business?</h4>
<p>If you are like many businesses, most of your leads aren’t coming off the web. If they are, bravo – but you are in a small minority. When was the last time someone called your office and told you they found you via search? I’m not trying to dissuade you from using an SEO or AdWord strategy. Actually, it’s quite the opposite. If it’s working for your business use it. Heck, double down if you can measure the ROI. If you are going to pursue an SEO strategy I recommend you do it by creating killer content that makes people think and encourages them want to share it. Just keep in mind that there are lots of other ways to make sure people know about your business and the value you can bring them. The most powerful is free – word of mouth. You get that by doing right by enough people that have voices and are willing to use them. A great way to generate word of mouth is through people talking about your writing. It gets you a third party endorsement <strong><em>and</em></strong> gives those fans something to talk about. After all, we <strong><em>ALL</em></strong> need content right? Without it we are just a bunch of people sitting around looking at one another.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><strong>NOTE</strong>: I want to personally thank </em><a title="Erik has probably forgotten more about writing than most people will ever learn." href="https://laughing-stalk.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Erik Deckers</em></a><em> for giving me a reality check last week in his </em><a title="This may have been the best session I attended at this conference." href="http://blogworldexpo.wpengine.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>session on writing secrets</em></a><em> at Blog World. He reaffirmed my faith in that I am doing right by my readers and myself. I am going to be writing more frequently in an effort to create better content. This post is dedicated to him.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-do-you-want-to-be-on-page-one-of-google/">Why Do You Want to be on Page One of Google?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/why-do-you-want-to-be-on-page-one-of-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Advertising: Pay for Your Facebook Page? Google Places Moves into Google+</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googleplus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/">Social Advertising: Pay for Your Facebook Page? Google Places Moves into Google+</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>So some pretty interesting things happened this week in terms of social media, user experience and advertising. After taking much of this activity in, I’ve made some realizations. I was reading a very thought provoking post by David Berkowitz where he asks the question, “Is Social Advertising Broken?”. I’ve thought for some time that Facebook [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/">Social Advertising: Pay for Your Facebook Page? Google Places Moves into Google+</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/">Social Advertising: Pay for Your Facebook Page? Google Places Moves into Google+</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 20px 15px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="With all these new changes to Facebook, is it time for a change?" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a71bc8fdb50c_143F4/Google_or_Facebook.png" alt="Google_or_Facebook" width="200" height="200" align="left" border="0">So some pretty interesting things happened this week in terms of social media, user experience and advertising. After taking much of this activity in, I’ve made some realizations. I was reading a very thought provoking post by David Berkowitz where he asks the question, “<a title="David reall got me thinking" href="https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/175724/is-social-advertising-broken.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Is Social Advertising Broken?</a>”. I’ve thought for some time that Facebook in particular seems to have a very broken advertising model. The one thing that I took away from it is that social advertising is almost five years old and even Facebook doesn’t have a good handle on it – and it matters more to them than anyone. This is probably not news to you but read on.</p>
<h4><br clear="all">Paying to Make Sure My Fans See My Content?</h4>
<p>Then I was involved in a conversation today with Mike Mueller and some folks talking about a new spin on <a title="Mike's a sharp guy. I like his FB stuff." href="https://areweconnected.com/pages/do-owners-have-pay-engage-fans/?utm_source=phacient&amp;utm_campaign=link-love&amp;utm_medium=backlink&amp;utm_content=social%20advertising%3A%20pay%20to%20play%3F" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Facebook advertising</a>. Recently, Facebook has started promoting advertisers’ content through “<a title="I wrote about this a few weeks back" href="https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trending Articles</a>”. Well, now they are giving business page owners the option to “Promote” specific posts from their pages – for a fee. Here’s a page they released to explain this a bit. In typical Facebook form, they really weren’t super clear about how this new program affects their current EdgeRank (the algorithm they use to serve up your content in your connections’ newsfeeds based on a variety of events). Currently, if you ‘like’ a page, it means that you want to see everything that that page shares on their wall – in your news feed. Whether or not you are there to see it at the time is another story. However, theoretically, if I only had a handful of friends and liked a handful of pages it would be relatively easy for me to see everything they all shared in my news feed as long as I have it sorted by most recent posts. This leads me to believe that, as things stand now, I can potentially expose my content to everyone that likes my page. Facebook says that these promoted posts will appear on your fans’ timelines on desktop and mobile. I would imagine they are saying this for a reason. It begs the question: “Will this new program effectively be suppressing my content from my current fans?”</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 10px 10px 30px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Don't be surprised, we all saw this coming....." src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a71bc8fdb50c_143F4/facebook_moneygrab.png" alt="facebook_moneygrab" width="200" height="200" align="right" border="0">This is a dangerous question to answer. If the answer is ‘no’ then the value proposition for promoting posts through advertising dollars is to hope to have that post stay on peoples’ news feeds longer and garner more comments. I’d imagine that this would be rendered useless if you are like me and sort your news feed by most recent. Not good for Facebook. More interesting – and dangerous – is if the answer is ‘yes’. If you are going to start to suppress my content to my fans who have essentially opted in to see that content by liking my page, you are severely reducing the value of my setting up a “free” page on Facebook. Mike&#8217;s sources estimate that about 10% of people see your content when you share it on your Facebook page. I suspect that’s just because not everyone is sitting in front of their computer waiting for you to post something (page or personal status update). Suppressing content to an even greater degree would really make the page fairly useless. Essentially you will be forcing people with these “free” pages to spend advertising dollars to have the pages function somewhat like they used to.</p>
<h4><br clear="all">Can Facebook Afford to Play Games with Their Fan Base?</h4>
<p>I think this will really hurt Facebook’s odds of bumping up their already disappointing share price. It’s <a title="I don't think this is much of a surprise to anyone." href="https://www.forbes.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">no secret</a> that the company has lost a ton of its value since the IPO. Facebook may not care since they were forced to go public due to their legal status of having a certain number of investors. What they do care about is keeping their user base intact. This action will discourage many to either take down their pages, abandon them, or move to another platform.&nbsp; Driving page owners off of Facebook will also drive the actual users who own those pages away from the platform as well – their user base. The less people you know on Facebook, the less time you spend on Facebook and the more likely you will be to move from Facebook to where those people are going. Social Networking is very momentum driven. Just like in 2006 when Facebook was Nowheresville and MySpace was all the rage, by 2007 it was catching fire and by 2008 it was the big dog on the block. Now, none of this matters if you don’t have anywhere else to go but….</p>
<h4>You do</h4>
<p><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a71bc8fdb50c_143F4/LaMelaMap.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="You used to get this when you searched a map - and this was pretty good....." src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a71bc8fdb50c_143F4/LaMelaMap_thumb.png" alt="LaMelaMap" width="318" height="200" align="left" border="0"></a>Google+ just rolled out a <a title="This is pretty big" href="https://searchengineland.com/google-places-is-over-company-makes-google-the-center-of-gravity-for-local-search-122770" target="_blank" rel="noopener">new program</a> yesterday that will really appeal to any business owner that has a physical location. Google Places is a program that Google rolled out some time ago and has built into Google Maps. It will allow you to claim your business and keep its records up to date as well as see first hand when people review you or add pictures – essentially reputation management meets directory assistance on a map level. It’s pretty great and I have recommended any client I have to make sure they get their business on Google Places and keep it current. It’s like free advertising for your business on the best map search in the world. <em>Why wouldn’t you do this?</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a71bc8fdb50c_143F4/LaMelaG.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 10px 20px 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="......And now when you click 'more info' you get this - your very own Google+ page that you control." src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a71bc8fdb50c_143F4/LaMelaG_thumb.png" alt="LaMelaG " width="333" height="200" align="right" border="0"></a>But now Google has sweetened the deal. They have fully integrated those Places that you have all been working so hard to maintain right into a <a title="This will give you an idea of all of the cool things you can do with this new feature." href="https://www.hivedigital.com/2012/05/30/google-local-full-integration-of-google-places-into-google-plus/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">‘Local’ tab right in Google+.</a> If you are not smiling right now you should be. You see, not only does this give end users a much easier way to post reviews of your business – which helps your organic SEO like crazy – but it also has created you a default Google+ Business Page that has content already built in! Photos, reviews, company information are all already there. All you have to do is claim it and now it’s yours. What’s more is that now people have the ability to +1 your page. This, in my opinion, may be the best part of the deal. I’m not going to rehash the benefits of +1’s and social search. You can read that <a title="Social search is the future of search" href="https://www.phacient.com/google-is-not-evil-how-search-is-changing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a> but what I will say is that making it easier for people who love your business to show that (+1) will make it easier for people who are looking for a place their friends love to find it. This move basically makes your page a one stop shop for information about your business and people will get there from any number of original locations. All roads lead to <strong><em>your</em></strong> page.</p>
<h4>What does this mean to your business?</h4>
<p>Well for one, you’d better get moving and go claim your business. If it’s not up in Google Places you’d better add it and claim it. Then you’d better make sure all the info is right, read all the reviews and pictures to make sure they all look good. While there’s nothing you can do about the bad reviews, you now have the ability to reach out to those people to make things right. Boy, do I wish everywhere I ever worked had the opportunity to try and make things right with their disgruntled customers.</p>
<p>Now, you will want to upload some more content such as videos, pictures and written text. You should also put some sort of promotion and maybe even a virtual tour of your place. Check out a few good examples of what is possible with your new page.&nbsp; Here are some very nice pages that<strong><em> I found in the Google+ local tab</em></strong>. These pages have not been claimed at the time of this post so <strong><em><span style="color: #ff0000;">NOTHING</span> </em></strong>has been done to them – yet. They look good right from the beginning. I would be very interested as to how much better they will look once their marketing people get their hands on them:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="High end restaurant where you can makes reservatons from the page with OpenTable – with Zagat reviews bult in" href="https://plus.google.com/browser-not-supported/?ref=/%2BRussiantearoomnyc" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Russian Tea Room</a></li>
<li><a title="Time Square Hotel where you can book reservations with one click - on the page." href="https://plus.google.com/browser-not-supported/?ref=/109767350790162734395" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Stay. Hotel</a></li>
<li><a title="IMO, the best pizza on the planet" href="https://plus.google.com/browser-not-supported/?ref=/%2BJoesPizzaNewYork" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Joe&#8217;s Pizza</a></li>
<li><a title="Get a real feel for a music venue - video is in the future of this page for sure" href="https://plus.google.com/browser-not-supported/?ref=/106166551351965450983" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Blue Note Jazz Club</a></li>
<li><a title="A little known school here in New York" href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;oi=plus&amp;q=https://www.google.com/maps/place/Columbia%2BUniversity/data%3D!4m2!3m1!1s0x89c2f63e96d30dc9:0x577933f947e52750?gl%3DUS%26hl%3Den-US&amp;authuser" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Columbia University</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Now this doesn’t mean you have to abandon your Facebook page or strategy. You will however have to do some more research and see if spending the money to get your content in front of someone you once didn’t is justifiable. When it was completely free, was it ringing your cash register in any way? If not, maybe you don’t spend the money. If that’s the case, be prepared for lower engagement and traffic numbers. Personally, I like that the free option that Google is offering is better than the Facebook option ever was and right now it would be impossible for me to ignore this as a business owner.&nbsp; Oh, and it will get you more organic eyeballs on Google.com than before too. Seems like a no brainer.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/">Social Advertising: Pay for Your Facebook Page? Google Places Moves into Google+</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/social-advertising-pay-for-your-facebook-page-google-places-moves-into-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Makes Big Moves &#8211; Bigger Than You May Realize</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/google-makes-big-moves-bigger-than-you-may-realize/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Glasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Search]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/google-makes-big-moves-bigger-than-you-may-realize/">Google Makes Big Moves &ndash; Bigger Than You May Realize</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>In case you haven’t been paying attention, this week has been a pretty huge week for Google. They have made some big announcements that, I think, will have some pretty big influence on the future of technology. They may not seem like much on the surface or by themselves but when you see them all [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/google-makes-big-moves-bigger-than-you-may-realize/">Google Makes Big Moves &ndash; Bigger Than You May Realize</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/google-makes-big-moves-bigger-than-you-may-realize/">Google Makes Big Moves &ndash; Bigger Than You May Realize</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="How much brighter can Google shine? A LOT" border="0" alt="bright star" align="left" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/5309484825f9_14700/1046179_82678719_thumb.jpg" width="198" height="205">In case you haven’t been paying attention, this week has been a pretty huge week for Google. They have made some big announcements that, I think, will have some pretty big influence on the future of technology. They may not seem like much on the surface or by themselves but when you see them all on the same page together the story takes a different form. Below are some of them and how I think <strong><em>could</em></strong> shake out.    <br clear="all"></p>
<h4><a href="https://thenextweb.com/google/2012/05/21/google-chrome-overtakes-internet-explorer-as-the-webs-most-used-browser/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google Chrome surpasses Internet Explorer as the web’s most popular browser</a></h4>
<p>Less than four years after its introduction, the Chrome browser is now the top choice as it edged out IE to become the “Web’s most used browser”. This is something that no other browser has been able to do –&nbsp; including the sweetheart underdog Firefox. This is particularly interesting since Google introduced the Chrome OS and started shipping <a title="This WILL be commonplace sooner than later - this is inevitable." href="https://www.google.com/chromebook/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Chomebooks</a> that essentially turn hardware into dummy terminals. This means anyone can use any computer that has this OS as if it were their own – seamlessly. Why so interesting? Well, the Chrome browser essentially <strong><em>IS</em></strong> the interface for the Chrome OS. While Chromebooks haven’t caught on in a huge way – yet – it stands to reason that the more comfortable the general populous is with Chrome, the more likely they will make the decision to take the plunge and go to a complete cloud OS.</p>
<h4><a href="https://mashable.com/2012/05/16/google-knowledge-graph/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google rolls out their Knowledge Graph</a></h4>
<p>With the introduction of <a title="In case you are not familiar" href="https://www.phacient.com/google-is-not-evil-how-search-is-changing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">social search</a> a few months back Google has made it’s industry dominating search even better. Now, Google has embraced what they call the Knowledge Graph (as opposed to the somewhat useless Social Graph) that actually connects people to information based on passion, interest, and knowledge instead of us simply “knowing each other online”. Just in case anyone was thinking about taking a shot at the king, Google turns around and innovates innovates innovates. <a title="Perhaps the begining of the end for SEO companies" href="https://www.phacient.com/is-the-seo-business-dying/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Panda</a>, then Social Search, and now Knowledge Graph. This brings Google a little closer to an artificial intelligence-type search. It’s going to be hard for anyone to think about challenging them on the search front from quite some time.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.seobythesea.com/2012/05/more-google-glasses-patents-beyond-the-design/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google awarded 7 new patents for Google Glasses</a></h4>
<p>A new product Google is working on that isn’t really showing up in the mainstream yet but is all the talk amongst us geeks is <a title="Oh, how so many of us have dreamed of something like this." href="https://plus.google.com/browser-not-supported/?ref=/%2BGoogleGlass/posts" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google Glasses</a>. They just were awarded seven more new patents – and only one of them for design. The other six were for what they are calling their “heads up technology’ and how it works. Essentially, this product will be a visor (or something similar) that you can wear over your eyes that will give you almost a sixth sense. It’s commonly referred to as augmented reality.</p>
<p>Imagine walking down the isles of your local grocery store and by simply looking at the products on the shelves you could be alerted to the best product relative to your needs. If you only shop organic, it could tell you if it was really organic or just a packaging trick. If you made your shopping list prior to coming to the store, you could be given an alert when you looked at a product that you needed and which one is the best buy. You could easily be told which direction to walk toward your next meeting in the neighborhood. You could even be sent alerts right across your visor while you are in that meeting with timely information from any source you may choose. The possibilities are endless and what’s so ironic is that the information already exists. Remember, Google is an information company. They are now just building the hardware to serve up that information in an easier, faster way.</p>
<h4>Larry Page <a title="You can watch the whole press conference here" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ic0kc87FdQ&amp;feature=youtu.be" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announces in NYC this week</a> that Google to give office space to Cornell’s new engineering school</h4>
<p>So now Google is getting into bed with Cornell – am amazing resource for smart people. What does Google covet most? Smarts. Yes, this is certainly going to be Google’s farm system. Page actually made mention of Google’s Self-Driving Car and the video they recently made showing how it works. If you haven’t seen it, please watch this below. It may be one of the coolest things you have ever seen that wasn’t Sci-Fi.</p>
<div style="padding-bottom: 20px; margin: 0px auto; padding-left: 0px; width: 448px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 20px" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:e4f31bda-cfcd-4620-a23c-47f90c308e76" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">
<div id="2792ac6a-fd5a-4ebc-b4a3-1344f498ebd0" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;">
<div><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdgQpa1pUUE&amp;hd=1" target="_new" rel="noopener"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/5309484825f9_14700/videod7707de550f2.jpg" style="border-style: none" galleryimg="no" onload="var downlevelDiv = document.getElementById('2792ac6a-fd5a-4ebc-b4a3-1344f498ebd0'); downlevelDiv.innerHTML = &quot;


<div><object width=\&quot;448\&quot; height=\&quot;252\&quot;><param name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/cdgQpa1pUUE?hl=en&amp;hd=1\&quot;><\/param><embed src=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/cdgQpa1pUUE?hl=en&amp;hd=1\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; width=\&quot;448\&quot; height=\&quot;252\&quot;><\/embed><\/object><\/div>&quot;;&#8221; alt=&#8221;&#8221;></a></div>
</div>
<div style="width:448px;clear:both;font-size:.8em">I never get bored of this video. Amazing what this will do for society.</div>
</div>
<p>Even more interesting than Google’s interest in academia and perhaps having an advantage with regard to recruiting directly out of such an institution is that they will realistically have <strong><em>INFLUENCE</em></strong> on academia and will help to shape and form at least the computer science program of this and other schools of this ilk. Who knows, there may even be Google-specific classes offered for students that want to be specifically educated on engineering and computer science ‘the Google way’. This is pretty powerful and a little scary to some, I’m sure. Going back to the example of the Self-Driving Car, imagine instead of Google designing the mechanisms that go into retrofitting existing cars, custom tailoring the engineers they need to build those vehicles that best lend themselves to Google’s needs. It’s a pretty exciting prospect.</p>
<h4><a href="https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/weve-acquired-motorola-mobility.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google acquires Motorola Mobility</a></h4>
<p>In case you are not aware, the most popular mobile operating system in the US (and maybe the world at this point but don’t quote me on that) is the Android OS. There are basically three companies out there that make the best Android phones that everyone seems to gobble up – HTC, Samsung, and Motorola. These three companies are part of the reason that Android has been able to dominate the market in such a short amount of time. Now Google owns one. What does that do to the direction of mobile hardware? Will Google become the sole manufacturer of the Droid? Will HTC and Samsung be left out in the cold? Will Google do something similar to Apple and take back a bit of control of the OS to improve quality, consistency and features? I’ll tell you this, if they purchase a carrier it’s <strong>ON</strong>!</p>
<h4>The Takeaways</h4>
<p>Let’s review: hardware, search, hardware, academia/hardware, mobile hardware. See a trend here? Google is diversifying as they have been for some time but they are being a bit more overt about making inroads into the consumer technology space and not limiting themselves to search and information leveraging. I think it’s a good thing. I recently bought a Samsung Galaxy Nexus directly from Google. It’s perhaps the best phone I have ever held in my hand. I think they have been testing the waters for some time and now they are getting ready to do this on a grand scale. I joke around all the time and say that you can make anything better by “sprinkling a little Google on it.” Seems there’s going to be more and more physical products with that logo on them coming. Do you have any ideas of some of the others?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/google-makes-big-moves-bigger-than-you-may-realize/">Google Makes Big Moves &ndash; Bigger Than You May Realize</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I Need a Facebook Page?</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/do-i-need-a-facebook-page/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/do-i-need-a-facebook-page/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googleplus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/do-i-need-a-facebook-page/">Do I Need a Facebook Page?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>With the recent Facebook IPO and all of the hubbub about the company, I’m sure many small businesses are revisiting the question that they have asked themselves time and time again – ‘Do I need a Facebook page for my business’? I wish there was a better answer but really my best is, “It depends”. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/do-i-need-a-facebook-page/">Do I Need a Facebook Page?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/do-i-need-a-facebook-page/">Do I Need a Facebook Page?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 0px auto 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="If you are going to do it, make sure you are doing it for the right reasons." src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Do-I-Need-a-Facebook-Page_14515/Facebook_Page_thumb.png" alt="Facebook_Page" width="570" height="268" border="0"></p>
<p>With the recent <a title="The stock has not fared as well as many thought it would" href="https://www.google.com/search?q=NASDAQ:FB" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Facebook IPO</a> and all of the hubbub about the company, I’m sure many small businesses are revisiting the question that they have asked themselves time and time again – ‘Do I need a Facebook page for my business’? I wish there was a better answer but really my best is, “It depends”. The good news is that there are a few questions you can ask yourself that can help you make your decision. To be honest, you can probably replace the term “<a title="Our Facebook Page - shameless, I know." href="https://www.facebook.com/phacient" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Facebook</a>” with any social channel such as “Corporate <a title="Again, shameless." href="https://mobile.twitter.com/phacient" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Twitter</a> Account”, “<a title="You get what I'm saying." href="https://plus.google.com/browser-not-supported/?ref=/%2BPhacient/posts" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google+ Page</a>”, “LinkedIn Business Page”, etc. Admittedly, I chose Facebook for the title of this post for SEO value. <img decoding="async" class="wlEmoticon wlEmoticon-smile" style="border-style: none;" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Do-I-Need-a-Facebook-Page_14515/wlEmoticon-smile.png" alt="Smile"></p>
<h4>If your reason for having a Facebook page is any of the following than I would say you <strong><em>SHOULD</em></strong> have a page</h4>
<ul>
<li>Creating a local presence online where you can engage current and prospective customers</li>
<li>Increase a brand awareness</li>
<li>Create a resource to demonstrate a genuine investment in the area your business focuses on or the area where it exists</li>
<li>You plan on constantly maintaining and monitoring the page</li>
<li>A mechanism to drive traffic to a destination you own and control –&nbsp; such as your website</li>
<li>You want to promote your business in a healthy way and not let it take over your personal Facebook timeline</li>
</ul>
<p>These are all good reasons to create a page and I would advise you to do so. Maybe start small and set it up yourself to get things up and running. Invite all of your friends and ask them to spread the word about your business and support you. You will quickly find your voice and then you can determine if you need some third party product or service to get you to <a title="We can help you with that if and when you are ready" href="https://www.phacient.com/our-products/marketing-strategy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the next level</a>. It’s always smart to have a baseline reading though so don’t just jump into something like this. It may create unrealistic expectations if you do so. Plus you will want to understand everything that is out there and that will take time. Patience is key here. This page is not going to save your business or affect your sales over night. It’s Facebook, not magic.</p>
<h4>If your reason for having a Facebook page is any of the following than I would say you <strong><em>SHOULD NOT</em></strong> have a page</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sell stuff on Facebook</li>
<li>My competition has one</li>
<li>You want a turnkey solution that you can set up and walk away</li>
<li>A substitute for your website</li>
<li>Create a second means of spamming your friends and family with promotions and news about your business</li>
</ul>
<p>Although I think Facebook will embrace social commerce more in the coming years if it continues to garner the interest it has over the last 6 years, it’s not there yet. Nobody is going to buy a house, car, or even a handbag off your Facebook page. There are very few pages that have any commerce element to them and those are custom made (to one extent or another) and expensive. There’s a reason for this – people don’t buy things on Facebook. There are far too many Facebook pages out there that are abandoned because people feel that they can just set one up and walk away. if you don’t intend to maintain it, don’t waste your time or the time of your network. It’s also not a website, your website is a website. If you don’t want to kill yourself putting a website up then set one up on <a title="You can be up and running in about 10 minutes" href="https://wordpress.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WordPress</a>. Website first, other things next. If a website is too much for you to handle then you shouldn’t even think about Facebook. If you want a website and all of these things you will want to consider hiring someone to do it for you – but you will still have to put in some time to creating content and maintaining it. There is no ‘set it and forget it’ solution here.</p>
<h4>What does this mean to your business?</h4>
<p>A Facebook page can be a really great tool to have conversations and inform people who care about your business about what you’ve got going on. Restaurants, bars, retail stores, real estate brokerages, accountants, and doctors are all excellent candidates for Facebook <strong><em>if</em></strong> they are prepared to be patient and maintain it. If someone writes on that wall, you <strong>need</strong> to respond. To ignore it will do more harm than not having a page at all.&nbsp; Before you roll your eyes, you as an owner don’t have to do this yourself. You can hire a third party to do this but I wouldn’t recommend that. You are better off using someone within your organization. With a <a title="Click on Training and Education" href="https://www.phacient.com/our-products/management/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">minimal amount of training</a> an admin or other employee can monitor and maintain this and just alert you about important stuff – such as someone trashing you up on Facebook. You can deal with it then. You may have someone on staff that actually <em><strong>wants</strong></em> to do it as well. Pay them a few extra dollars to own that responsibility and you may find that you have tapped into a great new channel to cultivate new customers and retain your current ones.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/do-i-need-a-facebook-page/">Do I Need a Facebook Page?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/do-i-need-a-facebook-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Craigslist Needs to Raise Their Fees &#8211; at Least for Real Estate</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/why-craigslist-needs-to-raise-their-fees-at-least-for-real-estate/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/why-craigslist-needs-to-raise-their-fees-at-least-for-real-estate/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-craigslist-needs-to-raise-their-fees-at-least-for-real-estate/">Why Craigslist Needs to Raise Their Fees &ndash; at Least for Real Estate</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>So I have a lot of friends that are real estate professionals – and by professionals I MEAN professionals. These people pride themselves on their work and reputations which – I have learned – is really all you have in this business.&#160; It really bothers me that, as a whole, real estate people are not [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-craigslist-needs-to-raise-their-fees-at-least-for-real-estate/">Why Craigslist Needs to Raise Their Fees &ndash; at Least for Real Estate</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-craigslist-needs-to-raise-their-fees-at-least-for-real-estate/">Why Craigslist Needs to Raise Their Fees &ndash; at Least for Real Estate</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="As much as I love it, Craigslist is broken for NYC real estate" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/craigslist_broken.png" alt="craigslist_broken" width="165" height="78" align="left" border="0">So I have a lot of friends that are real estate professionals – and by professionals <a title="If you haven't heard of these folks, I don't know where you've been...." href="https://www.luckystrikersnyc.com/members/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">I <em><strong>MEAN </strong></em>professionals</a>. These people pride themselves on their work and reputations which – I have learned – is really all you have in this business.&nbsp; It really bothers me that, as a whole, real estate people are not highly regarded. They are looked at negatively for their lack of knowledge, professionalism, and ethics – and for many, these stereotypes are well-founded. Which is why good real estate professionals <strong><em>really </em></strong>shine.</p>
<p>Having worked with so many over the last six years or so I am confident that I can sniff out good ones vs. bad.&nbsp; So I deal with it. Today I am having a rough day as part of what I have going on is that I am looking for a new apartment in my neighborhood for my growing family. So I do what many do and from time to time I go up to <a title="This is the Craigslist I use. There are many like it but this one is mine..." href="https://newyork.craigslist.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Craiglist</a> and see if I can find that one gem of an apartment we all dream about. We’ve all heard the stories of our friends who found some awesome digs up there. It’s the dream – at least around these parts.</p>
<h4>The Craigslist Challenge</h4>
<p>The problem with Craigslist, in case you don’t already know, is that it’s essentially the wild wild West. It is, for the most part, completely un-moderated. You can flag things for abuse or mis-categorization and they might be taken down but there are no real ramifications since you can always just set up another account if and when they suspend yours. It’s a true buyer beware environment. They have their issues but it works well enough, if you are a smart consumer, to avoid any real backlash and you can get a good bargain a lot of the time. I think, however, it may be time for <a title="He's the guy who founded Craigslist" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Newmark" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mr. Newmark</a> to consider raising his fees – at least for real estate.</p>
<h4>You Can’t Do Whatever You Want</h4>
<p>The problem with using Craigslist for looking for a place to live is that there is a ridiculous amount of noise up there. In a climate where agents and brokers have to <a title="These costs are justified - unless you can do it better yourself." href="https://www.phacient.com/online-advertising-101-real-estate-people-dont-read-this/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pay big premiums</a> for ads on sites like Zillow, Trulia, and Realtor.com, I can see the immense appeal of Craigslist who charges <a title="$10 to post a broker ad for a rental in NYC is NOTHING." href="https://www.craigslist.org/about/help/posting_fees" target="_blank" rel="noopener">minimal fees</a>. There are several products out there that will actually plug into Craigslist and help real estate professionals leverage the platform to get their listings in there for everyone to see. And since the listings automatically expire the system stays pretty clean, right? <strong>No</strong>.</p>
<p>Actually all that does is motivate people who want to game this system to schedule programs like this to auto-repost their listings regardless or their status because the system just does what you tell it to do. What is a bit more frustrating is that users will post different variations of their listings in an effort to come up in other searches done on the site. Now, don’t misunderstand me here, you don’t need one of these systems to do this. In fact, you can just copy and past your ads up here the old fashioned way – it’s just much less efficient. And also, don’t assume that the goal of using Craigslist for real estate is to actually move a piece of property – it’s really used much more, in my opinion, to generate <em>LEADS</em>……that&#8217; ain’t right. I can’t tell you how many times I have called on an apartment that has been listed moments ago to hear, “Yeah, we just rented that – but I have something just like it for 50% more money.” Heartbreaking.</p>
<p>And really, that’s not the spirit of Craigslist. It’s more about consumer empowerment and disintermediation. Consumers are not there at the pleasure of marketers up on this site. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. So when people such as me go up on Craigslist to find something, they expect that the people up there are at least <strong><em>TRYING</em></strong> to do business. Most everything I see up there for real estate is so poorly put together that it’s, quite frankly, offensive to a consumer.</p>
<h4>Look What I Found</h4>
<p>Below are some results from a search that I did for apartments in my area with a condition that I didn’t want to see <strong><em>any</em></strong> results from a broker that charged a fee. Hey, if I am going to find&nbsp; a gem, wouldn’t not paying for it just sweeten the story? What’s supposed to be returned are rentals from owners and owner paid (OP) apartments. A funny thing about Craigslist is that they don’t charge owners to post their apartments in NYC, just brokers. Seemed like a smart idea at the time, right? <strong>Spoiler Alert</strong>: there are very few that I ever see in my result set that are no fee or by an owner. Most of them are by brokers that even say there is a fee – a direct violation of site policies but there are so many that do this it’s impossible to police them all.</p>
<p>Now, while I appreciate the ambition of brokers and, let’s be honest, sometimes you have to bend a few rules to get the job done, if I were going to bend rules I would want to do it in a way that brings <strong><em>more </em></strong>value than the folks I am up against and potentially pissing off. Just like it’s harder to kick an attractive underage woman out of a club, you don’t want to be the guy with the tape on his glasses and pocket protector that showed up with her. You will be hitting the bricks before she does. Take a look at some of these ads and tell me if you think any of these brokers put in the level of effort necessary to market a place to live by today’s standards. I pose the following questions to specific people:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Brokers/Agents:</strong> How would you respond to your sellers/landlords that questioned you about how you are marketing their property after seeing these ads?</li>
<li><strong>Buyer/Rental Agents:</strong> How much of your time would be wasted with useless questions and qualification efforts if you put your ads in like this? How <strong><em>good </em></strong>could your leads be?</li>
<li><strong>Sellers:</strong> Would you pull your listing from an agent or broker that gave you this level of marketing acumen?</li>
<li><strong>Buyers/Renters:</strong> Is this an acceptable level of marketing effort that you have come to expect in today’s competitive real estate landscape? Would you even respond to any of these ads?</li>
</ul>
<h6><em>Click on any of these for a full screen look at the image</em></h6>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h5>The Fancy Lazy Boy<a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail6.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="If you focused as much on getting some good info and pictures in here as you do all the special characters and stat tracker you might actually rent this apartment" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail6_thumb.png" alt="The Fancy Lazy Boy" width="640" height="289" border="0"></a></h5>
<h4></h4>
<h5>The Man of Mystery</h5>
<h4><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail2.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="So what you are saying is that you have an apartment for $1995 somewhere in my neighborhood but you can't tell me where. It will have to just be a surprise. Shoudl I meet you under the bridge in a trench coat?" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail2_thumb.png" alt="The Man of Mystery" width="640" height="326" border="0"></a></h4>
<h4></h4>
<h5>The Elusive Amish</h5>
<h4><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail5_3.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="If you take pictures here, will it steal the soul of this apartment?" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail5_thumb_3.png" alt="The Elusive Amish" width="640" height="292" border="0"></a></h4>
<h4></h4>
<h5>Mr. Me Me Me</h5>
<h4></h4>
<p><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail3.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Let's focus on the apartment instead of making me your lead, shall we?" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail3_thumb.png" alt="Mr. Me Me Me" width="640" height="342" border="0"></a></p>
<h5>The DIY SEO’er/Recycler</h5>
<p><br clear="all"><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail1.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="I get it, you are being thorough to make sure I don't miss out on this great apartment or perhaps you have more than one identical apartment for me...." src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail1_thumb.png" alt="The DIY SEO'er/Recycler" width="640" height="308" border="0"></a></p>
<h4></h4>
<h5>The Diva</h5>
<h4><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail4.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="I feel privileged to have had the opportunity to even view your ad. PLEASE, can I rent from you?  How's TWO months rent sound? I'll pay anything!" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/CraigsListFail4_thumb.png" alt="The Diva" width="640" height="255" border="0"></a>What this means to your business</h4>
<p>To be honest, as long as Craigslist allows this stuff to keep happening, people will trust the platform less and less – and the traffic will reflect that. I’m not suggesting that they become all draconian about who can post and who cannot but perhaps there should be some mechanism in place to make it harder to break those rules and some sort of penalty for doing so. After all, rules without penalty are rules that cannot be enforced. They fall under norms and values and business is not one for considering those things.</p>
<p>What I recommend YOU do is take a look at who is posting things in a space you want to advertise in up on Craigslist and make sure your ads destroy theirs. If you are going to spend any money make sure it’s smart money. Invest in putting in some solid HTML code and host your own pictures. This will let you put them in anywhere you like in the add and do whatever you like with them. Good ads will waste less time, they will get you better leads and give you more credibility in that space. If you can brand your ads so that people know what they are getting within a second of seeing your ad (like maybe with your brand name in the title) then you are winning. They will trust your ads and they may even forward them to their friends to spread your efforts virally. Another nice little benefit is that you won’t end up on posts like this one making fun of anemic efforts in marketing. <img decoding="async" class="wlEmoticon wlEmoticon-smile" style="border-style: none;" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/Why-Craigs-List-Shouldnt-Be-FreeFor-Real_DB49/wlEmoticon-smile.png" alt="Smile"></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/why-craigslist-needs-to-raise-their-fees-at-least-for-real-estate/">Why Craigslist Needs to Raise Their Fees &ndash; at Least for Real Estate</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/why-craigslist-needs-to-raise-their-fees-at-least-for-real-estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Need for Common Definition</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/on-the-need-for-common-definition/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Drasin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/on-the-need-for-common-definition/">On the Need for Common Definition</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>People often argue about if agents are worth what they are paid, who is a good agent, what makes a good agent, and so forth. I’m not (for now) going to dive into any of these questions, but instead step back and try and determine how do we even go about setting up the discussion [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/on-the-need-for-common-definition/">On the Need for Common Definition</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/on-the-need-for-common-definition/">On the Need for Common Definition</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.phacient.com/on-the-need-for-common-definition/" rel="attachment wp-att-1302"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1302" title="Defining what makes a good agent is tough" alt=""></a><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Defining what makes a good agent is tough" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/On-the-need-for-common-definition_12C3/1090780_60617770.jpg" alt="Define_Real_Esate_Quality" width="160" height="161" align="left" border="0">People often argue about if agents are <a title="Do agents make too much money?" href="https://malcolmcarter.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/the-high-road-we-make-too-damn-much-money/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">worth what they are paid</a>, who is a <a title="How to choose a real estate agent is still a mystery" href="https://www.aol.com/real-estate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">good agent</a>, <a title="Can you really determine if an agent is &quot;good&quot;?" href="https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2008/01/18/earning-your-keep/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">what makes a good agent</a>, and so forth. I’m not (for now) going to dive into any of these questions, but instead step back and try and determine how do we even go about setting up the discussion in order to answer those questions? The more I think about it, the more I come to believe that real estate agents represent a very unusual profession that sells a very unusual good which is why it makes comparisons and evaluation so challenging. If we are going to be able to answer any of the above questions, we need to first dive into the question of “what exactly is a real estate agent”.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="&quot;You'll pay whatever we tell you you're gonna pay&quot;" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/On-the-need-for-common-definition_12C3/IMG_2841.jpg" alt="Gas_Prices" width="180" height="208" align="right" border="0">In economics we learn about many types of goods and how, as a society, we should deal with and evaluate them. For instance, inelastic goods (those which demand is independent of prices) are often watched closely for abuse. Why do you think there is so much outrage over rising gas prices? Prices are going up and there is limited ability to reduce demand or substitute in another good. Alternatively we have goods which appear to be natural monopolies (utilities being the most obvious example) which is why in many areas the power and water companies are either heavily regulated or run by state commissions.</p>
<p>So how does real estate fit into any of this? Well, as it turns out, I cannot find a type of good to accurately describe the role of a real estate agent and the subsequent real-estate transaction. Real estate agents act as advisors (though not legally fiduciaries) but do not come to the table with objective knowledge. The closest I could find is something called an experiential good. This is a good where the actual experience of using the good is in itself the value. Think of a visit to the movie theater or going on vacation; you experience the value. However, with an experiential good you can evaluate the value of it as you experience it. You usually leave a movie theater knowing if you got your $12 worth.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="You really have no idea what your home is worth or if you got a good price" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/On-the-need-for-common-definition_12C3/1382168_33682014.jpg" alt="House_Value" width="173" height="159" align="left" border="0">When it comes to a real estate agent, your ability to <a title="Interacting with a real estate agent every seven years makes it hard to gauge if they are any good" href="https://www.aol.com/real-estate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">evaluate their performance</a> is limited. After you sell your house, you never know if you could have gotten another $10,000. Would the home have sold as well if you hadn’t spent $5,000 fixing it up before sale? Unfortunately we have no way to rerun the same home sale 50 times and answer these questions. There are some comparisons that can be made with law, medicine, and business consulting, but in general those industries deal with more common transactions and are heavily licensed, regulated, and monitored (back to the earlier point).</p>
<p>As someone who has been on both sides of the consulting table, I can say that one of the real challenges with such ‘professional’ goods is developing a valid metric of performance. Moreover, many existing metrics are prone to gaming. For instance there is evidence that, after the introduction of success rate reporting, surgeons becoming overly risk-averse in regards to the patience they will work on. Some typical ones used with real estate agents are of very questionable validity. Is time on market really a good measure? Any economist will tell you that a good that sells quickly is selling too cheaply. Research on the time-on-market and sale price of real estate agent’s own homes supports this (they are on the market longer and sell at higher prices). Is the raw number of homes sold a good measure? The number which sell within 3% of posted price? Buying agents getting more than 5% under list price?<br />
I think what is needed is to begin a conversation around how to address this. We are in a situation where information is becoming increasingly available and can be leveraged to consider some complex questions. What evaluation criteria, both objective and subjective, can we use? How can we avoid building statistics that are so easily gamed? This is the perfect time to take a fresh look at an old industry in a very new way.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/on-the-need-for-common-definition/">On the Need for Common Definition</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ugly Side of Facebook Apps</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/">The Ugly Side of Facebook Apps</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>So I’m up on Facebook the other day Have you noticed lately there are things in your Facebook news feed that are labeled “Trending Articles”? They are generally a small group of rolled up story/news links from popular sites like Yahoo or the Washington Post that your friends are “currently reading”. This alludes that they [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/">The Ugly Side of Facebook Apps</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/">The Ugly Side of Facebook Apps</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<h4>So I’m up on Facebook the other day</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 10px 20px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="We don't like Privacy Concerns" border="0" alt="No Privacy on Facebook" align="left" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/facebook-dislike-icon.png" width="98" height="92">Have you noticed lately there are things in your Facebook news feed that are labeled “Trending Articles”? They are generally a small group of rolled up story/news links from popular sites like Yahoo or the Washington Post that your friends are “currently reading”. This alludes that they have shared this article with their Facebook friends online intentionally. I often will click on a link that one of my friends share if it looks interesting. This is how I found this and what inspired this post.</p>
<p>I tend to consume a lot of content through what those I am connected to share. I do this across the board on all my networks. Twitter is by far the most pure with regard to this, and then comes Google+ and LinkedIn and now bringing up the rear is Facebook. The other day, I clicked on an interesting link that looked something like this:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Trending_Articles.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Cool, my friend shared a good article. Let's check this out." border="0" alt="Facebook_Trending_Articles" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Trending_Articles_thumb.png" width="504" height="151"></a></p>
<p>So it shows me that one of my connections has read this article and found it good enough to share it with their social world, right? Not necessarily. When I clicked on the link, I anticipated being taken to the article, maybe via redirect but resulting there nonetheless. This is what I actually got:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Trending_Articles_App.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Wait, what is this? An app to access a link????" border="0" alt="Facebook_Trending_Articles_App" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Trending_Articles_App_thumb.png" width="504" height="230"></a></p>
<p>Now, I know what you are thinking, “What’s this app for?” Well, this <strong><em>could be</em></strong> the result of whomever you think shared an article installing this very app because this happened to them and they just clicked ‘Okay, Read Article’. There are three important things to note here:</p>
<h4>It can access your information</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 10px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Access to things specific to your accout" border="0" alt="Facebook_Trending_Articles_App" align="left" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Trending_Articles_App_thumb_3.png" width="187" height="119">By installing this app, you are essentially giving the creators of this app access to all of your basic info, the about you section, and a list of everything you have ever liked on Facebook. They can do with that what they like. They may use it to post other articles by you (see below), target you for ads, or even spam you via your email account you have listed on Facebook.</p>
<h4>It can post on your behalf</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 10px 10px 20px 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="It can post things to your wall as you - even though it's not you - and you have no idea it's happening" border="0" alt="Facebook_Trending_Articles_App" align="right" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Trending_Articles_App_thumb_4.png" width="361" height="102">Yes, you too can enjoy the benefits of content being posted to your timeline without ever having to log into Facebook. You may have never read that content or even agree that it’s good enough to share but that’s another story. This gives the app the authority to post at will. It’s unlikely that they would do much of that but it’s happening more and more. Whenever you see one of your friends sharing content that you are surprised by, check the source on the bottom of the post. It’s probably an app doing that.</p>
<h4>By default, those posts will be public</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 10px 20px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="All your friends are going to see it" border="0" alt="Facebook_Trending_Articles_App" align="left" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Trending_Articles_App_thumb_5.png" width="302" height="91">You can control who sees this content. I think this is one of the terms and conditions of developing apps on Facebook but it also gives you more incentive to install the app. Maybe you only want your friends and family to see that you are recommending articles from High Times but not any of your coworkers. Yeah, they’ve got you covered. Alternatively there is an option for only you to see what you’ve posted via the app just in case you are the type of person to browse your own timeline. Wow, after reading that last sentence I realize this really makes no sense except that you can keep them from spamming your friends but still mine your information in the background – a clear benefit for you…..</p>
<p>I gotta be honest, this all really turns me off. The reality of the situation is that when I read something online, there are any number of ways to share this directly to any of my many social channels by simply clicking a chicklet or a button and then I have the option of personalizing the share with a serious or snarky comment. <strong>WHY</strong> exactly would I want to give that option up to let an app mechanically share this content? Most people wouldn’t.</p>
<h4>What does this mean to your business?</h4>
<p>The thing is, there is a level of security involved here since you don’t know what that app is going to share. Maybe it’s an article touting one of your competitors. Essentially, this is allowing these “news sources” to serve ads for <strong><em>their</em></strong> content (and potentially something you absolutely don’t want) on <strong><em>your</em></strong> timeline. With those two ideas in place, I have to ask you this: “Would you let anyone (competitor or not) put free ads on your website?” If the answer is yes then please stop reading and copy this image to your computer and post it in the sidebar of your website <strong>IMMEDIATELY</strong>. No time to waste!</p>
<p align="center"><a title="What a great little company!" href="https://www.phacient.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Clearly we are kidding.....unless you are serious. :-)" border="0" alt="Phacient-Joke-Ad" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Phacient-Joke-Ad_thumb.png" width="383" height="197"></a></p>
<p>If your answer was no then we are in agreement. This is a bad idea. Here’s what you can do to stop this from happening to you:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Don’t install these apps</strong>. No matter how awesome the headline looks, you know what their game is so don’t fall for it. Seriously, I know&nbsp; you want to read that Justin Bieber article right now but you must resist. Do yourself a favor, go directly to the news source and simply look on the home page. Odds are you won’t have to search the site. It will be right there in your face.</li>
<li>Go to Facebook.com and <strong>access your privacy settings</strong>:<br />
<a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy1.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Access your Facebook Privacy Settings" border="0" alt="Access Facebook Privacy Settings" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy1_thumb.png" width="551" height="389"></a></li>
<li>Then scroll down to ‘Ads, Apps and Websites’. How apropos that they lumped these together since these particular apps focus on all three of these. <strong>Click ‘Edit Settings’</strong><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy2.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><br />
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="At least they are honest about what these things do" border="0" alt="Ads, Apps and Websites" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy2_thumb.png" width="520" height="275"></a></li>
<li>Then you will see a section called ‘Apps you use’. In reality these apps are using you but I digress. <strong>Click ‘Edit Settings’</strong><br />
<a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy3.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Access the Apps you have installed" border="0" alt="Access the Apps you have installed" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy3_thumb.png" width="520" height="311"></a></li>
<li>
<div align="left">You’ll see all of the apps you have installed on your Facebook account. <strong>WARNING</strong>: You may have<strong><em> A LOT</em></strong> of them if this is your first time on this screen. Chances are you have installed an app or two to sign in or access certain places on the web and you didn’t even consider that these apps now had the keys to the house, if you will. If you recently were concerned about an app maybe having been installed, you will see that at the top of the list so <strong>editing/deleting</strong> it will be very easy. I’d also recommend you scrolling through the whole list and deleting apps you haven’t used in more than six months – especially if you’ve maybe stopped using the sites/services associated with those apps. This is pretty common and there is no reason to give those apps access to your activities now. Maybe you were a big Farmville player last year and quit cold turkey? Well delete that app – or Zynga will be mining your info.<br />
<a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy4.png" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px auto; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Edit or delete apps that don't need to be all up in your business" border="0" alt="List of Apps you have installed" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/a254e973415c_9DB4/Facebook_Privacy4_thumb.png" width="520" height="347"></a></div>
</li>
</ol>
<p align="left">After it’s all said and done, you have to keep your eyes on this stuff. Remember, these platforms are free so they are going to look for every way possible to monetize the only thing that you are giving them – your data. If you know of any apps that are particularly sneaky or maybe some things that apps are capable of that I haven’t listed, by all means mention them below.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/">The Ugly Side of Facebook Apps</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/the-ugly-side-of-facebook-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Am I Obsessed? A Fan? Or Just Right From The Beginning?</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/am-i-obsessed-a-fan-or-just-right-from-the-beginning/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/am-i-obsessed-a-fan-or-just-right-from-the-beginning/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 11:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/am-i-obsessed-a-fan-or-just-right-from-the-beginning/">Am I Obsessed? A Fan? Or Just Right From The Beginning?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>The New Phone is Here! The New Phone is Here! I know, it sounds like a scene starring Navin R. Johnson but I just can’t help it. I got a new phone –finally. I’ve been tormented by a jail broken iPhone 3GS for longer than I care to admit to. In Apple’s defense, they don’t [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/am-i-obsessed-a-fan-or-just-right-from-the-beginning/">Am I Obsessed? A Fan? Or Just Right From The Beginning?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/am-i-obsessed-a-fan-or-just-right-from-the-beginning/">Am I Obsessed? A Fan? Or Just Right From The Beginning?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<h4>The New Phone is Here! The New Phone is Here!</h4>
<p>I know, it sounds like a scene starring <a title="In case you didn't get the reference" href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079367/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Navin R. Johnson</a> but I just can’t help it. I got a new phone –finally. I’ve been tormented by a jail broken iPhone 3GS for longer than I care to admit to. In Apple’s defense, they don’t make their phones to be jail broken but in mine I don’t like the way they make everything so proprietary or harvest <a title="I have never made any bones about how I feel about Apple" href="https://www.phacient.com/dont-believe-the-hype/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">every penny</a> they can out of their loyal customers.&nbsp; No concessions, no extras, nuthin’. So when Google announced that they were finally releasing the <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Galaxy Prime</span> Galaxy Nexus in the US, I was thrilled. It’s no secret that I am a huge fan of Google. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 0px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border-image: initial; border-width: 0px;" title="I'm as giddy as a schoolgirl" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/9917a27ab15a_1430D/thenewphonebook.jpg" alt="thenewphonebook" width="175" height="175" align="left" border="0">What I thought I was excited about was an unlocked phone, not being tethered to any carrier and working on any GSM system in the world – and I still am. I thought that having a pure version of Android and running the latest version of the OS (<a title="To give you an idea of why this is so significant" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Cream_Sandwich_(operating_system)#v4.x_Ice_Cream_Sandwich" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ice Cream Sandwich</a>) while getting updates directly from Google was what would really make me happy – and it still does. But what I think it really comes down to is that if you want me to adopt something all you have to do is sprinkle a little Google on it – and it’s true. I am a fan of Google.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Photo Credit: </span><a href="https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/gcuomo/entry/the_new_phone_book_is?lang=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">IBM</span></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h4>Am I as bad as the Apple fanboys I make fun of?</h4>
<p>Kind of but not really. I don’t buy into everything that Google does blindly and so impassioned. Seriously, people who are Apple fans will buy anything that even <strong><em><a title="I know Apple didn't put this out but you get the idea." href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/17/stink-different-apple-macbook-perfume_n_1431445.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">smells like Apple</a></em></strong>. There are things Google has done that have <a title="Apture was awesome. I'm still not over this." href="http://www.apture.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">upset me</a> and that I <a title="I REALLY think this was a bad move - at the very least premature." href="https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2011/11/google-shuts-down-clean-energy-program.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">didn’t agree</a> with.&nbsp;&nbsp; I do however approach my love of Google with great fervor and for good reason. They are amazingly successful and can almost be considered the Anti-Apple. Apple charges you as much as possible for products and services that they maintain control over while Google <a title="There's no such thing as free. Get over it." href="https://www.phacient.com/reevaluating-free-you-get-what-you-pay-for/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">appears</a> to give it all away for free and is open-source about things like Android. But hey, I do love Google. And what’s not to love? I’ve noticed my computing and mobile life just get better and better the more I’ve injected them with Vitamin G.</p>
<h4>It just works</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Just about everything Google does just meshes together correctly" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/9917a27ab15a_1430D/Operations_thumb.png" alt="gears mesh" width="147" height="125" align="left" border="0">Remember when you used to have different programs to manage your calendar, email, contacts, mapping, and documents (word processing, spreadsheets, presentations)? Remember all of the conflicts with format and software you had to deal with? You may still use separate programs today but if you do your life is harder. Much of the reason why life is better with Google is that it just works. Some of this is because they just make things simple. Another reason is that much of it is up in the cloud and syncs to your local devices. In any case, <strong><em>IT JUST WORKS</em></strong>. It may not always have all the features you are use to but you can access it from <strong><em>ANYWHERE</em></strong> and it works the same from <strong><em>any </em></strong>computer. Google is essentially making hardware easier to use and agnostic. My love affair with Google can probably be best summed up by this video by Lamarr Wilson:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center"><iframe src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/m6ghRTMBgak?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p>
<h4>So back to my phone</h4>
<p>So yeah, the whole reason I wrote this post. I picked up the new Samsun Galaxy Nexus that has just been released in the US. I have to say, it’s fast, sexy and, yes, <strong><em>It just works</em></strong>. I’ve never handled any phone ever that can compare to it – not even an iPhone. The functionality is great but also practical. There is very little fluff on this device and has most of the great Google-isms that we have all come to know and love integrated into the OS. The only issue I have had is that my carrier isn’t quite ready for this phone and is having trouble with their systems fully recognizing the hardware but that will be sorted out in a week or so. But the big reason all of this great stuff is possible and I am in love with it is that it’s a Google product. No contract, no carrier handcuffing, nothing. I bought the phone and I can do with it what I wish. In a word, <strong>FREEDOM</strong>. So my obsession is well founded, in my opinion. This device gives me everything I could want – and then some. I’d recommend it for anyone – especially with a price tag of $399. I was happy to spend the money – and I don’t say that a lot.</p>
<h4>What does this mean to your business?</h4>
<p>Well, there’s two takeaways you should glean from this love fest. First, Google can probably make your business operate more efficiently and at a lower cost so you should either research them yourself or talk to someone that knows plenty about them to figure out what fits and how to implement it. <a title="Yeah, that's shameless self-promotion at it's finest." href="https://www.phacient.com/try-us-out/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">I know a guy</a> if you need one. <img decoding="async" class="wlEmoticon wlEmoticon-smile" style="border-style: none;" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/9917a27ab15a_1430D/wlEmoticon-smile.png" alt="Smile"> The second thing to take away from all of this is that you should listen harder to what the consumer wants. They are the tides while you are simply the port. All the great marketing in the world can’t help you if you are not delivering what your customers want and your competition is. At the end of the day, they have the money that you want so you have to make them happy to part with it. And the beauty is, what they want is subjective. You just have to figure out what the largest segment is that you can provide satisfaction to and you win.</p>
<p>What are you doing to listen to your customers/partners? What could your vendors and competitors do better?&nbsp; These things should keep you up at night. Yes, they are <strong><em>that</em></strong> important.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/am-i-obsessed-a-fan-or-just-right-from-the-beginning/">Am I Obsessed? A Fan? Or Just Right From The Beginning?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/am-i-obsessed-a-fan-or-just-right-from-the-beginning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Get More Out of Google+ Status Updates and Posts</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googleplus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/">How Get More Out of Google+ Status Updates and Posts</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>Even though Google+ is in its infancy, they had the insight to build in a few Easter eggs for us true nerds to figure out and play with. Many of us have been observing that one of the nice things about the platform is that is actually has the ability to be used for blogging. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/">How Get More Out of Google+ Status Updates and Posts</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/">How Get More Out of Google+ Status Updates and Posts</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Maybe no sexy but better than nothing...." src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/How-to-Formal-Your-Google-Status-Updates_1C94/MakeItSexy_thumb.png" alt="MakeItSexy" width="218" height="150" align="left" border="0">Even though Google+ is in its infancy, they had the insight to build in a few Easter eggs for us true nerds to figure out and play with. Many of us have been observing that one of the nice things about the platform is that is actually has the ability to be used for blogging. While Facebook sort of tried this with Notes, it never really took off. One of the reasons for that, in my opinion, is because it was only capable of plain text. While Google+ isn’t quite ready for full on HTML 5, they have given us a few formatting tricks that we can use to dress up our text.</p>
<h4><span style="font-weight: bold;">Bold</span></h4>
<p>Bold your text by doing the following:</p>
<p>Placing an asterisk on either side of your text like this: *this text will be bold* and it will look like this: <strong>this text will be bold</strong></p>
<h4></h4>
<h4><em>Italics</em></h4>
<p>Italicize your text by doing this:</p>
<p>Place an underscore on either side of your text like this: _this text will be italicized_ and it will look like this: <em>this text will be italicized</em></p>
<h4></h4>
<h4><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Strikethrough</span></h4>
<p>You can throw a strikethrough on your text by doing the following:</p>
<p>Place a simple dash on either side of your text like this: –this text will be struck- and it will look like this: <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">this text will be struck</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<h3>Getting Fancy</h3>
<p>You can combine some or all of these formatting &nbsp;tactics to get more out of them. A cool observation I had is that you don’t even have to keep the modifiers in order. You can put them in any order.&nbsp; Here’s a pretty extreme example:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">This update will look *a lot* more clever tomorrow morning. I am curious to see if anyone will come back to it and _POSSIBLY_ comment on it. I am pretty certain that Google will roll out some enhanced features to enable Google+ to become _*an actual blogging platform*_ but first they will have to give users a way to -actually- _*EASILY*_ format their text and lay it out in an -_intuitive-_ *-logical*- quick way to make sure it looks good. There, I -_*DECLARED*_- said it.</p>
<p>and it shows up like this</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">This update will look <strong>a lot</strong> more clever tomorrow morning. I am curious to see if anyone will come back to it and <em>POSSIBLY</em> comment on it. I am pretty certain that Google will roll out some enhanced features to enable Google+ to become <strong><em>an actual blogging platform</em></strong> but first they will have to give users a way to <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">actually</span> <strong><em>EASILY</em></strong> format their text and lay it out in an <span style="text-decoration: line-through;"><em>intuitive</em></span>&nbsp; <strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">logical</span></strong> quick way to make sure it looks good. There, I <strong><em><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">DECLARED</span></em></strong> said it.</p>
<h3>What this means to your business</h3>
<p>If you are a community manager or just the person that updates your Google+ business page from time to time, you will be able to use this trick to put lead and section titles on your posts and make them look a bit more like something your viewers will find on your blog. There are relatively few people that use these tactics so you will stand out almost immediately. It will build consistency in your content and you will be in great shape when Google finally rolls out a formatting bar like you have in your Gmail account.&nbsp; Have you come across any other tricks or workarounds for formatting your posts? Share them below so everyone can take advantage of them and you will look like a rock star.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/">How Get More Out of Google+ Status Updates and Posts</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/how-get-more-out-of-google-status-updates-and-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Answer to Pinterest?</title>
		<link>https://www.phacient.com/will-google-crush-pinterest/</link>
					<comments>https://www.phacient.com/will-google-crush-pinterest/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Healy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Search]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.phacient.com/?p=1192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/will-google-crush-pinterest/">Google&#8217;s Answer to Pinterest?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<p>It’s me talking about Google again I know I sound like a one trick pony when I write anything containing the name Google, but in my defense, they are a pretty amazing company. They are spread across so many things that it’s hard not to come into contact with them – constantly. So, to keep [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/will-google-crush-pinterest/">Google&#8217;s Answer to Pinterest?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/will-google-crush-pinterest/">Google&#8217;s Answer to Pinterest?</a> is being shared with you via RSS. It originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
<h4>It’s me talking about Google again</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Will &quot;What Do You Love&quot; crush Pinterest? We'll soon find out." src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/c944be227b8f_14F14/google_pinterest.png" alt="google_pinterest" width="166" height="166" align="left" border="0">I know I sound like a one trick pony when I write anything containing the name Google, but in my defense, they are a pretty amazing company. They are spread across so many things that it’s hard not to come into contact with them – constantly. So, to keep all of those that love to ‘chase the new’ happy, this post will touch on another service that is all the rage – <a title="Right now, Pinterest is al the rage" href="https://www.pinterest.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Pinterest</a>. Anyone that knows me knows I am not a fan of Pinterest due to the <a title="If not done right, Pinterest can be just straight up stealing" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20120329192550/http://www.legalblogger.com:80/pinterest-and-copyright-violations/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">potential intellectual property issues</a> that come with it. What do you expect? If you build a pin board and snip a piece of this article out and put it in there without properly attributing me, you have effectively done nothing less than stolen from me. If my words were an MP3 or a photograph it would be more obvious.</p>
<p>When you think about it though, what’s the biggest benefit of Pinterest? Isn’t it a place where you can go and see a nice visual display of useful information? I think so.&nbsp; People have been caught up in the beauty of it all but I think the real usefulness is the utility. Something that seems great for all of your best chicken recipes can also be a great place to find all of my picks for your best mobile phones.&nbsp; So I will concede that there is a utility to Pinterest along with some serious SEO value – if their systems can <a title="There are issues with links being broken" href="https://theamericangenius.com/social-media/30-improvements-pinterest-should-make-in-2012/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">keep the links straight</a> AND they can keep domains from <a title="Some sites have opted to block Pintrest servers" href="http://www.blogworld.com/2012/02/21/should-you-block-pinterest-on-your-blog/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">blocking them</a>. Yeah, that’s a problem.</p>
<h4>What do you love?</h4>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 20px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Seem familiar? Yeah, just like Google search" src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/c944be227b8f_14F14/WDYL.png" alt="What Do You Love" width="218" height="143" align="left" border="0">So in the interest of clean easy utility, let’s take a look at Google’s version, ‘What do you love?’ It’s a simple question. Coincidently enough, the home page looks <strong>A LOT</strong> like Google.com. It’s amazingly clean and simple. There are <em><strong>NO</strong></em> intellectual property liabilities here since everything that’s served up are <a title="Google is pretty good about covering off on IP, copyright, and privacy issues" href="http://www.google.com/policies/privacy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google services</a> that have simply been populated with your interest and returned results based on that. Now, the downside to this is clearly that it’s AGATH (All Google All The Time) but consider this. How would you normally find something? You’d GOOGLE it!</p>
<h4>Google is not a person</h4>
<p>Yeah, yeah, I know. You can’t replace human beings for finding cool and useful things. Google is just an algorithm that returns results based on what you ask it. NO! <a title="Your friends are now finding things for you" href="https://www.phacient.com/google-is-not-evil-how-search-is-changing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Search is changing</a> and that stupid algorithm (at least in it’s current state) is going to be less important very soon. As people +1 things, they will get more weight based on what <strong>YOUR</strong> friends think is cool and useful. Social search will change the way we find things and consume content.&nbsp; And I’m sure WDYL will be making use of that; they’d be crazy not to.</p>
<p>And as for humans finding things and populating them in Pinterest; there’s a flaw with that as well – how do they know what you like? One man’s treasure is another man’s trash. I rarely agree with the masses and I think on any given subject most anyone can. If my friends were exclusively pinning things for my consumption then that would be better but that will limit my world. With social search, all that opens up and you can have two and three degrees of separation with their respective weights.</p>
<h4>What does this mean to your business?</h4>
<p><a href="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/c944be227b8f_14F14/WDYL_images.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 10px 20px 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="There I am - right below that pesky Patrick Healy from the NY Times. Grrrrr " src="https://www.phacient.com/images/blog/livewriter/c944be227b8f_14F14/WDYL_images_thumb.png" alt="WDYL images" width="146" height="196" align="right" border="0"></a>This is all in its infancy so there is never going to be a better time to do this than now – before everyone else gets in on it. For what it’s worth, I did a search on my name today on both services and didn’t get <strong>any</strong> results on <a title="See for yourself" href="https://www.pinterest.com/search/?q=Patrick+Healy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Pinterest</a> but did get plenty on WDYL. Given, much of it wasn’t me for <a title="Don't get me started" href="https://www.phacient.com/reputation-management-why-its-sometimes-hard-to-be-you/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">whatever reason</a> but at least I got <em>something </em>I could use and refine from there. WDYL will get better and better. My prediction is that some will use it instead of Google.com. How can you take advantage of this? Well, for starters you can +1 every page on the web involving positive content about your business and yourself. Mentioned in the local paper? +1 it. Did an interview for another blog and the video is on YouTube? +1 it.&nbsp; And don’t stop there. Encourage your customers and clients to +1 your website and anything they find about you. Maybe offer some sort of incentive if they +1 it and tag you in the comment when they do. When they do this, they are giving you access to their sphere of influence. They are also going to help to populate that search for your business up on WDYL.&nbsp; Pretty powerful stuff.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>-PH</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.phacient.com/will-google-crush-pinterest/">Google&#8217;s Answer to Pinterest?</a> originally appeared on <a href="https://www.phacient.com">Phacient</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.phacient.com/will-google-crush-pinterest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
