<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly from Elsevier Business Intelligence</title><link>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly</link><description>Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly from Elsevier Business Intelligence</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Elsevier Business Intelligence, www.ElsevierBI.com.</copyright><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly" /><feedburner:info uri="pharmaceuticalapprovalsmonthly" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{2993CD68-CB25-4D9B-A538-DC5C2F9F43ED}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/xhx3VEvaPow/is-the-time-finally-right-for-bispecific-antibodies</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Platform Technologies</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Subjects">Preclinical Through Proof-Of-Concept</category><category domain="Subjects">Discovery</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Cancer</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Blood Cancer</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Leukemia</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Hodgkin's Disease</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Tumors, Solid</category><title>Is The Time Finally Right For Bispecific Antibodies?</title><description>Merck, Lilly, Gilead and Celgene are among the companies striking deals that involve bispecific antibodies. The novel dual-acting drugs have been in development since the 1980s with little success, yet big pharma believes they may finally be coming of age.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/xhx3VEvaPow" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:55:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/is-the-time-finally-right-for-bispecific-antibodies?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0447F6CE-B97F-4D18-8A05-7526D3C566A3}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ELig4E9J75M/surveying-the-landscape-of-bispecific-antibodies-in-clinical-development</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Platform Technologies</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Subjects">Preclinical Through Proof-Of-Concept</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Cancer</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Blood Cancer</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Lymphoma</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Ovarian Cancer</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Tumors, Liquid</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Tumors, Solid</category><title>Surveying The Landscape Of Bispecific Antibodies In Clinical Development</title><description>Bispecific antibodies that can target two different disease antigens with one molecule come in many different formats and could be applied to a range of therapeutic areas. Oncology and inflammatory disease are at the forefront of clinical development (see related story, "Is The Time Finally Right For Bispecific Antibodies?" — Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly, April 2013).&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ELig4E9J75M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:30:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/surveying-the-landscape-of-bispecific-antibodies-in-clinical-development?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{D1D03CF5-2E05-4457-AE0B-EDD8583E6B02}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/NT5BEaqqMDE/deal-activity-highlights-interest-in-bispecific-antibodies</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Subjects">Preclinical Through Proof-Of-Concept</category><category domain="Subjects">Discovery</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Cancer</category><title>Deal Activity Highlights Interest In Bispecific Antibodies</title><description>Bispecific antibodies can be developed using many different formats for multiple therapeutic areas (see related story, "Is The Time Finally Right For Bispecific Antibodies?" — Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly, April 2013). Big pharmas have inked deals with modest upfront payments to explore the use of a variety of technology applications.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/NT5BEaqqMDE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:28:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/deal-activity-highlights-interest-in-bispecific-antibodies?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{9F6AED42-9BDA-436E-9598-29F81F70E5E7}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/FP0d3pGFFdc/cyclacel-reports-on-sapacitabine-program-a-fly-in-the-ointment</link><author>m.goodman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Leukemia</category><title>Cyclacel Reports On Sapacitabine Program: A Fly In The Ointment?</title><description>Cyclacel has made progress on its pivotal trial of lead candidate sapacitabine in AML. But there are questions about its potency as a monotherapy based on an under-reported European trial in which the sapacitabine arm was stopped for futility.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/FP0d3pGFFdc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/cyclacel-reports-on-sapacitabine-program-a-fly-in-the-ointment?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{55664D92-B08B-46E8-AAD4-EF213AA73F47}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/XlG1RA7mlmU/making-a-market-in-womens-health-endometriosis-fibroids-emerge-as-rx-targets</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Endometriosis</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Fibroids</category><title>Making A Market In Women’s Health: Endometriosis, Fibroids Emerge As Rx Targets</title><description>Candidates like AbbVie’s elagolix and Actavis’ Esmya promise oral therapy without the drawbacks of the artificial menopause induced by available hormone suppression therapy – and may pave the way for newer approaches while expanding the market.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/XlG1RA7mlmU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/making-a-market-in-womens-health-endometriosis-fibroids-emerge-as-rx-targets?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3C986BBB-7677-41F6-B11B-BFBDC1055C6B}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/hMjWjG_-eyA/randomization-required-liver-signal-necessitated-emkadcylaem-trial-with-control-arm</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Breast Cancer</category><title>Randomization Required: Liver Signal Necessitated Kadcyla Trial With Control Arm</title><description>A pivotal trial with a control arm was necessary to evaluate a hepatotoxicity signal with Genentech’s Kadcyla, helping to derail a bid for accelerated approval based on a single-arm Phase II trial. Genentech’s strategy of running trials in different lines of treatment concurrently enabled a quick strategy shift as an ongoing controlled Phase III trial in another line was amended to meet FDA’s regulatory requests.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/hMjWjG_-eyA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/randomization-required-liver-signal-necessitated-emkadcylaem-trial-with-control-arm?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{90894D44-4CFE-4DC4-ACDB-92A12770C3A9}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/llYn_tv1zxE/acadias-persistence-with-pimavanserin-in-parkinsons-psychosis-pays-off</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Parkinson's Disease</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Psychosis</category><title>Acadia’s Persistence With Pimavanserin In Parkinson’s Psychosis Pays Off</title><description>After meeting with FDA, Acadia announces it needs only one pivotal study for pimavanserin. The company has canceled a second study and expects to file at the end of 2014.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/llYn_tv1zxE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/acadias-persistence-with-pimavanserin-in-parkinsons-psychosis-pays-off?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0E4225A8-0903-4005-9E82-1709198C4515}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/q2Qalv28IyQ/amgens-melanoma-vaccine-shows-durable-response-survival-still-a-hurdle</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Melanoma</category><title>Amgen’s Melanoma Vaccine Shows Durable Response; Survival Still A Hurdle</title><description>The vaccine acquired from BioVex at high cost still needs to demonstrate overall survival in Phase III and prove value in an increasingly competitive market for melanoma treatments.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/q2Qalv28IyQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/amgens-melanoma-vaccine-shows-durable-response-survival-still-a-hurdle?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{CD3FBA49-DD05-406C-98AC-1D880D0166B5}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ckpOhPPR2xw/ap-pharma-puts-off-apf530-launch-to-2014-after-another-fda-rejection</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Cancer</category><category domain="Tags">"complete response" letter</category><title>A.P. Pharma Puts Off APF530 Launch To 2014 After Another FDA Rejection</title><description>A.P. Pharma faces a second commercial setback as FDA issues another “complete response” letter for its long-acting granisetron in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ckpOhPPR2xw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/ap-pharma-puts-off-apf530-launch-to-2014-after-another-fda-rejection?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{AE130E0E-1BCB-4D29-A76F-C96777DA5781}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/PkBW5WoMLbg/bayer-finds-us-not-a-fertile-market-for-premenopausal-womens-health</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Business Strategies</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Endometriosis</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Fibroids</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Contraceptive</category><title>Bayer Finds U.S. Not A Fertile Market For Pre-Menopausal Women’s Health</title><description>Bayer, one of the world’s largest women’s health firms, is looking East and South for growth in its women’s health franchise, shifting its attention away from mature markets in the U.S. and Europe.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/PkBW5WoMLbg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/bayer-finds-us-not-a-fertile-market-for-premenopausal-womens-health?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{4C72E6EC-CC0B-4632-97D0-0D465F78EF2A}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ywv4ibDSnYo/cyclacel-novelnovel-sequence-promising-in-tough-cancers</link><author>s.haley@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Leukemia</category><title>Cyclacel Novel/Novel Sequence Promising In Tough Cancers</title><description>The combination of two novel drugs from Cyclacel inflicts a form of synthetic lethality in which sapacitabine causes DNA defects, rendering tumor cells vulnerable to seliciclib, which thwarts the repair process and is lethal in its own right, the lead investigator reported April 7 at the American Association for Cancer Research meeting in Washington, D.C.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ywv4ibDSnYo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/cyclacel-novelnovel-sequence-promising-in-tough-cancers?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{880519B0-B695-4593-AC04-7DD44DBE85E9}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/M8LAXwdCBzI/emkadcylaem-manufacturing-review-was-a-production-in-itself</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Manufacturing</category><category domain="Subjects">Product Approvals</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Breast Cancer</category><title>Kadcyla Manufacturing Review Was A Production In Itself</title><description>The complex manufacturing required by Genentech’s antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine pushed FDA’s review two months past the agency’s internal action timetable, required four review teams from three CDER offices and produced a veritable blizzard of information requests. But is that level of intensity sustainable as the expanding ADC pipeline matures?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/M8LAXwdCBzI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/emkadcylaem-manufacturing-review-was-a-production-in-itself?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{E8997A91-1F9A-4FAA-BBCD-DB5F193A31E8}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/scMv-7UYoLU/emyervoyememzelborafem-combo-trial-fails-but-sequential-study-continues</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Cancer</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Melanoma</category><title>Yervoy/Zelboraf Combo Trial Fails, But Sequential Study Continues</title><description>Small Phase I melanoma study testing a combination of Zelboraf and Yervoy was closed early due to an unexpectedly high rate of liver toxicity, investigators report in letter to the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. A sequential study of Yervoy and Zelboraf and other combination studies proceed as planned.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/scMv-7UYoLU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/emyervoyememzelborafem-combo-trial-fails-but-sequential-study-continues?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{DC864A64-AC12-4D6E-8AC7-5F62B4451AEF}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/phSzl92tXRQ/fostamatinib-skates-through-oskira1-with-mixed-results</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Rheumatoid Arthritis</category><title>Fostamatinib Skates Through OSKIRA-1 With Mixed Results</title><description>AstraZeneca/Rigel’s oral SYK inhibitor fostamatinib met a key primary endpoint in the first of three rheumatoid arthritis Phase III studies, but missed another. Investors and analysts are underwhelmed with the efficacy results, although President and COO Raul Rodriguez advises holding on for the other Phase III trials before passing judgment.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/phSzl92tXRQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/fostamatinib-skates-through-oskira1-with-mixed-results?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0118F6C3-F6AC-4FA6-B993-3ACC43FEE402}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/a-QexIZjPvs/ironing-out-the-fine-points-of-endometriosis-trial-design</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Endometriosis</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Fibroids</category><title>Ironing Out the Fine Points Of Endometriosis Trial Design</title><description>Given the paucity of drugs to treat endometriosis and uterine fibroids, it is not surprising that FDA is still feeling out the regulatory standards. Neurocrine and Abbott are testing endpoints along the way.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/a-QexIZjPvs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/ironing-out-the-fine-points-of-endometriosis-trial-design?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{6C85FD52-B0BC-4605-9191-65AD16F5C39F}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/PPf8wENeOKo/march-anda-approvals</link><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Tags">ANDAs</category><title>March ANDA Approvals</title><description>Full and tentative approvals of generic drugs.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/PPf8wENeOKo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/march-anda-approvals?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{5E18F44C-A89E-4E38-9396-0EFE4184F8D5}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/6X00HcnO998/pharmaxis-faces-new-study-requirement-for-cf-drug-embronchitolem</link><author>s.sutter@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Drug Approval Standards</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Tags">"complete response" letter</category><title>Pharmaxis Faces New Study Requirement For CF Drug Bronchitol</title><description>In a “complete response” letter, FDA says efficacy has not been adequately demonstrated for use of dry powder mannitol in cystic fibrosis patients ages six years and older.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/6X00HcnO998" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/pharmaxis-faces-new-study-requirement-for-cf-drug-embronchitolem?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{54AEAA6B-378E-4A85-BAAB-5353DA48D0E3}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/W5rs93hf7LA/repros-emproellexem-is-poised-to-enter-phase-iii--again</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Endometriosis</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Fibroids</category><title>Repros’ Proellex Is Poised To Enter Phase III – Again</title><description>Telapristone was put on clinical hold due to liver toxicity, but the company’s pursuit of vaginal formulation and re-analysis of the initial oral studies allowed the oral program to resume.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/W5rs93hf7LA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/repros-emproellexem-is-poised-to-enter-phase-iii--again?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{666B5AD6-6ECE-4FDA-9070-D9CF3755C00B}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/zXQmQ1zjKTA/ribavirin-sponsors-fend-off-fdaaa-safety-labeling-changes-for-now</link><author>s.sutter@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Product Safety</category><category domain="Subjects">Risk Management</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Hepatitis C</category><title>Ribavirin Sponsors Fend Off FDAAA Safety Labeling Changes, For Now</title><description>FDA said information about ribavirin-related drug resistance may have an impact on a class of investigational hepatitis C compounds in development but agreed with Merck and Genentech that labeling changes were not warranted “at this time.”&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/zXQmQ1zjKTA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/ribavirin-sponsors-fend-off-fdaaa-safety-labeling-changes-for-now?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{6C45E2BC-79C1-4295-A879-CAC2792A426B}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/_TfI53hieIg/ziopharms-future-uncertain-after-poor-picasso-results</link><author>l.lamotta@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Bone Cancer</category><title>Ziopharm’s Future Uncertain After Poor PICASSO Results</title><description>The oncology company ends development of its Phase III candidate in soft tissue sarcoma after progression-free survival data fail to live up to earlier expectations. The company will now refocus on its mid-stage pipeline.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/_TfI53hieIg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/ziopharms-future-uncertain-after-poor-picasso-results?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{62E2BCDC-9FBE-45AA-947F-0E34B5142239}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ZCNb3duB9l8/adoover-fda-uses-prefix-to-get-ahead-of-pulldown-menu-problem</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Breast Cancer</category><title>Ado-Over: FDA Uses Prefix To Get Ahead Of Pull-Down Menu Problem</title><description>The use of computer drop-down menus organized by generic name was identified as a source of medication errors in the clinical program, mixing up Kadcyla with unconjugated trastuzumab. The solution of adding a three-letter prefix to Kadcyla’s nonproprietary name also seems to be the fix for biosimilars.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ZCNb3duB9l8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/adoover-fda-uses-prefix-to-get-ahead-of-pulldown-menu-problem?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{54FA420D-CE36-45D8-8696-7C7E18A27339}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/M2OPQ-fpHOg/march-full-approvals</link><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>March Full Approvals</title><description>Full approvals of NDAs and BLAs.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/M2OPQ-fpHOg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/march-full-approvals?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{1FE3D2BA-668F-4F06-BCC5-73B2178E88EA}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/tlLYNizphas/march-supplemental-approvals</link><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Tags">sNDAs</category><title>March Supplemental Approvals</title><description>Chart lists efficacy supplements and labeling supplements selected by the editors of Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly. This is not a comprehensive list of all supplemental approvals.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/tlLYNizphas" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/march-supplemental-approvals?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{4B7E3ABA-89DC-44AB-A39C-DB0480EB0D6C}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/9HnTR7tPEMQ/estimated-fda-user-fee-review-goals-for-pending-ndasblas</link><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>Estimated FDA User Fee Review Goals For Pending NDAs/BLAs</title><description>User fee goals are calculated based on the date of receipt. For applications submitted Oct. 1, 2012 and later, the timeframes are extended two months, to 12 months for standard review new molecular entitites and novel biologic entities and eight months for priority review NMEs and NBEs.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/9HnTR7tPEMQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/estimated-fda-user-fee-review-goals-for-pending-ndasblas?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{81B9F9D5-89F2-421E-9FE3-116DEB4DED08}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/s_s6OW8NBTA/complete-response-letters</link><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>“Complete Response” Letters</title><description>FDA stopped issuing “approvable” and “not approvable” letters in favor of “complete response” letters on Aug. 11, 2008. The following chart lists “complete response” actions that were recently announced, as well as still-pending “approvable” and “not approvable” actions.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/s_s6OW8NBTA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/complete-response-letters?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{1B97E805-D880-44DD-8200-CE9C4ECA797D}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/PW9FD2A196k/emkadcylaem-reviewers</link><category domain="Subjects">Manufacturing</category><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Breast Cancer</category><title>Kadcyla Reviewers</title><description>FDA staff that participated in the review of Genentech’s ado-trastuzumab emtansine.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/PW9FD2A196k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/emkadcylaem-reviewers?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{552AD3A8-FCD5-49A5-BE06-6989E7480CFF}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/DA2uXub00Kw/emkadcylaem-development-timeline</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Breast Cancer</category><title>Kadcyla Development Timeline</title><description>A chronology of events leading to the approval of Genentech’s antibody-drug conjugate ado-trastuzumab emtansine.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/DA2uXub00Kw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/emkadcylaem-development-timeline?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{EBE14D9F-27DE-44F4-8E11-1B1A6466775D}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ag5XhgXK8t0/2013-fda-advisory-committee-recommendations</link><category domain="Subjects">Advisory Committees</category><category domain="Regions">United States</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>2013 FDA Advisory Committee Recommendations</title><description>Year-to-date tracking of drug review recommendations from FDA advisory panels, including regulatory actions.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ag5XhgXK8t0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/2013-fda-advisory-committee-recommendations?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0D0C87BD-7227-435A-B3C9-CBA1845200AE}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/70w2ZR9UEik/new-molecular-entities-approved-in-2013</link><category domain="Subjects">Product Approvals</category><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Subjects">NDAs</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>New Molecular Entities Approved In 2013</title><description>Annual listing of novel drugs cleared by FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/70w2ZR9UEik" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/new-molecular-entities-approved-in-2013?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{40B56E88-1D9E-4141-87CA-86CBC3BA05E6}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/geT43yCEaU0/biologics-approved-in-2013</link><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Subjects">Product Approvals</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Industries">Biotechnology</category><title>Biologics Approved In 2013</title><description>FDA transferred review of most therapeutic biologics to the Center for Drug Evaluation &amp;amp; Research in 2003. The Center for Biologics Evaluation &amp;amp; Research continues to review other biologics, including vaccines, cellular products, antitoxins and immunoglobulins.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/geT43yCEaU0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/4/biologics-approved-in-2013?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0EFDF5A1-B557-4F03-84C1-12E0E0BDACEA}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/d5OqJASh9Ak/emaubagioem-approval-reflects-fdas-evolving-view-on-multiple-sclerosis-drugs</link><author>s.sutter@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">NDAs</category><category domain="Regions">United States</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Industries">Branded Prescription</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Multiple Sclerosis</category><title>Aubagio Approval Reflects FDA’s Evolving View On Multiple Sclerosis Drugs</title><description>Sanofi’s teriflunomide is indicated broadly for treating relapsing forms of MS. The claim marks a departure from previously approved MS drugs, in which the specific effects seen in clinical trials are described in the Indications section.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/d5OqJASh9Ak" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:05:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/emaubagioem-approval-reflects-fdas-evolving-view-on-multiple-sclerosis-drugs?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{0B9843CA-2B95-436C-9519-910D21B967DB}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/B8e6I15EKPE/beyond-hormone-therapy-signs-of-life-in-pipeline-for-menopausal-women</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Gynecology</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Contraceptive</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Endometriosis</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Fibroids</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Hormone Replacement</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Menopause</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Obstetrics</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Female</category><title>Beyond Hormone Therapy: Signs Of Life In Pipeline For Menopausal Women</title><description>Conditions associated with menopause represent a huge market, yet the R&amp;amp;D pipeline has long been slim, despite the well-known drawbacks of marketed hormone replacement therapies. But new approaches with a tissue-selective estrogenic effect are emerging: Shionogi’s Osphena for menopause-related sexual dysfunction broke the long drought in NME approvals, and Pfizer’s broad NDA for bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens is under review.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/B8e6I15EKPE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:03:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/beyond-hormone-therapy-signs-of-life-in-pipeline-for-menopausal-women?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{F041B4D3-D24F-47E2-B26A-CDF9BDFC0905}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/gyhf2VtEtCM/vertex-phase-iii-for-cf-combo-shows-power-of-breakthrough-designation</link><author>j.haas@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Drug Approval Standards</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Cystic Fibrosis</category><title>Vertex Phase III For CF Combo Shows Power Of “Breakthrough” Designation</title><description>Pivotal trials for the combination of Kalydeco and VX-809 will measure safety and efficacy over 24 weeks, whereas Kalydeco monotherapy gained FDA approval on the basis of 56 weeks of data; Vertex and FDA developed the protocol together following a recent “breakthrough therapy” designation for the two-drug combo.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/gyhf2VtEtCM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/vertex-phase-iii-for-cf-combo-shows-power-of-breakthrough-designation?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{932E2D1B-EE89-46FD-9BF9-430C8F2DA1C7}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/dz8bn6XNBOQ/fda-looked-to-emaravaems-safety-experience-in-gauging-emaubagioems-risks</link><author>s.sutter@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">NDAs</category><category domain="Regions">United States</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Industries">Branded Prescription</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Multiple Sclerosis</category><title>FDA Looked To Arava’s Safety Experience In Gauging Aubagio’s Risks</title><description>Agency’s assessment of teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis incorporated the known safety data for leflunomide, a chemically related drug with an extensive post-marketing record in rheumatoid arthritis. Despite hepatotoxicity and other safety concerns with the older drug, its clinical experience provided reassurance that Aubagio’s risks could be managed without a REMS.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/dz8bn6XNBOQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:30:00 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/fda-looked-to-emaravaems-safety-experience-in-gauging-emaubagioems-risks?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{679883E7-2D67-4433-8B3B-089A6B33021D}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/TntKefQwdUg/emaubagioem-clinical-development</link><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Pre-Market Regulation</category><category domain="Subjects">NDAs</category><category domain="Regions">United States</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Industries">Branded Prescription</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Multiple Sclerosis</category><title>Aubagio Clinical Development</title><description>A timeline chronicling the development history of Sanofi’s teriflunomide.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/TntKefQwdUg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:01:57 -0400</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/emaubagioem-clinical-development?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{B1F930C9-1372-4211-A9CB-B61E12FBFE2B}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/XN8GniqqTnM/nuvomallinckrodts-empennsaidem-setback-starts-clock-on-generic-launch</link><author>s.haley@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Pain</category><category domain="Tags">"complete response" letter</category><title>Nuvo/Mallinckrodt’s Pennsaid Setback Starts Clock On Generic Launch</title><description>With Nuvo’s new Pennsaid 2% formulation hung up at FDA, Apotex may be able to launch its generic of the old 1.5% formulation of the topical diclofenac product on April 1, 2014, under a settlement announced in January.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/XN8GniqqTnM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/nuvomallinckrodts-empennsaidem-setback-starts-clock-on-generic-launch?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{C71C7AA5-D4CF-4277-97EE-684BF17963DB}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/59cy-xVqDkc/apremilast-efficacy-results-disappoint-but-may-be-enough-for-commercial-success</link><author>j.haas@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Psoriasis</category><title>Apremilast Efficacy Results Disappoint But May Be Enough For Commercial Success</title><description>Celgene’s PDE-4 inhibitor met the primary endpoint in the first of two pivotal psoriasis trials, but analysts worried that the treatment effect was less than that seen in a Phase II study. Some analysts see a niche for apremilast in treatment-naïve patients before they move on to biologic therapy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/59cy-xVqDkc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/apremilast-efficacy-results-disappoint-but-may-be-enough-for-commercial-success?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{153C5546-B493-41C1-BA9B-C89AF1A4500A}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/RybPORAfy-o/current-class-of-risk-evaluation-amp-mitigation-strategies</link><category domain="Subjects">Risk Management</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>Current Class Of Risk Evaluation &amp; Mitigation Strategies</title><description>Here is a general outline of the REMS FDA has mandated so far, as well as a listing of drugs where it has been announced that REMS are being developed or drugs with safety issues that could invoke a REMS.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/RybPORAfy-o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/current-class-of-risk-evaluation-amp-mitigation-strategies?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{7558CEA3-1EC1-426F-B2A4-F866380CD78D}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ZzY2vCVgSaE/emaubagioem-reviewers</link><category domain="Subjects">NDAs</category><category domain="Regions">United States</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Industries">Branded Prescription</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Multiple Sclerosis</category><title>Aubagio Reviewers</title><description>FDA staff that participated in the review of Sanofi’s multiple sclerosis drug teriflunomide.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ZzY2vCVgSaE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/emaubagioem-reviewers?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{C2450783-2C5C-4648-8A45-E3F9030D5C4A}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/S45iiACQuEk/emheplisavems-hopes-for-us-approval-could-rest-on-narrower-population</link><author>s.sutter@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Drug Approval Standards</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Hepatitis B</category><title>Heplisav’s Hopes For U.S. Approval Could Rest On Narrower Population</title><description>In a “complete response” letter for the novel, adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine, FDA cites the need for more safety data in the broad population of adults for which approval was sought; however, Dynavax says the agency appears open to considering a more restricted use, such as in patients with chronic kidney disease.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/S45iiACQuEk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/emheplisavems-hopes-for-us-approval-could-rest-on-narrower-population?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{87D71C49-F672-4101-B5BF-483B66B6F816}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/lI7-QMvTAM4/february-anda-approvals</link><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="Tags">ANDAs</category><title>February ANDA Approvals</title><description>Full and tentative generic drug approvals by FDA.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/lI7-QMvTAM4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/february-anda-approvals?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{45A2942B-E65A-4EEC-B60E-28DCB863CD9B}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/4yXqyqJBI5c/february-supplemental-approvals</link><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>February Supplemental Approvals</title><description>Chart lists efficacy supplements and labeling supplements selected by the editors of Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly. This is not a comprehensive list of all supplemental approvals.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/4yXqyqJBI5c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/february-supplemental-approvals?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{D6F72ECD-D103-4114-A95A-B3880C55AE01}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/RIyiWj5jReI/regenerating-interest-in-novel-drugs-for-postmenopausal-osteoporosis</link><author>b.silverman@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Osteoporosis</category><title>Regenerating Interest In Novel Drugs For Postmenopausal Osteoporosis</title><description>New bone-targeted agents for osteoporosis must clear significant obstacles to succeed in a highly generic market, but safety concerns with established agents like bisphosphonates and calcitonin offer a foothold. Phase III anabolic candidates from Amgen and Radius Health aim to build new bone, the holy grail of osteoporosis treatment, but R&amp;amp;D in new anti-resorptive mechanisms to halt bone breakdown also continues.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/RIyiWj5jReI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/regenerating-interest-in-novel-drugs-for-postmenopausal-osteoporosis?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{67211AD8-15E7-4D6B-B138-1533AA243EA4}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ly3AZ41l52s/rhenovia-aims-to-boost-biosimulation-use-in-cns-rampd</link><author>j.davis@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Neurology</category><title>Rhenovia Aims To Boost Biosimulation Use In CNS R&amp;D</title><description>France's Rhenovia Pharma will recruit talent in the U.S. and Europe and offer its biosimulation techniques for use in developing drugs that target CNS disease, a previously difficult area for computer modeling.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ly3AZ41l52s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/rhenovia-aims-to-boost-biosimulation-use-in-cns-rampd?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{131BCD01-9454-47A3-8B38-924A65FB9450}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/NblpcHQ_rxw/the-medicines-cos-cangrelors-full-champion-phoenix-results-bode-well-for-filing</link><author>e.hayes@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Thrombosis</category><title>The Medicines Co.’s Cangrelor’s Full CHAMPION PHOENIX Results Bode Well For Filing</title><description>After two failed studies, The Medicines Co.’s rapid-acting I.V. antiplatelet drug reduces events by more than 20% in the Phase III CHAMPION PHOENIX angioplasty trial against Plavix. However, the company is already facing demand for studies against the newer and more potent antiplatelet drugs Brilinta and Effient.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/NblpcHQ_rxw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/the-medicines-cos-cangrelors-full-champion-phoenix-results-bode-well-for-filing?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{94C547C5-D3E9-4487-915B-2DC9B2105845}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/cOcelHkEp4s/acelrx-marches-toward-nda-filing-for-pain-drugdevice</link><author>j.merrill@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Pre-Market Regulation</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Pain</category><title>AcelRx Marches Toward NDA Filing For Pain Drug-Device</title><description>The specialty pharma is planning to file an NDA in the third quarter for its sublingual sufentanil NanoTab system for pain after the first of two pivotal trials reads out positively.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/cOcelHkEp4s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/acelrx-marches-toward-nda-filing-for-pain-drugdevice?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3E1948B2-29CA-4C92-869F-7B372A23FB51}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/tsdK-6nF5pE/orion-bionetworks-ms-project-plumbs-big-data-to-revitalize-cns-drug-development</link><author>s.haley@elsevier.com</author><category domain="Subjects">Clinical Development &amp; Trials</category><category domain="Subjects">Research &amp; Development  Strategies</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Multiple Sclerosis</category><category domain="TherapeuticCategories">Neurodegenerative Disease</category><title>Orion Bionetworks MS Project Plumbs Big Data To Revitalize CNS Drug Development</title><description>A diverse group of public and private institutions has launched a precompetitive data sharing and predictive modeling effort called Orion Bionetworks, using computational biology to sift through imaging, genetic and biologic data from thousands of patients to identify the molecular underpinnings of multiple sclerosis and accelerate the pursuit of cures. Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson provided $5.4 million to fund the project.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/tsdK-6nF5pE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/orion-bionetworks-ms-project-plumbs-big-data-to-revitalize-cns-drug-development?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{EFEB56C8-8729-4B8C-A285-053C186F4A01}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/_gdjO7rDyTs/february-full-approvals</link><category domain="Subjects">Drugs</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>February Full Approvals</title><description>Full approvals of NDAs and BLAs.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/_gdjO7rDyTs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/february-full-approvals?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{4F26662B-E403-4ABC-9729-4F1FC1B0CDB9}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/KVLYcZ55qGU/complete-response-letters</link><category domain="Subjects">Regulatory</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>“Complete Response” Letters</title><description>FDA stopped issuing “approvable” and “not approvable” letters in favor of “complete response” letters on Aug. 11, 2008. The following chart lists “complete response” actions that were recently announced, as well as still-pending “approvable” and “not approvable” actions.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/KVLYcZ55qGU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/complete-response-letters?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">{3B724DF4-7155-475C-8024-42230A7E9E9F}</guid><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~3/ggweKIyBBmU/2013-fda-advisory-committee-recommendations</link><category domain="Subjects">Advisory Committees</category><category domain="Regions">United States</category><category domain="Industries">Biopharmaceuticals</category><title>2013 FDA Advisory Committee Recommendations</title><description>Year-to-date tracking of drug review recommendations from FDA advisory panels, including regulatory actions.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PharmaceuticalApprovalsMonthly/~4/ggweKIyBBmU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><source url="http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly">Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly</source><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/pharmaceutical-approvals-monthly/18/3/2013-fda-advisory-committee-recommendations?elsca2=rss&amp;elsca1=pam</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
