<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 03:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Biogen</category><category>GSK</category><category>Vivus</category><category>Arena</category><category>FDA</category><category>Sanofi</category><category>Astra Zeneca</category><category>Novartis</category><category>Orexigen</category><category>influenza vaccines</category><category>Acorda</category><category>Merck</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>Facet</category><category>Fampridine</category><category>Ironwood</category><category>Lorcaserin</category><category>MannKind</category><category>Targacept</category><category>Tysabri</category><category>Afresa</category><category>Gilead</category><category>Linactolide</category><category>Qnexa</category><category>Roche</category><category>Teva</category><category>biocryst</category><category>biosimilars</category><category>peramivir</category><category>pharma stock</category><category>Addex</category><category>Allergan</category><category>Amgen</category><category>Anthrax</category><category>Avandafil</category><category>Biotech</category><category>Cephalon</category><category>Cialis</category><category>Crestor</category><category>Dr. Reddy's</category><category>Elan</category><category>Eli Lilly</category><category>Human Genome Sciences</category><category>IPO</category><category>Javelin</category><category>MS</category><category>Novavax</category><category>NovoNordisk</category><category>Otsuka</category><category>PML</category><category>Quintiles</category><category>Viagra</category><category>Xenoport</category><category>biologics</category><category>biotech stock</category><category>clinical trials</category><category>investing</category><category>nabi</category><category>zegerid</category><category>ALS</category><category>Abbott</category><category>Actemra</category><category>ActiPatch</category><category>Advair</category><category>Aldagen</category><category>Allegra</category><category>Alzheimer's</category><category>Amylin</category><category>Anthera</category><category>Appendicitis</category><category>Arbaclofen</category><category>AspenBio</category><category>Aveed</category><category>BSD medical</category><category>Benylsta</category><category>BioElectronics</category><category>Bristol Mysers Squibb</category><category>COPD</category><category>Cadence</category><category>Caldolor</category><category>Chattem</category><category>Contrave</category><category>Crucell</category><category>Cubist Pharmaceuticals</category><category>Cumberland</category><category>Cytos</category><category>Denosumab</category><category>Depomed</category><category>Dimebon</category><category>Dyloject</category><category>Edwards Life Sciences</category><category>Effexor</category><category>Emergent Biosolutions</category><category>Endo</category><category>Fanapt</category><category>FluBlok</category><category>Forest</category><category>Gardasil</category><category>Genmab</category><category>Genzyme</category><category>H1N1</category><category>Histogen</category><category>ICON</category><category>Intercell</category><category>Isis</category><category>JUPITER</category><category>Levitra</category><category>Lipitor</category><category>MedImmune</category><category>Medco</category><category>Medicis</category><category>Myriad</category><category>NDA</category><category>NanoBio</category><category>Naproxinod</category><category>NeurogesX</category><category>Nexbio</category><category>Niaspan</category><category>NicOx</category><category>NicVAX</category><category>Omerus</category><category>Optimer</category><category>PDE-5 inhibitor</category><category>PPD</category><category>Parexel</category><category>PharmAthene</category><category>Pharma War</category><category>Plavix</category><category>Protein Sciences</category><category>Qutenza</category><category>Serada</category><category>Seroquel</category><category>Shionogi</category><category>Silenor</category><category>SkyePharma</category><category>Somaxon</category><category>Tamiflu</category><category>Tasimelteon</category><category>Theravance</category><category>Trius</category><category>Vanda</category><category>Victoza</category><category>Weight Loss</category><category>Wellbutrin</category><category>Zeita</category><category>Zetia</category><category>Zyprexa</category><category>approvals</category><category>attorney general</category><category>cancer research</category><category>cardiovascular trials</category><category>clinical hold</category><category>comparator trials</category><category>dainippon</category><category>head to head trials</category><category>heat therapy</category><category>hyperthermia therapy</category><category>insulin</category><category>liraglutide</category><category>lupus</category><category>neuralstem</category><category>new drug</category><category>patents</category><category>pivotal phase III</category><category>prevacid</category><category>price gouging</category><category>race/ethnicity</category><category>reform</category><category>schering plough</category><category>sepracor</category><category>social media</category><category>stem cells</category><title>PharmaShark</title><description>Not so detailed news/notes/analysis of happenings in the pharma/biotech/clinical research realm....a chip off the New Box
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Brought to you by A New Box.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (E)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>79</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-2351437409831516418</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-02-14T13:47:28.976-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Abbott</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cadence</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cephalon</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Edwards Life Sciences</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Roche</category><title>Have a heart, it's V-Day!</title><description>It's that time of year again...Valentine's Day!  In honor of that, &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/"&gt;Seeking Alpha&lt;/a&gt; put together some nice data on 6 companies that work in the cardiac device market and in the website's opinion are making the right decisions.  The basic take home message: Abbott and Edwards Life Sciences look like the strongest buys of the six.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/188301-six-heart-related-stocks-making-good-strategic-decisions"&gt;Check it out for yourself!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cadence Pharmaceuticals will have to wait just a big longer before it's IV acetaminophen his the market.  The NDA was sent back to the company after "deficiencies" were noted by the FDA at the company's drug manufacturing facility.  I think this is just a minor bump in the road, and that the drug itself represents an unmet need in the market for treating not just pain, but also fever in patients who can't take pills.  Look for Cadence to resubmit as soon as the problems are ironed out and an approval to follow thereafter....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/cadence-pharmaceuticals-receives-complete-response-letter-fda-intravenous-acetamino-0"&gt;Cadence press release, courtesy of Fierce Biotech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roche has announced some very promising results of late stage trials for its new Type 2 Diabetes drug taspoglutide, which could translate into a potential blockbuster if the drug makes it to market.  This drug would be the first weekly GLP-1 analogue treatment available and would be a new treatment option for diabetics who could potentially control blood sugar levels with a once weekly treatment of this new medication.  Watch this one closely as new effective diabetic treatments always generate a lot of press...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Business Week reports on the Roche's results at &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-11/roche-s-diabetes-drug-meets-goals-in-five-studies-update2-.html"&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally Cephalon reported last week that it had a substantial increase in 4th quarter profits...pretty impressive considering the state of the bioech market.  You can chalk that up to increased sales for almost every marketed drug and with Nuvigil jumping fully on board in 2010, this trend may continue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more at this &lt;a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Cephalon-4Q-profit-jumps-on-apf-2871780004.html?x=0&amp;.v=1"&gt;AP article via Yahoo! Finance&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/02/have-heart-its-v-day.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-999884427438672507</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-02-10T20:43:39.308-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Crucell</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Elan</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GSK</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">patents</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PML</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sanofi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tysabri</category><title>Time's Up!</title><description>Everyone's talking about the upcoming patent cliff next year...well the downward slope towards the edge starts this year:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this nifty little article by Fierce Pharma on the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com/special-reports/big-patent-expirations-2010"&gt;patent expirations for 2010&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While that patent cliff is enough to turn investors white, &lt;a href="http://www.elan.com/"&gt;Elan&lt;/a&gt; reported that it expects to have an operating profit in 2010.  This would be the first time in over 10 years that the company has turned a profit, but it says a lot that 2010 would be year for that amidst all the financial uncertainty out there.  What's the reason for this turnaround?  Tysabri seems to be the culprit, and you can expect sales to rise as this drug shrugs off PML concerns in favor of its effectiveness....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE6190JV20100210"&gt;Reuters reports here on the profit projection&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally while many companies like GSK and Sanofi are cutting R&amp;D budgets, &lt;a href="http://www.crucell.com/Contact%20Us"&gt;Crucell&lt;/a&gt; said it is expanding operations in R&amp;D to keep pace with rivals and expand its robust pipeline.  2009 was a big year by itself for the European biotech, but you can expect 2010 to be even stronger with this increased investment in research.  This company looks like a good play considering the state of the industry around it...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reuters &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idCNLDE61505520100209?rpc=44"&gt;discusses Crucell here&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/02/times-up.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-5055335759554217031</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-02-08T22:31:30.283-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biogen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FDA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Optimer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tysabri</category><title>Tysabri Back in the News</title><description>The FDA is hitting Biogen's Tysabri with another warning for its label as new data shows that patients receiving infusions of the powerful MS drug are more likely to develop the potentially lethal brain infection PML as they receive more infusions.   The information suggests that the number of infusions received is directly proportional to the risk of contracting PML, but it's hard to say whether or not this will affect use of the drug.  It's a known fact that many people think Tysabri is the most effective MS treatment and patients are willing to take the 1 in 1000 risk of developing PML in exchange for a better quality of life.  Biogen's stock may suffer initially, but not for long as the overall outlook of Tysabri looks good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/fda-drug-safety-communication-risk-progressive-multifocal-leukoencephalopathy-pml-use"&gt;FDA advisory here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next health care reform may be stalling, but there are some rumblings in the Senate of an interesting plan to help promote biotechs to continue developing expensive ground breaking products.  A senator from New Jersey is proposing a biotech tax credit that would help cut R&amp;D costs by up to 50% if a project is deemed to meet a yet unmet medical need or has the potential to cut healthcare costs.  This is a very interesting proposition, and not surprisingly it has been greeted warmly by the biotech industry.  During a time where biotechs are struggling for cash and investors have tight wallets, such legislation could be a boon for the industry.  Keep an eye out as this moves along through the Senate....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more at &lt;a href="http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2010/02/health_care_legislation_could.html"&gt;NJ.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Optimer has created a new antibiotic for the common bacteria C.diff that seems to be at least as effective as a commonly used treatment for the potentially lethal infection.  What does this mean for Optimer?  Buyout talks of course.  Because the drug has shown promise in another pivotal trial, suitors could come out of the woodwork to get a piece of this drug that has potential to really get a solid foothold in the antibiotic market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2010/02/08/optimer-rises-on-takeover-buzz-and-clinical-trial-results-still-wrestling-with-business-risks/?single_page=true"&gt;Xconomy offers insight here&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/02/tysabri-back-in-news.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-3119305198598011164</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-02-03T22:53:38.679-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Eli Lilly</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GSK</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ironwood</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Teva</category><title>The Day After...</title><description>Ironwood's IPO did not turn out exactly as planned when the company did not quite reach the price per share amount for which it was hoping.  This could could put the brakes on any pending IPOs in the biotech world as they wait and see what happens to Ironwood.  Best care scenario is that investors were just tentative and did not jump in on stock at the first call, but will come around in a few weeks.  Worst case scenario is that investors are still scarred by the financial happenings over the past year and won't budge.  Either way, Ironwood will have to wait and see what goes down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here in &lt;a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2010/02/03/ironwood-pharma-ipo-price-cut-could-be-only-half-the-story/"&gt;Xconomy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, the Canadian company Labopharm scored a FDA approval today for its once daily version of trazodone.  The approval is good for the manufacturer, but I wonder just how big the market is going to be for this drug.  Trazodone is not a new medication, and in the anti-depressant world it faces stiff competition from other, newer meds.  Nevertheless, somebody will use it as sales are projected in the $30-$40 million range.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here fromhttp://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0313639620100203&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not secret that a battle is brewing over legislation on how to protect the intellectual property of biologics.  Well, Teva is moving forward with a biosimilar for a populat Amgen drug, Neupogen, and it hopes to get FDA approval to produce and market the product.  How will Teva go about this with no real biosimilar regulations in place?  The answer is that Teva is treating its drug as a entirely new product with a new BLA...interesting idea.  If the FDA looks favorably on this new biologic, expect Teva to pull in some serious cash.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/teva-submits-biosimilar-amgen-blockbuster-fda-approval/2010-02-02"&gt;Fierce Biotech reports on the situation here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last, but not least: Seeking Alpha published a nice blog on the differences between Eli Lilly's new R&amp;D program and GSK's program.  Both have their advantages, but I'll let you decide which one you like better!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/186360-eli-lilly-and-glaxosmithkline-a-tale-of-two-different-pharmas"&gt;Seeking Alpha Blog&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/02/day-after.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-4571280091965054047</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-02-01T23:29:18.927-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Astra Zeneca</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biotech</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FDA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GSK</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IPO</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ironwood</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Linactolide</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Otsuka</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pharma stock</category><title>another IPO...</title><description>After some time of speculation, Ironwood announced that it will go forward with a big time IPO this week that will hopefully finance the company's push towards finalizing development and commercialization of its lead drug linaclotide.  Analysts seem to think the drug is a can't miss prospect, but with the mercurial nature of the stock market and investors lately, the IPO is not a sure thing.  Along with Otsuka's planned IPO, I like this one...not a huge risk because the company has already started to prove its worth in R&amp;D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/will-ironwoods-267m-ipo-gamble-pay/2010-02-01"&gt;Read more here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And as many of you know, GSK announced today that it is going to cut about 4000 jobs in research and development, right on the heels of Astra Zeneca's statement that they were cutting 8000 workers.  Similar to AZ, GSK will be doing the majority of the job cuts in the US and Europe while it works to expand its presence in developing markets.  However GSK will still have a focus on developing new products in house...it seems just not with the same fervor as before.   This clearly isn't good news for those GSK employees in the US, but is a clear indication of the changing markets of pharma and biotech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/health/article7009597.ece"&gt;The Times reports here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And finally for some lighter reading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/special-reports/top-10-biopharma-deals-2009"&gt;Here's a nice piece by Fierce Biotech on the top 10 deals in 2009&lt;/a&gt;  and one from &lt;a href="http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10006399/biotech-events-to-watch-in-2010-fda-approvals-expected-deals-and-surprises/?tag=shell;content"&gt;BNet on upcoming FDA decisions and happenings in the biotech world&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/02/another-ipo.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-4230242460667025766</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-30T11:49:59.794-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Astra Zeneca</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IPO</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Otsuka</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pfizer</category><title>AZ drops the ax</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.astrazeneca.com/"&gt;Astra Zeneca &lt;/a&gt;has started the 2010 bloodletting by announcing 8000 layoffs as it attempts to reduce costs ahead of anticipated drops in revenue over the next few years.  AZ had already announced about 13000 job cuts which, coupled with newly announced plans, will certainly amount to significant financial increases.  However R&amp;D is also going to be affected as AZ said that it will be consolidating it's in house development projects in favor of looking elsewhere to establish partnerships with other companies on promising products.  One thing of note is that AZ is following in Pfizer's footsteps by trimming down its internal R&amp;D focus areas to concentrate on a smaller number of products instead of a shotgun approach.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/epic/azn/7093322/AstraZeneca-to-cut-a-further-8000-jobs-to-slash-costs.html"&gt;Read more in the UK publication, the Telegraph&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's usually small biotechs that make news when they announce plans to go public.  This time though, it's a bit different as &lt;a href="http://www.otsuka-us.com/oapi/default.asp"&gt;Otsuka&lt;/a&gt; plans to go public sometime soon.  According to Reuters this would make Otsuka the 4th biggest drug firm by value and serves to be a good investing opportunity for people usually hesitant about buying into an IPO because Otsuka already has a number of marketed products along with a &lt;a href="http://www.otsuka-us.com/oapi/OAPIPipeline.asp"&gt;good R&amp;D pipeline&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTOE60R05F20100128"&gt;The Reuters article is here&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/az-drops-ax.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-4821704412823361565</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-27T22:35:30.891-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">biologics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">influenza vaccines</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">NovoNordisk</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pfizer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Victoza</category><title>Novo's time to shine</title><description>Yesterday the FDA approved a potential blockbuster diabetes drug manufactured by &lt;a href="http://www.pfizer.com/home/"&gt;Novo Nordisk &lt;/a&gt;after a very lengthy 21 month review period.  The medication is called Victoza and it represents a new class of treatments for diabetes that work by stimulating insulin release from pancreatic cells.  This may not seem like a novel idea, but Victoza only stimulates insulin release when blood sugar levels are high, which is a significant functional improvement over other diabetes treatments.  Expect Novo to benefit for a long time from this medication, not only in terms of US sales but worldwide, as the drug is already approved in Europe and Japan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Read more about the approval and Victoza &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/novo-nordisk-receives-us-approval-victoza-liraglutide-treatment-type-2-diabetes-regul"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What happens when two big pharma companies merge?  Well you get lots of job cuts and a bigger-than=necessary development pipeline.  That's exactly what happened with &lt;a href="http://www.pfizer.com/home/"&gt;Pfizer&lt;/a&gt;, so the pharma giant announced that it was chopping 100 drugs in development from it's pipeline...trimming the fat if you will.  Look for Pfizer to continue to make cuts as it concentrates on only a few different therapeutic areas with larger numbers of biologics and vaccines, compounds that are expensive to develop yet extremely profitable once approved... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LA Times discusses the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/new-fda-drugmakers-tone-down-dtc/2010-01-27"&gt;culling here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally with the Obama administration came a new FDA.  Well, after a year or so of the new FDA leadership it seems that drug manufacturers are taking fewer risks with advertising aimed directly at consumers (DTC ads, as they're known).  There have been several examples of the FDA sending out scathing warning letters to manufacturers identifying the promotion of incorrect or misleading drug information directly to patients.  It seems that the rest of industry has learned from those companies that fell on the FDA's sword, and you can expect to see even fewer ads on TV, the radio, and other forms of mass media as we breeze through 2010...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=aVe6AAgRw_0Y"&gt;Bloomberg writes on the topic in this article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/novos-time-to-shine.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-7713571535956664791</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-25T21:57:56.022-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Acorda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fampridine</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GSK</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Teva</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wellbutrin</category><title>What a difference a day makes</title><description>On Friday the FDA announced approval of Acorda's new MS drug.  As expected stock prices jumped and now Acorda is the subject of numerous buyout rumors.  This certainly bodes well for investors as they get a double treat.  Experts seem to think the time is right for a company with a vested interest in MS to snatch up Acorda along with the promising new drug, Fampridine.  It makes sense to me...why not market a front line therapy such as Avonex and couple it with Fampridine to help deal with walking dysfunction?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more from &lt;a href="http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10006264/will-an-acquisition-follow-acordas-fda-approval-for-multiple-sclerosis-drug/"&gt;BNet here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the FDA says that generics are equivalent to brand name drugs, but what if they're not.  Multiple complaints that generic Wellbutrin is inferior to the real thing sprouted a study conducted by Teva, who makes the generic version, to prove that the drugs are the same.  Obviously Teva is out to prove that their version of Wellbutrin is essentially the same as the brand name, but what if it's not?  Can you imagine what that will do for brand name manufacturers?  I think that it could set off a string of studies comparing effectiveness of all different types of medications, and could set the generics industry into a frenzy.  Just like always, we'll have to wait and see...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a piece on the situation &lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/will-generic-wellbutrin-live-brand/2010-01-25"&gt;from Fierce Pharma&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And finally some good news for consumers and the vaccine industry (usually those don't go hand in hand).  GSK has promised to price its new Malaria vaccine at a reasonable price "just above cost" (which could mean anything really, but that's not the point).  The British pharma giant is planning on making its Malaria vaccine, once approved, available to those who need it.  The issue is that those who need it are those who can't afford it, so GSK is slashing the price of the vaccine to increase availability.  This is a smart move for GSK for a couple reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)good PR move&lt;br /&gt;
2)good financial move.  I think the lowered cost will be covered by increased sales to people/countries who  might otherwise not be able to afford the shot.  Even better: proceeds will be funneled back to research.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out more in the &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/06aec026-062d-11df-8c97-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1"&gt;Financial Times on the situation&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/what-difference-day-makes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-5937622215531288243</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-23T20:20:19.944-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Acorda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fampridine</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Histogen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Silenor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Somaxon</category><title>Finally!</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.acorda.com/"&gt;Acorda&lt;/a&gt; finally got what it's been looking for: an FDA nod of approval for its pill (Ampyra or Fampridine) to aid MS patients's ability to ambulate.  I didn't think this was actually every going to happen as Acorda had to fight through one unsuccessful NDA submission and delays in the approval process.  While the data are not overwhelming, it is in doubt that that pill can and does actually help some MS patients walk better...a significant benefit to this disease that can severely restrict ones ability to get around.  You can expect Acorda's stock to reflect this approval in a big way, and as an added bonus for the company: a &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/01/22/fda.approval.ms.drug/index.html?iref=allsearch"&gt;front page CNN.com article&lt;/a&gt; about the drug and the approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/fda-approves-ampyra-improve-walking-adults-multiple-sclerosis"&gt;release from the FDA, courtesy of Fierce Biotech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.acorda.com/pipeline.asp"&gt;Acorda's pipeline here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other news it seems there is a potential cure for baldness.  The only problem is that the public can't get it right now because of legal issues between the original developer (&lt;a href="http://www.skinmedica.com/"&gt;SkinMedica&lt;/a&gt;) and it's current developer (&lt;a href="http://www.histogen.com/"&gt;Histogen&lt;/a&gt;).  It's hard to say who's right and who's wrong, but one thing is for sure...neither company will end up suffering as much as the men out there who hate their lack of hair.  Somebody should really patch things up between those two companies so people can benefit from their collective work on this hair growth promoting product.  Ridiculous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10006247/cure-for-baldness-stalled-amid-legal-wrangling/"&gt;BNet reports on the situation here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last, but not least: Somaxon has resubmitted the NDA for its insomnia drug, Silenor.  This drug has been rejected, not once but twice by the FDA.  After meeting with agency a couple times, Somaxon thinks it has ironed out the problems and accumulated the data needed for an approval.  Somaxon would clearly benefit from an approval, and stock prices have already risen substantially.  Silenor itself is another example of an attempt at a sleep promoting drug that works without the residual sedation that plagues medications like Ambien.  Unfortunately these drugs often don't work as well as Ambien...maybe Silenor will be different.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/somaxon-provides-update-new-drug-application-silenor-treatment-insomnia and &lt;a href="http://www.somaxon.com/pages/silenor.htm"&gt;Silenor&lt;/a&gt; itself</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/finally.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-9130407041909847210</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-21T17:37:24.749-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Merck</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Novartis</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SkyePharma</category><title>Good News in the MS world</title><description>Several months ago I noted that &lt;a href="http://www.novartis.com/"&gt;Novartis&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.merck.de/en/index.html"&gt;Merck KGaA&lt;/a&gt; were in the midst of developing the first front line oral therapies for MS.  Well, now it seems that an approval of the drug is on the horizon.  Novartis has filed for approval of their drug, which goes by FTY720, in the US and Europe after seeing some very promising late stage trial data come through (Merck isn't far behind, but the FDA requested retooling of the application before accepting the NDA).  This oral MS market has huge potential for patients and manufacturers for a number of reasons, mainly coming from the promise of an effective MS therapy that isn't injectable.  &lt;br /&gt;
  The only potential drawback is one that should not be overlooked: an increased risk of infection that comes a result of the drugs mechanism of action.  It sounds eerily similar to the PML that have plagued Tysabri, but I believe that the benefit of a pill to treat MS far outweighs the risk of infection to patients.  In general, it looks like a winner...keep an eye on Novartis for the next 6 months or so...good things are likely to happen!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's the &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601202&amp;sid=a4Zp2AkZru8w"&gt;article from Bloomberg &lt;/a&gt;for more info&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Novartis was basking in the light of a promising future for its drug, SkyePharma is trying to put out the flames after the FDA rejected the NDA for its lead drug candidate, Flutiform.  The asthma drug may not be completely finished though, as the FDA said that it needed additional information about the drug in the form of more clinical studies before regulatory action can be taken.  I wouldn't touch SkyePharma for now...wait and see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/skyepharma-flutiform-u-s-nda-update"&gt;The company's news release here&lt;/a&gt; for you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and if you're interested in &lt;a href="http://www.skyepharma.com/products/pipeline-products/Inhalation-products/flutiform.html"&gt;flutiform...read up here&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/good-news-in-ms-world.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-1236637139267582887</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-19T22:40:21.320-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Appendicitis</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">AspenBio</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Depomed</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serada</category><title>AspenBio?</title><description>AspenBio is in prime position for a big year, at least according to &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/"&gt;Seeking Alpha&lt;/a&gt;.  This small biotech company is developing a new diagnostic test for appendicitis that allegedly can give a result in 15 minutes.  A diagnostic kit that could diagnose the potentially fatal condition without the use of expensive CT scans or ultrasounds would really be a boon for all sectors of the healthcare industry.  AspenBio benefits because their product would likely be used everywhere, Insurance companies would benefit because they wouldn't have to foot the bill for CT scans when a small, local lab kit would do the trick, Patients would benefit because they wouldn't have to pony up a percentage of the CT scan for the same reason as mentioned previously.  Basically put, it's a win-win situation for all parties.  The only issue is whether the data presented by AspenBio are enough for the FDA to approve this new device...we should have an answer sometime next month.  In the meantime, why not get a piece of the company...it's only running about 3 bucks/share.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.aspenbioinc.com/"&gt;AspenBio's website&lt;/a&gt; for more&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...and &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/183146-aspenbio-pharma-poised-for-a-breakout-year"&gt;Seeking Alpha's&lt;/a&gt; take on the new diagnostic test&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If at first you don't succeed....&lt;a href="http://www.depomedinc.com/"&gt;Depomed&lt;/a&gt; is taking that to heart by rolling out another phase III trial of it's hotflash drug, Serada.  In the fall of last year, Depomed announced disappointing results from 2 different late stage trials that missed about 75% of their primary endpoints after 3 months of treatment.  This next study is slated to start in April and Depomed is hopeful that it will finally yield results that lead to an FDA nod of approval for Serada.  I just wonder how much tweaking study designs will really beget a meaningful result.  It's great that this has potential to be first non-hormone treatment for hot flashes (a real unmet need for women), but where should Depomed draw the line?  What happens if this trial is no more successful than the previous two?  Only time will tell, I suppose...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/depomed-comments-fda-guidance-and-plans-one-additional-trial-evaluating-non-hormona-0"&gt;Depomed press release &lt;/a&gt;here</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/aspenbio.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-3921932821299675012</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-17T23:08:36.396-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">biologics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">biosimilars</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">reform</category><title>12 years?  seems like a long time....</title><description>Caught up in all the health care reform battles is the war to establish patent protection for biologics produced by biotech and pharma companies.  The premise is simple: the manufacturers want  12 years protection from biosimilars (the biologics version of generics), some democrats (including President Obama and Senator Waxman) and generics manufacturers want less.  On the surface it seems that less protection would benefit consumers because biologics, while generally effective therapies, are typically very expensive to patients.  This is because they are expensive to develop, often involving proprietary processes and many years to bring from the lab to the market.  Manufacturers are arguing that the only way they can recoup the losses of developing the biologics is to have a longer period of patent protection on the product before it is opened to competition from biosimilars.&lt;br /&gt;
  At first I was all for legislation reducing the length of time for protection, but the more that I consider the problem, the more I feel that 12 years is fair.  The way that I look at it, if companies feel that developing biologics (some of the most effective auto-immune treatment available today are biologics, by the way) is cost-prohibitive because patent protection is lost too quickly, then developers may abandon the production of these important treatments.  Furthermore the production of biologics is a very labor intensive and scientifically complex matter, and any competition would likely have to undertake similar expensive manufacturing techniques just to produce a biosimilar.  That being said, companies that invest the time and money into producing biologics should have 12 years of market exclusivity for their treatment.  &lt;br /&gt;
  As for the cost of the biologics, I think that future improvements in manufacturing techniques along with competition from other manufacturers will help control the cost of biologics, but these treatments will always be more expensive than standard medications.  It's hard to say how this battle will play out, but neither side will go down without a fight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more in &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/14/AR2010011403612.html"&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/12-years-seems-like-long-time.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-1139505377230528572</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-14T09:15:05.355-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Advair</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Afresa</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biogen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GSK</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MannKind</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tysabri</category><title>Can't keep a good Mann(Kind) down</title><description>Nevermind that the FDA said it will miss its self imposed Jan. 16th deadline for action on &lt;a href="http://www.mannkindcorp.com/"&gt;MannKind's&lt;/a&gt; inhaled insulin.  Nevermind that the agency has yet to complete inspection of the company's manufacturing facility.  MannKind remains optimistic that their product will clear that final hurdle and get good news within "days" of the completed facility inspection.  In a world full of cautious optimism, MannKind's belief in their product is great, but how would they handle a negative FDA response to Afresa?  I guess we'll find out one way or another within the next few weeks...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idCNN1221038220100113?rpc=44"&gt;Reuters reports here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, some good news for &lt;a href="http://www.biogenidec.com/"&gt;Biogen &lt;/a&gt;and the much beleaguered Tysabri.  The company said reported that Tysabri's sales exceeded $1 billion for the first time ever in 2009, essentially elevating the biologic to "blockbuster" status (i guess you could call it the equivalent of going platinum).  I think this speaks wonders for the drug because patients/physicians seem to believe pretty strongly in Tysabri in spite of the continuous presence of PML.  Unless the incidence of PML or other problems spikes unexpectedly, I would plan on Tysabri being around for the long haul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aTo8MkvBZ0Ss"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
See more from Bloomberg on Biogen's Tysabri announcement... &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Must be nice if you market a &lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com/slideshows/top-20-bestselling-drugs?img=3"&gt;top 15 drug&lt;/a&gt; with no legit competition on the horizon.  That seems to be the case with Advair, at least according to GSK.  Several potential asthma drugs have gotten the chop lately by the FDA and GSK does not think that any generics will rise to challenge Advair when its patent expires in 2011. Pretty good news I'd say, and not something that you hear everyday with the surge in generics lately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/witty-no-rivals-coming-advair/2010-01-13"&gt;Fierce Pharma talks about it here&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/cant-keep-good-mannkind-down.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-2697170347329234745</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-12T22:01:47.875-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Actemra</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">H1N1</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">influenza vaccines</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Novartis</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Roche</category><title>A new treatment for RA...</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.roche.com/index.htm"&gt;Roche&lt;/a&gt; got good news when the FDA approved Actemra for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in adults.  What's good for Roche (formally Genentech's product by the way) is that Actemra is the first in a new class of monoclonal antibodies, so basically if it proves to effective it will have free reign on the market for some time.  There is some heavy competition in the RA field though with Remicade, Humira, and others being staples in the market for several years now.  Keep an eye on this drug, Roche looks to make a significant splash with this one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the Press Release &lt;a href="http://www.gene.com/gene/news/press-releases/display.do?method=detail&amp;id=12567"&gt;here from Genentech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other day I mentioned Novartis working to acquire Alcon in an effort to expand and diversify their assests.  If you're interested the folks at &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/181779-novartis-eyes-an-opportunity-in-alcon"&gt;Seeking Alpha have expounded a bit more on this developing merger&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally this whole H1N1 thing may end up backfiring on vaccine manufacturers, regardless of the intentions of the companies.  First the H1N1 outbreak tapered off significantly in late November/December, then vaccine surpluses began to emerge as public interest faded.  Now, countries are &lt;a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE60A26C20100111?rpc=401&amp;feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=companyResultsNews&amp;rpc=401"&gt;slashing their vaccine orders&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://www.pharmatimes.com/WorldNews/article.aspx?id=17147&amp;src=EWorldNews"&gt;European Union is actually holding a formal investigation&lt;/a&gt; into whether or not manufacturers over-exaggerated the threat of H1N1. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't buy those threats, I think they'll do more harm than good.  Time has shown that's impossible to predict nature, and this H1N1 outbreak is a good example of this.  Better safe than sorry in my mind.</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-treatment-for-ra.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-4800216014740916266</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-11T13:53:09.410-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Afresa</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Astra Zeneca</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Avandafil</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MannKind</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sanofi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Targacept</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Vivus</category><title>One small step for Mannkind?</title><description>The other day I mentioned the sharks circling, waiting on a decision from the FDA on &lt;a href="http://www.mannkindcorp.com/"&gt;Mannkind's&lt;/a&gt; inhaled insulin.  Well, now it seems they'll be waiting around a little bit longer: the Agency said that it would miss its own January 16th deadline for a decision on the hotly debated medication, Afresa. However the delay here is not due to more data review, safety reports or things like that; rather the FDA says that it has not yet completed a thorough inspection of Mannkind's Afresa manufacturing facility.  Analysts feel that in spite of this, an approval is waiting in the wings...so don't jump off board quite yet.  Clearing this final regulatory hurdle will be huge news for Mannkind as well as insulin users across the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/01/a-step-back-for-mannkind-insulin-inhaler-is-delayed/"&gt;Pharmalot&lt;/a&gt; cogitates about the topic here....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just so you don't forget that Vivus is not a one trick pony, the company released more information on their new ED treatment and the drug, Avanafil, continues to impress.  The Phase 3 results were very impressive, showing significance compared to placebo at all doses being examined.  While Vivus is entering a tough market with several ED meds already eating up market share, perhaps the quick response time (15 minutes) of men after taking the drug will encourage some changeovers.  Keep Vivus in mind as they continue to impress...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/vivus-announces-additional-results-phase-3-avanafil-study-erectile-dysfunction-show-0"&gt;Vivus press release can be found here&lt;/a&gt;, courtesy of Fierce Biotech&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Targacept was busy making headlines over the second half of 2009 with its strong results from its new anti-depressant.  As was mentioned in the fall, Astra-Zeneca felt good enough about the results to enter in a marketing/development agreement with the NC based biotech firm.  Targacept has managed to secure its first big payment from Astra-Zeneca as part of this agreement ($200 million), so look for them to keep up the good work and continue to bring in the money.  The company's stock has risen significantly over the past year...expect that trend to continue at least until phase 3 trials are completed in the near future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here's&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/targacept-receives-200-million-upfront-payment-astrazeneca"&gt; Targacept's press release&lt;/a&gt;, again from Fierce Biotech&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, some good news for Sanofi: a new Dengue fever vaccine being developed by the French company generated sufficient protection in all 66 adults receiving the vaccine in a small study.  Just like the Malaria vaccine being examined by GSK, successful development of a Dengue fever jab will certainly have far reaching financial benefits to the manufacturer.  The only question is (if the medication is effective) how much will it cost to those who are at risk of getting sick (think people in Africa)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read all about it from &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601202&amp;sid=aE8m92O4pSQA"&gt;Bloomberg &lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/one-small-step-for-mannkind.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-2753528876569086418</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-08T23:02:43.156-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biogen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Genzyme</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Novartis</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Qnexa</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Teva</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Vivus</category><title>Another day, another positive story for Vivus</title><description>The promise of Vivus's Qnexa as a weight loss agent is well documented, but now data suggests that the combination of phenteramine and topiramate is also effective in treating sleep apnea.  However it's not a treatment for apnea in the same way that CPAP alleviates the problem, rather Qnexa causes weight loss that can improve the condition to the point where it is not a concern to the patient anymore.  Because weight loss has been known to decrease the severity of sleep apnea, any consistently positive results for Qnexa should be pretty easily result in an approval for that indication and concordantly, another revenue boost for Vivus (and whomever they up partnering with in the future).  Remember, however, that Vivus has not yet submitted a NDA for Qnexa, so all this is speculation at this time...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/vivus-announces-positive-results-phase-2-study-qnexa-obstructive-sleep-apnea"&gt;Vivus Press Release here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Teva's management is looking for some serious growth in the next five years, so much so that we may be considering the company in the same breath as Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, GSK, and other so called "big pharma."  Unlike other companies however, Teva focuses on generic drugs and they feel that increasing health care costs will drive patients to more and more generic drug use.  This, coupled with the standard diversification of the company portfolio would certainly lead to Teva becoming a much bigger player in the global drug market.  I like their plan, so hop on board, but don't expect big returns for at least several years....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read the &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601202&amp;sid=aWkfezyACFcQ"&gt;Bloomberg article&lt;/a&gt; for more insight&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe Carl Icahn has picked on Biogen long enough.  It seems that Icahn wants a big piece of Genzyme (he bought over a million shares of the company last year) and he could be interested in forcing changes at the beleaguered biotech that has certainly seen its share of problems over the past year.  Genzyme seems to have been watching Icahn's moves with Biogen and it doesn't look like they will play nice with the billionaire, but maybe they should.  As many problems as Genzyme has had lately, maybe they could use a little shakeup...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9502950"&gt;Here's the abcnews story....&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/another-day-another-positive-story-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-805802516416862598</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-06T22:13:49.865-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Effexor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gilead</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MannKind</category><title>Can anybody keep MannKind down?</title><description>As we know MannKind is developing an inhaled insulin that they hope to get approved by the FDA.  However analysts are spurning the company's confidence that the approval will come by January 16th.  One cannot argue that MannKind has every right to be optimistic: an effective inhaled insulin will be a tremendous step forward in the treatment of diabetes.  Unfortunately there is only speculation as to what will happen in the coming weeks, and it seems that analysts are taking the conservative route by advising against MannKind and Afresa (trade name for the inhaled insulin product).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here from &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601202&amp;sid=axH_uRroCPoA"&gt;Bloomberg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday I mentioned that Gilead has shown the highest margins in pharma/biotech.  Well, today the shares of Gilead jumped significantly after a phase II study of a new HIV treatment met it's primary endpoint.    I would proceed with caution based on this news, however, because this new add on therapy could very easily meet its demise in large scale Phase III studies. Let's wait and see what happens as this drug moves further in development...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/phase-ii-clinical-trial-gileads-investigational-quad-regimen-meets-24-week-primary-ob"&gt;Gilead's Press Release Here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of high margins, have you ever wondered which products generate the highest profits for manufacturers?  Well, if you haven't Pharmalot has come up with the top 10 drugs that offer the most bag for their buck for pharma/biotech and it looks like the antidepressant Effexor takes the number 1 spot.  There are some heavy hitters on the list like Lipitor and Plavix, and one can only speculate where those drugs will end up as their patents expire in the coming years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the &lt;a href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/01/which-drugs-have-the-biggest-pre-tax-margins/"&gt;Pharmalot post&lt;/a&gt; for more</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/can-anybody-keep-mannkind-down.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-7945805764511619474</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-05T21:21:21.395-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biogen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">biotech stock</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">dainippon</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gilead</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sepracor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">stem cells</category><title>Knees Rejoice!</title><description>Good news for those of us headed down the future road of joint degeneration: a study has been commissioned to examine whether or not stem cells can be used to regenerate cartilage.  The study will start in retired race horses and if the procedure works, then a similar process would presumably be effective in humans.  The potential implications of this are easy to imagine...no more suffering from cartilage loss due to sports injuries or wear-and-tear over time: just a treatment or two with regenerative stem cells to grow more tissue and back out you go to a pain free lifestyle.  Of course this idea is still is in its relative infancy, but keep an ear out in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotechresearch.com/story/scientists-set-out-regenerate-cartilage-stem-cells/2010-01-05"&gt;Fierce Biotech Research Reported that here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This next one is for you job seekers out there: Biogen is on the lookout for a new CEO after James Mullen announced that he will be retiring this year, with his last day being June 8.  This could send shockwaves through the company as they struggle with ongoing safety issues concerning Tysabri and they continue to struggle with the botched acquisition of Facet late in 2009, but maybe it was the right thing to do.  Sometimes a breath of fresh air at the top can change things for a company...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have a look at the &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2010/01/05/biogen_idec_chief_executive_to_retire/"&gt;Boston Globe piece&lt;/a&gt; for more&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heard of Dainippon?  If not, you will soon enough if their potential blockbuster schizophrenia drug is approved by the FDA in the coming months.  The Japanese company (which bought Sepracor last year) has filed a New Drug Application for lurasidone, which is supposed to work in a similar fashion to other atypical antipsychotics, but without the reported weight gain that have plagued manufacturers over the past year.  With very promising clinical trial data, look for Dainippon to move up in value in the coming weeks as a likely approval looms...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/dainippon-sumitomo-pharma-america-announces-nda-submission-lurasidone-fda-treatment-0"&gt;Fierce Biotech on the NDA submission&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And, just to make you more familiar...here's&lt;a href="http://www.ds-pharma.co.jp/english/index.html"&gt; Dainippon's website&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, for those of you investing out there: &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/180947-gilead-highest-margins-in-biotech"&gt;Seeking Alpha reports that Gilead has the highest profit margins in biotech&lt;/a&gt;, but you'd have to dig further in the AFG50 for other potential winners...</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/knees-rejoice.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-2042650043472862230</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-04T21:01:54.380-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Amgen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dr. Reddy's</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Novartis</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pfizer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sanofi</category><title>New Year!</title><description>Happy New Year, everyone!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Novartis started off 2010 with an announcement that they have agreed on a deal to purchase a majority stake in Alcon (should be familiar to those of you who wear contact lenses).  This move no doubt shows Novartis's desire to diversify and grow into new markets, specifically the fast growing eye care sector.  Just like Sanofi's takeover of Chattem a few weeks ago, Novartis is working to improve cash flow from a variety of products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here from the &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/business/global/05iht-drug.html?hp"&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And for those of your unfamiliar with Alcon, here's information from their &lt;a href="http://www.alcon.com/en/investors-media/glance.asp"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Reddy's released preliminary information suggesting that its new add-on treatment for diabetes, balaglitazone, met the primary endpoint of a key Phase III study by significantly reducing HbA1c in clinical trial participants.  Although similar to pioglizatone, this new treatment is supposed to have a positive effect on lowering HbA1c while having fewer of the negative adverse effects such as fluid retention, weight gain, and heart enlargement.  As diabetes is always a hot market for safer and more effective medications, look for Dr. Reddy's to jump with this positive news.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see the press release from &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/dr-reddys-and-rheoscience-announce-headline-results-first-phase-iii-clinical-trial-ba"&gt;Dr. Reddy's here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pfizer continues to wait (impatiently, perhaps) for a FDA ruling on the BLA submitted for Prevnar-13, an updated and allegedly more effective version of what was once Wyeth's blockbuster pneumonia vaccine, Prevnar.  This vaccine has been under review for some time now and a decision was actually due by December 30, but the FDA has extended the review period by 90 more days.  Pfizer is likely itching for this approval so they can start marketing this vaccine to build up some revenue to help fight off the effects of the upcoming patent cliff and the loss of Lipitor.  Hold off for now on Pfizer, there doesn't seem to that much promise for the time being...  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more, have a &lt;a href="http://philadelphia.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2010/01/04/daily5.html"&gt;peak here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, as a small nugget, &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0319851620100103?type=marketsNews"&gt;read here&lt;/a&gt; about Barron's predictions for the big pharma/biotech winners of the new healthcare bill...</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-year.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-5808981562752439171</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-29T08:57:45.439-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Allegra</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biotech</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chattem</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pharma stock</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sanofi</category><title>winding down</title><description>So there's not much going on the last week of a year as far as pharma/biotech is concerned...it's pretty much a known fact that most companies shut down for a few days around this time.  In light of that, I've come across a variety of articles summing up the years activities in this industry, enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10005892/the-5-worst-drug-companies-of-2009/"&gt;The 5 Worst Drug Companies of 2009 (BNet)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/look-back-2009/2009-12-23"&gt;2009 biotech news in review (&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com"&gt;Fierce Biotech&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/look-back-2009/2009-12-24"&gt;2009 in review for Pharma (&lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com"&gt;Fierce Pharma&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/179719-ipo-outlook-2010-growth-returns-to-global-markets"&gt;IPO outlook for 2010 (&lt;a href="http://www.seekingalpha.com"&gt;Seeking Alpha&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, there was one interesting development last week that is worth mentioning:  Sanofi-Aventis is buying Chattem, giving the French company a much strong market share in OTC health products. Chattem  currently  markets Gold Bond skin care products (of which I am a strong advocate), ACT mouthwash, and Icy Hot, just to name a few products.  Looks like Sanofi continues to diversify its assets as it prepares to lose several meds to the coming patent cliff.  In a related story, Sanofi will also work to move Allegra to an OTC product to directly compete with the success stories of Zyrtec and Claritin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read more here at &lt;a href="http://www.overthecountertoday.com/"&gt;OTC today&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2009/12/winding-down.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-5504281611359049567</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-26T15:28:44.936-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clinical trials</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FDA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">investing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">social media</category><title>I've got Questions, who's got answers?</title><description>Here, &lt;a href="http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/new-year-new-administration-new-fda/2009-12-23"&gt;Fierce Pharma recaps the 2009 developments in the FDA&lt;/a&gt;.  The leadership turnover is outlined, as is the first acts of the "new" as well as the pitfalls over the course of the year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Going along with this theme, here's what I am wondering for the new year:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-How will internet advertising pan out?  DTC TV ads took a beating over the first part of 2009, and with no real regulation over internet marketing, the FDA will have to issue formal guidance so manufacturers will know how to use the potentially beneficial marketing power of the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-How will social media utilization work be regulated by the FDA?  Will the FDA get a handle on social media?  We'll see...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-How will the FDA step up to the plate and increase better awareness of post marketing safety issues?  Obviously the safety collection process does not stop after a NDA is approved.  The FDA must come up with more efficient ways to monitoring post marketing adverse events and enforcing the completion of phase IV studies requested as part of a NDA approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Will the FDA work toward encouraging more trials done to compare new treatments to old ones?  This is a fallacy of the current process, just because a drug is superior to placebo does not mean it's any better than what is out there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-With the pharma/biotech industries and the government cracking down on financial arrangements made with physicians, will the FDA revise current financial disclosure regulations for clinical trials?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-How will the FDA continue to contend with increasing numbers of drug manufacturers moving operations overseas?  With increasing costs across the board, profit maximization is at a premium and this naturally leads to using more cost efficient operations...overseas if necessary.</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2009/12/ive-got-questions-whos-got-answers.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-6986726783383694906</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-23T14:55:14.810-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Arena</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cephalon</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lorcaserin</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MedImmune</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Orexigen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sanofi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Shionogi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Vivus</category><title>First one across the finish line</title><description>Looks like Arena is ready to makes its attempt at being the first of the three main developers (Arena, Orexigen, and Vivus) to get a new weight loss drug approved by the FDA.  Yesterday, they took the first step and submitted the NDA for Lorcaserin to the FDA for an approval...the waiting game begins now.  You can rest assured that not only will Vivus and Orexigen be watching closely, but also the myriad investors interested in the outcome of this submission.  As I mentioned earlier, I like Arena's long term chances with Lorcaserin, but now we get really get to see what happens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the &lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/arena-submits-us-application-for-obesity-drug-2009-12-22?reflink=MW_news_stmp"&gt;Market Watch&lt;/a&gt; report for more&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While we're on obesity meds, Shionogi remains a potential contender behind the other three companies mentioned above with its pursuit of velneperit as a weight loss agent.  As mentioned in &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601202&amp;sid=aYLoaYjH2zYg"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;, velneperit has had a rough road with little real success, but Shionogi seems to be intent on pushing the drug through as either a monotherapy or adjunct weight loss treatment.  Some things never die and it looks like this is another example of that adage...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cephalon is providing a good example of how manufacturers rein in customers for new drugs as patents for old drugs expire: they are raising the price on provigil to encourage patients to purchase their newly approved drug for the same indication (more or less), nuvigil.  It's not a new strategy by any means, but it is an effective one, and expect this trend to continue until a generic version of provigil is available in a couple years.  Until that happens, you can be sure that Cephalon will continue to reap profits from this effective wakefulness promoting agent.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/cephalon-provides-update-regulatory-review-nuvigil-treatment-excessive-sleepiness-a-0"&gt;Cephalon Press Release Here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To wrap things up: what in the world is going on with these Swine Flu vaccines?  First Sanofi recalls a big batch of its H1N1 vaccine, now MedIummune is doing the same thing.  Coincidence?  Who knows, but I think not...expect more info as the investigation continues...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read all about it &lt;a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/swineflu/news/dec2209recall.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2009/12/first-one-across-finish-line.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-6063320537020755237</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-21T14:50:51.552-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biogen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Facet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Javelin</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Myriad</category><title>Javelin hits the mark</title><description>Javelin Pharmaceuticals was snatched up by Myriad Pharmaceuticals as Myriad is aiming to further development and commercialization of Javelin's lead product: Dyloject.  Dyloject is an injectable form of the NSAID diclofenac sodium, and it gives Myriad a promising new pain treatment.  This is good news for Javelin after a rough year following the announcement that another pain therapy being developed by the small pharma company did not meet its main study goals.  Whether Myriad will continue to pursue Javelin's other drug candidates is up in the air, but I would wager that Myriad will likely focus on its own pipeline before actively working on Javelin's products. For the time being though, look for Myriad to make big strides following a favorable FDA ruling on Dyloject. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/myriad-pharmaceuticals-acquire-javelin-pharmaceuticals"&gt; Myriad press release here&lt;/a&gt;, including some good nuggets on the merger itself&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fallout from Facet's rejection of Biogen's takeover offer, as reported by Seeking Alpha.  It seems that Facet's shareholders performed well under fire as the board had desired (after the board made some concessions to the largest shareholders) by rejecting Biogen's "final" offer.  However, it seems that Facet is remaining realistic because they are still entertaining buyout offers, provided that they are above the "unreasonable" price suggested by Biogen.  As mentioned earlier, Facet is walking a thin line because if their main drugs do not pan out, they will be looking a serious financial issue.  You have to hand it to Facet for playing hard to get, but I can't say that I agree given their financial situation...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/179138-facet-rebuffs-biogen-will-a-white-knight-emerge"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; article and &lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/179032-facet-board-pleased-with-rejection-of-biogen-bid"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; one from Seeking Alpha for their perspective on the situation...</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2009/12/javelin-hits-mark.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-5047275566029739305</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-16T21:35:09.462-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Addex</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biogen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Facet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GSK</category><title>The battle begins</title><description>Earlier I mentioned that Facet had rejected Biogen's buyout offer.  Well, it seems that Biogen won't take no for an answer.  Biogen apparently wants complete control of Facet badly enough that it is willing to buy out a majority of shares and then take over the board in a sort of deathmatch (as best as I can tell).  Facet isn't biting, so it looks like a showdown is on the horizon.  Even though Facet has held strong so far, I think Biogen could and should win out here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/facet-biotechs-board-directors-reiterates-recommendation-stockholders-not-tender-17-5"&gt;Facet release&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/biogen-idec-stands-ready-close-its-17-50-all-cash-tender-offer-facet-biotech"&gt;Biogen Release&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and an &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=agNKdJ8yBe1s&amp;pos=6"&gt;outside source on the whole situation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday, I reported the looming disaster for Addex after they pulled the plug on their lead drug candidate.  Well, today the dust settled and it settled hard (expectedly) on the stock of the drugmaker...to the tune of a 75% loss.  Addex still has a promising pipeline, so now could be a good time to hop on board...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have a look at the &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BF12R20091216?type=globalMarketsNews"&gt;Reuter's story for more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, GSK has been on the warpath lately and now you can add Nanobio to the list of new partnerships with the British pharma giant.  This partnership will be centered around the further development of Nanobio's new cold sore therapy. As per the usual, the agreement also contains incentives for Nanobio upon completion of various development/commercialization milestones.  Don't expect GSK to stop anytime soon, it's a known fact that they are on the hunt for new deals...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read the story in http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/gsk-and-nanobio-announce-licensing-agreement</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2009/12/battle-begins.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7817514033757702896.post-7101287060624777627</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-15T22:57:22.218-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Addex</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gilead</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">influenza vaccines</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sanofi</category><title>Disaster for Addex?</title><description>How many companies have a potential blockbuster in development only to see those plans derailed by negative late stage testing results?  The list is long and exhausting, but Addex really hit bottom with its phase III study of a potential blockbuster GERD treatment.  Addex was all ready to make marketing deals when it pulled the plug any further development of its prime candidate: ADX10059 after recent studies indicated potentially serious elevations of liver enzymes in a number of patients exposed to the medication.  Addex obviously did what it could to palliate the damage by talking about its other pipeline products, but the damage has already been done.  I would stay away from the company for a while until the dust settles, but Addex does have a reasonable pipeline and will likely bounce back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the &lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/development-adx10059-ended-long-term-use"&gt;Addex press release here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.addexpharma.com/pipeline/"&gt;Addex Pipeline&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bad news continues for Gilead as they announced that a phase III study of its new hypertension drug, darusentan, missed primary endpoints.  However secondary endpoints were achieved, but it remains nebulous as to what degree Gilead will pursue additional development of darusentan.  I would wager that future late stage studies could be in the cards because the drug is being developed for resistant hypertension and some clever statistics could make even a small improvement over placebo seem relevant (not to mention that any treatment for this type of hypertension would be a good thing).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/second-pivotal-phase-iii-study-gileads-darusentan-resistant-hypertension-misses-prima"&gt;Gilead Release&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, a few quick news briefs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/178002-making-and-breaking-biotech-deals"&gt;ere's a nice article on wheelings and dealings in the biotech world&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/12/15/news/news-us-flu-vaccine-sanofi.html"&gt;Sanofi Pasteur recalled a number of its pediatric H1N1 vaccines&lt;/a&gt; due to a reported lack of effectiveness of the vaccines themselves, not in the response of the patients to the vaccine.  I wonder if any of this has shown up in the adult version of the shot...</description><link>http://pharmashark.blogspot.com/2009/12/disaster-for-addex.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (E)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>