<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28875595</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 08:20:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>pets</category><category>relationship</category><title>Philosophy Made Easy</title><description></description><link>http://philosophymadeeasy.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Yogendra Rawat)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28875595.post-5072959606041372553</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-26T08:25:13.930+05:30</atom:updated><title>Kant Biography : Intellectual Growth</title><atom:summary type="text">Kant is considered as one of the greatest philosopher of all time.  He himself in the preface of his magnum opus,  first published in 1781, ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ says, that in this book, there is not a single  metaphysical problem which has not been solved or the solution of which the key at least has not been supplied. 

In preface to the second edition he compares himself to Copernicus and </atom:summary><link>http://philosophymadeeasy.blogspot.com/2011/12/kant-biography-intellectual-growth.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Yogendra Rawat)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBguFKySk2yZZFrriLif3HR7X77a1EEJYFNZcK237eNBRqWXMDpmvv6uRtB88C-djrbaY08pkXnsd3kVPUeKssC5_uRw7MY0eZr4RIGvgrK8EZy8MbK4E7-S-pui_AruTBYVRk/s72-c/sublime.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>6</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28875595.post-2450798306593085739</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2020-04-11T18:47:18.539+05:30</atom:updated><title>Kant&#39;s Objection Against Ontological Argument</title><atom:summary type="text">



Anselm’s ontological argument in fact wholly depends on the definition of God. Thus, even if a single attribute can be denied to God, then the whole argument collapses. Thus an atheist has to just find out one single attribute and prove that God cannot have it, and it would be sufficient to reject the whole idea of God as a mere fantasy. 

But before we find loop holes in  Anselm’s argument </atom:summary><link>http://philosophymadeeasy.blogspot.com/2011/12/kants-objection-against-ontological.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Yogendra Rawat)</author><thr:total>7</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28875595.post-2889758921237862202</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2020-04-11T18:48:01.956+05:30</atom:updated><title>Ontological Argument for Existence of God</title><atom:summary type="text">
The first ontological argument for existence of God was developed by the&amp;nbsp;Benedictine&amp;nbsp;monk of Canterbury Anselm who was born in 1033 and died in 1109. Now before you understand his argument in his own words it’s important to understand what ontology means. Ontology in simple terms is a branch of metaphysics that deals with the nature of being. &amp;nbsp;



This is how St Anselm explains </atom:summary><link>http://philosophymadeeasy.blogspot.com/2011/12/ontological-argument-for-existence-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Yogendra Rawat)</author><thr:total>12</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28875595.post-5521789335521015201</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-11-20T21:24:54.578+05:30</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pets</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">relationship</category><title>About Pets</title><atom:summary type="text">

No One Likes A Barking Dog


If animals could only speak, no one will have them for pets.

  var _gaq = _gaq || [];
  _gaq.push([&#39;_setAccount&#39;, &#39;UA-27136691-1&#39;]);
  _gaq.push([&#39;_trackPageview&#39;]);

  (function() {
    var ga = document.createElement(&#39;script&#39;); ga.type = &#39;text/javascript&#39;; ga.async = true;
    ga.src = (&#39;https:&#39; == document.location.protocol ? &#39;https://ssl&#39; : &#39;http://www&#39;) + &#39;.</atom:summary><link>http://philosophymadeeasy.blogspot.com/2011/06/about-pets.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Yogendra Rawat)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2iZ6mwf0YMILZ546iAgPCRjScJYUZ1x4jJdXCbfECntALCNjVvhQ6GGculfg2XR9Dmgj82VuZZqT5dfcLspXEJm0EDv1i5U-SgtiAHnshlfjsKzjjedCFsULaUHIo2_t8JFHT/s72-c/Military_dog_barking.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>