However, I might be more comfortable with a permanent alien identity than that of a permanent resident of the U.S. I’ve been a permanent resident in Kenya, UK and Portugal – in how many countries can I be permanent resident in a lifetime?

Could I have a permanent computer residence do you suppose? I mean, I feel strange and non-resident in places where I don’t have my computer. Mind you, being a Mac owner isn’t much help. Too bad if you live in more than one country they remind me. You may only belong to one iTunes store, with one matching credit card. And you can only send music to people in the same country. I know Steve Jobs doesn’t listen to customers, but – I mean – whatever happened to globalization?

And films? Forget watching films from different regions of the world. I can now only watch movies from the U.S. because I’ve switched regions (on my computer) five times. Lucky I’m marrying someone who has his set on movies from regions outside the U.S. We are a perfect match.

Google, on the other hand, goes the other way. Every time you travel they change your google interface language and prioritize sites from that country. Do you think I care what they say in Amharic about cheap flights from Lisbon to Vienna as I reside – on my computer – at Addis airport between Tanzania and Thailand? No, Google, no!! Neither in Thai nor Swahili. Please could you make it less complicated to get back to a language I understand.

Anyway, all this to announce the very great news that we are getting married. Hopefully I got through all my health checks here in Lisbon yesterday – although I wasn’t clear if I should emphasize illnesses or not. I can only imagine the physical health check to enter the U.S. is a secret mental health check. After all, who in their right mind would go to the U.S. if they knew they had a health problem?

So – Etienne Wenger and I are pleased to announce our marriage in September. We have a blog with the announcement here: http://etiennebev.com

Love and happiness to all – from an alien, a legal alien… wishing happiness on all aliens squeezed into national boxes everywhere!

Monitoring and evaluation of communities of practice and networks has been a hot topic in many of the group discussions I’m involved in . Now the Open University of the Netherlands (OUNL) has published our conceptual framework for promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks. It is a working paper co-authored by Etienne Wenger, Bev Trayner and Maarten de Laat.

We wrote it with a wide audience in mind – researchers, sponsors, community leaders, members and other members. It is a framework that draws on both quantitative and qualitative data to create a compelling picture of how communities and networks create value for their members (or not).

Below is a copy of the Contents page and you can download the document here.  We will be discussing how we have been using the framework and its implications at our BEtreat workshop on the 5th – 9th July 2011.

And do let us know if you have any comments about the framework – especially if you implement it.

I’m giving a talk in May about social learning and social media (at a conference for leaders of HR) and the noise about social learning in the blog and tweetosphere is putting me off. Social learning and social media are not the same thing. Rather…

Social learning is a reflection of our view about knowledge, whereas social media is the result of a tech bubble around Web 2.0.

This century has seen a shift in our thinking about knowledge. The flow of knowledge used to be seen as being primarily one way – from the person who knew to the person who didn’t.

But theory and research has suggested otherwise. Lave and Wenger, for example, noticed that in traditional systems of tailor master-apprenticeship relationships it was the apprentice’s relations to other apprentices where they found opportunities to learn.

What’s also happening is that globalization is making our problems more complex. Any one individual’s knowledge can only ever be partial knowledge in complex situations or in dealing with complex problems. Our initial strategy in complex situations would be to create social spaces and try to synergize all these partial pieces of knowledge.

So whereas in the past there were publicly endorsed figures who acted as gate-keepers for what would pass as canonical knowledge we now look at everyone as potential knowledge-creators, piecing together bits of partial knowledge in new ways to create new meanings.

Needless to say, shared social meanings are not in the heads of individuals; they are features of the social spaces we share when we engage in a collective enterprise. Knowledge exchange systems (social media or otherwise) are tools for making those social meanings explicit.

So let’s be clear: learning has not suddenly become social because of social media. Rather, our views and the language we use to talk about knowledge – and consequently learning – are changing. Social media has broadened the conversation, made it public, and helped create different understandings of what social learning means to people in different shared enterprises.

Her blog post presents a misleading contest between the two as communities of practice is probably the most well-known concept in social learning theory. The core principle behind communities of practice is that learning is a social journey. A practice in a community of practice – especially a practice of any depth – requires a sustained history of social learning.

Tiffany highlights the problem when she says

When it comes to the terms “Social Learning” and “Communities of Practice”, many people in the corporate learning realm are confused, myself included.

“Social Learning” – along with “Personal Learning Networks” – are being cranked up in HR. Social learning is being used as though it referred to social media by people like Jane Hart of C4LPT.

Jane’s social learning handbook sees social learning as a social media revolution where

… everyone can have access to the Social Web and a range of services and applications to support their own as well as their team’s learning, performance and productivity.

Tiffany Fary, in the same blogpost, sees social learning as

What do *I* need to know and who knows how to answer this quickly? Knowledge is primarily consumed or pulled from experts.

Her description is slightly broader than Jane’s as social learning is

leaning in the wild, via conversation, social media and the learning 2.0 technologies.

Whoa!

Social learning – and communities of practice – have been around a lot longer than social media. They have probably been around even longer than conversations – homo erectus junior was only grunting while he watched homo erectus seniors make and throw spears for hunting.

It’s just that social learning (and communities of practice) have become helpful ways of understanding how we know and learn at a time in history when solving complex problems problems needs more and diverse perspectives. Convening those different perspectives in pursuit of getting better at doing things is proving more helpful than the belief that we we merely transfer knowledge for people to apply.

Social media offers all sorts of new ways to convene – and make heard – different perspectives and voices. At the same time many more people are using social media to get just-in-time info, instant answers, feedback or perspectives. Social media is making it even more important that we get better at understanding the processes behind social learning.

So in response to Tiffany’s invitation to understand the difference between some of the terms we are using, I make this offering:

• Social learning is a view on how we learn i.e socially in interaction with each other.
• Social networks, personal networks and communities of practice are different ways that social learning manifests itself.
• Social networks (a bunch of PLNs) refer to connections and relationships between people that are used as a resource for solving problems, sharing knowledge and making more connections (1)
• Communities of practice are a learning partnership between people who use each others practice as a learning resource (1)

(“Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework” by Etienne Wenger, Beverly Trayner, Maarten de Laat, forthcoming paper for the Open University of the Netherlands)

Bev Trayner – about from Bev Trayner on Vimeo.

Having set myself the task of Finding an ID by Monday, I have finally made a brief video describing who I am and what I do.

What did I learn about making this video?

PREPARATION

• Headspace. It needed a window of sequential time – and focus – to make it all happen.
• Deciding what to say. Thinking of what I wanted to say turned out harder than I thought. For a few days I walked round with a Flip camera, stopping myself at unlikely moments to ask myself what I am passionate about and what I do. I didn’t use any of these recordings for the video – I analyzed them to try and notice the essence of what I am trying to say.
• Write and rewrite. Writing (and rewriting, and rewriting) the script – or crucial ideas – was really important.

DOING IT

• Time. One minute of video took 3 days of work and around 200 takes (including partial ones).
• Find a camera person. Having tried every kind of tripod – including a candle on a book on a chair on a stool – I conceded that I needed someone else to do the camera work.
• Think light. Natural light was SO much better than artificial light – even if you can adjust it in iMovie.
• Tap into friends. I got great input from the three people I asked to help with making the video. It would have been very different without them (Thanks Jess, Lucy and Etienne!)
• No reading. Don’t read the script. Despite all sorts of jiggery pokery to try and hide the fact I was reading, nothing worked. My first “final” video came out with me making some very weird eye movements, which I tried to pretend weren’t there.

RE-DOING IT

• Finish the video, then do it again. Only having finished “the final version”, which I was happy with, did I then decide to make a “final final version”. It took looking at it through the eyes of a viewer to see that it wasn’t good enough for the real final version.
• Chunk it. In the first version I tried discretely to read a script. The second version worked much better by chunking the video and doing it in different locations where I just had to memorize a small piece of text. Memorizing chunks of text made it easier to put my heart into the words and to improvise.

EDITING AND PUBLISHING

• iMovie. iMovie is great for simple videos like this – although I couldn’t work out how to stretch the transitions without cutting some of the video. Does anyone know?
• Size matters. I saved it as a Small movie as it’s unlikely people will watch it in big and it makes it easier for people with lower bandwidth.
• Embed in WordPress.org I also learned a trick for embedding videos in WordPress.org without a plugin. Copy/paste the video embed code into the HTML editor of your post and save. DON’T switch back to the Visual editor because it strips out the code you want.

And here are some of the discarded clips I didn’t use!

Deleted scenes from Bev’s video from Bev Trayner on Vimeo.

imeo.

Does anyone else want to make a one minute ID video and share tips?

There was a time when my desktop feed reader was one of the most lively places on my desktop, but it’s now a place I visit every now and then.

Until today I’ve stuck to NetNewsWire for reading feeds (no, I don’t like Google Reader – it’s browser based and useless if you travel). But NetNewsWire has become messy and a pain to read. NewsRack has taken over – I love the elegant, double pane, tabbed interface that makes it a joy to read.

Whether it’s Feeds, Facebook or Twitter my reading habits have gone from keeping an eye out on everything – to following people I care about, good writers on things that interest me, and sound bytes that keep me updated on social media tools and fun things like that.

For reading newspapers I have a browser folder on my toolbar which opens each papers in a new tab (same window). I browse through the papers clicking on articles in new tabs to read later. Firefox is great for this as you can put the newspaper on full screen mode, which looks great on my 17″.

Last year keeping up with wikis or workspaces went from my feed reader to email. But that’s now heading back to my feed reader ‘coz I’m fed up of waking up to a hundred mini wiki page updates in my inbox.

Discussion group messages go direct to a folder in my desktop email where I catch up around once a week.

Once a hard copy book addict I’m lucky if I read two books a year.  I’m reading one now – a slim book on Ethnography Lessons by Harry Woolcott. I’m on page 136 after two months. It’s fairly light reading and I love the author and the content. I’m also a speed reader. Ten years ago I would have wolfed the book down in an hour or so.  Now I suffer from concentration-competition.

And no, I don’t read on my iPhone – not unless I can find my strong glasses and am somewhere with free wifi. And I haven’t got a Kindle nor a iPad.

I’m preparing a 1 minute video for my revamped website about who I am and what I do.

Yikes. Who am I? And what do I do?

I have a history of worrying about my identity and Nancy White (in Facebook comments) suggests that my identity crisis is part of my identity.

EW insists I have a very solid sense of self. My problem is having a simple narrative for who I am. I’m complex and it gets in the way of an easy-to-tell story.

(To which I flick my hair to one side, cross my legs and puff on an imaginary long cigarette – pondering pretentiously on my complexity.)

Anyway, complexity aside – he’s right. I don’t have an easy story about who I am.

Deadline Monday: who am I and what do I do?

My strategy for finding out is to cruise round with a Flip videocam, surprising myself in unlikely places with the question: who are you Beverly and what do you do? With acute anxiety I force myself to watch each video looking for clues.

I’ve learned some things in this exercise:

I realize that “Who am I?” is a threefold question. One is a an existential question to myself. A second is having a convincing account of who I am that I can give to other people. And the third is feeling like an authentic interface between the existential and the convincing account.

So who am I under all those layers of socialization, social and cultural expectations? And who am I with them.  Here I have to delve into my viscera to try and listen to myself. And I pay attention to the kinds of things I’ve done. I’m noticing that I’m more likely to hear the answer when I’m physically fit or tuned into some music and African rhythms.

The other part of that question is – what is the story I tell about myself? I don’t have any decent short stories to tell about myself, like “I’m British and live in Portugal” or “I have two grown-up children” or “I’m a <Job Title>”. While those stories could be convincing to the outside they are not sufficiently convincing to me.

So there you go. Who am I? Who am I? And what do I do? I’ve given myself until Monday to come up with one that both I can buy into and that is convincing for the world.

13 Feb ’11 – Changes update: I worried about this post after I published it. I missed something important. Now a few days later I’ve changed it.