<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Plataformatec Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.plataformatec.com.br</link>
	<description>Plataformatec's place to talk about Ruby, Ruby on Rails and software engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PlataformaBlogComments" /><feedburner:info uri="plataformablogcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on SimpleForm 2.0 + Bootstrap: for you with love by mvilrokx</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~3/BxI0Tm7U070/</link>
		<dc:creator>mvilrokx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/?p=2469#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>Love it, using it on 
http://bpgraph.com/, thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it, using it on <br />
<a href="http://bpgraph.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bpgraph.com/</a>, thx!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~4/BxI0Tm7U070" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/2012/02/simpleform-2-0-bootstrap-for-you-with-love/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barebone models to use with ActionPack in Rails 4.0 by Carlos Antonio</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~3/zTV9hjBU2Bk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/?p=2543#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>Hello Chris :)

Yeah, I do know ActiveAttr - it's a great gem btw, congrats - and that it's created to be modular. That's ActiveModel's goal as well, to provide pieces that you can use to build up your classes/models. I just think that ActiveModel gives you the API to be flexible enough to create the functionality you need, and usually not some functionality out of the box. ActiveAttr takes it a step further and implement its modules on top of ActiveModel, giving you a final implementation for common cases, which is great =). 
Thanks for your feedback.

--
At.
Carlos Antonio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Chris <img src='http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yeah, I do know ActiveAttr &#8211; it&#8217;s a great gem btw, congrats &#8211; and that it&#8217;s created to be modular. That&#8217;s ActiveModel&#8217;s goal as well, to provide pieces that you can use to build up your classes/models. I just think that ActiveModel gives you the API to be flexible enough to create the functionality you need, and usually not some functionality out of the box. ActiveAttr takes it a step further and implement its modules on top of ActiveModel, giving you a final implementation for common cases, which is great =).<br />
Thanks for your feedback.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
At.<br />
Carlos Antonio</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~4/zTV9hjBU2Bk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/2012/03/barebone-models-to-use-with-actionpack-in-rails-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1207</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barebone models to use with ActionPack in Rails 4.0 by Chris Griego</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~3/fTrZF4R5vaY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Griego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/?p=2543#comment-1206</guid>
		<description> Carlos, you may want to take a closer look at ActiveAttr. While it does offer the all-in-one Model module, it's made up of slices of functionality that I think captures the spirit of the ActiveModel library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Carlos, you may want to take a closer look at ActiveAttr. While it does offer the all-in-one Model module, it&#8217;s made up of slices of functionality that I think captures the spirit of the ActiveModel library.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~4/fTrZF4R5vaY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/2012/03/barebone-models-to-use-with-actionpack-in-rails-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barebone models to use with ActionPack in Rails 4.0 by Carlos Antonio</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~3/wfhwsJEx1f4/</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/?p=2543#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Hey Joris, sorry but what do you mean about "defining a form"? Would you mind trying to exemplify your idea? 

The change we are showing in this post helps you create a model with some plug and play functionality, the api you need to use with Rails helpers - ie form_for and url helpers.. but that doesn't mean it's only tied to a form.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joris, sorry but what do you mean about &#8220;defining a form&#8221;? Would you mind trying to exemplify your idea? </p>
<p>The change we are showing in this post helps you create a model with some plug and play functionality, the api you need to use with Rails helpers &#8211; ie form_for and url helpers.. but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s only tied to a form.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~4/wfhwsJEx1f4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/2012/03/barebone-models-to-use-with-actionpack-in-rails-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1205</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barebone models to use with ActionPack in Rails 4.0 by Joris Verschoor</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~3/Q_vrpgPnrH8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Joris Verschoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/?p=2543#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>Can you use this inline? i.e.: use this to define a "Form", instead of a model?

imo rails confuses "Form" with "Model"...  Ofcourse it should be easy to create a form from a model, but this is where the annoyance started</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you use this inline? i.e.: use this to define a &#8220;Form&#8221;, instead of a model?</p>
<p>imo rails confuses &#8220;Form&#8221; with &#8220;Model&#8221;&#8230;  Ofcourse it should be easy to create a form from a model, but this is where the annoyance started</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~4/Q_vrpgPnrH8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/2012/03/barebone-models-to-use-with-actionpack-in-rails-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1204</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barebone models to use with ActionPack in Rails 4.0 by Carlos Antonio</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~3/Jdwu_Temtso/</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/?p=2543#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>I believe ActiveModel::Model is a great start, it makes it a lot easier to get a barebone model with the most common required interface up and running quickly. Other than that, Rails already provides everything else required to create AR-like classes, you just need to cherry-pick what you need, when you need. ActiveAttr is great in the sense of collecting all available modules in ActiveModel as a convenience, but I'm not sure it'd be a great fit for Rails to have an all-in-one module like it.

Thanks for your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe ActiveModel::Model is a great start, it makes it a lot easier to get a barebone model with the most common required interface up and running quickly. Other than that, Rails already provides everything else required to create AR-like classes, you just need to cherry-pick what you need, when you need. ActiveAttr is great in the sense of collecting all available modules in ActiveModel as a convenience, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;d be a great fit for Rails to have an all-in-one module like it.</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlataformaBlogComments/~4/Jdwu_Temtso" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/2012/03/barebone-models-to-use-with-actionpack-in-rails-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: blog.plataformatec.com.br @ 2012-03-09 21:20:44 -->

