<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Project Management Resources, Templates, Books, Tools, News :: PMToolbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmtoolbox.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmtoolbox.com</link>
	<description>Project Management Resources, Templates, Books, Tools, News :: PMToolbox</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CSC;  CSC Joins Project Management Institute Global Corporate Council</title>
		<link>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:988815211&isRss=true</link>
		<comments>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:988815211&isRss=true#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[PMPort]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portfolio management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[program management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">l:988815211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CSC (NYSE:CSC) announced that it has joined the Project Management Institute (PMI) Global Corporate Council. PMI is the world's leading not-for-profit association for the project management profession (see also CSC).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:988815211&isRss=true/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irish firm wins E250m Asian contracts;  PM Contracts</title>
		<link>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622620&isRss=true</link>
		<comments>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622620&isRss=true#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[PMPort]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portfolio management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[program management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">l:992622620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irish international project management, engineering and architecture firm, PM Group, has won three major contracts with a gross capital value of around E250m in Singapore, China and India.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622620&isRss=true/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Projects 2009-06-19 13:17:00</title>
		<link>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/jeff-edwards-carried-out-survey-of.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/jeff-edwards-carried-out-survey-of.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Better Projects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15466608.post-6798429021214653739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="text-align: center"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_aeLoUSM0Rpo/SjcTxIfMlaI/AAAAAAAAAJQ/ZpFAuV-zX8M/S730/SlidingHomeMastHead4.jpg"><img border="0" height="100" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_aeLoUSM0Rpo/SjcTxIfMlaI/AAAAAAAAAJQ/ZpFAuV-zX8M/S730/SlidingHomeMastHead4.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>Jeff Edwards carried out a survey of project managers, exploring some of the presumptions about project management practices. He has written up a series of blog posts on 9 PM areas and found only two of them had a really solid contribution to project success.<br /><br />A caution on the study - it was of a limited size.&#160; It is worth taking a look at.&#160; Start the series <a href="http://managementhouse.blogspot.com/2009/01/first-impressions-of-management-in-real.html">here</a>, and <a href="http://managementhouse.blogspot.com/2009/06/sacred-pm-practices-findings-revealed.html">finish here</a>, with a short podcast.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/jeff-edwards-carried-out-survey-of.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Projects 2009-06-19 12:21:00</title>
		<link>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/seilevel-have-published-requireents.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/seilevel-have-published-requireents.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Better Projects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15466608.post-5940232826264685946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="text-align: left"><a href="http://requirements.seilevel.com/blog/uploaded_images/ROM-747452.bmp"><img border="0" height="123" src="http://requirements.seilevel.com/blog/uploaded_images/ROM-747452.bmp" width="200" /></a>Seilevel have published a Requireents Object Model (ROM).&#160; This is similar to a Requirements Entity Relationship (RER) model Guy Beauchamp put together in 2007.&#160;</div><div class="separator" style="text-align: left">Compare the two and offer your thoughts.</div><ul><li><a href="http://requirements.seilevel.com/blog/2009/06/live-from-refsq-requirements-object.html">Seilevel's ROM</a></li><li><a href="http://www.betterprojects.net/2007/11/fundamentals-of-business-analysis.html">Guy Beachamp's RER</a><br /></li></ul>Either model is an interesting choice. What do they give you?<br /><br />One thing is a pathway to ensure you have good coverage of the requirements, another is to ensure you have good alignment to the sponsor/business goals.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/seilevel-have-published-requireents.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING;  Researchers at University of Montreal target computer assisted learning</title>
		<link>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622622&isRss=true</link>
		<comments>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622622&isRss=true#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[PMPort]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portfolio management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[program management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">l:992622622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to recent research from Montreal, Canada, "Teamwork and technology, even as people are seeing their increased use in organizations, are becoming important components of problem-based learning in academic settings. Yet, fostering computer-assisted teamwork is complex and time consuming."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622622&isRss=true/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STANFORD NEWS SERVICE;  Stanford and Salesforce.com Present  Project Management 2.0  in Action</title>
		<link>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622625&isRss=true</link>
		<comments>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622625&isRss=true#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[PMPort]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portfolio management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[program management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">l:992622625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Project management has no   one size fits all   approach, but the agile rollout at salesforce.com holds lessons for many companies looking to change their production processes to meet today  s challenges. Stanford University  s Advanced Project Management Program now presents the company  s compelling success story as a real-world example of core principles taught in the certificate  s overview course, Converting Strategy Into Action. In today  s complex, fast-paced business environments, traditional   project management as usual   practices don  t work; companies need to combine proven approaches with emerging concepts to align their project initiatives with strategic goals.  Chris Fry, salesforce.com vice president of Platform Development and Steve Greene, senior director of Tools and Agile Development, present the company  s successful switch from a waterfall system to an agile-based system    from the traditional, sequential system to an emergent, iterative and empirical system. The conversion is one of industry  s largest and fastest agile transformations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=3045&topicId=100050541&docId=l:992622625&isRss=true/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Not to Work</title>
		<link>http://www.gantthead.com/article.cfm?ID=249849</link>
		<comments>http://www.gantthead.com/article.cfm?ID=249849#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gantthead.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Application Development Methodology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business Case]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence Tools]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cost Benefit Analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Crm Applications]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deliverable Templates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ganthead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gantthead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Information Engineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology Planning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Issue Tracking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[It White Papers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Management Processes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Methodologies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsft Project]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MS Project]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Package Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PMO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portfolio management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Program Management Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project and Program Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management Programs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Scope Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Systems Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[templates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.gantthead.com://1ef1150a9c462dfa563b857ea0ad29a6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is trying to find a job getting you down? Knowing what you <i>don't</i> want can go a long way in your search.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gantthead.com/article.cfm?ID=249849/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Studies</title>
		<link>http://www.gantthead.com/article.cfm?ID=249850</link>
		<comments>http://www.gantthead.com/article.cfm?ID=249850#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gantthead.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Application Development Methodology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business Case]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence Tools]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cost Benefit Analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Crm Applications]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deliverable Templates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ganthead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gantthead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Information Engineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology Planning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Issue Tracking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[It White Papers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Management Processes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Methodologies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsft Project]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MS Project]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Package Selection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PMO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portfolio management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Program Management Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project and Program Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management Programs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Scope Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Systems Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[templates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:www.gantthead.com://fa15c32a34dd9ddee49340dc88aff1c4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even with the widespread acceptance of social networking, many job hunters aren't fully exploiting all its advantages. Find out why social networking sites are ideal vehicles for promoting your career.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gantthead.com/article.cfm?ID=249850/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email, Whiteboards and Well-Caffeinated Wits</title>
		<link>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/email-whiteboards-and-well-caffeinated.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/email-whiteboards-and-well-caffeinated.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Better Projects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15466608.post-8824737065898326913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<i>This is a guest post by Jeff Hobbs.&#160; Jeff is a project manager at <a href="http://workspace.activestate.com/">ActiveState Software</a> who provide pm and collaboration software.</i><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="text-align: center"><a href="http://tcl.tk/starkits/jeffh.jpg"><img border="0" height="150" src="http://tcl.tk/starkits/jeffh.jpg" width="200" /></a></div><span style="font-size: large">Email, Whiteboards and Well-Caffeinated Wits</span><br /><br />The culture of software development has many myths, but among its truths are that we’re a busy lot. Moving from project to project often has to happen so quickly that there’s little chance to take stock of what works and what doesn’t in the processes we follow and the tools we use.<br /><br />That scenario probably feels familiar, but who hasn’t been eager to get started on the next great idea or the newest client with an almost impossible deadline that we’d love to meet? The love of making things and the pressure to keep moving can lead to some risky process decisions, especially surrounding the choice of project management tools. When ActiveState commissioned a survey to find out how developers are managing their projects, the extent of that risk and how far-reaching it is in the industry took us by surprise.<br /><br />Our survey took in responses from a full range of software professionals, from one-person-shows to both small and large teams working across industries. Most respondents work directly in the IT industry, rather than in IT supporting another industry, and some 66% work in teams of under 10 people.<br /><br />The first surprise was that only some 14% of respondents are using a dedicated project management solution. Surprising but not a bombshell by any stretch, because we know that specialized tools that can be used in tandem if there’s a process that stitches those tools together. Only some 20% of respondents are using those specialized tools to assemble their own ad-hoc project management system. <br /><br />That leaves some 80% using little more than email, whiteboards and well-caffeinated wits to keep track of all the things that need tracking in a technology project. That number really surprises us, partly because we all know there are established names in project management solutions. But let’s face it: where mindshare isn’t translating into market share, something isn’t working. <br /><br />The climb from barely organized to really getting things done as a team can look daunting from the bottom. But some small first steps and tips for thinking about the process of selecting methods and tools can make it easy to get under way. <br /><br /><b>Set Your Sights</b><br />Make a simple statement of the project goal, then print it out at a size that you can read from across the room and post it wherever work is happening, online or in a physical space. Having that common goal present in the team’s working context is a visible reminder of what’s most important, and a great touchstone for testing new ideas and decisions along the way. <br /><br /><b>The Real Team Energizer</b><br />Forget Red Bull, and throw out the Jolt. The thing that will really energize your team is making information critical to the project easily available to everyone in the project. With feature lists, discussions, schedule milestones and key decisions taken along the way, you’ll find the need to remind and re-hash established knowledge going way down. One thing that can be hard about opening up the flow of information in a project is stopping the email habit. Email is easy, but it can be a project killer by locking up crucial data in the recipient list. With a commonly-accessible store of project information, the walls between team members that we may not even see come down.<br /><br /><b>Don’t Rush into Commitment</b><br />Choose the tools that demand the least up-front effort to start using. Diving into a project management solution that requires hours of setup can give you a feeling of getting things under control, until you find that it just doesn’t work the way your team works. Choosing a tool that lets you start with a low commitment of time and effort, and that can grow as you find it more useful, will avoid wasting time on dead-ends that might be good for other teams, but not yours.<br /><br /><b>Ask Around</b><br />Talk to other software teams and find out how they keep themselves on track. If you’re already in a community that you like talking with, bring to them the question of how to evolve the way a team works. Pitch an ad-hoc discussion over drinks with some local developers working in teams of a size and nature similar to yours. Even if you don’t get the exact answers you need, it can feel good knowing you’re not alone in facing project management challenges. And you might make some new friends in the process, as a bonus.<br /><br />Whatever course you choose, if you’re not using a project management process that’s working for your team today, the one thing that I can guarantee is that it won’t get better without making a change. And like crossing any distance, taking that first step gets you that much closer to project sanity than you were before.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/email-whiteboards-and-well-caffeinated.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If communication is so important&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/if-communication-is-so-important.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/if-communication-is-so-important.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Better Projects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Project Management News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15466608.post-2032826555357188758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="text-align: center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2259/2384680412_6daffbe00f.jpg?v=0"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2259/2384680412_6daffbe00f.jpg?v=0" width="133" /></a></div>If communication is so important, what are the standard ways we measure it?<br /><br />I am reading and marking essays.&#160; One of the great things about this process is reading perspectives on project management from informed outsiders.&#160; It's really interesting hearing other people's take on my job.<br /><br />Take this comment from an essay; <i><b>"Project managers always say how important communication is.&#160; But how is communication measured?"</b></i><br /><br />Yes, you have a plan, and yes you track whether things are done on time and to budget.&#160;<br /><br />But how do you measure the effectiveness of your project communciations?&#160; And how do you make sure the activities remain aligned to the project goals?<br /><div style="text-align: right"><span style="font-size: xx-small"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: right"><span style="font-size: xx-small">Photo by&#160; <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks/" rel="dc:creator cc:attributionURL" title="Link to woodleywonderworks' photostream">woodleywonderworks</a> CC @ <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks/2384680412/">Flickr</a>.</span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1'></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betterprojects.net/2009/06/if-communication-is-so-important.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
