<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Taegan Goddard's Political Wire</title>
        <link>http://politicalwire.com/</link>
        <description>Taegan Goddard's Political Wire -- News, polls and buzz</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <feedburner:info uri="politicalwire" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://politicalwire.com/headlines.xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>PoliticalWire</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed or RSS feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
            <title>Bonus Quote of the Day</title>
            <description>"I was a severely conservative Republican governor."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- Mitt Romney, quoted by the &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romney-was-severely-conservative-governor-he-tells-cpac/2012/02/10/gIQABoNT4Q_story.html"&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;, attempting to convince a convention of right-wing activists that he's one of them.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/5F1SEcXY3eQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/5F1SEcXY3eQ/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mitt Romney</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:40 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Deadlocked Conventions That Never Happened</title>
            <description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/the_deadlock_scenario/singleton/"&gt;Steve Kornacki&lt;/a&gt; pulls together a nice history of all the &lt;a href="http://politicaldictionary.com/words/brokered-convention/"&gt;brokered conventions&lt;/a&gt; that were predicted but never materialized. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

"The last time there was true post-primary season suspense on the GOP side was in 1976, when Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan both emerged from the last wave of contests in early June short of the magic delegate number... That was the last truly unpredictable convention that either party has staged. But at various moments in primary campaigns since then, we've heard the kind of deadlocked convention chatter we're now hearing."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/AG1Onlo9mp0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/AG1Onlo9mp0/deadlocked_conventions_that_never_happened.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/deadlocked_conventions_that_never_happened.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Political History</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:29:54 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/deadlocked_conventions_that_never_happened.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Are Romney's Negative Ads Backfiring?</title>
            <description>Mitt Romney's reliance on negative messaging to defeat his rivals has been brutally effective so far, but &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-02-09/mitt-romney-negative-ads-super-pac/53032978/1"&gt;Martha Moore&lt;/a&gt; makes the case that voters might eventually start to turn on Romney.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Now,
 however, it's not just Romney's rivals who are saying Romney is all 
negative, all the time. As he trains his sights on Santorum, he faces 
increasing complaints that his focus on rubbishing his opponents, 
successfully, is coming at the expense of a compelling message and his 
own appeal to voters...&amp;nbsp;Negative ads work -- but at a cost... Voters can 
end up loathing the attacker as much or more as the person being 
attacked."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/yYdaCgbddTg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/yYdaCgbddTg/are_romneys_negative_ads_backfiring.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/are_romneys_negative_ads_backfiring.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mitt Romney</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/are_romneys_negative_ads_backfiring.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Beware of the Delegate Counts</title>
            <description>&lt;a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolitics/2012/02/snowflakes_and_fingerprints_no.php"&gt;Smart Politics&lt;/a&gt; examined the Republican delegate scorecards of eight prominent news outlets and found no two counts were identical.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/0uprkIWC14o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/0uprkIWC14o/beware_of_the_delegate_counts.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/beware_of_the_delegate_counts.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/beware_of_the_delegate_counts.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Santorum Leads in Tennessee</title>
            <description>A new &lt;a href="http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres2012/primary/rep/tn/"&gt;American Research Group poll&lt;/a&gt; in Tennessee finds Rick Santorum leading the Republican presidential field with 34%, followed by Mitt Romney at 27%, Newt Gingrich at 16%, and Ron Paul at 13%.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

The Tennessee primary is on March 6.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/9jXxfG9mO78" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/9jXxfG9mO78/santorum_leads_in_tennessee.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/santorum_leads_in_tennessee.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:37 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/santorum_leads_in_tennessee.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Looks Like There's a New GOP Frontrunner</title>
            <description>Early indications from two polls in the field -- &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#%21/ppppolls/status/167775351718686720"&gt;Public Policy Polling&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#%21/fivethirtyeight/status/167815058552922112"&gt;Gallup&lt;/a&gt; -- show Rick Santorum either taking over the lead among Republican voters nationally or at least tied with Mitt Romney.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A new &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/10/fox-news-poll-santorum-surges-nationally-after-three-state-sweep/"&gt;Fox News poll&lt;/a&gt; also shows Santorum surging and in the last two days the poll was in the field he moved into a dead heat with Romney, 30% to 30%.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/Qhha1iIuJew" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/Qhha1iIuJew/looks_like_theres_a_new_gop_frontrunner.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/looks_like_theres_a_new_gop_frontrunner.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rick Santorum</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:35:55 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/looks_like_theres_a_new_gop_frontrunner.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Maine Caucuses Get Extra Attention</title>
            <description>On Saturday at around 7:30 pm ET, we'll get the results from Maine's caucuses which have taken place over the last week. It's essentially a battle between Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, as Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum have made no efforts in the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/20120209gops_caucuses_in_maine_getting_extra_attention/"&gt;Boston Herald&lt;/a&gt;: "Romney still leads the race, but he faces a strong challenge from Paul 
in Maine, analysts say, and his losses Tuesday in Colorado, Minnesota 
and Missouri will raise the profile of Maine's nonbinding presidential 
preference poll."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/02/thoughts-on-maine.html"&gt;Tom Jensen&lt;/a&gt;: "It's generally assumed Mitt Romney will win tomorrow, largely because 
it's another New England state, but I'm a little skeptical."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/t6gQBVwfIQM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/t6gQBVwfIQM/maine_caucuses_get_extra_attention.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/maine_caucuses_get_extra_attention.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:38:04 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/maine_caucuses_get_extra_attention.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Romney Advisers Worried About Shaky Performance</title>
            <description>The &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romneys-presidential-campaign-stuck-in-lukewarm/2012/02/09/gIQAhEMh2Q_story.html"&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; reports Mitt Romney's advisers are getting nervous after yet another bad week for their candidate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

"One prominent adviser told the candidate to sharpen his use of conservative code words and create 'small pictures' -- vivid imagery, in other words -- to connect with voters. Another flew to Boston to say that Romney's message is too businesslike and broad to capture the passion of angry Republican voters. Still others have gone on television and written opinion columns to hammer home what is becoming a common theme this year: that Romney has not been able to ignite a cause when the GOP is primed to become part of one."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/10/10372155-first-thoughts-what-a-difference-four-years-can-make"&gt;First Read&lt;/a&gt;: "So we've gone from advisers taking credit (in the &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/us/politics/the-calculations-that-led-romney-to-the-warpath.html?_r=1&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;) for his turnaround in Florida, to now criticizing him (in the &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romneys-presidential-campaign-stuck-in-lukewarm/2012/02/09/gIQAhEMh2Q_story.html"&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;) after his defeats on Tuesday. Folks, that isn't characteristic of a winning presidential campaign..."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/rq5huHj-2Dk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/rq5huHj-2Dk/romney_advisers_worried_about_shaky_performance.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/romney_advisers_worried_about_shaky_performance.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:35:37 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/romney_advisers_worried_about_shaky_performance.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Why the White House Picked a Contraception Fight</title>
            <description>While the White House has taken quite a bit of heat over its decision to mandate that health insurance cover contraception, &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/the-white-houses-convenient-contraception-controversy/2012/02/09/gIQAeOfm2Q_blog.html?wprss=the-fix"&gt;The Fix&lt;/a&gt; notes that this may be a politically useful fight the Obama administration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"For
 a White House that has often been accused of trying to undermine&amp;nbsp;Mitt 
Romney&amp;nbsp;in the Republican presidential race, the contraception debate is 
perhaps its happiest accident in that quest.&amp;nbsp;After all, while the issue 
hasn't exactly been&amp;nbsp;fun to deal with&amp;nbsp;for the White House, what better 
way to help a social conservative like&amp;nbsp;Rick Santorum&amp;nbsp;in his quest to 
bring down Romney?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, &lt;a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/209905-report-white-house-to-announce-accommodation-on-contraception-rule"&gt;The Hill&lt;/a&gt; reports that the White House will announce a compromise in response to pressure from Catholic groups and Democrats.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/XNkfOjHVhhE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/XNkfOjHVhhE/why_the_white_house_picked_a_contraception_fight.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/why_the_white_house_picked_a_contraception_fight.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">White House</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:31:17 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/why_the_white_house_picked_a_contraception_fight.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Quote of the Day</title>
            <description>"Santorum doesn't even need to run negatives against Romney, which is telling."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- GOP strategist Alex Castellanos, quoted by &lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/209891-romney-and-santorum-face-off-for-conservative-voters"&gt;The Hill&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/sY8HiQoK5BI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/sY8HiQoK5BI/quote_of_the_day.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/quote_of_the_day.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rick Santorum</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:51:49 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/quote_of_the_day.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Big Money to Gingrich Stops</title>
            <description>Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and his family don't plan to deliver another big check to a Super PAC backing Newt Gingrich's presidential campaign, &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-10/gingrich-seeks-to-ease-fundraising-woes-as-big-donations-slow.html"&gt;Bloomberg&lt;/a&gt; reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

The family has donated a combined $11 million to Gingrich's super-PAC in the past two months, according to interviews and Federal Election Commission records.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/As6VSomTS_0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/As6VSomTS_0/big_money_to_gingrich_stops.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/big_money_to_gingrich_stops.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Newt Gingrich</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:47:44 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/big_money_to_gingrich_stops.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The GOP's Death Star</title>
            <description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203824904577212832724317096.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_t"&gt;Peggy Noonan&lt;/a&gt;: "Nobody in the conservative base hates Rick. Newt is hated by many and Mitt by some. Mr. Santorum is liked. He has real indignation about what's happened to America, and he brings passion to his ideas about reform. He's got little money, little organization -- there's no broad assumption he can pull it off. And by the time the Romney campaign is done dismantling him, he may have some people who hate him. But this will only underscore the Romney campaign's reputation for destroying, not creating. And nobody loves a Death Star."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/CFPqNSL7S30" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/CFPqNSL7S30/the_gops_death_star.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/the_gops_death_star.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mitt Romney</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:21:12 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/the_gops_death_star.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Obama's Brush with Political Disaster</title>
            <description>The &lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/100595/obama-escape-artist-excerpt?page=0,1"&gt;New Republic&lt;/a&gt; runs an excerpt from Noam Scheiber's &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1439172404/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=youwonnowwhat&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1439172404"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Escape Artists&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; which gives an inside account of last year's debt ceiling/deficit struggle.
&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; 

"For voters contemplating whether he deserves a second term, the question is less and less one of policy or even worldview than of basic disposition. Throughout his political career, Obama has displayed an uncanny knack for responding to existential threats... But, in every case, the adjustments didn't come until the crisis was already at hand. His initial approach was too passive and too accommodating, and he stuck with it far too long."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/MUYU9V2AOb0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/MUYU9V2AOb0/obamas_brush_with_political_disaster.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/obamas_brush_with_political_disaster.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Political Books</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:14:54 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/obamas_brush_with_political_disaster.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bachus Investigated for Insider Trading</title>
            <description>The Office of Congressional Ethics is investigating Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL), over possible violations of insider-trading laws, the &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/rep-bachus-faces-insider-trading-investigation/2012/02/09/gIQA21Ui2Q_story.html"&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Bachus, who holds one of the most influential positions in the House chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, "has been a frequent trader on Capitol Hill, buying stock options while overseeing the nation's banking and financial services industries."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

"The case is the first of its kind involving a member of Congress. It comes at a time of intense public scrutiny of congressional ethics, with the House passing legislation Thursday to tighten rules against insider trading by lawmakers. The impetus for the legislation, a version of which passed in the Senate a week earlier, came from a &lt;em&gt;60 Minutes&lt;/em&gt; report and a book &lt;a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/11/14/bachus_traded_while_attending_secret_meetings.html"&gt;mentioning&lt;/a&gt; Bachus's trades, &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0547573146/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=youwonnowwhat&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0547573146"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Throw Them All Out&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, by Peter Schweizer."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/RDAPzfFnVxU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/RDAPzfFnVxU/bachus_investigated_for_insider_trading.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/bachus_investigated_for_insider_trading.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Ethics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">House of Representatives</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:05:34 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/10/bachus_investigated_for_insider_trading.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Kennedy Way Ahead for Congress</title>
            <description>A new &lt;a href="http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/20120209poll_joe_kennedy_iii_has_huge_lead_in_us_rep_race/srvc=home&amp;amp;position=0"&gt;UMass Lowell/Herald poll&lt;/a&gt; shows Joseph Kennedy III (D) trounces Sean Bielat (R) in a general election trial heat by a 60% to 28% margin in a race for the seat being vacated by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

"While the 31-year-old Kennedy has a commanding lead now, the race is far from over. The former Middlesex prosecutor has never run for office and has yet to make a single campaign appearance. He's expected to formally announce soon."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/pLVMiTQHbw0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/pLVMiTQHbw0/kennedy_way_ahead_for_congress.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/kennedy_way_ahead_for_congress.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">MA-4</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:48:11 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/kennedy_way_ahead_for_congress.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Santorum Leads in Pennsylvania</title>
            <description>A new &lt;a href="http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/regional/s_780699.html"&gt;Tribune-Review/WPXI-TV poll&lt;/a&gt; in Pennsylvania finds Rick Santorum's support has more than doubled  in his home state from 14% six weeks ago to 30% putting him just ahead of Mitt Romney.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Santorum leads with 30%, followed by Romney at 29% and Newt Gingrich at 13%. The survey was taken before Santorum's big wins earlier this week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Pennsylvania primary isn't until April 24.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/TdfWtgzqsTE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/TdfWtgzqsTE/santorum_leads_in_pennsylvania.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/santorum_leads_in_pennsylvania.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:14:52 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/santorum_leads_in_pennsylvania.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Santorum Unloads on Romney</title>
            <description>Rick Santorum "launched a full-throated attack on front-runner Mitt Romney" saying he "has been about serially tearing down opponents without offering any kind of vision for what he wants to do for this country," &lt;a href="http://nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/energized-santorum-unloads-on-romney-s-gotcha-politics--20120209"&gt;National Journal&lt;/a&gt; reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

He added: "This is the gotcha politics of Mitt Romney. He's not interested in talking about the issues."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/5iCNyZt7cbY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/5iCNyZt7cbY/santorum_unloads_on_romney.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/santorum_unloads_on_romney.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rick Santorum</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:00:40 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/santorum_unloads_on_romney.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bonus Quote of the Day</title>
            <description>"I love the fact that Sheldon put in about $10 million with Gingrich and I put in a lot less with Rick. I like to say I'm an investor and Sheldon is a casino guy."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

-- Santorum Super PAC financier Foster Freiss, in an interview on &lt;a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html"&gt;Bloomberg TV&lt;/a&gt;, poking fun at Gingrich Super PAC backer Sheldon Adelson. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/lP5l0JlNUEg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/lP5l0JlNUEg/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign Finance</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:57:58 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Could Romney Be Denied the Nomination?</title>
            <description>&lt;a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/how-romney-could-fail-get-enough-delegates/365281"&gt;Philip Klein&lt;/a&gt; says that it's "conceivable to craft the following general scenario: Romney wins states in the west and northeast, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum combine to dominate the south, Midwest and Appalachia, and Ron Paul siphons off a chunk of delegates. If such a scenario plays out, it's possible to see how Romney could have problems getting over the top, even if analysts are broadly correct that his money and organization give him the edge."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

In fact, "if Romney were to win all of the delegates in all of the states that I identified above as solid or lean states, it would only get him to 1,008 delegates, according to the CNN &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2012/calculator/#?ng_wy=0&amp;amp;ng_wa=0&amp;amp;ng_va=0&amp;amp;ng_vt=0&amp;amp;ng_ut=0&amp;amp;ng_sc=23&amp;amp;ng_ri=0&amp;amp;ng_or=0&amp;amp;ng_ny=0&amp;amp;ng_mn=2&amp;amp;ng_nj=0&amp;amp;ng_nv=6&amp;amp;ng_mt=0&amp;amp;ng_mi=0&amp;amp;ng_ma=0&amp;amp;ng_md=0&amp;amp;ng_ia=2&amp;amp;ng_ii=0&amp;amp;ng_id=0&amp;amp;ng_hi=0&amp;amp;ng_dl=0&amp;amp;ng_ct=0&amp;amp;ng_co=2&amp;amp;ng_ca=0&amp;amp;ng_az=0&amp;amp;ng_ak=0&amp;amp;ng_nm=0&amp;amp;rp_wy=0&amp;amp;rp_wa=0&amp;amp;rp_va=0&amp;amp;rp_vt=0&amp;amp;rp_ut=0&amp;amp;rp_ri=0&amp;amp;rp_or=0&amp;amp;rp_ny=0&amp;amp;rp_mn=4&amp;amp;rp_nj=0&amp;amp;rp_nh=3&amp;amp;rp_nv=5&amp;amp;rp_mt=0&amp;amp;rp_mi=0&amp;amp;rp_ma=0&amp;amp;rp_md=0&amp;amp;rp_ia=7&amp;amp;rp_ii=0&amp;amp;rp_id=0&amp;amp;rp_hi=0&amp;amp;rp_dl=0&amp;amp;rp_ct=0&amp;amp;rp_co=1&amp;amp;rp_ca=0&amp;amp;rp_az=0&amp;amp;rp_ak=0&amp;amp;rp_nm=0&amp;amp;rs_wy=0&amp;amp;rs_wa=0&amp;amp;rs_va=0&amp;amp;rs_vt=0&amp;amp;rs_ut=0&amp;amp;rs_ri=0&amp;amp;rs_or=0&amp;amp;rs_ny=0&amp;amp;rs_mn=6&amp;amp;rs_nj=0&amp;amp;rs_nv=3&amp;amp;rs_mt=0&amp;amp;rs_mi=0&amp;amp;rs_ma=0&amp;amp;rs_md=0&amp;amp;rs_ia=8&amp;amp;rs_ii=0&amp;amp;rs_id=0&amp;amp;rs_hi=0&amp;amp;rs_dl=0&amp;amp;rs_ct=0&amp;amp;rs_co=5&amp;amp;rs_ca=0&amp;amp;rs_az=0&amp;amp;rs_ak=0&amp;amp;rs_nm=0&amp;amp;mr_wy=29&amp;amp;mr_wa=43&amp;amp;mr_va=49&amp;amp;mr_vt=17&amp;amp;mr_ut=40&amp;amp;mr_sc=2&amp;amp;mr_ri=19&amp;amp;mr_or=28&amp;amp;mr_ny=95&amp;amp;mr_mn=2&amp;amp;mr_nj=50&amp;amp;mr_nh=7&amp;amp;mr_nv=14&amp;amp;mr_mt=26&amp;amp;mr_mi=30&amp;amp;mr_ma=41&amp;amp;mr_md=37&amp;amp;mr_ia=7&amp;amp;mr_ii=46&amp;amp;mr_id=32&amp;amp;mr_hi=20&amp;amp;mr_dl=17&amp;amp;mr_ct=28&amp;amp;mr_co=4&amp;amp;mr_ca=172&amp;amp;mr_az=29&amp;amp;mr_ak=27&amp;amp;mr_fl=50&amp;amp;mr_nm=23&amp;amp;rp_me=0&amp;amp;mr_me=24&amp;amp;rs_me=0&amp;amp;ng_me=0&amp;amp;"&gt;calculator&lt;/a&gt; -- still short of the required 1,144."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/MSJabnlXGRA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/MSJabnlXGRA/could_romney_be_denied_the_nomination.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/could_romney_be_denied_the_nomination.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:21:53 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/could_romney_be_denied_the_nomination.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Shit Mitt Says</title>
            <description>A Democratic Super PAC releases a &lt;a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/shit_mitt_says.html"&gt;new video&lt;/a&gt;, causing &lt;a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/democrats-release-shit-mitt-says"&gt;BuzzFeed&lt;/a&gt; to ask, "Does this mean the meme is really dead?"
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/qbdRzL9K2ds" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/qbdRzL9K2ds/shit_mitt_says.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/shit_mitt_says.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mitt Romney</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:09:22 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/shit_mitt_says.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Stop Colbert</title>
            <description>House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi &lt;a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/stop_colbert.html"&gt;put out a video&lt;/a&gt; urging Americans to rise up against Stephen Colbert to pass a law to get unlimited, secret donations out of politics.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/07yIYCnnROs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/07yIYCnnROs/stop_colbert.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/stop_colbert.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign Finance</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:43:42 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/stop_colbert.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Giffords Aide Will Run in Special Election</title>
            <description>Ron Barber (D), who has served as the district director for former Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-AZ) and was shot twice in same shooting that wounded the congresswoman, will enter the race to finish out her term, &lt;a href="http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/the-skinny/Content?category=1063733"&gt;Tucson Weekly&lt;/a&gt; reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Barber "is thought to be offering himself up as a caretaker for the remainder of Giffords' term," but multiple sources say he will not run in the November election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, sources tell &lt;a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/09/10363349-former-giffords-aide-wounded-in-shooting-set-to-run-for-seat"&gt;First Read&lt;/a&gt; that Barber is not necessarily a caretaker, that he's considering running for a full term if he wins the special.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/QaLGnytidTU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/QaLGnytidTU/giffords_aide_will_run_in_special_election.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/giffords_aide_will_run_in_special_election.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">AZ-8</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:04:04 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/giffords_aide_will_run_in_special_election.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Quote of the Day</title>
            <description>"There is not exactly Romney-mania right now."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

-- Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), quoted by &lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72648.html"&gt;Politico&lt;/a&gt;, point out that Romney must shore up his weaknesses with the GOP base.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/JbM-3avLz2U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/JbM-3avLz2U/quote_of_the_day.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/quote_of_the_day.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mitt Romney</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:39:43 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/quote_of_the_day.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>House Retirements Slight Plus for Republicans</title>
            <description>&lt;a href="http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/happy-trails-the-muted-effect-of-house-retirements/"&gt;Kyle Kondik&lt;/a&gt;: "Ultimately, the retirements so far have hit Democrats a little bit harder than Republicans; Team Blue is weakened in a handful of districts where the exit of predominately conservative members boosts Republican chances. Republican retirements do also open a few opportunities for Democrats, though those opportunities aren't quite as obvious. So far, the overall effect of these House retirements could help Republicans net a few open seats next November. That could be decisive if there is a very close race for the House, but it's also not a huge, added advantage for the GOP. Nor are those potential gains anywhere near guaranteed."&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/GTNNyzIG7FU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/GTNNyzIG7FU/house_retirements_slight_plus_for_republicans.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/house_retirements_slight_plus_for_republicans.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">House of Representatives</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:08:36 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/house_retirements_slight_plus_for_republicans.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Three Week Lull</title>
            <description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/primary-calendar-a-three-week-lull-before-arizona-and-michigan/"&gt;ABC News&lt;/a&gt;: "The next big GOP primaries won't come until Feb. 28, when Arizona and
 Michigan take to the polls, leaving little to talk about in the way of 
GOP vote results, except drawn out caucuses in the small states of Maine
 and Wyoming."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Also on the calendar: Republicans will next debate in Arizona on Feb. 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/RmVjRAXUXaM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/RmVjRAXUXaM/three_week_lull.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/three_week_lull.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2012 Campaign</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:48:09 -0500</pubDate>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/09/three_week_lull.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

