<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Pop Philosophy!</title>
<link>http://opencourtbooks.com/categories/pcp.htm</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>℗ &amp; © 2007 Open Court Publishing Company</copyright>
<managingEditor>ereitz@caruspub.com (Eric Reitz)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>cpineo@caruspub.com (Cindy Pineo)</webMaster>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:subtitle>Your regular dose of philosophy from Open Court's Popular Culture and Philosophy series. Get philosophical about your favorite movies, t.v. shows, rock bands, and much more. Download chapters in MP3 format. Visit us at opencourtbooks.com. The latest episo</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:author>Open Court Podcasts</itunes:author>
<itunes:summary>Your regular dose of philosophy from Open Court's Popular Culture and Philosophy series. Get philosophical about your favorite movies, t.v. shows, rock bands, and much more. Download chapters in MP3 format. Visit us at opencourtbooks.com.<br /> <br />The latest episode offers the world premiere of bonus content to <em>Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy</em>. Get it here and nowhere else!</itunes:summary>
<description>Philosophy podcasts from Open Court's supercool Popular Culture and Philosophy book series.</description>
<itunes:owner>
<itunes:name>Eric Reitz</itunes:name>
<itunes:email>ereitz@caruspub.com</itunes:email>
</itunes:owner>
<itunes:image href="http://opencourtbooks.com/images/eye_logo_itunes2.png" />

<media:copyright>℗ &amp; © 2007 Open Court Publishing Company</media:copyright><media:thumbnail url="http://opencourtbooks.com/images/eye_logo_itunes2.png" /><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Society &amp; Culture/Philosophy</media:category><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"><itunes:category text="Philosophy" /></itunes:category><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
	<title>Monty Python and David Hume on Religion</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Monty Python and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This episode features John Huss's essay about how to prove or disprove the existence of God through the eyes of Monty Python and philosopher David Hume.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>23:10</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, religion, pop culture, Monty Python, David Hume</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/90354539/monty_and_hume.mp3" fileSize="5400000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/90354539/monty_and_hume.mp3" length="5400000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/monty_and_hume.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>The Moral Status of the Double-0 Agent</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>James Bond and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This episode features Matthew Tedesco's essay about Agent 007's Liscense to Kill and the moral problems it poses.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>22:54</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, ethics, James Bond, liscense to kill</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/90354540/james_bond.mp3" fileSize="5900000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/90354540/james_bond.mp3" length="5900000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/james_bond.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Tony Soprano as Ethical Manager</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>The Sopranos and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This episode features Ronald Green's essay on how to be an effective manager like the mob boss Tony Soprano.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>27:26</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, manager, Tony Soprano, ethics, Sopranos</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/93044055/tony.mp3" fileSize="7000000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/93044055/tony.mp3" length="7000000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/tony.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>The Far East of Star Wars</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Star Wars and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This episode features Walter (Ritoku) Robinson's essay on everything ch'i, ki, and zen in the Star Wars mythology.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>23:36</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Star Wars, zen, buddhist, chi, the force, Luke Skywalker, light saber</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/96912590/star_wars.mp3" fileSize="6100000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/96912590/star_wars.mp3" length="6100000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/star_wars.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>The Morality of Bootlegging Bob</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Bob Dylan and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This episode features James C. Klagge's essay on the distinction between pirating and bootlegging, the rights of artists and fans, and why it might be no big deal to rip off Columbia Records.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>28:46</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Bob Dylan, Dylan, bootlegging, bootleg, pirating, DRM, ethics, music</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/99777641/bob_dylan.mp3" fileSize="7300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/99777641/bob_dylan.mp3" length="7300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/bob_dylan.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Chef, Socrates, and the Sage of Love</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>South Park and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This episode features Randall E. Auxier's essay on what South Park character Chef and the followers of controversial philosopher Leo Strauss know about love and sex. You don't know what they know, and you need to know!</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>29:52</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Leo Strauss, South Park, sex, love, Socrates</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/101448925/south_park.mp3" fileSize="7087000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/101448925/south_park.mp3" length="7087000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/south_park.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Why Be Moral? Amorality and Psychopathy in Strangers on a Train</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Hitchcock and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This episode features Steven M. Sanders's essay asking the perennial ethical question, Why be moral at all? Can Steven give us a compelling argument to not become a serial killer, for instance? Well?!?</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>23:50</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, evil, Hitchcock, murder, psychopath, morality, Psycho</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/103149085/hitchcock.mp3" fileSize="6220000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/103149085/hitchcock.mp3" length="6220000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/hitchcock.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Themes in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy as Reflected in the Work of Monty Python</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Monty Python and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>This podcast features Gary L. Hardcastle giving his world-renowned, nationally acclaimed presentation of "Themes in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy as Reflected in the Work of Monty Python." Includes clips from "The Cheese Shop," "The Argument Clinic," and other Pythonesque episodes in the history of Western philosophy. </itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>39:24</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Monty Python, analytic, John Cleese, humor, Monty</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/106888371/analytic_python.mp3" fileSize="9800000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/106888371/analytic_python.mp3" length="9800000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/analytic_python.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Brownskirts: Fascism, Christianity, and the Eternal Demon</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>In this podcast, Neal King identifies and elaborates upon fascist aspects of the Buffyverse. Are Buffy and her Scooby gang, with their incessant persecution and slayage of demonkind, more like the SS than a group of heroes? And is it right for us to cheer them on?</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>31:48</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Buffy, Nazi, Joss Whedon, fascism</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/108618865/buffy.mp3" fileSize="7600000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/108618865/buffy.mp3" length="7600000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/buffy.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>There Are No Ties at First Base</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Baseball and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>In this podcast, revered University of Chicago philosophy professor Ted Cohen is pretty sure he has found a contradiction in the rules of baseball centering around the belief that a tie goes to the runner. Professor Cohen embarks upon an epic quest to right this egregious wrong by mailing the National League of Professional Baseball Clubs. The response he gets will change his life forever.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>31:08</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, baseball, Ted Cohen, contradictions</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/112235435/baseball.mp3" fileSize="8200000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/112235435/baseball.mp3" length="8200000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/baseball.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Rear Window: Looking at Things Ethically</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Hitchcock and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>In this podcast, Aeon Skoble looks at Hitchcock's famous thriller Rear Window and unearths a perplexing ethical scenario. Is protagonist Jeff in the wrong when he snoops on a neighbor, even though his snooping leads to the apprehension of a crazed murderer? Do the ends justify the means? Find out!</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>21:56</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Rear Window, Alfred Hitchcock</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/115990709/rear_window.mp3" fileSize="5700000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/115990709/rear_window.mp3" length="5700000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/rear_window.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Seven Lessons in Philosophy You Already Learned Playing Texas Hold Em</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Poker and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Life is poker. Poker is life. Or so philosophy professor Michael Ventimiglia would have you believe. But if you just think he's referring to the life of compulsive gambler, you'd be dead wrong! Imagine sitting on pocket Q's. The flop is harmless, no flush or straight possibilities after the turn. The river is a K. How hard do you press? When confronted with these experiences, Professor Ventimiglia argues that you ought to consult the wisdom of the ages. </itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>24:48</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, poker, Texas Hold Em, gambling, wisdom, Plato</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/117803811/holdem.mp3" fileSize="6300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/117803811/holdem.mp3" length="6300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/holdem.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>A Vegetarian's Beef with Atkins</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>The Atkins Diet and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Is meat-eating morally objectionable? If you say not, you might argue that human beings have a higher moral status than animals; that its intuitively obvious that humans have the right to eat meat; and that humans have eaten meat since time immemorial, so why stop now? Or, you might believe that meat is an essential part of human nutrition. Behold as David Detmer blows these arguments out of the water.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>37:34</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, atkins diet, vegetarianism, meat-eating, morality,ethics</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/122730447/atkins.mp3" fileSize="9500000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/122730447/atkins.mp3" length="9500000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/atkins.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Enjoying the So-Called Iced Cream: Mr. Burns, Satan, and Happiness</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>The Simpsons and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Here's cold, creamy treat for those of you waiting with baited breath for the upcoming Simpsons movie. When Mr. Burns croons <em>Excellent</em>, is he really happy, or just chasing the next hollow goal? Although we all may think that happiness is made up of loosing hounds on unsuspecting Girl Scouts, Daniel Barwick proves that authentic happiness consists of more than merely instrumental goods. This essay will make you rub your hands together in glee.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>23:00</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Simpsons, Simpsons movie, Mr. Burns, happiness, ice cream</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/133400991/simpsons.mp3" fileSize="5300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/133400991/simpsons.mp3" length="5300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/simpsons.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Who Was Wise? Decision Theory in "Lady with a Fan"</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>The Grateful Dead and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The well-loved Grateful Dead tune "Lady with a Fan" presents the listener with a scenario: A beautiful lady throws a fan into a lion's den, and challenges two suitors to retrieve the fan in order to gain her affections. The solider refuses; the sailor takes the challenge and wins the lady's heart. Which made the right decision? Can Stephen Dillingham use Bayesian decision theory to tell us the answer? (Hint: happiness can be measured in units called roses.)</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>17:40</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Grateful Dead</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/142828815/grateful.mp3" fileSize="4900000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/142828815/grateful.mp3" length="4900000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/grateful.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Why Make a Matrix? And Why You Might Be in One</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>More Matrix and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Are you a flesh-and-blood person, or an electrical impulse on a circuit board somewhere? According to famous philosopher Nick Bostrom, there's a high probability that you and everyone you know are living in a matrix. Think it's farfetched? Listen as Bostrom's persuasive arguments paint a picture of a computer-simulated reality with citizens just like you.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>24:58</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, matrix, virtual reality, nick bostrom, artificial intelligence, AI</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/155662314/more_matrix.mp3" fileSize="6300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/155662314/more_matrix.mp3" length="6300000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/more_matrix.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Knowing When to Be Afraid: Rationality and Suspense</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Hitchcock and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>It's a situation familiar to us all: You're in love with an attractive sleazeball, and you can't tell if your paramour is evil to the core and to be feared, or basically a good person. Will love cloud your judgment? The authors argue that Hitchcock builds suspense with this scenario, and that his characters must be rational, astute, and committed to the truth in order to prevail. Happy Halloween!</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>28:31</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Hitchcock, suspense, horror, evil, rationality, birds, halloween</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/175508161/hitch2.mp3" fileSize="7200000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/175508161/hitch2.mp3" length="7200000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/hitch2.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Pink Floyd: From Pompeii to Philosophy</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Pink Floyd and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary> Delve into all things philosophical and Pink Floyd-ical. Popular Culture and Philosophy series editor and super-genius George Reisch introduces the latest volume, Pink Floyd and Philosophy, explaining why this seminal psychedelic rock group belongs is the philosophical canon alongside Kant, Hume, and Nietzsche. Set the controls for the heart of philosophy, and listen in.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>14:02</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Pink Floyd</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/184325490/floyd_intro.mp3" fileSize="3500000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/184325490/floyd_intro.mp3" length="3500000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/floyd_intro.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Quentin Tarantino and the Ex-Convict's Dilemma</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Quentin Tarantino and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>The "Mexican Standoff," in which two or more people have weapons (usually guns) pointed at one another, is common occurence in most Quentin Tarantino films. This is essentially a philosophical paradox called a prisoner's dilemma. In Tarantino territory, is there a solution to this perplexing puzzle?</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>25:02</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Quentin Tarantino, Kill Bill, movies</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/226787445/tarantino.mp3" fileSize="6900000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/226787445/tarantino.mp3" length="6900000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/tarantino.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>"I Hate Pink Floyd," and Other Fashion Mistakes of the 1960s, '70s, and Beyond</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Pink Floyd and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Was Johnny Rotten right to wear a t-shirt proclaiming I Hate Pink Floyd? We say no. Listen as George Reisch defends Pink Floyd, arguing that they rose above the vacuous corporate rock of the 70s and avoided selling out.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>28:24</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Pink Floyd, punk rock, Johnny Rotten</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/303981177/hate_pink.mp3" fileSize="7100000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/303981177/hate_pink.mp3" length="7100000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/hate_pink.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<item>
	<title>What Lies Beneath? Distinguishing Humans from Skinjobs</title>
	<author>ereitz@caruspub.com</author>
	<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~3/93966036/podcast.htm</link>
	<itunes:author>Open Court</itunes:author>
	<itunes:subtitle>Battlestar and Philosophy</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Available here for the first time ever: bonus content not available in the book <em>Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy</em>. Caroline Ruddell explores the difference between humans and their near-identical Cylon skinjob counterparts.</itunes:summary>
	
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:00:00 CST</pubDate>
<itunes:duration>30:01</itunes:duration>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<itunes:keywords>Popular Culture and Philosophy, philosophy, Battlestar Galactica, robots, skinjobs, Cylons</itunes:keywords>
<media:content url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/329916590/battlestar_ruddell.mp3" fileSize="7600000" type="audio/mpeg" /><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~4/93966036"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.opencourtbooks.com/podcast.htm</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PopularCultureAndPhilosophy/~5/329916590/battlestar_ruddell.mp3" length="7600000" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://opencourtbooks.com/podcasts/battlestar_ruddell.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item>
<media:credit role="author">Open Court Podcasts</media:credit><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating><media:description type="plain">Your regular dose of philosophy from Open Court's Popular Culture and Philosophy series. Get philosophical about your favorite movies, t.v. shows, rock bands, and much more. Download chapters in MP3 format. Visit us at opencourtbooks.com. The latest episo</media:description></channel>
</rss>
