<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Press Gazette - Latest Comments</title><link>http://pressgazette.disqus.com/</link><description>For all journalists</description><atom:link href="https://pressgazette.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:24:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Clarke: Mail Online success not just down to showbiz  - Press Gazette</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=44229&amp;sectioncode=1#comment-6595118134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I Bring eventually with others similar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sathvik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toffs at the top - Press Gazette</title><link>http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:SLrsQ304Y7sJ:www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp%3Fstorycode%3D34562+kent+college+pembury+news&amp;cd=34&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=uk#comment-6552634892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I Borrow exactly with side energetic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sathvik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:36:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh wave of redundancies at Telegraph</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fresh-wave-redundancies-telegraph#comment-2696887828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem a tad sensitive which is quite unlike a British hack. You guys, I have been led to believe, are supposed to be quite thick skinned types. I just made the observation that a newspaper which espouses free market principles and has backed the Conservatives at every election since...well the dawn of time I guess, would understand the need for these redundancies. I am sure they would understand as they explained to Tata Steel workers, coal miners, ship-builders, railway workers, and many others over the years that jobs cannot be protected. When there is technological change and a downturn in demand for your product or service you cannot expect special favours from the government or sympathy from anyone. You have to..."get on your bike" and find alternative employment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You ask whether I loath only pro-right wing newspapers. It is, of course, a fact, that there is only one non-right-wing quality newspaper (The Guardian) and one non-right-wing tabloid (The Daily Mirror). That's quite depressing because the Conservatives got about 37% of the popular vote at the last election, representing just 25% of the electorate. It is not the case that 100% of the readers of all newspaper apart from the two mentioned support the Conservatives. Of course people are free to buy whichever newspapers they like. What is totally unacceptable is that these grossly unrepresentative newspapers lead the broadcast news. The EU referendum is a case in point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shahid Khan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 13:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh wave of redundancies at Telegraph</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fresh-wave-redundancies-telegraph#comment-2696525963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You do take a slightly worrying delight in any development to the detriment of journalists. Do you loathe all media, just print media, just people who work for pro-right publications (even if they hold quite different views but try to do their job with professionalism and integrity)? Which of the named  Telegraph casualties do you especially despise if it's not just a hatred of all? Tell us what kind of journalists and journalism you actually applaud and also tell us what you do for a living so that we can start to scrutinise your trade of profession.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colin  Randall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 10:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warning that Land Registry sell-off threatens journalism and public&amp;#039;s right to know</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/warning-land-registry-sell-threatens-journalism-and-publics-right-know#comment-2696156719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolute insanity!!! Has Press Gazette  set up a petition to obstruct this as yet?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurence de Mello</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 06:11:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guardian asked government to &amp;#039;clip wings&amp;#039; of BBC, not Rupert Murdoch press</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/guardian-asked-government-clip-wings-bbc-not-rupert-murdoch-press#comment-2695746263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We would need to see exactly what The Guardian said. This politician's statements are pretty loosely worded.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oscar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 22:14:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New police media guidelines iset out new wide-ranging controls on contact between officers and journalists</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/new-police-media-guidelines-iset-out-new-wide-ranging-controls-contact-between-officers-and#comment-2695404065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bit of a change from the mid  60s when I covered five  Islington police stations.  The desk sergeant would usually hand over the incident book with the words : "have a butchers at this and take your pick. " Even in later years,  a daily natter on the phone with the control room sergeant,  the local DCI or divisional supt was the norm.  Now it's some policespeak press officer telling you why they can't arrange a chat with a real bobby to find out what's really been happening  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prodnose</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 17:33:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guardian asked government to &amp;#039;clip wings&amp;#039; of BBC, not Rupert Murdoch press</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/guardian-asked-government-clip-wings-bbc-not-rupert-murdoch-press#comment-2695114029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, The Guardian is so mixed up these days it's hard to believe it has any coherent policy, apart from undermining Jeremy Corbyn at every turn.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Exhack2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 14:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh wave of redundancies at Telegraph</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fresh-wave-redundancies-telegraph#comment-2694635785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Before or after shutting down a newspaper, sacking the staff and offering them and their contacts up to prosecutors...?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carlosfandango</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 10:27:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guardian asked government to &amp;#039;clip wings&amp;#039; of BBC, not Rupert Murdoch press</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/guardian-asked-government-clip-wings-bbc-not-rupert-murdoch-press#comment-2694627157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it depends what you mean by 'clip its wings'. I don't think the Guardian wanted the BBC to be run by a Tory-controlled Board.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shahid Khan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 10:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh wave of redundancies at Telegraph</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fresh-wave-redundancies-telegraph#comment-2694617320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Murdoch has invested close to $1bn in the British legal profession. How about that lesson?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shahid Khan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 10:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh wave of redundancies at Telegraph</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fresh-wave-redundancies-telegraph#comment-2694545603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;maybe the Telegraph should take a lesson from Murdoch and invest in journalism&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moaning mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 09:30:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New police media guidelines iset out new wide-ranging controls on contact between officers and journalists</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/new-police-media-guidelines-iset-out-new-wide-ranging-controls-contact-between-officers-and#comment-2694301493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this a joke ? Two words; Cliff Richard !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rabbitaway</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 05:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New police media guidelines iset out new wide-ranging controls on contact between officers and journalists</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/new-police-media-guidelines-iset-out-new-wide-ranging-controls-contact-between-officers-and#comment-2694274344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daily dialogue with local police was an integral aspect of local news coverage when I trained in the late 80s; a shed had some tools taken at number 20; two cars were broken into by the park on Sunday night... small stuff. That relationship simply does not exist now - the paper I worked for now has no local police door to knock on; it has to call a press office 15 miles away. When I revisited as a news editor more recently, and tried to chase small space-filling, low-level crime stories, the sort that are crucial grist to credible local news, a press officer told me: "No, it doesn't work like that now, you have to ask me about a specific incident, and we can then confirm what we know about it." Hence they are removing the proactive news reporting of grass-roots, low-level crime. Why on earth would they want to do this, you might ask, the no-brainer corollary being "why wouldn't they"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Hacker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 05:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New police media guidelines iset out new wide-ranging controls on contact between officers and journalists</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/new-police-media-guidelines-iset-out-new-wide-ranging-controls-contact-between-officers-and#comment-2694235175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Control is power and power controls, which is exactly what these guidelines are designed for. They are not meant to enhance effective communication between Investigating Officers and the media which if dealt with properly would enable greater effectiveness in bringing offenders to justice and supporting victims. In a few years time very few if any police officers will have any media experience which would be a tremendous loss of skills. Instead it will be in the hands of those not directly engaged in Crime Investigation or prevention, those who sit behind desks and think only of their own careers rather than public service. These are bad guidelines and further enhances the belief we are entering a Police State.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davidson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 04:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh wave of redundancies at Telegraph</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fresh-wave-redundancies-telegraph#comment-2694146082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A newspaper that's gone to the dogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ted hagan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 02:27:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sun still most popular UK newspaper with more than 13m readers, according to survey</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/sun-still-most-popular-uk-newspaper-more-13m-readers-according-survey#comment-2693795373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Guardian is read by psychotic dictator personalities who will not be happy until every child is a transgender vegan sex-change case-study by the time they are 5 years old. Fortunately the paper is in dire financial straits and will not last another decade.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reresby Rookwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 20:35:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh wave of redundancies at Telegraph</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/fresh-wave-redundancies-telegraph#comment-2693100800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure the free market telegraph hacks will understand the need for this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shahid Khan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 13:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes at Telegraph HQ include review of pay to keep top talent and hot-desking</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/changes-telegraph-hq-include-review-pay-keep-top-talent-and-hot-desking#comment-2692879811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Next: Only 2 pencils a year, say Barclay Bros, "We're down to our last £6 Billion!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Toffer99</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 11:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Author appointed ITV News economics editor</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/author-appointed-itv-news-economics-editor#comment-2692556296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How astonishing that in an article on the appointment of this woman you couldn't find space to mention the - highly relevant - fact that she is married to the former head of BBC TV, Danny Cohen. She's vastly experienced as an economist, maybe, but there are many, many other highly qualified expert economists. The only difference is they aren't married to the former head of BBC TV.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kaymanaisle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 06:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google challenges French right to be forgotten ruling that could see stories blocked worldwide</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/google-challenges-french-right-be-forgotten-ruling-could-see-stories-blocked-worldwide#comment-2692160390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Google who cherry-pick their artificial country base for financial reasons are trying to tell the French what they should do and pontificating on the laws of various countries all of which they studiously avoid when a person tries to sue them claiming they are either US based or elsewhere depending on how it advantages their case. Some hope. The French will succeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oscar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 22:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes at Telegraph HQ include review of pay to keep top talent and hot-desking</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/changes-telegraph-hq-include-review-pay-keep-top-talent-and-hot-desking#comment-2691064736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear old Murdoch .... playing into Private Eye on cue!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 12:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Research: UK national daily newspaper coverage strongly favours pro-Brexit argument</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/research-uk-national-daily-newspaper-coverage-strongly-favours-pro-brexit-argument#comment-2691058276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I suppose this loosely translates into the state of popularity (or otherwise) of the government?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 12:37:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Star censured by IPSO after reporting untrue Pippa and Harry romance rumours</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/daily-star-censured-ipso-after-reporting-untrue-pippa-and-harry-romance-rumours#comment-2687029137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to work with the news editor. A good journalist. Taught me a lot. Backed up his reporters. Good at spotting a decent story. The industry's changing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hackademic</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 17:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IPSO shows it has backbone with Sun Brexit ruling, but editor&amp;#039;s defiance undermines press self regulation</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/ipso-shows-it-has-backbone-sun-brexit-ruling-editors-defiance-undermines-press-self#comment-2687020209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps those newspapers may lay claim to a moral higher ground because they are quality publications rather than scandal rags?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hackademic</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 17:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>