Priority Services Group

Capital Gains Rates Revisited

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:52:00 +0000

SOME VERY USEFUL INFORMATION

In this edition of the Real Estate Revolution, we will share some useful information that is to short to warrant a single newsletter.

CAPITAL GAINS RATES REVISITED

Exactly what Capital Gains rate applies to the sale of your property depends on several things, including when you bought the property, when you sold it, your overall income level and sometimes what tax-code changes are made in the meantime.

Currently, capital gains may be taxed at 5 percent, 15 percent and 25 percent or a combination of rates (These lower rates are scheduled to end on Dec. 31, 2010). These tax levels are known as long-term capital gains and apply to property that you hold for not less than 366 days (more than one year). The long-term capital gain tax is, generally, much lower than what you pay on your regular income.

In fact, it is a taxpayer's income level that generally determines which capital gains rate is owed. If your profit pushes you into a higher bracket, you could possibly be taxed at a combination of rates. And you could face yet another rate depending upon the type of property you sell.

Remember, each of the rates state here are the "long-term" capital gains rates. In most cases, that means you have to hold a property for more than a year before you sell it (366 days). If you cash it in sooner, you'll be taxed at the "short-term" rate, which is the same as your ordinary income tax level, which could be as high as 35 percent.

5-PERCENT RATE: This capital gains rate applies to taxpayers in the 10-percent income tax brackets. They will pay a maximum 5-percent long-term gains rate on property they held for more than 366 days.

15-PERCENT RATE: This most widely paid capital gains tax rate applies to long-term investments by individuals in the 25-percent or higher tax brackets. When you hear "lower capital gains rate," it generally means this level, because there are few investors with incomes low enough to qualify solely for the 5-percent rate.

25-PERCENT RATE (RECAPTURE OF DEPRECIATION): This rate applies to part of the gain from selling real estate that you have previously depreciated. Basically, this keeps you from getting a double tax break. The Internal Revenue Service will first recapture some of the tax breaks you've been getting via depreciation. You'll have to use Schedule D to figure your gain (and tax rate) for this property, known as Section 1250 property. More details on this type of holding and its taxation are available in chapter three of IRS Publication 544, Sales and other Dispositions of Property.

CAPITAL GAINS AND YOUR VACATION HOME

One mistake people make is thinking that because their vacation home is a residence, the capital-gains tax exclusion applies says lawyer William Abrams, a partner with Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson LLP, a law firm in New York. "They say, 'It's a house. I am not going to have to pay capital gains tax on it when I sell it," says Mr. Abrams. That's not the case, he says. In actuality, the capital-gains tax exclusion ($250,00 non-taxable capital gain per spouse), generally applies only to principal residences, says Mr. Abrams, whose practice includes tax law. Vacation or second homes don't normally qualify.

UNDERSTANDING A HOMES ADJUSTED BASIS

What is known as a home's "adjusted basis" figures prominently into how a gain or loss is calculated after a residential property is sold. A home's "adjusted basis" is how much a homeowner originally paid for a house, including closing and settlement costs and debt (this doesn't include mortgages other than the original mortgage though), plus any qualifying home improvements made. These qualifying home improvements include ONLY items that increase the value of the property like a pool, another room, new roof etc.

For Uncle Sam, the gain or loss on your home sale is calculated by subtracting the adjusted basis from your selling price (less any related expenses (like qualifying home improvements) BUT not ANY of the debt other than the original mortgage). Therefore, the larger your adjusted basis, the less your gain may be (in the IRS's eyes), which may reduce your tax load.

IRS INSTALLMENT SALES

An installment sale is a sale of property where you receive at least one payment after the tax year of the sale. If you dispose of property in an installment sale, you report part of your gain when you receive each installment payment. NOTE: You cannot use the installment method to report a loss.

General Rules: If a sale qualifies as an installment sale, the gain must be reported under the installment method unless you elect out of using the installment method OR you are not a qualified "accrual" method taxpayer. Most people/entities use the "cash" method of accounting and not the "accrual" method of accounting.

References/Related Topics

Form 6252, Installment Sale Income (PDF)

Publication 537 Installment Sales

Please visit www.priorityservicellc.com for lots more info regarding capital gains

The Depreciation Recapture Tax Trap Part 2

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:46:00 +0000

In this edition of the Real Estate Revolution, we will provide our readers with an understanding of depreciation.

Wow! The recently passed tax law just lowered the capital gain tax rate to 15%... great, uh? Well yes, but not so fast! We all know how important it is to understand how the tax law affects our real estate investments. Understanding and forecasting the tax ramifications of rental property ownership is a critical step in the screening and decision making process. Misunderstanding and misapplying the tax law during your analysis can result in ghastly surprises.

As a real estate investor, you can depreciate our rental property and enjoy the positive cash flow resulting from write-off of tax depreciation. Tax depreciation helps shelter rental income that is subject to "ordinary income" rates which is generally higher than capital gain rates. The depreciation taken reduces our property's tax basis, which effectively increases our tax gain when we later sell. If the property is later sold at a gain, this gain may have resulted from the depreciation previously taken. To the extent the gain is attributable to depreciation taken, this gain is generally referred to as "recapture", or Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 1250 gain.

The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 imposed a 25% capital gains tax rate for unreceptive IRC Section 1250 gains. When coupled with the changes made by the 2003 Tax Act, all depreciation taken can give rise to a higher rate of tax than the newly reduced 15% long-term gain rate. The effect of which is that you will most likely pay more tax upon the sale of a rental property than the 15%.

By way of example, let's assume you purchase a rental property today for $100,000. The total tax depreciation you plan to take over your estimated ownership period is $25,000. You also project the property will be worth $140,000 when it is time to exit your investment. Your projected tax gain will be $65,000 ($140,000 less $75,000 ($100,000 cost less $25,000 depreciation)). Since your gain is greater than your accumulated tax depreciation, the recapture rule will apply. As a result, your tax on sale is not $9,750 ($65,000 x 15%), but rather $12,250, 25.6% more in taxes than what you planned!

The amount subject to the higher (25% or ordinary) rates is limited to the gain on the Sec. 1250 property. If the gain is allocable primarily to the land, the rate of tax on the overall gain from sale may be brought back toward the lower 15% long-term rate. The consequences could range from no benefit for buildings, which have increased in value above their original acquisition basis, to significant benefit where a building is close to the point of being demolished, the principal value component being the land.

In summary, make sure you take into consideration the potential depreciation recapture tax bite when performing your cash flow and rate-of-return analysis.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Adding insult to injury, ALL transaction wherein the investor have depreciated their property, the taxman will expect to receive Self Employment taxes of 15.3% on the first $97,500 of income received by the investor. Depreciation is truly a tax trap for the unwary.

Real Estate Investors Beware!

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:50:00 +0000

The depreciation recapture tax trap part1

In this edition, Priority Services Group will help our readers understand depreciation.

You cannot exclude from taxation any gains, which are attributed to the depreciation you claimed after May 6, 1997. I'll explain what that means in a minute.

You have owned the rental property for 11 years (which means you bought the property in 1995), and you rented out the property starting in 1997 (after living there for two years), it is likely that all or most of your depreciation will be recaptured.

Here's what recapture means. It means you have to pay tax on the gains that are attributed to depreciation. And these gains are taxed at your ordinary income tax rates, not at the much lower long-term capital gains tax rates. This is explained in IRS Publication 523, Selling Your Home, in the section entitled Business Use or Rental of Home (link to IRS Web site).

Let's provide an example with numbers to illustrate how depreciation recapture works in real life. I'm going to be making these numbers up. Your actual tax situation will be different. Let's say you bought the home for $120,000. And you started renting out the house on July 1, 1997. (This is conveniently located after the May 6, 1997, cutoff date. I'm trying not to have a math headache today.) You would have claimed $2,000 in depreciation in 1997, $4,363 in 1998, and $4,363 every full year after that that your property was rented out. So let's say the property was last rented in December 2005. This would give you eight full years of depreciation, and one partial year of depreciation, for a total of $36,904. This total depreciation is what accountants call "accumulated depreciation."

Accumulated depreciation reduces your cost basis in the property. So your initial cost of $120,000 gets reduced by this accumulated depreciation of $36,904, leaving you with an "adjusted cost basis" of $83,096. There may be other adjustments to your cost basis as well, such as capital improvements (roof, foundation, etc.).

Now, let's say the house will be worth $250,000 when it is sold, and you plan to sell the house after meeting the two-out-of-five year rule. The selling price minus the adjusted cost basis will equal the gain or loss. In this case, $250,000 minus $83,096 equals a gain of $166,904. Here's where the fun begins. Of this gain, the first $83,096 is taxed at ordinary income tax rates as depreciation recapture. (These are called "ordinary gains.") The remainder is considered capital gains. The capital gain portion in our example is $166,904 total gain minus $83,096 ordinary gain equals $83,808 capital gain. Only capital gain portion can be excluded under Section 121, up to the limits I mentioned above. As long as you live there a total of 24 months out of the 60 months preceding the sale of the house, these capital gains can be excluded.

Now, I hear a tiny voice somewhere saying, "Ah, well what if I didn't claim any depreciation? Then I won't have to recapture the depreciation." This wily tax strategy is already anticipated in the tax law. You must recapture depreciation you actually claimed or could have claimed for renting out the house.

The bottom line, in this example, is that your total gain is partially excluded and partially taxed. You will report the sale on IRS Form 4797 (Sale of Business Property).

Because of the complexity of your tax situation, now would be a good time to make friends with a tax professional. You will need to gather documents to accurately calculate your adjusted cost basis. Very likely, your tax professional will provide additional tips of what documents to gather.

Additional resources

Selling Your Home: Capital Gains Taxes

Selling Your Home, IRS Publication 523

How To Depreciate Property, IRS Publication 946

Residential Rental Property, IRS Publication 527

When Must You Recapture the Deduction, from Publication 946

A collapsing real estate market, how can you survive?

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:34:00 +0000

The Escrow Recovery Program can help during a collapsing real estate market

In today’s collapsing real estate market property sellers need all the help they can get in order to retain as much of their hard earned equity (profit) as they can. Unfortunately, this declining market is expected to worsen over the next 12 months while the market attempts to stabilize.

However, it is interesting to note that real estate IS selling in almost every market, but those properties that are selling are those that are “priced right” for the market they are in. In a “down market” such as the one we are in, having your property priced to sell (priced right) will make the difference between selling and not selling.

OK, now that we have stated the obvious, lets discuss what can be done to overcome these problems and effectuate a profitable sale. Some people have resorted to the use of what is called a 1031 exchange. This is a suitable alternative should you not need to receive any funds from the sale of your property and you don’t have a problem with the process requiring you to purchase another “like-kind” property through a disinterested third party who you MUST use to handle your transaction within a very narrow time frame. However, this tax deferral program will catch up to every participant when they stop trading one property for another and want some cash from the sale of their property. At that time, ALL the taxes that would have been paid on each sale (transfer) are combined into one giant tax bill that in many cases becomes far more onerous than if you had paid the taxes on each sale (transfer).

There is another little known and much misunderstood alternative that most CPAs and other professionals have overlooked for years. That is an Internal Revenue Code Section 351 transfer. Like a 1031 exchange, it is a tax deferral process but one that can and will eliminate much of the cumbersome aspects inherent in 1031 exchanges.

In the 351 process you need not purchase a “like-kind” property, don’t need third parties to officiate the transaction, can defer (and possible eliminate) all taxability related to the sale of the property and the 351 exchange WILL allow program participants to receive cash from the sale without penalty.

How a 351 exchange works:The 351 exchange is a process whereby a property owner creates a specially crafted C-Corporation and exchanges the “basis” they currently have in their property for the stock of the corporation. When exchanged, the stock becomes “valued” at the “basis” that the property was valued at. Then, when the corporation sells the property, the Internal Revenue Code considers the income as the “ordinary income” of the corporation and not as a capital gain to the corporation. Thus, eliminating federal capital gains taxes all Additionally, by incorporating the corporation in a tax-free jurisdiction such as Nevada, you WILL eliminate state taxes as well together.

OK, so what’s the big deal about ordinary income? Ordinary income is the income generated in the ordinary course of the business of a company. For example, a new car dealership purchases cars to sell. These cars are considered inventory in the Internal Revenue Code. When a car is sold, the income derived in commingled with the income derived from servicing the cars and the parts the dealership sells for the cars. This income is never considered capital gains. This is a very important concept to understand. People think that real estate is always a capital asset. That is not true. Should your corporation be in the real estate business you are selling “inventory” and not a capital assets. Hence, capital gains are eliminated.

Now, if this income is ordinary to the business then it stands to reason that that same business can “write-off” its ordinary business expenses that relate to the acquisition of that income as well as the costs associated with making those sales.

In the real estate business what could those deductible expenses be? Travel to view properties that you might want as inventory or as rental property. Vehicles, office space (could be in your home) computers, telephones, health insurance, life insurance, retirement plans, the purchase of more “inventory”, consulting fees, club dues, entertainment and a host of additional items.

Better still, all these expenses are paid with pre-tax dollars not after tax dollars, as they are when you sell property or conduct the business of real estate through any other process.

Here is a truism the reader should understand:

Individuals receive income, pay taxes and then buy things with the “after tax” money. Conversely, “C”-Corporations receive income, buy things with “pre-tax” dollars and then pay taxes on any money left over.

So, the bottom line is this. In a “down market” the property seller must become very competitive in their pricing if they want to sell their property. If you as the seller continue to try to sell using those outmoded methods (selling a property titled in your name or undertaking a 1031 exchange) you will face the maximum in taxability and thereby needlessly loose far to much of your hard earned equity (profits). Should you undertake our 351-exchange program you will receive 15% to 45% more net income at the closing of the escrow from the sale of you property. This extra cash can afford you the ability to reduce your sale price making your property more appealing while at the same time not affecting your net income at the close of the escrow.

To find out more visit our website at www.priorityservicellc.com and request our free reports

The Esentials of Corporate Estate Planning

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:16:00 +0000

A CORPORATION NEVER DIES; IT JUST GETS A NEW PRESIDENT

Moving your estate into your corporation is very advantageous with Nevada C-Corporations. We will take a look at how you pass your estate to your families without probate and attorney's costs through C-corporations. Many approaches to family estate planning are legitimate, and often effective ways of preserving family estates, but consider the rapidly changing tax and legal trends when looking to preserve a lifetime of hard-earned assets.

Planning for the next generation is important. Currently the value of your estate that can be transferred to heirs tax-free is $2,000,000 and the exemption will gradually increase during the next couple of years to no taxes at all (in 2010). Keep in mind that at any time Congress can change this rule. If a Democratic administration takes place it has been said they would like to change this to as little as they can get away with. After this unified credit that we receive, the taxes on the remaining average 45%. Some individuals think there is no way their estate would be subject to the estate tax because it’s only for the extremely wealthy. Think again; just add up the value of all your assets, real estate, cash, jewelry, bank accounts, brokerage accounts AND the value of your life insurance. The life insurance is tax-free but the value is added into your estate value for determining estate taxes. Start making plans, because there are creative, preventative measures to keep the government out of your pocket.

THE ESTATE PLAN THAT NEVER DIES: Many creative estate-planning strategies have been developed for use by Nevada C-Corporations. Nevada C-Corporations are generally more flexible and creative when passing estates to heirs than living trusts are, while providing similar benefits such as avoiding probate, and potentially eliminating all estate taxes. There is an old saying that is as true today as it was 100 years ago.

“A CORPORATION NEVER DIES; IT JUST GETS A NEW PRESIDENT.”

HERE IS HOW THIS PROCESS WORKS: Long Term Corporate Planning is not just estate planning. Estate planning by itself is done in contemplation of death, and such planning has tax implications and interpretations by the IRS that simply don’t apply here. Long Term Corporate Planning is not done in contemplation of death, but when you do pass on and your living estate happens to be very successfully handled due to your foresight in long term corporate planning, then you have successfully accomplished a dynamic feat.

WHY IS THIS A DYNAMIC FEAT? Because with your Long Term Corporate Planning little is left for a lawyer to do. Legal expenses or taxes don’t consume your estate. That’s why some lawyers aren’t going to tell you how to take advantage of Long Term Corporate Planning. It is bad for their business. The tax collectors aren’t going to tell you either because they won’t be able to rip apart the results of your life’s work with taxes.

WHAT’S THE MAGIC? Well, corporations are immortal (unless terminated by statute or by its corporate articles). Corporations do not cease to exist because one of their key people dies. Here is where Nevada really shines; it allows its C-corporations to issue “bearer shares.”

BEARER SHARES. Nevada allows corporations to issue stock to the “bearer,” which is very much like writing a check to “cash.” The person who controls the bearer certificates, or has the

shares in their possession, technically has the power to redeem those shares as the beneficial owner. As a negotiable instrument, it may be difficult to determine how many times the stock has changed hands since it was first issued.

Bearer shares are generally considered to be an attractive solution for individuals who desire to own or control assets or business activities, while maintaining a high degree of financial privacy. It is true that privacy can be accomplished through bearer share ownership, however there are many issues, which are broadly misunderstood regarding the use of bearer shares.

Most states base their corporate law extensively on the Revised Model Business Corporation Act as developed by the Committee on Corporate Laws of the American Bar Association. It should not surprise you then that there are amazing similarities in the Corporation Codes of the various states. However, because the Model Act has been refined and modified over time, and because of the stubborn independence of the various states not to conform entirely to the Model Act, each state has developed its own eccentricities that set it apart from the others.

In Nevada’s case, one area in which it separates its Corporation Code from the Model Act is in the information required on the stock certificate of a C-Corporation. Under the Model Act, for instance, a stock certificate is required to contain: 1) the name of the issuing corporation and the state under which it is organized; 2) the name of the person to whom the stock is issued; and 3) the number and class of shares and the designation of the series, if any, the certificate represents.

The Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) reads differently, and by omission of the language of the Model Act, creates an opportunity to issue shares of a Nevada Corporation to “The Bearer.” NRS 78.235(1) reads in part as follows: “every stockholder is entitled to have a certificate, signed by officers or agents designated by the corporation for the purpose, certifying the number of shares owned by him in the corporation.”

In other words Nevada law, specifically, only requires two things: 1) the name of the corporation, and; 2) the number of shares represented by the certificate (according to an attorney with the Nevada Attorney General’s office assigned to the Nevada Secretary of State’s office). Nevada is the only state with this language. Since the name of the shareholder is not specifically required on the certificate, there has been broad use and acceptance of bearer shares in the State of Nevada for many years.

Even so, officials with Nevada agencies such as the Attorney General’s office, the Securities Division and Corporation Division of the Secretary of State’s office, are reluctant to take an official position one way or the other on bearer shares. There are no Attorney General opinions on this issue, and surprisingly, there is absolutely no case law on the subject. The most positive affirmation I have received on the viability of bearer shares came from Mr. John Cunningham, an attorney with the Securities Division, who confirmed that bearer shares could be used as long as the corporation was not required to qualify for a public offering.

WHY BEARER SHARES ARE USED: There are two clear reasons why a corporation would issue bearer shares. First, as a tool to achieve total privacy in corporate ownership due to the fact that true ownership is extremely difficult to determine. Secondly, as a vehicle to provide for convenient transfer of ownership interests. Let’s discuss these individually.

PRIVACY: There are only two tangible sources of information on ownership of a Nevada Corporation: the stock certificate, and the stock ledger. The stock ledger has its own legal requirements under Nevada law. The ledger must contain, in alphabetical order, the names of the stockholders, their residence address, and the number of shares owned by each.

This list must be revised annually, and would be a significant document for a legal adversary to obtain. However, Nevada law provides a statutory barrier to getting and using information on the stock ledger that includes it's own penalties. As discussed above, NRS 78.257 provides that any stockholder who owns at least 15% of the issued shares of a corporation has a right to inspect all books and records upon five days notice, but must bear the costs of such an inspection. But subsection 3 of that statute states that, “Any stockholder or other person exercising (these rights) who uses or attempts to use information, documents, records or other data obtained from the corporation, for any purpose not related to the stockholder’s interest in the corporation as a stockholder, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.” (Emphasis added).

In other words, the penalty for using corporate information for any other purpose than to have a stockholder defend or demonstrate his or her interest in the corporation is up to one year in the county jail and up to a $2,000 fine. Clearly, a non-shareholder in a Nevada Corporation has no legal right or authority whatsoever to view the stock ledger. However, the burden of proof; in the cases of Roney v. Buckland, 4, Nev 619 (1868), falls on the corporation to prove improper motivation for such a request.

TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP: Most of the confusion surrounding bearer shares has to deal with the issue of transfer of ownership. A bearer instrument is negotiated differently than an instrument made payable to order. If an instrument is made payable to the order of John Doe, it is negotiated by delivery with any necessary endorsement (signature and proof of identity). If an instrument is made payable to bearer, it is negotiated by delivery. It is commonly believed that bearer shares allow you to transfer ownership of a Nevada C-Corporation in complete privacy, without any adverse impact. Three important facts must be established on this topic:

1. A stock certificate is not stock itself. The stockholder may own the stock with or without the stock certificate. The Nevada Attorney General has published a formal opinion on this subject (AGO38). The certificate is merely a piece of paper that indicates ownership. Because Nevada does not require corporations to issue certificates at all, it would be foolish to assume that possession of the certificate equals ownership of the shares.

2. The Nevada Revised Statute (78.240) specifically states that shares of stock are personal property. So, all rules, regulations, and applicable taxes that would otherwise apply to transfers of personal property will also apply to transfers of bearer shares.

Bearer share certificates, like personal property, may be stolen, borrowed, obtained under false pretenses, lost, copied, sold, inherited, bought, willed, etc. My car is personal property also. On occasion, I have lent my car to a friend. Simply because he was in possession of my car during that time did not mean he was the owner.

3. Nevada case law requires a transfer of stock to be registered upon the corporation’s books before the transfer is valid against the corporation. This is done to protect corporate officers in determining ownership of and the right to vote corporate shares. (61 Nev. 431, 132 P.2d 605. (1942)). So can bearer shares be used to transfer ownership of a Nevada Corporation? Absolutely. But the new owner must register his/her/its ownership with the corporation before the corporation can grant ownership with those protections in place, the only other tangible source of ownership information is found on the stock certificate itself. A bearer certificate could only be considered circumstantial.

BEARER SHARES AND THEIR USE IN TRANSFERRING CORPORATE ASSETS TO HEIRS: Here is how to use bearer shares to eliminate any problems regarding passing the corporation on to your heirs when you die:

1. When you issue the shares of stock in your corporation, issue them by putting the word “bearer” in the blank for the name of the person receiving the stock and use the address of the corporation for the address of the bearer.

2. Next, split up the stock the way you want it distributed to your spouse, children, relatives and/or friends after your death.

3. Next, place the shares into individual SEALED envelopes and write on the outside of the envelopes: DO NOT OPEN EVEN UPON MY DEATH. INSTEAD, GIVE THIS SEALED ENVELOPE TO XXXXXXX.

4. Once provided to your “heirs”, upon your death, each will open their individual envelopes and because they now represent the shareholders of the corporation, they need only hold a shareholder meeting and create a resolution electing a new president (and/or officers and directors) and create a new resolution changing the signatories on the corporate bank account.

It’s that simple. Almost without a hick-up, the corporation has moved on to the next generation. This is only possible with a Nevada corporation because for all other states, shareholders are a matter of public record and bearer shares are not available. Thus when a shareholder dies, the stock of that shareholder MUST be shown as part of the estate and probated if not otherwise held in a living trust.

Your heirs now have the stock and they own the corporation, but you while living, have complete control of the corporation, its assets, its money, real estate — everything. You can sell these assets and pay yourself the money, or add to the assets, pay for any and all expenses, travel, medical and so forth. You can do anything you want for as long as you live.

THE BOTTOM LINE RELATING TO CORPORATE ESTATE PLANNING: When you pass on to the “happy campground in the sky”, your heirs already own all you want them to have. If you’ve ever thought of striking back from beyond “the grave”, here’s your chance. Since your heirs already own your estate when you pass on, there’s no transfer, no probate, no taxes -- no problems.

With this plan you know what is going to happen to your loved ones when you pass on. Everything you have worked for, acquired and have is going to the ones you wish it to go to. There won’t be a long drawn-out probate case in court. You can have peace of mind. What can take years of legal delay, astronomical expenses, waste and agony for the ones you love is accomplished by them at their stockholders meeting through the election of directors and officers (probably prearranged). The transition is smooth. Everything continues without interruption. You have the peace, joy, satisfaction and confidence of knowing that your loved ones have exactly what you intend for them to have.

Take advantage of this corporate immortality. Put what you have into a “C” corporation and the corporation will live long past you to successfully distribute your assets to the people you wish to have them. This will eliminate the normal pitfalls of estate planning, probate, and taxes and eliminate the need for a “living Trust or other probate eliminating vehicle.

PLEASE CONTACT PRIORITY SERVICES GROUP, LLC FOR A FREE CONSULTATION AND/OR TO LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR SERVICES AND PRODUCTS.

Capital Gains Tax reality, Personal VS. Corporation, can you afford not to Incorporate?

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:50:00 +0000

HERE IS A LOOK AT THE TAXES YOU WOULD BE OBLIGED TO PAY IF YOU WERE SELLING PROPERTY IN YOUR PERSONAL NAME

By selling real estate titled in your name or the name of a “pass-through” entity (LLC or “S”-Corp) you could pay as much as 60% of the income you receive from the sale in taxes. Those taxes include but are not limited to capital gains taxes, self-employment taxes, Alternative Minimum Tax as well as state and federal income taxes. Adding insult to injury, when you sell real estate titled in your own name or the name of a “pass-through” entity, many of your “real estate business expenses” will not be deductible when you file your 1040 tax return.

INCOME TAXES REPORTED ON YOUR 1040 TAX FORM

The tax effect of selling property as an individual or the name of a “pass-through” entity is that profits made from the sale of real estate are added to the income you report on your 1040 tax return. On the other hand, any losses from the operation of the property are deducted from your 1040 tax return (assuming the losses are not limited by IRS and state passive loss rules). Should you be a high-income earner to begin with, adding the income from the sale of a property to your 1040 tax return could be financially devastating. Likewise for your state tax burden as well.

CAPITAL GAINS TAXES

There Are Three Holding Periods For Capital Assets Sold: Those held for one year or less are considered short-term and are taxed at your ordinary 1040 income tax rate. You'll simply pay taxes at your "normal" 1040 tax rate on those gains (anywhere from 10% to 35%). This could be a “killer” should your taxable gain plus other 1040-income push you into the highest tax bracket. NOTE: Most sales of “flipping” property will fall into this category.

Those held for more than one year are considered long-term, and will be taxed at the rate of 5% for those individuals below the 25% ordinary income tax rate and 15% for those individuals above the 25% ordinary income tax rate, you will receive a tax break on the sale of those assets while those held for more than five years are considered "super-long-term" and are taxed at an even lower rate than long-term gains.

Computing Your Tax Bracket: One very important point to understand about ordinary income/capital gains is that to determine your normal tax bracket for capital gains purposes, your capital gain income is added to your regular income and you use the total (not just the portion related to your earned income). Then you’re able to use Schedule D to compute your tax.

Don't think that if you have $100 in other income and $1 million in long-term capital gains that you're in the 15% bracket -- and that your $1 million in long-term capital gains will be taxed at the preferred 5% rate. It simply doesn’t work that way. You have to add your $1 million to your $100 and then look at your tax bracket.

THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX

Especially vulnerable to the AMT tax are people with income over $75,000. Most vulnerable are taxpayers with several children, interest deductions from second mortgages, capital gains, high state and local taxes and incentive stock options.

Here’s how it works: In effect, you are simply adding back some tax deductions and income exclusions to your regular taxable income to arrive at your alternative minimum taxable income. Here is where the middle class gets soaked. First you have to add back your personal-and dependant-exemption deductions ($3,200 each in 2005, $3,300 each in 2006), then your standard deduction if you don’t itemize $10,300 for joint filers in 2006; $5,150 for singles in 2006). You also lose your state, local and property tax write-offs, as well as your home equity loan interest, if the loan proceeds are not used for home improvements. The AMT also ignores some itemized deductions, such as investments expenses and employee business expenses, and some medical and dental expenses.

Let’s do the math: Under the AMT, adding $1,000 of long term capital gain can increase your taxes buy as much as 22%. 15% is the gain portion and the remaining 7% is the AMT Tax (equaling 22%).

SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES

Self-employment tax (SE tax) is a social security and Medicare tax primarily for individuals who work for themselves. (See IRS Code Section 1402 and/or IRS Publication 533). Publication 533 states that you are self-employed and must pay self employment taxes if:

You Carry On A Trade Or Business: A trade or business is generally an activity carried on for a livelihood or in good faith to make a profit.

You Are A Sole Proprietor: You are a sole proprietor if you own an unincorporated business by yourself or owned by a husband and wife.

Real Estate Rent: Rental income from real estate is NOT included in earnings subject to SE tax UNLESS You provide services for your tenants (you personally manage your properties) or You are a real estate dealer.

REAL ESTATE DEALER STATUS

A real estate dealer is defined as: “An individual who is engaged in the business of selling real estate with a view to the gains and profits that may be derived from such sales.

A negative consequence of the dealer status: If you are considered a real estate dealer, you become ineligible for Section 1031 tax deferred exchanges becaukse the property owned is considered inventory.

CONFUSED YET? MOST PEOPLE ARE BY THIS POINT.
READ ON AND SEE HOW TO LEGALLY ELIMINATE THESE TAXES.

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE TAXES YOU WOULD PAY SHOULD YOU SELL A PROPERTY TITLED IN YOUR NAME OR IN THE NAME OF AN LLC OR “S”-CORPORATION AT THE TIME OF SALE

The premise for this example: You received a check for $49,000.00 at the closing of the escrow for a “FLIPPED” property you purchased and that you held for less than 12 months when you sold it. The property was titled in your name or in the name of an LLC or “S”-Corporation at the time of sale and you are a married person jointly filing a 1040 tax return with your spouse at tax time (you are in the 15% tax bracket).

NOTE: STATE AND LOCAL TAXES NOT INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION.

ESCROW CHECK $49,000

LESS

Self-Employment Taxes (15.3%): (--$7,497)
Capital Gains Taxes (15%): (--$7,350)

Total Federal Tax Obligation from the income received from the sale: (--$14,847)

AFTER TAX PROFIT (FEDERAL TAXES ONLY): $34,153

NOTE If you were required to pay Alternative Minimum Tax, the figures shown above would be even more devastating!

WANT TO MAKE THESE TAXES DISAPPEAR?

Making the taxability disappear: The secret to making the taxability disappear is selling your property in a legal entity controlled by you. One that will afford you exceptional “write-off” capabilities, maximum asset protection and absolute flexibility while at the same time reducing or eliminating the taxes associated with holding and selling real estate.

Internal Revenue Code: Transferring property into your wholly owned “C”-Corp is known as a Section 351 (IRS code section) contribution of property transferred to your controlled entity on a tax-free basis, as no sale to an outside party has occurred.

YOU SAVE BIG $$$ BY SELLING YOUR PROPERTY THROUGH A “C”-CORPORATION!!!

“C”-Corporations are entitled by law to many tax deductions that are not available to individuals, LLCs or “S”-Corps. Additionally, “C”-corporations have a lower federal tax rate at all levels of income up to $250,000 when compared with individuals tax rates for the same level of “TAXABLE” income. (“C”-Corporations pay only 15% tax on the first $50,000 dollars of PROFIT (this is the amount of money left over after all expenses are paid).

NOTE: Individuals receive income, pay taxes and then buy things with the “after tax” money. Conversely, “C”-Corporations receive income, buy things with “pre-tax” dollars and then pay taxes on any money left over.

CORPORATE CAPITAL GAINS

Corporations (in the real estate business) are NOT subject to any capital gains tax liability from the sale of real estate. Instead, corporate gains are included with the rest of the corporate income and therefore become part of the ordinary income of the corporation. Further, the IRS Code makes no distinction between short or long term gains either.

IRS DEALER TAX STATUS AND SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES:

Interestingly, “C”-Corporations are NOT subject to dealer status issues or self-employment tax.

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE TAXES YOU WOULD BE OBLIGED TO PAY SHOULD YOU SELL A PROPERTY TITLED IN THE NAME OF A NEVADA C-CORPORATION AT THE TIME OF SALE

The premise for this example: You received a check for $49,000 at the closing of the escrow for a “FLIPPED” property your held by your C-corporation for less than 12 months when the corporation sold it. The property was titled in the name of your C-corporation at the time of sale.

NOTE: STATE AND LOCAL TAXES NOT INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION.

ESCROW CHECK $49,000
LESS
C Corporation would receive 100%: $49,000
Self-Employment Taxes (15.3%): (NOT APPLICABLE) (-$0000)
Capital Gains Taxes (15%): (NOT APPLICABLE) (-$0000)

Total Tax Obligation: Because the business of the C-corp is buying and selling real estate, the total amount of $49,000 would be classified as “ordinary business income” that can be spent by the corporation to pay for expenses such as: vehicles, health and life insurance, retirement plans and even to purchase additional real estate. Additionally, the C-corp would be required to pay taxes ONLY on the NET amount remaining in the account at the end of the tax year (if any). Should that amount NOT exceed $50,000, the corporation would be taxed at 15%. However, it is possible for the C-corp to “ZERO OUT” its net income and pay NO taxes at all.

AFTER TAX PROFIT (AFTER ZEROING OUT FEDERAL TAXES) $49,000

HERE IS A COMPARISON OF THE TAXES YOU WOULD BE OBLIGED TO PAY SHOULD YOU SELL A PROPERTY TITLED IN YOUR PERSONAL NAME OR IN AN LLC OR “S”-CORP OR THE NAME OF YOUR NEVADA “C”- CORPORATION AT THE TIME OF SALE

The premise for this example: You received a check for $49,000 at the closing of the escrow for a “FLIPPED” property held for less than 12 months when it was sold. The property was titled as shown below at the time of sale (NOTE: state and local taxes not included in the computation).

INDIVIDUAL NEVADA LLC, S-CORP C-CORP

ESCROW CHECK $49,000 $49,000
LESS Self-Employment Taxes (15.3%): (--$7,497) (-$0000)
Capital Gains Taxes (15%): (--$7,350) (-$0000)

Total Federal Tax Obligation from the income received from the sale: (--$14,847) ($0000)*

AFTER TAX PROFIT (FEDERAL TAXES ONLY): $34,153 $49,000**

Total Corporate Federal Tax Obligation: Because the business of the C-Corp is buying and selling real estate, the total amount of $49,000 would be classified as “ordinary business income” that could be spent by the corporation to pay for its ordinary business expenses such as: vehicles, insurance, retirement plans and even to purchase additional real estate. Additionally, the C-Corp would be required to pay taxes ONLY on the NET amount remaining in the account at the end of the tax year (if any). Should that amount NOT exceed $50,000, the corporation would be taxed at 15%. However, it is possible for the C-Corp to “ZERO OUT” its net income and pay NO taxes at all.

**Corporate AMT: The Corporate AMT tax is on the chopping block in 2006. However, unitl it is actually repealed it may apply to those corporations earning in excess of $7.5 million in revenues over a 3-year period. In other words, shouldn’t apply to most of us.

Tax profit after zeroing out federal taxes: Zeroing out your corporate tax obligation should not be a problem for real estate investors should they take advantage of the strategies Priority Services Group will teach you.

Investigate our Escrow Program to find out how these strategies can benefit you. Contact Priority Services Group for a free consultation.

The 351 transfer, take control over capital gains

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:21:00 +0000

In this edition we will provide our readers with a basic overview of the laws behind the little know 351 transfer.

We continue to hear attorneys and CPAs as well as other allegedly knowledgeable professionals frivolously state that the Revolution can't do what it does. Interestingly, all this so-called expert advice is usually stated without the benefit of even having any understanding of how the process really works let alone how the Internal Revenue Code and court cases taken together do, in fact, provide the unquestionable basis for this unique program.

The Escrow Program is a patent pending proprietary process. We will not delve into every aspect the Priorit Service Group employs in undertaking its program. However, in an effort to aid those interested individuals in understanding the legal, tax and technical aspects of the process, we will provide some of the "authority" for our program. That authority finds its basis in the little known Internal Revenue Code Section 351-transfer process, which is a much-preferred alternative to the cumbersome and limited 1031 exchange.

The 351-transfer process allows homeowners and real estate investors to defer (and possible eliminate) the tax liability on the sale of real estate and/or commercial property (property) by reinvesting the gain. By using the 351 strategy employed by Priority Services Group, the money received from a sale of property does not necessarily need to be reinvested in real estate (a requirement in 1031 exchanges), and unlike 1031 exchanges, the transferring party (owner of the property) will (without a penalty) have an unlimited amount of time to reinvest the proceeds from the sale of the property.

In a nutshell, in the 351-transfer (exchange) process, a property owner transfers his/her property to a C-Corporation in exchange for the stock of that corporation. When accomplished, the "basis" in the property exchanged for the stock becomes the "value" of the stock received in exchange for the property.

To begin with, we should first address the most fundamental basis regarding the program. That basis is 2 fold. The first is that the government WILL assist people interested in venturing into business for themselves by allowing them to utilize previously owned assets to "fund" their new business venture (the IRC calls this a capital contribution). The second is that the "Code" states categorically that in order for a transfer of real estate to a corporation be tax free, there MUST be a verifiable business reason for the transfer. The majority of our clients transfer property to a corporation in order to provide a source of funding (by selling the property) for that corporation to undertake the business of buying, holding, renting and selling real estate.

IRC Code §351 Transfers-Non-recognition Of Gain Or Loss: "No gain or loss shall be recognized if property is transferred to a corporation by one or more persons solely in exchange for stock in such corporation and immediately after the exchange such person or persons are in control of the corporation. According to Reg. §1.351-1(a)(1), the phrase "immediately after the exchange" does not necessarily require simultaneous exchanges, as long as the transfers are made pursuant to a predetermined agreement. Under §351, shareholder(s) control the corporation if, immediately after the transfer, they own at least: (1) 80% of the combined voting power of all outstanding voting stock, and (2) 80% of the shares of all classes of corporation stock.

To understand more fully what corporation capital contributions are and why the Priority Service Group draws so heavily upon this premise, it is important to delve deeper into what has already been stated and how this might benefit Priority Service Group's clients.

In 1997, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case of Peracchi vs Commissioner. Here is what the court said regarding capital contributions:

The Code tries to make organizing a corporation pain-free from a tax point of view. A capital contribution is, in tax lingo, a "non-recognition" event: A shareholder can generally contribute capital without recognizing gain on the exchange. It's merely a change in the form of ownership, like moving a billfold from one pocket to another [See I.R.C. S 351], so long as the shareholders contributing the property remain in control of the corporation after the exchange, section 351 applies: and,

Corporations may be funded with any kind of asset, such as equipment, real estate, intellectual property, contracts, leaseholds, securities or letters of credit. The tax consequences can get a little complicated because a shareholder's basis in the property contributed often differs from its fair market value. The general rule is that an asset's basis is equal to its "cost" [See I.R.C. S 1012].

The fact that gain is deferred rather than extinguished doesn't diminish the importance of questions relating to basis and the timing of recognition. In tax, as in comedy, timing matters. Most taxpayers would much prefer to pay tax on contributed property years later--when they sell their stock--rather than when they contribute the property (if he ever does, this emphasis is mine).

Now I think it prudent to address the central issue relating to the transfer of real estate that is subject to a mortgage. This single issue relating to transfers subject to liabilities is the most important issue to understand. We will first look to the United States Code Title 26 regarding Section 357 (a), Assumption of Liabilities: Again, we turn to the 1997, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case of Peracchi vs Commissioner to address this issue. Here is what the court said regarding the Assumption of Liabilities:

The property Peracchi contributed to NAC (NAC was Peracchi's corporation- emphasis mine) was encumbered by liabilities. Contribution of leveraged property makes things trickier from a tax perspective. When a shareholder contributes property encumbered by debt, the corporation usually assumes the debt. And the Code normally treats discharging a liability the same as receiving money: The taxpayer improves his economic position by the same amount either way [See I.R.C. S 61(a)(12)}. NAC's assumption of the liabilities attached to Peracchi's property therefore could theoretically be viewed as the receipt of money, which would be taxable boot [See United States v. Hendler, 303 U.S. 564 (1938)].

The Code takes a different tack. Requiring shareholders like Peracchi to recognize gain any time a corporation assumes a liability in connection with a capital contribution would greatly diminish the non-recognition benefit section 351 is meant to confer. Section 357(a) thus takes a lenient view of the assumption of liability: A shareholder engaging in a section 351 transaction does not have to treat the assumption of liability as boot, even if the corporation assumes his obligation to pay [See I.R.C. S 357(a)].

Reading on, the court held that: But what if, as the IRS fears, NAC goes bankrupt, the note will be an asset of the estate enforceable for the benefit of creditors, and Peracchi will eventually be forced to pay in after tax dollars. Peracchi will undoubtedly have worked the deferral mechanism of section 351 to his advantage, but this is not inappropriate where the taxpayer is on the hook in both form and substance for enough cash to offset the excess of liabilities over basis. By increasing his personal exposure to the creditors of NAC, Peracchi has increased his economic investment in the corporation, and a corresponding increase in basis is wholly justified.

In the Escrow Program process, the "note" is the mortgage and the liability to pay that mortgage remains (by contract) solely with the transferring party, even though by the terms of that same contract, the corporation can continue to build its equity and income by paying the expenses associated with the real estate that was transferred.

However, the corporation is not the final place a creditor would look to for payment should the corporation not pay the expenses related to the real estate or should the corporation file for bankruptcy. Instead, a creditor would look solely to the transferring party for payment of the mortgage. Therefore, until the transferred property is sold, the transferring party has a substantial economic investment in the property (amounting to the note (mortgage) discussed above) and therefore would be entitled to a fully tax free exchange.

The Taxes most Real Estate Investors don't think apply to them

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:36:00 +0000

THE TAXES THAT MOST REAL ESTATE INVESTORS THINK DON'T THINK APPLY TO THEM

In this edition, we will discuss Self-Employment and Alternative Minimum Taxes.

Sadly, we live in a whole new world of taxes and restriction. In 2005, I attended a conference for CPAs and other tax professionals that was hosted by the IRS. At that conference, the IRS official conducting the meeting was asked specifically about self-employment taxes as it applies to real estate investing. The official was noticeable amused when he said that self-employment taxes have been in the code forever but up to 2005 the IRS didn't actively enforce the tax. Then he went on to say that starting in 2005-2006, the IRS would start actively enforcing the taxability of this tax. He said that the IRS tracks all real estate transactions and that in a year or two they would be auditing and penalizing those investors who failed to file and pay the tax in the year it was due. (OUCH!)

WHAT ARE SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES?

Self-employment taxes (SE tax) are a social security and Medicare tax primarily for individuals who work for themselves. It is similar to the social security and Medicare taxes withheld from the pay of most wage earners. You figure SE tax using Schedule SE (Form 1040). (See IRS Code Section 1402 and/or IRS Publication 533).

IRS PUBLICATION 533 STATES THAT YOU ARE SELF-EMPLOYED AND MUST PAY SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY TO YOU:

You Carry On A Trade Or Business: A trade or business is generally an activity carried on for a livelihood or in good faith to make a profit. The regularity of activities and transactions and the production of income are important elements. You do not need to actually make a profit to be in a trade or business as long as you have a demonstratable profit motive. You do need, however, to make ongoing efforts to further the interests of your business.

You Are A Sole Proprietor. You are a sole proprietor if you own an unincorporated business by yourself or owned by a husband and wife.
You Are An Independent Contractor. People who are in an independent trade, business, or profession in which they offer their services are generally independent contractors.
You Are A Partner. If you are self-employed as a managing partner in a partnership or managing member in an LLC.

Husband And Wife Partners. You and your spouse may operate a business as a partnership. If you and your spouse operate a business as partners, you will report business income and expenses on form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, and attach separate Schedules K-1 showing each partner's share of the earnings. Each spouse must report his or her share of a general partnership earnings on Form 1040 and file a separate Schedule SE (Form 1040) to report SE tax. Worse yet,, if your spouse is your employee, not your partner, you must withhold and pay social security and Medicare taxes for him or her instead.

OTHER NOTEWORTHY CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING SELF EMPLOYMENT TAXES REAL ESTATE RENT:

Rental income from real estate is NOT included in earnings subject to SE tax UNLESS either of the following applies to you.

(a). You provide services for your tenants: You personally manage your properties.

(b). You are a real estate dealer.

AS YOU CAN SEE, SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES APPLY TO MOST OF US

WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX?

Remember back to when you were young and poor and nothing made you madder than tales of rich people who paid nothing in income taxes? Well, you weren't alone, and that anger led to the creation of something called the alternative minimum tax, which was designed to keep the rich from living tax-free.

Fast-forward a few years. You're a bit older, somewhat better off and paying far more in taxes than you ever thought possible. So what's the last thing you expect to see when you fill out your tax return? That you owe the alternative minimum tax. You can take some solace in the fact that thousands of taxpayers just like you have been snagged by this nasty bit of tax law in recent years. While only 19,000 people owed the AMT in 1970, over 4 million are paying it now.

What happened? Inflation, mostly. While the "regular" tax brackets, exemptions and standard deductions are adjusted annually for inflation, the AMT brackets and exemptions are not, so many people whose income has grown with the economy enter the dreaded AMT zone each year. Especially vulnerable are people with income over $75,000 and some large deductions, but not the exotic ones that were originally targeted by the AMT's creators. Most vulnerable are taxpayers with several children, interest deductions from second mortgages, capital gains, high state and local taxes, and incentive stock options.

How The Tax Works: The best way to understand the AMT is to view it as a separate tax system. It has its own set of rates and its own rules for deductions, which usually are less generous than the regular rules. Because of these confusing rules, the only ways you can tell if you owe the tax are by filling out the forms (essentially doing your taxes a second time) or by being audited by the Internal Revenue Service. If it turns out you should have paid the AMT but didn't, you will owe the back taxes plus any interest or penalty that the IRS decides to dole out.

You should definitely run the numbers if your gross income is above $75,000 and you have write-offs for personal exemptions, taxes and home-equity loan interest. Ditto if you exercised incentive stock options during the year, or if you own rental properties, partnership (or LLC) interests or S corporation stock or If you earn more than $100,000.

That means filling out Form 6251. In effect, you are simply adding back some tax deductions and income exclusions to your regular taxable income to arrive at your alternative minimum taxable income. Here is where the middle class gets soaked. First you have to add back your personal- and dependent-exemption deductions ($3,200 each in 2005, $3,300 each in 2006), then your standard deduction if you don't itemize ($10,000 for joint filers in 2005 and $10,300 for joint filers in 2006; $5,000 for singles in 2005 and $5,150 for singles in 2006). You also lose your state, local and foreign income and property-tax write-offs, as well as your home-equity loan interest, if the loan proceeds are not used for home improvements.

The AMT also ignores some itemized deductions, such as investment expenses and employee business expenses, and some medical and dental expenses. Under the regular rules, you wouldn't pay current taxes on that amount, but under the AMT, it's considered income.

The AMT reporting form has quite a few other pluses and minuses, but you can probably ignore them unless you own a business, rental properties or interests in partnerships (or LLCs) or S corps. If you do, you may need a tax pro to prepare at least the Form 6251 part of your return.

Finally, you get to deduct the AMT exemption - $58,000 for joint filers; $40,250 for unmarried persons; $29,000 for those married filing separately. However, this exemption is reduced by 25 cents for each dollar of AMT taxable income above $150,000 for couples ($112,500 for singles and $75,000 for married filing separate status), and it's not adjusted for inflation, which is one reason why more people owe the AMT every year. (The exemption amounts for 2006 are not yet finalized, but we expect them to remain the same.)

After the exemption (if any) has been deducted, the result is subject to AMT rates - 26% on the first $175,000 ($87,500 for married couples filing separately) and 28% on the excess. Again, the AMT brackets are not adjusted for inflation, which causes much greater exposure to the tax as the years go by. If the AMT exceeds your regular tax, you have to pay the greater amount. Technically, the AMT is just the liability over and above the regular tax, and this figure is entered on line 45 on page 2 of Form 1040.

IMPORTANT NOTE: When you read this brief regarding the AMT, did you notice that you and every entity was listed as being subject to this disastrous tax EXCEPT the "C" corporation? In actuality there is a corporate AMT but it only applies should your C-Corp earn in excess of 7.5 million dollars over a three-year period. In other words for most of us, there is no reason to worry about this tax applying to our C-Corp business.

CONFUSED YET? MOST PEOPLE ARE BY THIS POINT. BUT NOT TO WORRY, OUR ESCROW PROGRAM WILL LEGALLY ELIMINATE BOTH OF THESE TAXES ALL TOGETHER.

Defer capital gains? We'll Show you how!

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:03:00 +0000

HOW THE ESCROW PROGRAM WORKS

In this edition we will discuss How the Escrow Program works.

The Escrow Program is unique in that it provides each program participant with a FREE Nevada corporation (valued at over $3,000.00) and transfers the participant's property into the name of that corporation. Then when the property is sold, the corporation sells it not the program participant.

THE CORPORATION INCLUDES:

* NV Secretary of State articles of incorporation
* NV Secretary of State initial list of officers
* NV Secretary of State incorporation expedite service (if needed)
* Corporation records book
* Corporation IRS EIN number
* Corporate compliance CD (includes manuals, minutes & contracts)
* Corporation address in Nevada for first year
* Bank introduction to Wells Fargo Bank in Nevada for the required corporate bank account

By selling a property titled in the name of this corporation, the program participants eliminate state and self-employment taxes immediately (See the overview on this in this Proposal or IRS Code Section 1402 and/or IRS Publication 533). In addition, the corporation pays no capital gains tax because it is IN the real estate business and the income derived from the sale is considered "ordinary income" to the corporation (The authority for this can be found by reviewing the information concerning Ordinary Or Capital Gain Or Loss in IRS Publication 544, also see the overview on this in this Proposal). Additionally, the federal taxes can be written down to almost nothing because of the many "write offs" that are available to the C-Corporation but not to an individual, an LLC or even an S-Corporation (The authority for this can be found by reviewing the information concerning Business Expenses in IRS Publication 535, also see the overview on this in this Proposal).

NOTE: Should the corporation not be able to totally eliminate its taxable income the corporation would be required to pay taxes ONLY on the NET amount remaining in the company at the end of the tax year (if any). At the end of the year, should the corporation not "spend" all its income and providing the remaining NET taxable amount did NOT exceed $50,000, the corporation would be taxed at 15%. As the program participant can plainly see, this is a far cry from the taxability that the program participant would endure if the property were sold in the name of the program participant or through a "pass-through entity" such as an LLC or "S"-Corporation.

To facilitate a smooth transaction, the program participant and CGR will enter into an agreement wherein the program participant will retain the total amount of the proceeds derived from the sale of the property less the flat fee that "CGR" will receive for providing its services.

NOTE: It is important to understand that the fee that "CGR" charges will not be paid out of the program participant's "profits" from the sale of the program participant property or from the program participant. "CGR" fees are derived from the "savings" that "CGR" will help the program participant realize and are paid directly out of the escrow.

LASTLY, simultaneously with "CGR" being paid its fee from the escrow, "CGR" will transfer the corporation records book, original corporate documentation, and all of the corporate stock to the program participant without further cost.

All in all, it is expected that the program participant should be able to retain at least 45% more of the money that the program participant would have realized from the sale had it been sold in the program participant personal name, the name of an LLC or even if the property was sold in the name of an S-Corporation.

Real Estate Dealer Status

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:52:00 +0000

THE IRS REAL ESTATE DEALER STATUS ISSUE

In this edition we will discuss the IRS Real Estate Dealer Status Issue.

Real Estate Dealer Status: The Internal Revenue Code defines a real estate dealer as: "An individual who is engaged in the business of selling real estate with a view to the gains and profits that may be derived from such sales. On the other hand, an individual who merely holds real estate for investment or speculation and receives rentals therefrom is not considered a real estate dealer."

Generally, a person is considered a real estate dealer if he/she has the intent of reselling rather than investment or more specifically if (1) the property is held primarily for sale; (2) the property is held for sale to customers; and (3) the property is for sale in the ordinary course of the taxpayer's trade or business (See, e.g., Winthrop, Ada Belle v. Tomlinson, 417 F.2d 905).

The determination whether your real estate activities rise to the level of a trade or business is a factual one, subject to a number of tests including the nature and purpose of the acquisition of the property, the duration of ownership, the continuity of sales and sales related activities over a period of time, the volume and frequency of sales, the extent of development or improvement on the property, the extent of soliciting customers and advertising, and the substantially of sales compared with other sources of your income.

Over the past five years we have seen an unprecedented appreciation in real estate values and a surge in real estate activity by investors seeking to capitalize on gains that have outpaced the stock market. This has brought to the forefront the issue of whether a sale of real estate would be treated as ordinary income or capital gains. Most people who bought real estate to "flip" it down the road would expect to pay only capital gains, and if they held it for more than one year, to pay only a 15% personal income tax. Furthermore, they would assume that they would have the option of doing a tax-deferred 1031 exchange or an installment sale. However, an active buyer and seller of real estate may be labeled as a "real estate dealer", which not only leads to negative tax consequences, but also severely restricts flexibility in structuring real estate transactions.

IN SHORT, if a substantial portion of your personal gross sales or net income were derived from real estate sales, then you most assuredly would be considered a real estate dealer.

NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THE DEALER STATUS

NO 1031 Exchanges:If you are considered a real estate dealer by the IRS, you become ineligible for Section 1031 tax deferred exchanges because the property owned is considered inventory.

Ordinary Income Tax Rates: Classification as a real estate dealer would subject the gain on the property to ordinary income tax rates, which cap out at 35%. Given that long-term capital gains are taxed at 15%, the affect on potential profit margins is quite significant. The use of a corporation will eliminate the self-employment tax for real estate dealers.

Self-Employment Tax: In addition to ordinary income tax rates, a real estate dealer's gain from sale of real estate IS subject to self-employment tax, which currently 15.3%. The use of a corporation will eliminate the self-employment tax for real estate dealers.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The Real Estate Dealer status would NOT apply to you if you operate your real estate business through a corporation like the one provided by Priority Services Group.

1031 Obsolete?!

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:54:00 +0000

THE ESCROW PROGRAM IS A SUPERIOR VEHICLE
FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTING WHEN COMPARED TO THE OUT DATED 1031 EXCHANGE

In this edition, we will discuss why the Escrow Program has rendered real estate 1031 exchanges obsolete.

1031 Exchange History: In the summer of 1990, the I.R.S. laid out in detail the procedure for turning a sale and purchase type transaction into an exchange that came to be know as a 1031 Exchange. These new rules allowed owners of certain types of like kind Real and Personal property to sell their property and buy other like kind property without immediately paying the Capital Gains Tax.

The IRS Classification Of Real Estate For 1031 Exchanges: The classification of properties to be exchanged determines if the property qualifies for Section 1031 treatment. The last two types of property shown below qualify for Section 1031-tax deferral, but the first one doesn't.

• Property held primarily for sale. ("Flipping" Property)
• Property held for productive use in a trade or business. (Business Property)
• Property held for investment. (Rental Property)

The Role Of The Qualified Intermediary:

The role of the Qualified Intermediary is essential to completing a successful exchange. The Qualified Intermediary is the glue that puts the buyer and seller of property together into the form of a 1031 Exchange.

In order to take advantage of the qualified intermediary "safe harbor" there must be a written agreement between the taxpayer and intermediary expressly limiting the taxpayer's rights to receive, pledge, borrow or otherwise obtain the benefits of the money or property held by the intermediary.

A qualified intermediary is formally defined as a person who is not the taxpayer and, as required by the exchange agreement, acquires the relinquished property from the taxpayer, transfers the relinquished property, acquires the replacement property, and transfers the replacement property to the taxpayer.

THE DISADVANTAGES OF A SECTION 1031 EXCHANGE

Future Tax Basis: The tax basis of replacement property is essentially the purchase price of the replacement property minus the gain, which was deferred on the sale of the relinquished property in the exchange. Thus, the replacement property includes a deferred gain that will be taxed in the future if the taxpayer cashes out of his investment.

Property, Which Does Not Qualify For A 1031 Exchange, Include: Please note that all of the types of property listed below are what creates the IRS designation of a "dealer" with the single exception of the personal residence.

• A personal residence
• Land under development for resale ("Flipping" Property - IRS Dealer Status)
• Construction or fix/flips for resale ("Flipping" Property - IRS Dealer Status)
• Property purchased for resale ("Flipping" Property-IRS Dealer Status)
• Inventory property ("Flipping" Property - IRS Dealer Status)

Replacement Property Title Must Be Taken In The Same Names As The Relinquished Property Was Titled: If a husband and wife own property in joint tenancy or as tenants in common, the replacement property must be deeded to both spouses, either as joint tenants or as tenants in common.

THE RULES OF "BOOT" IN A SECTION 1031 EXCHANGE

A Taxpayer Must NOT Receive "Boot" from an exchange in order for a Section 1031 exchange to be completely tax-free. Any "boot" received is taxable.

The Term "Boot" is not used in the Internal Revenue Code but is commonly used in discussing the tax consequences of a Section 1031 tax-deferred exchange. "Boot" is the money or the fair market value of "other property" received by the taxpayer in an exchange. Money includes all cash equivalents plus liabilities of the taxpayer assumed by the other party, or liabilities to which the property exchanged by the taxpayer is subject to. "Other property" is property that is non-like-kind, such as personal property received in an exchange of real property, property used for personal purposes. "Other property" also includes such things as a promissory note received from a buyer (Commonly used in Seller Financing situations).

THERE YOU HAVE IT: The exchange process can get complicated and has many tax traps should you violate ANY of the rules governing the 1031 Exchange process that is so popular with real estate investors today. Now let's compare what we have just learned about the 1031 Exchange process to the Escrow Program.

THE Escrow Program

The Escrow Program is NOT a deferral of the capital gains taxes you owe on the sale of each property you sell/exchange until a future date when the taxman WILL surely exact his due. It is the ELIMINATION of the capital gains taxes you would otherwise owe on the sale of each property you sell. There is a major difference between defer and eliminate. To Defer means to wait or postpone an action, such as a payment, until a later date while to Eliminate means Remove or to get rid of. Which one makes more sense to you?

Additionally, 1031 exchanges don't take into consideration the other taxes that you would be obliged to pay such as self-employment taxes or state taxes when you sell a property. These too, are totally ELIMINATED by the Escrow Program.

The authority for the Escrow Program can be found in Section 351 and several other places in the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, because we employ a corporation (that is in the real estate business) as the entity selling the property, all of the income received in the escrow can be classified as "ordinary business income" under the IRS Code rules.

Thus the money you receive from the sale can be spent on ANYTHING that could be classified as ordinary and/or necessary for the operation of your real estate business. This includes things like employee benefit plans (for you), vehicles, health insurance, retirement plans, travel and even to buy more real estate.

Further, under 1031 rules, should you take money from the sale/exchange of a property to pay for these "ordinary business expenses" you would be required to pay taxes on the gross amount you took to pay for these items (in AFTER TAX dollars). This is not the case with the Escrow Program. In CGR Plan, you use BEFORE TAX dollars to pay for these items and pay taxes ONLY on the money left over at the end of the year.
With the Escrow Program you will find no restrictions such as "like-kind" or types of property that won't qualify. Additionally, the Escrow Program will ELIMINATE all IRS dealer status issues as well.

Lastly, 1031 exchanges will NOT provide any asset protection from predatory attorneys. However, the Escrow Program WILL.

SO, IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THIS FINAL NOTE: Use a 1031 exchange and defer your taxes until they move you into the highest tax bracket so you can pay the maximum in taxes OR use the Escrow Program and ELIMINATE the capital gains, self-employment and state income taxes right from the get go.

WITH ALL THINGS BEING CONSIDERED, I THINK YOU WILL AGREE THAT THE ESCROW PROGRAM IS SUPERIOR TO 1031 EXCHANGES.

Why is everyone recommending a corporation for Real Estate investing?

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:41:00 +0000

In this edition, we will discuss the basic differences between a "C"-Corp, an LLC and the "S" Corp.

We continue to hear attorneys and CPAs as well as other allegedly "knowledgeable authorities" frivolously recommend the use of an LLC or Subchapter S corporations for real estate investing, when in many cases, that ends up costing their naive clients a lot more in tax dollars. For that reason, it's time for another refresher on some of the big differences between C corporations and S corporations as well as LLCs. Here are some of the more important considerations you should ponder when evaluating which entity will suit your individual situation best.

Tax Brackets: With our country's "progressive" tax rate structure, it is very expensive to have too much income on your personal tax return. For individuals, the nominal rates go from 10% to 38.6% with actual effective rates much higher due to the phasing out of so many tax breaks as income increases.

With an S corp or LLC, all of the income flows right onto the 1040 tax return of the shareholders (members in an LLC), pushing them up into higher tax brackets. On the other hand, a C corporation has its own tax structure, ranging from 15% on the first $50,000 of NET income, to as much as 39%.

Income Taxed: With an S Corporation (or LLC), the shareholders (members in the LLC) are required to pay income tax on their share of the entity's income whether they take any money out of the entity's account or leave it there.

Phantom Income: "C" Corporations can accumulate earnings and pay taxes at the corporate level without the shareholders being individually taxed. On the other hand, if an S Corporation or LLC were to attempt to accumulate earnings, the shareholders or members of the LLC could be subject to " Phantom Income" and therefore be taxed on income not actually received. The " Phantom Income " issue is a simple concept. "Phantom Income" arises where the shareholder or member receives taxable income but no actual money (OUCH!).

Tax Savings: "C"-Corporations are entitled by law to take many tax deductions that are not available to individuals, "S"-Corporations or Limited Liability Companies (LLCs). In addition, "C" corporations have a lower federal tax rate at all levels of income up to $250,000, compared with individuals (only "pass through" entities such as LLCs and "S"-corporations pass the taxable income or losses directly to you). A corporation pays only 15% tax on the first $50,000 dollars of PROFIT (the amount of money left over after all expenses are paid).

More Deductions: IRS Section 179 expensing election is much more lucrative for owners of C corporations because they can literally multiply their total deduction by splitting their purchases of business assets among their different business entities. With an S corp or LLC, the Section 179 deduction is limited to just the one amount. Likewise, the deduction for net rental losses is magnified by using a C corp because it can use rental losses to offset all operating income. This is not the case for S corps as rental losses are subject to the 25% restrictive passive loss rules.

Employee Benefits: One of the benefits of a corporation is having it provide lucrative employee benefits that are deductible by the corp and tax free to the employees. Medical, life insurance, education, childcare, and retirement plans are just a few of the types of benefits available. The tax-free status of some of these plans is much less generous for people owning more than 2% of S corporation stock or an LLC membership than it is for the shareholders and/or employees in a C corp.

Double Taxation: Tax planners continue to spread fear concerning the potential for double taxation with C-corporations. Double taxation comes into play where after-tax earnings of a C corp are distributed to shareholders as non-deductible dividends. This is rarely a problem in small corporations (with earnings under 5 million) and/or non-publicly traded corporations because there are so many legitimate ways to pull money out of the C corp in a manner that is deductible, and thus only taxed once. Some of these are:

Compensation Plans
Interest Payments (includes for loans you might make to your entity)
Lease Payments (includes vehicles, equipment, planes and real estate)
Contributions to Retirement Plans
Benefit Plans (including Life and Health Insurance)
Non-Taxable Reimbursements To You for personal funds you expended on behalf of your entity.

Attack On the Rich: "Mean Testing" (penalizing the evil rich) is a growing trend in this country, and is most often measured by the adjusted gross income (AGI) on your 1040. People over certain income thresholds lose tax breaks and have to pay more taxes and penalties than others do. Income from an S corp or LLC will just make things worse. This is not the case with a C corp.

When it comes to the use of an LLC or "S"-Corp, an old Wendy's commercial said it best:

"WHERE'S THE BEEF"?

Welcome to Priority Services Group, LLC

noreply@blogger.com (Priority Services Group) — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:38:00 +0000

For over 27 years Priority Services Group, LLC has been helping people and businesses legally increase their profitability, maximize their asset protection, limit their personal liability and successfully reduce their state and federal taxes. Inside this blog you will find a wealth of information on how Corporations, LLC's, Trusts, and Estate Plans can help you on your way to achieving financial freedom by reducing liability, maximizing asset protection, and preserving your privacy!