<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Protect Marriage Equality</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com</link>
	<description>Resources, analysis and news about marriage equality</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ProtectMarriageEquality" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>ProtectMarriageEquality</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Hiatus</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/PFe6HmeVOus/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/29/hiatus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1031</guid>
		<description>ProtectMarriageEquality.com is on indefinite hiatus. The archives remain available for searching.
For up-to-date information and analysis, please consult the following blogs and websites:

Beyond Homophobia
Box Turtle Bulletin
California Gay Marriage Blog
California Ripple Effect
Ex-Gay Watch
Family Equality Council Blog
Gay News Blog
Leonard Link
Pam’s House Blend
Straight Talk On Marriage
To Form A More Perfect Union
We The People&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=PFe6HmeVOus:jHUs0-qCPeI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=PFe6HmeVOus:jHUs0-qCPeI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=PFe6HmeVOus:jHUs0-qCPeI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/PFe6HmeVOus" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/29/hiatus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/29/hiatus/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis: The Psychological Harm Of Anti-Gay Ballot Campaigns</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/UepYUGSjOew/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/28/analysis-the-psychological-harm-of-anti-gay-ballot-campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis, Strategy, Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CA Proposition 8 Campaign & Aftermath]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Campaigns, Initiatives & Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prof. Gregory Herek]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sharon Scales Rostosky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1028</guid>
		<description>If you were touched by the campaigns in California, Arizona, Florida, or Arkansas, and if you&amp;#8217;ve been experiencing post-election psychological distress &amp;#8212; whether it takes the form of anger, sadness, irritability, feelings of betrayal, revenge fantasies, sleep difficulties, or something else &amp;#8212; the research suggests you&amp;#8217;re not alone. What you&amp;#8217;re feeling these days is a [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=UepYUGSjOew:waKSmu68x2w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=UepYUGSjOew:waKSmu68x2w:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=UepYUGSjOew:waKSmu68x2w:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/UepYUGSjOew" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/28/analysis-the-psychological-harm-of-anti-gay-ballot-campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/28/analysis-the-psychological-harm-of-anti-gay-ballot-campaigns/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>CA: Gay Rights Leaders Plan To Defend Judges Who Back Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/kYHC0kAHHXY/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/27/ca-gay-rights-leaders-plan-to-defend-judges-who-back-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis, Strategy, Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CA Proposition 8 Campaign & Aftermath]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Candidates & Politicians  & Elected Officials]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Equality Supporters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law, Policy & Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CA Supreme Court]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geoff Kors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1030</guid>
		<description>Gay rights leaders hope to build a $1-million war chest to defend any judge threatened with recall for ruling in favor of gay marriage, leaders announced during a conference call with supporters Tuesday night.
Leaders of the failed campaign to oppose Proposition 8, which amended the state Constitution to define marriage as only between a man [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=kYHC0kAHHXY:l-08K-scQbk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=kYHC0kAHHXY:l-08K-scQbk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=kYHC0kAHHXY:l-08K-scQbk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/kYHC0kAHHXY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/27/ca-gay-rights-leaders-plan-to-defend-judges-who-back-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/27/ca-gay-rights-leaders-plan-to-defend-judges-who-back-marriage-equality/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>IA: Marriage Equality Ban Goes Before State High Court</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/n8eP7oaVgFs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/27/ia-marriage-equality-ban-goes-before-state-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Law, Policy & Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Court cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Supreme Court]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law Policy & Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1029</guid>
		<description>The debate over the future of Iowa&amp;#8217;s Defense of Marriage Act, a decade-old law that defines marriage as being between a man and a woman, comes after a ruling by a lower court judge last year&amp;#8230;.
Given that two state Supreme Courts are likely to weigh in on the subject next year, and that many state [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=n8eP7oaVgFs:IeQW1iuKU3g:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=n8eP7oaVgFs:IeQW1iuKU3g:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=n8eP7oaVgFs:IeQW1iuKU3g:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/n8eP7oaVgFs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/27/ia-marriage-equality-ban-goes-before-state-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/27/ia-marriage-equality-ban-goes-before-state-high-court/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Editorial: California’s Legal Tangle</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/bRus-t0epwk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/editorial-californias-legal-tangle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[CA Proposition 8 Campaign & Aftermath]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commentary, Editorial, Opinion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CA Supreme Court]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commentary Editorial Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1026</guid>
		<description>The approval of Proposition 8 in California, a constitutional change designed to prohibit marriage between couples of the same sex, was not just a defeat for fairness. It raised serious legal questions about the validity of using the Election Day initiative process to obliterate an existing right for a targeted minority&amp;#8230;.
The court has correctly determined [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=bRus-t0epwk:wsx4D085SJc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=bRus-t0epwk:wsx4D085SJc:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=bRus-t0epwk:wsx4D085SJc:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/bRus-t0epwk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/editorial-californias-legal-tangle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/editorial-californias-legal-tangle/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Senate Backs Gay Relationship Rights</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/MzZO9iaQj3Q/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/australian-senate-backs-gay-relationship-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Unions & Domestic Partnerships]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law, Policy & Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Australia Labor Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1025</guid>
		<description>Australian lawmakers have approved legislation giving homosexual couples the same rights as heterosexuals but have ruled out legalizing same-sex marriages.
The Senate passed amendments late Monday to around 100 family, health and taxation laws that give homosexual couples access to the same services as opposite-sex couples living together in &amp;#8220;de facto,&amp;#8221; or common-law, relationships.
Among the major [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=MzZO9iaQj3Q:WpCE0XWxUTA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=MzZO9iaQj3Q:WpCE0XWxUTA:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=MzZO9iaQj3Q:WpCE0XWxUTA:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/MzZO9iaQj3Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/australian-senate-backs-gay-relationship-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/australian-senate-backs-gay-relationship-rights/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>CA: State To Probe Mormon Church Role In Prop. 8 Campaign</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/sy8uuhyS-FY/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/ca-state-to-probe-mormon-church-role-in-prop-8-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[CA Proposition 8 Campaign & Aftermath]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Campaigns, Initiatives & Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Religion, Congregations & Denominations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Californians Against Hate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mormons & Mormon Church (LDS)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political donations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1027</guid>
		<description>California&amp;#8217;s political watchdog agency is investigating a complaint alleging the Mormon church failed to report non-monetary contributions to the Yes on 8 campaign, a state official said Monday.
The sworn complaint by a group called Californians Against Hate contends the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints organized phone banks from Utah and Idaho and sent [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=sy8uuhyS-FY:-Mftf47oRM4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=sy8uuhyS-FY:-Mftf47oRM4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=sy8uuhyS-FY:-Mftf47oRM4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/sy8uuhyS-FY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/ca-state-to-probe-mormon-church-role-in-prop-8-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/ca-state-to-probe-mormon-church-role-in-prop-8-campaign/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>IA: Nearly 60%  Of Iowans Support Marriage Equality Or civil Unions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/FTVCi0TZ_mo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/ia-nearly-60-of-iowans-support-marriage-equality-or-civil-unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Polls & Surveys]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description>Nearly 60 percent of Iowa voters support gay marriage or civil unions, according to poll results released today by the University of Iowa.
The statewide survey of 586 Iowa voters found that 28.1 percent support gay marriage, while another 30.2 percent oppose gay marriage, but support civil unions. Thirty-two percent of respondents oppose both gay marriage [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=FTVCi0TZ_mo:tXeUvUvypI4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=FTVCi0TZ_mo:tXeUvUvypI4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=FTVCi0TZ_mo:tXeUvUvypI4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/FTVCi0TZ_mo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/ia-nearly-60-of-iowans-support-marriage-equality-or-civil-unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/ia-nearly-60-of-iowans-support-marriage-equality-or-civil-unions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FL: Gay Adoption Ban Is Ruled Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/dJL7EWNFudo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/fl-gay-adoption-ban-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Law, Policy & Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Parenting & Families]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Anita Bryant]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Court cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Foster parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1023</guid>
		<description>A Florida law that has banned adoptions by gay men and lesbians for over three decades is unconstitutional, a judge here ruled on Tuesday&amp;#8230;.
A spokeswoman for the attorney general&amp;#8217;s office said the state would appeal, and the case is likely to end up before the State Supreme Court.
Florida is the only state with a law [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=dJL7EWNFudo:oYT-7hOzDsw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=dJL7EWNFudo:oYT-7hOzDsw:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=dJL7EWNFudo:oYT-7hOzDsw:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/dJL7EWNFudo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/fl-gay-adoption-ban-is-ruled-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/26/fl-gay-adoption-ban-is-ruled-unconstitutional/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Prop. 8 Groups Differ On Anti-Gay Strategy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~3/zdM9TwRalPw/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/24/pro-prop-8-groups-differ-on-anti-gay-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Equality Blogger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[CA Proposition 8 Campaign & Aftermath]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Equality Opponents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Pugno]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Court cases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Randy Thomasson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/?p=1022</guid>
		<description>The group that persuaded California voters this month to pass Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage, now is fighting its friends as well as its foes.
Other conservative groups that loudly backed Prop. 8 are being targeted as too extreme and off-putting by ProtectMarriage.com, which put the constitutional amendment on the Nov. 4 ballot and hopes [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=zdM9TwRalPw:jn9e2zbfaIQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?a=zdM9TwRalPw:jn9e2zbfaIQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProtectMarriageEquality?i=zdM9TwRalPw:jn9e2zbfaIQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProtectMarriageEquality/~4/zdM9TwRalPw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/24/pro-prop-8-groups-differ-on-anti-gay-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.protectmarriageequality.com/2008/11/24/pro-prop-8-groups-differ-on-anti-gay-strategy/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
