American Corrections: From Early Penitentiaries to the Big House Era

By Dr. Michael Beshears and Dr. Michelle Beshears

The history of American corrections reflects a continual struggle to balance punishment, rehabilitation, deterrence, and institutional control. Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, correctional philosophies evolved in response to changing social, political, and economic conditions. From the earliest penitentiaries to the emergence of the notorious “Big House” prisons, each era attempted to solve the perceived shortcomings of its predecessor. While each system introduced new methods of confinement and inmate management, many ultimately failed to achieve their stated goals, leaving a lasting influence on the development of modern correctional institutions.

One of the earliest correctional philosophies to emerge in the United States was the Separate System, also known as the Pennsylvania System or Philadelphia System. Developed in the early nineteenth century at Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia, this model was based upon the belief that solitude promoted genuine rehabilitation. Reformers believed that crime resulted from moral and spiritual failings, and that complete isolation would encourage offenders to reflect upon their actions, repent for their crimes, and ultimately reform their character.

Under the Separate System, prisoners remained in solitary confinement at all times. They lived, worked, ate, and slept alone within their individual cells and were prohibited from communicating with other inmates or members of the outside world. Even movement throughout the prison was carefully controlled to prevent prisoners from seeing one another. The silence and isolation were intended to eliminate criminal influences while fostering introspection, prayer, and personal transformation. This philosophy mirrored the secluded lives of monastic communities, where contemplation and self-examination were viewed as paths toward redemption.

Although the Separate System appealed to many reformers, it proved to be extremely expensive to operate. Constructing individual cells capable of supporting complete isolation required significant financial investment. In addition, inmate labor was largely limited to individual craft production, making the system economically inefficient. Many prisoners also suffered severe psychological consequences from prolonged isolation, including depression, anxiety, hallucinations, and mental deterioration. As these shortcomings became increasingly apparent, correctional leaders began searching for a more practical alternative.

The most influential alternative became the Congregate System, more commonly known as the Auburn System, which originated at Auburn Prison in New York. Unlike the Pennsylvania System, the Auburn model sought to combine strict discipline with productive labor. Prisoners continued to sleep alone in individual cells during the evening but were permitted to leave their cells during the day to work collectively in prison industries and eat meals together.

Despite allowing limited physical proximity among inmates, the Auburn System maintained an uncompromising rule of silence. Prisoners were forbidden to speak, make eye contact, or communicate in any manner while working or eating. Guards enforced silence through corporal punishment and severe disciplinary measures. Daily movement throughout the institution followed a military-style routine in which inmates marched in lockstep, emphasizing obedience, order, and institutional control.

Several important similarities existed between the Separate and Congregate Systems. Both relied heavily upon solitary housing during non-working hours, viewed incarceration as a means of moral reform, and imposed highly structured daily routines designed to instill discipline. Both systems also sought to eliminate criminal influences among inmates by severely restricting communication. However, the methods used to accomplish these objectives differed considerably.

The most significant distinction involved inmate labor and social interaction. Under the Separate System, prisoners remained completely isolated and performed individual craft work within their cells. Under the Congregate System, inmates worked together in prison factories performing repetitive industrial labor while remaining silent. Although communication remained prohibited, prisoners could observe one another, creating what historians have described as a society without intercourse, a prison society in which inmates shared physical space without verbal interaction.

Economic realities ultimately determined which system became dominant in the United States. During the nineteenth century, America experienced a shortage of affordable industrial labor, making inmate factory production financially attractive. The Auburn System allowed prisons to generate substantial revenue by manufacturing goods through organized prison labor. In contrast, many European nations possessed an abundant supply of inexpensive factory workers and therefore lacked the same economic incentive to rely upon prison industries. As a result, the Separate System remained considerably more influential throughout Europe than it did in the United States.

During the latter half of the nineteenth century, correctional reform entered another phase with the emergence of the Reformatory Movement. Reformatories shifted attention toward rehabilitation, particularly for youthful offenders believed capable of reform before becoming hardened criminals. The most influential institution of this era was the Elmira Reformatory, established in New York in 1876.

Elmira introduced educational programming, vocational training, military discipline, classification systems, and indeterminate sentencing. Prisoners demonstrating positive institutional behavior could earn an earlier release based on evidence of rehabilitation, rather than simply serving fixed sentences. Although these innovations represented important advances in correctional philosophy, Elmira gradually became increasingly punitive. Strict military discipline, corporal punishment, and authoritarian management practices eventually caused the institution to resemble the penitentiaries it had sought to replace.

Women’s reformatories developed during approximately the same period and reflected a substantially different correctional philosophy. Rather than emphasizing military discipline or industrial labor, women’s institutions focused upon preparing inmates for traditional domestic roles. Educational programs centered on housekeeping, cooking, sewing, child care, and other responsibilities associated with the social expectations of women during the nineteenth century.

Unlike large penitentiaries, women’s reformatories often consisted of small cottage-style residences housing approximately twenty inmates under the supervision of a female matron. Reformers believed this family-like environment encouraged moral development and personal responsibility more effectively than traditional prison cells. Despite these progressive intentions, women’s reformatories frequently excluded minority women based upon racist assumptions regarding morality and femininity, limiting access to rehabilitative opportunities.

By the beginning of the twentieth century, American corrections entered what became known as the Big House Era, which lasted from approximately 1900 through the mid-twentieth century. The term Big House became synonymous with large, centralized maximum-security prisons designed primarily to confine rather than rehabilitate offenders. Unlike earlier penitentiaries that emphasized penance or reformatories that promoted rehabilitation, Big House prisons focused overwhelmingly on custody, discipline, and institutional control.

Life inside the Big House was highly regimented, monotonous, and emotionally exhausting. Prisoners occupied small, barren cells, adhered to rigid schedules, and endured repetitive daily routines with little variation. Historians have frequently observed that while the dominant characteristic of the early penitentiary was fear, the defining characteristic of the Big House became boredom. Days blended together with little expectation of personal growth, educational opportunity, or meaningful rehabilitation.

Institutional discipline during the Big House Era was often severe. Minor rule violations could result in solitary confinement, loss of privileges, physical punishment, or extended periods of isolation. Correctional administrators viewed strict discipline as essential for maintaining order within increasingly overcrowded institutions. The emphasis on punishment frequently overshadowed any meaningful efforts toward offender rehabilitation.

Although Big House prisons existed throughout the United States, significant regional differences emerged. Northern institutions generally resembled traditional industrial penitentiaries characterized by massive stone buildings, centralized cellblocks, and factory labor. Southern prisons, particularly those in states such as Texas, frequently operated more like agricultural plantations or prison farms. Inmates, many of whom were African American, worked in chain gangs under armed, horseback-mounted guards performing agricultural labor, road construction, and other physically demanding tasks.

Race profoundly influenced correctional experiences during the Big House Era. Segregation policies divided prison populations along racial lines, forcing minority inmates to establish their own informal social structures for protection and survival. African American prisoners frequently experienced unequal treatment, fewer opportunities, harsher working conditions, and limited access to institutional resources. For many years, the experiences of minority prisoners received little attention from correctional administrators or academic researchers.

Women also encountered unique hardships during this period. Initially, female prisoners were housed within segregated sections of male institutions where they often experienced neglect, exploitation, physical abuse, and sexual victimization. As the female prison population gradually increased, separate women’s institutions emerged. However, these facilities frequently adopted correctional models originally designed for men and were often administered by male personnel. Consequently, women’s correctional needs remained largely overlooked throughout much of the twentieth century.

Comparing the Big House Era with earlier correctional models reveals several important distinctions. The earliest penitentiaries focused upon spiritual reflection and moral transformation through isolation. Reformatories emphasized education, vocational training, and behavioral improvement, particularly for youthful offenders. In contrast, the Big House largely abandoned rehabilitation in favor of custody, discipline, and institutional security. The objective shifted from changing offenders to simply managing them.

The evolution of American corrections demonstrates that correctional philosophy continually reflects broader societal beliefs regarding crime, punishment, labor, rehabilitation, and social control. Economic conditions, political priorities, racial attitudes, and evolving theories of criminal behavior have each shaped the design and operation of correctional institutions throughout history. While modern correctional systems have moved beyond many practices associated with the Separate System, the Auburn System, and the Big House Era, contemporary debates over rehabilitation, prison labor, solitary confinement, institutional security, and offender reentry continue to reflect lessons from these historical models.

Understanding the development of American corrections provides valuable insight into current correctional practices and future reform efforts. The progression from solitary confinement to industrial labor, from reformatories to maximum-security institutions, illustrates the ongoing challenge of balancing punishment with rehabilitation while protecting both institutional security and public safety. As correctional philosophy continues to evolve, the successes and failures of these historical systems remain essential for informing evidence-based correctional policy and practice.

About the Author: Dr. Michael L. Beshears is a retired United States Army Master Sergeant, university professor, published author, husband, father, and grandfather. He holds a Ph.D. in Business Administration with a specialization in Criminal Justice from Northcentral University; a Master of Science in Criminology from Indiana State University; a Master of Arts in Health Services Management from Webster University; and additional graduate coursework in Public Administration. With decades of experience in higher education, law enforcement, military leadership, and criminal justice, Dr. Beshears has taught thousands of students and authored academic publications in criminology, law, and criminal justice. He lives in Clarkridge, Arkansas, with his wife, Dr. Michelle Beshears, and their family.

About the Author: Dr. Michelle Beshears holds bachelor’s degrees in Social Psychology and Criminal Justice, master’s degrees in Human Resource Development and Criminology from Indiana State University, and a Ph.D. in Business Administration with a specialization in Criminal Justice from Northcentral University. A former U.S. Army officer, she served 11 years in the military and has extensive experience in criminal investigations through both military and civilian law enforcement, including work with a local sheriff’s department, a state drug task force, and the FBI. She lives in Clarkridge, Arkansas, with her husband, Dr. Michael Beshears, and their family.

The post American Corrections: From Early Penitentiaries to the Big House Era appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

Police Stress and Officer Wellness: Causes, Consequences, and Strategies for Resilience

By Dr. Michelle Beshears

The post Police Stress and Officer Wellness: Causes, Consequences, and Strategies for Resilience appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

By Dr. Michael Beshears

One of the central questions in criminology is not simply why people commit crimes, but rather why most people do not. While many criminological theories focus on the causes of criminal behavior, containment theory shifts the emphasis toward understanding the social and psychological factors that restrain individuals from engaging in crime. Rather than assuming that people naturally obey the law, containment theory argues that both internal and external forces work together to prevent criminal behavior.

Containment Theory, developed by criminologist Walter C. Reckless, proposes that criminal behavior is controlled through a combination of internal containment and external containment. Internal containment consists of an individual’s personal characteristics, such as self-control, a positive self-concept, moral values, and the ability to resist temptation. External containment refers to the social controls provided by family, schools, peer groups, community institutions, and the broader legal system. When these forms of containment are strong, individuals are better equipped to resist the pressures and temptations that may encourage criminal behavior.

A key component of internal containment is self-esteem, which develops from the relationship between an individual’s self-concept and the person he or she hopes to become. Individuals who possess a healthy self-image, confidence, and strong personal values are generally better able to resist criminal opportunities because they have developed internal standards that guide their behavior. Strong internal controls, often referred to as ego strengths, enable individuals to make responsible decisions even when confronted with difficult circumstances or negative influences.

Conversely, individuals with weak internal controls may be more vulnerable to criminal behavior. However, containment theory recognizes that strong external controls can compensate for these weaknesses. Supportive parents, positive peer groups, effective schools, community involvement, religious institutions, and consistent law enforcement all provide external sources of guidance and accountability. Even when an individual’s internal controls are underdeveloped, these external influences can discourage criminal behavior by reinforcing socially acceptable norms and expectations.

Reckless further argued that individuals encounter various pressures that either push or pull them toward criminal behavior. These influences can originate from within the individual or from the surrounding social environment.

Internal pushes consist of emotional and psychological conditions that create pressure toward deviant behavior. Feelings such as anger, frustration, anxiety, resentment, insecurity, rebellion, impulsivity, and restlessness may weaken an individual’s ability to exercise sound judgment. Without adequate coping skills or emotional regulation, these internal pressures can increase the likelihood of criminal conduct.

External pushes involve environmental conditions that create obstacles to achieving socially accepted goals. Poverty, unemployment, limited educational opportunities, discrimination, unstable family environments, and neighborhood disadvantage can generate frustration and strain that increase the risk of criminal involvement. These factors do not inevitably cause crime, but they create circumstances that make criminal behavior more likely for individuals lacking strong internal or external containment.

External pulls represent influences that actively attract individuals toward criminal behavior. Among the strongest external pulls are delinquent peer groups, gangs, criminal role models, and social environments that encourage law violations. Individuals often learn criminal attitudes and behaviors through association with others who view crime as acceptable or rewarding. The desire for acceptance, belonging, or status within these groups may gradually draw individuals into criminal activities they might otherwise avoid.

Containment theory closely complements Travis Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory, another influential explanation for conformity and law-abiding behavior. Hirschi argued that individuals refrain from committing crimes because they maintain strong bonds with conventional society. The stronger these bonds become, the less likely individuals are to engage in criminal behavior.

Hirschi identified four essential elements that comprise the social bond: attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief.

Attachment refers to the emotional relationships individuals develop with parents, teachers, friends, and other significant members of society. People who care about the opinions of those they respect are generally less willing to engage in behavior that would disappoint or harm those relationships. Strong attachments foster empathy, responsibility, and conformity to social expectations.

Commitment reflects the amount of time, effort, and personal investment individuals devote to achieving conventional goals. Educational achievement, career development, family responsibilities, and professional aspirations all represent investments that individuals are reluctant to jeopardize through criminal behavior. The greater the investment in legitimate pursuits, the greater the potential loss associated with criminal activity.

Involvement refers to participation in constructive activities that occupy an individual’s time and energy. School, employment, athletics, volunteer work, religious participation, community organizations, and family activities reduce opportunities for criminal behavior by keeping individuals engaged in socially approved pursuits. As Hirschi observed, individuals who are engaged in positive activities simply have less opportunity to commit crimes.

Belief represents an individual’s acceptance of society’s moral values, legal principles, and ethical standards. Individuals who believe that laws are legitimate and that obedience is morally appropriate are less likely to violate those laws. This belief system develops through family socialization, education, religious instruction, cultural traditions, and personal experiences that reinforce respect for social norms.

Both containment theory and social bond theory emphasize that criminal behavior cannot be understood solely by examining individual choices or biological characteristics. Instead, they highlight the importance of the environment in shaping behavior. Families, schools, peer groups, neighborhoods, and community institutions all influence the development of self-control, moral values, and social responsibility. These socializing agents help individuals distinguish right from wrong while providing the emotional support and supervision necessary to discourage criminal behavior.

Ultimately, the effectiveness of both theories rests on the interaction between the individual and the surrounding social environment. Strong internal controls, reinforced by supportive external relationships, create a powerful system of containment that encourages law-abiding behavior. Conversely, when individuals experience weak self-control, limited social support, exposure to delinquent peers, and environmental pressures simultaneously, the risk of criminal involvement increases substantially.

Although no single criminological theory explains every instance of criminal behavior, containment theory and social bond theory remain among the most influential perspectives for understanding why the overwhelming majority of individuals choose to obey the law. By emphasizing self-control, positive relationships, community involvement, and shared moral values, these theories continue to inform crime prevention strategies, juvenile justice programs, educational initiatives, and family interventions aimed at strengthening the social bonds that discourage criminal behavior.

About the Author: Dr. Michelle Beshears holds bachelor’s degrees in Social Psychology and Criminal Justice, master’s degrees in Human Resource Development and Criminology from Indiana State University, and a Ph.D. in Business Administration with a specialization in Criminal Justice from Northcentral University. A former U.S. Army officer, she served 11 years in the military and has extensive experience in criminal investigations through both military and civilian law enforcement, including work with a local sheriff’s department, a state drug task force, and the FBI. She lives in Clarkridge, Arkansas, with her husband, Dr. Michael Beshears, and their family.

The post Containment Theory and Social Bond Theory: Understanding Why People Obey the Law appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

Cumulative PTSD in Police Officers: The Hidden Toll

PTSD isn’t just a military issue; police officers face it too. Unlike soldiers, whose PTSD often comes from a single traumatic event, officers develop cumulative PTSD over years of repeated stress. This quiet buildup can affect their mental health, family life, and even public safety if left unaddressed.

What is Cumulative PTSD?

Cumulative PTSD develops gradually from multiple stressful experiences. While major incidents like officer-involved shootings often trigger support, day-to-day stressors usually go unrecognized, leaving officers vulnerable to untreated trauma.

Common Causes of PTSD in Policing

High-stress and dangerous situations contribute, but even routine work can accumulate stress:

• Fatal accidents and violent incidents

• Hostage or dangerous drug raids

• Long, unpredictable hours

• Difficult interactions with the public

• Department politics or internal conflict

• Public criticism and scrutiny

Even “smaller” stressors, repeated over time, can have profound effects.

Signs to Watch For

Early recognition is crucial. Signs appear across physical, behavioral, and emotional domains:

Physical: fatigue, nausea, chest pain, insomnia, nightmares, rapid heartbeat, headaches, teeth grinding, gastrointestinal issues.
Behavioral: withdrawal from family/friends, restlessness, emotional outbursts, paranoia, antisocial behaviors, increased substance use.
Emotional: anxiety, depression, irritability, anger, guilt, fear, denial, agitation.

Why Training Isn’t Enough

Recruits often receive situational and tactical training but are underprepared for the emotional toll of real-world policing. Many lack the coping tools needed to manage cumulative stress over time.

Support and Resources

Awareness of officer trauma is growing. Programs like the Station House Retreat offer:

• Inpatient and outpatient trauma therapy

• Peer-support networks

• Addiction treatment

• Family support services

These resources are essential to help officers manage the unique pressures of their profession.

Moving Forward

Cumulative PTSD is a hidden but serious challenge in law enforcement. Addressing it requires:

• Early recognition and intervention

• Accessible mental health resources

• Departmental support for long-term officer wellbeing

By acknowledging and treating cumulative PTSD, law enforcement can protect both officers and the communities they serve, building a healthier, more resilient workforce.

About the Author
Dr. Michelle L. Beshears holds degrees in social psychology, criminal justice, human resource development, and criminology, and earned her Ph.D. in Business Administration with a focus on Criminal Justice. She served 11 years in the U.S. Army, rising to the rank of Staff Sergeant before being commissioned as an officer. Dr. Beshears has led criminal investigations and collaborated with local, state, and federal agencies. She is an assistant professor of criminal justice at American Military University and a full-time faculty member in the School of Security and Global Studies.

The post Cumulative PTSD in Police Officers: The Hidden Toll appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

By Dr. Michelle Beshears

The landmark ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) forever changed the way police conduct custodial interrogations. Although often thought of as a Fifth Amendment case, Miranda bridges both the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966). The decision ensures that suspects in custody are aware of their rights and protects them from coercive interrogation.

Historical Foundations

Before Miranda, the Court in Malloy v. Hogan (1964) applied the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination to state prosecutions. Around the same time in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the Court affirmed that a suspect has the right to consult an attorney during questioning. Together, these precedents set the stage for Miranda by recognizing that silence and the right to counsel are essential safeguards for a suspect’s constitutional rights.

Miranda’s Bright Line and Purpose

Miranda is considered a “bright line” rule that prohibits coercive police conduct while still allowing officers to ask questions (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966). It was not designed to reform policing broadly but instead to prevent compelled confessions by recognizing the psychological disadvantage suspects face during custodial questioning.

Prior to Miranda, courts admitted confessions under a voluntariness test that examined the totality of the circumstances. After Miranda, officers must also demonstrate that suspects were warned of their rights and knowingly waived them before their statements may be admitted (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966).

Required Warnings and Intelligent Waiver

Miranda requires that suspects in custody be told:

1. They have the right to remain silent.

2. Anything they say may be used against them in a court of law.

3. They have the right to an attorney during questioning.

4. If they cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966).

Officers must then obtain an informed waiver by confirming that the suspect understands these rights and voluntarily chooses to speak.

The Custody and Interrogation Requirement

Miranda protections are triggered only when custody and interrogation coincide.

• Custody means that a reasonable person would believe they are not free to leave the premises. This includes formal arrest but may also apply in other situations, such as being locked in the back of a patrol car. Routine traffic stops or brief field interviews typically do not qualify as custodial interrogations (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966).

• Interrogation includes both direct questions and their functional equivalents—words or actions by officers that are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response (Rhode Island v. Innis, 1980). Even casual comments designed to provoke a reaction can be considered interrogation.

Doctrinal Exceptions and Appellate Doctrines

Over time, the Court has recognized several exceptions and doctrines that limit Miranda’s scope:

• Public Safety Exception: Officers may ask about immediate threats, such as the location of a weapon, without warnings (New York v. Quarles, 1984).

• Booking Questions: Routine questions during booking, such as name or address, do not trigger Miranda (Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 1990).

• Undercover Interrogation: When suspects speak with undercover officers or informants, Miranda does not apply (Illinois v. Perkins, 1990).

• Delayed Warnings: If a suspect makes an unwarned statement but later receives warnings and repeats the confession, the second statement may be admissible (Oregon v. Elstad, 1985).

• Harmless Error and Automatic Reversal: If an improperly admitted confession did not affect the outcome, the conviction may stand (Chapman v. California, 1967). However, when fundamental rights are violated, courts may automatically reverse the sentence.

• Civil Liability under § 1983: In Vega v. Tekoh (2022), the Court ruled that a failure to provide Miranda warnings does not, by itself, create grounds for a civil rights lawsuit.

Erosion, Adaptation, and Critique

Although Miranda initially demanded precise wording of warnings, later rulings allowed more flexible language as long as the essential rights are conveyed (Duckworth v. Eagan, 1989). Deliberate omissions, however, remain unacceptable.

Scholars continue to debate the effectiveness of Miranda. Some argue exceptions have eroded the decision, while others stress its importance in balancing state power and individual rights. Law review commentary has emphasized that the doctrine remains contested, particularly in light of Vega v. Tekoh and its impact on vulnerable populations such as youth (Langston & Donald, 2017; Eger, 2024).

Conclusion

Miranda rights remain a cornerstone of American criminal procedure, designed to guard against coerced confessions and protect the constitutional rights of suspects. Although narrowed by later rulings, the doctrine continues to symbolize fairness and accountability in the justice system. As courts and law enforcement adapt to new challenges, the balance between interrogation and individual liberty will continue to be a defining issue in U.S. criminal law.

References

• Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967).

• Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195 (1989).

• Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964).

• Eger, J. (2024). The right to remain protected: Upholding youths’ Fifth Amendment rights after Vega v. Tekoh. Virginia Law Review, 110(2), 301–345. https://virginialawreview.org/articles/the-right-to-remain-protected-upholding-youths-fifth-amendment-rights-after-vega-v-tekoh/

• Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292 (1990).

• Langston, N., & Donald, B. (2017). Fifty years later and Miranda still leaves us with questions. Texas Tech Law Review, 50(1), 1–29. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/1430/

• Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964).

• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/436/

• New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984).

• Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985).

• Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582 (1990).

• Rhode Island v. Innis, 454 U.S. 182 (1980).

About the Author
Dr. Michelle L. Beshears holds undergraduate degrees in social psychology and criminal justice, and graduate degrees in human resource development and criminology from Indiana State University. She served 11 years in the U.S. Army, achieving the rank of Staff Sergeant before commissioning as an officer. Dr. Beshears has led multiple criminal investigations and collaborated with federal and local agencies, including the FBI. She is pursuing a Doctorate in Criminal Justice and serves as an associate professor at American Military University & American Public University. She lives in Clarkridge, Arkansas, with her husband and two children.

The post Custodial Interrogation and the Legacy of Miranda Rights appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

By Dr. Michelle Beshears

When we think of policing, we often focus too narrowly on daily tasks such as patrols, arrests, and traffic stops. Policing is deeply tied to how society defines authority, order, and public trust. To fully understand the police role, we must examine not only what officers do, but also how public legitimacy, reform pressure, and community expectations shape their mission.

Traditional Foundations: Roles and Functions

Scholars have long identified broad responsibilities for police. These include preventing threats to life and property, protecting individuals from harm, facilitating the safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians, assisting vulnerable groups, resolving conflicts, identifying emerging problems before escalation, and maintaining community security. These functions demonstrate that policing is not limited to crime suppression, but also encompasses service, prevention, and problem-solving (Tyler, 2025).

In sociological terms:

• A role is what society expects from police, such as using force or gathering information.

• A function describes what police do to maintain social stability, whether intended or unintended.

• A mandate merges legal duties with a vision for future policing.

• Style, image, ideology, and socialization influence how officers behave under stress, how they present themselves, how narratives are constructed, and how they absorb police culture over time (Cassino & Demir, 2024).

Contemporary Pressures: Legitimacy, Reform, and Trust

High-profile incidents have intensified debates about how policing is conducted and whether communities perceive it as fair and just.

Legitimacy and Procedural Justice

Legitimacy is central to effective policing. Research shows that compliance with police directives is tied to perceptions of fairness, neutrality, and respect during interactions (Tyler, 2025). Similarly, studies indicate that officers’ sense of self-legitimacy, their belief in their own authority and fairness, is associated with more substantial support for community-oriented practices (Meško, 2025). This suggests legitimacy operates on both sides of the badge, shaping how officers and communities engage with each other.

Reform and Misconduct Reduction

Efforts to reform policing are widespread, but their effectiveness is a topic of debate. For example, one study of reform legislation found that misconduct, including use-of-force incidents, decreased after implementation; however, challenges in culture and accountability persisted (Cassino & Demir, 2024). This reinforces the idea that reform must extend beyond policy change to address organizational culture and accountability systems.

Technology, Bias, and Policing

Modern policing also faces challenges brought by technology. Body-worn cameras, predictive algorithms, and machine learning tools now influence how encounters are recorded and analyzed. A recent study showed how different stakeholders frame algorithmic bias in predictive policing differently, reflecting competing ideas of fairness and risk (Ziosi & Pruss, 2024). While these tools can promote transparency, they also introduce ethical dilemmas about surveillance and equity.

Conclusion

Policing in America is not a static institution, but a complex one shaped by history, roles, community expectations, and ongoing reform. Its traditional functions, including order maintenance, safety, service, and enforcement, provide the foundation. Yet legitimacy, reform, and technology are reshaping what policing must become in the 21st century.

The future of policing depends not only on what officers do but also on whether communities believe they act reasonably and with accountability. The balance between authority and service, enforcement and legitimacy, will continue to define the path of American policing.

References

Cassino, P. P., & Demir, M. (2024). The effect of police reform on overall police misconduct and misconduct that involves the use of force. Journal of Criminal Justice, 91, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102263

Meško, G. (2025). Police officers’ self-legitimacy and support for community policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15614263.2025.2507119

Tyler, T. R. (2025). Legitimacy-based policing. Policing and Society. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12695

Ziosi, M., & Pruss, D. (2024). Evidence of what, for whom? The socially contested role of algorithmic bias in a predictive policing tool. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07715

About the Author
Dr. Michelle L. Beshears holds undergraduate degrees in social psychology and criminal justice, as well as graduate degrees in human resource development and criminology, from Indiana State University. She served 11 years in the U.S. Army, achieving the rank of Staff Sergeant before commissioning as an officer. Dr. Beshears has led multiple criminal investigations and collaborated with federal and local agencies, including the FBI. She is pursuing a Doctorate in Criminal Justice and serves as an associate professor at American Military University & American Public University. She lives in Clarkridge, Arkansas, with her husband and two children.

The post The Role of Police in American Society: Foundations, Functions, and Contemporary Reforms appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

Social Capital in the 21st Century: Implications for Community and Policing

In their landmark 1982 article, “Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety,” James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling proposed that visible signs of disorder, such as broken windows or graffiti, signal neglect and invite further disorder and more serious crime. This concept, known as the broken windows theory, was further explored by Wesley Skogan, who examined over 40 cities and described disorder as the first step in “the downward spiral of urban decay” (Harcourt, 2001).

Building on this idea, community policing strategies incorporated principles from the broken windows hypothesis. Police departments began emphasizing the enforcement of misdemeanor laws and adopted zero-tolerance approaches to minor offenses. At the same time, residents engaged in civic activities and community collaboration, sometimes referred to as social capitalism, helped reinforce public safety efforts. While no peer-reviewed studies definitively link these social initiatives to the nationwide decline in violent crime since 1990, correlations suggest that cooperative community engagement may have contributed to the decrease alongside policing efforts (Gramlich, 2019).

However, critics such as Harcourt (2001) caution that the broken windows theory alone does not explain reductions in crime. He argues that aggressive surveillance, stop-and-frisk policies, and misdemeanor arrests likely played a more central role. Yet, the involvement of community members remains an essential complement to law enforcement strategies.

Recent decades have seen a decline in civic engagement and social capital, a phenomenon famously described by Robert Putnam as Bowling Alone (as cited in Smith, 2007). Changes in family structures, suburban sprawl, and the rise of electronic entertainment have led to a decline in face-to-face interactions and a loss of neighborhood cohesion. Generational shifts have exacerbated this trend, with younger populations, namely, baby boomers and Generation X, participating less in traditional forms of community life (Smith, 2007).

Looking ahead, there are concerns that future generations may experience even weaker social bonds. Whereas past communities gathered for holidays, children played outside, and neighbors knew one another, technology has created barriers to direct interaction. Phone calls, video chats, and indoor entertainment have largely replaced in-person connections. Observing contemporary social patterns, it is clear that many people remain unaware of their surroundings, instead being absorbed by digital devices. Scholars suggest that declining interpersonal skills may undermine community policing efforts, which rely on active participation from residents. Without a socially engaged public, the strategies that once contributed to safer neighborhoods may lose their effectiveness.

In summary, while policing strategies remain critical, fostering social connections and civic engagement is equally important. Strengthening community ties may not only complement law enforcement but also sustain safer, more resilient neighborhoods in the future.

References

Gramlich, J. (2019, January). 5 facts about crime in the U.S. Fact Tank. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/03/5-facts-about-crime-in-the-u-s/

Harcourt, B. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Harvard University Press.

Smith, M. K. (2007). Robert Putnam, social capital and civic community. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Republished website, Infed. http://infed.org/mobi/robert-putnam-social-capital-and-civic-community/

About the Author: 

Dr. Beshears holds an associate degree in general studies, dual bachelor’s degrees in criminal justice and psychology from Drury University, a master’s in criminology from Indiana State University, a master’s in health services management from Webster University, and 18 additional graduate hours in public administration. He earned his Ph.D. in Business with a specialization in Criminal Justice from Northcentral University. A retired U.S. Army Master Sergeant with 22 years of honorable service, he was named Non-Commissioned Officer of the Year at two commands and is a graduate of the Army Leadership Academy. As a civilian, he has worked with local sheriff’s departments, a state drug task force, and the FBI. Dr. Beshears brings over 30 years of teaching experience, both online and in traditional classrooms, having instructed more than 50,000 students in criminal justice, corrections, and management. He has also mentored colleagues in online instruction and strategies for student success.

The post Social Capital in the 21st Century: Implications for Community and Policing appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

The Global Organ Crisis: Human Trafficking and the Illicit Organ Trade

The Global Organ Shortage: A 2024–2025 Snapshot

The global organ shortage remains a critical issue, with demand far outstripping supply. As of May 2025, the United States has over 103,000 individuals on the national transplant waiting list (OrganDonor.gov, 2025). Despite a record-breaking 48,149 transplants performed in 2024 (United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS], 2025), the gap between supply and demand continues to grow.

Internationally, the situation is equally dire. In the United Kingdom, nearly 12,000 individuals are awaiting organ transplants (The Guardian, 2025). In India, over 500,000 patients require organs annually, yet fewer than 1,100 deceased donors contributed in 2024 (Times of India, 2024). These disparities are exacerbated in regions with limited transplant infrastructure.

The Illicit Organ Trade: Scale and Scope

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 5–10% of all transplants worldwide involve organs from the black market (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [UNODC], 2024). This illicit trade is valued between $840 million and $1.7 billion annually (Library of Parliament [LOP], 2024). Organ trafficking networks often exploit vulnerable populations, including impoverished individuals and marginalized communities, who are coerced or deceived into selling their organs.

A notable case is that of Martha Alicia Mendez Aguilar, known as “La Diabla,” a member of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, arrested in September 2025 for allegedly operating a trafficking ring involving the illegal harvesting of organs and the sale of babies (New York Post, 2025).

Legislative Responses and Enforcement Challenges

In response to the growing crisis, the World Health Assembly adopted a resolution in May 2024 to increase the availability, ethical access, and oversight of transplantation of human cells, tissues, and organs (World Health Organization [WHO], 2024). However, enforcement remains a significant challenge due to the clandestine nature of organ trafficking networks and the need for international cooperation.

Protecting Vulnerable Populations

Vulnerable populations, including children and marginalized communities, are at heightened risk of exploitation for organ trafficking. Reports indicate that criminal organizations have targeted these groups for illegal organ harvesting, often under the guise of medical treatment. Protective measures, including legal safeguards and awareness campaigns, are crucial in combating this exploitation.

Addressing the Crisis: A Multifaceted Approach

To mitigate the global organ shortage and combat the illicit trade, a comprehensive strategy is required:

• Increase Public Organ Donation: Implementing policies to encourage organ donation, such as presumed consent systems, and launching public awareness campaigns can help close the supply-demand gap.

• Strengthen International Legal Frameworks: Explicitly criminalizing organ trafficking and enhancing cross-border enforcement are critical to dismantling illicit networks.

• Protect Vulnerable Populations: Implementing poverty alleviation programs, strengthening social safety nets, and increasing access to healthcare can reduce the vulnerability of at-risk populations.

• Enhance Global Monitoring: Establishing international databases and increasing transparency in transplant systems can help detect and prevent illegal activities.

Without comprehensive interventions, the illicit organ market will continue to thrive, exploiting the poor while patients in need face life-or-death decisions.

References

Library of Parliament. (2024). Human trafficking for organ removal in Canada and globally. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/202083E

New York Post. (2025, September 25). Female cartel member ‘La Diabla’ busted for running horrific baby-trafficking, organ-harvesting rings. https://nypost.com/2025/09/25/world-news/la-diabla-martha-aguilar-arrested-for-alleged-baby-trafficking-organ-harvesting-rings/

OrganDonor.gov. (2025). Learn about organ donation statistics. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.organdonor.gov/learn/organ-donation-statistics

The Guardian. (2025, July 9). Number of patients in UK waiting for lifesaving organ transplant at record high. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jul/09/number-of-patients-in-uk-waiting-for-lifesaving-organ-transplant-at-record-high

Times of India. (2024, December 12). Online organ donation portal to bridge demand-supply gap. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/online-organ-donation-portal-to-bridge-demand-supply-gap/articleshow/124129657.cms

United Network for Organ Sharing. (2025). U.S. surpassed 48,000 organ transplants in 2024. https://unos.org/media-resources/releases/u-s-surpassed-48000-organ-transplants-in-2024/

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2024). Explainer: Understanding human trafficking for organ removal. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/frontpage/2024/June/explainer_-understanding-human-trafficking-for-organ-removal.html

World Health Organization. (2024, May 30). Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly – Daily update. https://www.who.int/news/item/30-05-2024-seventy-seventh-world-health-assembly—daily-update–30-may-2024

About the Author
Dr. Michelle L. Beshears holds undergraduate degrees in social psychology and criminal justice, as well as graduate degrees in human resource development and criminology, from Indiana State University. She served 11 years in the U.S. Army, achieving the rank of Staff Sergeant before commissioning as an officer. Dr. Beshears has led multiple criminal investigations and collaborated with federal and local agencies, including the FBI. She is pursuing a Doctorate in Criminal Justice and serves as an associate professor at American Military University & American Public University. She lives in Clarkridge, Arkansas, with her husband and two children.

The post The Global Organ Crisis: Human Trafficking and the Illicit Organ Trade appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

Cumulative PTSD in Police Officers: The Hidden Toll

PTSD isn’t just a military issue—police officers face it too. Unlike soldiers, whose PTSD often comes from a single traumatic event, officers develop cumulative PTSD over years of repeated stress. This quiet buildup can affect their mental health, family life, and even public safety if left unaddressed.

What is Cumulative PTSD?

Cumulative PTSD develops gradually from multiple stressful experiences. While major incidents like officer-involved shootings often trigger support, day-to-day stressors usually go unrecognized, leaving officers vulnerable to untreated trauma.

Common Causes of PTSD in Policing

High-stress and dangerous situations contribute, but even routine work can accumulate stress:

• Fatal accidents and violent incidents

• Hostage or dangerous drug raids

• Long, unpredictable hours

• Difficult interactions with the public

• Department politics or internal conflict

• Public criticism and scrutiny

Even “smaller” stressors, repeated over time, can have serious effects.

Signs to Watch For

Early recognition is crucial. Signs appear across physical, behavioral, and emotional domains:

Physical: fatigue, nausea, chest pain, insomnia, nightmares, rapid heartbeat, headaches, teeth grinding, gastrointestinal issues.
Behavioral: withdrawal from family/friends, restlessness, emotional outbursts, paranoia, antisocial behaviors, increased substance use.
Emotional: anxiety, depression, irritability, anger, guilt, fear, denial, agitation.

Why Training Isn’t Enough

Recruits often receive situational and tactical training but are underprepared for the emotional toll of real-world policing. Many lack the coping tools needed to manage cumulative stress over time.

Support and Resources

Awareness of officer trauma is growing. Programs like the Station House Retreat offer:

• Inpatient and outpatient trauma therapy

• Peer-support networks

• Addiction treatment

• Family support services

These resources are essential to help officers manage the unique pressures of their profession.

Moving Forward

Cumulative PTSD is a hidden but serious challenge in law enforcement. Addressing it requires:

• Early recognition and intervention

• Accessible mental health resources

• Departmental support for long-term officer wellbeing

By acknowledging and treating cumulative PTSD, law enforcement can protect both officers and the communities they serve, building a healthier, more resilient workforce.

About the Author
Dr. Michelle L. Beshears holds degrees in social psychology, criminal justice, human resource development, and criminology, and earned her Ph.D. in Business Administration with a focus on Criminal Justice. She served 11 years in the U.S. Army, rising to the rank of Staff Sergeant before being commissioned as an officer. Dr. Beshears has led criminal investigations and collaborated with local, state, and federal agencies. She is an associate professor of criminal justice at American Military University and a full-time faculty member in the School of Security and Global Studies.

The post Cumulative PTSD in Police Officers: The Hidden Toll appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.

Policing, Counterterrorism, and the Balance of Civil Liberties

By Dr. Michael L. Beshears

Introduction

Law enforcement in the United States faces a complex challenge: preventing terrorism while upholding the constitutional rights of citizens. Since the September 11 attacks, this dual responsibility has grown more critical, as terrorism continues to pose both domestic and international threats. High-profile attacks globally underscore the need for strategies that balance public safety with respect for civil liberties (Alblooshi & Kassim, 2022; Alexander & Al-Harbi, 2022; Montasari, 2023).

Counterterrorism Policing Models

Scholars and practitioners identify two primary approaches to counterterrorism policing: centralized, security-focused models, and intelligence-driven, community-oriented models. Centralized models emphasize a unified, highly coordinated police or security force capable of rapid response and proactive intervention. Intelligence-driven approaches prioritize data collection, analysis, and collaboration with local communities and other agencies to detect and prevent terrorist activities before they occur (Alblooshi & Kassim, 2022; Montasari, 2023).

Lessons from Centralized Policing

Countries such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE) utilize centralized policing structures to manage terrorism risks. Police and security forces actively gather intelligence, monitor potential threats, and maintain high visibility in public spaces (Alexander & Al-Harbi, 2022). Citizens are encouraged to remain vigilant, report any suspicious behavior, and adhere to security protocols. Such proactive engagement has proven effective in reducing the success of terrorist operations.

However, centralized and highly militarized approaches carry challenges. Concentrated authority and visible security measures can create tension between law enforcement and the public if citizens perceive that their freedoms are being restricted. While centralization facilitates rapid counterterrorism action, it requires careful management to maintain public trust and prevent perceptions of overreach (Alblooshi & Kassim, 2022).

Intelligence-Led Policing in the United States

In the United States, intelligence-led policing (ILP) aligns with existing community-oriented practices. ILP relies on the collection and analysis of data, interagency collaboration, and information sharing with the public to identify and mitigate potential threats (Montasari, 2023). By analyzing patterns and pre-incident indicators, ILP enables law enforcement to deploy resources where threats are most likely to emerge, allowing for proactive deployment.

Community trust is a cornerstone of ILP. Citizens are more likely to report suspicious activity if they feel confident that police will act responsibly and respect civil liberties. Without public cooperation, actionable intelligence may remain undiscovered, limiting law enforcement’s ability to prevent attacks (Alblooshi & Kassim, 2022). Transparency, accountability, and ethical use of data are therefore essential components of an effective intelligence-led strategy.

Balancing Security and Civil Liberties

Counterterrorism requires that law enforcement not only act effectively but also uphold democratic principles. Excessive reliance on militarized tactics, surveillance, or centralized authority risks eroding public trust and undermining the legitimacy of policing efforts (Alexander & Al-Harbi, 2022). In contrast, intelligence-led approaches foster collaboration, enable preventive interventions, and respect constitutional protections, creating a framework suitable for the American context.

Conclusion

Since 2001, law enforcement has been tasked with integrating counterterrorism into its daily operations. Lessons from centralized models abroad, such as in the UAE, demonstrate the benefits of vigilance and proactive intervention, while also highlighting the importance of maintaining public trust. Intelligence-led policing, with its emphasis on data, interagency collaboration, and community engagement, offers a balanced approach that enables U.S. law enforcement to address terrorism threats effectively while preserving civil liberties.

Figure 1
Comparison of Centralized (UAE) and Intelligence-Led (U.S.) Counterterrorism Policing Models

Note. Adapted from Alblooshi & Kassim (2022), Alexander & Al-Harbi (2022), and Montasari (2023). This table highlights key differences between centralized/militarized counterterrorism policing and intelligence-led policing approaches, illustrating their respective strengths and limitations.

References

Alblooshi, F., & Kassim, N. (2022). An analysis of counter-terrorism strategies in the United States and the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 70, 100531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100531

Alexander, K., & Al-Harbi, E. (2022). Terrorism and counterterrorism in the UAE. In Facets of security in the United Arab Emirates (pp. 63–75). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003025566-9/terrorism-counterterrorism-uae-kristian-alexander-ebrahim-al-harbi

Montasari, R. (2023). Countering cyberterrorism: The confluence of artificial intelligence, cyber forensics, and digital policing in US and UK national cybersecurity (Vol. 101). Springer Nature. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366777395_Countering_Cyberterrorism_The_Confluence_of_Artificial_Intelligence_Cyber_Forensics_and_Digital_Policing_in_US_and_UK_National_Cybersecurity

About the Author: 

Dr. Beshears holds an associate degree in general studies, dual bachelor’s degrees in criminal justice and psychology from Drury University, a master’s in criminology from Indiana State University, a master’s in health services management from Webster University, and 18 additional graduate hours in public administration. He earned his Ph.D. in Business with a specialization in Criminal Justice from Northcentral University. A retired U.S. Army Master Sergeant with 22 years of honorable service, he was named Non-Commissioned Officer of the Year at two commands and is a graduate of the Army Leadership Academy. As a civilian, he has worked with local sheriff’s departments, a state drug task force, and the FBI. Dr. Beshears brings over 30 years of teaching experience, both online and in traditional classrooms, having instructed more than 50,000 students in criminal justice, corrections, and management. He has also mentored colleagues in online instruction and strategies for student success.

The post Policing, Counterterrorism, and the Balance of Civil Liberties appeared first on Public Safety Magazine.