<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 11:43:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>fda</category><category>clinical trial</category><category>medical devices</category><category>EU</category><category>ForeignExchange Translations</category><category>translation</category><category>Covance</category><category>risk management</category><category>CROs</category><category>Clinical research</category><category>PRA International</category><category>mdd</category><category>risk</category><category>Helen Colquhoun</category><category>Pleiad</category><category>Regulatory</category><category>localization</category><category>Andres heuberger</category><category>IVD</category><category>Writing</category><category>compliance</category><category>labeling</category><category>Clinical data</category><category>GCP</category><category>China</category><category>Ombu Enterprises</category><category>CE Marking</category><category>Dan O&#39;Leary</category><category>Granzer Regulatory Consulting</category><category>Jason Heaton</category><category>culture</category><category>510k</category><category>EMEA</category><category>ISO 14155</category><category>ISO14971</category><category>Submission</category><category>globalization</category><category>Asia</category><category>Data Quality</category><category>Dr. Joy Frestedt</category><category>Fredrikson and Byron</category><category>Frestedt Incorporated</category><category>Michor Consulting EU</category><category>Salma Michor</category><category>Vendor</category><category>data</category><category>eLearning</category><category>language</category><category>software</category><category>training</category><category>FMEA</category><category>GMP</category><category>IEC60601-1</category><category>India</category><category>Pleiad Devices</category><category>QA</category><category>clinical study</category><category>devices</category><category>patent</category><category>recruiting</category><category>risk mitigation</category><category>social media</category><category>Eisner Safety Consultants</category><category>IEC 60601-1</category><category>John Smart</category><category>Leo Eisner</category><category>Nancy Hoft</category><category>RFP</category><category>Robert J. Klepinski</category><category>documentation</category><category>drug development</category><category>ghtf</category><category>human factors</category><category>regulation</category><category>sponser</category><category>trial</category><category>21CFR 820</category><category>Beckloff Associates</category><category>Covance Periapproval Services</category><category>Directive 93/42/EEC</category><category>ICH</category><category>ISO 13485:2003</category><category>Inc.</category><category>Japan</category><category>Notifed Body</category><category>Patient recruitment</category><category>PharmaNet</category><category>ROI</category><category>SMART Communications</category><category>legal</category><category>qsr</category><category>relationship</category><category>risk analysis</category><category>Alquest</category><category>Amy Wise</category><category>CAPA</category><category>Carol Houts</category><category>ConsentSolutions</category><category>Dr. Ulrich Granzer</category><category>FCPA</category><category>FSMA</category><category>Gina Ross</category><category>HR</category><category>IT</category><category>JBI Studios</category><category>Janice Ma</category><category>Linguist</category><category>Maria Shepherd</category><category>Markus Weber</category><category>Oncology</category><category>SFDA</category><category>XML</category><category>Xavier Marchand</category><category>biomarker</category><category>cmc</category><category>eCTD</category><category>effect analysis</category><category>failure mode</category><category>marketing</category><category>regulatory submission</category><category>Beckloff Associates a Cardinal Health Company</category><category>ChinaGate</category><category>Data Decision Group</category><category>Data Management</category><category>Directive 90/385/EEC</category><category>Dr. Susan Sisk</category><category>Emergo Group</category><category>FTC</category><category>IDE</category><category>IFU</category><category>IND</category><category>IVDD</category><category>Jovianna DiCarlo</category><category>Larchmont Strategic Advisors</category><category>Latin America</category><category>Marion Weinreb</category><category>Marion Weinreb and Associates</category><category>Patient</category><category>SFP Consulting</category><category>Steven Walfish</category><category>System Safety Inc.</category><category>Ulrich Granzer</category><category>World Courier</category><category>clinical</category><category>e-labeling</category><category>global marketing</category><category>healthcare</category><category>quality system</category><category>teamwork</category><category>warning letter</category><category>ATMP</category><category>Accugenex Technologies</category><category>Angelika Zerfass</category><category>CMS</category><category>Design</category><category>Device Trials</category><category>Dr. Malgorzata Szerszeniewska</category><category>EMA</category><category>EN 15038:2006</category><category>ERA Consulting (UK) Ltd</category><category>Eastern Europe</category><category>Futuro Sólido</category><category>GE Healthcare</category><category>Harvey Rudolph</category><category>ISO 13485</category><category>IVR</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Lynda McDermott</category><category>Maria D. Buckley</category><category>Matt Stumm</category><category>Melissa Burkhardt</category><category>PRA</category><category>Performance Connections International</category><category>Phase I studies</category><category>Phil Brown</category><category>Quintiles</category><category>R and D</category><category>Rob Laurens</category><category>SPL</category><category>Spanish</category><category>TUV SUD America Inc.</category><category>Vinny Sastri</category><category>Winovia LLC</category><category>adaptive cilnical trial</category><category>adverse event</category><category>audit</category><category>budget</category><category>business development</category><category>centralized procedure</category><category>clinical development</category><category>e-consent</category><category>food safety</category><category>healthcare reform</category><category>off-label</category><category>rems</category><category>safety</category><category>software internationalization</category><category>supply chain</category><category>translate</category><category>vigilance</category><category>2K Clinical Consulting</category><category>483</category><category>505(b)(2)</category><category>Annette Valles-Sukkar</category><category>BBK Healthcare</category><category>Benefits</category><category>Bethany Gilbert</category><category>CDASH</category><category>CER</category><category>CRA</category><category>CRF Design</category><category>CardioMed Device Consultants</category><category>Caryn Silverman</category><category>Cerulean Associates LLC</category><category>Christopher Rhodes</category><category>Communication Partners</category><category>Court Square Group</category><category>DOJ</category><category>David Kern</category><category>Decentralized Procedure</category><category>Don Bridges</category><category>Dr. Edward E. Berger</category><category>Dr. Elisa Harvey</category><category>Dr. Howard Hubbell</category><category>Dr. John Constant</category><category>Dr. Stefan Blesse</category><category>Dr. Susan Brink</category><category>EDC</category><category>Edward C. Ian</category><category>Efraim Roe Kozorovitsky</category><category>Employee</category><category>EquiPro International</category><category>Eunice Franklin-Becker</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Federico Fische</category><category>Health Decisions</category><category>Hilary Davies</category><category>Hodgson Russ LLP</category><category>Hubbell Consulting</category><category>IVRS</category><category>James Bird</category><category>Janette Benaddi</category><category>Jardine Lloyd Thompson</category><category>Joe Jenkins</category><category>John Avellanet</category><category>John Postle</category><category>Kalypso</category><category>Karen Oliver</category><category>Karl Keller</category><category>Kelly Savage Day</category><category>Kent Thoelke</category><category>Kestrel Consultants</category><category>Kimberly Kiner</category><category>Kit Howard</category><category>Linda Alexander</category><category>LinkedIn</category><category>MDD 93/42/EEC</category><category>Medical device directive</category><category>Medvance</category><category>Michael Rosenberg</category><category>Moran and Arnold LLP</category><category>NDA</category><category>Nutter McClennen and Fish LLP</category><category>PIM</category><category>PIP</category><category>Peter Simpson</category><category>PhD</category><category>Premier Research Group</category><category>QMS</category><category>Registries</category><category>Robert Klepinski</category><category>SOP</category><category>Segmedica</category><category>Solutions2Projects</category><category>Sonia Monahan</category><category>Terri Mead</category><category>Twitter</category><category>Underwriters Laboratories</category><category>adaptive design</category><category>attorney</category><category>back translation</category><category>central europe</category><category>cgmp</category><category>clinical evaluation</category><category>clinical supply</category><category>clinicaltrials.gov</category><category>combination products</category><category>communication</category><category>content management</category><category>controlled english</category><category>ctd</category><category>e-patient</category><category>elabeling</category><category>electronic common technical document</category><category>electronic submissions</category><category>europe</category><category>fdaaa</category><category>hazard analysis</category><category>human tissue</category><category>in-country review</category><category>law</category><category>measurable quality</category><category>meddev</category><category>meddev 2.12-1</category><category>metrics</category><category>paediatric investigation plan</category><category>phase III</category><category>pma</category><category>post-marketing</category><category>quality</category><category>quality metrics</category><category>reimbursement</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>sharepoint</category><category>supreme court</category><category>title VIII</category><category>video</category><category>website</category><category>2007/47/EC</category><category>21CFR 211</category><category>93/42/EEC</category><category>98/79/EC</category><category>A/V</category><category>AE</category><category>ASTM F 2575-06</category><category>Adam Asnes</category><category>Advanced Therapies Medicinal Products</category><category>Alan Minsk</category><category>Allison Fitzpatrick</category><category>Amster Rothstein and Ebenstein LLP</category><category>Ana T. Menendez</category><category>Anabel Pérez</category><category>Andrew Tait</category><category>Angelo Scangas</category><category>Ann Quinlan-Smith</category><category>Annette Stemhagen</category><category>Anthony Bishop</category><category>Anthony F. Lo Cicero</category><category>Anthony L. Fitzhugh</category><category>Anthony Leone</category><category>Arnall Golden Gregory LLP</category><category>Arrastia and Capote LLP</category><category>Asia Pacific Bio Intelligence</category><category>AssurX</category><category>BBK Worldwide</category><category>Baker and Daniels LLP</category><category>Barbara Vargas</category><category>Beth Mandel</category><category>Beverly H. Lorell</category><category>BioClinica</category><category>Biocoat Inc.</category><category>Biosimilars</category><category>Bob Barrett</category><category>Bracewell and Giuliani</category><category>Brett Bishop</category><category>Bromberg and Sunstein LLP</category><category>Bruce A. Silverglade</category><category>Bruce D. Sunstein</category><category>Bruce Fern</category><category>CDER</category><category>CDISC</category><category>CEE</category><category>CHMP</category><category>CLIA</category><category>CME</category><category>CPGM</category><category>Canada</category><category>Catalent Pharma Solutions</category><category>Centralised Procedure</category><category>Charles Rathmann</category><category>Clifford Chance</category><category>Community Health Systems</category><category>Compliance Implementation Services</category><category>Core Risks Ltd</category><category>Covance Asia Pacific</category><category>Covance IVRS</category><category>DCP</category><category>DSMB</category><category>Daryl Wisdahl</category><category>Davis and Gilbert LLP</category><category>Device Regulation</category><category>Donawa Lifescience Consulting</category><category>Dr. Brett Bishop</category><category>Dr. Dirk Stynen</category><category>Dr. Edward Berger</category><category>Dr. Eldora Ellison</category><category>Dr. Greg Onyszchuk</category><category>Dr. Helen Ormandy</category><category>Dr. Jaap Laufer</category><category>Dr. Jeff Kaplan</category><category>Dr. Larry Hofmann</category><category>Dr. Ludwig Huber</category><category>Dr. Nermeen Varawalla</category><category>Dr. Ute Berger</category><category>EDM Services</category><category>EU Medical device directive</category><category>Employee free choice act</category><category>Eoghan O&#39;Maolain</category><category>Eric Henning</category><category>Evangeline Loh</category><category>FPI</category><category>Fairmount Partners</category><category>Ferrazzi Greenlight</category><category>Fulbright and Jaworski LLP</category><category>Geert Langendries</category><category>Gordon F Kapke</category><category>HFE</category><category>HIPAA</category><category>HITECH</category><category>Hal Ward</category><category>Hayden Resources Inc</category><category>Herb Cohen</category><category>Hong Kong</category><category>ICR</category><category>IRB</category><category>ISO 9001</category><category>ISO13485</category><category>ISO14971:2007</category><category>IWR</category><category>Intertech Engineering Associates</category><category>Israel</category><category>Jamie L. Kendall</category><category>Jason Arnsparger</category><category>Jerome Wilson</category><category>Jodie-Beth Galos</category><category>John E. Kelly</category><category>John English</category><category>John T. English Regulatory Consulting</category><category>Jonathan Andrus</category><category>Josh Simon</category><category>KEMA</category><category>Kathleen Kushner</category><category>Kent Fernald</category><category>Kevin McCabe</category><category>King and Spalding LLP</category><category>Korea</category><category>LLC</category><category>LMH Associates</category><category>LabCompliance</category><category>Laura J. Protzmann</category><category>Linda Wolf</category><category>LingoPort</category><category>Lisa Anne Friday</category><category>Lisa Capote</category><category>Lowrie Lando and Anastasi LLP</category><category>Lura Wolfe</category><category>MEDIcept</category><category>MRP</category><category>Marc Besen</category><category>Marian J. Lee</category><category>Mark Nelson Tyrrell</category><category>Marna Hayden</category><category>Medical Devices Directive</category><category>Medtronic</category><category>Michael Halper</category><category>Michael Martorelli</category><category>Michael R. Samardzija</category><category>Michael van der Woude</category><category>Michelle Merola</category><category>Mika Reinikainen</category><category>Myraqa</category><category>NCE</category><category>Nancy Hoft Consulting</category><category>NeeS</category><category>PUMA</category><category>Pam Atwell</category><category>Pamela J. Vaughan</category><category>PhRMA</category><category>Pharma</category><category>PokaYoke</category><category>Policy Technologies International</category><category>Qarad</category><category>Quality Support Group</category><category>RFQ</category><category>RMS</category><category>RWD Technologies</category><category>Reprint</category><category>Reprinting</category><category>RoHS</category><category>Rob Wagner</category><category>Ross Rothmeier</category><category>SAG</category><category>SDTM</category><category>Sandra La Brasca</category><category>Sedgwick Detert Moran and Arnold LLP</category><category>Sedgwick LLP</category><category>Sequent</category><category>Seth J. Goldenberg</category><category>Sherry Bright</category><category>Singapore</category><category>Small World Medical</category><category>Susan Brink</category><category>Susan Schenk</category><category>Susan Stansfield</category><category>TM</category><category>Taiwan</category><category>Tamar June</category><category>Tamas Borsai</category><category>Technical and Quality Services LLC</category><category>Thailand</category><category>The Dannon Company</category><category>The Weinberg Group</category><category>Todd Arney</category><category>UK</category><category>UK Bribery Act</category><category>UL</category><category>VHA Mountain States</category><category>Vicky Czarnik</category><category>Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine</category><category>Washington University</category><category>Wisdahl Consulting Group</category><category>Yvonne Albright</category><category>aCROnordic</category><category>aami</category><category>animal tissue</category><category>ansi</category><category>anti-corruption</category><category>antitrust</category><category>audio</category><category>case studies</category><category>clinical cold chain</category><category>clinical sites</category><category>communcation</category><category>device labeling</category><category>distance training</category><category>dossier</category><category>drug distribution</category><category>drug trial</category><category>eMDR</category><category>eclinical</category><category>employment law</category><category>esg</category><category>fdc act</category><category>fdca</category><category>financial</category><category>first amendment</category><category>hhs rule</category><category>hydrophilic</category><category>iec 62403:2006</category><category>in country review</category><category>in-vitro diagnostic</category><category>inspection</category><category>japanese device submission</category><category>ksr</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>liability</category><category>licensing</category><category>linguistic quality</category><category>literature</category><category>management system</category><category>market research</category><category>market surveillance</category><category>mdlogix</category><category>meddev 2.14/3</category><category>medical device coatings</category><category>medical device trials</category><category>medical education</category><category>medical electrical devices</category><category>medical technology</category><category>medicare</category><category>medimmune</category><category>merger</category><category>middle east</category><category>negotiation</category><category>net present value</category><category>nih</category><category>patient safety</category><category>payment sunshine act</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>phase II</category><category>policies</category><category>pre-IDE</category><category>presentation</category><category>procedures</category><category>protocol</category><category>protocol violation</category><category>quality assurance</category><category>quality manangement system</category><category>quality systems</category><category>regulatory bodies</category><category>regulatory writing</category><category>requests for proposal</category><category>research</category><category>site selection</category><category>spl-r4</category><category>standards</category><category>supplier controls</category><category>team</category><category>teleflex</category><category>trademark</category><category>training tools</category><category>translation memory</category><category>trial design</category><category>usability</category><category>workforce</category><category>15038:2006</category><category>1774/2002</category><category>2001/83</category><category>2003/32/EC</category><category>2004/23/EC</category><category>2007/47/EEC</category><category>21 common errors</category><category>21CFR 11</category><category>40 CFR Part 98</category><category>4010A1</category><category>4MAT 4Business</category><category>60601-1</category><category>60601-1-11:2010</category><category>ACCME</category><category>AECMA</category><category>AIMDD</category><category>AIMDD 90/385/EEC</category><category>ANDA</category><category>AOQ</category><category>API</category><category>ASD-STE100</category><category>ASN</category><category>ASTM</category><category>ASTM E2500-07</category><category>ASTM Subcommittee F15-48</category><category>ATI</category><category>AbCRO</category><category>Abnovo Ltd</category><category>Acento</category><category>Adam Greaves</category><category>Adam R. Shames</category><category>Agile FDA</category><category>Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld</category><category>Alan Schwartz</category><category>Albert I. Wertheimer</category><category>AlphaPoint Consulting</category><category>Amcor Rigid Plastics</category><category>Amy Maxson</category><category>Andrew Jefferson</category><category>Andrew Vaughan</category><category>Anita S. Kablinger</category><category>Anthony Eistetter</category><category>Apogee Usability Asia Ltd</category><category>Architag International</category><category>ArthroCare Asia Pacific</category><category>Arthur Kamm</category><category>Articulate</category><category>Asherman Associates</category><category>Axelrod Laliberte LLP</category><category>Axon</category><category>BAA</category><category>BBK Worldwide Alliance</category><category>BIMO</category><category>BLA</category><category>BabyCenter</category><category>Baldridge</category><category>Bayer Healthcare</category><category>Beacon Performance Group</category><category>Ben Martin</category><category>Benjamin L England</category><category>Bernard Bosley</category><category>Beth Thomas</category><category>Bethany Hills</category><category>Bid Grid</category><category>Bill Hutter</category><category>Bill Poston</category><category>Bill Rabkin</category><category>Bill White</category><category>BioStorage Technologies</category><category>Bodeux International LLC</category><category>Boston MedTech Advisors</category><category>Brand</category><category>Brazil</category><category>Brian R. Garrison</category><category>Brian Travis</category><category>Bromberg and Newman P.C</category><category>Bruce Wagman</category><category>CDM</category><category>CDRH</category><category>CE Mark</category><category>CFTC</category><category>CIA</category><category>CMDCAS</category><category>CMO</category><category>CP</category><category>CPI Hazell and Associates</category><category>CRA deployment</category><category>CRF</category><category>CSR</category><category>Callan Consulting</category><category>Capella University</category><category>Caprion Proteomics</category><category>CaridianBCT</category><category>Carsten Lund</category><category>Cary Cyr</category><category>Caryn M. Silverman</category><category>Cascade Consulting</category><category>Casey Conry</category><category>Cathy Michael</category><category>Center for the Advancement of Leadership</category><category>Chang-Hong Whitney</category><category>Charles Schneider</category><category>Chart Learning Solutions</category><category>Cheryl Hill</category><category>Chris Willis</category><category>Christian Mayer</category><category>Christine Duckworth</category><category>Christoph Stefes</category><category>Claes Strom</category><category>Clair Callan</category><category>Climate Change and Environmental Services LLC</category><category>Clinical Resolutions</category><category>Comgenesis LLC</category><category>Compliance Architects</category><category>Compliance Team Inc</category><category>Conchita Delgado</category><category>Contract In-House Counsel and Consultants LLC</category><category>Cori Annapolen Goldberg</category><category>Covance Clinical Development Services</category><category>Covance IVRS Project Management Group</category><category>Craig Trautman</category><category>Cynthia M. Shalers</category><category>D</category><category>DEA</category><category>DHR</category><category>DMF</category><category>DMR</category><category>DTC</category><category>Damien Bové</category><category>Dan McDonald</category><category>Dan O’Leary</category><category>Daniel Szuc</category><category>Danish Medical Devices Consulting</category><category>Data Conversion Laboratory</category><category>Data Conversion Laboratory (DCL)</category><category>Data cleaning</category><category>David Barr</category><category>David F. Axelrod</category><category>David Glow</category><category>David Piltz</category><category>David Rothkopf</category><category>David West</category><category>Debra Ruh</category><category>Design Science Consulting</category><category>Detert</category><category>Diamond BioPharm Limited</category><category>Diane Brown</category><category>Diego Glancszpigel</category><category>Digital Brand Expressions</category><category>Donald Palmer</category><category>Donald Swankie</category><category>Dr Pete Harpum</category><category>Dr. Alberto Grignolo</category><category>Dr. Andre van Vliet</category><category>Dr. Andrew Marr</category><category>Dr. Andrew Trammel</category><category>Dr. Anita S. Kablinger</category><category>Dr. Ann Flandermeyer</category><category>Dr. Annette Stemhagen</category><category>Dr. Bruce Jackson</category><category>Dr. Bruce MacFarlane</category><category>Dr. Carl Kraus</category><category>Dr. Christian Mayer</category><category>Dr. Christian Reh</category><category>Dr. Claes Strom</category><category>Dr. Clark Quinn</category><category>Dr. Daniel Chelsky</category><category>Dr. David Lim</category><category>Dr. Edgar Adams</category><category>Dr. Elliot Lawrence</category><category>Dr. Frans Wijma</category><category>Dr. Frederico Lerner</category><category>Dr. Gail E. Radcliffe</category><category>Dr. Gavin Edwards</category><category>Dr. Gina O&#39;Connor</category><category>Dr. Ginette Collazo</category><category>Dr. Hemendra Misra</category><category>Dr. Joachim Wilke</category><category>Dr. Johann Proeve</category><category>Dr. John Freedman</category><category>Dr. John Powers</category><category>Dr. Lionel Laroche</category><category>Dr. Maria Donawa</category><category>Dr. Maureen Graham</category><category>Dr. Max Horneck</category><category>Dr. Miguel de Soto-Perera</category><category>Dr. Mike Unwalla</category><category>Dr. Nahed Mohsen</category><category>Dr. Nick Fleischer</category><category>Dr. Patricia Hurley</category><category>Dr. Paul Hardt</category><category>Dr. Pramod Kabra</category><category>Dr. Ruth Ann Lee</category><category>Dr. Scott Oglesby</category><category>Dr. Stephen Peroutka</category><category>Dr. Steven Shaha</category><category>Dr. Sunita Ahir</category><category>Dr. Tony Lockett</category><category>Dr. Vijai Kumar</category><category>Dr. William Putnam</category><category>Dr. Zvi Ladin</category><category>Drinker Biddle and Reath LLP</category><category>Dublin Consulting</category><category>EC Directive 93/42/EEC</category><category>ECCRO</category><category>EDQM</category><category>EHR</category><category>EMR</category><category>EMS</category><category>EN 1394:2007</category><category>EOP-2</category><category>EU.Pascale Viret</category><category>EUTCD</category><category>EVA</category><category>Easthorn Clinical Services in CEE</category><category>EasyRead Writing LLC</category><category>Eclipsys Corporation</category><category>Elaine Job</category><category>Elisabethann Wright</category><category>Emergo</category><category>Emily K. Strunk</category><category>Epsilon</category><category>EquiPro</category><category>Eric Allen</category><category>Erik Vollebregt</category><category>EuP</category><category>European Diagnostics Manufacturers Association</category><category>European Union</category><category>Eve Lindemuth Bodeux</category><category>Excel Life Sciences</category><category>F. David Rothkopf</category><category>FASB</category><category>FDA Modernization Act</category><category>FDA483</category><category>FDAImports.com</category><category>FERC</category><category>FSVP</category><category>FTA</category><category>FXConferences</category><category>Faiz Kermani</category><category>Finance</category><category>Flow Assessment</category><category>Flow Formula</category><category>Foreign Corrupt Practices Act</category><category>Foriegn Corrupt Practices Act</category><category>Fort Hill Company</category><category>Frank Mark</category><category>Frank N. Laird</category><category>Frank O&#39;Roark</category><category>Freedman HealthCare</category><category>Fuerst and Ittleman</category><category>Fuld and Company</category><category>Full Spectrum Software</category><category>GAP</category><category>GEP</category><category>GFSI</category><category>GHG</category><category>Garin Hess</category><category>Gary Gamerman</category><category>Gass Weber Mullins LLC</category><category>Geoff Ott</category><category>George Brill</category><category>George Washington University School of Medicine</category><category>Ginette M. Collazo Inc.</category><category>Global Health Education Foundation</category><category>Global Pharmaceutical Services</category><category>Good Manufacturing Practices</category><category>Gordon and Rees LLP</category><category>Government Enforcement</category><category>Graciela Racaro</category><category>Greenberg Traurig LLP</category><category>Gregory F. Jenner</category><category>Guy Sohie</category><category>HAACP</category><category>HACCP</category><category>HCIL Consulting</category><category>HE 75</category><category>HERAX</category><category>HHE</category><category>HPI</category><category>HRIS</category><category>Haemonetics Corporation</category><category>Halloran Consulting Group</category><category>Harpum Consulting</category><category>Heather Almonte</category><category>Hodgson Russ</category><category>Hogan Lovells International LLP</category><category>Hogan Lovells LLP</category><category>Holland and Knight LLP</category><category>Human resource</category><category>Human resources</category><category>Hunton and Williams LLP</category><category>Hyman Phelps and McNamara</category><category>IASB</category><category>IB</category><category>IBM Business Consulting</category><category>ICD-10</category><category>ICD-9</category><category>ICH Q5E</category><category>IEC 62366</category><category>IMS Consulting Group</category><category>IOM</category><category>IP</category><category>IRO</category><category>ISO 14969</category><category>ISO 9000:2005</category><category>ISO compliance</category><category>ISO standards</category><category>ITC</category><category>Idiom</category><category>Idiom Technologies</category><category>Ilyssa Levins</category><category>Inclusion Strategies</category><category>Industrial Wisdom</category><category>Information Change Organisation</category><category>Intagras</category><category>Intentional Design Inc</category><category>Intrac Design</category><category>Ira G. Asherman</category><category>Isidra Mencos</category><category>J. Tyson and Associates</category><category>JD</category><category>JD - Lowrie Lando and Anastasi LLP</category><category>Jaap H.M. Dijkman</category><category>Jaap Laufer</category><category>Jack M. Kloeber Jr.</category><category>Jae Chung</category><category>Janet Balk</category><category>Janice Redish</category><category>Janine Kukula</category><category>Jay R. Rush</category><category>Jay Rush</category><category>Jayne Pilot</category><category>Jeanine O&#39;Neill-Blackwell</category><category>Jeffrey Gassman</category><category>Jeffrey K. Shapiro</category><category>Jennifer Hicks</category><category>Jennifer Linton</category><category>Jennifer Price</category><category>Jeremy Yung</category><category>Jerry Lanese</category><category>Jesse A. Witten</category><category>Jessica Swartz</category><category>Jill Johnston</category><category>Jim Polarine</category><category>JoAnn Tyson</category><category>Joachim Wilke</category><category>Joe Kutchera</category><category>Joel Falk</category><category>John Aggerholm</category><category>John Garvey</category><category>John Patrick Oroho</category><category>John Webster</category><category>Jost Zetzsche</category><category>KKPD</category><category>Karen A. Mullin</category><category>Karen Howes</category><category>Kate Borten</category><category>Kathleen Mandziuk</category><category>Kattina V. Barsik</category><category>Kay Bross</category><category>Kaye Scholer LLP</category><category>Keith B. Russell</category><category>Ken Carson</category><category>Kent Tholke</category><category>Kim Nelson</category><category>Kit Brown</category><category>Koumu Engineering</category><category>Kristina E. Anderson</category><category>Kromite LLC</category><category>Kyle Sampson</category><category>LCM</category><category>LMS</category><category>LS Drug Development</category><category>Lance Dublin</category><category>Lanese Group</category><category>Latitudes</category><category>Laura Raynak</category><category>Laurie Halloran</category><category>Law Offices of Michael A. Swit</category><category>LeBow College of Business</category><category>Leigh Bailey</category><category>Leonard</category><category>Leonard Fuld</category><category>Les Sparrow</category><category>Lindsay Gregory</category><category>Localization Institute</category><category>Lorna Riley</category><category>Lorraine S. DeCesare</category><category>Lynn Polgar</category><category>MAH</category><category>MDR&#39;s</category><category>MEDDEV 2.7/3</category><category>MHRA</category><category>MMG</category><category>MS</category><category>MSLs</category><category>MTA</category><category>Marc C. Sanchez</category><category>Marc Karell</category><category>Marcela Jenney</category><category>Marcus Yoder</category><category>Maria Harrison</category><category>Marie Snell</category><category>Marjorie Tharp</category><category>Mark Anderson</category><category>Mark Mansour</category><category>Marr Consultancy Limited</category><category>Mary Schwarz</category><category>Mason Holloway</category><category>Matthew Weinberg</category><category>Max Neeman International</category><category>McCormick and Company</category><category>McGuireWoods</category><category>McLennen and Fish</category><category>MeddiQuest</category><category>MediLingua BV</category><category>Media 1</category><category>Medial NL</category><category>Medical Composition Resources</category><category>Medical Simulation Corporation</category><category>Medical Tech Development and Regulations</category><category>Medical device design</category><category>Michael A. Swit</category><category>Michael Aldridge</category><category>Michael Attella</category><category>Michael E. Marion and Associates</category><category>Michael Hill</category><category>Michael Plishka</category><category>Michael Swit</category><category>Michelle Burns</category><category>Michelle D&#39;Ovidio</category><category>Mike Healy</category><category>Mike Ratcliffe</category><category>Mitchell S. Fuerst</category><category>Morris Consulting Group</category><category>Musculoskeletal Clinical Regulatory Advisors LLC</category><category>Mutual Recognition</category><category>NCA</category><category>NDA submission</category><category>NHA</category><category>NPD</category><category>NSE</category><category>Neil R. Armstrong</category><category>Nermeen Varawalla</category><category>Niki Fielding</category><category>Nikki Christison</category><category>Noel Sobelman</category><category>Nutter</category><category>OC</category><category>OFW Law PC</category><category>OOS</category><category>ORBee Consulting</category><category>OTC</category><category>OUS</category><category>Oasis Medical Solutions</category><category>Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz PC</category><category>Orphan Medicinal Products</category><category>P. Sweeten Consulting</category><category>PADER</category><category>PAL</category><category>PAREXEL</category><category>PDC</category><category>PIC/S</category><category>PMS</category><category>PPD</category><category>PPI</category><category>PPM</category><category>PR risk</category><category>PSUR</category><category>PTC</category><category>Pamela Sweeten</category><category>Patricia Carson</category><category>Patricia Connolly</category><category>Patrick Bousliman</category><category>Paul Kenny</category><category>Peggy Schrammel</category><category>Performance DNA</category><category>Peter Stein</category><category>Pharmaceutical Growth Services</category><category>Phil Guarino</category><category>Phil Triolo</category><category>Phil Triolo and Associates LC</category><category>Piller&#39;s Corporation</category><category>Pilot Performance Resources Management</category><category>Porzio</category><category>Post-ksr</category><category>Poul Schmidt-Andersen</category><category>Q10</category><category>QC</category><category>QSIT</category><category>QSN</category><category>Quality Solutions Now</category><category>Quality System Strategies LLC</category><category>Quinnovation</category><category>Quintiles Consulting</category><category>Quintiles Consulting Europe</category><category>Quintiles East Asia</category><category>R. Donnelly and Associates</category><category>R2</category><category>RAC</category><category>RAPS</category><category>REC</category><category>RFD</category><category>RMWs</category><category>ROE</category><category>RTE</category><category>RTLA</category><category>Radcliffe Consulting</category><category>Radical Innovation Research Project</category><category>Rahel Anne Bailie</category><category>Ralph W. Donnelly</category><category>Rapid Intake</category><category>Raymond Urgo</category><category>Raynak Executive Search</category><category>Rebecca Pine</category><category>Redish and Associates</category><category>Regulation 1774</category><category>Regulatory Doctor</category><category>Rendition Digital</category><category>Research and Development</category><category>Richard C. Smith</category><category>Richard Vincins</category><category>Richard van der Linden</category><category>Risk Management Consultant</category><category>Rob Davie</category><category>Robert Blakie</category><category>Robin Carter</category><category>Ronald Eisenwinter</category><category>Russia</category><category>Ruth Sherman</category><category>Ruth Sherman Associates</category><category>SAFE-BioPharma</category><category>SAFE-BioPharma Association</category><category>SDL</category><category>SEA</category><category>SEO</category><category>SPC</category><category>SPHR</category><category>STE</category><category>STERIS Corporation</category><category>SaaS</category><category>Sam Barnett</category><category>Sam DeMarco</category><category>Scandinavia</category><category>SciMed Parnters</category><category>Sedgwick</category><category>Seraphim Life Sciences Consulting LLC</category><category>Shawn K. Stevens</category><category>Sherry Reuter</category><category>Sherry Reuter and Associates</category><category>Sheva Sanders</category><category>Shufra</category><category>Signifix</category><category>Simon Andriesen</category><category>Simplified English</category><category>Six Sigma</category><category>Social Networking</category><category>Sonja Jacobsen</category><category>Soo Kim</category><category>South Korea</category><category>Statistical Outsourcing Services</category><category>Stefan Blesse</category><category>Stephen D. Terman</category><category>Sterne Kessler Goldstein and Fox</category><category>Steve Billings</category><category>Steve Coppock</category><category>Steve Lank</category><category>Steve McRoberts</category><category>Stevie Hills</category><category>Stoel Rives LLP</category><category>Street and Deinard</category><category>Studies</category><category>Sue Spencer</category><category>Susan J. Court</category><category>Susan Morris</category><category>Susan Soderholm</category><category>Suzanne O&#39;Shea</category><category>TLR</category><category>Talent</category><category>TecAccess</category><category>TechScribe</category><category>Temple University School of Pharmacy</category><category>Teresa Ptaszynska</category><category>The Bailey Group</category><category>The Learning Key</category><category>The Marblehead Group</category><category>The Polmarc Group LLC</category><category>The Talent Journey</category><category>The Word Zone</category><category>Theo Nusselder</category><category>Thierry Chignon</category><category>Thomas Packer</category><category>Tim Ruef</category><category>Tim Strauss</category><category>Todd Wulffson</category><category>Tom Kuhlmann</category><category>Tracci Gilchrist</category><category>Trados</category><category>Translation Tools Consultant</category><category>TÜV SÜD America</category><category>UL International (UK) Ltd.</category><category>USDA</category><category>USP</category><category>Ukraine</category><category>Unimed</category><category>United BioSource</category><category>United BioSource Corporation</category><category>University of Colorado Denver</category><category>University of North Carolina</category><category>University of Texas at Austin Schofol of Nursing</category><category>Urgo and Associates</category><category>Ute Berger</category><category>VOC</category><category>Valeo LLC</category><category>Validation Plus</category><category>Vanesa Castillo</category><category>Vladimir Shnaydman</category><category>WEEE</category><category>WPD</category><category>Wega Informatik AG</category><category>Wendy Willow Wark</category><category>Whitney Consulting Ltd</category><category>William Boddy</category><category>William K. Klimack</category><category>William L Ramsey</category><category>William R. Mandel</category><category>WordsWork Consulting</category><category>Wright Medical</category><category>Yuriy Zhuk</category><category>ZenStorming Solutions</category><category>absenteeism</category><category>acquisitions</category><category>active pharmaceutical ingredient</category><category>ada</category><category>advertising</category><category>affordable care act</category><category>alliance</category><category>alliance management</category><category>allocation</category><category>annex 11</category><category>audience</category><category>bacterial and mold spores</category><category>biologic</category><category>biologics</category><category>biopharmaceutical</category><category>biotechnology</category><category>brand development</category><category>brand enforcement</category><category>carbon footprint</category><category>cePartner4u</category><category>cfr</category><category>chemistry</category><category>climate change</category><category>clinic</category><category>clinical aquisition</category><category>clinical data acquistition standards harmonization</category><category>clinical investigations</category><category>clinical laboratory</category><category>clinical management</category><category>clinical monitoring</category><category>clinical plan</category><category>clinical quality</category><category>clinical translation</category><category>clinician</category><category>cloud computing</category><category>communism</category><category>comparative effectiveness research</category><category>competitiveness</category><category>complex medical devices</category><category>computer validation</category><category>conference</category><category>conflict</category><category>contractor</category><category>control factors</category><category>controls</category><category>correction action</category><category>counterfeit</category><category>country selection</category><category>course</category><category>cross-cultural</category><category>customer support</category><category>cutback</category><category>data analysis</category><category>data interpretation</category><category>data privacy</category><category>data protection</category><category>de novo</category><category>design controls</category><category>design risk</category><category>design thinking</category><category>design validation</category><category>development</category><category>device advertising</category><category>device design</category><category>diagnostics</category><category>directive 2001/83</category><category>directive 2004/23/EC</category><category>directive 2007/47/EC</category><category>directive 98/79/EC</category><category>dissemination</category><category>document design</category><category>drug enforcement administration</category><category>due diligence program</category><category>e-learning</category><category>e-submissions</category><category>earned value analysis</category><category>electronic documents</category><category>electronic informed consent</category><category>electronic labeling information</category><category>electronic medical device reporting</category><category>energy</category><category>energy technology</category><category>english</category><category>ethics</category><category>excel</category><category>fair labor standards</category><category>feasibility</category><category>federal law</category><category>federal legislation</category><category>federal regulation</category><category>federal trade commission</category><category>fmla</category><category>food and beverage</category><category>food and drug administration</category><category>food supply</category><category>genentech</category><category>germany</category><category>global markets</category><category>global research</category><category>goBalto</category><category>good program design</category><category>good reprint practices</category><category>green energy</category><category>harassment</category><category>hazard</category><category>health</category><category>health insurance</category><category>hiring</category><category>hispanic</category><category>human engineering</category><category>human error</category><category>human subject</category><category>human tissue products</category><category>ineffective training</category><category>influence</category><category>information management system</category><category>inhalation products</category><category>innovation</category><category>insurance</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>internal rate of return</category><category>international english</category><category>international web site</category><category>investigator</category><category>investigator brochure</category><category>investment</category><category>iso 19011:2002</category><category>job loss</category><category>label design</category><category>labor law</category><category>labor relation</category><category>late-phase research</category><category>latino</category><category>leadership</category><category>learning</category><category>learning style</category><category>life cycle</category><category>litigation risk</category><category>local laboratory data</category><category>locale-limiting</category><category>long term study</category><category>machine translation</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>market</category><category>marketing authorization</category><category>mdi Consultants</category><category>media</category><category>medical journal</category><category>medical market research</category><category>medical suppliers</category><category>medical writing</category><category>medicinal regulation</category><category>medicine</category><category>medicines regulation</category><category>metaphor</category><category>microsoft</category><category>molecules</category><category>multicultural</category><category>multiple sclerosis</category><category>nanotechnology</category><category>narcotics</category><category>neurological devices</category><category>non-biologic</category><category>nordic</category><category>offshoring</category><category>on-site</category><category>online</category><category>ophthalmology trials</category><category>optimizing data</category><category>outsourced data management</category><category>outsourcing</category><category>paediatric</category><category>part 11</category><category>partnerships</category><category>patent strategy</category><category>patient communication</category><category>personnel policy</category><category>pharmacodynamic</category><category>pharmacokinetic</category><category>phase IV</category><category>phi</category><category>pipeline</category><category>plain writing act</category><category>portfolio management</category><category>preclinical</category><category>press conference</category><category>prevention</category><category>preventive action</category><category>process validation</category><category>product liability claims</category><category>project expectation</category><category>project planning</category><category>quality audits</category><category>quality monitoring</category><category>quality system requirement</category><category>quality validation</category><category>quick reference guid</category><category>rapid elearning</category><category>re-examination</category><category>readability</category><category>recall</category><category>recording</category><category>registration</category><category>regulatory requirement</category><category>regulatory requirements</category><category>remote worker</category><category>reporter</category><category>reputation</category><category>requests for quotation</category><category>requirements</category><category>resources</category><category>retention</category><category>risk evaluation</category><category>risk minimization action plan</category><category>riskmap</category><category>risks</category><category>safety data</category><category>safety narratives</category><category>safety reporting</category><category>sample size</category><category>sec</category><category>section 1603</category><category>section 508</category><category>self-support</category><category>simulation</category><category>site activation</category><category>software development</category><category>software localization</category><category>software translation</category><category>software validation</category><category>somatic cell therapy</category><category>sourcing</category><category>speaking</category><category>spore contamination</category><category>stakeholder</category><category>statistics</category><category>strategic partnership</category><category>stress</category><category>stress management</category><category>substandard pharmaceuticals</category><category>succession planning</category><category>sustainability</category><category>sustainable</category><category>tax credit</category><category>technical English</category><category>technical documentation</category><category>technical leaders</category><category>technology solutions</category><category>telephone</category><category>terminology database</category><category>therapeutic</category><category>time management</category><category>tissue engineer</category><category>training model</category><category>translation provider</category><category>translation quality</category><category>union</category><category>user information</category><category>vCRO</category><category>validation</category><category>virtual</category><category>virtual teams</category><category>web design</category><category>web-based software</category><category>webinar</category><category>work</category><category>workflow tools</category><category>workplace bully</category><title>Pulse on FXConferences</title><description>Over 50,000 attendees across hundreds of companies have taken advantage of our easy-to-use audio conferences to stay abreast of a fast-changing business environment.  We specialize in Life Science conferences, along with topics relevant for HR, Marketing, Legal, and Finance professionals.  Come check out our library of past audio conferences and see what&#39;s upcoming at &lt;u&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/default.aspx&quot;&gt;FXConferences&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (ForeignExchange Translations)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>708</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-7475372623554906695</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-08-23T14:59:50.650-04:00</atom:updated><title>Deadline 2013 – Implementing an Aggregate Spend Strategy</title><description>is being presented by &lt;span id=&quot;ctl00_wpm_ShowProduct_ctl01_lblSpeaker&quot;&gt;Katherine Norris, Spectranetics &amp;amp; Kim Life, Life Compliance Solutions and airs on Tuesday, August 28th, 2012.&amp;nbsp; For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Deadline-2013-Implementing-an-Aggregate-Spend-Strategy-P1015.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Affordable Care Act has survived Supreme Court scrutiny and the physician payment sunshine provisions are set for implementation beginning in January 2013. As the timeframe for implementation narrows and final regulations still await reporting companies, pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology firms are primed to implement or refine approaches to recording, tracking, and reporting aggregate payments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While money spent, per physician, on gifts, honoraria, consulting fees, food, research, continuing medical education and clinical investigator payments will be made public at the federal level for the first time in 2014, many states have existing requirements that have provided testing grounds for methodologies over the last several years. This audio conference presentation focuses on the myriad challenges facing firms at all stages of implementation, including selecting a vendor for your reporting solution, preparing your systems and implementation, auditing and monitoring.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/08/deadline-2013-implementing-aggregate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-6319111251329760025</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-08-16T15:51:01.794-04:00</atom:updated><title>Implementing the FDA Guidance on Investigator Responsibility</title><description>is being presented by &lt;span id=&quot;ctl00_wpm_ShowProduct_ctl01_lblSpeaker&quot;&gt;Lorry Witte, RN, BA, CCRC, CCRA, Clinical Research Consultant and airs on&amp;nbsp; Wednesday, August 22nd, 2012.&amp;nbsp; For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.fxconferences.com/Implementing-the-FDA-Guidance-on-Investigator-Responsibility-P1009.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#39;s been some time since FDA released its guidance for industry on investigator responsibilities, but it remains important for investigators, study coordinators, and sponsor staff to regularly train on its content to ensure safe, high quality, efficient, and less costly clinical study conduct. With many studies, time is wasted on “cleaning up” study documentation. However, if all research staff members understand FDA’s current thinking on investigator responsibility, it becomes easier to collaborate in the subjects’ best interest and produce better study results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This audio conference is intended help investigators and sponsors avoid FDA Form 483 findings and Warning Letters, highlighting what constitutes adequate investigator supervision, appropriate task delegation and adequate study training. Our speaker provides insight and guidance to assist investigators in developing or enhancing their plans for supervision and oversight of clinical trials. After attending the presentation, sponsor staff will be able to better identify robust investigator plans and understand sponsor responsibilities described in the guidance.&lt;br /&gt;
The presentation also reviews the protection of rights, safety and welfare of study subjects by providing reasonable medical care necessitated by clinical trial participation, reasonable access to medical care, and importance of avoiding protocol violations that present unreasonable risks for subjects.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/08/implementing-fda-guidance-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-6730545033716395369</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-06-06T15:46:10.141-04:00</atom:updated><title>Self-Assessment of Human Subjects Protection Programs</title><description>is being presented by Eric Allen, Director, Office of Research Compliance, with University of North Carolina at Greensboro and airs on Wednesday, June 13th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Self-Assessment-of-Human-Subjects-Protection-Programs-P915.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes being your own worst critic is a good thing. In the case of human subjects protection programs, it can prevent your institution from devastating negative impacts if you can handle the truth. Self-assessment is one option that shows the federal government, institutional officials, and your research communities your dedication to ethics and excellence in human participant research. This dynamic presentation demonstrates how periodic self-assessment of your human research protection program can be monumentally less painful than inspections by the Office of Human Research Protection or the FDA. Our speaker addresses core components including the regulatory parameters, procedures, personnel, training, and implementation of change(s). The presentation covers practical and cost-efficient strategies to implement a self-assessment program, along with tactical approaches to avoid pitfalls.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/06/self-assessment-of-human-subjects.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-8042520936825279785</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-30T15:12:46.873-04:00</atom:updated><title>Process Capability Indices in Medical Device Manufacturing</title><description>is being presented by &lt;span id=&quot;ctl00_wpm_ShowProduct_ctl01_lblSpeaker&quot;&gt;Dan O’Leary, President, of Ombu Enterprises, 
LLC, and airs on Thursday, June 7th, 2012.&amp;nbsp; For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Process-Capability-Indices-in-Medical-Device-Manufacturing-P891.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Process capability analysis examines the inherent variability in a process, 
including the statistical distribution of the process output. When the 
measurement uses variables, data process variability is the “spread” of a 
process in statistical control. When the measurement involves attributes, 
process capability is often the proportion of nonconforming units. Often, 
process capability uses an index that relates process variability and process 
specifications.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This audio conference explains the underlying statistics of the most 
commonly used capability indices. In particular, the presentation shows how to 
use data from x-bar and R charts to calculate these process capability indices. 
With an understanding of process capability indices, the speaker then examines 
applications for medical devices. This immediately brings in the FDA QSR 
requirement to identify valid statistical techniques to control process 
capability and product characteristics. The audio conference illustrates 
applications of process capability indices in both FDA QSR and ISO 13485 systems 
using both examples and FDA Warning Letters to illustrate the issues.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/05/process-capability-indices-in-medical.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-1872662699840455178</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-15T15:31:48.969-04:00</atom:updated><title>Crisis Management for the FDA-Regulated Company</title><description>is being presented by Michael A. Swit, Esq., Special Counsel, FDA Practice, with Duane Morris LLP and airs on Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Crisis-Management-for-the-FDA-Regulated-Company-P906.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any moment, lightning can strike your FDA-regulated company. It may take the form of an unexpected serious adverse event such as a death attributed to your product, forcing you to consider a recall -- or an FDA inspection exposing severe quality issues – or a tampering incident such as J&amp;amp;J faced twice with Tylenol®. Regardless of how the crisis arises, it is vital that your company be prepared in advance to address the crisis immediately and responsibly. 

&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This audio conference looks at key issues and FDA-regulated company might face during a crisis related to products or operations regulated by FDA, and how to respond to them. Drawing on a real-life case study that directly involved the speaker – the generic drug scandal that rocked FDA and industry during the late 1980s – the presentation reviews how to be prepared for a crisis and how to respond when one arises.&lt;br /&gt;
One never expects to be struck by lightning, and if you are not prepared in advance, it likely will be too late to react in the best manner to protect not only the public health, but also to responsibly mitigate the impact on your company and all its stakeholders from employees to shareholders.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/05/crisis-management-for-fda-regulated.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-3747283593032476169</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-08T15:35:59.531-04:00</atom:updated><title>Dollars and Sense – The Cost of Quality (COQ) Model and the Bottom Line</title><description>is being presented by &lt;span id=&quot;ctl00_wpm_ShowProduct_ctl01_lblSpeaker&quot;&gt;Rene D. Massengale, President, of Global Food 
Quality Concepts, LLC and airs on Wednesday, May 16th, 2012.&amp;nbsp; For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The food and beverage industry is faced with increasing pressure to improve the 
safety and quality of products for human consumption while still maintaining a 
profitable bottom line. Successful companies understand that quality management 
is vital to successfully meeting this challenge, but how does the cost of 
quality affect the bottom line?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cost of Quality is defined as the cost associated with detecting and 
avoiding quality failures. It is the cost associated with monitoring, detecting, 
and correcting errors in manufacturing or personnel. A Cost of Quality model is 
a quality management tool that can be integrated into other quality management 
systems to better understand and track the cost of quality failure over time. It 
translates the language of quality into the language of dollars understood by 
senior management.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This audio conference presentation explores quality costs, the Cost of 
Quality (COQ) model, and how it can be used to measure the real benefit derived 
from quality management efforts. In addition, our speaker discusses how Cost of 
Quality can be used to track the impact of quality compliance and noncompliance 
on the organization’s revenues from a risk management perspective.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/05/dollars-and-sense-cost-of-quality-coq.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-8443439579349305872</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-03T15:37:53.556-04:00</atom:updated><title>Industry Update – Europe&#39;s New Pharmacovigilance Regulations</title><description>is being presented by &lt;span id=&quot;ctl00_wpm_ShowProduct_ctl01_lblSpeaker&quot;&gt;Dr. Ulrich Granzer, President, Granzer 
Regulatory Consulting &amp;amp; Services and airs on Tuesday, May 15th, 2012.&amp;nbsp; For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Industry-Update-Europes-New-Pharmacovigilance-Regulations-P898.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU parliament and the EU Council have issued a new pharmacovigilance 
regulation, which will come into force in July. The legislation defines new and 
additional tasks and responsibilities for the Coordination Group, defines a new 
“urgent union procedure” for pharmacovigilance, and also provides a definition 
for post authorization safety and efficacy studies and how these new tasks are 
to be performed. For this particular set of tasks a new body is being 
established, called PRAC, which will perform safety evaluations. Opinions of the 
PRAC will then be adopted by the EMA or, in the case of older or national 
registrations, the Coordination Group for the Decentralized and the Mutual 
recognition procedure, the CMDh. This new system will be in charge of all 
critical pharmacovigilance items and issues.
&lt;br /&gt;
In this audio conference presentation, our speaker discusses these new 
changes to the EU pharmacovigilance rules, as well as potential critical issues 
arising from the EU’s complexity and decision-making process.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/05/industry-update-europes-new.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-1801603767442294268</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-02T15:30:27.881-04:00</atom:updated><title>HFE Usability Testing: Medical Device Industry Panel</title><description>is being presented by &lt;span id=&quot;ctl00_wpm_ShowProduct_ctl01_lblSpeaker&quot;&gt;Maria Shepherd &amp;amp; Kathleen 
Whanger, President &amp;amp; Senior Quality Engineer, with Data Decision Group &amp;amp; Boston Scientific and airs on Thursday, May 10th, 2012.&amp;nbsp; For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff - 
Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Optimize Medical Device 
Design was released by the FDA in June, 2011. It states that, as part of design 
control, manufacturers must conduct a risk analysis to assess/mitigate risks 
associated with device use. In addition, the FDA expects the manufacturer will 
perform human factors engineering and usability testing as a part of the product 
development process.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FDA takes these human factors requirements seriously, requiring a 
systematic assessment that incorporates usability testing to determine how the 
device will be used, the environment in which it will be used, and existing 
use-related hazards. Under these circumstances, manufacturers should provide FDA 
with a report that summarizes the human factors processes, evaluations, and 
results of validation testing as part of their pre-market applications or 
submission.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/05/hfe-usability-testing-medical-device.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-4875804355089141782</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-01T15:13:27.696-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Anabel Pérez</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">EMA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ForeignExchange Translations</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">translation</category><title>Meeting the Linguistic Requirements for EMA Submissions</title><description>is being presented by Anabel Pérez, Senior Project Manager, with ForeignExchange Translations and airs on Wednesday, May 9th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Translating product information documents in preparation for an EMA submission can be a frustrating, complex and lengthy process for both pharmaceutical companies and their translation providers. However, by establishing and maintaining communication from the start of the project, and by working together to establish realistic timelines and achievable milestones, many of the common headaches can be avoided.

&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this audio conference presentation, our speaker outlines the pain points often encountered when translating for an EMA submission, and proposes solutions, innovations and best practices that will allow client and supplier to work together collaboratively to meet all the EMA requirements, and make for a smoother submission.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/05/meeting-linguistic-requirements-for-ema.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-1329776066481423158</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-25T15:11:00.595-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">biomarker</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BioStorage Technologies</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cathy Michael</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kathleen Mandziuk</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PRA</category><title>From Site to Sample: Considerations for Effective Minimal Risk Diagnostic Research</title><description>is being presented by Kathleen Mandziuk &amp; Cathy Michael, Scientific Affairs Director &amp; Senior Director of Comprehensive Solutions, with PRA &amp; BioStorage Technologies and airs on Thursday, May 3rd, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/From-Site-to-Sample-Considerations-for-Effective-Minimal-Risk-Diagnostic-Research-P876.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;*PRA is sponsoring this event, making it complimentary for all registered attendees. Please register for this event, and submit complete attendee information once you&#39;ve registered, so we can assure you a space in the webinar. Incomplete registrations will not be honored. Please register each line for your group separately.*&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Webinar highlights&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The exponential increase of discovery, validation and commercialization of diagnostic and companion biomarkers has lead to a greater need for effective, efficient and proven research methods. Many industry experts focus on processing biological samples – however, what happens beforehand to ensure high-quality samples and data is collected?.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This educational webinar will focus on the evolving space of biomarker research and established techniques for cost-effective high-quality execution strategies. The speaker will cover a wide variety of topics from various industry perspectives.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/from-site-to-sample-considerations-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-5143692619529037172</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-24T15:11:00.129-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cheryl Hill</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IDE</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pleiad</category><title>What&#39;s New with Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE)?</title><description>is being presented by Cheryl Hill, Regulatory Manager, with Pleiad Inc. and airs on Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Whats-New-with-Investigational-Device-Exemptions-IDE-P871.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is the IDE program changing? Over the past 12 months FDA has released several proposed rules, final rules, draft guidances and final guidance documents. Some of these documents have an immediate impact on the IDE program, such as the final rule regarding Informed Consent Elements. This rule mandates that for all applicable device (or drug/biologic) clinical trials, informed consent documents and processes include a specific statement that the clinical trial information will be entered into a databank – with a compliance date of March 2012. Other documents, such as the draft guidance FDA Decisions for Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Clinical Investigations, which explains all possible decision outcomes of an IDE submission, provide insight into the IDE program and Agency expectations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This audio conference presentation provides an overview of these documents, as our speaker explains their impact on IDE regulations and offers suggestions for compliance.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/whats-new-with-investigational-device.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-2901046321513898384</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-23T15:11:00.113-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FSMA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">P. Sweeten Consulting</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pamela Sweeten</category><title>FSMA and Traceability – Complying With FDA&#39;s New Requirements</title><description>is being presented by Pamela Sweeten, Principal, of P. Sweeten Consulting and airs on Tuesday, May 1st, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/FSMA-and-Traceability-Complying-With-FDAs-New-Requirements-P874.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the traceability provisions of the Food Safety Modernization Act, food producers, manufacturers and distributors must be able to provide FDA with all of the data necessary data to facilitate a product recall with as little as four hours notice. So what does this mean in practical terms? How should your company go about capturing and storing all that data?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This timely audio conference presentation looks at what FDA will require from growers, packers, processors and shippers to accurately track processes, and what specific issues are likely to arise based on these new rules in a real-world context. Our speaker provides attendees with valuable insight into which changes should be of most concern, what they can expect in the coming months, and how best to prepare.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/fsma-and-traceability-complying-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-4607909660738045286</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-20T15:11:01.018-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Allison Fitzpatrick</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Davis and Gilbert LLP</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FTC</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Laura J. Protzmann</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PR risk</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">social media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Dannon Company</category><title>Managing Legal and PR Risks in Social Media</title><description>is being presented by Allison Fitzpatrick &amp; Laura J. Protzmann, Partner &amp; Counsel, of Davis &amp; Gilbert LLP &amp; The Dannon Company, Inc. and airs on Thursday, April 26th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Managing-Legal-and-PR-Risks-in-Social-Media-P864.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With the explosion of social media has come a significant increase in the level of regulatory scrutiny, making it imperative to put in place policies and practices compliant with applicable laws. This audio conference presentation discusses the rules that apply to social media, and what you need to do to comply with the law, including the FTC endorsement guides.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our speakers also address the legal and PR issues that arise when marketers, their employees, bloggers, affiliates and spokespersons fail to comply with FTC endorsement guides. The presentation explains why it is so important to have a social media policy, and what should be included in that policy. Lastly, the speakers also discuss what rules apply when conducting a promotion using social media, including Facebook and Twitter.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/managing-legal-and-pr-risks-in-social.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-820487813223242325</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-19T15:11:00.500-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Contract In-House Counsel and Consultants LLC</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FSMA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FSVP</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Marc C. Sanchez</category><title>The Foreign Supplier Verification Program and What It Means for the Food Industry</title><description>is being presented by Marc C. Sanchez, Regulatory Counsel, with Contract In-House Counsel and Consultants, LLC and airs on Wednesday, April 25th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/The-Foreign-Supplier-Verification-Program-and-What-It-Means-for-the-Food-Industry-P852.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) automatically takes effect in 2013 under the terms of the Food Safety Modernization Act. Congress had set a one-year deadline of January 4, 2012 for the FDA to publish details on how it will regulate imported foods. This includes verifying foreign suppliers, a definition of high-risk foods, and a certification process. While the FDA missed that deadline, it has promised a rule and guidelines soon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the meantime, the FSMA makes it clear that the foreign supplier verification program will become mandatory in 2013, whether a rule is in place or not. In this audio conference presentation, our speaker provides an overview of the FSVP, looks at the likely FDA definition of high-risk foods, and what is likely to be the certification process. The presentation also provides advice on how to cope with compliance when the FDA lags behind in rulemaking.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/foreign-supplier-verification-program.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-3497944887946677264</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-18T15:11:29.728-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Asia Pacific Bio Intelligence</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">China</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">medical devices</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">reimbursement</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Seth J. Goldenberg</category><title>Medical Device Reimbursement in China</title><description>is being presented by Seth J. Goldenberg, President, of Asia Pacific Bio Intelligence and airs on Tuesday, April 24th, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Medical-Device-Reimbursement-in-China-P860.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers have been facing increasing downward pressure on their products because of pricing regulations in China. It has become increasingly important to not only understand how to get your product through the regulatory approval process in China, but also how to get the price you want in China&#39;s rapidly evolving healthcare landscape.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This audio conference presentation provides attendees with an overview of the healthcare system in China, and how imported medical devices are viewed and treated under the Chinese insurance system. Our speaker discusses device reimbursement policies at the local and national levels, and reviews some recent developments in that regard.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/medical-device-reimbursement-in-china.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-3891206459576913921</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-16T15:41:41.304-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Agile FDA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Janet Balk</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">medical devices</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">software development</category><title>Agile Software Development in the Medical Device Industry</title><description>is being presented by Janet Balk, Principal, with Agile FDA and airs on Thursday, April 19th, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Agile-Software-Development-in-the-Medical-Device-Industry-P853.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Decreasing development timelines and getting products to market faster benefits both patients and health care providers and is obviously a priority for any company. However, when a medical device company embraces agile software development to accomplish this goal, there are common pitfalls that can be counter-productive and might actually delay getting your product out the door. What&#39;s more, introducing agile methodology can create tension between those working in quality, regulatory affairs and R&amp;D. This audio conference presentation demonstrates how to avoid the most common pitfalls, how to ensure compliance with agile development, and how to strengthen the agile process and make it a win-win for departments with differing priorities.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/agile-software-development-in-medical.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-3093552703244159950</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-11T15:51:56.176-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dan O’Leary</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ombu Enterprises</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">QSIT</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">quality audits</category><title>Developing a Sampling Plan for Quality Audits</title><description>is being presented by Dan O’Leary, President, of Ombu Enterprises, LLC and airs on Thursday, April 19th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Developing-a-Sampling-Plan-for-Quality-Audits-P849.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quality audits typically involve sampling of records and other documents. When the auditor does this a lot of questions come up, such as how many records to sample and how many nonconforming records are too many. In fact, there is a more fundamental question about nonconforming records. If a record has, say, three errors does the auditor count it three times – once for each error – or just once, as a nonconforming record? Some auditors determine the sample size without using statistical techniques. Is this ever acceptable? Sampling records in an audit is not the same as sampling at incoming inspection; the underlying assumptions are different, so the methods need to change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This audio conference examines the issues in audit sampling and provides the answers you need to plan your audit. Participants learn the difference between counting nonconformities and counting nonconformances and which techniques to apply in a quality audit. An audit may need to determine the error rate in a process, or least show that it is not too great. Attendees learn some standard sampling plans as well the reason they work. As an example, participants will analyze the sampling plans the FDA uses as part of the Quality System Technique (QSIT)</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/developing-sampling-plan-for-quality.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-6740145379397740288</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-09T15:50:30.943-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dr. Joy Frestedt</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">EU</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Frestedt Incorporated</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GCP</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IB</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">investigator brochure</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">mdd</category><title>Investigator Brochures for Medical Devices</title><description>is being presented by Dr. Joy Frestedt, President &amp; CEO, of Frestedt Incorporated and airs on Wednesday, April 18th, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Investigator-Brochures-for-Medical-Devices-P859.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An investigator&#39;s brochure (IB) is required for compliance with the EU Medical Device Directives (e.g. 2.7.2) and also with ISO 14155: Clinical Investigations of Medical Devices in Human Subjects – Good Clinical Practices. The development of an IB for medical devices should reflect the engineering features of the device, in much the same way that an IB for pharmaceutical agents reflects the chemical features of the drug. As a dynamic document, the IB must be carefully constructed and, ideally, it should accurately represent the current state of all knowledge about the investigational product – including information about AEs, SAEs, and important manufacturing details as well as nonclinical and clinical study results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This audio conference presentation provides an overview and best practices for the medical device IB, looking at some of the related issues specific to devices and discussing how the brochure is likely to evolve over time.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/investigator-brochures-for-medical.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-4078018242926471137</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-02T14:32:46.224-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clinical trial</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dr. Nermeen Varawalla</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ECCRO</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">India</category><title>Best Practices for Conducting Clinical Trials in Emerging Countries</title><description>is being presented by Dr. Nermeen Varawalla, CEO, of ECCRO and airs on Tuesday, April 17th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Best-Practices-for-Conducting-Clinical-Trials-in-Emerging-Countries-P835.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The value of emerging countries in delivering cost-effective patient recruitment is well documented. However concerns remain about data quality, GCP compliance, extrapolation of trial outcomes and regulatory hurdles. These concerns often can be addressed by combining an understanding of international clinical trial requirements and local expertise.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our speaker for this event is Dr. Nermeen Varawalla, a reknowned expert on the conduct of clinical studies in emerging markets in general, and India in particular. In this presentation she discusses how to take things one step further by customizing industry best practices for the emerging clinical trial environment. These include the formation of select investigator networks, integrated site management and data-driven, hybrid monitoring. In this presentation, Dr. Varawalla shares case studies highlighting her work in India to illustrate the effectiveness of these practices in overcoming typical concerns about conducting clinical research in emerging countries.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/best-practices-for-conducting-clinical.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-7301859089527847665</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-02T14:30:41.640-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Beverly H. Lorell</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">King and Spalding LLP</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Marian J. Lee</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">off-label</category><title>FDA Update – Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Information</title><description>is being presented by Marian J. Lee &amp; Beverly H. Lorell, Partner &amp; Senior Advisor, with King &amp; Spalding LLP and airs on Thursday, April 12th, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/FDA-Update-Responding-to-Unsolicited-Requests-for-Off-Label-Information-P825.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FDA recently released a significant draft guidance on how manufacturers and distributors of drugs and medical devices may respond to unsolicited requests for information about off-label uses of their products. This audio conference presentation analyzes the far-reaching implications of that new guidance for company practices and procedures regarding these scientific communications, and also what it means for the use of off-label promotion as the basis for enforcement action by FDA and other federal authorities. Our speakers examine the impact of the agency&#39;s newly defined distinctions between solicited and unsolicited requests for information, and non-public and public information requests, including those requests arising in emerging electronic media. The presentation focuses on providing practical tips and pitfalls to avoid in implementing this new draft guidance.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/04/fda-update-responding-to-unsolicited.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-1005658364649683783</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-30T15:39:59.912-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">design validation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GE Healthcare</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sample size</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Steven Walfish</category><title>Sample Size for Design Verification and Validation</title><description>is being presented by Steven Walfish, Statistician, with GE Healthcare and airs on Wednesday, April 4th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Sample-Size-for-Design-Verification-and-Validation-P728.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Design controls are an interrelated set of practices and procedures that are incorporated into the design and development process for medical devices to ensure that the completed design that is transferred to production is appropriate for its intended use. The goal of this presentation is to understand the requirements and statistical techniques involved in the design controls process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This audio conference looks at the types of requirements that lend themselves to statistics in verification and validation. Our speaker also covers the relationship between risk and sample size. Participants gain a fundamental knowledge for determining sample size in statistical testing, while understanding how variance in the population can impact the sample size necessary to establish objective evidence.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/03/sample-size-for-design-verification-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-8920203206593866558</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-29T16:25:19.929-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Arrastia and Capote LLP</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lisa Capote</category><title>Avoiding and Responding to FDA Import Alerts</title><description>is being presented by Lisa Capote, Partner, with Arrastia &amp; Capote LLP and airs on Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Avoiding-and-Responding-to-FDA-Import-Alerts-P848.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When companies, products or geographical regions are added to import alerts, also known as detention without physical examination, you can rest assured you are not getting through the US border without some additional effort on your part. At the point in time one of your products is listed on an import alert the product is automatically detained by FDA with assistance of Customs and Border Protection and it is your obligation to convince FDA that your product complies with the regulations. If the evidence you provide FDA is insufficient to merit release, the product will be refused entry. The process of having the product detained while you plead with FDA for a release can result in increased costs to the importer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This audio conference presentation provides detail on FDA’s import alert process, and looks at the factors that result in facilities or their products being placed on import alert. Our speaker shares insight on proactive steps you can take to avoid this “blacklist” as well as some best practices to follow to be removed from import alert.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/03/avoiding-and-responding-to-fda-import.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-4602511655188427992</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-26T14:35:41.224-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Eric Allen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">human subject</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">University of North Carolina</category><title>Human Subject Protection Programs - Analyzing the New Proposed Regulations</title><description>is being presented by Eric Allen, Director, Office of Research Compliance, with University of North Carolina at Greensboro and airs on Thursday, March 29th, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Human-Subject-Protection-Programs-Analyzing-the-New-Proposed-Regulations-P842.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the first time in more than 20 years, the Office of Human Research Protections is reviewing the federal regulations governing protection of human subjects. It will be the first substantive change to these regulations since 1991, and the potential impact will affect all individuals who are currently involved in human subject research and those who plan to be in the future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, this is a much-needed document for the human subject research community. There are a few areas in particular that will be improved by this new legislation, such as regularly updated expedited review categories and improved accountability for research as a whole. However, the majority of the changes provide great concern for investigators, IRBs, institutional officials, potential research subjects, and regulatory compliance administrators, as the revisions will drastically alter the way research is conducted, reviewed, and perceived by the general public.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this audio conference presentation, our speaker analyzes the newly proposed human subject regulations in the context of their current state, highlighting significant changes and pointing out critical concerns and areas that need further clarification.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/03/human-subject-protection-programs.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-4633333298158112643</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-23T15:27:05.306-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Directive 90/385/EEC</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Directive 93/42/EEC</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">e-labeling</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">EU</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Michor Consulting EU</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Salma Michor</category><title>eLabeling Medical Devices for the EU Market</title><description>is being presented by Salma Michor, CEO and Principal Consultant, of Michor Consulting EU and airs on Wednesday, March 28th, 2012.  For more details or to register, please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/eLabeling-Medical-Devices-for-the-EU-Market-P597.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Medical device labeling in the EU continues to pose a challenge for manufacturers, who must create compliant Instructions for Use in all required languages. The term &quot;e-labeling&quot; refers to innovative means for providing Instructions for Use in an electronic format for medical devices. Originally e-labeling focused on IVDs, since these are usually used by healthcare professionals in a clinical environment, however, the latest proposed revisions to Directive 93/42/EEC and Directive 90/385/EEC introduce amendments pivotal for e-labeling for other devices.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In order to set up an e-labeling system, companies must develop and implement internal controls and procedures that promote adherence to regulatory requirements including applicable statutes, laws, regulations and directives. e-labelling provides several advantages in managing regulatory compliance but also poses some challenges. In this audio conference, we look at some of the labeling-related compliance issues faced by medical device manufacturers and the advantages of using e-labeling to gain competitive advantage.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/03/elabeling-medical-devices-for-eu-market.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7839647992363879611.post-7083619844903435610</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-20T15:14:40.768-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dr. David Lim</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fda</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GCP</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Regulatory Doctor</category><title>Establishing Effective and FDA-Compliant Good Clinical Practices (GCP)</title><description>is being presented by Dr. David Lim, Founder, of Regulatory Doctor and airs on Tuesday, March 27th, 2012.  For more details, or to register please visit our site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxconferences.com/Establishing-Effective-and-FDA-Compliant-Good-Clinical-Practices-GCP-P829.aspx&quot;&gt;www.fxconferences.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the United States, scientific studies designed to develop evidence to support the safety and effectiveness of investigational drugs, biological products and medical devices (including in vitro diagnostic devices) are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Those conducting these clinical studies – such as clinical investigators, sponsors, monitors, and CROs – must comply with the applicable statutes and regulations governing good clinical practice (GCP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This audio conference presentation is intended to provide attendees with a detailed review and understanding of the FDA regulations applicable for clinical trials or studies, and requirements for compliance. Our speaker drawns upon extensive industry experience and shares insight on the various aspects of GCP, empowering attendees with the key information they need regarding FDA regulations and requirements.</description><link>http://fxconferences.blogspot.com/2012/03/establishing-effective-and-fda.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>