<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;D0EFRHwyfCp7ImA9WhRRFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593</id><updated>2011-11-27T15:13:35.294-08:00</updated><category term="Proof Contest" /><title>QUANTOMANIA</title><subtitle type="html" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>24</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Quantomania" /><feedburner:info uri="quantomania" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYHR3k-fyp7ImA9WhdRE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-8260013857260089961</id><published>2011-08-02T12:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-08-02T12:25:36.757-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-02T12:25:36.757-07:00</app:edited><title>Last Non Zero Digit Of a factorial</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/8260013857260089961/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2011/08/last-non-zero-digit-of-factorial.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8260013857260089961?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8260013857260089961?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/ZPv3j5FOr_c/last-non-zero-digit-of-factorial.html" title="Last Non Zero Digit Of a factorial" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">This is an oft repeated concept in different examinations but if you can grasp the following algorithm solving problems is a one min task
Concept
Lets say D(N) denotes the last non zero digit of factorial, then the algo saysD(N)=4*D[N/5]*D(Unit digit of N)[If tens digit of N is odd]D(N)=6*D[N/5]*D(Unit digit of N)[If tens digit of N is even]; Where [N/5] is greatest Integer Function
#Problem 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V7mhvFHL6DZZqEVqnrnF0ImKMYE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V7mhvFHL6DZZqEVqnrnF0ImKMYE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V7mhvFHL6DZZqEVqnrnF0ImKMYE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V7mhvFHL6DZZqEVqnrnF0ImKMYE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/ZPv3j5FOr_c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2011/08/last-non-zero-digit-of-factorial.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8NR3c-eSp7ImA9WhdSGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-176137548981233295</id><published>2011-07-27T22:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-07-27T22:28:16.951-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-07-27T22:28:16.951-07:00</app:edited><title>After One Year</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/176137548981233295/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2011/07/after-one-year.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/176137548981233295?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/176137548981233295?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/0Reh5JKhcLo/after-one-year.html" title="After One Year" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 17
If a,b,c,d are positive real numbers then find a possible value of a/(a+b+d)+ b/(b+c+a) + c/(b+c+d) + d/(a+c+d)(a)11/5 (b)17/3 (c)2 (d)11/9
Solution Scheme And Approach: 

a/(a+b+d)+ b/(b+c+a) + c/(b+c+d) + d/(a+c+d)&amp;gt;a/(a+b+d+c)+ b/(b+c+a+d) + c/(b+c+d+a) + d/(a+c+d+b)=1a/(a+b+d)+ b/(b+c+a) + c/(b+c+d) + d/(a+c+d)&amp;lt;a/(a+b)+ b/(a+b)+ c/(c+d)+ d/(c+d) =2Hence the range of the expression 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VOdqZPHRD__uwM4MgNe-xaVhusM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VOdqZPHRD__uwM4MgNe-xaVhusM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VOdqZPHRD__uwM4MgNe-xaVhusM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VOdqZPHRD__uwM4MgNe-xaVhusM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/0Reh5JKhcLo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2011/07/after-one-year.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE4EQ3g8fCp7ImA9WxFSE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-1313565440705898372</id><published>2010-04-15T01:19:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-04-15T02:15:02.674-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-04-15T02:15:02.674-07:00</app:edited><title>Digital root</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/1313565440705898372/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/04/problem-15-prove-any-perfect-number.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/1313565440705898372?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/1313565440705898372?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/FqhgysQlX1s/problem-15-prove-any-perfect-number.html" title="Digital root" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
&amp;lt;!--
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{mso-style-parent:"";
	margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:20.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	vertical-align:sub;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
	mso-header-margin:.5in;
	
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AHpOFJhZoG0BQY90o05_7NkE2JU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AHpOFJhZoG0BQY90o05_7NkE2JU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AHpOFJhZoG0BQY90o05_7NkE2JU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AHpOFJhZoG0BQY90o05_7NkE2JU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/FqhgysQlX1s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/04/problem-15-prove-any-perfect-number.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQBQHk-eip7ImA9WxFSEko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-8919590849436882955</id><published>2010-04-14T12:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-04-14T12:29:11.752-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-04-14T12:29:11.752-07:00</app:edited><title>Breaking a long overdue</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/8919590849436882955/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/04/breaking-long-overdue.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8919590849436882955?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8919590849436882955?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/oCnqeaqxHDs/breaking-long-overdue.html" title="Breaking a long overdue" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 15
Find the total number of solutions of | [x] - 2x |=4.
(a)1,(b)2,(c)4,(d)6,(e)None of these [Where [x] is Greatest Int Func]
Solution scheme and approach:
Case 1 :( x is a whole number)
so [x]=x
=&amp;gt;|-x|=4 =&amp;gt;x=4 or x=-4
Case 2: ( x is a fraction)
so x=a+f (f is the fractional portion)
then the equation gets converted into
|a-(2a+2f)|=4
=&amp;gt;|-a-2f|=4
=&amp;gt;a=4-2f =&amp;gt;a=3 (when f=1/2) =&amp;gt;x=3.5
or a
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2juAiE9_DbJNMy-BltVsFvmxC8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2juAiE9_DbJNMy-BltVsFvmxC8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2juAiE9_DbJNMy-BltVsFvmxC8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A2juAiE9_DbJNMy-BltVsFvmxC8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/oCnqeaqxHDs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/04/breaking-long-overdue.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0IEQ3w4fip7ImA9WxBUEkQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-609379213955187009</id><published>2010-02-27T10:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-27T10:31:42.236-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-27T10:31:42.236-08:00</app:edited><title>Polynomial</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/609379213955187009/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/polynomial.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/609379213955187009?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/609379213955187009?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/72Oqe6Os8kw/polynomial.html" title="Polynomial" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 14
Let f be a polynomial of degree 98, such that f(k)=1/k. [k=1,2,3,4...99]. Find the value of f(100).[USAMath Talent Search 2009]Solution scheme and approach
Consider a function g(k) such that 
g(k)=kf(k)-1
As f(k) is a polynomial of deg 98 g(k) should be a polynomial of deg 99.
=&amp;gt;g(k)=C*(k-1)*(k-2)*(k-3)*...*(k-99)
=&amp;gt;kf(k)-1=C*(k-1)*(k-2)*(k-3)*...*(k-99)............(1) 
by putting k=0
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JdoV-j1ZAnu_FUf0ozjqkwSVzUY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JdoV-j1ZAnu_FUf0ozjqkwSVzUY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JdoV-j1ZAnu_FUf0ozjqkwSVzUY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JdoV-j1ZAnu_FUf0ozjqkwSVzUY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/72Oqe6Os8kw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/polynomial.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUFRHY9cCp7ImA9WxBVEU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-5035109438138570942</id><published>2010-02-11T04:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-14T01:03:35.868-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-14T01:03:35.868-08:00</app:edited><title>Number Of Solutions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/5035109438138570942/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/number-of-solutions.html#comment-form" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/5035109438138570942?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/5035109438138570942?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/eOmUWQtdcAE/number-of-solutions.html" title="Number Of Solutions" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>3</thr:total><content type="html">This is a typical pattern. If you can remember different formats of this specific problem, cracking questions is just a matter of few seconds. Let's have a look.

#Problem 13.1
Let n ≥ 1 be an integer and let t denote the number of positive integer divisors of n^2. Show
that the number of positive integer solutions (a, b) of the equation 1/a−1/b = 1/n is precisely
equal to (t − 1)/2.Solution 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SoChdZBvO4uViU6gHCbZyPblz48/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SoChdZBvO4uViU6gHCbZyPblz48/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SoChdZBvO4uViU6gHCbZyPblz48/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SoChdZBvO4uViU6gHCbZyPblz48/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/eOmUWQtdcAE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/number-of-solutions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUACRn87fSp7ImA9WxBWF08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-6821061751425446623</id><published>2010-02-09T05:33:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-09T05:56:07.105-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-09T05:56:07.105-08:00</app:edited><title>Powered Modulo</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/6821061751425446623/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/powered-modulo.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6821061751425446623?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6821061751425446623?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/C55om3swz9I/powered-modulo.html" title="Powered Modulo" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">When we need to calculate the modulus (or remainder) of a nth powered number, we have to find out out the pattern. 

#Problem 12.1
if a^2+b^2 is a multiple of 7^2009 then prove that ab is a multiple of 7^2010.[USA Math Talent Search]
 Solution scheme and approach
a^2+b^2=7^2009*k 
As right hand side is divisible by 7 left hand should be divisible by 7.
Now we can deduce the the following table 

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ugq49be0q3cVT0-M8cJu6X10b9k/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ugq49be0q3cVT0-M8cJu6X10b9k/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ugq49be0q3cVT0-M8cJu6X10b9k/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ugq49be0q3cVT0-M8cJu6X10b9k/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/C55om3swz9I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/powered-modulo.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkAERn0yeip7ImA9WxBWFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-697342311824612152</id><published>2010-02-01T08:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-05T22:45:07.392-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-05T22:45:07.392-08:00</app:edited><title>CAT CLASSIC : Number Theory</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/697342311824612152/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/cat-classic-number-theory.html#comment-form" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/697342311824612152?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/697342311824612152?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/G2v-xrFIdhQ/cat-classic-number-theory.html" title="CAT CLASSIC : Number Theory" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>5</thr:total><content type="html">Today I talked to one of my Pagalguy friend. He was right in saying that my blog is not good for all. I agree. What I try to discuss, here, is obviously not for all and sometimes the concept becomes too tough to understand. And there are a lot of people who are unable to attend coaching classes due to different reasons. So being a pagalguy member I should help them. And if this section can help 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QIGBZsA9wT1CGAx3aM5fDEhyYy8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QIGBZsA9wT1CGAx3aM5fDEhyYy8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QIGBZsA9wT1CGAx3aM5fDEhyYy8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QIGBZsA9wT1CGAx3aM5fDEhyYy8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/G2v-xrFIdhQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/02/cat-classic-number-theory.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04FR3s9eSp7ImA9WxBWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-3091599089780308564</id><published>2010-01-31T22:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-31T22:31:56.561-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-31T22:31:56.561-08:00</app:edited><title>Concept 3: CATLAN numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/3091599089780308564/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/concept-3-catlan-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/3091599089780308564?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/3091599089780308564?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/-lgjA4hzAQI/concept-3-catlan-numbers.html" title="Concept 3: CATLAN numbers" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Can you tell me what is the next number of this series?
1,2,5,14,42,?

You may face trouble in finding though. But here is the formula
Tn=1/(n+1)*2nCn=(2n)!/[(n+1)!*n!] [For n&amp;gt;=1]
So T5=132.
The number of this series is popularly known as CATLAN numbers. And in different counting problems. I will try to explore some of them.

(A)Mountain Ranges and Diagonal Avoiding Paths

(i)How many mountain 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HWi01hXxvspDxVJ9bViP-ZaZG-s/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HWi01hXxvspDxVJ9bViP-ZaZG-s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HWi01hXxvspDxVJ9bViP-ZaZG-s/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HWi01hXxvspDxVJ9bViP-ZaZG-s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/-lgjA4hzAQI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/concept-3-catlan-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMMQ38zeCp7ImA9WxBXGUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-1189237297094690801</id><published>2010-01-15T09:53:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-31T09:04:42.180-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-31T09:04:42.180-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Proof Contest" /><title>Again a perfect square</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/1189237297094690801/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/again-perfect-square.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/1189237297094690801?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/1189237297094690801?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/P0ms9oPlnIo/again-perfect-square.html" title="Again a perfect square" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem11
49=7^24489=67^2444889=667^2............................Now prove that if we insert 48 in the middle of the previous term of this series, like this way, in each case it will produce a perfect square.

Solution scheme and approach 
Number is in this format 
[4444...4](n+1 numbers)[8888...8](n numbers)9
So we can write the number in the following way
[4*10^(2n+1)+4*10^2n+4*10^(2n-1)+....4
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pelqonBjfATCuUz3AzvorSLfCl4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pelqonBjfATCuUz3AzvorSLfCl4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pelqonBjfATCuUz3AzvorSLfCl4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pelqonBjfATCuUz3AzvorSLfCl4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/P0ms9oPlnIo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/again-perfect-square.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE8ER346fyp7ImA9WxBQFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-8227029922825994098</id><published>2010-01-15T09:26:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-15T09:33:26.017-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-15T09:33:26.017-08:00</app:edited><title>CAT SHOT-1</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/8227029922825994098/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/cat-shot-1.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8227029922825994098?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8227029922825994098?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/oG9WafIrP8g/cat-shot-1.html" title="CAT SHOT-1" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">This section is dedicated to CAT. Here we deal with the problems which often appears in mocks and actual cat as well.Fasten your belt. Here we go.

(1)2^y+2*(3^y)&amp;gt;3*(4^y) and y=3x^2+2x-2
Which of the following is a possible value of x?
(a)-1.5 (b)-2.5 (c)-0.5 (d)0.7 (e)1.2

(2)For N values of t, where t&amp;lt;=250, the highest power of t in t! is t^5. Then which of the following is true? (a)N&amp;lt;=4 (b)N=6
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PjoLe34jQSAMsZVmtFBSNby0YKk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PjoLe34jQSAMsZVmtFBSNby0YKk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PjoLe34jQSAMsZVmtFBSNby0YKk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PjoLe34jQSAMsZVmtFBSNby0YKk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/oG9WafIrP8g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/cat-shot-1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUMRHc4eCp7ImA9WxBQFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-6924378004965057914</id><published>2010-01-14T16:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-15T01:21:25.930-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-15T01:21:25.930-08:00</app:edited><title>Concept 2:Diophantine Equations</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/6924378004965057914/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/concept-2diophantine-equations.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6924378004965057914?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6924378004965057914?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/at52Zqib6js/concept-2diophantine-equations.html" title="Concept 2:Diophantine Equations" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">Diophantine equation is an equation of polynomials where variables are integers only. 

Linear Diophantine Equation


from the name it's clear that it's an equation of degree 1. 
ax+by=g.c.d.(a,b)=d ...(I)
is also an linear Diophantine equation.According to Bézout's identity if equation number (I) holds true.i.e. gcd(a,b)=d satisfies then, there should be an integer solution of this equation.It's
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0qDAiPTBVOFHfxnVNvxeqkVWPbI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0qDAiPTBVOFHfxnVNvxeqkVWPbI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0qDAiPTBVOFHfxnVNvxeqkVWPbI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0qDAiPTBVOFHfxnVNvxeqkVWPbI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/at52Zqib6js" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/concept-2diophantine-equations.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEYBSXkyfyp7ImA9WxBQFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-3257898672113312528</id><published>2010-01-14T11:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-15T09:22:38.797-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-15T09:22:38.797-08:00</app:edited><title>Infinite primes</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/3257898672113312528/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/infinite-primes.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/3257898672113312528?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/3257898672113312528?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/ke7UzI4hSes/infinite-primes.html" title="Infinite primes" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 10
Prove that infinitely many prime numbers are possible.

Solution Scheme and approach
Let if possible there are a1,a2...an number of finite primes.
Consider another number 
N=(a1*a2*a3*...*an)+1
Now we can say,
N is such a number which can be divide by all primes but always gives a remainder 1. Hence, contradiction.
Because any number&amp;gt;1 should be divisible by at least one prime number.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0WP4f_M-dWT8EgKJsHdK-8qc-qQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0WP4f_M-dWT8EgKJsHdK-8qc-qQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0WP4f_M-dWT8EgKJsHdK-8qc-qQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0WP4f_M-dWT8EgKJsHdK-8qc-qQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/ke7UzI4hSes" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/infinite-primes.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE4MSHszeyp7ImA9WxBQFEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-6956413745655334554</id><published>2010-01-13T13:01:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-14T10:16:29.583-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-14T10:16:29.583-08:00</app:edited><title>Maximum value of a variable</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/6956413745655334554/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/maximum-value-of-variable.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6956413745655334554?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6956413745655334554?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/Yh038J56xMQ/maximum-value-of-variable.html" title="Maximum value of a variable" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 9
a+b+c+d+e=8
a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+e^2=16. [a,b,c,d,e are real numbers]

Find the maximum value of e.

Solution Scheme and approach:
This problem can easily be done with Cauchy-Schwartz  inequality. But will explain this in my next topic. Let's do it without Cauchy.

(a-r)^2+(b-r)^2+(c-r)^2+(d-r)^2+(e-r)^2
=(a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+e^2)-2r(a+b+c+d+e)+5r^2
=16-16r+5r^2[ By putting the values]

we can 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EpKtfWrg7CJ1mYhedvKRYEcMwyc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EpKtfWrg7CJ1mYhedvKRYEcMwyc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EpKtfWrg7CJ1mYhedvKRYEcMwyc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EpKtfWrg7CJ1mYhedvKRYEcMwyc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/Yh038J56xMQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/maximum-value-of-variable.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUEQX0_eip7ImA9WxBQEk8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-7978702439155486787</id><published>2010-01-11T07:53:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-11T08:26:40.342-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-11T08:26:40.342-08:00</app:edited><title>PROBLEM OF THE WEEK-1</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/7978702439155486787/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/problem-of-week-1.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/7978702439155486787?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/7978702439155486787?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/BDjnmIf5ul4/problem-of-week-1.html" title="PROBLEM OF THE WEEK-1" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Here I start a new section called problem of the week. Solution of this question will be posted in the coming week. Till then have fun. 

Alphonse and Beryl are back! They are playing a two person game with the following
rules:
• Initially there is a pile of N stones, with N &amp;gt;= 2.
• The players alternate turns, with Alphonse going first. On his first
turn, Alphonse must remove at least 1 and at 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/auTm_pW2ZbWZwL8nhf0hTYI65_I/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/auTm_pW2ZbWZwL8nhf0hTYI65_I/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/auTm_pW2ZbWZwL8nhf0hTYI65_I/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/auTm_pW2ZbWZwL8nhf0hTYI65_I/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/BDjnmIf5ul4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/problem-of-week-1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkMER3g_fSp7ImA9WxBQEk8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-4281990971998780932</id><published>2010-01-11T06:33:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-11T06:33:26.645-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-11T06:33:26.645-08:00</app:edited><title>e is irrational</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/4281990971998780932/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/e-is-irrational.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/4281990971998780932?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/4281990971998780932?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/0GfXdbGutmw/e-is-irrational.html" title="e is irrational" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 8
Prove that e is irrational
Solution scheme and approach
e=1+1/1!+2/2!+3/3!+.....(i)
Let e is rational so e=p/q
multiplying equation number (i) by q! we get
q!*e=q!+q!/1!+q!/2!+q!/3!+....+q/q!+ other terms
Now as q!+q!/1!+...+q!/q! is an integer and q!*e is also an integer
So we can say other terms should be an integer. Let I signifies the rest terms whose summation is an integer.
I=q![
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8kJT48QgZtjSXfqZiBqslso3A0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8kJT48QgZtjSXfqZiBqslso3A0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8kJT48QgZtjSXfqZiBqslso3A0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8kJT48QgZtjSXfqZiBqslso3A0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/0GfXdbGutmw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/e-is-irrational.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0ADRXk7fip7ImA9WxBRGEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-5237672855056334376</id><published>2010-01-07T09:34:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-07T09:36:14.706-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-07T09:36:14.706-08:00</app:edited><title>Number's application</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/5237672855056334376/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/equation-and-number.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/5237672855056334376?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/5237672855056334376?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/TxYE6DzDhz4/equation-and-number.html" title="Number's application" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 7
Show that there is no integer a such that a^2-3a-19 is divisible by 289.[R.M.O. 2009] 
Solution Scheme and Approach
a^2-3a-19
=a^2-3a-70+51
=(a+7)(a-10)+51 ...(i)

Now as (i) divides by 289 it should be divisible by 17 as well. So, it is clear at least one of (a+7) and (a-10) should be divisible by 17.
Let, a-10=17k =&amp;gt;a=10+17k therefore a+7=17(k+1)
Hence we can write a^2-3a-19=289k(k+1
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z1wiO54owc_9cEoKFdIibxxGBZw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z1wiO54owc_9cEoKFdIibxxGBZw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z1wiO54owc_9cEoKFdIibxxGBZw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z1wiO54owc_9cEoKFdIibxxGBZw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/TxYE6DzDhz4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/equation-and-number.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUYASHc8cCp7ImA9WxBRFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-5159240072468603941</id><published>2010-01-02T07:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-02T07:45:49.978-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-02T07:45:49.978-08:00</app:edited><title>Cubic Equation</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/5159240072468603941/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/cubic-equation.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/5159240072468603941?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/5159240072468603941?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/iLigEAmTKww/cubic-equation.html" title="Cubic Equation" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">#Problem 6  
The cubic equation x^3+2x-1 = 0 has exactly one real root r. Note that 0.4 &amp;lt; r &amp;lt; 0.5.
(a)Prove that an increasing sequence of positive integers a1,a2,a3,.....exists, such that 1/2=r^a1+r^a2+r^a3+.... is possible 
(b) Prove that the sequence that you found in part (a) is the unique increasing sequence
with the above property.
Solution Scheme and approach
(a)
As r is a root then we may
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RDmljMSwvAf0La_m9_UDzY69YpI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RDmljMSwvAf0La_m9_UDzY69YpI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RDmljMSwvAf0La_m9_UDzY69YpI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RDmljMSwvAf0La_m9_UDzY69YpI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/iLigEAmTKww" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/cubic-equation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUENSX8-fyp7ImA9WxBRFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-6037386027907460793</id><published>2010-01-02T02:11:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-02T02:21:38.157-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-02T02:21:38.157-08:00</app:edited><title>Perfect square</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/6037386027907460793/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/perfect-square.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6037386027907460793?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6037386027907460793?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/sm1JWQ6JWzY/perfect-square.html" title="Perfect square" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">This is one of the important topics which often comes in various competitive exams.

#Problem 5(A)
Find the total number of values of n for which n^2 + 24n + 21 is a perfect square.Where n is natural number.
Solution scheme and approach
Let n^2+24n+21 is a perfect square.Hence we can write
n^2+24n+21=k^2
=&amp;gt;n^2+2*n*12+12^2-12^2+21=k^2
=&amp;gt;(n+12)^12-k^2=123
Case I
(n+12+k)(n+12-k)=3*41=(-3)*(-41)
So,
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aADGASs6DV89FOfrsRyXSYyHl8M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aADGASs6DV89FOfrsRyXSYyHl8M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aADGASs6DV89FOfrsRyXSYyHl8M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aADGASs6DV89FOfrsRyXSYyHl8M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/sm1JWQ6JWzY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/perfect-square.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAAR3s5eSp7ImA9WxBRFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-6555688192834996510</id><published>2010-01-01T00:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-02T02:22:26.521-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-02T02:22:26.521-08:00</app:edited><title>Concept 1 :KiSsInG cIrClEs</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/6555688192834996510/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/concept-1-theory-of-kissing-circles.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6555688192834996510?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/6555688192834996510?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/tV9Ks8OnXIo/concept-1-theory-of-kissing-circles.html" title="Concept 1 :KiSsInG cIrClEs" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html"> 

Descartes' theorem (1964)
If four mutually tangent circles have curvature ki (for i = 1,...,4), (ki=1/ri, Where ri is radius) 

 (1)
 
        
When trying to find the radius of a fourth circle tangent to three given kissing circles, the equation is best rewritten as:

 (2)
 
        
The ± sign reflects the fact that there are in general two solutions. Ignoring the degenerate case of a 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aE1M_-UsCNQInRBA0BfN8NgqzJ8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aE1M_-UsCNQInRBA0BfN8NgqzJ8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aE1M_-UsCNQInRBA0BfN8NgqzJ8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aE1M_-UsCNQInRBA0BfN8NgqzJ8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/tV9Ks8OnXIo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2010/01/concept-1-theory-of-kissing-circles.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUIASHs4eyp7ImA9WxBRFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-3567243177366278834</id><published>2009-12-31T11:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-02T02:19:09.533-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-02T02:19:09.533-08:00</app:edited><title>How many primes</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/3567243177366278834/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/problem-4-how-many-primes-among.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/3567243177366278834?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/3567243177366278834?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/5ZM_WJ2FZ9k/problem-4-how-many-primes-among.html" title="How many primes" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">

#Problem 4 
How many primes among the positive integers, written as usual in base 10, are such that their digits are altenating 1’s and 0’s, beginning and ending with 1? [Putnam]

Solution scheme and approach 
Let,
X=1010101…1=1+10^2+10^4+…+10^2n=(10^2n-1)/99=(10^n+1)*(10^n-1)/99

For n=2 X=101 which is a prime number
For n&amp;gt;=3
If n is even
{
As (10^n+1)&amp;gt;99
(10^n-1)=(9+1)^n -1=0(mod 9) So,(10^n-
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfs7D4GQa2mUPfOC3fpd-m_PazM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfs7D4GQa2mUPfOC3fpd-m_PazM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfs7D4GQa2mUPfOC3fpd-m_PazM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfs7D4GQa2mUPfOC3fpd-m_PazM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/5ZM_WJ2FZ9k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/problem-4-how-many-primes-among.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMMQHkyeSp7ImA9WxBRFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-4165914426533163226</id><published>2009-12-31T01:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-02T02:18:01.791-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-02T02:18:01.791-08:00</app:edited><title>Ultimate Divisibility</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/4165914426533163226/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/this-is-one-of-famous-puzzle.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/4165914426533163226?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/4165914426533163226?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/eSkGpmwjUTU/this-is-one-of-famous-puzzle.html" title="Ultimate Divisibility" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">



This is one of the famous puzzles. Try it. 

#Problem 3
Find a number consisting of 9 digits in which each of the digits from 1 to 9 appears only once. This number should satisfy the following requirements:
a. The number should be divisible by 9.
b. If the most right digit is removed, the remaining number should be divisible by 8.
c. If then again the most right digit is removed, the 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uHfc3M7CR5J3Se-3ukhNDFbccA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uHfc3M7CR5J3Se-3ukhNDFbccA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uHfc3M7CR5J3Se-3ukhNDFbccA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-uHfc3M7CR5J3Se-3ukhNDFbccA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/eSkGpmwjUTU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/this-is-one-of-famous-puzzle.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMBRng_fyp7ImA9WxBRFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-2580860547329527847</id><published>2009-12-30T16:46:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-02T02:17:37.647-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-02T02:17:37.647-08:00</app:edited><title>Infinite descent</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/2580860547329527847/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/infinite-descent-0.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/2580860547329527847?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/2580860547329527847?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/Bz5_100DpUM/infinite-descent-0.html" title="Infinite descent" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">


If x, y, z and n are integers, there are no solutions of  x^n+y^n=z^n with n&amp;gt;2 and x,y,z&amp;gt;0.This is known as Fermat's last theorem.

This problem can be an extension of Fermat's Infinite Descent

#Problem2  

Find all solutions to c2 + 1 = (a2 − 1)(b2 − 1), in integers a, b, and c.

Solution Scheme and approach
Clearly a = b = c = 0 is one integer solution.
Also, if c = 0, a^2 − 1 = ±1, and so 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N1wzYRPXwZDUkj83g72m_g46wog/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N1wzYRPXwZDUkj83g72m_g46wog/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N1wzYRPXwZDUkj83g72m_g46wog/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N1wzYRPXwZDUkj83g72m_g46wog/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/Bz5_100DpUM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/infinite-descent-0.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0YDQH46fyp7ImA9WxBRFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7408771368678736593.post-8685425837449436354</id><published>2009-12-30T14:23:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-03T09:52:51.017-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-03T09:52:51.017-08:00</app:edited><title>Number of solutions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/feeds/8685425837449436354/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/here-i-start-my-blog-with-very.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8685425837449436354?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7408771368678736593/posts/default/8685425837449436354?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Quantomania/~3/aVQrz658Q_8/here-i-start-my-blog-with-very.html" title="Number of solutions" /><author><name>PROBLEM SMOKER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03560832495155646004</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">Here I start my blog with a very interesting problem.

#Problem 1

Find the value of x and y. x^3+y^3=7163.[Where x and y are positive integers]

Solution scheme and approach 1

First of all one number should be even another is odd. Let, x=(2n+1) and y=2m
So,
x^3+y^3=7163
=&amp;gt;(2n+1)^3+(2m)^3=7163.....(i)
=&amp;gt;8n^3+12n^2+6n+1+(2m)^3=7163
=&amp;gt;2n(4n^2+6n+3)+8m^3=7162
=&amp;gt;n(4n^2+6n+3)+4m^3=3581

As RHS is odd
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fWUfJgK8Gg4esjRWHNJEeI3cdU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fWUfJgK8Gg4esjRWHNJEeI3cdU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fWUfJgK8Gg4esjRWHNJEeI3cdU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fWUfJgK8Gg4esjRWHNJEeI3cdU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Quantomania/~4/aVQrz658Q_8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://quantomania.blogspot.com/2009/12/here-i-start-my-blog-with-very.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

