<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Questions:</title><description>When you get a call for interview, make sure you are ready for it. Goin into an interview without fully prepared is a big mistake. Here are some suggestions.</description><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>5000</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/QuestionsForInterview" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-8580166720729633487</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T21:50:11.140+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: herb@.l c1@l.1s</title><atom:summary>I have closed the other spam threads. Also, I have setup my ownaccount to be moderated !! Let's see how *that* takes effect ! ;-)--Cerebrus.Group Moderator.On Nov 10, 1:27 pm, Cerebrus &lt;zorg...@sify.com&gt; wrote:&gt; Google Groups indicates the following header information (extracted&gt; from one of the other posts):&gt;&gt; ---&gt; Received: by 10.220.87.146 with SMTP id w18mr1551237vcl.&gt; 7.1257789890401;&gt;</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-herbl-c1l1s_7296.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-2323299607047911847</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T21:50:07.924+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Get unread mails in gmail inbox using C#</title><atom:summary>The OP is apparently female. That adage does not stand for women !Correction: "... Teach a woman to fish and she'll feed the wholeneighbourhood.":POn Nov 10, 2:23 pm, Mike Fry &lt;mike...@iafrica.com&gt; wrote:&gt; Give hand-outs and the hand will always be out. Teach a man to fish and he'll&gt; feed himself.&gt;</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-get-unread-mails_7130.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-7510219268171099469</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T14:26:40.206+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Get unread mails in gmail inbox using C#</title><atom:summary>I just wanted to say... she doesn't need to learn the complete POP protocol if she can search specific things she wants using google ;-)2009/11/10 Mike Fry &lt;mikefry@iafrica.com&gt;  Processor Devil wrote:  why the RFC? On internet is a lot of complete solutions (even in c#), she can look through and see some practical example how it works   Give hand-outs and the hand will always be out. Teach a man</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-get-unread-mails_9847.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-2823488913550191314</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T14:24:23.685+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Get unread mails in gmail inbox using C#</title><atom:summary>Processor Devil wrote:&gt; why the RFC?&gt; On internet is a lot of complete solutions (even in c#), she can look &gt; through and see some practical example how it worksGive hand-outs and the hand will always be out. Teach a man to fish and he'll feed himself.-- Best regards,Mike FryJohannesburg.</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-get-unread-mails_4185.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4654932822855803214</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T14:05:38.121+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Get unread mails in gmail inbox using C#</title><atom:summary>why the RFC?On internet is a lot of complete solutions (even in c#), she can look through and see some practical example how it works2009/11/10 Mike Fry &lt;mikefry@iafrica.com&gt;  Lauren wrote:   I'm currently at a loss on how to proceed from here. I've tried using the LIST command, but it returns message ID's and the size of the mails, which is not what I'm looking for. Is there another command I </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-get-unread-mails_4133.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-6041090048121345118</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T13:56:56.792+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Get unread mails in gmail inbox using C#</title><atom:summary>Lauren wrote:&gt; I'm currently at a loss on how to proceed from here. I've tried using&gt; the LIST command, but it returns message ID's and the size of the&gt; mails, which is not what I'm looking for. Is there another command I&gt; can use?No wonder you're at a loss! POP is plain text not web based. Get yourself a copy of RFC 1939 from the IETF.-- Best regards,Mike FryJohannesburg.</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-get-unread-mails_2175.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-3885658362207697272</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T13:50:00.701+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Spam!</title><atom:summary>zorg007@sify.com :o Not cerebrus ?? On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Brandon Betances &lt;bbetances@gmail.com&gt; wrote: now that sounds good. how about a bag of baked lays chips too and a dr. pepper?  On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Raju Kurian &lt;rajukurian@gmail.com&gt; wrote:    Spam and cheese sandwich with lattice, tomato, green paper and chipotle sauce on it.     On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM, </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-spam_10.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-5567227254992971385</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T13:39:52.717+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Web services and web proxy issue</title><atom:summary>By default, the Web service client proxy does not inherit the credentials of the security context where the Web service client application is running. To resolve this problem, you must use the Credentials property of the Web service client proxy to set the security credentials for Web service client authentication. Look in here for resolution details http://support.microsoft.com/kb/811318 On Tue,</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-web-services-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-5887033642900309976</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T13:28:10.873+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: herb@.l c1@l.1s</title><atom:summary>Google Groups indicates the following header information (extractedfrom one of the other posts):---Received: by 10.220.87.146 with SMTP id w18mr1551237vcl.7.1257789890401;        Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:04:50 -0800 (PST)Received: by 10.220.87.146 with SMTP id w18mr1551236vcl.7.1257789890371;        Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:04:50 -0800 (PST)Return-Path: &lt;zorg007@sify.com&gt;Received: from 2008X64.</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-herbl-c1l1s_4989.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-7459614699954253187</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T13:19:38.190+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: herb@.l c1@l.1s</title><atom:summary>Yes, that's correct. The same thing happened in Andrew Badera's case.I may have to ban my own account and use an alternate email address.--Cerebrus.Group Moderator.On Nov 10, 1:12 pm, Processor Devil &lt;processor.de...@gmail.com&gt; wrote:&gt; man, looks like some idiot is spoofing Cerebrus' e-mail address...&gt;&gt; 2009/11/9 Raju Kurian &lt;rajukur...@gmail.com&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; = Viagra&gt;&gt; &gt; Raju Kurian&gt; &gt; IL - 60523&gt;&gt; &gt; </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-herbl-c1l1s_267.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4795210061646850995</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T13:13:48.455+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: herb@.l c1@l.1s</title><atom:summary>man, looks like some idiot is spoofing Cerebrus' e-mail address...2009/11/9 Raju Kurian &lt;rajukurian@gmail.com&gt; = Viagra Raju KurianIL - 60523 On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Cerebrus &lt;zorg007@sify.com&gt; wrote:   v1@g4@!    </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-herbl-c1l1s_10.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-679272622418496075</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T13:28:34.937+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Get unread mails in gmail inbox using C#</title><atom:summary>I'm currently using POP. Here is the code so far:using System;using System.Data;using System.Configuration;using System.Web;using System.Web.Security;using System.Web.UI;using System.Web.UI.WebControls;using System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts;using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls;using System.IO;using System.Net.NetworkInformation;using System.Net.Security;using System.Net.Sockets;using </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-get-unread-mails_10.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4756535781170916321</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T11:49:50.256+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: generate Primary Key automaticaly</title><atom:summary>Set AutoIncrement, AutoIncrementSeed, AutoIncrementStep properties for the primary key column   With Primary_Key_Columns  .DataType = System.Type.GetType("System.Int32")  .ColumnName = "PKPlanning"  .AutoIncrement = True  .AutoIncrementSeed = -1  .AutoIncrementStep = -1 End With On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:29 PM, trouffiondesiles &lt;willignicolas@gmail.com&gt; wrote: HI,I have a problem when i add a row </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-generate-primary.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4141868381380202785</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T12:41:24.690+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Font Problem when exporting from Crystal Reports to PDF Format</title><atom:summary>hai am laxminarayana,   am getting the problem of font size when exporting from CrystalReports toPDF Format. When i give print the actual foamte was not comming. it`sfont size decreases when i give print in PDF format. please help friends.with regardslaxminarayana</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-font-problem-when.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-1018579479865018806</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T12:41:14.595+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Web services and web proxy issue</title><atom:summary>I have a windows application that connects to a web service that we'vejust rolled out to a new client.  The application is throwing a 401access denied error when the application is trying to connect to theweb service.Some things I've tried:I tested that the user ID and password are correct by installing theapplication on a few of our home computers.  All of them succeed withthe right credentials </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-web-services-and-web.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-8537692540615223516</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T01:39:46.258+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: herb@.l c1@l.1s</title><atom:summary>= ViagraRaju KurianIL - 60523 On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Cerebrus &lt;zorg007@sify.com&gt; wrote:  v1@g4@!   </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-herbl-c1l1s.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4607512790038963901</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T01:31:59.042+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] herb@.l c1@l.1s</title><atom:summary>v1@g4@!</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-herbl-c1l1s.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4472204208305071382</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-10T12:41:26.104+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: XPATH: How do make this query work.</title><atom:summary>Thanks for the query. It works great!I understand what youre saying about my XML design. I also understandthat the query we're trying to develop is prone to error. Anythingunusual will cause errors.The reason I've structured it this way is because I am going to allowthe user to create any levels of sub-accounts. Giving different namefor each level of subnode will be like hardcoding i think. I </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-xpath-how-do-make_4317.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-8189020510035126579</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T23:34:23.570+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Spam!</title><atom:summary>now that sounds good. how about a bag of baked lays chips too and a dr. pepper? On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Raju Kurian &lt;rajukurian@gmail.com&gt; wrote: Spam and cheese sandwich with lattice, tomato, green paper and chipotle sauce on it.     On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Brandon Betances &lt;bbetances@gmail.com&gt; wrote: spam and cheese sandwich On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Cerebrus &lt;zorg007@</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-spam_4667.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-5324196542657236869</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T23:34:14.025+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Spam!</title><atom:summary>mmm yummyOn Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Raju Kurian &lt;rajukurian@gmail.com&gt; wrote: Spam and cheese sandwich with lattice, tomato, green paper and chipotle sauce on it. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Brandon Betances &lt;bbetances@gmail.com&gt; wrote:  spam and cheese sandwich On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Cerebrus &lt;zorg007@sify.com&gt; wrote: Spam!  -- Thanks,SushmaEmail: sushmag14@gmail.com </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-spam_2093.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-1254416533104576930</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T23:31:57.745+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Spam!</title><atom:summary>Spam and cheese sandwich with lattice, tomato, green paper and chipotle sauce on it. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Brandon Betances &lt;bbetances@gmail.com&gt; wrote: spam and cheese sandwich On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Cerebrus &lt;zorg007@sify.com&gt; wrote: Spam!  </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-spam_9052.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-8985096938725645400</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T23:30:31.319+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Spam!</title><atom:summary>spam, cheese sandwich and diet cokeOn Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Cerebrus &lt;zorg007@sify.com&gt; wrote:  Spam!  -- Thanks,SushmaEmail: sushmag14@gmail.com </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-spam_09.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-1938455651889848022</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T23:12:20.389+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Re: Spam!</title><atom:summary>spam and cheese sandwich On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Cerebrus &lt;zorg007@sify.com&gt; wrote: Spam! </atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-re-spam.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4572141688121220963</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T23:10:14.993+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Spam spam spammy spam spam spam spam spam!</title><atom:summary>Spam!</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-spam-spam-spammy-spam.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7073218797897199044.post-4215059938720620814</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T23:05:58.367+05:00</atom:updated><title>[DotNetDevelopment] Spam!</title><atom:summary>Spam!</atom:summary><link>http://www.lancepoint.org/2009/11/dotnetdevelopment-spam.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (OP)</author></item></channel></rss>
