<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 06:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Market News</category><category>Earnings</category><category>Stock Picks</category><category>Technical Analysis</category><category>Economy</category><category>Emerging Markets</category><category>Technology Sector</category><category>Finance Sector</category><category>Charts</category><category>Educational</category><category>Real Estate</category><category>Trading Technique</category><category>Short Selling</category><category>Dollar</category><category>Investment</category><category>Basic Material Sector</category><category>Gold</category><category>Retail</category><category>Energy Sector</category><category>Oil</category><category>Video</category><category>Mortgage</category><category>Exchange Trade Funds</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Fundamental Analysis</category><category>Employment</category><category>Service Sector</category><category>Watchlist</category><category>Apple</category><category>Commodity Sector</category><category>Recession</category><category>Bear Market</category><category>Health Care Sector</category><category>Index</category><category>Airline Sector</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Auto Sector</category><category>Options</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>High Dividend</category><category>Inflation</category><category>Money Market</category><category>IPO</category><category>Agriculture Sector</category><category>Glossary</category><category>Euro</category><category>Humor</category><category>Stock Market Search Engine</category><category>Telecom Sector</category><category>Utilities Sector</category><title>Small Cap Bear...</title><description>Bulls &amp;amp; Bears Make Money, Pigs Get Slaughtered...Let Us Not Be That Pig...</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>479</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-2703712739982851295</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-27T13:28:34.609-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Educational</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Options</category><title>Options 101: Bull Call Spread </title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
The bull call spread option trading strategy is employed when the options trader thinks that the price of the underlying asset will go up moderately in the near term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bull call spreads can be implemented by buying an at-the-money call option while simultaneously writing a higher striking out-of-the-money call option of the same underlying security and the same expiration month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By shorting the out-of-the-money call, the options trader reduces the cost of establishing the bullish position but forgoes the chance of making a large profit in the event that the underlying asset price skyrockets. The bull call spread option strategy is also known as the bull call debit spread as a debit is taken upon entering the trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Limited Upside profits&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maximum gain is reached for the bull call spread options strategy when the stock price move above the higher strike price of the two calls and it is equal to the difference between the strike price of the two call options minus the initial debit taken to enter the position.&lt;br /&gt;
The formula for calculating maximum profit is given below:&lt;br /&gt;
Max Profit = Strike Price of Short Call - Strike Price of Long Call - Net Premium Paid - Commissions Paid&lt;br /&gt;
Max Profit Achieved When Price of Underlying &amp;gt;= Strike Price of Short Call&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Limited Downside risk&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bull call spread strategy will result in a loss if the stock price declines at expiration. Maximum loss cannot be more than the initial debit taken to enter the spread position.&lt;br /&gt;
The formula for calculating maximum loss is given below:&lt;br /&gt;
Max Loss = Net Premium Paid + Commissions Paid&lt;br /&gt;
Max Loss Occurs When Price of Underlying &amp;lt;= Strike Price of Long Call&lt;br /&gt;
Breakeven Point(s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The underlier price at which break-even is achieved for the bull call spread position can be calculated using the following formula.&lt;br /&gt;
Breakeven Point = Strike Price of Long Call + Net Premium Paid&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Bull Call Spread Example&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An options trader believes that XYZ stock trading at $42 is going to rally soon and enters a bull call spread by buying a JUL 40 call for $300 and writing a JUL 45 call for $100. The net investment required to put on the spread is a debit of $200.&lt;br /&gt;
The stock price of XYZ begins to rise and closes at $46 on expiration date. Both options expire in-the-money with the JUL 40 call having an intrinsic value of $600 and the JUL 45 call having an intrinsic value of $100. This means that the spread is now worth $500 at expiration. Since the trader had a debit of $200 when he bought the spread, his net profit is $300.&lt;br /&gt;
If the price of XYZ had declined to $38 instead, both options expire worthless. The trader will lose his entire investment of $200, which is also his maximum possible loss.&lt;br /&gt;
Note: While we have covered the use of this strategy with reference to stock options, the bull call spread is equally applicable using ETF options, index options as well as options on futures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Commissions&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For ease of understanding, the calculations depicted in the above examples did not take into account commission charges as they are relatively small amounts (typically around $10 to $20) and varies across option brokerages.&lt;br /&gt;
However, for active traders, commissions can eat up a sizable portion of their profits in the long run. If you trade options actively, it is wise to look for a low commissions broker. Traders who trade large number of contracts in each trade should check out OptionsHouse.com as they offer a low fee of only $0.15 per contract (+$8.95 per trade).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Aggressive Bull Call Spread&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can enter a more aggressive bull spread position by widening the difference between the strike price of the two call options. However, this will also mean that the stock price must move upwards by a greater degree for the trader to realise the maximum profit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: OptionsGuide&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/04/options-101-bull-call-spread.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (ms)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-9218738952675999015</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-25T07:57:53.804-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Earnings</category><title>Earnings Report: Zynga, Qualcomm, F5 Networks, Yum! Brands</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Zynga&lt;/strong&gt; (ZNGA $3.03 -0.32) reported first quarter earnings 
    of $0.01 per share, excluding non-recurring items (Co guided to 
    ($0.05)-(0.04) on Feb 5), $0.05 better than the Capital IQ consensus of 
    ($0.04), while revenues fell 17.9% year/year to $263.6 million versus the 
    $264.77 million consensus. Co issued downside guidance for the second 
    quarter with EPS loss of ($0.04) - ($0.03), excluding non-recurring items 
    versus the ($0.01) Capital IQ consensus and revenues of&amp;nbsp; $225-235 million 
    versus the. $261.72 million consensus. Daily active users (DAUs) decreased 
    from 65 million in the first quarter of 2012 to 52 million in the first 
    quarter of 2013, down 21% year-over-year. On a consecutive quarter basis, 
    DAUs were down 8% from 56 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. Monthly 
    active users (MAUs) decreased from 292 million in the first quarter of 
    2012 to 253 million in the first quarter of 2013, down 13% year-over-year. 
    On a consecutive quarter basis, MAUs were down 15% from 298 million in the 
    fourth quarter of 2012. Monthly unique users (MUUs) decreased from 182 
    million in the first quarter of 2012 to 150 million in the first quarter 
    of 2013, down 18% year-over-year. On a consecutive quarter basis, MUUs 
    were down 10% from 167 million in the fourth quarter of 2012. Bookings 
    were $229.8 million for the first quarter of 2013, a decrease of 30% 
    compared to the first quarter of 2012 and a decrease of 12% compared to 
    the fourth quarter of 2012. Q2 Bookings are projected to be in the range 
    of $180 million to $190 million. Q2 Adjusted EBITDA is projected to be in 
    the range of ($10) million to break even &quot;We are encouraged by the strong 
    execution from our teams and the breakout hit performance of FarmVille 2, 
    which captures the imagination of nearly 40 million players every 
    month....2013 will continue to be a transition year as we face the 
    challenging environment on the web and invest in developing the leading 
    franchises and network across web and mobile platforms and offer our 253 
    million monthly players a connected experience that can follow them from 
    work to school to home and anywhere in between.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Qualcomm&lt;/strong&gt; (QCOM $62.12 -3.87) reported second quarter 
    earnings of $1.17 per share, excluding non-recurring items, in-line with 
    the Capital IQ consensus of $1.17, while revenues rose 23.9% year/year to 
    $6.12 billion versus the $6.08 billion consensus.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Q2 Key Business 
    Metrics MSM chip shipments: 173 million units, up 14 percent y-o-y and 
    down 5 percent sequentially. December quarter total reported device sales: 
    approx $61.1 billion, up 18 percent y-o-y and 15% QoQ. December quarter 
    estimated 3G/4G device shipments: ~279 to 283 million units, at an 
    estimated average selling price of approximately $214 to $220 per unit.&amp;nbsp; 
    The company issued in-line guidance for the third quarter with EPS of f 
    $0.97-1.05, excluding non-recurring items, versus the $1.04 Capital IQ 
    consensus and revenues of $5.8-6.3 billion versus $5.88 billion Capital IQ 
    consensus. The company issued guidance for FY13, raises EPS&amp;nbsp;to $4.40-4.55, 
    excluding non-recurring items, from $4.25-4.45&amp;nbsp;versus the. $4.53 Capital 
    IQ consensus. The company raised revenues to $24.0-25.0 billion from 
    $23.4-24.4 billion versus the $24.1 bln Capital IQ consensus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;F5 Networks&lt;/strong&gt; (FFIV $74.89 +2.54) reported fourth quarter 
    earnings of $1.07 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.01 better 
    than the Capital IQ consensus of $1.06, while revenues rose 3.1% year/year 
    to $350.2 million versus the $350.19 million consensus. The company issues 
    downside guidance for Q3, sees EPS of $1.06-1.09, excluding non-recurring 
    items versus the. $1.11 Capital IQ consensus and revenues of $355-365 
    million versus the $366.89 million Capital IQ consensus. The company also 
    announced today that its board of directors had authorized an additional 
    $200 million for the company&#39;s common stock share repurchase program. This 
    new authorization is incremental to the $81.3 million currently in the 
    existing program which was initially authorized in October 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

      &lt;strong&gt;YUM! Brands&lt;/strong&gt; (YUM $66.51 +2.36) reported first quarter 
      adjusted earnings of $0.70 per share, $0.10 better than the Capital IQ 
      consensus of $0.60;, while revenues fell 7.6% year/year to $2.54 billion 
      versus the $2.56 billion&amp;nbsp; consensus;&amp;nbsp;worldwide system sales grew 1%, 
      prior to FX,&amp;nbsp;including 4% at Yum! Restaurants International (YRI) and 2% 
      in the U.S. System sales declined 9% in China.&amp;nbsp; Same-store sales 
      declined 20% in China (previously reported). Same-store sales grew 1% at 
      YRI and 2% in the U.S. Total international development was 380 new 
      restaurants; 88% of this development occurred in emerging markets.&amp;nbsp; 
      Worldwide restaurant margin declined 2.7 percentage points to 15.9%, 
      including a decline of 7.0 percentage points in China. Restaurant margin 
      increased 1.4 percentage points at YRI and 2.4 percentage points in the 
      U.S. Worldwide operating profit declined 14%, prior to foreign currency 
      translation, including a 41% decline in China. Operating profit grew 19% 
      at YRI and 5% in the U.S.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;While better than 
      expected, the first quarter was extremely difficult for Yum! Brands. As 
      anticipated, intense media attention surrounding poultry supply in China 
      significantly impacted KFC sales and profit. Earnings per share declined 
      8% versus prior year, as our China Division operating profit fell 41%. 
      Operating profit increased 19% at Yum! Restaurants International and 5% 
      in our U.S. business. The negative media surrounding poultry supply in 
      China has subsided. We have taken steps to enhance our industry-leading 
      supply chain practices, and we&#39;re now in the midst of an aggressive 
      quality assurance marketing campaign. However, our sales recovery has 
      been adversely affected by the recent news of Avian flu. This news 
      surfaced during the first week of April and continues to negatively 
      impact same-store sales. We continue to remind consumers that properly 
      cooked chicken is perfectly safe to eat. Historically, the sales impact 
      of Avian flu publicity has initially been dramatic at KFC but relatively 
      short-lived. We will stay the course with our plans to develop at least 
      700 new units in China this year to lay the foundation for future 
      growth. We have complete confidence in a full sales recovery...There is 
      no doubt 2013 will be a challenging year for our company. With news of 
      Avian flu, there will obviously be more volatility with our China sales 
      recovery. However, given better-than-expected first-quarter performance, 
      our estimated mid-single-digit full-year EPS decline versus prior year 
      remains unchanged. I&#39;m confident we will end the year with momentum and 
      restore our track record of consistently delivering double-digit EPS 
      growth in 2014 and beyond.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/04/earnings-report-zynga-qualcomm-f5.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-2396555016530153110</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-25T07:45:46.691-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Basic Material Sector</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Earnings</category><title> Cliff Natural shares soar 7% following beat on earnings</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Cliffs Natural Resources&lt;/strong&gt; (CLF $19.56 +1.63) reported 
    first quarter earnings of $0.60 per share, $0.25 better than the Capital 
    IQ consensus of $0.35, while revenues fell 5.9% year/year to $1.14 billion 
    versus the $1.19 billion consensus.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
First-quarter 2013 U.S. Iron Ore 
    pellet sales volume was 3.1 million tons, compared with 3.4 million tons 
    in Q1 of 2012. The decrease was primarily driven by lower&amp;nbsp;YoY volume to 
    one customer due to its bankruptcy in May of 2012.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
Cliffs also indicated 
    Q1 U.S. Iron Ore sales volume is historically lower compared with other 
    periods due to seasonal shipping constraints on the Great Lakes. U.S. Iron 
    Ore 2013 Q1 revenues per ton were $119.82, up 2% from $117.40 in the 
    year-ago quarter. The increase was primarily attributable to customer mix 
    and favorable provisional pricing settlements when compared to Q1 of 2012. 
    Cash cost per ton in U.S. Iron Ore was $60.17, down 2% from $61.14 in the 
    prior year&#39;s first quarter. The decrease was primarily attributed to lower 
    maintenance expenses. &quot;Looking ahead, Cliffs anticipates the end markets 
    for its products to remain healthy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/042513/CLFc0dl1044.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/042513/CLFc0dl1044.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
In Q1 of 2013, China&#39;s annualized 
    crude steel production achieved record levels, while utilization rates in 
    North American remained stable. The Co expects pricing for the commodities 
    it sells to remain volatile, with the potential to significantly decrease 
    or increase at any point in time. Due to this expected volatility and for 
    the purpose of providing a full-year outlook, Cliffs will utilize the 
    year-to-date average Platts 62% Fe seaborne iron ore spot price as of 
    March 31, 2013 of $148 per ton (C.F.R. China), as a base price assumption 
    for providing its full-year revenue-per-ton sensitivities for the Co&#39;s 
    iron ore business segments.&quot;&amp;nbsp;&quot;Cliffs indicated this assumption does not 
    reflect the Co&#39;s internal expectation of full-year seaborne iron ore 
    pricing. As such, with $148 per ton as a base-price assumption for the 
    full year, included in the table below is the expected full-year 
    revenue-per-ton range for the Co&#39;s iron ore business segments and the 
    per-ton sensitivity for each $10-per-ton variance from the base-price 
    assumption. The full-year sensitivity per ton for each respective iron ore 
    business segment below reflects the sales volume and realized price 
    achieved for first-quarter 2013 results and Cliffs&#39; realized expectation 
    for the remaining periods in 2013.&quot; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/04/cliff-natural-shares-soar-7-following.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-317893847979424828</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-25T01:00:50.845-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Investment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trading Technique</category><title>Ten Investing Rules To Avoid Losing Money By Paul Farrell</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The winning strategy for Main Street investors playing in Wall Street’s casino against killer pros is being patient, minimizing mistakes. Yes, follow his 10 rules and you can win the “loser’s game:”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Never speculate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, the financial press acts like Nascar cheerleaders. One says jump on board now, this market is a “muscle car mired in the mud,” soon to get “unstuck.” Another tells investors to gamble: “For higher returns, you need to get into riskier investments.” No wonder Ellis coined the term, “Loser’s Game,” it’s accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Your home is not a stock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You live in it. Today many mistakenly assume that rising equity values mean you don’t have to save for retirement. Or that you can use a home-equity loan to buy stuff. Or worse yet, use that money to buy more properties and start condo-flipping. Warning, when the bubble pops it will be too late for you to exit the loser’s game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Save lots more regularly&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Savings glut” is the latest euphemism invented by happy-face economists and politicians. America’s savings rate has dropped from 10% two decades ago to zero, and has only recently started back up. Out-of-control consumption means importing and running trade deficits,. Meanwhile China recycles our dollars into Treasurys. This game is ending. Not saving now won’t help you later. Most retirees have too little set aside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Brokers aren’t your friends&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is an inherent conflict of interest between you and every broker in the world. Even if they’re your neighbor and best friend. Bottom line: They make their living on fees and commissions, and that reduces your returns. They win and you lose. Think index funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Never trade commodities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, you may want to add a small allocation of energy, metals or other commodity index funds to your long-term portfolio. But short-term trading is a loser’s game, and a fast one. Commodity traders tell me that all amateurs invariably lose all their risk capital within 12-18 months, then they quit trading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Avoid new and exciting deals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now, with all the turmoil and risks domestically and globally, chasing hot stocks and exotic opportunities is an instant replay of the irrational exuberance that got us all in trouble with dot-coms in the 1990s, real estate around 2005-2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Bonds also ride up and down&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Movie buffs used to say Fred Astaire was the greatest dancer of all time. Until a woman reviewer noted: Ginger Rogers was the greatest. She did the same as Fred, only backwards in high heels. Great visual when Charlie Ellis reminds us that in the short term bonds also go up and down like stocks. However, you increase your chances of winning the loser’s game remembering that as soon as the Fed increases rates, bond values will crash.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Never invest for tax benefits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every year my accountant reminds me of this rule. Every decision should first make sense as an investment. Same applies if you’re making a business purchase like an SUV. Tax benefits are secondary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Write your goals ... and stick to them&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Especially a well-diversified, long-term asset allocation strategy. A budget. A savings plan with regular money going into a retirement program. Career goals. And start living below your means now, save more now, because later will be too late. Put it in writing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Never trust your emotions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Behavioral economics was launched when Ellis wrote the first edition of “Winning the Losers’ Game.” This new science makes it clear investors are their own worst enemy. We’re not rational. We’re too optimistic in spite of impossible odds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pros own the game, insiders own the casino, rig the tables. They have more information, get it faster than you do, got more chips to play with, and they spend all day playing ... while you work for a living. You’re an amateur, at the loser’s tables, playing by their rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Worse, you can’t win because your emotions trigger too many mistakes, so they will set you up, trip you up and take advantage of your irrational brain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Market Watch&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/04/ten-investing-rules-to-avoid-losing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-2534690355668390938</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 07:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-25T00:53:25.658-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gold</category><title>Gold Trying To Recover From Its Dramatic Drop</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gold futures climbed Thursday in electronic trade, on track for a second consecutive advance, supported by strengthening physical demand for the precious metal and downbeat U.S. economic figures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gold for June delivery GCM3 +1.44% &amp;nbsp; pushed higher by $21.90, or 1.5%, to $1,445.90 an ounce in Asian trading hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The contract on Wednesday rose $14.90, or 1.1%, on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. The gain came as orders for U.S. durable goods fell by a seasonally adjusted 5.7% in March, worse than the 3.2% decline expected by economists polled by MarketWatch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/042513/GLDc0dl0350.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;308&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/042513/GLDc0dl0350.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generally soft data followed reports that manufacturing activity slowed toward the end of the first quarter, reinforcing worries about sluggishness in the broader U.S. economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further evidence of economic slowing would likely prevent the U.S. Federal Reserve from signaling an early exit from quantitative easing, a monetary policy that’s been supportive for gold, some analysts have said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6534875.6606;sz=200x200;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802463511;pid=1024829;usg=AFHzDLt-PcYKumCc3Foxqi89TWKI960k0w;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.kohls.com%252Fproduct%252Fprd-1024829%252Fcitizen-eco-drive-regent-stainless-steel-rose-gold-tone-diamond-accent-chronograph-watch-fb1223-55x-women.jsp%253Fpfx%253Dpfx_shopcompare%2526cid%253Dshopping3;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.kohls.com.edgesuite.net%2Fis%2Fimage%2Fkohls%2F1024829%3Fwid%3D500%26hei%3D500%26op_sharpen%3D1;width=200;height=200&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6534875.6607;sz=200x200;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802463511;pid=1035673;usg=AFHzDLu41SvJJSCNqeFQJvHZW_SMnlsAgQ;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.kohls.com%252Fproduct%252Fprd-1035673%252Fcitizen-eco-drive-regent-stainless-steel-rose-gold-tone-diamond-accent-chronograph-watch-fb1223-55d-women.jsp%253Fpfx%253Dpfx_shopcompare%2526cid%253Dshopping3;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.kohls.com.edgesuite.net%2Fis%2Fimage%2Fkohls%2F1035673%3Fwid%3D500%26hei%3D500%26op_sharpen%3D1;width=200;height=200&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Investors will receive weekly U.S. jobless claims data later Thursday. Reports on first-quarter gross domestic product and consumer sentiment in April are slated for release Friday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gold prices have had a rough April, with a tumble of nearly 11% putting them in position for their worst monthly slide since September 2011. But analysts have said that global physical demand for gold is still strong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. Mint this week stopped sales of its smallest-denomination gold bullion coins as demand reduced government inventories. Year to date, demand for the one-tenth-ounce coins have more than doubled compared with the same time a year ago, the U.S. Mint said in a memo to authorized purchasers, according to The Wall Street Journal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been other reports about shortages of gold bars and coins in some countries, according to Jim Wycoff, senior analyst at Kitco.com.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Market Watch&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/04/gold-trying-to-recover-from-its.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-6296531526823641345</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-21T23:18:09.167-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economy</category><title>Weak Economy Aboard Threatens US Recovery</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
Troubles overseas are threatening the U.S. recovery for the fourth year 
      in a row. This time it&#39;s weakening economies abroad, rather than 
      tumbling financial markets, signaling turbulence ahead.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
U.S. exports of goods to the European Union are declining outright. 
      Growth in overall U.S. exports has been sputtering for months, after a 
      three-year postrecession surge. And major U.S. companies are reporting 
      increasingly dour overseas outlooks tied to the recession-plagued euro 
      zone and slowing growth in other leading economies such as China.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The renewed fears of a global slowdown come after months of hope that a 
      stronger recovery was finally taking shape.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;Every now and then you see a glimmer, things seem to improve, and then 
      a little bit of bad news comes,&quot; World Bank chief economist Kaushik Basu 
      said as the world&#39;s finance ministers and central bankers gathered in 
      Washington in recent days to discuss how to revive growth.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The emerging troubles today are different from the scares of the past 
      three years.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      In 2010, 2011 and 2012, existential fears of a euro-zone collapse 
      spooked investors around the world. While U.S. equity markets rose 
      substantially over that period, they periodically took sharp slides that 
      frightened businesses and weighed down confidence.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Despite the financial tremors, underlying economic growth remained 
      moderate in the U.S., and most major euro-zone economies muddled through 
      the early years of their crisis. U.S. exports to Europe expanded despite 
      the clouds over the continent, helping to propel the U.S. recovery.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Financial markets have been on a tear since the European Central Bank 
      vowed last summer to protect the euro currency. U.S. stocks, as well, 
      have jumped 15% since last November, buoyed in part by the Federal 
      Reserve&#39;s aggressive bond-buying program.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      But major economies are languishing. The euro zone&#39;s recession is 
      stretching out longer, China faces new fears of a slowdown and worries 
      have re-emerged about a &quot;spring swoon&quot; in the U.S.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;The pickup in financial markets is clearly not translating into a 
      sustained pickup in growth and jobs,&quot; International Monetary Fund 
      Managing Director Christine Lagarde said last week. The IMF projects the 
      global economy will expand just 3.3% this year, largely unchanged from 
      2012. It expanded 5.2% in 2010, the first full year of recovery, and 4% 
      in 2011.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Signs of global weakness are showing up across corporate America.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      General Electric Co. (GE) on Friday said Europe&#39;s troubles weighed down 
      its results during the first quarter, despite posting higher overall 
      profits. &quot;We planned for Europe to be similar to 2012--down again--but 
      it was even weaker than we had expected,&quot; Chief Executive Jeffrey Immelt 
      said. The company&#39;s industrial revenue fell 17% in Europe, while other 
      businesses there also struggled.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6533655.3595;sz=200x200;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802463918;pid=62366;usg=AFHzDLtj9S5H9Mxq243VH4r-0lrzAWUpUQ;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.abt.com%252Fproduct%252F62366%252FGE-PFE29PSDSS.html;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.abt.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fproducts%2Fl_PFE29PSSS.jpg;width=200;height=191&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6533655.3600;sz=200x200;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802463918;pid=54063;usg=AFHzDLshvowIvLNAWYVCPnWXzwNIv45xmQ;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.abt.com%252Fproduct%252F54063%252FGE-PFCS1RKZSS.html;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.abt.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fproducts%2Fl_PFCS1RKSS.jpg;width=200;height=200&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Falling commodity prices--one result of slowing growth--have put a dent 
      in orders for mining equipment that other manufacturers are receiving. 
      The equipment giant Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) said Friday that its retail 
      sales of machines fell 11% in the first quarter from the same period a 
      year earlier as demand cooled in major markets. The company&#39;s sales in 
      the Asia-Pacific region alone were down 24% during the quarter.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      The U.S. has its own share of homegrown problems adding to the overseas 
      slowdown. An increase in payroll taxes in January is restraining 
      consumers, hurting retail sales and hammering confidence. Federal budget 
      cuts that started last month are expected to dent growth in the coming 
      months as government workers take furloughs and contractors cut jobs.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The latest hits to U.S. consumers and businesses make overseas customers 
      more important for U.S. companies. But economic trouble in the euro zone 
      is ricocheting around the world and hurting other areas, such as China, 
      which is also seeing exports to Europe struggle. That is contributing to 
      China&#39;s weakness and limiting how much Chinese consumers and businesses 
      might buy from American companies.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      For McDonald&#39;s Corp. (MCD), the world&#39;s top-selling restaurant chain, 
      sales have slipped at stores in China, Europe and the U.S. as trouble 
      has spread around the globe. Sales at U.S. and European locations open 
      at least 13 months fell more than 1% in the first quarter, while they 
      dropped 4.6% in China.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      McDonald&#39;s CEO Don Thompson on Friday blamed the company&#39;s troubles in 
      part on Europe&#39;s &quot;persistently high unemployment rates and ongoing 
      austerity measures&quot; along with &quot;soft&quot; economic conditions in Asia.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      He said U.S. sales faced &quot;significant headwinds,&quot; including wavering 
      consumer confidence.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Until recently, many U.S. investors and companies had looked past those 
      risks to the U.S. economy by focusing on stronger growth abroad. That 
      sentiment could be challenged soon. While stock markets and economies 
      frequently diverge, they can&#39;t move in opposite directions forever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/04/weak-economy-aboard-threatens-us.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-8419817465609490444</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-09T21:47:38.295-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Employment</category><title>Unemployment rises as real estate and stock market indices rise!</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
The current job-creation numbers are meaningfully below the level we might expect during a period of record corporate earnings and the reaching of new peaks in the major stock market indices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unemployment rate is 7.7%. But, there is another 0.6% of discouraged workers,(about 800,000) mainly the young, minorities and those without the all-necessary high school diploma. Another 0.9% are only marginally employed (whatever that means) and have mostly stopped looking for a job recently. More crushing is the 5.1% of the workforce most impacted by the 2008 downturn, who are working only part-time and would prefer to have a full-time position. That 5.1% part-time workers total 8 million people, who mostly are having trouble making ends meet and most likely have no health plan from their employer, according to Bob Eisenbreis, vice chairman and chief monetary economist at Cumberland Advisers, a New York-based investment firm that makes useful comments on the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers added together suggest that the true unemployment level– when part-time workers are included– is 14.3%–meaning that one in seven of every potential full-time employee in the U.S. economy is not able to earn a proper living wage–and thereby contribute to the snails-pace of economic growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To my way of thinking the dropout rate is the most perplexing, because how do these people survive? Moreover, the percentage of people employed is only 58.5%, down from 61%, the level hit in 2008 when Obama was first elected–and to be fair before the meltdown on Wall Street. And the jump in first-time unemployment claims last week was the highest level since last November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now comes the sequester–which is meant to slice 1.75% from GDP at a time the economy is supposed to be growing at only a 1.6% pace at best. In other words, fewer people will be earning wages just as bullish sentiment is gaining momentum for a risk-on long position in equities. Everywhere I go seasoned veterans believe the market’s current valuation of about 14 times earnings makes them comfortable for a long-lasting bull market. Because, after all, they argue–there is far more risk in the bond market. Incredibly, perversely almost–the public’s accumulation of fixed income mutual funds and ETFs continues big time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can only conclude that maybe corporate earnings will continue to increase, rewarding equity investors, because of the high unemployment rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Forbes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/04/unemployment-rises-as-real-estate-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-3104402155472956095</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-01T17:52:51.959-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Service Sector</category><title>Tiffany Net Up However Issues Downbeat 1Q View</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Tiffany &amp;amp; Co.&#39;s (TIF) fiscal fourth-quarter earnings rose 0.7% from a       prior year weighed down by headquarters relocation costs, while the       jewelry retailer&#39;s sales fell short of consensus estimates.&lt;/h2&gt;Tiffany warned it expects fiscal first-quarter adjusted earnings to       decline about 15% to 20% due to gross margin pressure and higher       marketing-related costs, while analysts were looking for flat profit.       The company predicts earnings growth in all subsequent quarters.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          The company forecast fiscal 2014 earnings from operations of $3.43 to       $3.53 a share on 6% to 8% sales growth, in line with the current       estimate of $3.50 a share on a 6% revenue increase to $4.04 billion from       analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          High-end shoppers have continued to snap up Tiffany&#39;s fine jewelry, such       as canary-yellow diamonds and engagement rings. But sales of silver       jewelry--which carry a higher profit margin than fine jewelry--have       declined of late as the retailer&#39;s less well-heeled customers are swayed       by a weak economy, cheaper knockoffs and what some consider a stagnant       selection.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          Tiffany has plans for an Art Deco collection of silver, onyx and       freshwater pearls this spring, as a less-expensive complement to       1920s-style platinum and diamond jewelry it recently created. It also       has been developing new products including a new metal alloy--a mix of       gold, silver and copper it calls Rubedo--and Tiffany jewelry pieces       fashioned from the pinkish-hued metal start at $250 for a small pendant.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          For the quarter ended Jan. 31, Tiffany reported a profit of $179.6       million, or $1.40 a share, up from $178.4 million, or $1.39 a share, a       year earlier. Last year&#39;s per-share earnings were $3.60 excluding costs       to relocate Tiffany&#39;s New York headquarters staff.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          The company&#39;s November projection was for per-share earnings of $1.35 to       $1.55, below consensus estimates at the time.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          Sales increased 4.1% to $1.24 billion, short of the $1.25 billion       forecast from Wall Street. Excluding the effect of foreign-currency       translation, sales rose 5%.    &lt;br /&gt;
          Same-store sales were flat with the prior year.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          Gross margin fell to 59.1% from 60.4%, partly due to pressures from       precious metal and diamond costs and a sales-mix shift towards       higher-priced, lower margin products.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
          Shares were trading 3.8% higher at $70.50 premarket. The stock has       climbed 18% so far this year through Thursday&#39;s close.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Source: Dow Jones &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/03/tiffany-net-up-however-issues-downbeat.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-1660908309015970605</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-02-04T09:09:34.330-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Earnings</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Service Sector</category><title>Royal Caribbean Swings to Loss on Impairment Charge</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) swung to a fourth-quarter loss as the 
      cruise ship company recorded a massive impairment charge, although net 
      yields--a key industry metric measuring revenue per available cruise 
      day--beat expectations.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      For the year, the company projected per-share earnings of $2.30 to 
      $2.50, below recent estimates of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters for 
      $2.67.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Royal Caribbean, whose brands include its namesake line and Celebrity 
      cruises, has seen its North American and Asia markets performing well, 
      although Europe has had larger-than-expected discounting as potential 
      passengers hemmed in bookings because of economic uncertainty and 
      fallout from last year&#39;s deadly wreck of the Costa Concordia, a 
      competitor&#39;s ship, in January. The accident, off the coast of Italy, 
      brought intense scrutiny to the issue of ship safety, and led Royal 
      Caribbean to temporarily suspend almost all of its marketing.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      On Monday, the company said it had recorded a total impairment charge of 
      $413.9 million for its Pullmantur brand, of which about $319.2 million 
      relates to goodwill. The remainder is for a valuation allowance for 
      deferred tax assets, a reduction in the value of the trademarks and an 
      impairment charge related to three aircraft that Pullmantur owns and 
      operates.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Royal Caribbean said its 2013 Wave season--the three-month stretch of 
      heavy bookings at the start of a year--is &quot;broadly off to a promising 
      start.&quot; However, it noted that &quot;booking volumes and pricing are down 
      substantially in Spain due to the impact of additional austerity 
      measures there, the lingering impact of the Costa Concordia tragedy and 
      other factors.&quot;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;Excluding the Pullmantur impairment charges, our operating results came 
      in remarkably close to our forecast from a year ago, which is notable 
      given the challenging environment,&quot; Chief Executive Richard D. Fain 
      said. &quot;Looking forward, we see a tale of two continents; North America 
      is doing well, while parts of Europe continue to be a challenge.&quot;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      For the quarter, Royal Caribbean reported a loss of $392.8 million, or 
      $1.80 a share, versus a profit of $36.6 million, or 17 cents a share, a 
      year earlier.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      In October, Royal Caribbean projected results for the quarter ranging 
      from a per-share loss of two cents to a profit of eight cents a share, 
      well below analyst expectations at the time.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Revenue rose 1.7% to $1.81 billion. Analysts recently expected $1.82 
      billion.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Net yields were up 1.8% on a constant currency basis versus the 
      company&#39;s guidance of an about 1% increase.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Shares rose 33 cents to $37.12 in recent premarket trading. The stock 
      has risen 20% in the past 12 months. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/02/royal-caribbean-swings-to-loss-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-1461612546636518623</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-23T13:14:00.081-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Technology Sector</category><title>SanDisk&#39;s quarterly revenue tops expectations</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
Chipmaker SanDisk Corp&#39;s &lt;sndk .o=&quot;&quot;&gt;fourth-quarter revenue topped analysts&#39; expectations, &amp;nbsp;&lt;/sndk&gt;helped by strong growth in solid-state drives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SanDisk earned $214 million, or 87 cents per share, in the December quarter, on revenue of $1.54 billion. Excluding items, it earned $1.05 a share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysts on average were expecting revenue of $1.526 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SanDisk makes NAND chips used in smartphones, cameras, storage drives and tablets to store data such as movies and photos. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The company&#39;s shares were flat in extended trade after closing down 0.63 percent at $47.65 on Nasdaq.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/sandisks-quarterly-revenue-tops.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-9113772726014589810</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-23T12:07:54.991-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Retail</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Service Sector</category><title>McDonald&#39;s Net Up 1.4%, U.S. Business Rebounds</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp; McDonald&#39;s Corp.&#39;s (MCD) fourth-quarter profit rose 1.4% as the 
      company&#39;s U.S. sales trends rebounded and its profitability improved, 
      though business in Europe and Japan continued to lag.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      McDonald&#39;s, the world&#39;s largest fast-food chain, has seen its quick 
      fixes for the U.S. business prove successful. It recently went back to 
      advertising its &quot;Dollar Menu&quot;, rather than some higher-priced items; it 
      shifted its annual McRib limited-time offering to December; and it 
      encouraged restaurants to stay open Christmas Day. U.S. sales at 
      restaurants open at least 13 months, called same-store sales, rose 0.9% 
      in December.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      However, negative customer traffic in Europe and continued weakness in 
      Japan offset its U.S. recovery, leading to flat global same-store sales 
      last month. And the company expects to return to a decline in January 
      for the metric, which tends to be a key indicator of restaurant chains&#39; 
      health.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Last October, McDonald&#39;s faced its first global decline in monthly 
      same-store sales in nearly a decade, causing concern among investors 
      about its ability to maintain its leading position in the fast-food 
      industry.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      McDonald&#39;s has touted that its global scale and mix of value-oriented 
      and higher-priced menu items help it return a profit even during tough 
      economic times. But lately, higher food costs and lower consumer 
      confidence have hurt the once-resilient restaurant chain. Meanwhile, its 
      rivals, such as Burger King Worldwide Inc. (BKW) and Wendy&#39;s Co. (WEN), 
      are intensifying competition with revamped menus and marketing campaigns.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      McDonald&#39;s Chief Executive Don Thompson says that the company&#39;s top- and 
      bottom-line growth will &quot;remain pressured&quot; in the near term, but adds 
      that, &quot;moving forward, we remain focused on seizing the long-term 
      opportunities in the global marketplace by leveraging our competitive 
      advantages ... to navigate the current environment.&quot;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      McDonald&#39;s shares were recently up a fraction in Wednesday&#39;s premarket 
      trading to $93.23. So far this year, the stock has rebounded about 5%, 
      after ending 2012 with a cumulative loss of nearly 10%.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      In the recent quarter, McDonald&#39;s improved its operating margin to 31.6% 
      from 31.1% the prior year, surprising the market with the growth.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      McDonald&#39;s global same-store sales increased 0.1%, in line with 
      analysts&#39; expectations, for the fourth quarter. By region, same-store 
      sales rose 0.3% in the U.S.; fell 0.6% in Europe; fell 1.7% in the 
      Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa region; and rose 5.4% in Canada and 
      Latin America.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      McDonald&#39;s reported a profit of $1.4 billion, or $1.38 a share, up from 
      $1.38 billion, or $1.33 a share, a year earlier. Revenue grew 1.9% to 
      $6.95 billion. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters had most recently 
      forecast earnings of $1.33 a share on revenue of $6.89 billion. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/mcdonalds-net-up-14-us-business-rebounds.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-7990042558397949172</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-23T12:01:16.687-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Apple</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Earnings</category><title>Apple May See Earnings Drop, but Outlook is Key</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple Inc. (AAPL) may report its first quarterly earnings decline in 
      nearly 10 years Wednesday afternoon, though investors&#39; attention is 
      already fixated on the company&#39;s outlook amid worries of a rapid 
      slowdown in iPhone 5 demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The launch of so many new products--including the iPhone 5 and iPad 
      mini--in the last part of the year is expected to weigh on profit 
      margins for Apple&#39;s first fiscal quarter, which ended in December.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Still, Apple is expected to post sales growth of 19%, thanks to 
      holiday-fueled demand for those new devices.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      But most attention will be fixed on Apple&#39;s guidance for the March 
      quarter, amid reports that the company is cutting back production of the 
      iPhone 5 less than four months after its launch, suggesting demand may 
      have already peaked.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;It&#39;s all about the guide,&quot; Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray told 
      MarketWatch, speaking about the forecast for the March quarter.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      It remained unclear how much weakness may already be baked into the 
      stock, which has slid nearly 8% just this month and has shed more than 
      one-quarter of its value since peaking above $700 in late September.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Steven Milunovich of UBS cut his price target on the stock to $650 from 
      $700--the shares ended Tuesday at $504.77--but he added that &quot;current 
      levels are overly discounting the demand picture for Apple&#39;s products, 
      as well as future innovations and growth in new markets.&quot;
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;pre&gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;
For the December quarter, the company itself projected a 15% decline in 
      earnings per share when it issued its last quarterly report, though 
      analysts are modeling for a less drastic decline.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Apple is expected to report earnings of $13.47 a share, according to the 
      average estimate from FactSet, compared with earnings of $13.87 a share 
      reported for the same period the previous year.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Revenue is expected to jump 19% to $54.9 billion, according to FactSet 
      estimates.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The iPhone is still expected to drive the lion&#39;s share of sales and 
      earnings for the quarter. Apple is expected to ship about 48 million 
      units of the iPhone in the December period, with some predicting that 
      number could go higher than 50 million.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Most analysts also expect between 22 million and 23 million iPads to 
      ship during the period, thanks to the launch of the iPad mini. Mac 
      shipments are expected to total a little over 5 million units.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Questions about the health of the iPhone business will center on Apple&#39;s 
      forecast for the March quarter.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Analysts are currently predicting earnings of $11.77 a share for the 
      current quarter--a decline of about 4% from the same period last year. 
      Apple is known for guiding below Wall Street&#39;s consensus targets, though 
      analysts say if they go too low this time, they may confirm fears of an 
      iPhone slowdown that could hurt the stock further.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;If they have a big miss for December but a phenomenal guide, the stock 
      will go up,&quot; Mr. Munster said. &quot;But if they crush December but give a 
      bad forecast, the stock is going to go down.&quot;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Mr. Munster currently has a buy rating and $875 price target on Apple, 
      though he has shifted some of his expected iPhone sales in the March 
      quarter to the December period. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/apple-may-see-earnings-drop-but-outlook.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-6987740607032222254</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-23T11:38:29.231-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Earnings</category><title>This Earnings Season, Company Revenue Is Up to Snuff</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Companies&#39; sales look like they are starting to recover from a six-month 
      slump.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      So far this quarter, 66% of companies have reported revenue higher than 
      Wall Street expected, according to Thomson Reuters. While that is 
      slightly above the historical percentage--an average of 62% have beaten 
      sales expectations since 2002--it constitutes a shift from the previous 
      two quarters.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;This is an especially large reversal from recent quarters for sales 
      beats,&quot; said Savita Subramanian, a U.S. equity strategist with Bank of 
      AmericaMerrill Lynch, in a note to clients. Sales growth is &quot;crucial&quot; 
      this quarter, she added, since companies have &quot;already lean cost 
      structures.&quot;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Sales were dismal in the second and third quarters of last year, when 
      more companies missed analyst expectations for sales than exceeded them.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      In fact, sales actually fell in the third quarter, declining 0.8% from 
      the same quarter the previous year. It was the first time that had 
      happened since 2009. The aggregate sales of all companies in the 
      Standard &amp;amp; Poor&#39;s 500-stock index came in 1.1% below analysts&#39; 
      expectations, according to Thomson.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      In the third quarter shares responded more to whether companies beat 
      sales estimates than earnings estimates for the first time since 2009, 
      according to Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch. For the companies that beat 
      sales estimates, shares made bigger gains than they had since the bank 
      started tracking that data nearly a decade ago.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      It isn&#39;t clear whether that trend will stick for fourth-quarter reports. 
      PNC Financial Services Group Inc. (PNC) beat Wall Street estimates on 
      sales, but not earnings, and saw shares gain 3.7% on its report, on a 
      day when indexes rallied broadly.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Tuesday, Google Inc. (GOOG) beat earnings estimates but not sales, and 
      shares still jumped 6.5% Wednesday, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average 
      and Nasdaq Composite Index climbed but the S&amp;amp;P 500 remained mostly flat.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      While companies have been reporting surprisingly strong sales, those 
      surprises come amid lowered expectations for corporate sales. Before 
      earnings reports began, analysts expected 1.9% fourth-quarter revenue 
      growth from the previous year. In April 2012, analysts expected nearly 
      four times that percentage, looking for 7.2% sales growth.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      And earnings season is still young. Ninety-nine companies in the 
      Standard &amp;amp; Poor&#39;s 500-stock index have reported earnings, so nearly 
      four-fifths of the companies in the index have yet to report. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/this-earnings-season-company-revenue-is.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-3527040833155736842</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-16T07:25:33.177-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Airline Sector</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Earnings</category><title>AMR Swings to 4th-Quarter Profit on Tax Benefit; Posts Annual Loss of $1.88 Billion</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
AMR Corp. (AAMRQ) swung to a fourth-quarter profit as the parent of 
American Airlines posted a net benefit of $350 million from an income tax 
benefit and the settlement of a commercial dispute. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
Still the carrier posted an annual loss of $1.88 billion, mostly on 
a net $1.7 billion in reorganization-related and other charges, and expects that 
its first-quarter capacity will be 1.7% lower than during the year-earlier 
period. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
AMR&#39;s fourth-quarter results were hit by operational disruptions 
amid impacts from a flurry of pilot sick calls and maintenance issues as well as 
impacts from superstorm Sandy and an early November snowstorm in the Northeast. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
The Fort Worth, Texas-based airline has been preparing to decide on 
whether to pursue a merger with US Airways Group Inc. (LCC) or to try to emerge 
from bankruptcy protection as an independent company. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
With American&#39;s financial performance improving and restructuring 
steps nearing completion, US Airways made a second merger proposal in 
mid-November that remains under discussion. A merger could create the largest 
U.S. airline by traffic, surpassing United Continental Holdings Inc. (UAL). 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&quot;Our momentum is growing toward emerging as a strong, healthy and 
vibrant competitor,&quot; said AMR Chairman and Chief Executive Tom Horton. &quot;In fact, 
with what we have accomplished, we expect to show strong results beginning in 
the first quarter of 2013.&quot; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
For the quarter, AMR reported a profit of $262 million, compared 
with a year-earlier loss of $1.1 billion. Excluding reorganization-related 
charges and other items, the adjusted loss was $88 million in the latest 
quarter, compared with an adjusted loss of $209 million a year earlier. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
Revenue eased 0.3% to $5.94 billion amid declines in cargo and 
other revenue. Revenue was nearly flat at American Airlines and edged up 0.8% at 
regional affiliates. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
Consolidated passenger traffic declined 0.3% in the quarter, while 
capacity was up 0.2%. Load factor--a measure of plane fullness--declined to 81% 
from 81.4%. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
Consolidated passenger revenue per available seat mile was flat and 
consolidated passenger yield, representing average fares paid, increased 0.5%. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
Fuel expenses, including hedging impacts, rose 6.6%.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;p&quot;&gt;
Source: Dow Jones&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/amr-swings-to-4th-quarter-profit-on-tax.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-878774553340312317</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-15T11:08:31.784-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Retail</category><title>U.S. Retail Sales Climb in Dec.; N.Y. Manufacturing Falls</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;U.S. retail sales rose more than expected in December as holiday 
      shoppers appeared to shrug off fiscal-cliff worries, though future gains 
      could be limited as workers&#39; paychecks are set to shrink.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Retail and food-service sales increased 0.5% in the final month of 2012 
      to a seasonally adjusted $415.70 billion, the Commerce Department said 
      Tuesday. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires had expected just a 
      0.2% rise.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Consumers shelled out more on autos, furniture, personal care and dining 
      out, but sustaining retail growth will be a challenge as payroll taxes 
      increase for most Americans this month.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;The fourth quarter ended on a stronger footing than previously 
      thought,&quot; said Dan Greenhaus, chief global strategist at BTIG LLC. 
      However, &quot;nothing in today&#39;s data does anything to dispel the notion 
      that consumer spending in the first half of 2013 should be quite weak,&quot; 
      he added.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      In a last-minute fiscal-cliff deal that held income taxes steady for all 
      but the highest earners, Congress allowed a temporary cut in Social 
      Security withholdings to expire, meaning that Social Security taxes have 
      reverted to 6.2% of salary from the temporary 4.2%. Smaller paychecks 
      could hamper future consumer spending, which accounts for about 
      two-thirds of demand in the U.S. economy.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      But in December, consumers continued to buy despite surveys that showed 
      consumer confidence was waning. Motor vehicles and parts sales rose 
      1.6%. Excluding autos, retail sales were up 0.3%. Gasoline sales fell 
      during the month as pump prices retreated.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Declining gasoline and food costs helped push wholesale prices lower, a 
      Labor Department report showed Tuesday.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The producer price index, which measures how much manufacturers and 
      wholesalers pay for finished goods, decreased a seasonally adjusted 0.2% 
      in December, as food prices fell 0.9%, and overall energy costs, which 
      include gasoline, slid 0.3%. Excluding volatile food and energy costs, 
      producer prices increased 0.1%.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Economists had forecast overall producer prices to fall 0.1%.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York&#39;s Empire State 
      Manufacturing Survey released Tuesday showed manufacturing activity in 
      the region is still contracting.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The Empire State&#39;s business-conditions index fell to -7.78 from a 
      revised -7.30, in December. A reading below zero suggests contraction. 
      Economists had expected the latest index to improve to -2.0.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      The Empire subindexes were almost all in negative territory this month, 
      a bad omen for the factory sector at the start of the new year.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;We will see if the other January surveys reported over the next few 
      weeks echo the weakness of the Empire State survey or if they give 
      credence to the idea that the manufacturing sector has gained some 
      traction lately,&quot; JPMorgan Chase economist Daniel Silver said.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Finally, a separate Commerce Department report Tuesday showed U.S. 
      business inventories advanced 0.3% to a seasonally adjusted $1.622 
      trillion in November, and sales rose 1.0% to a seasonally adjusted 
      $1.272 trillion.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Increasing stocks at auto dealerships and furniture stores helped drive 
      the inventory gain. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/us-retail-sales-climb-in-dec-ny.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-1289820299083766724</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-15T06:27:00.886-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Watchlist</category><title>Scans - 15th January 2013</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
AAMRQ - Top short on any weak bounce.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=aamrq&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=318&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=320623368&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=aamrq&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=318&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=320623368&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AVTC - This is a classic breakout. Unfortunately I am long-term short and holding my short painfully.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=avtc&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7629217&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1582064862&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=avtc&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7629217&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1582064862&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BIOL - Watching this one for a parabolic move to take a short position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011513/BIOLc0dl0921.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011513/BIOLc0dl0921.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NENE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=nene&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=6644686&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=118420999&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=nene&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=6644686&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=118420999&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UNXL - This one is getting choppy and might not be great trader. Just watching for scalp mode short.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011513/UNXLc0dl0923.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011513/UNXLc0dl0923.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GRZG - This one is running up as round #2. Accumulating short position on every bounce.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=grzg&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7505051&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1454655551&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=grzg&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7505051&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1454655551&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PSON - How long will this OTC land stock survive? I am holding my long-term short on this one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=pson&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=3800267&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=673444988&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=pson&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=3800267&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=673444988&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/scans-15th-january-2013.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-1021233669725431788</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-14T09:38:38.222-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Service Sector</category><title>UPS, TNT Deal Falls Apart</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp; United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) said Monday it has abandoned its 
      protracted, $6.8 billion bid to take over smaller Dutch parcel-delivery 
      company TNT Express NV (TNTEY), after encountering unexpectedly stiff 
      objections to the deal from the European Commission&#39;s antitrust 
      regulator.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Despite months of negotiations, UPS said it expects the Commission to 
      block the proposed acquisition after a meeting with the antitrust body 
      of the European Union&#39;s executive arm last Friday.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      UPS had originally expected to receive approval for the deal after a 
      first phase review, but the process dragged on, highlighting the 
      Commission&#39;s concerns about future competition in the market for 
      overnight deliveries of parcels in Europe. The acquisition, which would 
      have been the biggest in UPS&#39;s 105-year history, was announced in March 
      last year.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The U.S. firm had offered remedies on Nov. 29, and revised its proposal 
      twice to overcome the Commission&#39;s concerns, it said.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Negotiations with the Commission continued into the new year, with UPS&#39;s 
      hopes increasingly riding on whether it could convince the regulator 
      that sales of UPS and TNT assets to DPD, a small parcel-delivery firm 
      controlled by French state-owned postal group La Poste, might create a 
      credible new European competitor to meet competition concerns.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;We are extremely disappointed with the EC&#39;s position. We proposed 
      significant and tangible remedies designed to address the EC&#39;s concerns 
      with the transaction,&quot; said UPS Chief Executive Scott Davis.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      UPS had offered 9.5 euros ($12.67) a share for the Dutch firm, which was 
      split from Dutch postal company PostNL under pressure from shareholders 
      who argued the express business would be an interesting acquisition 
      target for its U.S. rivals. After UPS had announced its bid for TNT, 
      shareholders speculated on a counter bid from FedEx Corp. (FDX), which 
      didn&#39;t emerge.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The Commission&#39;s tough stance on the UPS-TNT deal echoes a similar 
      position it took in objecting to the $17 billion merger between Deutsche 
      Borse and NYSE Euronext (NYX) early last year largely because it was 
      worried about the combined companies&#39; dominant position in a particular 
      segment of financial services, the exchange-trade derivatives market. 
      For UPS, the Commission&#39;s concerns focused on the lack of competition in 
      the overnight parcel-delivery segment if it acquired TNT.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Still, in between its objections to the big securities exchanges and 
      logistics deals, the Commission did approve Universal Music Group&#39;s $1.9 
      billion of EMI Group PLC&#39;s recorded music division last July. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/ups-tnt-deal-falls-apart.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-5480499301351119232</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-14T09:36:43.060-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Apple</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Technology Sector</category><title>Apple Cuts Orders for iPhone Parts as Demand Slips</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Apple cuts orders for iPhone 5 components due to weaker-than-expected 
      demand, people familiar with the situation say. iPhone 5 screens for January-March quarter have dropped roughly half 
      of what the company had previously planned to order, they say Apple Inc. (AAPL) has cut its orders for components for the iPhone 5 due 
      to weaker-than-expected demand, people familiar with the situation said 
      Monday, indicating sales of the latest smartphone haven&#39;t been as strong 
      as previously anticipated.&lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Apple&#39;s orders for iPhone 5 screens for the January-March quarter, for 
      example, have dropped to roughly half of what the company had previously 
      planned to order, the people said.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      The Cupertino, Calif., company has also cut orders for components other 
      than screens, according to one of the people.
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple notified the suppliers of the order cut last month, the people 
      said. The move comes as the company has been facing greater challenges from 
      Samsung Electronics Co. and other makers of smartphones powered by 
      Google Inc.&#39;s Android operating system. While Apple has set the agenda 
      for the smartphone market since it released its first iPhone in 2007, 
      South Korea&#39;s Samsung, which sells many Android-based models at various 
      price points, has already overtaken the U.S. company as the world&#39;s 
      largest smartphone vendor by market share. Demand is also growing for 
      inexpensive smartphones from Chinese makers such as Huawei Technologies 
      Co.&lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      While the popularity of iPhones and iPads has been boosting Apple&#39;s 
      earnings and investor expectations over the past few years, there have 
      been concerns in recent quarters about how long the growth momentum can 
      continue. Apple&#39;s stock price, which peaked at about $705.07 in 
      September, closed Friday at $520.30, down 0.6%.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Some analysts have mentioned possible order cuts at suppliers and raised 
      questions about demand for the iPhone 5.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Apple may have made particularly large iPhone 5 orders to suppliers for 
      the October-December quarter, because of earlier concerns about 
      manufacturing difficulties with some components such as screens, said 
      Sanford Bernstein analyst Alberto Moel.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Citigroup last month lowered its rating for Apple to Neutral from Buy, 
      citing concerns about iPhone order cuts. The brokerage noted that a 
      sharp increase in iPhone 5 production during the October-December period 
      may have left Apple with more inventory than expected. Still, it also 
      said that &quot;good not great&quot; demand is likely a factor behind order cuts.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      &quot;It is unlikely that Apple is cutting orders in a &#39;great&#39; demand 
      environment,&quot; Citigroup analysts said in the Dec. 16 report.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Apple representatives weren&#39;t immediately available for comment. In the 2012 third quarter, Apple held 14.6% of world-wide smartphone 
      shipments, down from a peak of 23% in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the 
      first quarter of 2012, according to IDC.&lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Samsung&#39;s market share, meanwhile, rose to 31.3% in the third quarter of 
      2012, compared with 8.8% in the third quarter of 2010. The Korean 
      company said earlier this month that it expects to report another record 
      operating profit for the fourth quarter of 2012, capping its best year 
      ever amid strong sales of its Galaxy line of smartphones. The company 
      expects an operating profit equivalent to between $8.1 billion and $8.5 
      billion for the three months ended in December.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Apple is slated to report earnings later this month. The iPhone 5, released in September, represents Apple&#39;s effort to 
      maintain its strong position amid intensifying competition. The latest 
      model comes with a longer, four-inch screen compared with the 3.5-inch 
      screens used in all previous iPhone models.&lt;br /&gt;

    
      While the iPhone remains dominant in the U.S., other major markets such 
      as China are becoming increasingly important for the company&#39;s continued 
      growth.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Last week, Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook met with China Mobile Ltd. 
      Chairman Xi Guohua to discuss cooperation, as the U.S. company tries to 
      gain access to the world&#39;s largest mobile carrier with more than 700 
      million subscribers.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    &lt;br /&gt;

      Japan&#39;s Sharp Corp. and Japan Display Co. and South Korea&#39;s LG Display 
      Co. are the three suppliers of the screens, according to people with 
      knowledge of the matter. When the iPhone 5 was launched, there were 
      concerns that suppliers might not be able to produce enough to keep up 
      with demand.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Apple&#39;s cut in orders may also affect first-quarter sales of component 
      makers, some of which are largely dependent on the U.S. company. The 
      fact that some iPhone components are highly customized makes it 
      difficult for suppliers to find alternative buyers in a short time 
      frame. Sharp, one of the suppliers of the screens, has been struggling 
      financially with a cash crunch and losses from its television operations.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Japan&#39;s Nikkei reported earlier Monday that Apple has slashed its orders 
      for iPhone 5 components. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/apple-cuts-orders-for-iphone-parts-as.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-9042983356426470488</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-14T02:10:48.443-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stock Picks</category><title>Scans - 14th January 2013</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
AAMRQ - Great squeezer. Looking to short this one into any big parabolic move. Ideally would love the 1.90s to short into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=aamrq&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=318&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1341712461&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=aamrq&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=318&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1341712461&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TELK - Get mid-day spike along with volume. Won&#39;t touch this one yet on the short side. Let it show signs of weakness first. Ideally looking for morning spike and afternoon fade to short into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/TELKc0dl0430.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/TELKc0dl0430.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
APT - Nice 2 day rally. Just watching this one for now. Need a bigger bounce to interest me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/APTc0dl0430.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/APTc0dl0430.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FREE - Took a short position on trend reversal and volume decline. Will cover into any panic. This one could base off around 0.30 and start rallying again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/FREEc0dl0436.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/FREEc0dl0436.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NENE - 6 days of run-up. Setting up nicely for a short trade soon. No rush though. Let it first show signs of weakness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=nene&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=6644686&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1807860627&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=nene&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=6644686&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1807860627&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AVTC - I have an open short position on this one. This trade isn&#39;t working as expected. Probably will cover into any sell-off. It has based nicely around $4.00 and trying to go higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=avtc&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7629217&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1033713773&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=avtc&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7629217&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1033713773&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RJET - Just watching. Don&#39;t like this slow grind up. Need a parabolic move to interest me on the short-side.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/RJETc0dl0444.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011413/RJETc0dl0444.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PSON - OTC land stock. Surprisingly holding up after a brief sell-off from 1.10s. I am short this position and would love to add on any more bounces. Might box against my shorts if $1.00 can hold up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=pson&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=3800267&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1488187002&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=pson&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=3800267&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1488187002&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GRZG - Another OTC land stock that is slowly grinding up for round #2. I am long-term short on this one and will likely add to my position on further bounce.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=grzg&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7505051&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1466085190&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=grzg&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=7505051&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1466085190&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/scans-14th-january-2013.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-5587817635315964048</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-11T09:39:01.847-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stock Picks</category><title>Stock Watch - Bio Nitrogen Corp (BION)</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 14.633333206176758px; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;&quot;&gt;Bio Nitrogen Corporation (BION) operates as a biotechnology company and offers production of urea for sale as fertilizer. It owns technologies for the conversion of biomass into urea fertilizer. The company distributes its products through wholesale and retail channels to the agricultural sector, as well as to the commercial and industrial sectors. The company was formerly known as BIO-SNG Technologies International Corp and changed its name to Bio Nitrogen Corporation in May 2011. The company was incorporated in 2011 and is based in Doral, Florida.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 14.633333206176758px; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;BION has had an impressive run from 0.05 to 0.40s which is almost 10x run-up. This also presented an excellent short-selling opportunity. I am currently short this position at 0.30 and plan to hold this few more days, covering in the high 10s. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=bion&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=8311776&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1338929863&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;452&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=bion&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=3&amp;amp;sid=8311776&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1338929863&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=510&amp;amp;width=720&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/stock-watch-bio-nitrogen-corp-bion.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-8022018116585617785</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-11T03:48:48.072-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Watchlist</category><title>Scans - 11th January 2013</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
ORCT has nice run-up. Looking for this one to settle and reverse trend before short entry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/ORCTc0dl0631.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;308&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/ORCTc0dl0631.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watching MY for a good entry. Missed this one completely yesterday. Has pulled back alot. Maybe no trade there. Just watching.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/MYc0dl0637.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/MYc0dl0637.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FREE had a sick bounce from the lows. Up to 40cents from 10cents. Short this one over-night. Will look to add more on weakness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/FREEc0dl0636.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/FREEc0dl0636.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HGSH has become illiquid. Strictly watching for a good short entry on more weakness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/HGSHc0dl0638.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/HGSHc0dl0638.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEWL faded nicely from 2.60s yesterday. Missed playing this one short yesterday. Waiting for a bounce to take a short position on this one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/NEWLc0dl0638.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/NEWLc0dl0638.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PERI has gapped nicely and still rallying. However the volume has been fading and could show signs of slowdown soon. Might provide good opportunity on short-side for a quick scalp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/PERIc0dl0639.png&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;310&quot; src=&quot;http://finviz.com/publish/011113/PERIc0dl0639.png&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PSON is a scam-land stock. Showed weakness earlier this weak, but recovered it and looking to make new high. Will look to box this one for a while to take advantage on the long side against my long-term short.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=pson&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=2&amp;amp;sid=3800267&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1980919409&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=335&amp;amp;width=579&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; imageanchor=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;&quot;&gt;&lt;img border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;370&quot; src=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&amp;amp;symb=pson&amp;amp;uf=0&amp;amp;type=4&amp;amp;size=2&amp;amp;sid=3800267&amp;amp;style=320&amp;amp;freq=1&amp;amp;entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&amp;amp;time=7&amp;amp;rand=1980919409&amp;amp;compidx=aaaaa%3a0&amp;amp;ma=0&amp;amp;maval=9&amp;amp;lf=1&amp;amp;lf2=0&amp;amp;lf3=0&amp;amp;height=335&amp;amp;width=579&amp;amp;mocktick=1&quot; width=&quot;640&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/scans-11th-january-2013.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-3823053138407069554</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-10T18:05:14.467-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Finance Sector</category><title>American Express to Cut 5,400 Jobs</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American Express Co. (AXP) will eliminate 8.5% of its staff in the 
      credit-card lender&#39;s biggest cost cuts in recent years as it works to 
      shore up its business in light of a tough global economy and rejigger 
      its travel business to better compete in an increasingly digital 
      environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unexpected cuts, announced late Thursday, will cost the company $400 
      million, mainly tied to severance payments. The lender also will pay 
      $342 million tied to its cardholder rewards program and pay $153 million 
      in refunds to customers related to ongoing regulatory reviews of its 
      business.
    &lt;br /&gt;
The costs come just months after the world&#39;s largest credit-card issuer 
      by spending agreed to pay $127.5 million, including $85 million in 
      customer refunds, to settle allegations by the Consumer Financial 
      Protection Bureau, Federal Reserve and other banking regulators that it 
      engaged in unlawful debt-collection practices and mismarketed certain 
      products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6535983.2533;sz=200x200;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802464048;pid=23275126;usg=AFHzDLsjZwa81Ov_7y1pAqvDlHxx2R7teA;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.officemax.com%252Ftechnology%252Fwireless-phone-accessories%252Fwireless-phone-speakers-and-docks%252Fproduct-prod4070366%253Fcm_mmc%253DPerformics-_-Technology-_-Wireless%252520Phone%252520Accessories-_-Wireless%252520Phone%252520Speakers%252520and%252520Docks%2526ci_src%253D14110944%2526ci_sku%253D23275126;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.officemax.com%2Fcatalog%2Fimages%2F397x353%2F23275126i_01.jpg;width=200;height=177&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American Express, like other credit-card companies, has benefited from a 
      turnaround in borrower behavior that has led to loan losses. The lender, 
      traditionally known for its well-heeled customer base, bounced back from 
      the financial crisis more quickly than its peers thanks in large part to 
      its focus on affluent borrowers who use their cards frequently but 
      typically pay their bills on time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under Chief Executive Ken Chenault, who has led American Express since 
      2001, the company had strayed from its roots by rolling out new card 
      products aimed at new types of customers, including younger consumers. 
      AmEx revved up its push into the credit-card business, rolling out new 
      cards that allowed customers to carry a balance from month to month. 
      That thrust the company into frenzied competition against scores of card 
      issuers and bank-owned debit cards, which were catching on with young 
      consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a surge in unemployment made it difficult for borrowers to pay their 
      bills on time, leading to higher losses during the financial crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While losses have improved substantially, the company, along with its 
      competitors, has been hit by deleveraging by consumers, who have grown 
      more conservative about racking up debt since the recession as they work 
      to get their personal finances in order. That has crimped the revenue 
      lenders earn from finance charges and other fees.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the cuts are related to the company&#39;s global travel business, 
      shifting more services to digital channels to improve efficiency. The 
      company said it would eliminate 5,400 jobs, or about 8.5% of its head 
      count.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the company said the cuts will be offset by hiring for some new 
      positions, and it expects its head count to be down by 4% to 6% by the 
      end of this year from the current base of 63,500 when including those 
      hires.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cuts, which will be made over the coming year, prompted the company 
      to record a $400 million charge in the fourth quarter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;We must keep evolving our business to become more efficient, adapt to 
      changing customer preferences and to increase our capacity to invest in 
      growth,&quot; Mr. Chenault said during a conference call to discuss the cuts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The actions will help the company limit operating expense increases to 
      below 3% for the next two years, Mr. Chenault said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;The expense reduction...is helpful, but at the same time I don&#39;t think 
      that it&#39;s too much of a difference versus what we had modeled for 
      expense growth over the next year or two,&quot; said Donald Fandetti, an 
      analyst with Citigroup Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The company said cardholder spending held up during the fourth quarter, 
      despite the negative impact of Hurricane Sandy. Its so-called billed 
      business increased 8% in the fourth quarter, up from 6% in the third 
      quarter on a reported basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also said it would record $342 million in expenses related to its 
      cardholder rewards program after determining the rate at which its 
      customers redeem points earned on purchases is higher than previously 
      calculated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Separately, it also is refunding $153 million to cardholders related to 
      late fees, finance charges and bonus rewards for certain customers. Part 
      of the refunds--$33 million--relates to debt-collection issues 
      previously disclosed as part of the regulatory action filed by the CFPB 
      and other agencies in October.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American Express strives to serve customers &quot;accurately and to always 
      fulfill our promises,&quot; Mr. Chenault said. &quot;Our aspiration is to meet 
      these objectives 100% of the time, but problems can and do arise, and 
      when they do, we address them.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moves resulted in a profit of $637 million, or 56 cents a share, in 
      the fourth quarter. Excluding the charges, the company would have posted 
      a profit of $1.2 billion, or $1.09 a share. Analysts polled by Thomson 
      Reuters were expecting earnings of $1.06 a share.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The company&#39;s shares were down 0.5% at $60.50 in after-hours trading 
      Thursday. The shares have risen about 5% in the past three months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/american-express-to-cut-5400-jobs.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-1243146773983641997</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-10T17:59:23.867-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Auto Sector</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IPO</category><title>Chrysler Could Be Worth Up To $13.5 Billion In IPO</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
  
    &lt;br /&gt;

      Chrysler Group LLC, which could be heading for an initial public 
      offering, could be worth anywhere from $9 billion to $13.5 billion on 
      the open market, according to analysts reports.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      The auto maker&#39;s valuation has come into question because of a dispute 
      between its majority shareholder, Fiat SpA (FIATY, F.MI), and a United 
      Auto Worker&#39;s union trust fund that owns a 41.5% stake in the company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      On Wednesday, the trust fund, which provides health-care coverage for 
      retired auto workers, presented Chrysler with a registration demand, 
      calling on the company to initiate the process for holding an IPO. The 
      union trust wants Chrysler to register 16.6% of its shares. It was given 
      the right to demand it register shares as part of a 2009 agreement that 
      helped Chrysler emerge from bankruptcy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      The move came amid an ongoing court dispute between Chrysler&#39;s majority 
      owner, Fiat SpA, and the trust over the pricing of the Chrysler shares. 
      The trust is formally known as the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Fiat is trying to use a series of call options on the fund&#39;s shares to 
      buy up a 16.6% stake in Chrysler.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Last year, it triggered the first of the call options, offering $139.7 
      million for a 3.3% stake, a sum that would value all of Chrysler at 
      about $4.2 billion. The union trust countered, asking for $343 million, 
      setting Chrysler&#39;s value of $10.3 billion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      On the open market, though, Chrysler could fetch a market value of $13.5 
      billion, according to Richard Hilgert, a Chicago-based analyst for 
      Morningstar Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;Fiat is still getting the stock cheap,&quot; said Mr. Hilgert, even if it 
      ends up paying the trust&#39;s price.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      USB, in a report released in November, valued Chrysler at $9 billion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      This month, Fiat exercised a second call option, proposing to pay $198 
      million for another 3.3% stake. Fiat sued the trust in September, 
      claiming it refused to turn over the shares.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Mr. Hilgert said it&#39;s unlikely there will be an IPO. &quot;This is merely a 
      chip on the table to gain leverage over Fiat to raise the price,&quot; he 
      said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      By initiating the process, Chrysler will be forced to seek a valuation 
      on the company from investment bankers, Mr. Hilgert said. And the union 
      trust can then use that in their case against Fiat, he added.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      &quot;You can still retain an investment banker without filing a registration 
      statement,&quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

    
      Chrysler said in a statement Wednesday it would comply with the demand, 
      but that there is &quot;no assurance&quot; this will result in an IPO. A 
      spokeswoman for the union&#39;s trust has declined to comment.
    &lt;br /&gt;

    
      Fiat is eager to raise its stake in Chrysler to facilitate the merger of 
      the two companies, but an IPO could be costly and serve as a distraction 
      for the Italian auto maker as it tries to turn around its money-losing 
      operations in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Dow Jones &lt;br /&gt;

  

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/chrysler-could-be-worth-up-to-135.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-4409058699449087172</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-10T08:20:00.615-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Technology Sector</category><title>Nokia Sees Better Fourth Quarter on Brisk Lumia Sales</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
Nokia Corp. (NOK) Thursday said brisk sales of its new Lumia smartphone 
      line up has contributed to a better- than-expected result in the fourth 
      quarter, sending shares sharply higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;320&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6675098.3947;sz=320x320;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802463762;pid=NV8095520;usg=AFHzDLvWiNe6iLBy3mXa1X6zArNVHvjHpA;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.technooutlet.com%252Fnv8095520.html%253Fmr%253AtrackingCode%253DA9A180D4-4D04-E211-8FF3-001B21BCC0BC%2526mr%253AreferralID%253DNA;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fsite.unbeatablesale.com%2Fimg330%2Fnv8095520.gif;width=188;height=320&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;320&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;320&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6533655.2550;sz=320x320;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802463918;pid=61322;usg=AFHzDLurJVxUn51oCrs11yIu7eo3eyDevw;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.abt.com%252Fproduct%252F61322%252FAT%2526T-339492.html;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.abt.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fproducts%2FBDP_Images%2Fbig_0721875.jpg;width=320;height=276&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;320&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nokia shipped 4.4 million Lumia devices in the fourth quarter, bringing 
      total smartphone shippments to 6.6 million devices, the first increase 
      in smartphone shipment numbers in a year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The company, which is due to report its full fourth-quarter result on 
      Jan. 24, estimates that its main devices and services unit will reach 
      net sales of 3.9 billion euros in the fourth quarter of 2012, down from 
      EUR6 billion the same quarter 2011, while total device shipments is seen 
      at 86.3 million units, down from 113.5 million units compared with a 
      year ago.&lt;br /&gt;
Also contributing to the better-than-expected result was good 
      performance for Nokia&#39;s wireless network joint venture with Siemens, 
      which Nokia said delivered &quot;record underlying profits and a third 
      consecutive quarter of underlying profitability.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a statement, Nokia&#39;s Chief Executive Stephen Elop said he is pleased 
      over Nokia&#39;s &quot;solid&quot; fourth-quarter performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Nokia warned that its first quarter performance is likely to be 
      hit by seasonality and the competitive environment in the mobile 
      industry.
    &lt;br /&gt;
At 1324 GMT shares were trading 17% higher at EUR3.498.
    &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/nokia-sees-better-fourth-quarter-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34886170.post-485987018039786514</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-10T08:21:18.228-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Finance Sector</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mortgage</category><title>Mortgage Rates Mostly Higher in Week</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Average mortgage rates in the U.S. were mostly higher during the past 
      week, while the 30-year fixed rate remained near historic lows, 
      according to mortgage-finance company Freddie Mac (FMCC).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freddie Mac Chief Economist Frank Nothaft said fixed-mortgage rates rose 
      slightly following a positive employment report for December, which 
      showed that the unemployment rate remained at 7.8%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;iframe bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;320&quot; hspace=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; src=&quot;http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N7433.148119.BLOGGEREN/B6675098.3949;sz=320x320;ord=[timestamp]?;lid=41000613802463762;pid=CALC006;usg=AFHzDLsIEsEyMcIS0002OtrRpH3lRiSW-w;adurl=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.unbeatablesale.com%252Fcalc006.html;pubid=612551;imgsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fsite.unbeatablesale.com%2Fimg016%2Fcalc006.jpg;width=194;height=320&quot; vspace=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;320&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the week ended Thursday, the 30-year fixed rate averaged 3.4% 
      compared with 3.34% last week and 3.89% a year earlier. Rates of 15-year 
      fixed mortgages averaged 2.66% compared with 2.64% last week and 3.16% a 
      year earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, 
      averaged 2.67% compared with 2.71% last week and 2.82% last year. 
      One-year Treasury-index ARM rates averaged 2.6% compared with 2.57% a 
      week earlier and 2.76% last year.
    &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;!--
google_ad_client = &quot;pub-0623802741136326&quot;;
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
google_ad_format = &quot;468x60_as&quot;;
google_ad_type = &quot;text&quot;;
google_ad_channel = &quot;&quot;;
//--&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;
  src=&quot;http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js&quot;&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://rantaboutit.blogspot.com/2013/01/s-mortgage-rates-mostly-higher-in-week.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (sJ)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>