Marc Randazza LYING about Crystal Cox Blogger. Marc Randazza Attorney. Marc Randazza

Monica Foster of Porn News Today Brings a Special Report Exposing Randazza Legal Group as Connected to Stalking, Harassing and Using Big Media to Suppress the Freedom of Speech for those Marc Randazza wants to silence for his own personal agenda.

2012-04-11T19:00:00.000-07:00

Randazza Legal Group, Owned by Marc J. Randazza Allegedly involved in Cyber Bully and Stalking Ring. If you have any information regarding anything in this post, please Email me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com.

James Malcom DeVoy, Employed by Freedom of Speech Attorney Marc Randazza, also general counsel to Liberty Media, seems to be connected with attacks on those within the porn industry via stalking, harassing and cyber bullying, this allegedly is connected to the Los Angeles Porn Industry.

Marc Randazza, in a last ditch effort, it seems is attacking me, Blogger Crystal Cox, in mainstream media in order to draw the attention away from the Corruption I am exposing regarding Kevin Padrick or Obsidian Finance Group, David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Eliot Bernstein's stolen Technology in the iViewit Scandal and the issues I bring to "light" over Philip Falcone's Lightsquared.

Randazza Legal Group, Owned by Marc J. Randazza is Allegedly involved in a massive pressuring tactic to silence those who expose the Corruption in the Porn Industry. There seems to be tons of blogging, twittering, harassing of all kinds to pressure victims to suicide and to silence

A Monica Foster Special Edition seems to

shed some light on this very important issue.

"DeVoy advising Whiteacre in regards to Anti-Porn activist Shelley Lubben As I stated before, while investigating into who I've identified as the sources of my own harassment, stalking, cyberbulling and defamation of which myself and family members have suffered (beginning 2010), I found several public communications on Twitter between my stalkers and someone with the screen name JmDiv.

The blog address: http://Randazza.Wordpress.com was listed on the JmDiv twitter profile so I took a look at it. It didn't take long for me to realize that this man was employed by Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

After a quick skim of the employee (team) roster of Randazza.com I came to learn that JmDiV on twitter is J. (James / Jay) Malcolm DeVoy - an attorney licensed in Nevada and Wisconsin."

Source Of Monica Foster Porn Industry News Quote Above and Full Article
http://pornnewstoday.blogspot.com/2012/04/is-porn-industry-and-freedom-of-speech.html

"Is Marc Randazza a hypocrite? From my perspective, yes. Is Marc Randazza dismissive? In my opinion absolutely. According to his email communications with me, none of the information I presented him with (much of which is a part of this blog posting) is a big deal and he went as far as to call my concerns "silly".

Is Randazza manipulating the media to gain sympathy to deter attention from other matters, issues and affiliations of which he may not want attention brought to? I think it's very possible considering the actions of his employee along with his employee's affiliations.

Marc Randazza did offer to grant me an interview with him, but truthfully, considering that I don't know nature of his relationships with his employees or with my stalkers, I'm deathly afraid of him. I am deathly afraid to be within physical proximity of all of the individuals I've noted James DeVoy communicating with for that matter - Sean Tompkins, Michael Whiteacre and Michael Fattorosi considering the continued harassment and threats on my life I receive from Tompkins and Whiteacre to this day."

Source of Above Quote
http://pornnewstoday.blogspot.com/2012/04/is-porn-industry-and-freedom-of-speech.html

Click Here and Read Monica Foster's Amazing Expose' on the tactics used in the Porn Industry to Bully, Harass, Defame, Threaten and Intimidate.

Start a Blog

Expose Corruption

Email Me a Link

SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

I WILL GET YOU FOUND !!

Are you a Randazza Legal Group Victim, a Corbin Fisher Lawsuit Victim, a Liberty Media Victim? Are you being attacked, harassed, stalked, or is your family in danger over corruption and dirty tactics in the porn industry? Email your Tip to me Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger, Industry Whistle Blower at WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com and/or SavvyBroker@yahoo.com

Liberty Media Attorney Marc Randazza is trying to Suppress the Truth about iViewit and Lightsquared.

2012-04-11T17:33:00.000-07:00

Digital Watermarking Technology, Corbin Fisher and the Use of the iViewit Technology without the inventors getting paid, Liberty Holdings Inc. and just what it will cost them when they have to pay for a decade of using the iViewit Technology.

All this and more are reasons Marc Randazza is attacking Blogger Crystal Cox.

"Liberty Media Corporation (commonly referred to as Liberty Media or Liberty) is an American media conglomerate and the control is exercised by company Chairman John C. Malone, who owns a majority of the voting shares."
Source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Media

Got a Tip Regarding Liberty Media John C. Malone? Email Me !!!!
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

"Liberty Media began in 1991 as a spin-off of TCI, an American cable-television group. Peter Barton, hired by TCI's Malone, served as president until retiring in April 1997 to start an investment firm and spend time with his family.[3]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Media

TCI, Tele-Communications Inc. is connected to AT&T, Comcast,Charter Communications Bell Atlantic, Bob Magness and John Malone.

Remember folks ATT is involved in the IViewit Scandal, and ATT is involved in connection with Clearwire's Craig McCaw to STOP Lightsquared from bringing Internet service to all rural areas and cheaper then Verizon, Clearwire, and

John Deere Tractor, Rockwell Collins, Senator Grassley, Trimble Navigation and more are involved in this conspiracy to keep Philip Falcone from making Lightsquared a reality for us all to have cheaper, better internet service.

http://www.philipfalcone.com/

http://www.mssspectrum.com/

http://www.lightsquared.com/

Got a Tip?

"On March 13, 1998, Liberty Media Group and TCI Group announced the merger of Encore and STARZ! into a single company – Encore Media Group"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Media

These are both connected to iViewit Technology and to the Conspiracy to STOP Lightsquared, Harbinger Capital Philip Falcone.

More Connected to Liberty Media and involved in running Lightsquared OUT and in suppressing the TRUTH about the iViewit Technology.

Sprint, ATT, Liberty Livewire, Todd-AO which provided audio and video post-production services, David Beddow, Discovery Channel,DirectTV, News Corporation, QVC, Time Warner,Liberty Digital, Liberty Satellite & Technology, UnitedGlobalCom, Liberty Global, Liberty completed a purchase of Green Bay, Wisconsin, television station WFRV-TV, and satellite station WJMN-TV in Escanaba, Michigan, which serves the Marquette, Michigan, market. The deal was part of a swap of 7.59 million shares of common stock in CBS, WFRV, WJMN, Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Sirius XM Radio Inc.,Liberty Media,Sirius XM, Sirius XM .

They ALL use the iViewit Technology and owe iViewit Inventors Billions on Top of Billions. And many of them are involved in the Lightsquared scandal to STOP fair competition of a New Wireless company what had already invested Billions and had FCC approval and was STOPPED by many of the folks in this post, so they can keep charging to much for wireless and phone service with no fair competion. And they have breaks in service that Lightsquared would not.

Lightsquared and the iViewit Technology, I ROAR about, in defense of and Marc Randazza is protecting Big Media and Tech Companies that STOLE the IViewit Technology and have used it for FREE for over a Decade, and Marc Randazza is helping to protect the STOPPING of Lightsquared.

Liberty Media WHINES bigtime over those who download their movies, yet they don't even pay for the technology that the movies's are being made on. And then have the nerve to go after Kim Dotcom.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/02/kim-dotcom-mega-upload-warner-bros.html

More on Warner Bros.
http://www.crystalcox.com/search?q=warner+bros

More on iViewit
http://www.iviewit.tv/

Other Assets

Liberty Media is a prominent investor. In addition to its own offerings, the company also owns the stock of several major media and telecommunication companies. As of September 1, 2011,^[37] primarily through Liberty Capital unless noted, Liberty has assets of the following companies not listed above:

AOL Inc. (1% through Liberty Capital and 2% through Liberty Interactive)
Barnes and Noble Inc. (17%)
CenturyLink Inc. (1%)
Crown Media Holdings Inc. (3%)
Current Communications Group LLC. (8% through Liberty Partners and Liberty Associated Partners)
Jingle Networks Inc. (9% through Liberty Partners and Liberty Associated Partners)
Kroenke Arena Company LLC. (7%)
Live Nation Entertainment Inc. (21%)
Mobile Streams Inc. (16%)

Motorola Mobility Inc. (2%)
Motorola Solutions Inc. (2%)
Priceline.com Inc. (1%)
Sirius XM Radio Inc. (40%)
Sprint Nextel Corporation (2%)
Time Warner Cable Inc. (1% through Liberty Capital and 2% through Liberty Interactive)
Time Warner Inc. (1% through Liberty Capital and 2% through Liberty Interactive)
Viacom Inc. (1%)

Source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Media

ALL are using the iViewit Technology

This is ALL the Reason that Liberty Media Attorney Marc Randazza is attacking Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox with flat out LIES. The point is to scare me into stopping my appeal in Obsidian V. Cox. See they don't want me getting more media, or the TRUTH to come out, see then the iViewit story hits the headlines and they owed Billions a year for over a Decade to the inventors of ALL video they have been using.

Got a Whistle Blower Tip?

SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Blogger Crystal Cox Alleges that Attorney Marc Randazza is creating a Media Firestorm to Suppress information Regarding the iViewit Technology and the Porn Industry's use of the iViewit Invention in all video for over a decade, without paying the real inventors of the technology.

2012-04-10T14:27:00.000-07:00

I Believe that Marc Randazza got the call, as he told me from top people in the Porn Industry, and they said "what are you going to do about it" as Marc Randazza told me. And this call was not about what are you going to do to help this woman, this case so that it does not affect the Free Speech, and First Amendment Rights of the porn industry.

This call was to get Marc Randazza to represent me, in my appeal, so that Marc Randazza could negotiate a deal with Obsidian Finance Group and their Attorney and then with me Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger. A deal that would look good for us all and therefore STOP me from going to Appeal.

See, what if I win the appeal and get the label as "Credible" instead of "Bat Shit Crazy". See then the real issue comes up, see then I would look Credible in my 3 years of promoting Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technologies story. And this is the "Real Agenda" this is a 13 Trillion Dollar Video Technology that the Porn Industry has been using for over a decade. Stolen by Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein and the gang at MPEG LA and involving many other Law Firms, Individuals and Companies. Part of the iViewit Technology was patented illegally by the MoviLink gang that seems to by lynching me in support of Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza's offer to represent me back fired, as I did not like the way he treated me and I chose another Lawyer. This has led to an online brawl, with the real prize being the iViewit Technology.

Also Note that Tonkon Torp is connected to Enron whom collapsed mainly to do with deals over the Iviewit Technology. Proskauer Rose Law Firm is connected to all of this, so is Warner Bros., Sony, Foley and Lardner, Greenberg Trauig, Arthur Anderson ( where the Star witness of Obsidian V. Cox Gary of PNW Tax Advisors Portland use to work), and also SGI, Time Warner Inc., Intel Corp, Volvo, Blockbuster, Lockheed Martin, and hundred more are involved in the iViewit Technology Theft. The iViewit Technology is worth 13 Trillion Dollars and all video has used this technology for over a decade, the inventors did not get any rights or profit what so ever. They did get their Volvo bombed, and many other torturous acts upon them.

See if Marc Randazza could stop the Appeal, this saves the Big Porn companies Millions on top of Millions over the use of a technology that the inventors did not get paid for. If Marc Randazza can discredit me now, then WOW is he in good, with the Biggest Tech and Media Companies in the World. Saves them 13 Trillion Dollars, no Exaggeration.

More about the iViewit Story

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

More on this coming soon, look deep into the iViewit Story.

Crystal Cox Anti-Corruption Blogger Speaks Out Regarding whom Advised Her that it may not be Good For Bloggers and Others if She Appeals in the Obsidian V. Cox Defamation Case.

2012-04-07T11:52:00.000-07:00

There seems to be some question as to who discussed with me that it may be a good idea to NOT Appeal the Obsidian Vs. Cox Case.

I had wrote this on my Marc Randazza Blog awhile Back.

"Marc Randazza told me that if I appeal it MAY create Bad Law and that maybe I should consider NOT appealing so that my case can be used to Lobby for others in changing laws. I was in agreement, and told Marc Randazza that I simply wanted advice from those surrounding the First Amendment Rights Issue and the First Amendment Bar, so that I could do what was best for all Bloggers, Citizens Journalists and the First Amendment Rights of All. Marc Randazza said he was very glad to hear that, and it made him want to work with me even more."

http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-corbin-fisher-marc.html

In the Video Below when I talk about First Amendment Bar experts recommending that I do not file appeal for possible lobbying efforts, it was Marc Randazza I was talking about. At this time I had spoke with Marc Randazza and was waiting for him to get back to me. I thought Marc Randazza was a First Amendment Expert and I wanted to do what was right for the Greater Good, as I made it VERY clear on our phone call.

After the call, Though, I found out, instead of getting back to me on my case, he assumed he was my Lawyer and was already negotiating with the Plaintiff without my permission, which violated my rights.

Here is the Video, This Interview was Dec. 12th 2011, Toward the End I discuss possibly not filing appeal at the recommendation of First Amendment Experts. I was talking about Marc Randazza and ONLY Marc Randazza. He claimed he had discussed this issue in great depth with other First Amendment Bar Issues. I also state plainly that if I appeal it will ONLY be with an Attorney.

More on the Obsidian Finance Group Suing Anti-Corruption Blogger Crystal Cox. The Justice System is Broken. Answering Questions from Readers.

2012-04-07T11:29:00.001-07:00

Here is a Link to the Documents in the Video, that I Gave the Court
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2011/12/in-obsidian-v-cox-i-provided.html

Here is Exhibit 520 that I gave Judge Marco Hernandez, Portland Oregon To Show the Source of the Post I was on Trial For. Which included the above press release.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/111075477/Exhibit-520-Statement-of-Source-of-Blog-Post

My Statement Regarding Extortion Allegations of David Aman, Tonkon Torp Plaintiff
http://www.davidcarrsucks.com/2012/04/privileged-communication-between.html

Regarding Marc Randazza Attorney Accusing Me of Extortion, Emails Between Crystal Cox and Marc Randazza.
http://markrandazza.blogspot.com/2012/04/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-claims-that.html

Marc Randazza Continues to Lie About Crystal Cox Blogger. Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Attorney. Marc Randazza is Defaming Crystal Cox with "Actual Malice". Marc Randazza is Flat Out Lying, Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group.

2012-04-07T01:51:00.005-07:00

Crystal Cox Blogger being LIED about by Marc Randazza Attorney, in the name of alleged Free Speech. Look Deep, as Marc Randazza stirs up a hornets nest to help hide the Corruption Behind the Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox Blogger Defamation Case.

Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher Attorney, Randazza Legal Group - Marc Randazza starts a WAR with Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and STOMPS on Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All
in the process.

This Marc Randazza Blog Post is a Few Tidbits from the Crystal Cox Blogger Vs. Marc Randazza Freedom of Speech Attorney. It is a Flat Out Search Engine Brawl !!!

Marc Randazza, Celebrity First Amendment Attorney, has his Panties in a Wad over Crystal Cox Blogger (Not Porn Star) rejecting him as her Attorney, and Marc Randazza, is fighting back by conspiring with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set up Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza ( Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher ) has not done his homework on Obsidian Finance Group, or Kevin Padrick to determine if there a reason to investigate, or to believe that indeed Blogger Crystal Cox does have those Journalistic Standards or Ethics that Marc Randazza spoke of, and Questioned in our conversations.

See, Marc Randazza ( Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher ) went to school to be a journalist, and does not seem to be interested in journalistic adventures, such as reading, or Marc Randazza would easily see that Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group are in some major conflicts of interest; massive lobbying and solar tax credits issue, People in Lake County Oregon are very upset at their property rights being run over by Obsidian Finance Group, HomeStreet bank out of Washington filed an Objection to the Fees of Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, There is history of questionable behavior over the Longview Fibre Deal and Aloha Lumber, and the Oregon Trail Issues.

Marc Randazza ( Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher ) is so upset that Blogger Crystal Cox bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza cannot see the forest for the trees (aKa, being BITTER and Butthurt because I bought Marc Randazza .com, and refused to turn over Marc Randazza .com at his demands, oh the nerve of me to Stand my Groung

Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of his hurt ego.

Marc Randazza’s ego is leading him around. Oh, and about the Greater Good, Marc Randazza told Crystal Cox he was impressed with her, me, for standing up for and even being willing to not file an appeal for the Greater Good if that’s what he took. Marc Randazza told blogger Crystal Cox that it was very encouraging to hear that she would choose, to not appeal if that was best for lobby efforts and the good of all Bloggers and Citizen Journalists.

And yet Marc Randazza, in a pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox is now working against the First Amendment Rights of all by working with the Plaintiff’s Camp in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to set up Blogger Crystal Cox, and to throw a fit over a Domain name that he was not smart enough to buy, Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza, does not seem to care who is guilty of what. All Marc Randazza can seem to see is red, because Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him for being a controlling ass and making deals behind her back and telling the WORLD that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox Blogger, when clearly he did not.

So in his rage, Marc Randazza has staged a Subpoena, even though he contacted the Plaintiff and offered himself up to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a Lesson. See, Marc Randazza is working with David Aman of Tonkon Torp in attempting to silence blogger Crystal Cox who is continuing to expose; Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Obsidian Renewables, Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice, Judge Randall Dunn, Perkins Coie Law Firm and Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Law Firm and Tom Stilley and Susan Ford, Miller Nash Law Firm, US Bankruptcy Code Violations in the Summit Bankruptcy, and events surrounding the Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon.

Ok So What Happened? How did I, Crystal Cox Blogger begin this pissing match with Marc Randazza, Porn Star Attorney Extraordinaire? Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher is a big baby because I bought a Dotcom, he does not approve of me buying, so Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher is seeking revenge. Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher is pretending to be subpoenad, when no way that is true, as I have registered hundreds upon hundreds of peoples names as dotcoms over the years and David Aman of Tonkon Torp is not Subpoening them in my Asset Seize Party at Tonkon Torp For Plaintiff Obsidian Finance Group.

See, after my 2.5 Million Dollar Set Up to “Attempt” to Hide the Secrets of Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp and other Big Oregon Law Firms and Corporations, well, one of my Bloggers contacted Marc Randazza and I agreed to a 3 way conversation to interview Marc Randazza, and he had agreed with my Blogger to talk with me in the possibility of taking my case.

During this call Marc Randazza said that if he took the case he would need money for a certain amount of costs and that it would be an expensive case to file appeal. He said, in a case like this he would normally charge at least $75,000. However, he was considering Pro Bono due to the Media attention I was getting, but even in that would need cost for copies and to be in a hotel in California for the appeal, if he or someone he recommended were to take the case.

Marc Randazza gave many signs during this call that Marc Randazza would most likely not represent me.

During this call Marc Randazza said he was concerned of the “record” and had to take a look at it before deciding. I said that was a responsible thing to do, he said he would look at my documents and get back to me, he did not get back to me, yet told others he represented me, more on that in a bit.

Marc Randazza told me on this call that I had “made a mess,” which I found very slamming as what I do is for the Greater Good and what I was exposing was and is on the right side of the law and certainly on the right side of the Moral Compass.

Marc Randazza saying this, let me know that he had no idea that what I did was a ‘calling,’ it was for massive change and a good thing to bring attention to this issue. Marc Randazza treated me as if I had made a “mess” and with complete disrespect. When in fact, I am creating “Media” and “Legal” attention to something that is VERY important for the Greater Good of ALL.

Marc Randazza said that he was concerned with my “Journalistic Standards”, SHOCKING isn't it, a Porn King Attorney representing folks that "Society" judges and Marc Randazza is judging and slamming my “Journalistic Standards”? Anyway this disrespectful comment led me to believe that Marc Randazza seemed to have been eating up the bad information about me, this was another sign to me that Marc Randazza was not going to represent me.

I am an Investigative Blogger. And a Very Good ONE. For Over 3 years, I have read contracts, insider emails, legal briefs, documents, LLC Agreements, Legal Filings and I listened to Audio’s of Court Sessions, watched videos of depositions and insider meetings and I interviewed, and yes took notes from the side of the Debtors, Investors, Creditors and more in the Summit Bankruptcy, deeper than any other news outlet. I have covered this story in depth and linked to lots of proof and documentation.

The Media Bloggers Association should pay close attention, as what I was doing was exposing documents, and linking to those documents, and this is what most all bloggers do. The fact that I curse, Capitalize in Odd Places and have my own "Independent Style", well that make me legally "media" as well, and it does not change the Facts. I do what ALL good Investigative Bloggers, Alternative News and Citizen Journalists Do.

Big Media wants to shut me up, so they lie about me, and for some reason Marc Randazza ate up what Big Media said about me, even though it was NOT True. Marc Randazza did not care about my side. Marc Randazza simply ran me over with his personal opinions and agenda. Marc Randazza says if I were not so UnEthical he may hire me. What? Marc Randazza has no idea what Ethical Is.

Marc Randazza told me that he used to work for Big Media but now he works for bloggers and porn stars, because Marc Randazza claimed that Big Media had the agenda of creating a Monopoly so they make more money. Yet NOW Marc Randazza is working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox.

Marc Randazza told me that he would have to talk to his existing clients, such as The Media Association of Bloggers, to see if there was a conflict before deciding to represent me or not. Marc Randazza claimed he would get back to me on this. Instead, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff’s side and tried to cut a deal WITHOUT my Consent, without “getting back to me” and without discussing if he represented me, wanted to represent me or if there was a Conflict.

Meanwhile Marc Randazza, of The Media Bloggers Association (MBA) , told lots of people in the “business” that he represented Blogger Crystal Cox, yet that was NOT True. I had agreed to work with another Lawyer and this created a situation that caused me stress, and almost lost me the Lawyer I really wanted.

Did Marc Randazza have to “discuss” a conflict with the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) in any way BEFORE Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff’s side and tried to work out a deal, as if he represented me? I was told at that time by other members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was talking with the Plaintiff’s side and trying to work out some arrangement regarding money, or a change to case law. I was Pro Se for a year and I wrote over 50 Court Filed Documents myself. I was and AM in the KNOW on my Case and Marc Randazza simply left me out, as if I had no brain, no rights and with total disrespect for me, Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza simply and certainly unethically took it upon himself to contact the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian V. Cox, without my knowledge and without getting back to me on if he wanted to work with me or not, Marc Randazza simply left me hanging with time running out and was working behind my back on a deal. Is this Legal? Well it is certainly NOT Ethical and certainly shows no respect for bloggers nor the First Amendment Rights that Marc Randazza, Allegedly wants to protect.

Also on that first phone call Marc Randazza said he thought it was funny that the Plaintiff thinks they can get $2.5 Million out of me, and now Marc Randazza has offered himself up to help them get any assets they think I have and ESPECIALLY that $10 Domain Name, Marc Randazza .com, that dumb shit Marc Randazza NEVER Registered for himself. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to take Domain Names, which is my only way to make a living, and all in the name of “Constitutional Rights” What? This makes no sense and is NOT True.

Marc Randazza is Vindictive, plain and simply. He was not chosen in the BIGGEST case that the blogsphere has EVER seen regarding one blogger, and a case that will change laws and is already a world wide phenomena and that blogger, me, had the nerve to buy Marc Randazza .com and to even suggest that Marc Randazza hire her to do PR for him. Marc Randazza is so mad that Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of Marc Randazza’s EGO.

In one of Marc Randazza’s last communications to me he said “do you really want to make an enemy of me?” Marc Randazza thinks that a blogger, a woman being smarter than him is making him an enemy.

So Marc Randazza is on a mission to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson and be “Deposed” to rant about me to the Plaintiff to attempt to further quash my “Free Speech” and First Amendment Rights, and thereby affecting all BLOGGERS and Alternative Media Worldwide.

Marc Randazza told me that if I appeal it MAY create Bad Law and that maybe I should consider NOT appealing so that my case can be used to Lobby for others in changing laws. I was in agreement, and told Marc Randazza that I simply wanted advice from those surrounding the First Amendment Rights Issue and the First Amendment Bar, so that I could do what was best for all Bloggers, Citizens Journalists and the First Amendment Rights of All. Marc Randazza said he was very glad to hear that, and it made him want to work with me even more.

Marc Randazza said, if I take your case then my Ethical Duty is to you, yet Marc Randazza acted as if he had taken my case, without talking to me about it, and was already negotiating with the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Blogger Crystal Cox.

To me, Crystal Cox, this says that Marc Randazza was already acting as my attorney, and did have an Ethical Duty to me to not disclose my stance, emails, or private conversations with him. Yet Marc Randazza contacted the “Other” side to Negotiate, and that was in December. Now Marc Randazza is using information I gave him in a Deposition that Marc Randazza is giving the "Plaintiff" to attempt to put me in my place and to take a $10 Domain Name that Marc Randazza was not smart enough to buy, and this, in my opinion, is an Ethical Breach, if not Plain Ol’ Illegal.

Last December I found out that Marc Randazza was Negotiating with the Plaintiff’s Side OF MY LEGAL CASE without my PERMISSION. I was told this by other members of the First Amendment Bar that wanted to represent me. They had heard that Marc Randazza represented me and even spoke with Marc Randazza, and he had flat out claimed to be representing me, yet Marc Randazza had not told me he was even still considering representing me, Blogger Crystal Cox.

Crystal Cox was told by other Attorneys that I needed to let Marc Randazza know that he did not represent me, because Marc Randazza was telling everybody that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox on Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox (I have Emails and more to Prove this).

Marc Randazza has so little respect for potential clients that Marc Randazza simply does as

Marc Randazza pleases without his client’s or potential client’s knowledge.

Can I Sue Marc Randazza for trying to make a deal, acting as if he was my attorney without my consent? I certainly can file Bar Complaints in NV, CA, MA, FL, and AZ to Start.

Marc Randazza is now part of a Witch Hunt to discredit blogger Crystal Cox, in effort to protect Big Corporations such as Obsidian Finance Group, Pacific Power, Government Oversight people such as Judge Randall Dunn and Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice and Law Firms such as Tonkon Torp, Sussman Shank and Perkins Coie.

Marc Randazza is sacrificing the Free Speech rights of ALL in Marc Randazza’s own personal Ego trip over a blogger that bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is NOT a man for the rights of Free Speech. Marc Randazza is a man for the personal EGO Trip of Marc Randazza.

So how is Marc Randazza working with the “Bad Guys” and on the Opposite Side of Free Speech?

Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to set me up. Marc Randazza is pretending to be under subpoena and pretending to have no choice, but the truth is that Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff, and Marc Randazza initiated dealing with them against me because his EGO is bent that I did not CHOOSE him and I bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is even flying to Portland to be deposed at the Tonkon Torp Law Firm. Gee I wonder whose dime this is on? And all this because they want to Silence a Blogger Exposing Corruption and to spite a Pro Se Defendant who went with a different lawyer and bought the whiny baby’s name as a dotcom.

Marc Randazza is on an Ego Trip and it affects all Bloggers, yet Marc Randazza acts as if he works for the best interest of Bloggers and for the best interest of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) .

Marc Randazza does not work for the best interest of Bloggers, nor of the Best interest of the First Amendmant. Marc Randazza is on an Ego trip for Marc Randazza and so in creating a war over a domain name that he was too dumb to buy and in being pissed off because I told him I did not want him to represent me, well now Marc Randazza is working directly against the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers.

So Who Is Marc Randazza ?

Marc Randazza , Marc John Randazza of Randazza Legal Group with offices Miami, Phoenix & Toronto. Marc Randazza is an Attorney Licensed in Arizona, Nevada, California, Massachusetts, and Florida.

Marc Randazza claims to fight for the First Amendment rights of all. Marc Randazza is an Attorney specializing in protecting porn and online gambling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza )

According to wikipedia.org, Marc Randazza’s first case was representing a fraternity at Boston University, when the brothers of that fraternity were accused of destroying a house they had rented and accused of other misconduct. Marc Randazza then began practicing in Florida as a real estate attorney. Marc Randazza seems to have started right out working for the wrong side of the law and certainly the wrong side of the law in representing drunken fraternity brother’s who seem to have destroyed some one’s property.

Marc Randazza, according to wikipedia, “Soon thereafter, moved to Orlando, Florida where his practice in First Amendment and media law expanded. He started representing defendants in SLAPP suits, pornography businesses, and protesters, in often unpopular constitutional law matters.” Marc Randazza seems to have started right out of the gate on his First Amendment Soap Box defending those seemingly on the wrong side of the law and the wrong side of the moral compass. Yet Marc Randazza slams me for “Journalistic Standards” and works directly against a blogger whom he had acted as if he once worked for in this same manner. Geez, WHAT a Mess Ol’ Marc Randazza has made of all this.

Marc Randazza is a Public Figure, indeed having been in debates on Fox news and other television and having worked for Big Media as Marc Randazza told me. So why are there not more bloggers EXPOSING Marc Randazza ? Well I guess, Marc Randazza really was for blogger’s rights, until he got all BENT over Blogger Crystal Cox and decided to be part of taking down the Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers.

According to wikipedia, “"Randazza has a practice that primarily focuses on the areas of First Amendment litigation, adult entertainment, trademark and copyright litigation, and domain name arbitration disputes." So you see Marc Randazza, has to save face and punish me somehow because I am Smarter than Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza represented people in WIPO cases yet claims he does not care about my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose Law Firm out of New York, in which I Legally won the right to own the names in dispute. This is a case precedence of my Legal Right to buy Marc Randazza .com, and though Marc Randazza is some big deal in Domain Name Arbitration, Marc Randazza did not have the Brains to buy Marc Randazza dotcom.

WOW, guess all that PORN has fried ol’ Marc Randazza’s brain so he has now teamed up with the Evil David Aman of Tonkon Torp who, along with his “Plaintiff” Kevin Padrick was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal and named in the Objection to Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy in which several insiders filed to Object to the Massive Conflicts of Interest and Outrageous Fees involving Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick

More on that at the Link Below for Now (if Links are Broken due to stolen Domain Names, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com for a copy of the Objection to Fees in Summit and in the Homestreet Bank Scandal involving Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, as well as other documents of those who really do and have had issue with Obsidian and Kevin Padrick )

http://www.ObjectionToFees.com/

Sure must be a low blow to the Massive Ego of Marc Randazza to have been trumped by a blogger, and a Woman. Marc Randazza is one of those classic examples of Attorneys who simply shut you up and toss you in the back seat of a legal case as if he is smarter and can handle it, which obviously Marc Randazza is not smarter then blogger Crystal Cox even if Marc Randazza is conspiring to set up Blogger Crystal Cox to protect his Ego.

According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza serves as General Counsel to Corbin Fisher, who apparently is smart enough to own their dotcom, careful though there is a warning on the home page of naked men engaging in sex acts. Guess I better not buy CorbinFisherSucks.com, though it sounds like a fun name to have, but it seems that Corbin Fisher (an Adult Media Company) is a smart company owning their own dotcom and all. Too bad Corbin Fisher’s general counsel Dickhead Marc Randazza was not so smart. I think Blogger “Crystal Cox” would make a much better General Counsel for Corbin Fisher, don’t You?

According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza has “represented a number of well-known adult entertainment companies including Kink.com, Bang Bus, and Milf Hunter. He also represents media businesses such as BME and bloggers in SLAPP suits.” So the Porn King Attorney Mark Randazza is all for Freedom of Speech, ... well EVERYTHING, except a Woman Being Smarter than Him and buying a dotcom of MarcRandazza.com. Marc Randazza can’t have that, so he is off to Portland to a Deposition of the Asset’s of Crystal Cox in order to conspire to set up Blogger Crystal Cox and teach her, me a lesson for being SMARTER than Ego Maniac Marc Randazza.

Maybe his buddy David Aman will Take the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after my Judgement and Maybe David Aman, attorney for Obsidian Finance Group, will simply GIVE the domain name Marc Randazza .com to Marc Randazza then he can STOP Crying over it.

Marc Randazza is Directly against the First Amendment Rights of Blogger Crystal Cox in her buying Marc Randazza .com. Yet Marc Randazza defends others in outrageous domain name ownership case.

Though Marc Randazza tells me he don’t care about WIPO, yes Marc Randazza actually said that in an email to Blogger Crystal Cox, anyway, According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza “has represented the defendant in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, a case before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) filed by political commentator Glenn Beck, ...The WIPO arbitrator ruled against Beck in the case, and in favor of Randazza's client.” Yet when I told Marc Randazza that I had represented myself in a WIPO case over an Attorney’s name and won, he said he did not care. Yet it sure seems that Marc Randazza is proud of his WIPO case win, in my opinion, of course.

SO what was the Beck V. Eiland-Hall case, and just what was Marc Randazza defending as a Free Speech right? Well the Domain name in that dispute was, (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") .

Marc Randazza says I have no right to own a domain name that corresponds to his name, Geez Marc Randazza did not think that in this domain name (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") I Guess that is just those double standards of Mr. Marc Randazza popping up again.

So Marc Randazza fought for the right for his client to own the domain name, "www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" - as you see at this link http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody

Hypocrite Marc Randazza thinks it is OK for his client to buy and own a sick domain name such as that, that accuses a man of rape and murder, but it is not OK for me to own Marc Randazza .com. Seems a bit of a double standard, don't you think? It is not ok to own that kind of a domain name, it is sick, it accuses a man of rape and murder and yet is defended by Marc Randazza. That site seems to be gone now, so what happened, who bought it? What was the "pay off," the circumstance? Got a Tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza knows all about WIPO, and Copyrights, and Intellectual Property so why not just take the Domain Name? Why get on the Bandwagon of the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to Stomp on the Free Speech Rights of All Citizen Journalists and to deliberately STOMP on the First Amendment Rights of every United States Citizen who my case, Obsidian V. Cox now represents in Free Speech Issues?

You see if Asshole Marc Randazza had a Right to take the Domain Name then he would right?

So why work with the "Bad Guys" to steal the domain name, because he wants to make a point and steal the Domain Name he was not smart enough to buy. And all with the Collateral Damage of the Rights of Free Speech of Every Blogger World Wide, and of the First Amendment Rights of Everyone, Period?

Marc Randazza thinks, as you will see in the emails, that I should have asked him before I bought Marc Randazza Dotcom, gee did his client ask Glen Beck if they could buy "GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" ? I bet NOT.

Marc Randazza is simply pissed off at a Woman who did not want to let him represent her, ME, even For Free, because he was an arrogant aggressive ass to me and because he went behind my back making deals BEFORE I even agreed to be his client. I have more respect for myself than to let a BULLY, Lying, Thug Such as Marc Randazza represent me, even if for FREE.

Marc Randazza is so mad at me for not choosing him, and at me, Blogger Crystal Cox for buying the Asshole's name as a dotcom, that Marc Randazza is making the World his Collateral Damage in a Marc Randazza pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox.

Thing is, no matter what you Pricks set me up for, the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH, the Criminal in all this REMAINS to be the Criminal, Kevin Padrick remains to be suspect of White Collar Crimes, and all those involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal will remain to have been involved, and your foul play, ethics violations and double standards will one day bite you in the ASS. As the TRUTH has a way of rising to the TOP. I have Faith.

Marc Randazza is all for Free Speech and First Amendment Rights, but only in his selfish, immoral world of what Free Speech is and that does not seem to include citizen journalists exposing corruption or Internet Marketers who are Smarter then Marc Randazza and buy his dotcom.

Marc Randazza (Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher) - obviously needs Internet Marketing help, so I offered it to him as I do everyone I can. It’s what I do, I would like to make money at it. Marc Randazza has his panties so wound up around his you know what, he just can’t think. So instead of defending the First Amendment and those trying to expose corruption, Marc Randazza contacts the Plaintiff to work against the Pro Se First Amendment Defendant and on the Opposite Side of First Amendment Rights. And why? Because I bought MarcRandazza.com and he was too dumb to buy it so now he wants to conspire to silence me.

Does Marc Randazza know that David Aman is alleged to be under an FBI Investigation over his connection to a man in Montana who tried to intimidate me to get me to take David Aman’s “Settlement Communication” which offered me a deal, if I commit a crime “ and just swear that people committed a crime that they did not, well then he would generously let me out of a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit, is this Legal?

See That Post Here
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/david-aman-attorney-for-plaintiff-kevin.html

And if you want to order the hearing transcript of the alleged FBI Investigation that hearing is called “Motion to Exclude” it is a matter of court record.

So what ever happens in the WAR between Crystal Cox (not a Porn Star) and Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney fighting for the rights of Porn Stars, and other Adult Entertainment First Amendment rights . . . well whatever happens, my intention on my first talk with Marc Randazza was to listen with an open mind, in the possibility of Marc Randazza representing me, and buying MarcRandazza.com, well that is just what I do, I buy the names of those who are part of stories that I come across or involve me. The domain name was available, and so I bought it. I am for hire for PR, and Search Engine Marketing, I offer that service.

Marc Randazza is a Bully, and is now working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox as Marc Randazza does not believe I have a legal right to own or to have bought MarcRandazza.com, a domain name which you would think ol’ Marc Randazza would have owned long ago.

So why hasn’t Marc Randazza simply filed a WIPO complaint if Marc Randazza has the legal right to own Marc Randazza .com ? Well you see it seems like more fun and more vindictive for Marc Randazza to work on the opposite side of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights and instead set up blogger Crystal Cox with his Good Ol’ Buddies at Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in which Marc Randazza attempted to make a deal with them, financially on my behalf BEHIND MY Back and when he did not represent me.

Yes, I am under the impression that back in December, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff to make a deal on my behalf for them to change the judgement so it would not affect the Porn Industry Free Speech, and this was to be in my best interest. And I was told that at that same time Marc Randazza claimed to many in the First Amendment Bar, that he represented me, and yet Marc Randazza had not told me, the “Alleged” Client. In my Opinion, based on my personal experience I do not recommend nor trust Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza, seems to me to work on the OPPOSITE side of Free Speech in order to teach a female investigative blogger a lesson for being smarter than him.

Marc Randazza was not offered the chance to buy Marc Randazza .com, NO WAY. He will only get the name if he files a WIPO complaint, or sucks up to Plaintiff Kevin Padrick and his Attorney David Aman, if they seize the Domain Name and give it to Marc Randazza in some deal possibly made to set up, to silence blogger Crystal Cox for exposing; Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Obsidian Finance Group and their connections to Oregon Solar Credits, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Judge Randall Dunn, Blue Heron Paper Company, Dept. of Justice Pamela Griffith, Perkins Coie Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Susan Ford and Tom Stilley, Miller Nash, Bonneville Power, Lake County Oregon Commissioners, the Bend Oregon D.A. Office.

Marc Randazza claims to be a Copyright Expert, so if there is a Legal Reason that Marc Randazza should get to own Marc Randazza .com that Marc Randazza was to dumb to buy, then why doesn’t big shot Domain Name Arbitration Lawyer Marc Randazza, simply TAKE Marc Randazza .com by force instead of working in the dark, in back alleys and side deals with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, which is looking to be the biggest case of Free Speech For Bloggers that the Blogsphere has ever seen in quite this way?

And if it is NOT Legal to buy Marc Randazza .com if I am not Marc Randazza, then why in the world is it Legal for Godaddy to Sell the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com?

So Liars, Thugs and Thieves, Sue Me, Set Me Up, Do what ever makes you feel better and sleep best at night. Punish me for being Smarter than you are. Still the Truth Remains the Truth, and even if you set me up from some jail time, you are still an asshole and you were still not smart enough to register your own name as dotcom. Enjoy the Game you're Playing with the First Amendment Rights of the Entire World.

You Know Your TRUTH and I know mine.
I Let Go, Let God. It will be What it will be.

Gee I hope that Randazza Legal Group owns Randazza Legal Group .com, as I won a WIPO Case for ProskauerLawFirm.com, you know what WIPO is, right Asshole?

Stay Tuned for Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Part 2 as the Pissing Match Continues. The next Part will have emails between Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Blogger and explanations of communications from my point of view, of course. This will also include my Email to Marc Randazza rejecting him in representing me because Marc Randazza is an arrogant Ass and was disrespectful to me.

Source of Information in this Article - Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza

And from notes of my phone call and emails with Marc Randazza and with other Attorneys of the First Amendment Bar as well as other Internet Research

Got a Tip on Marc Randazza? I would love to know.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, Crystal@CrystalCox.com,
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Marc Randazza is a BUTTHURT Hypocrite. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox, because he is "Butthurt" that Crystal Cox Bought Mark Randazza .com, Yet Marc Randazza says "Butthurt is Butthurt" and No Recourse is ALLOWED for Sandra Fluke, So Why Does Butt Hurt Marc Randazza GET his Pay Day REVENGE?

"Butthurt is not Defamation. Butthurt is Butthurt, and you don't get paid for that in the United States of America. Not on my watch." ~ Marc J. Randazza

Source of Marc J. Randazza Quote
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

WOW, Shocking words from a man who is So "Butthurt" that Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him as her attorney, even if it was for FREE, that he turned on me, threatened to make me his ENEMY and then Sided with the Plaintiff out to Suppress Free Speech for All Bloggers who Do What I Do.

Marc Randazza is So "BUTTHURT" that Blogger Crystal Cox, ME bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza is willing to sacrafice Free Speech for All in Siding with the EVIL Plaintiff in Obsidian Finance Group V. Pro Se Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza has Double Standards on Top of top
of Double Standards.

Marc Randazz is pissed off at Blogger Crystal Cox because I bought Marc Randazza .com, and so he wants "Paid" for "Being Butthurt". And YES in the United States.

Marc Randazza wanted me to give him the Domain Name MarcRandazza.com that he was to DUMB to Buy, this is essentially wanted PAID for being "Butthurt", Right?

By giving him something that did NOT belong to him, so that he would not make me an Enemy. That was his THREAT. So Because I chose to NOT cower to Marc Randazza's Threats, Marc Randazza has contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox and offered to give "testimony", a Deposition, in Effort to Help the Plaintiff Steal Domain Names that I use to make a Living and to flat out SEIZE Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after the $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement Against Me.

Marc Randazza is "BUTTHURT" and "Whiny" because Internet Savvy Crystal Cox Blogger was smarter then Marc Randazza, Alleged First Amendment Attorney, but only when it comes to things other then Marc Randazza's Butthurt EGO.

Marc Randazza is really a "Media Whore" and where there looks to be a high profile Freedom of Speech Case there is Marc Randazza Yammering some Gibberish and pretending it is in the name of Free Speech and the First Amendment. However, NOT when it comes to the Free Speech of Citizen Journalists and Anti-Corruption Bloggers such as Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" is now defending Rush Limbaugh, and pretending it is in the name of Free Speech, while at the same time in secret talks to STOMP on the First Amendment in Obsidian Vs. Cox.

Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" is Yapping on the Rush Limbaugh calling a Woman a Slut and Prostitute Case, because Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" wants attention on him as a celebrity First Amendment Attorney. Thing is that does not mean that Marc Randazza is really for the First Amendment, Free Speech and Constitutional Rights of ALL. FOR Marc Randazza is Not For the Constitutional Rights of Female Blogger Clients such as Me, who DEMAND to be treated with RESPECT, or I will not even let HIM work FOR ME for FREE. There are more important things then MONEY. I have worked for over 6 years, and put my life, ever cent, and gave up everything I knew as my life to Fight for These Victims and I Will Be Damned if I will Let Some, Pompous Arrogant Attorney sit me in the corner and shut me up.

Marc Randazza, "Media Whore", interjecting is Two Cents on the Rush Limbaugh Rant, is simply to drum up business, because he won a case or two, but has sense spent that money and NOW needs to get his nose into High Profile Free Speech Cases to get another Gig. Marc Randazza is NOT Do Gooder for the the Freedom of Speech for All.

Marc Randazza told Blogger Crystal Cox, "you really want to make an enemy of me" and all I, Blogger Crystal Cox, did was Reject Marc Randazza as my attorney because he was pompous, arrogant, self assuming and treated me as if I have no brain. AND I bought a Domain Name that Internet Genius, Domain Name Arbitration Expert, and Alleged Internet Legal Super Star Marc Randazza was to Slow on the Draw to Buy.

Marc Randazza brags that he is the first one that people call in a defamation suit, thing is that is because those people found Marc Randazza in the search engines. Yet Marc Randazza did not have the brains to buy Marc Randazza .com, so now Marc Randazza is butt hurt and working with Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp Law Firm whom single handidly STOMPED on the First Amendment Rights of ALL.

More on Blogger Crystal Cox Vs. Egotistical Ass, Vindictive, Liar, UnEthical, Marc Randazza
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-celebrity-first-amendment.html

More on the Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" defending Rush Limbaugh
for calling a woman a Slut and a Prostitute.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

Got a Tip on First Amendment SCUM Lawyer Marc Randazza?
Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com
Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

More of Me Yammering About Marc Randazza's BULLSHIT
http://MarkRandazza.blogspot.com/

Marc Randazza Talks a Good Game for Freedom of Speech and First Amendment Rights, However Marc Randazza DOES not Walk the Talk when it comes to his own Butthurt EGO Trip and the First Amendment Rights of Others. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite, a Liar, an Asshole and has Violated my First Amendment Rights.

Marc Randazza Emails Blogger Crystal Cox and Demands She Turn over Marc Randazza .com, even though Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and Corbin Fisher, has fought for others to own domain names with people's name and even worse.

Though Marc Randazza knows that Blogger Crystal Cox won a WIPO case involving several Domain Names of Top Lawyers of one of the Worlds Biggest Law Firms, Proskauer Rose, still Marc Randazza threatens me, blogger Crystal Cox, that I if I don't turn over the Domain Name that will make him an enemy. Marc Randazza knows I have every legal and ethical right to have bought and to own Marc Randazza .com, yet Marc Randazza is teaching me a lesson by working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox to steal my Domain Names as Assets, even though a couple of months ago Marc Randazza could have bought Marc Randazza .com for $10.

Marc Randazza is a such a hypocrite as he writes about the Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh Issue and seems to be defending free speech, yet at the same time claims that she is Butthurt and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on His Watch. Yet at the Same Time Marc Randazza is trying to make Blogger Crystal Cox PAY for his Butthurt over not buying his own name as a Dotcom (DotDUMB that Was), anyway now Marc Randazza is headed to Portland Oregon for a March 23 Deposition, one in which I am sure if you check his communications records, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff's Camp to work AGAINST Crystal Cox Blogger, and Against Free Speech.

In Marc Randazza's article regarding Sandra Fluke, Marc Randazza Said this,
"When a plaintiff alleging defamation is a public figure, he or she must show that the allegedly false statements were made with actual malice – that is, knowing falsity, or a reckless disregard for the truth. N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan" SO Marc Randazza is fully aware that in Obsidian V. Cox, Obsidian and Kevin Padrick are Public Figures and I had NO Actual Malice. Marc Randazza spoke with me and told other First Amendment Lawyers that he represented me, Blogger Crystal Cox, and claimed to have been negotiating with the Plaintiff, which was news to me. Now if Marc Randazza claims this did not happen, I am sure the other Attorneys will not lose their career in a perjured deposition to lie for Marc Randazza.

Link to the Butthurt Sandra Fluke / Marc Randazza Article
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh

I want to Sue Marc Randazza, email me at SavvyBroker@yahoo.com to represent me Pro Bono. Surely Marc Randazza has liability insurance for his yaps and threats. And isn't it illegal to act as if he represented me and try and negotiate a deal giving my private information to the Plaintiff, when he had not discussed with me, the "Alleged" Client?

Marc Randazza may flat out lie to you and say he was Subpoenad and did not contact the Plaintiff First, thing is over 6 years I have registered hundreds of "other people's names" as domain names, so why in the world would the Plaintiff Subpoena only ONE. The Truth is that Marc Randazza contacted them to make me, Blogger Crystal Cox, pay for the Marc Randazza Butthurt.

Here is the Article where Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group says that Butthurt is Butthurt, and not defamation and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on his watch.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh even though when it comes to Butthurt Marc Randazza he sure is teaching Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson in what it is to be an "enemy" of the Infamous double talking, hypocritical ASSHOLE Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Defended Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , yet Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards.

Oh and Let's not forget the Ted Klaudt Common Law Copyright Dispute, and check out the Photo that Marc Randazza used for that article, (it is below on the left). In the Ted Klaudt case.

The Headline Reads "Former Rep Ted Klaudt claims "common law copyright" in his name to try and suppress news stories about him raping his kids".

Marc Randazza Says, "We sure do see a lot of intellectual property abuse around here. This has to be the best one yet. Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt claims that he has a "common law copyright" in his name, and thus any news organization or other publication that uses his name must pay him a licensing fee of $500,000."

Yet Marc Randazza feels that he has copyright of his name. So the Name Marc Randazza is a bigger, better name than Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt's name? How does that Work? Marc Randazza is willing to take help the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to take the Domain Names of Blogger Crystal Cox in effort to hide the Secret Deals, Corruption, and Conflicts of Industry, involving Law Firms Tonkon TorpSussman Shank, Perkins Coie and Miller Nash and involving Solar Tax Credits and the Actions of Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick as a Trustee in a $40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy out of Bend Oregon. Marc Randazza is also willing to STOMP on the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of all in helping a Plaintiff that he admitted was certainly hurting Free Speech for All.

In the Ted Klaudt Scandal, Marc Randazza accuses the actions of Ted Klaudt to be simply to stop a "news organization" from informing the public. Which is exactly what I was doing. Obsidian Finance Group had no legal right to be the Trustee, neither did Kevin Padrick, as he was an insider. This case needs investigated and many were harmed and not just financially, lives were ruined. Marc Randazza will now be named in the Federal RICO Complaint I am Filing, as Well as FBI Complaints and Department of Justice Complaints. I have been investigating this story for 4 years, and Butthurt Marc Randazza is now on the side of suppressing information but taking my domain names and siding with the WRONG side First Amendment Rights.

In that Same Article Marc Randazza Says this to Ted Klaudt.
"Guess what Klaudt, you just made yourself even more famous, short eyes."
I Say This to Hypocrite Marc Randazza, "Guess What Fuckhead Marc Randazza, your working with the Bad Guys and you WILL Be even "more famous" as a thug, liar and asshole" But surely that was what you were going for.

Source information for Marc Randazza Article and Marc Randazza Case and Yammer Research

Ted Klaudt Article, Complete with Photo
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/former-rep-ted-klaudt-claims-common-law-copyright-his-name-try-and-suppress-news-stories-a

Rush Limbaugh, Sandra Fluke Research Links

http://www.easternecho.com/index.php/article/2012/03/pointcounterpoint_limbaugh_slut_scandaldebate_hijacked_by_the_left

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/09/megyn-kelly-sandra-fluke-oreilly_n_1334470.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204603004577269491399954950.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/07/patricia-heaton-s-history-of-outbursts-sandra-fluke-attack-no-anomaly.html

http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh
Marc Randazza is a LIAR when He Claims to Love the First Amendment, Marc Randazza only loves the First Amendment when it gets him a JOB.

"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" Case Research Links
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody

http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-on-wrong-side-of-free.html

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
aKa, Marc Randazza ENEMY
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Domainer Crystal Cox, also Investigative BLOGGER Says Flat Out, Mark Randazza is in NO WAY a "Domainer Advocate". Marc Randazza is fighting Domainer Crystal Cox for being Smart Enough to Buy Marc Randazza.com .

This Blog Post Headline Reads "Domainer advocate Marc Randazza on CNN"

Folks this is Flat WRONG. Marc Randazza is NOT on the Side of the Domainer, NO WAY. Marc Randazza has threatened Domainer, Blogger Crystal Cox for Buying Marc Randazza .com (A Domain). Mark Randazza is no Advocate for Domainers nor Free Speech or the First Amendment Rights of All.

Marc Randazza Post Claiming that Marc Randazza is on the Side of Domainers. Marc Randazza is not on the Side of this Domainer. I have been a Domainer sine 2005. I have Been to TRAFFIC, have joined associations over the years and met the biggest players out there. And believe Marc Randazza is NO Advocate for the Domainers. Here is the Blog Quote.

"Las Vegas based attorney Marc Randazza, runs the popular law blog The Legal Satyricon. The blog centers around law, freedom of speech issues, technology and – surprise, surprise – domain names and the universe of issues that bring along, such as cybersquatting, UDRP cases and trademarks.

Distinguished for his sharp sense of humor and licensed to practice in Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts and Nevada, Marc is often a quiet “behind the scenes” domainer advocate.
Today, CNN features Marc Randazza’s stance on the First Amendment and the right to voicing one’s opinion, regardless of how extreme it might be."

Source of Marc Randazza Gibberish
http://domaingang.com/domain-news/domainer-advocate-marc-randazza-on-cnn/

Marc Randazza is Directly Working Against Crystal Cox Domain and Blogger's First Amendment Rights and my rights to "voicing my opinion". As well as my voice exposing documented FACT. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite.

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Industry Whistleblower
ENEMY of Marc Randazza

Marc Randazza ~ now Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, has his buddies blogging about Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group in an attempt for Marc Randazza to hide the Marc Randazza, Crystal Cox Scandal and Massive VIOLATIONS of my Free SPEECH and First Amendment Rights by Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Scandal

Here are Some Marc Randazza Tidbits from this Marc Randazza Love Post
The Quote Posts are in BLUE, and the Source of the Quotes is Listed At the End.

"Marc Randazza sees the Rakofsky suit, and far too many like it, as an attempt to pervert the power of law to the cause of stifling speech. He leapt, almost unbidden, to the defense of the Rakofsky blawgers in need of representation. "

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group is the one attempting to "pervert" power.

Marc Randazza is the KING of Perverting Power.

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group tried to bluff Blogger Crystal Cox and tell me I had no right to own, buy and blog on Marc Randazza . com. Yet, Marc Randazza, defending others in Domain Name Ownership with the actual names of people and domain names themselves that accuse people of horrible acts. This is Ok to Marc Randazza, yet it is not ok for Crystal Cox, Blogger, Domainer to have purchased Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza tried to pull a power trip over Crystal Cox, me and tell me I had no right to own Marc Randazza .com, which is simply NOT True. Marc Randazza STOMPS on my rights of Free Speech, and works against me in a case where if I don't get my case over turned, all BLOGGERS will be affected, no matter what the Lies of David Carr of the New Times is Telling You.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is the biggest case EVER regarding One Individual Blogger, that is Truly Independent, if Marc Randazza and the Plaintiff shut down my voice then this affects all Bloggers till the end of time, or the Internet as we know it.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is truly about a Blogger getting wind of a story and fighting for the victims, selflessly for 4 years and losing everything to stand up for what is right. The Obsidian V. Cox case is a case about finding information, digging through years of documents, getting tips and emails, reading document after documents, interviewing insiders, reading legal filings, reading contracts, listening to court audios, reading court transcripts and EXPOSING the inside details of a 40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is about the Plaintiff, Obsidian Finance Group trying to hide their secrets and what really happened and about David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm protecting the involvement of Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson, David Peterson and David Aman himself in the Summit Bankruptcy. David Aman is still fighting to silence blogger Crystal Cox, because David Aman was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal as you see in the Objection to the Fees filed by several insiders in that case. There was also emails to and with David Aman and the Department of Justice, and with other attorneys involved as they tried to Tell David Aman, Tonkon Torp of what was going on and how violated the rights of creditors and seemed to violate Bankruptcy Code.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, knows that what Crystal Cox Blogger is saying is TRUE, yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm fights to take domain names to shut me down. Thing is Obsidian V. Cox will be overturned, TRUTH will win for REAL over alleged Defamation and investigators will really find out the TRUTH about the Behind the Scenes of the Summit Bankruptcy that they have for over 4 years ignored. David S. Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer knows that blogger Crystal Cox did not have actual malice and in fact had and has actual documents of truth, fact and anyone who can read can see that what Blogger Crystal Cox has and is Exposing has tons of documentation to back it up.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm fought for Kevin Padrick as Trustee in every issue over the Summit Scandal. And David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm even deposed Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung to ask about blogger Crystal Cox, yet did not contact me until 2 years later when I was Sued for 10 Million Dollars for EXPOSING THEM.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm is fighting to this day to try and shut down my blog, and this is to protect David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm and Leon Simson, David Peterson and others at Tonkon Torp, as they were involved in the alleged corruption I am exposing.

More on the above Blog Post Praising Marc Randazza

"I had heard of Marc Randazza prior to being named as a Rakofsky defendant, but I had never had any contact with him. His presence and reputation were known to me through his blog, The Legal Satyricon, and through the blogging of others, such as Scott Greenfield or Ken-at-Popehat who know him firsthand.

Marc Randazza is a zealot, but a zealot of the best kind. His zealotry finds its focus in the First Amendment, and particularly the portions of that Amendment protecting freedom of speech and expression. Speech, without regard to its couth, its coarseness, its wisdom, its dunderheadedness, its cultural value, its tendency to discomfit or offend, is embraced by the First Amendment, and Marc Randazza has devoted his career to its preservation. Like Horatius at the bridge, Marc Randazza stands beside the Sluice of Speech to defend it and to see that its flow stays as wide and as free and as indiscriminate as possible. "

This person seems to really like Marc Randazza, and to have had a good experience with Marc Randazza, I can respect that, thing is the facts of Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox are still the same. Marc Randazza really did violate my rights. Marc Randazza really did tell members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented me, and Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff in my case to negotiate a deal on my behalf that I was not aware of. This violated my rights, gave the bad guys my strategy and inside information and was simply WRONG. Months later Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff and offer to give a Subpoena to TAKE the Domain Names of Blogger, Domainer Crystal Cox in order to help the Plaintiff to silence my voice and the REWARD to Marc Randazza, I Believe, to be, Control over Marc Randazza .com .

Source of Quotes above ...
http://www.declarationsandexclusions.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-marc-randazza-marc-randazza.html

Folks, email me for my story, I plan to post more as soon as I have time, thing is Marc Randazza violated my Constitutional Rights. Marc Randazza went to the "Other Side" in Obsidian V. Cox, after talking to me and Marc Randazza did NOT have my permission. Marc Randazza misled me, and Marc Randazza suggested I not appeal for the Good of Other Bloggers, which I was open to, if that was best, however Turns out Marc Randazza may have gave me bad information that may have affected the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers and Citizen Journalists.

Marc Randazza knows that the Oregon Retraction Laws Apply to Blogger Crystal Cox, Marc Randazza knows that Crystal Cox had no "actual malice" and that I, Blogger Crystal Cox, to this day believe, that there was foul play and illegal behavior in the actions of David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

Check your Facts, they are there, Depose me, Marc Randazza, and all involved, check phone and email records and you will see that indeed Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff without the Defendants approval and Marc Randazza gave the Plaintiff privileged strategy and information regarding Blogger Crystal Cox. Marc Randazza told other member of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox, and that he, Marc Randazza had already spoke with the Plaintiff's side to negotiate a deal. Marc Randazza to these same folks that he represented me and this caused me more stress in my case, as I had to explain what happened with Marc Randazza, and that he did not work for me, even though he was putting in "time and energy" on my case, and acting as my attorney without my permission.

If Marc Randazza lies about all this then it's a feud among Lawyers on who is lying, as I have proof. The Marc Randazza article above, may well be one Marc Randazza opinion or Marc Randazza Experience, Thing Is it is Certainly not my Experience with Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group.

See Marc Randazza, and all reading this, I really am telling the TRUTH and anyone that can read, hear, see, can easily see that TRUTH.

Instead most, including Marc Randazza, simply believe FORBES, the New York Times and the Plaintiff's lies about me, as they fight to cover up $40 Million in Secrets, and this also makes Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp look bad to the Energy Companies they Lobby For, to those who issue Solar Tax Credits, to PacifiCorp, and more.

The Thing is, I am telling the Truth to the best of my ability and have been for years on this same matter. Look at the Summit Objection to the Fees, the Lake County Residents Upset at Obsidian, the Objection to the Fees in Washington filed Against Obsidian Finance Group for the SAME thing that Kevin Padrick did in the Summit Bankruptcy. There is easily proven pattern and history for a Federal RICO Lawsuit. And now Marc Randazza has jumped in the middle of it all in the alleged name of Free Speech and First Amendment rights, yet at the same time Marc Randazza, has violated my Free Speech and First Amendment Rights.

I Trusted Marc Randazza, and he betrayed me, Plain and Simple.

Marc Randazza REFUSES Answering my Questions, though I am Pro Se and Marc Randazza has been Subpoenaed by the Plaintiff, Allegedly.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group Is Painting Crystal Cox in False Light, even though Marc Randazza wanted to represent Crystal Cox Blogger in her "Appeal". Marc Randazza seems to be lying to create a smoke screen and to divert from the real issues and crimes surrounding the Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Crystal Cox Defamation Case (Civil), Turned Extortion Conviction (Criminal)

Marc Randazza offered to buy Marc Randazza.com long ago, though Kashmir Hill of Forbes has the story all wrong, and has not even seen the entire email communication between Blogger Crystal Cox and Marc Randazza nor does she know of the content of the Marc Randazza Crystal Cox phone call.

Anyway, Marc Randazza offered for the Domain Name, then he demanded, both I refused. Then Marc Randazza, to teach me a lesson, called the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to offer Testimony, a Deposition, to set me up for Extortion though I never Extorted Him. This because he was upset over me buying the Domain Name, which is certainly NOT illegal.

AFTER Marc Randazza Joined Forces with the "Bad Guys", the Plaintiff, and I, being my own attorney was given notice of Marc Randazza's Deposition to set me up, then I got upset and AFTER this, I bought several more dotcoms to prove a point, and noticing that Marc Randazza 's wife and daughter's dotcom was available, what better way to make the point of how bad he is at this "Domainer" thing, and how he is NOT the Internet Expert he Claims to Be.

See even after Marc Randazza threatened me for own his dot com and even though he defened Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , still he did not buy the dot com of his beloved, WHAT?

Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards. Was it extortion for the Glen Beck name to be purchased and used attacking Glen Back and accusing him of rape and murder? This Domain Name "implies"that a Young Girl is a "Minor" right? And it accuses a man of a Rape and Murder. This is Ok in the Eyes of Attorney Marc Randazza, but for some reason me Owning MarcRandazza.com is not, nor Owning JenniferRandazza.com and his childs name, which I bought AFTER he joined the plaintiff to PROVE and to prove Point, and I never Published that Information he did that. Popehat.com Kenneth White and Marc Randazza did that with her photo, as did Forbes Kashmir Hill. NOT ME.

Even after the threat to me for buying MarcRandazza.com, he still was to dumb to buy the dotcom of his own wife and child. I wanted to point out that he was a Fraud in his representation to Potential Clients, as I had interviewed Marc Randazza to possibly represent me, and he was so Disrespectful that I chose a better choice for me and for the Entire Blogger V. Journalist, Free Speech, First Amendment Rights Debate. I did not initiate connect with Marc Randazza, nor Him to me, we agreed to talk through the recommendation of another person, one of my Investigative Bloggers, whom was also on the call.

I never "Begged" Marc Randazza to be my Attorney, in FACT I never even asked. I simply took the call in order to feel out my options, and get more information on what I thought to be Experts in the First Amendment Bar. I had already been contacted by the Attorney I did choose and was weighing my options. And trying to learn all I could for best of for all who do what I do, so I could make the right decision on the next step for the Greater Good.

Marc Randazza, almost lost me the Attorney I wanted, because Marc Randazza told the Attorney that he represented me. This was after my Attorney had heard through others of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was representing me.

Those believing I begged him to be my Attorney are Flat Wrong, think about it, why would I do that when I already had what I deem to be the most respected First Amendment Expert. A Legal Scholar who treated me with respect and focused on the Merits of the Case and nothing petty what so ever. I chose a man who is Respectful of my Rights and Talks kind to me, treats me with dignity even if he disagrees he is respectful about it and presents a very Intelligent, Sensible reason why he may disagree.

I had already spoke to this man, and read his incredible resume (Click Here to Read).

And yes I took a call to see what Marc Randazza Had to say, to offer, and out of respect for my Investigative Blogger whom contacted him. And I took the call to explore my options, thing is we did not speak again and next thing I knew, he was telling others he represented me and I had already agreed to work with the Attorney I chose. I had to contact Marc Randazza to tell him he did not represent me and why, I will be posting that email in Full coming soon. No one sentence pulled out as Kash-Shmear Hill likes to do, instead of investigate the entire TRUTH and Real FACTS.

Keep in mind this Plaintiff that Marc Randazza decided to align with was the same Plaintiff he was negotiating with in December of 2011, on my behalf and WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. Conflicts of Interest, Talking Behind the Potential Clients Back, Giving Away my Strategy, and completely disrespecting me and violating my right.

So Marc Randazza offered to buy the Domain Name, then Marc Randazza emailed and said you made your point what do you want and now he is Roaring that I extorted HIM, that is simply not true and is a Smoke Screen to cover up what he actually did to me.

Now Cut to David Aman, the Original Accuser of Extortion, and the One whom gave Forbes the infamous, false light defamatory email AFTER he had already won his case against me. See the Media Frenzy saying I am Guilty Until Never Given the Chance to be Proven Innocent, well they all got their Story from David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff. Yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney in his Frenzy to set me up for Extortion is still making me offers to Settle.

Yesterday, April 2nd 2012 David Aman, made and Offer to My Attorney to Settle. Why do this ? See David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney really wants to set me up for Extortion, he recently Deposed me and it was all about setting me up and previous income instead a real asset probe which would be about future income.

Last Week David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney threatened to file another Motion to Compel with Judge Hernandez to threaten and Harass me some more, this week an offer to Settle. It is all so convoluted.

Posted Here by
Crazy Crystal Cox
aKa - the Unhinged Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal Cox Marc Randazza WAR

More Regarding the Crystal Cox WAR against Lying Hypocritical Asshole Marc Randazza

Marc Randazza Violated my Rights, Exposed my Strategy, Negotiate for me with the Plaintiff without my permission, I am the Client, My rights were denied.
http://markrandazza.blogspot.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-violates-constitutional.html

Marc Randazza says Sandra Fluke is Butthurt, Marc Randazza is the One Butthurt
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-is-butthurt-hypocrite_30.html

Marc Randazza Defends Rush Limbaugh, Yet Attacks me for Calling His Wife a Slut and Buying Domain Names.
http://www.marcrandazza.com/search/label/Rush%20Limbaugh

Marc Randazza on the Wrong Side of Free Speech
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-on-wrong-side-of-free_30.html

Why in the World Defend the Owning of GlenBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlin1990.com and yet attack me for buying a name in a Dotcom? Oh I know, double standards.
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/i-dont-care-who-man-is-what-he-believes_30.html

This is what I sent Marc Randazza via Email, in my Pro Se Capacity after being Notified by Opposing Counsel that Marc Randazza had a Deposition in Portland. Marc Randazza Rejected this Document.
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html

No Way is Marc Randazza a Friend to Domainers
http://markrandazza.blogspot.com/2012/03/domainer-crystal-cox-also-investigative.html

Post Here by
Altruistic Investigative Blogger
Reverend Crystal Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Emails ( More Marc Randazza Emails will Be Posted Soon. The Marc Randazza emails before these Marc Randazza Emails.

The Great Debate of "Whom Extorted Whom" Continues.

I really think I do present the better legal case, don't you?

Oh Well It's all Just a Satire and Parody Anyway Right?
(for those who don't know, I make this joke because that was Randazza's
Defense in the WIPO Case with Glen Beck )

Marc Randazza spoke with me an Anti-Corruption Blogger who blogs on my blogs. This was on December 10th, 2011. Keep in mind time was critical at this point in getting a notice of appeal in or a Motion for a New Trial.

After the Phone Call I sent Marc Randazza lot's of documents, and last I heard he would read them to see if my argument was preserved enough to want to represent me and to see if he had a conflict of interest with the Media Bloggers Association.

Meanwhile, with Time Running out, I was weighing out all options. Another Attorney had contacted me on Dec. 6th, 2011 and said he wanted to represent me, but was waiting for clearance from his firm as this was completely Pro Bono and there was a process to go through. So I was not sure if he would represent me for sure or not. So I was still looking at other Attorney Options, and trying to see if it was even best to appeal, for I was going to do it Pro Se if no Attorney was on board. And wanted as many Expert as Opinions as I could, for this case matter to so many Whistle Blowers, Anti-Corruption Bloggers and Citizen Journalists.

So after the December 10th, 2011 Phone Call and Tons of Documents send, there was not another word from or regarding Marc Randazza until the 14th of December at exactly 5:06 PM when Marc Randazza Emailed me this, "

TO: Crystal L. Cox
December 14, 2011 5:06 PM

FROM: "mjr@randazza.com"

Crystal,

I have reviewed the file, and I have pondered the issues, and I have decided that I will take your case. We need to talk about some of the issues of representation before finalizing it. But, I am game.

When can you talk? "

How Ironic was that, as the Other Attorney had Emailed me at Exactly 5:00 PM regarding, hearing that Marc Randazza represented me, and wanted to know if he should call off the Pro Bono Process.

It seems that he had been told by others in the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented me, and so he called Marc Randazza up and flat out asked him. And it seems that Marc Randazza indeed claimed to be representing me, and even seemed to have spoke of a negotiation he was under way with as my "Attorney".

So of course acting as my Attorney he would violate my rights and negotiate without talking to me right? So just what was the terms of this negotiation on my alleged, behalf ? And if he did represent me in his own mind then how is it ethical to go to the other side with my strategy at that time. And how is it ethical to later, in a revenge over a domain name I refused to turn over to his demands, he went to the Plaintiff in this amazingly important First Amendment Case, and Side with them to Set me up for Extortion ? Did this secret negotiation giving away inside information and strategy acting as my attorney have anything to do with the Motion for a New Trial Process? What did Marc Randazza discuss with the Plaintiff's Camp? Is all this Legal? If so it is Certainly NOT ETHICAL.

Obviously the Reviewing and Pondering was well past, and Marc Randazza was acting as my Attorney. He emailed me he would take the case and told another Attorney he represented me, or so it would seem. Even though he made it clear to the other attorney that he had already been spending time and effort on this case.

So another words, Marc Randazza was acting as my attorney well before the 5:06 Email of Dec. 14th 2011, in which Marc Randazza finally let me, the client, know that he would take my case, though he had already told many he represented me, and had been already negotiating as my attorney.

It was recommended that I contact Marc Randazza and Let Marc Randazza know that he does not represent me. So My Response to Marc Randazza in the Above Email was The Following, and it was sent to Both Attorneys

"From: Crystal L. Cox
To: VOLOKH@law.ucla.edu; "mjr@randazza.com"
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 9:21 AM
Subject: from Pre Se Defendant Crystal L. Cox

I hope this email finds you doing well. I just want to clarify a few things as respectfully as I can.

Marc, it was nice talking with you, I do feel your working in the best interest of bloggers. After our conversation I sent documents, not even all, as you needed them another way, I never heard different and I prayed about our connection and its of the "greater good" and well Marc, when on the phone with me you told me I messed this up, thing is I am divinely led, and I did a great job, and in losing I got voice to the victims I fight for. I DID NOT MESS UP.

I filed tons of document, not the way you would of but they are in the public record, and also this trial, to me as it stands will be used to assist me in filing a Federal RICO Lawsuit and a Whistleblower Lawsuit, as I got them to perjury themself. And my goal is justice for all, and though an attorney may have got me out of this early, thing is there would have been someone else to sue me, or another to get sued to bring about the change in bloggers rights that this will bring. I did NOT mess up, and its important to me to be respected as the strong, intelligent, woman that I am, as my intention is really of the light, is good and ya sometimes I seem over the top but I am all heart on this, and my victims I will fight to the death for.

That's just who and what I am. You, Marc do not seem to respect me, or treat me as if I am worthy, equal to you, and it feels like you want your client, or possibly women in general to take a back seat to you and that's not me. And to confirm all this for me as I prayed for a sign, I heard thru several channels that you were saying you represented me, but did not give me the decency or respect to tell me or even keep me in the loop.

To not even email me back that you read any of the documents, to not contact me and then I hear your representing me. You said you may have a conflict and would let me know, you did not let me know and then seemed to tell others your were representing me, and you wanted money I don't have.

To me, after working 7 years at this, facing judges set me up, cops set me up, attorneys screw me over, death threats, being drugged, and extreme duress and persecution over all this for so long, well, you telling others you represent me BEFORE telling me, well that is on the wrong side of the moral and ethical compass to me. And is opposite of the equal rights, women's rights, lesbian rights, bloggers rights, citizen journalists rights, victims rights that I fight for.

Marc I got your forward last night, thing is I know the exact dollar amount of the transcripts, have known for over a week, and i know the court clerk email, been in this a year now. So that proves again you think me clueless, i have no money to get the transcripts at this time.

Eug ene spoke highly of you and even recommended you, thing is I will not speak with anyone on this from the law aspect expect Eu gene, if he can't represent me, I will not appeal.

As Eug ene represents what I fight for, and no disrespect marc just a tip for your future, Eug ene emailed me here and there and let me know what was going on, he listened to me, respected me and never once told me I messed up or EVER assumed anything about me. Nor did he speak of my journalistic standards as an issue, as you did. He never hesitated in wanted to represent me, it was simply a matter of if he could. He is Kind to me, smart and treats me with dignity and respect, you do not. Sorry that Simple.

So Just wanted you to know a bit why, and confirm, Marc Randazza does NOT represent me in ANY way. Eug ene Vo lok h represents me, and if he can't then so be it, I will leave that in the hands of the Great Spirit. I will not lose my voice, my dignity, and respect in this. I know my Truth though many others are trashing me, I know my truth.

The New York Times and Forbes are legally defaming me and inspiring a lynch mob based on one email that they refuse to discuss my side or even investigate the truth. I want to file lawsuits against them, and I intend to fight back.

I do not want to sit down and shut up, I do not want a back seat in this, though I dont want to interfere or tell an attorney whats best, thing is I know the clerks, the case, the documents and I just want respect for what I have done and not told I messed up.

I have lost my home phone, and internet, I am to be evicted on Monday, I keep fighting and blogging and I will no matter what. This last year I lost everything that was dear to me, and my life as I knew it, corruption has done everything to shut me down. So no disrespect Marc, I just don't like the way you treated me.

take care and keep up the great work for the better good of all victims of a corrupt justices system that makes victims out to be criminals. The Lie will NOT stand as the TRUTH on my watch. I am certain of my Fight, my Mission per say.

Blessings to You

In Love and Light,

Crystal L. Cox
Broker Owner

Search Engine Reputation Manager

Investigative Blogger

Good Life International Distributor

Peace and Love to You !!! "

Marc Randazza Responded 7 Minutes Later, Saying This,
and he copied the other Attorney,

"Friday, December 16, 2011 9:28 AM
FROM: "mjr@randazza.com"
To: Crystal L. Cox

"Ok, thank you for your email. I wish you the absolute best of luck in this matter. "

More From Marc Randazza

"Friday, December 16, 2011 12:55 PM

Crystal,

I want to address a few things:

First and foremost, if you feel that I did not treat you respectfully, I humbly apologize. I do not wish to leave that un-discussed. People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed.

I also want to correct a misperception here. I did not tell anyone that I represented you, for certain. I did tell the opposing counsel that I thought a deal might be brokered - but that I wanted to speak to him first (to test his waters with respect to a possible mutually agreeable resolution).

Finally, I want to make it clear that our discussion about money was in terms of "costs." I thought that I made it clear that my bills, my fees (my income) would be waived. All that I was asking you about being able to pay was out of pocket reimbursement of expenses.

Despite the contents of this email, I wish to let you know that I am sill willing to lend a hand in any way - even in the background.

-Marc "

Response From Crystal Cox Blogger

"

Friday, December 16, 2011 2:03 PM

Thank You Marc I appreciate it, thing is again talking to the Devil to cut a deal without my permission is again disrespective. I consciously, intelligently chose not to deal, they sent a, what they call settlement communication a couple weeks before the trial, asking me to blame somebody they dont like, wanting 20 of my sites, and wanted me to pay 5000 for ever time i discuss them, even after i was granted a summary judgment to talk about them, and this is apparently not extortion... so i chose no deal... they did not prove that post not true, they tricked me, they lied, and i will not deal with them unless its a very good deal, they have put me through hell and now are persecuting me and setting me up for a crime..

one of my clients called this morning and said they got a call with somebody asking, so this means they have my bank account and are investigating me, yet for some reason not investigating the criminals.. so a deal would have to be very good.. and I would want in on it..

anyway thanks again for the apology.. peace and love to you"

Fast Forward to Monday January 16th, 2012, 2:30 PM. I thought I had left things on decent terms. A month had passed and having been evicted and a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgment, I was looking for work, so I email this to Marc Randazza.

"Hi Marc, hope this email finds you doing well. When I thought we may work together
i bought http://www.marcrandazza.com/ - to control the search, and pr on my case,
if you represented me.. I manage it now, as ownership is well.. a different story now
due to my current judgement..

I am confident with the case, and leaving it to the highest and best good..

I do however need to make money, so I am asking you if you or anyone you know could
use a very good search engine reputation manager. Not sure if you ever researched that
for your online presence.. not sure of what you think of David Aman excusing me of extortion,
thing is search management is something tons of people due and for thousands a month per search term..

and so when he sent a cease and desist and filed a lawsuit, i offered it as a way to settle and not
spend a year fighting, he turned it down, then a year later accused me of a crime.. its simply not
how it happened..

Anyway if you know anyone needing a very good search engine reputation manager please let me know.."

That is the email that he claims I extorted him. A domain name I bought Dec. 6th 2011, that I had every legal right to own. A legitimate service that thousands offer. And I had not written about Marc Randazza in any way what so ever at that time.

And though many love to speculate, what I meant by ownership is a different story, is that the Plaintiff was in the process of paperwork to take Domain Names that I owned or had owned, and that was one of them, so ya ownership is a different story as I thought the Plaintiff would take the Domain Name, and they still seem to be in the process of trying to do so. As they Deem the Domain Names and Asset, though at this point in time they certainly seem to be a Liability to an owner.

I never extorted anyone nor was there a Criminal Complaint Filed regarding extortion. What Follows is Extortion and threats from Marc Randazza if I don't turn over the name, and well he followed through with his threat, and now has other Lawyers, Bloggers, the New York Times, Forbes and more posting information that deliberately puts me in False Light and flat out lies. Marc Randazza is flat out lying about me and committing a Hate Crime in inciting a riot against me based on fraudulent information and Flat Out Lies.

Marc Randazza's Response to the Above Email

"TO: Crystal L. Cox
January 16, 2012 2:36 PM

Crystal,

You have no right to register a domain name that corresponds to my real name. Please hand that domain name over to me, and please do not presume to think it is okay to register other people's names as domain names.

________________________________________

Marc John Randazza*
Randazza Legal Group"

WOW, 6 minutes Later Marc John Randazza Responds.

So was that as an attorney, saying I have no legal right to register a domain name that corresponds to his real name or was that just his opinion? Wait now, before you answer, remember the Glen Beck Email and the WIPO case that Marc Randazza won over that, and remember the Crystal Cox, Proskauer Rose Lawyers and how I won the right to have those Domain Names, and I was Pro Se in that Case.

So then he goes to Please hand that domain name over to me, and please do not presume to think it is okay to register other people's names as domain names. REALLY, wow.. is that all you got... after defending others to own VERY sick names accusing someone of rape and murder right in the domain name. Ahhh Marc, ya big baby, it was just a Parody, a Satire...

Ok SO My Response Was

"Monday, January 16, 2012 3:23 PM

"Really? Well Marc, Look at my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose, WIPO sure seems to think its Ok. I thought it was perfectly legal to do so. I have registered others name in fair competition and real estate for years. I registered others names to promote them, some to expose them, and others as investments in the future. Many smart internet marketers register others names, it is not illegal Marc. Sorry I upset you, never mind. I was simply looking for people to promote as I need a job. Guess you don't need such a service, all you had to do was say no thank you. I am sure that you get tons of spam emails daily asking you to hire them, we all do. You could have just ignored it."

Marc Randazza sure did get into a huff over it.. Talk about Double Standards. He knows as an Attorney in this field of expertise that he was lying about my right to own that Domain Name.

I went on to say ...

"It is certainly not against the law to register the domain name of others. I was Pro Se with my Proskauer Rose case and I won, having many of their attorney names as a dotcom. Real free to file with WIPO, and be sure and name me in that case as well as the current registered name, as I proudly and smartly registered the domain name. We are happy to go to WIPO over it.

there are others but here is the chairman of Proskauer Rose, WIPO Case

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0679 "

Next Marc Randazza Says,

"From: Marc J. Randazza
To: Crystal L. Cox
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: from Crystal L. Cox

I'm not interested in WIPO. You want to make an enemy of me, really?

Marc John Randazza"

Crystal Cox's Response

"
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Crystal L. Cox
To: Marc J. Randazza
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: from Crystal L. Cox

How in the world did I make an enemy, I got it to protect the story, and the search term
as I thought you were going to represent me, and wanted to control the negativity I knew
I would get about it. That's what I do, I never did anything negative against you. And you
do care of WIPO, i read one of your bio things braggin about a WIPO case you won for someone.

No offense.. if asking you for a job, or to recommend a job made you an enemy, nothing I can do about that, certainly was NOT my intention in any way."

Marc Randazza Says,

"From: "mjr@randazza.com"
To: Crystal L. Cox
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:52 AM
Subject: RE: from Crystal L. Cox

Crystal,

Perhaps you just don't understand how deeply offensive it is to me that you would register that without even telling me, let alone asking me. You had no right to do that.

Do you think that just by being my potential client, or even my actual client that it somehow created a right for you to register my name to "protect the story?" Don't you think that I have a) the ability to do that myself, and b) the right to decide whether or not you would use my name for your own exclusive use -- to talk about YOUR story? Even if you thought that this was okay, which seems strange to me, why on earth would you think that you continue to have any justification for having that domain?

Asking me for a job, or a recommendation? That doesn't bother me in the least. In fact, if you had displayed any ethics, I'd be game to do so.

But, why on earth would you think that it is reasonable to tell someone that a) you registered THEIR name for YOUR own purposes, and THEN b) ask for a job? It is (a) that makes an enemy of me. (b) is completely reasonable.

I'm sure you paid a few bucks for the domain. I'd be pleased to reimburse you what it cost you. But, I do not find it to be acceptable that someone else has registered my name for any purpose. I certainly do not agree with your justification for doing it in the first place. Nevertheless, any justification you MIGHT have had dissolved when it became certain that I was not going to represent you, I have no connection to this case at all, and thus I can't possibly see any reason for you to have any control over that domain whatsoever -- unless the purpose is to simply make an enemy of me. "

Ok so Marc Randazza has no problem of me asking for a job, yet now in the Media is calling it Extortion, as part of the PopeHat.com Attorney Lynch Mob. Then Marc goes on to say well if you did have "any justification" then it dissolved " when it became certain that I was not going to represent you". Did you mean when I made it clear to YOU that you WOULD not Represent Me, because you Treated Me Badly and Disrespected Me? Oh I see, well if that's your legal case in this dispute, I bought the Name on December 6th, 2011 and I certainly was not "certain" at that time. So where is the Extortion you Lying Asshole?

Crystal Cox Responded to the Above Email with This

"Thanks for your input, confirms my choice regarding you. Fine if you want me as an enemy, so be it.

As far as my ethics, you have no clue who I am, I know my Truth. And I Trust you know yours.

There is nothing wrong with registering names, to further my cause, or protect my story in search. Or registering domain names to write news, events, and whistle blower tips on that person. It is a way to get stories in the top of the search, it is wise to have one's own name, you call me an enemy here so it is.

I will take no future job from you, I want no money from you. i will use the name to post current and archived internet stories about you, as I please, not defamation, simply word for word as I find them on
the sites of others. I have the right to repost articles of others and have received emails from many asking why I did not choose you to represent me, I had not responded. If you want your domain name, you will have to file a WIPO complaint, and or sue me for registering it and sue the guy I sold it to.

And maybe take a look at his story to and the surrounding corruption that is ignored. This is bigger then free speech Marc, it is about the culture of corruption in america and the lawyers, judges, cops, corporations that are either part of the solution or part of the problem.

You did not treat me well, for you believed what others said and did not even know that the story i was writing on was and is very true, that guy really did those things and I was just getting the story to the top of the search engines.

You asked for all my documents, said you would get back to me, and then told others you represented me. To me you are a bully, not ethical, as you said in your call you were not sure of me because of what was being said, thing is I am good at search management for good guys because of years of exposing, investigating, deep search on the "bad guys".

I turn up amazing discovering, and find out who is connected from monitoring my posts and the search engine placement has ex employees, ex wives and husbands, and tons of people sending me tips on that person, because i am so good at getting on top of search.

I gave voice to victims and the search placement happened by accident. After 5 years of it, i decided to offer it as a service, i have not got any jobs from it thus far, have not really tried heavily as I was employed as an investigative blogger by a big company out of new york to investigate connections
of people, which i am very good at deep online research and turning up tips.

And yes I have a "right" to register what I want, if you want that to NOT be a right you should have first bought the name years ago and secondly lobby the laws, so that the register cannot sell people's names to those who are not named that person. The registrar lets people register what they want, and perhaps those laws should change. However for me it is a tool to get in search and to uncover stories, post stories and make connections between things that person is or has ever been involved in.

As far as the domain name, It is not for sale at any price, for any reason. I currently don't own it and simply manage the name. You say in your email that your capable to registering the name?? why didn't you then? Be offended if you like, you offended me at our first call. Your an arrogant pompous
ass, and so thanks for letting me know that you are an enemy. So be it. I have faith that is meant to be, so let the WAR begin.. your Move..

I have every justification for owning that name, for one obviously i am smarter then you.

Slam me, say no ethics, and the rest of what you have said about me, well your FLAT WRONG about me, so be it, nothing I can do. You want an enemy of me, then fine, you have made that call. Let the skeletons in your closet start to rattle, hope your squeaky clean.

I have registered every name of the companies i have worked for in order to protect them in search, its just common sense Marc Randazza.

And you have NO connection to me in this case? Really, well rumor has it that you told people you represented me, and then later said other things about me, so I am not sure that is the whole truth and nothing but, at any rate I will not email you again... you have drawn your line in the sand.. do as you will I trust its meant to be.. "

Flash Forward to March 7th 2012, this was the Day that Tonkon Torp Attorney David Aman, for the Plaintiff in attempting to execute on a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement Signed a Subpoena to Marc Randazza. On March 8th as my own Attorney, in my Pro Se Capacity I get an Email with a Copy of the Marc Randazza Deposition Subpoena.

After this, the Use of MarcRandazza.com took a Turn.

Ok so on March 10th I am pissed off and want to Expose Marc Randazza before his deposition, so I buy FuckMarcRandazza.com - MarcRandazzaSucks.com ... and I publicize these names best I can, he knows they went up, I saw him on my Statcounter. Ok so then on March 12th I buy more names to keep building blogs on, such as MarcJRandazza.com and Marc John Randazza .com ..

So I Got notably into the Search Engines and

Marc Randazza Emails, Crystal Cox This

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "mjr@randazza.com"
To: Crystal Cox
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 12:37 PM
Subject: Ok

Ok, you made your point. So what do you want? "

I Did NOT Respond.

Ok at this point I am really PISSED, as Marc Randazza was planning on giving a Deposition and I assumed emailed me this to set me up for Extortion, so On the 13th of March I researched Deeper into the Marc Randazza - Sandra Fluke - Rush Limbaugh Scandal.

I pushed these as blogs and Marc Randazza certainly knew.. then on the 13th, after I was researching the Sandra Fluke Slut Comments and Marc Randazza in the Search Engines I found this post

Where Do Babies Come From ? Why a Drunken Tryst in Cabo San Lucas Of Course.
http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/
If it Gone Let Me Know, I have a PDF I can email you.

Anyway so then I thought to myself, what a Hypocrite, defending Rush Limbaugh and talking like this about his own knocked up wife. And there was her name so I took a look and there it was Domain Name Available, so I bought it and I bought the other one he is so upset about which I have never mentioned or publicized in ANY way, nor will I. It was bought to prove that Marc Randazza is not who he claims to be, OH in my OPINION.

As most of you know by now, I have bought the dot com of countless names of individuals over the years for various reasons. So why subpoena ONLY ONE of them in an asset probe? See what really happened is Marc Randazza was pissed, he wanted an easy way to steal the domain name instead of going through legal channels and filing a WIPO Complaint to go through a process of, if he really had a right to the Domain Name or Not.

So Marc Randazza seemed to have cut a deal with the Plaintiff, the very one he was going to represent me against. And so Marc Randazza was flying to Portland to give a Deposition regarding my assets. I was still pro see in the execution of a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement and all of the sudden the center of the entire case was now surrounding one $10 Domain Name that I purchased AFTER the $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement was Entered.

So I emailed this to Marc Randazza, as I am Pro Se, he emailed right back and said I do not open attachments from this email. So I sent it again in the body of the email. As my own attorney I have a right to ask these question..
http://www.marcrandazza.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html
I will be adding to, as the extortion set up and events surrounding it and PopeHat.com, Kenneth P. White, Kasmir Hill Conflicts of Interest, all this and more I WILL ASK in Marc Randazza's Deposition. As of this time, it seems he has not followed through with the Deposition. I will let you know if he does. If Not, then I will ask those questions, after I file my Lawsuit against them. This will be awhile as I am working on Criminal Complaints against Judge Marco Hernandez and Tonkon Torp, as well as Complaints to the Attorney General, and the Oregon Judicial Qualification Committee. As well as a Federal Hate Crime Filing.

Marc Randazza Deposition Subpoena
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/118010119/Randazza-Subpoena
If you can't read it and want to, Email me for a PDF -
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher - Media Bloggers Association Marc Randazza starts a WAR with Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and STOMPS on Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All.

Got a Marc Randazza Whistle Blower Tip?
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Drama Queen Marc Randazza Talks of his darkest hour of Terror... OMG if that is his darkest hour then his life is so very charmed..

2012-04-06T23:57:00.001-07:00

Marc Randazza.. .. so what was your Darkest Hour of "Terror" ?

OMG my Darkest Hour of Terror was when a woman on the lunatic fringe registered a domain name, I was to damn dumb to buy.. See I saw Crystal Cox attacking my post regarding a drunken tryst. .. and OMG after I emailed her to say.. "you made your point what do you want"... ( ya know to set up for extortion and get that bitch behind bars...) well.. OMG she got so mad she bought the domain name resembling my wife's name.. I was so upset, I had sleepless nights... then I was like OMG ... maybe she bought a mysterious secret domain name that she has not put online yet.. I better get up and check.. OMFG.. she did.. I am going to call Kash at Forbes Right away and rally my buddies, and ..oh I know, as a special favor to Super Duper Marc Randazza I will get ol' Kash to exploit the mystery name.. and help me seek my revenge on that Bad Shit Crazy Blogger Crystal Cox for buying Marc Randazza .com - that otta fix her lil' wagon..

I don't know why she is so upset with me.. I was just trying to get her some prison time.. and fuck up her case.. and well ya know set her up.. gee she needs to calm down..

YOU WILL NOT DESTROY ME MARC RANDAZZA..
I am in the White Light on this..

oh and DO Contact the FBI as your Interviewer Suggested, I have some things to tell them.. about you Dumb ASS.. I am on the Right Side of the Law, and the Right Side of the Moral Compass.. I know Who I am.. Marc Randazza, The Victims of Corruption I Defend will not be silence over YOUR FLAT OUT LIES !!

I Could Never Follow. ..Taking the Long Way Around.. Wouldn't Kiss All the Asses ..

2012-04-05T10:52:00.002-07:00

Crystal Cox Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Crystal Cox Extortion Charges: Communications Between Crystal Cox Pro Se Defendant in Her Pro Se Capacity and Opposing Counsel David Aman, Tonkon Torp. Crystal Cox DID not Extort Kevin Padrick, David Aman Nor Marc Randazza.

2012-04-05T01:07:00.000-07:00

You Will Note at the Bottom of David Aman's Email asking me what I am proposing there is a Disclosure, the Disclosure Notice on Those Emails is Posted below in QUOTES.

I am posting these emails in order to provide Transparency, I would not have posted these had David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney not Leaked my Email to Him to "Big Media" in seeming attempt to incite hate, discredit me, defame me with malice, and attack me, even though he had already WON.

David Aman is the Attorney for the Plaintiff in Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Crystal Cox.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer was also involved in the alleged corruption that Crystal Cox Blogger was exposing in the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy. Click Here for That Document.
And David Aman had been emailed by Attorneys, Insiders as to issues of deferred gain, taxes and other issues regarding the Summit Bankruptcy and knew for years that Crystal Cox Blogger was NOT the One Who exposed this information to the Public at Large.

David Aman also Deposed Whistleblower Stephanie Deyoung in August of 2009 in Video and asked her about Blogger Crystal Cox, yet Never asked me to remove a post nor called me and asked me my "motive". Click Here to Watch the Video of David Aman, Tonkon Torp (the Same Attorney that Sued Me and Continues to Harass me) he took a Video Deposition of Stephanie DeYoung in August of 2009 to ask about Blogger Crystal Cox. AND never contacted me, Crystal Cox, the "Blogger".

Here is the Disclaimer in this Email Thread Regarding the Communication, Privileged Communication Between Crystal Cox Defendant in Her Pro Se Capacity and Opposing Counsel David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm.

"The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. ...... If you think you have received this e-mail message in error, please e-mail the sender at davida@tonkon.com"

This misled me, deceived me, in my Pro Se Capacity, that along with the fact that the lawsuit had already been filed, a cease and desist already sent and I was responding to David Aman, Attorney for the Plaintif CONTACTING ME.

I did not email David Aman out of the Blue, and I did NOT Extort the Plaintiff in any way. I certainly assumed these emails were privileged, private correspondence between Crystal Cox, Defendant (Me) in My Pro Se Capacity and Opposing Counsel David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer for Plaintiff Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group.

That Email was in Response to the "Letter from David Aman" as you see in the Thread Below and at this link (Click Here) you See David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney's Filing called Aman "Reply Memorandum In Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgement", On the Bottom of Page 3 David Aman Says, "In fact, Ms. Cox’s real purpose for falsely attacking plaintiffs, is clear. In
response to plaintiffs’ December 22, 2010 "cease and desist" letter, she wrote the following by email on January 19, 2011:" It was in Response to their Threats in order to STOP a Year Long Lawsuit and in Effort to Negotiate a Cease Fire, I wanted them to Cease Fire and made an Offer, later I learned it was called a "Settlement Communication". I did not know that at First as I had never been sued, and certainly had never been my Own Pro Se Attorney.

And now Kashmir Hill of Forbes, David Carr of the New York Times, Marc Randazza, Kenneth P. White of Popehat.com, Tracy Coenen, Randazza Legal Group, have launched a campaign to set up a Blogger for Extortion when I was not accused of Extortion in an Criminal Complaint, nor was I on trial for extortion and now this Lynch Mob has put me under Extreme Duress and ALL will be named in my Federal Hate Crime Filing, Criminal Complaint, Judicial Complaint, FBI Complaint, Attorney General Complaint, Bar Complaint and Department of Justice Complaint.

I assumed our Communication was under these "Rules", and in December of 2011, David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm emailed this Private, Privileged, Communication between "Counsel" to Forbes and to Seattle Weekly and possibly the New York Times and other Outlets.

This was after Opposing Counsel, David Aman, Tonkon Torp had already won his case against Crystal Cox, Defendant (Me) in My Pro Se Capacity. The motive is unclear, as the Plaintiff already got what "they" wanted, a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement. SO why leak one email in a thread of several emails between Crystal Cox, Defendant (Me) in My Pro Se Capacity and Opposing Counsel David Aman ?

The motive is certainly with actual malice, certainly is defaming, paints me in False Light, is misleading to the masses in major media publications, violates my rights to privacy, accuses me of a crime, endangers my life, incites a riot against me and puts me under huge duress for no reason as THEY had already WON their Case, and I was not on Trial for that ONE EMAIL in any way. Nor had I been charged with a Crime.

These Emails were a Communication Between 2 Attorneys in this case as it was between me, Crystal Cox in my Pro Se Capacity and David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff ( Opposing Counsel ) and it Seems to Proclaim it is Confidential and Should not get into the Wrong hands, thing is this Same Attorney leaked part of these emails to set me up for extortion.

I want to Sue Tonkon Torp and plan to file a Lawsuit in the coming weeks, if you are a White Collar Criminal Attorney, or an Attorney that can represent me in this matter please email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com. I have been harassed, set up, lied to, lied about, discriminated against, my life put in danger and more by David Aman of the Tonkon Torp Law Firm.

I now face daily threats, constant online attacks, and even have a Federal Judge Accusing me of a Crime that I did not Commit, and without a Public Defender which I asked for and without due process to present my side of said email and allegations. All because of One Email David Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer used to attempt to set up a Blogger that was Exposing alleged corruption he and his law firm Tonkon Torp LLP was involved in. I plan to sue David Aman Personally and Professional. I also Plan to include this Malicious Attack in my Federal Hate Crime Filing, Criminal Complaint, Judicial Complaint, FBI Complaint, Attorney General Complaint, Bar Complaint and Department of Justice Complaint as Soon as I have the time to file it.

And I plan sue Tonkon Torp Law Firm and their Insurance Provider. As well as Forbes for leaking this email without verifying it with me, accusing me of Criminal Activity when I was not charged with a Crime and not Verify the FACTS in attempt to harass me, defame me with actual malice, flat out lie about me to discredit bloggers in general and incite a riot, ruin my business and deliberately tear me down. If you are an attorney that would like to represent me in this matter, email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com .

Here is the Full Email Thread, Note the First Email is at the Bottom and the Attached Document it talks about is a Letter from David Aman Threatening a Lawsuit.

Below is Several Emails Between Crystal Cox in her Pro Se Capacity and David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick and David Brown.

The Emails make the point that I clarified that I was not offering to remove anything for money.

The Emails also show that David Aman, Attorney for the Plaintiff had contacted me first, threatened a lawsuit and my response was to offer a service to negotiate a STOP to this legal action.

And the Emails show that David Aman Baited me, as he asked me what my services and rates would include, what they were, I made if clear that it was not to remove anything, and then he cried I extorted him and his client, Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

These emails are between the Plaintiff's Attorney, and someone acting Pro Se, as their own attorney in MY Pro Se Capacity, AFTER a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit had been filed against me.

One of the services I offered online was Internet Marketing, so I offered this as a negotiation. The Plaintiff's Attorney, David Aman Tonkon Torp, Offered me a Settlement in which I would pay them, they offered that twice, they called it a "Settlement Communication".

Here is an Offer from The Plaintiff from April of 2011, that I Rejected.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117951212/Rejection-of-April-Offer

Here is Their Settlement Offer from November 2nd 2011, just before the Trial,
Which I Rejected.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117951595/Cox-Settlement-Offer-Rejection

After they won Obsidian V. Cox, the Plaintiff Flew to L.A. to make me another Settlement Offer, by meeting in person with my Attorney that filed the Motion for the New Trial, BEFORE the Motion for a New Trial was Filed. I REJECTED this Offer As Well, for it was not good for other Anti-Corruption Bloggers, Citizen Journalists, and Whistle Blowers.

Just Days Ago on April 2nd 2012, the Plaintiff's Attorney made another Settlement Offer, I Rejected it again for the same reasons. I feel very passionate about this and I want to do right by other Anti-Corruption Bloggers, Citizen Journalists, Whistle Blowers and victims of the Culture of Corruption in America.

Below is Several Emails, a Discussion Between Me, as my Own Attorney (Pro Se) and Opposing Counsel, the Attorney for the Plaintiff.

Click On Title to See in DocStoc, or Scroll Down on the Scroll Bar to the Right,

If you cannot see this Document, Email me for a PDF, Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Privileged Communication Between Crystal Cox Defendant in Her Pro Se Capacity and Opposing Counsel David Aman, Tonkon Torp. Email Thread Between Opposing Counsel and Crystal Cox in her Pro Se Capacity

Posted Here by
Altruistic Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

There was no "Crystal Cox Extortion" as so many of you are searching online. I am not the "Bad Guy".

Letter to the Editor of New York Times from Chris Andreae of KBOO Community Radio Portland Oregon, Air Cascadia Regarding What She Calls David Carr's New York Times Hissy Fit.

2012-04-03T12:07:00.000-07:00

" To the Editor of Business Day Media And Advertising and the Times' readership:

It is unlikely that readers will be aware of the writer, David Carr's long-standing animosity towards Crystal Cox . He has attacked her in print on a number of occasions that I know of.

The nut of this whole saga is simple: people who wield a great deal of power, influence and money in the arenas of finance, law and journalism are going after an intrepid investigative reporter and blogger who writes at white-hot speed.

The question Carr really should be asking is this: Why do the Mighty feel so threatened by what Cox has uncovered?

Crystal Cox did not create the information on the objection to Tonkon Torp’s fees that was part of the Summit Bankruptcy; the information came to her through her sources at Summit. She simply “followed the money” and I provided links to the documents, videos, information, depositions, court filings, insider emails, court audios and more that were already online.

In other words, What Crystal Cox does as a first-rate investigative journalist is track down the players and then provide readers with the tools to do the same. Clearly she enjoys what she does. And she wants to share that ‘Eureka!’ moment with others who share her curiosity. Her delight is evident in the “unconventional” writing style.

Crystal Cox writes exactly the way she speaks: uncensored, unhindered and undeterred by an Inner Editor. Perhaps her ‘voice’ seems rough because she is honest. You just don’t get that in journalism these days. The faster an object spins, the smoother the surface."

I have been interviewed a few times by KBOO Community Radio Portland, Chris Andreae Air Cascadia, here was my First Interview, it is an Audio at the bottom of the right up.

http://kboo.fm/node/32530

Check Out Chris Andreae of KBOO Community Radio Portland Oregon, Air Cascadia She is doing Important Work.
http://kboo.fm/AirCascadia

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees - Objection to Fees of Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson, David Peterson, David Aman and Obsidian Finance Group, and Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees

2012-03-29T17:54:00.000-07:00

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Obsdian Finance Group

Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees of Tonkon Torp Firm and Obsdian Finance Group. Summit Bankruptcy Objection To Fees David Peterson Tonkon Torp, David Aman Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson Tonkon Torp.

The System of "Trustee" and Guardianship is Heavily Corruptible and in the Case of Elders it Seems that it's down right EVIL. The Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik is an Example of the Rampant Corruption in the Elder Care, "Trustee" Racket. Check Out the Story of Richard Block, Sally Griffin of Devon Bank Chicago and the Estate of Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik.

2012-03-29T14:58:00.000-07:00

"There is NO legislation in the Trust and Savings Act. Trustees are on an "honor system" and can do whatever they want." It seems there is a trend of a Trustee Stepping in and taking over the finances of Elderly Men and Woman whom get forced into the system by corrupt social workers, judges, attorneys, and the Trustee that hands out their Victims Money. A Trustee's Abuse of Power is unchecked by any government agency or oversight, time for that to change. You are NOW accountable to Citizen Journalists, Corruption Bloggers, and Whistle Blowers.

The Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik story is a story of

such corruption within the Guardianship, Trustee System.

Take a Look

"87 year-old Polish-German Immigrant who came here on a student visa in the 1950’s.

He is a good American citizen – real estate agent, foreign language teacher and translator for our own court system. He also saved every penny he made except for his indulgence in books. Rare books – Polish, German, etc. He gathered thousands of them, traveled the world to collect them.

Then he met his attorney who set him up with a trust account. The bank trustee hired him a ‘care manager’ who hired him a doctor to call him incompetent then a guardianship hearing ensued. I don't need to tell you what happened to this poor soul other than to say the hired care manager became his guardian.

I was his caregiver, his best friend, his family and he was mine. I became collateral damage.
In short, as of June 2008 this man had a half a million dollars in cash. Along with his property, he was worth close to a million dollars. He had two wishes – to buy a new car and to die in the home he lived in for the past 46 years.

His bank trustee said no to the first wish for the simple fact that he can’t drive anymore. (In my opinion, when you have that kind of money, if a new car puts a spring in your step and makes you look forward to your Sunday drive, why not buy him one? Or just lease one for him and pretend it’s his?)

As of September 2009, they cleaned out his basement and his book collection was removed by a junkman. They also took his personal correspondence, his family photographs, etc. Devon Bank ransacked his home and stole his personal possessions.

He was hospitalized in November 2009 and told me that they’re “buying him a home” but he doesn’t want to move. He had over a half a million dollars two years ago. He also owns a four-unit apartment building with rental income that "should be" coming in from three of the units.

Will he get his dying wish to stay home?

He opened his trust account at Devon Bank. His attorney is Janna Dutton. This is my story as his caregiver. "

"I wrote the problem on a website for Seniors. The moderator responds with, ‘Call Adult Protective Services’ and I do.

Laurie Sherry comes out to talk to Ludwig and he doesn’t want to say anything in regard to the two lady friends ripping him off for fear of retribution and I’m love with the woman because all she says is, ‘Do you think what they’re doing to you is fair?’ Of course not and he says as much. She’s going to talk with them on his behalf.

I tell her that he needs to write a will, he needs to get his financial affairs together and I’m fed up with his money. It’s got to get away from us because he can’t manage it anymore and after seeing how nasty it makes people, I don’t want it anywhere near us. So, Laurie hands Ludwig a list of attorneys’ to call and tells him that he needs to write a will but he doesn't want to. He’s not ready to die yet.

She talks with his two lady friends and instead of stopping, they take him out for lunch at $80 a pop. And if you think they hated me before, these two ladies are furious with me. I’m not going to get into all their petty nonsense either. Like I said, I don’t take it personally. If Ludwig had another caregiver trying to protect him, these two ladies would attack that person too. It was the money they were after and whomever stood in their way to get their hands on it, got abused and slandered. It’s that simple.

So, I notify Laurie of the lunch dates, she puts an end to those then we lose touch for a few months and Ludwig is being taken advantage of by contractors. Now, Laurie is very insistent that he write a will and set up his financial affairs. I couldn’t agree more."

"In walk Sally and Rick from Devon Bank. Let me say now that everything they told me and Ludwig (before they had his money) was a lie - from start to finish.

The only thing they promised to do and kept was hire Josh Mitzen. I thought he was the owner of a caregiving agency (until Laurie Sherry from Elder Protective Services told me otherwise) because every time I mentioned to Sally that I needed a new one for his weekend care, she said that she was hiring Josh.

I found out later that he’s a court appointed guardian, who’s an attorney and worked for Elder Protective Services. You see where this is going, don’t you? Yes, they're hiring him for my position. Just setting Josh up in order to slander me, gain control of Ludwig's estate then divvy it up amongst their friends.

Sally told Ludwig that she wouldn’t do anything with his money without asking him. She said this so much that if the man were lying in a coma, he’d hear her. She won’t hire anyone without his approval, he can have anything he wants to buy, she won’t interfere - all he had to do was tell me to make the call and the money would be there. That was an ENORMOUS lie. Ludwig had a tenant in his building and her boyfriend moved in. He was on parole for attempted murder, was a skinhead, we were scared of him, the tenant had no lease and was behind in her rent. They said that they would evict them. They’d also leave Ludwig’s checking account alone at the bank by the house, etc., etc. Like I said, the lies were endless except for Josh Mitzen.

The second time they came over together, they stopped by with people who would manage Ludwig’s property and a contractor to remodel his empty apartment.

That was when Rick Block started bragging about Ludwig's money. He said, ‘I’ve got free reign over the old man’s half a million dollars!’ He was like a little kid in a candy store. After he said it, I said to myself, ‘I’ve got free reign over the Internet!’ He pulls any funny business and I’ve got no problem publishing it.

To be honest, I got scared of him because he has no business behaving that way. I mean, I spent years watching people get excited over Ludwig’s money and now I have a bank trustee doing it. So, I wouldn’t let them see my apartment because it wasn’t mine. It belonged to Ludwig's sister in Germany for her visits. They’d know it and kick me out faster.

Even though I couldn’t get my brain wrapped around the scam, every other part of my being was screaming that the whole thing stinks. I just couldn’t come to terms with the fact that I called Elder Protective Services (run by Catholic Charities) to protect a man from being financially exploited and they set him up to do exactly that by a bunch of professionals.

Rick and Sally were standing on the back porch saying that they owed the contractor a job and I was thinking that was payback time using my Seniors money. I asked Sally why she was hiring a realty company to manage the building and she said, ‘What am I going to if a pipe breaks at twelve o’clock at night?’ Well, a pipe didn’t break at midnight but something else happened. I assure you, Sally wasn’t disturbed by it nor was the realty company that she hired. You can’t get a hold of them.

This was when I started keeping notes of everything those two bank trustees did. My intuition told me that I wasn’t going to be around for very long because it was their intention to establish their reputation on the back of my Senior. My brain kept ignoring me though, not enough to stop me from writing it all down."

Read More on the Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik STORY Click Below
https://sites.google.com/site/josephludwigziarnik/home/home
NOTE: Site May Go Down, SO Print Out or Save a Copy.

Also Check Out this Blog Exposing Elder Abuse in the Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik STORY.

"Sally Griffin and Richard Block at Devon Bank in Chicago"

http://josephludwigziarnik.blogspot.com/

"This is a story of Elder Abuse. I had the unique experience of watching the trustees (Sally Griffin and Richard Block) at Devon Bank in Chicago steal this gentleman's (almost) million dollar estate by hiring people to abuse him with his own money. They then divvied up his estate amongst their friends and threw out his personal possessions." Click Below to Read the Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik STORY in the words of the Whistle Blower, the Care Giver of Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik, Exposing Corruption in Guardianship of Devon Bank and Elder Abuse in Chicago.

Read More at Link Below

http://josephludwigziarnik.blogspot.com/

More on the Devon Bank Guardianships Scam coming soon. Looks Like it's time to File a Federal RICO Lawsuit, Criminal Complaints, Department of Justice Complaints, FBI Complaints, Possible HIPAA Violations, and possible a Qui Tam Whistle Blower Lawsuit AGAINST Devon Bank Chicago

Read More on the Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik STORY Click Below

https://sites.google.com/site/josephludwigziarnik/home/home

Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox, in Support of Whistle Blowers, Citizen Journalists,
and giving radical voice to victims of cruelty, injustice, ethics violations,
and exposing those who seem to be above the LAW.

Crystal Cox Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Expose Elder Abuse
Stand with Whistle Blowers

Richard Block, Devon Bank Chicago, Sally Griffin, Joseph Ludwig Ziarnik, HIPAA Violations, Federal RICO Lawsuit, Illinois Elder Abuse, Chicago Elder Abuse, Citizen Journalists, Freedom of Speech, First Amendment Rights, Anti-Trust Violations, Banking Violations, Trustee Abuse of Po

I ask you to Investigate the Summit Bankruptcy Case Yourself and see if Blogger Crystal Cox was Really Defaming an Innocent Attorney, a Company that was Not Of Public Concern. Investigate this Story and see if you find that indeed they are Public Figures and that the story is not mine. And that there is reason to suspect Fraud on the Courts.

2012-03-29T00:10:00.000-07:00

Many, including Judge Marco Hernandez, seem to really, actually believe that I Caused Damage to the Reputation of Obsidian Finance Group and that I wanted Paid for Damage to their Reputation that I caused. This is simply NOT True.

I offered PR Services, as I am Media, and I am very good at such. This, having no money, was the only thing I had to offer, to negotiate with AFTER I had Received a Cease and Desist, and After a Lawsuit for 10 Million Dollars had been filed against me.

I did not create the information, the information came to me and I gave links to the documents, videos, information, depositions, court filings, insider emails, court audios and more that were already online, as well as adding in my commentary and occasional rant on the topic.

Here, Once again are links to information Proving that it was a story that was "Out There" long before I came along with my amazing gift of search engine placement that makes it seem like I am the only one telling the story, when it was never my story.

All Bloggers that expose corruption, post on alternative news, bloggers that post other people's stories, YOU all are depending on the Obsidian Vs. Cox case for what you do. What happened to me could happen to you.

I was telling the story of others, it was not my story nor did it involve anyone I knew.

Investigate the Summit Bankruptcy story yourself. It has nothing to do with me making an offer to "Settle" after they sent me a cease and desist and AFTER the Plaintiff filed a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit against me. This story has a life of it's own for anyone caring to look into the details instead of simply judging the messenger.

I did not cause the "Damage" to Kevin Padrick's Reputation. Kevin Padrick HIMSELF caused that by his own actions, EXPOSED by Insiders to a $40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy Proceeding.

I invite you to look at all the information that was nothing to do with Blogger Crystal Cox, and to post your own blog with your findings on the topic, independent of Crystal Cox Blogger sued for defamation.

The Link Below is Videos of Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung in July of 2009 just after I found out about her Bankruptcy Whistleblower Blog that posted documents, emails, contracts, videos and audios of the behind the scenes of the Summit Bankruptcy and the Legal Filing of an Objection to the Fees of Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group Kevin Padrick. Below is a link to 3 Videos that were on the Summit Bankruptcy Blog, where insider, Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung exposes the inside details of the Summit Bankruptcy, as she reaches out to get Creditors support in an Objection to the Fees filed by several insiders.
http://www.CrystalCox.com/2012/03/blogger-crystal-cox-was-always.html

Below is a Link to A Video Playlist of 3 Videos of Stephanie DeYoung's Blog I took before the Blog dropped the day after the Obsidian V. Cox Trial. There are also archives at Archive.org and other online locations at this time.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1D1A3737C9E48A57&feature=view_all

The Meeting that Kevin Padrick had with the Summit Principals when he still worked for them and Before he jumped the fence to work against them
http://www.youtube.com/user/KevinPadrick

Below is a Link to the Objection to the Fees Filed AGAINST Tonkon Torp, Obsidian Finance Group and Kevin Padrick. This was filed by several insiders, creditors and investors involved in the Summit Bankruptcy and Includes internal emails and more information.

The Court Filing, the Objection to the Fees of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Obsidian Finance Group and Kevin Padrick. Filed by Insiders, Creditors, Investors. And including insider emails, and information suggesting Tax Issues, and not from blogger Crystal Cox who was simply reporting the story.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/117384150/Obsidian-Finance-Group-Contract-with-Summit-Principals

Stephanie DeYoung's Depostion in Video Taken by David Aman of Tonkon Torp
http://www.youtube.com/user/SAIBankruptcy

Below is a Link to a Court Audio that was online for well over a year before Obsidian Finance Group, Kevin Padrick and Tonkon Torp Sued blogger Crystal Cox. This was never my story, I was researching and reporting on the story. Now the audio is posted at the link below.
http://www.anonymous-insider.com/media/090211.wma

Below is a Link to the Deposition of Summit Principal Mark Neuman, this was online for over a year before Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp Law firm sued Blogger Crystal Cox for Defamation.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/101645262/Mark-Neuman-Deposition---Kevin-Padrick-Obsidian-Finance-Group---David-Aman-Tonkon-Torp
deposition neumn

Insider Emails

( Read all of the Objection to the Fees above as there is emails in there as well)

Insider Email, Bankruptcy Case 08-37031 Document 511. Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Trustee Emails Sussman Shank, Perkins Coie, Terry Vance and Others
http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/insider-email-bankruptcy-case-08-37031.html

Kevin Padrick Email to Steven Hedberg of Perkins Coie

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/kevin-padrick-email-to-steven-hedberg.html

In the Summer of 2011, Kevin Padrick seems to have done the same thing in another Bankruptcy Case, this time in Washington State and HomeStreet Bank Filed an Objection to his Fees and Claimed Conflict of Interest, and in this One Kevin Padrick Seems to have Lost. Link to that Legal Case Below
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tstf6BAeXFHFmMaFodmURp6uUDWm6U1SqeqBu2HgSvw/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1

You Can Download a PDF at the Link Below
http://www.lulu.com/shop/judge-overstreet/homestreet-objection-to-fees/ebook/product-20024961.html

Or you can email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com for a very clear PDF of this court ruling proving that Kevin Padrick has had this happen before and was taken to court over it before.

Links to those Upset in Lake County Oregon over the Actions of Obsidian Finance Group

http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/docs/rulemaking/2009-11/Solar/Comment_Solar_2011-01-25.pdf?ga=t

http://www.bendbulletin.com/article/20100316/NEWS0107/3160403/

Be sure and also Research Longview Fibre and the way that Obsidian Finance Group was preying on that company and seemed to be lying about value and seemed to have been connected to Politician Gordon Smith in estimating timber values, the same Gordon Smith whom endorsed Judge Marco Hernandez as Did Politician Ron Wyden, whom also seems to be connected to Obsidian Finance Group, and they both seem connected to Bill Smith Properties whom recommended Obsidian Finance Group to the Summit Principals.

Longview Fibre Research
http://www.kevinpadrick.com/search/label/Longview%20Fibre

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WycHUOgl1b-LOopUGbRe5ca9od8FO79Zt1IaqILQW9g/edit?hl=en_US

http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2012/01/obsidian-finance-group-has-deep-roots.html

Oregon Solar Tax Credits Research
http://www.KevinPadrick.com/search/label/BETC
Obsidian Finance Group tried to get more then their share of Tax Credits, the State of Oregon Said NO and Obsidian Finance Group SUED the State of Oregon.

Tax Credit Rules
http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/CONS/BUS/BETC.shtml

Order Approving Kevin Padrick's Fees, though Judge Dunn said in the Court Audio he had not yet approved, when their was objections raised at the Conflict that Kevin Padrick, allegedly took proprietary information from his then clients Summit, and used this information against his clients after charging his clients a $100,000 to gather the information, seemingly under the false pretense of helping summit to form a plan of reorganization as the contract stated. This money was kept on the books of Obsidian Finance Group and none was refunded to Summit, this was affirmed by blogger Crystal Cox asking Patricia Whittington of Obsidian Finance Group, who is the VP and head accountant I believe. (If you want a copy of the Trial Transcript to prove what Obsidian Finance Group said under Oath, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com)

Here is that Order
http://www.kevinpadrick.com/2012/01/order-approving-what-looks-like-115.html

If you would like more documents, emails, information that are not FROM me so you can truly investigate this story, please email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, I am happy to give you whatever information you need to investigate the TRUTH about the Summit Bankruptcy, the Department of Justice Conflict of Interest, the Bankruptcy Judge pushing for Kevin Padrick as Trustee, the Creditors Committee Attorney having worked with Kevin Padrick, the DOJ Trustee and Tonkon Torp's Leon Simson in the same law firm previously and much more.

This story is something I investigated and wrote on for years. I did not make it up, and the post I lost $2.5 Million on was not false, in my opinion, and according to my research.

Just because one Oregon CPA's Opinion convinced a jury and I was tricked into not testifying, this does not mean I am guilty of defamation. For the involvement of Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Obsidian Finance Group and Kevin Padrick in the Summit Bankruptcy was a scandal long before I showed up and gave powerful internet voice to their victims.

If you cannot read any document, please email me for a clear copy.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

More Research Links on the Summit Bankruptcy Issues, Conflicts of Interest

http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/bankruptcy-judge-randall-dunn-portland.html

http://www.kevinpadrick.com/2012/01/kevin-padrick-obsidian-finance-group.html

Kevin Padrick claimed at one time that Terry Vance told him to meet with the Creditors, Yet that Was not True. So was Sussman Shank and Perkins Coie Conspiring with Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp ?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/110557939/Kevin-Padrick-Obsidian-Finance-Group-Claims-Terry-Vance-Told-him-to-Meet-with-Creditors-Vance-Says-He-did-not-Say-that

Possible Bankruptcy Code Violations
http://www.objectiontofees.com/2012/01/possible-104a-bankruptcy-code.html

http://industry-whistleblower.blogspot.com/2012/03/blogger-crystal-cox-was-always.html

Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications. Greg Euston is not a very Good Corporate Reputation Manager, that is for Sure. WR Grace has the WORST Reputation of ANY Company Ever. Greg Euston is working on the Reputation of WR Grace and Fred Festa. Greg Euston, McEachern Communication. Greg Euston of McEachern Communication. Greg Euston is researching Blogger Crystal Cox. Good Luck Greg Euston of McEachern Communications.

2012-03-27T13:01:00.002-07:00

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is all over my blogs. It seems that Greg Euston is not a very Good Corporate Reputation Manager, though Greg Euston of McEachern Communications boasts about being such on the McEachern Communications website.

WR Grace has the WORST Reputation of ANY Company Ever in Existence. There really is no recovery for Fred Festa's gig WR Grace. As WR Grace is in bed with the Devil, in my Opionion.

WR Grace cannot take away lives, leaving suffering and despair in their wake and then hire Greg Euston of McEachern Communications to make it all better. Meanwhile decades of victims and their families are still suffering at the hands of WR Grace. Greg Euston is working on the Reputation of WR Grace and Fred Festa, and to do this is clumsily researching what I am say, and showing huge cyber footprints in doing so. Very Bad Idea Greg Euston of McEachern Communication. For I am the best at what I do, digging up secrets, showing who is in bed with whom, investigations and exposing pay offs and secret deals and getting the scoop that WR Grace CEO's don't want known.

The WR Grace Bankruptcy seems to be riddled with "secret hand shakes", I have just been to darn busy to dive into all the material that is out there on that.

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is researching Blogger Crystal Cox, other wise known as Mad Dog Blogger, Crazy Crystal Cox, the "Unhinged Blogger and many other names with the point being I am the VERY BEST AT WHAT I DO. And that is EXPOSE the BAD GUYS like Fred Festa and guys like Greg Euston of McEachern Communications who cover for Fred Festa and WR Grace. So Good Luck Greg Euston of McEachern Communications.

Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is so bad at Corporate Reputation Management that I see him on my blogs, he is not good at Investigative Research Online that is a Given. And now that Fumbling Greg Euston of McEachern Communications has made such a ruckus on my blogs, odds are I will soon take over the search engines for the name Greg Euston, whom I had never heard of until Greg Euston of McEachern Communications. exposed his searching on my blogs.

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is taking screen shots of my blogs, why is Greg Euston doing this? I mean why not email me, if I got it wrong, let me know.

Greg Euston is causing more of a PR problem for Greg Euston, McEachern Communications and WR Grace Fred Festa by sleuthing around on my blogs, as if he will figure out what I am up to or my motive?

See Greg Euston, McEachern Communications my family has died and is dying, but besides that WR Grace, Fred Festa sure seems to be in bed with Max Baucus, Senator Grassley and a few more regarding those Big Drug Companies that love to force Prescriptions that further harm people.

Greg Euston, WR Grace is one reputation that is pretty much impossible to clean up. Greg Euston, McEachern Communications, rumor has it in Montana that WR Grace has paid off judges to get judgements in their favor, knowing full well that WR Grace and the State of Montana knew what WR Grace was doing to the residents.

Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is researching what Blogger Crystal Cox has to say about WR Grace, thing is I have been very busy lately. I do intend to expose every detail of the layers of the WR Grace Bankruptcy, and all WR Grace's dirty deals, Lobbying and more. SO Greg Euston, McEachern Communications whatever you think your doing on my blogs, you, Greg Euston, McEachern Communications are accomplishing quite the opposite.

Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is so feeble at internet investigations he had to research how to find a "cached" site, and did this from my blog. Geez, not much of a Savvy Investigator that is for sure. Greg Euston, McEachern Communications is looking like a fool in my OPINION.

So who is Greg Euston, McEachern Communications. Well Let's take a look at Greg Euston, McEachern Communications.

Greg Euston of McEachern Communications is going to need an army of bloggers to defend the Horrible, Evil Reputation of WR Grace. I have family member recently diagnosed, family died painful slow deaths. I personally know hundreds of people that have died or suffered massively in the wake of the Evils of WR Grace. So WR Grace, Fred Festa GOOD LUCK with Covering UP the Sins of WR Grace, it is Impossible. Oh and the Judge, your "ALLEGED" to have paid of in Montana, and the other Politicians, Lawyers, and Cronies, well that too will not go away just because of pockets greased

Some Online Tidbits Regarding Greg Euston of McEachern Communications.

"Greg Euston is a senior corporate communications and public relations executive who provides strategic counsel and goal-oriented programs to his clients.

"Greg Euston

Greg Euston is a senior corporate communications and public relations executive who provides strategic counsel and goal-oriented programs to his clients. With 20 years of experience, he has helped companies with corporate reputation, CEO and senior executive communications, change management, crisis and issues management and public relations campaign development and execution.

Greg founded McGraw Euston Associates to work with organizations that need sound communications advice.

Prior to that he was a Senior Vice President for MS&L Worldwide where he worked with a range of companies in the healthcare, financial services, manufacturing and government arenas. During that time, he started MS&L Atlanta’s Environmental Business and Responsibility Practice to serve the agency’s government, non-profit and corporate clients and their natural resources and sustainability assignments.

Since 1999, Greg has worked with W.R. Grace & Co. senior management on restoring the company’s reputation following revelations of asbestos contamination in Montana and an unrelated Chapter 11 filing.

Greg’s experience includes economic development work with government agencies in Peru, Ind., Kettering, Ohio, and Caribou, Maine, each of which had lost a military base to partial or full closure. He also has worked with the State of Illinois to protect and promote the coal industry.

Recently, Greg led a comprehensive internal and external communications program supporting the launch of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals in the U.S., the result of Bayer’s acquisition of Schering AG.

Other relevant experience includes leading a major change management program at AstraZeneca and providing executive communications support to Schering-Plough during its turnaround.

Greg’s experience includes five years as a daily newspaper reporter in Fayetteville, N.C. and Winchester, Va. before entering public relations. He earned a bachelor of arts in journalism and American history from Washington & Lee University in Lexington, Va."

Source
http://www.mceacherncommunications.com/bios/bio-euston.html

Much more on McEachern Communications, Greg Euston Coming Soon. As I intend to show you just how bad McEachern Communications, Greg Euston is at Corporate Reputation Managment, when he brags on his site who he works for and leaves GIANT dumb footprints all over the "Enemies" blog, website... Got a tip on McEachern Communications, Greg Euston ? Email your McEachern Communications, Greg Euston Tip to me Crystal Cox at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza has his Buddies Blogging to Promote What a Great Guy Marc Randazza is. Thing is that does not change the Fact that Marc Randazza tried to threaten a Blogger, a Domainer over a Domain Name with His Name in it, and work with the Plaintiff in a Major Free Speech Case Because Marc Randazza's Ego WON over the First Amendment Rights of All.

2012-03-16T10:58:00.002-07:00

Marc Randazza ~ now Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group, has his buddies blogging about Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group in an attempt for Marc Randazza to hide the Marc Randazza, Crystal Cox Scandal and Massive VIOLATIONS of my Free SPEECH and First Amendment Rights by Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza Scandal

Here are Some Marc Randazza Tidbits from this Marc Randazza Love Post
The Quote Posts are in BLUE, and the Source of the Quotes is Listed At the End.

"Marc Randazza sees the Rakofsky suit, and far too many like it, as an attempt to pervert the power of law to the cause of stifling speech. He leapt, almost unbidden, to the defense of the Rakofsky blawgers in need of representation. "

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group is the one attempting to "pervert" power.

Marc Randazza is the KING of Perverting Power.

Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group tried to bluff Blogger Crystal Cox and tell me I had no right to own, buy and blog on Marc Randazza . com. Yet, Marc Randazza, defending others in Domain Name Ownership with the actual names of people and domain names themselves that accuse people of horrible acts. This is Ok to Marc Randazza, yet it is not ok for Crystal Cox, Blogger, Domainer to have purchased Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza tried to pull a power trip over Crystal Cox, me and tell me I had no right to own Marc Randazza .com, which is simply NOT True. Marc Randazza STOMPS on my rights of Free Speech, and works against me in a case where if I don't get my case over turned, all BLOGGERS will be affected, no matter what the Lies of David Carr of the New Times is Telling You.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is the biggest case EVER regarding One Individual Blogger, that is Truly Independent, if Marc Randazza and the Plaintiff shut down my voice then this affects all Bloggers till the end of time, or the Internet as we know it.

The Obsidian V. Cox case is truly about a Blogger getting wind of a story and fighting for the victims, selflessly for 4 years and losing everything to stand up for what is right. The Obsidian V. Cox case is a case about finding information, digging through years of documents, getting tips and emails, reading document after documents, interviewing insiders, reading legal filings, reading contracts, listening to court audios, reading court transcripts and EXPOSING the inside details of a $40 Bankruptcy. The Obsidian V. Cox case is about the Plaintiff, Obsidian Finance Group trying to hide their secrets and what really happened and about David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm protecting the involvement of Tonkon Torp, Leon Simson, David Peterson and David Aman himself in the Summit Bankruptcy.

David Aman is still fighting to silence blogger Crystal Cox, because David Aman was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal as you see in the Objection to the Fees filed by several insiders in that case. There was also emails to and with David Aman and the Department of Justice, and with other attorneys involved as they tried to Tell David Aman, Tonkon Torp of what was going on and how violated the rights of creditors and seemed to Violate Bankruptcy Code.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, knows that what Crystal Cox Blogger is saying is TRUE, yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm fights to take domain names to shut me down. Thing is Obsidian V. Cox will be overturned, TRUTH will win for REAL over alleged Defamation and investigators will really find out the TRUTH about the Behind the Scenes of the Summit Bankruptcy that they have for over 4 years ignored. David S. Aman, Tonkon Torp Lawyer knows that blogger Crystal Cox did not have actual malice and in fact had and has actual documents of truth, fact and anyone who can read can see that what Blogger Crystal Cox has and is Exposing has tons of documentation to back it up.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm fought for Kevin Padrick as Trustee in every issue over the Summit Scandal. And David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm even deposed Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung to ask about blogger Crystal Cox, yet did not contact me until 2 years later when I was Sued for 10 Million Dollars for EXPOSING THEM.

David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm is fighting to this day to try and shut down my blog, and this is to protect David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law firm and Leon Simson, David Peterson and others at Tonkon Torp, as they were involved in the alleged corruption I am exposing.

More on the above Blog Post Praising Marc Randazza

"I had heard of Marc Randazza prior to being named as a Rakofsky defendant, but I had never had any contact with him. His presence and reputation were known to me through his blog, The Legal Satyricon, and through the blogging of others, such as Scott Greenfield or Ken-at-Popehat who know him firsthand.

Marc Randazza is a zealot, but a zealot of the best kind. His zealotry finds its focus in the First Amendment, and particularly the portions of that Amendment protecting freedom of speech and expression. Speech, without regard to its couth, its coarseness, its wisdom, its dunderheadedness, its cultural value, its tendency to discomfit or offend, is embraced by the First Amendment, and Marc Randazza has devoted his career to its preservation. Like Horatius at the bridge, Marc Randazza stands beside the Sluice of Speech to defend it and to see that its flow stays as wide and as free and as indiscriminate as possible. "

This person seems to really like Marc Randazza, and to have had a good experience with Marc Randazza, I can respect that, thing is the facts of Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox are still the same. Marc Randazza really did violate my rights. Marc Randazza really did tell members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented me, and Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff in my case to negotiate a deal on my behalf that I was not aware of. This violated my rights, gave the bad guys my strategy and inside information and was simply WRONG. Months later Marc Randazza really did contact the Plaintiff and offer to give a Subpoena to TAKE the Domain Names of Blogger, Domainer Crystal Cox in order to help the Plaintiff to silence my voice and the REWARD to Marc Randazza, I Believe, to be, Control over Marc Randazza .com .

Source of Quotes above in Blue.
http://www.declarationsandexclusions.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-marc-randazza-marc-randazza.html

Folks, email me for my story, I plan to post more as soon as I have time, thing is Marc Randazza violated my Constitutional Rights. Marc Randazza went to the "Other Side" in Obsidian V. Cox, after talking to me and Marc Randazza did NOT have my permission. Marc Randazza misled me, and Marc Randazza suggested I not appeal for the Good of Other Bloggers, which I was open to, if that was best, however Turns out Marc Randazza may have gave me bad information that may have affected the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers and Citizen Journalists.

Marc Randazza knows that the Oregon Retraction Laws Apply to Blogger Crystal Cox, Marc Randazza knows that Crystal Cox had no "actual malice" and that I, Blogger Crystal Cox, to this day believe, that there was foul play and illegal behavior in the actions of David Aman, Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

Check your Facts, they are there, Depose me, Marc Randazza, and all involved, check phone and email records and you will see that indeed Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff without the Defendants approval and Marc Randazza gave the Plaintiff privileged strategy and information regarding Blogger Crystal Cox. Marc Randazza told other member of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox, and that he, Marc Randazza had already spoke with the Plaintiff's side to negotiate a deal. Marc Randazza to these same folks that he represented me and this caused me more stress in my case, as I had to explain what happened with Marc Randazza, and that he did not work for me, even though he was putting in "time and energy" on my case, and acting as my attorney without my permission.

If Marc Randazza lies about all this then it's a feud among Lawyers on who is lying, as I have proof. The Marc Randazza article above, may well be one Marc Randazza opinion or Marc Randazza Experience, Thing Is it is Certainly not my Experience with Marc Randazza of The Legal Satyricon, Randazza Legal Group.

See Marc Randazza, and all reading this, I really am telling the TRUTH and anyone that can read, hear, see, can easily see that TRUTH.

Instead most, including Marc Randazza, simply believe FORBES, the New York Times and the Plaintiff's lies about me, as they fight to cover up $40 Million in Secrets, and this also makes Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp look bad to the Energy Companies they Lobby For, to those who issue Solar Tax Credits, to PacifiCorp, and more.

The Thing is, I am telling the Truth to the best of my ability and have been for years on this same matter. Look at the Summit Objection to the Fees, the Lake County Residents Upset at Obsidian, the Objection to the Fees in Washington filed Against Obsidian Finance Group for the SAME thing that Kevin Padrick did in the Summit Bankruptcy. There is easily proven pattern and history for a Federal RICO Lawsuit. And now Marc Randazza has jumped in the middle of it all in the alleged name of Free Speech and First Amendment rights, yet at the same time Marc Randazza, has violated my Free Speech and First Amendment Rights.

I Trusted Marc Randazza, and he betrayed me, Plain and Simple.

Marc Randazza REFUSES Answering my Questions, though I am Pro Se and Marc Randazza has been Subpoenaed by the Plaintiff, Allegedly.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/crystal-cox-pro-se-blogger-has-some.html

Marc Randazza is a First Amendment Badass Alright and that is to TAKE our First Amendment Rights in being on the WRONG side of Obsidian V. Cox.

Marc Randazza is a BUTTHURT Hypocrite. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox, because he is "Butthurt" that Crystal Cox Bought Mark Randazza .com, Yet Marc Randazza says "Butthurt is Butthurt" and No Recourse is ALLOWED for Sandra Fluke, So Why Does Butt Hurt Marc Randazza GET his Pay Day REVENGE?

2012-03-10T21:50:00.003-08:00

"Butthurt is not Defamation. Butthurt is Butthurt, and you don't get paid for that in the United States of America. Not on my watch." ~ Marc J. Randazza

Marc Randazza, Free Speech Attorney STOMPS on First Amendment Rights of Blogger Crystal Cox. Marc Randazza, Crystal Cox WAR. First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza on the Wrong Side of Free Speech in Obsidian Vs. Cox. Marc Randazza soon to Go to Portland Oregon to Give Marc Randazza Deposition AGAINST Blogger Crystal Cox in Domain Name Dispute.

2012-03-09T23:31:00.003-08:00

Marc Randazza, Celebrity First Amendment Attorney, has his Panties in a Wad over Crystal Cox Blogger (Not Porn Star) rejecting him as her Attorney, and Marc Randazza, is fighting back by conspiring with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set up Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza has not done his homework on Obsidian Finance Group, or Kevin Padrick to determine if there a reason to investigate, or to believe that indeed Blogger Crystal Cox does have those Journalistic Standards that Marc Randazza spoke of in their first conversation.

See, Marc Randazza went to school to be a journalist, and does not seem to be interested in journalistic adventures, such as reading, or Marc Randazza would easily see that Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group are in some major conflicts of interest; massive lobbying and solar tax credits issue, People in Lake County Oregon are very upset at their property rights being run over by Obsidian Finance Group, HomeStreet bank out of Washington filed an Objection to the Fees of Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, There is history of questionable behavior over the Longview Fibre Deal and Aloha Lumber, and the Oregon Trail Issues.

Marc Randazza is so upset that Blogger Crystal Cox bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza cannot see the forest for the trees. And in this Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage.

Marc Randazza’s ego is leading him around. Oh, and about the Greater Good, Marc Randazza told Crystal Cox he was impressed with her, me, for standing up for and even being willing to not file an appeal for the Greater Good if that’s what he took. Marc Randazza told blogger Crystal Cox that it was very encouraging to hear that she would choose, to not appeal if that was best for lobby efforts and the good of all Bloggers and Citizen Journalists. And yet Marc Randazza, in a pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox is now working against the First Amendment Rights of all by working with the Plaintiff’s Camp in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to set up Blogger Crystal Cox, and to throw a fit over a Domain name that he was not smart enough to buy, Marc Randazza .com .

Marc Randazza, does not seem to care who is guilty of what. All Marc Randazza can seem to see is red, because Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him for being a controlling ass and making deals behind her back and telling the WORLD that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox Blogger, when clearly he did not.

So in his rage, Marc Randazza has staged a Subpoena, even though he contacted the Plaintiff and offered himself up to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a Lesson. See, Marc Randazza is working with David Aman of Tonkon Torp in attempting to silence blogger Crystal Cox who is continuing to expose; Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Obsidian Renewables, Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice, Judge Randall Dunn, Perkins Coie Law Firm and Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Law Firm and Tom Stilley and Susan Ford, Miller Nash Law Firm, US Bankruptcy Code Violations in the Summit Bankruptcy, and events surrounding the Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon.

Ok So What Happened? How did I, Crystal Cox Blogger begin this pissing match with Marc Randazza, Porn Star Attorney Extraordinaire?

See, after my 2.5 Million Dollar Set Up to “Attempt” to Hide the Secrets of Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp and other Big Oregon Law Firms and Corporations, well, one of my Bloggers contacted Marc Randazza and I agreed to a 3 way conversation to interview Marc Randazza, and he had agreed with my Blogger to talk with me in the possibility of taking my case.

During this call Marc Randazza said that if he took the case he would need money for a certain amount of costs and that it would be an expensive case to file appeal. He said, in a case like this he would normally charge at least $75,000. However, he was considering Pro Bono due to the Media attention I was getting, but even in that would need cost for copies and to be in a hotel in California for the appeal, if he or someone he recommended were to take the case.

Marc Randazza gave many signs during this call that Marc Randazza would most likely not represent me.

During this call Marc Randazza said he was concerned of the “record” and had to take a look at it before deciding. I said that was a responsible thing to do, he said he would look at my documents and get back to me, he did not get back to me, yet told others he represented me, more on that in a bit.

Marc Randazza told me on this call that I had “made a mess,” which I found very slamming as what I do is for the Greater Good and what I was exposing was and is on the right side of the law and certainly on the right side of the Moral Compass. Marc Randazza saying this, let me know that he had no idea that what I did was a ‘calling,’ it was for massive change and a good thing to bring attention to this issue. Marc Randazza treated me as if I had made a “mess” and with complete disrespect. When in fact, I am creating “Media” and “Legal” attention to something that is VERY important for the Greater Good of ALL.

Marc Randazza said that he was concerned with my “Journalistic Standards”, SHOCKING isn't it, a Porn King Attorney representing folks that "Society" judges and Marc Randazza is judging and slamming my “Journalistic Standards”? Anyway this disrespectful comment led me to believe that Marc Randazza seemed to have been eating up the bad information about me, this was another sign to me that Marc Randazza was not going to represent me.

I am an Investigative Blogger. And a Very Good ONE. For Over 3 years, I have read contracts, insider emails, legal briefs, documents, LLC Agreements, Legal Filings and I listened to Audio’s of Court Sessions, watched videos of depositions and insider meetings and I interviewed, and yes took notes from the side of the Debtors, Investors, Creditors and more in the Summit Bankruptcy, deeper than any other news outlet. I have covered this story in depth and linked to lots of proof and documentation. The Media Bloggers Association should pay close attention, as what I was doing was exposing documents, and linking to those documents, and this is what most all bloggers do. The fact that I curse, Capitalize in Odd Places and have my own "Independent Style", well that make me legally "media" as well, and it does not change the Facts. I do what ALL good Investigative Bloggers, Alternative News and Citizen Journalists Do.

Big Media wants to shut me so they lie about me, and for some reason Marc Randazza ate up what Big Media said about me, even though it was NOT True. Marc Randazza did not care about my side. Marc Randazza simply ran me over with his personal opinions and agenda.

Marc Randazza told me that he used to work for Big Media but now he works for bloggers and porn stars, because Marc Randazza claimed that Big Media had the agenda of creating a Monopoly so they make more money. Yet NOW Marc Randazza is working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox.

Marc Randazza told me that he would have to talk to his existing clients, such as The Media Association of Bloggers, to see if there was a conflict before deciding to represent me or not. Marc Randazza claimed he would get back to me on this. Instead, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff’s side and tried to cut a deal WITHOUT my consent, without “getting back to me” and without discussing if he represented me, wanted to represent me or if there was a Conflict. Meanwhile Marc Randazza, of The Media Bloggers Association (MBA) , told lots of people in the “business” that he represented Blogger Crystal Cox, yet that was NOT True. I had agreed to work with another Lawyer and this created a situation that caused me stress, and almost lost me the Lawyer I really wanted.

Did Marc Randazza have to “discuss” a conflict with the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) in any way BEFORE Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff’s side and tried to work out a deal, as if he represented me? I was told at that time by other members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was talking with the Plaintiff’s side and trying to work out some arrangement regarding money, or a change to case law. I was Pro Se for a year and I wrote over 50 Court Filed Documents myself. I was and AM in the KNOW on my Case and Marc Randazza simply left me out, as if I had no brain, no rights and with total disrespect for me, Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza simply and certainly unethically took it upon himself to contact the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian V. Cox, without my knowledge and without getting back to me on if he wanted to work with me or not, Marc Randazza simply left me hanging with time running out and was working behind my back on a deal. Is this Legal? Well it is certainly NOT Ethical and certainly shows no respect for bloggers nor the First Amendment Rights that Marc Randazza, Allegedly wants to protect.

Also on that first phone call Marc Randazza said he thought it was funny that the Plaintiff thinks they can get $2.5 Million out of me, and now Marc Randazza has offered himself up to help them get any assets they think I have and ESPECIALLY that $10 Domain Name, Marc Randazza .com, that dumb shit Marc Randazza NEVER Registered for himself. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to take Domain Names, which is my only way to make a living, and all in the name of “Constitutional Rights” What? This makes no sense and is NOT True.

Marc Randazza is Vindictive, plain and simply. He was not chosen in the BIGGEST case that the blogsphere has EVER seen regarding one blogger, and a case that will change laws and is already a world wide phenomena and that blogger, me, had the nerve to buy Marc Randazza .com and to even suggest that Marc Randazza hire her to do PR for him. Marc Randazza is so mad that Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of Marc Randazza’s EGO.

In one of Marc Randazza’s last communications to me he said “do you really want to make an enemy of me?” Marc Randazza thinks that a blogger, a woman being smarter than him is making him an enemy.

So Marc Randazza is on a mission to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson and be “Deposed” to rant about me to the Plaintiff to attempt to further quash my “Free Speech” and First Amendment Rights, and thereby affecting all BLOGGERS and Alternative Media Worldwide.

Marc Randazza told me that if I appeal it MAY create Bad Law and that maybe I should consider NOT appealing so that my case can be used to Lobby for others in changing laws. I was in agreement, and told Marc Randazza that I simply wanted advice from those surrounding the First Amendment Rights Issue and the First Amendment Bar, so that I could do what was best for all Bloggers, Citizens Journalists and the First Amendment Rights of All. Marc Randazza said he was very glad to hear that, and it made him want to work with me even more.

Marc Randazza said, if I take your case then my Ethical Duty is to you, yet Marc Randazza acted as if he had taken my case, without talking to me about it, and was already negotiating with the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Blogger Crystal Cox.

To me, Crystal Cox, this says that Marc Randazza was already acting as my attorney, and did have an Ethical Duty to me to not disclose my stance, emails, or private conversations with him. Yet Marc Randazza contacted the “Other” side to Negotiate, and that was in December. Now Marc Randazza is using information I gave him in a Deposition that Marc Randazza is giving the "Plaintiff" to attempt to put me in my place and to take a $10 Domain Name that Marc Randazza was not smart enough to buy, and this, in my opinion, is an Ethical Breach, if not Plain Ol’ Illegal.

Last December I found out that Marc Randazza was Negotiating with the Plaintiff’s Side OF MY LEGAL CASE without my PERMISSION. I was told this by other members of the First Amendment Bar that wanted to represent me. They had heard that Marc Randazza represented me and even spoke with Marc Randazza, and he had flat out claimed to be representing me, yet Marc Randazza had not told me he was even still considering representing me, Blogger Crystal Cox. I was told by other Attorneys that I needed to let Marc Randazza know that he did not represent me, because Marc Randazza was telling everybody that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox on Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox (I have Emails and more to Prove this).

Marc Randazza has so little respect for potential clients that Marc Randazza simply does as

Marc Randazza pleases without his client’s or potential client’s knowledge.

Can I Sue Marc Randazza for trying to make a deal, acting as if he was my attorney without my consent? I certainly can file Bar Complaints in NV, CA, MA, FL, and AZ to Start.

Marc Randazza is now part of a Witch Hunt to discredit blogger Crystal Cox, in effort to protect Big Corporations such as Obsidian Finance Group, Pacific Power, Government Oversight people such as Judge Randall Dunn and Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice and Law Firms such as Tonkon Torp, Sussman Shank and Perkins Coie.

Marc Randazza is sacrificing the Free Speech rights of ALL in Marc Randazza’s own personal Ego trip over a blogger that bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is NOT a man for the rights of Free Speech. Marc Randazza is a man for the personal EGO Trip of Marc Randazza.

So how is Marc Randazza working with the “Bad Guys” and on the Opposite Side of Free Speech?

Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to set me up. Marc Randazza is pretending to be under subpoena and pretending to have no choice, but the truth is that Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff, and Marc Randazza initiated dealing with them against me because his EGO is bent that I did not CHOOSE him and I bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is even flying to Portland to be deposed at the Tonkon Torp Law Firm. Gee I wonder whose dime this is on? And all this because they want to Silence a Blogger Exposing Corruption and to spite a Pro Se Defendant who went with a different lawyer and bought the whiny baby’s name as a dotcom.

Marc Randazza is on an Ego Trip and it affects all Bloggers, yet Marc Randazza acts as if he works for the best interest of Bloggers and for the best interest of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) .

Marc Randazza does not work for the best interest of Bloggers, nor of the Best interest of the First Amendmant. Marc Randazza is on an Ego trip for Marc Randazza and so in creating a war over a domain name that he was too dumb to buy and in being pissed off because I told him I did not want him to represent me, well now Marc Randazza is working directly against the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers.

So Who Is Marc Randazza ?

Marc Randazza , Marc John Randazza of Randazza Legal Group with offices Miami, Phoenix & Toronto. Marc Randazza is an Attorney Licensed in Arizona, Nevada, California, Massachusetts, and Florida.

Marc Randazza claims to fight for the First Amendment rights of all. Marc Randazza is an Attorney specializing in protecting porn and online gambling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza )

According to wikipedia.org, Marc Randazza’s first case was representing a fraternity at Boston University, when the brothers of that fraternity were accused of destroying a house they had rented and accused of other misconduct. Marc Randazza then began practicing in Florida as a real estate attorney. Marc Randazza seems to have started right out working for the wrong side of the law and certainly the wrong side of the law in representing drunken fraternity brother’s who seem to have destroyed some one’s property.

Marc Randazza, according to wikipedia, “Soon thereafter, moved to Orlando, Florida where his practice in First Amendment and media law expanded. He started representing defendants in SLAPP suits, pornography businesses, and protesters, in often unpopular constitutional law matters.” Marc Randazza seems to have started right out of the gate on his First Amendment Soap Box defending those seemingly on the wrong side of the law and the wrong side of the moral compass. Yet Marc Randazza slams me for “Journalistic Standards” and works directly against a blogger whom he had acted as if he once worked for in this same manner. Geez, WHAT a Mess Ol’ Marc Randazza has made of all this.

Marc Randazza is a Public Figure, indeed having been in debates on Fox news and other television and having worked for Big Media as Marc Randazza told me. So why are there not more bloggers EXPOSING Marc Randazza ? Well I guess, Marc Randazza really was for blogger’s rights, until he got all BENT over Blogger Crystal Cox and decided to be part of taking down the Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers.

According to wikipedia, “"Randazza has a practice that primarily focuses on the areas of First Amendment litigation, adult entertainment, trademark and copyright litigation, and domain name arbitration disputes." So you see Marc Randazza, has to save face and punish me somehow because I am Smarter than Marc Randazza. Marc Randazza represented people in WIPO cases yet claims he does not care about my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose Law Firm out of New York, in which I Legally won the right to own the names in dispute. This is a case precedence of my Legal Right to buy Marc Randazza .com, and though Marc Randazza is some big deal in Domain Name Arbitration, Marc Randazza did not have the Brains to buy Marc Randazza dotcom.

WOW, guess all that PORN has fried ol’ Marc Randazza’s brain so he has now teamed up with the Evil David Aman of Tonkon Torp who, along with his “Plaintiff” Kevin Padrick was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal and named in the Objection to Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy in which several insiders filed to Object to the Massive Conflicts of Interest and Outrageous Fees involving Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick

More on that at the Link Below for Now (if Links are Broken due to stolen Domain Names, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com for a copy of the Objection to Fees in Summit and in the Homestreet Bank Scandal involving Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, as well as other documents of those who really do and have had issue with Obsidian and Kevin Padrick )

http://www.objectiontofees.com/

Sure must be a low blow to the Massive Ego of Marc Randazza to have been trumped by a blogger, and a Woman. Marc Randazza is one of those classic examples of Attorneys who simply shut you up and toss you in the back seat of a legal case as if he is smarter and can handle it, which obviously Marc Randazza is not smarter then blogger Crystal Cox even if Marc Randazza is Conspiring to set up Blogger Crystal Cox to protect his Ego.

According to wikipedia Marc Randazza serves as General Counsel to Corbin Fisher, who apparently is smart enough to own their dotcom, careful though there is a warning on the home page of naked men engaging in sex acts. Guess I better not buy CorbinFisherSucks.com, though it sounds like a fun name to have, but it seems that Corbin Fisher (an Adult Media Company) is a smart company owning their own dotcom and all. Too bad Corbin Fisher’s general counsel Dickhead Marc Randazza was not so smart. I think Blogger “Crystal Cox” would make a much better General Counsel for Corbin Fisher, don’t You?

According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza has “represented a number of well-known adult entertainment companies including Kink.com, Bang Bus, and Milf Hunter. He also represents media businesses such as BME and bloggers in SLAPP suits.” So the Porn King Attorney Mark Randazza is all for Freedom of Speech, ... well EVERYTHING, except a Woman Being Smarter than Him and buying a dotcom of MarcRandazza.com. Marc Randazza can’t have that, so he is off to Portland to a Deposition of the Asset’s of Crystal Cox in order to conspire to set up Blogger Crystal Cox and teach her, me, a lesson for being SMARTER than Ego Maniac Marc Randazza.

Maybe his buddy David Aman will Take the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after my Judgement and Maybe David Aman, attorney for Obsidian Finance Group, will simply GIVE the domain name Marc Randazza .com to Marc Randazza then he can STOP Crying over it.

Marc Randazza represented Anthony Ciolli. What was the Anthony Ciolli case Really About? Postings on a blog about people? Defamation, Harassment? Was there behind the scenes manuevering to get parties in the lawsuit to back off? What Really Happened? Got a Tip? Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Though Marc Randazza tells me he don’t care about WIPO, yes Marc Randazza actually said that in an email to Blogger Crystal Cox, anyway, According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza “has represented the defendant in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, a case before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) filed by political commentator Glenn Beck, ...The WIPO arbitrator ruled against Beck in the case, and in favor of Randazza's client.” Yet when I told Marc Randazza that I had represented myself in a WIPO case over an Attorney’s name and won, he said he did not care. Yet it sure seems that Marc Randazza is proud of his WIPO case win, in my opinion, of course.

SO what was the Beck V. Eiland-Hall case, and just what was Marc Randazza defending as a Free Speech right? Well the Domain name in that dispute was, (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") .

Marc Randazza says I have no right to own a domain name that corresponds to his name, Geez Marc Randazza did not think that in this domain name (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") I Guess that is just those double standards of Mr. Marc Randazza popping up again.

So Marc Randazza fought for the right for his client to own the domain name, "www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" - as you see at this link http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody
Hypocrite Marc Randazza thinks it is OK for his client to buy and own a sick domain name such as that, that accuses a man of rape and murder, but it is not OK for me to own Marc Randazza .com. Seems a bit of a double standard, don't you think? It is not ok to own that kind of a domain name, it is sick, it accuses a man of rape and murder and yet is defended by Marc Randazza. That site seems to be gone now, so what happened, who bought it? What was the "pay off," the circumstance? Got a Tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Marc Randazza knows all about WIPO, and Copyrights, and Intellectual Property so why not just take the Domain Name? Why get on the Bandwagon of the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to Stomp on the Free Speech Rights of All Citizen Journalists and to deliberately STOMP on the First Amendment Rights of every United States Citizen who my case, Obsidian V. Cox now represents in Free Speech Issues? You see if Asshole Marc Randazza had a Right to take the Domain Name then he would right? So why work with the "Bad Guys" to steal the name, because he wants to make a point and steal the Domain Name he was not smart enough to buy. And all with the Collateral Damage of the Rights of Free Speech of Every Blogger World Wide, and of the First Amendment Rights of Everyone, Period?

Marc Randazza thinks, as you will see in the emails, that I should have asked him before I bought Marc Randazza Dotcom, gee did his client ask Glen Beck if they could buy "GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" ? I bet NOT.

Marc Randazza is simply pissed off at a Woman who did not want to let him represent her, ME, even For Free, because he was an arrogant aggressive ass to me and because he went behind my back making deals BEFORE I even agreed to be his client. I have more respect for myself than to let a BULLY, Lying, Thug Such as Marc Randazza represent me, even if for FREE.

Marc Randazza is so mad at me for not choosing him, and at me, Blogger Crystal Cox for buying the Asshole's name as a dotcom, that Marc Randazza is making the World his Collateral Damage in a Marc Randazza pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox.

Thing is, no matter what you Pricks set me up for, the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH, the Criminal in all this REMAINS to be the Criminal, Kevin Padrick remains to be suspect of White Collar Crimes, and all those involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal will remain to have been involved, and your foul play, ethics violations and double standards will one day bite you in the ASS. As the TRUTH has a way of rising to the TOP. I have Faith.

Marc Randazza is all for Free Speech and First Amendment Rights, but only in his selfish, immoral world of what Free Speech is and that does not seem to include citizen journalists exposing corruption or Internet Marketers who are Smarter then Marc Randazza and buy his dotcom.

Marc Randazza obviously needs Internet Marketing help, so I offered it to him as I do everyone I can. It’s what I do, I would like to make money at it. Marc Randazz has his panties so wound up around his you know what, he just can’t think. So instead of defending the First Amendment and those trying to expose corruption, Marc Randazza contacts the Plaintiff to work against the Pro Se First Amendment Defendant and on the Opposite Side of First Amendment Rights. And why? Because I bought MarcRandazza.com and he was too dumb to buy it so now he wants to conspire to silence me.

Does Marc Randazza know that David Aman is alleged to be under an FBI Investigation over his connection to a man in Montana who tried to intimidate me to get me to take David Aman’s “Settlement Communication” which offered me a deal, if I commit a crime “ and just swear that people committed a crime that they did not, well then he would generously let me out of a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit, is this Legal?

See That Post Here
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/david-aman-attorney-for-plaintiff-kevin.html

And if you want to order the hearing transcript of the alleged FBI Investigation that hearing is called “Motion to Exclude Sean Boushie,” it is a matter of court record.

So what ever happens in the WAR between Crystal Cox (not a Porn Star) and Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney fighting for the rights of Porn Stars, and other Adult Entertainment First Amendment rights . . . well whatever happens, my intention on my first talk with Marc Randazza was to listen with an open mind, in the possibility of Marc Randazza representing me, and buying MarcRandazza.com, well that is just what I do, I buy the names of those who are part of stories that I come across or involve me. The domain name was available, and so I bought it. I am for hire for PR, and Search Engine Marketing, I offer that service.

Marc Randazza is a bully, and is now working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox as Marc Randazza does not believe I have a legal right to own or to have bought MarcRandazza.com, a domain name which you would think ol’ Marc Randazza would have owned long ago.

So why hasn’t Marc Randazza simply filed a WIPO complaint if Marc Randazza has the legal right to own Marc Randazza .com ? Well you see it seems like more fun and more vindictive for Marc Randazza to work on the opposite side of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights and instead set up blogger Crystal Cox with his Good Ol’ Buddies at Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in which Marc Randazza attempted to make a deal with them, financially on my behalf BEHIND MY Back and when he did not represent me.

Yes, I am under the impression that back in December, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff to make a deal on my behalf for them to change the judgement so it would not affect the Porn Industry Free Speech, and this was to be in my best interest. And I was told that at that same time Marc Randazza claimed to many in the First Amendment Bar, that he represented me, and yet Marc Randazza had not told me, the “Alleged” Client. In my Opinion, based on my personal experience I do not recommend nor trust Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza, seems to me to work on the OPPOSITE side of Free Speech in order to teach a female investigative blogger a lesson for being smarter than him.

Marc Randazza was not offered the chance to buy Marc Randazza .com, NO WAY. He will only get the name if he files a WIPO complaint, or sucks up to Plaintiff Kevin Padrick and his Attorney David Aman, if they seize the Domain Name and give it to Marc Randazza in some deal possibly made to set up, to silence blogger Crystal Cox for exposing; Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Obsidian Finance Group and their connections to Oregon Solar Credits, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Judge Randall Dunn, Blue Heron Paper Company, Dept. of Justice Pamela Griffith, Perkins Coie Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Susan Ford and Tom Stilley, Miller Nash, Bonneville Power, Lake County Oregon Commissioners, the Bend Oregon D.A. Office.

Marc Randazza claims to be a Copyright Expert, so if there is a Legal Reason that Marc Randazza should get to own Marc Randazza .com that Marc Randazza was to dumb to buy, then why doesn’t big shot Domain Name Arbitration Lawyer Marc Randazza, simply TAKE Marc Randazza .com by force instead of working in the dark, in back alleys and side deals with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, which is looking to be the biggest case of Free Speech For Bloggers that the Blogsphere has ever seen in quite this way?

And if it is NOT Legal to buy Marc Randazza .com if I am not Marc Randazza, then why in the world is it Legal for Godaddy to Sell the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com?

So Liars, Thugs and Thieves, Sue Me, Set Me Up, Do what ever makes you feel better and sleep best at night. Punish me for being Smarter than you are. Still the Truth Remains the Truth, and even if you set me up from some jail time, you are still an asshole and you were still not smart enough to register your own name as dotcom. Enjoy the Game you're Playing with the First Amendment Rights of the Entire World.

You Know Your TRUTH and I know mine.
I Let Go, Let God. It will be What it will be.

Gee I hope that Randazza Legal Group owns Randazza Legal Group .com, as I won a WIPO Case for ProskauerLawFirm.com, you know what WIPO is, right Asshole?

Stay Tuned for Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Part 2 as the Pissing Match Continues. The next Part will have emails between Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Blogger and explanations of communications from my point of view, of course. This will also include my Email to Marc Randazza rejecting him in representing me because Marc Randazza is an arrogant Ass and was disrespectful to me.

Source of Information in this Article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza

And from notes of my phone call and emails with Marc Randazza and with other Attorneys of the First Amendment Barr as well as other Internet Research

Got a Tip on Marc Randazza? I would love to know.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, Crystal@CrystalCox.com,
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com

Proskauer Rose Guilty, Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud.. IViewit is Next. 13 Trillion Dollar Scandal, USPTO, DOJ, SEC, knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud.

2012-03-07T21:56:00.000-08:00

Proskauer Rose Guilty, Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court

Obsidian Finance Group, Pacific Power, "the Black Cap Project": Oregon Solar News, Oregon Renewable Energy, Oregon Solar Credits. Obsidian Finance Group making Millions in Power Purchase Agreements, using your Tax Credits as their Asset. Selling you Back Electricity they Seem to be Getting for FREE. Gee Ya Think Obsidian Finance Group is of Public Concern? I Sure Do.

2012-03-06T20:59:00.000-08:00

"the Black Cap Project" ( PACIFICORP, DBA PACIFIC POWER )

"PacifiCorp anounces big Lakeview Solar Project

PacifiCorp announced Thursday it will develop a huge 2-megawatt solar array in Lake County, a move that will further cement the eastern Oregon region's reputation as the state's center for large-scale renewable energy projects.

PacifiCorp officials say the Black Cap Project, which will be installed a few miles from downtown Lakeview, will be the largest utility-leased solar facility in the state.

It will produce enough electricity to meet the annual needs of about 400 average PacifiCorp residential customers and will count toward the utilities obligations to produce 25 percent of its power from renewable sources by 2025 under the state's renewable portfolio standard.

Portland-based Obsidian Finance Group will develop the project and PaciCorp will own the project rights and the land under the solar panels. The utility will lease the equipment including 9,000 solar panels mounted on a motorized tracking system designed to follow the sun's path across the sky.

The project — its total cost was not released — is expected to be switched on by October.

"The construction employment is important to us, but the stronger significance is that Black Cap is building on our goal of making Lake County the 'New Energy Frontier' of the West,” said Audrey Henry, director of the Lake County Chamber of Commerce, in a press release.

The Lakeview area has been a hot spot for development of large-scale solar and biomass projects. Geothermal resources in the region have also caught the eye of developers.

Iberdrola Renewables put construction of a Lakeview biomass plant on hold last year when it was unable to secure a power purchase agreement for the project. "

Source of PacifiCorp, Obsidian Finance Group,
http://sustainablebusinessoregon.com/articles/2012/03/pacificorp-anounces-big-lakeview-solar.html

They are all in bed together and it's your Tax Dollar, your Utility Bills and your way of life they are trampling on and with no accountability or transparency.

In October, Projects Halted, Now Back on. What changed, did the Economy really change?
http://www.sustainablebusinessoregon.com/articles/2011/10/construction-halted-on-lakeview.html

Air Quality Concerns, Land Owners Rights Violated, and Yet Obsidian Finance Group and the HUGE Utility Companies win because they have more MONEY, more ATTORNEYS and your TAX Dollars to Work with. Click Here for Concerned Citizens of Lake County, though Judge Herndez said Blogger Crystal Cox was the Only one with Issue with Obsidian Finance Group.

Tonkon Torp Law Firm was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy whereby Kevin Padrick was the Trustee, Appointed by the DOJ, but really by Judge Randall Dunn as in the Court Audio, Click Here.

Tonkon Torp was named in the Objection to Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy, and knew of issues within the Bankruptcy and yet continues to side with Obsidian Finance Group, Click Here for that Objection to the Fees.

Obsidian Finance Group's "Fees" were disputed yet again by Homestreet Bank out of Washington State, Click Here for that Legal Proceeding.

As you see from the many internal emails in my 3 years of Investigating the Summit Bankruptcy, David Peterson of Tonkon Torp was involved in some emails, as I remember it. And so Tonkon Torp is connected to the Department of Defense, to Lobbying for PacifiCorp and to the Solar Industry Bigtime. They all are in bed together and want to Silence Me, the Blogger connecting them all. Click Here for Dept. of Defense David Peterson Article. ~ Federal Lands, State Tax Credits, Public Utilities and a Federal Judge Ruled that Obsidian Finance Group was not of Public Concern? Folks dig deep it is YOUR MONEY.

Groups That Have Retained Tonkon Torp: Click Here for Tonkon Torp "Lobied For" PacifiCorp via Berkshire Hathaway. (Electric Utilities)

More Berkshire Hathaway, PacifiCorp Lobby Research Links
http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000021757&year=2011
2 Million Lobby for Electric Utilities in 2011 ~ WOW
6 Million BNSF Railway ~ WOW

Tonkon Torp, Berkshire Hathaway, PacifiCorp 2010
http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/firmsum.php?id=D000029488&year=2010

Don't Forget that Ewan Rose, formerly of Obsidian Finance Group and involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal and David Brown, Co-Owner of Obsidian Finance Group are now registered Lobbyists. And we also have Doherty of Miller Nash Lobbying for Obsidian Finance Group.

PacifiCorp - Obsidian Finance Group "the Black Cap Project"
http://www.heraldandnews.com/news/oregon/article_7bef5ea0-63ea-11e1-96bd-001871e3ce6c.html
3 Million Per Megawatt. WOW. And see Poor Ol' Liars Obsidian Finance Group claimed that Blogger Crystal Cox lost them Millions during this time period, more Lies from Obsidian Finance Group.

Iberdrola Renewables Research Links
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/01/iberdrola_renewables_laying_of.html

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/02/post_70.html

The whole Obsidian V. Cox war, Represented by Tonkon Torp who lobbies for PacifiCorp, is about Tax Credits, hiding information regarding the actions of Obsidian Finance Group to protect HUGE utility deals that I believe started with connections around the Summit Bankruptcy. During that Time PV Powered was going bankruptcy and bought by Advanced Energy Industries based in Colorado yet their DBA is of Delaware. I believe this to have something to do with Kevin Padrick as well, and secret deals surrounding the Summit Bankruptcy. Have a Tip? eMail me at WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com or SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com or CrystalCoxBlogger

I believe there was Jury tampering and deals made in attempt to silence an investigative blogger, me, in order to keep Obsidian Finance Group in the Billions and keep those jobs flowing and those tax dollars creating more money for big Portland Oregon Corporations and Law Firms, at the expense of the Public and of the Bankruptcy Victims of Kevin Padrick, this is what I believe from my years of research. Investigatigate Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, Investigate Tonkon Torp in connection to the Summit Bankruptcy and dig deep for the Truth that "News" like Jeff Manning of the Oregonian, David Carr of the New York Times, and Kashmir Hill of Forbes don't have the balls to tell you NOR the Brains to make the connections.

Oh and Most Certainly Miller Nash Connections are at Play here, and I bet pretty shady ones at that, Have a Tip? More on that later and possibly Eugene Oregon Connections and MAYBE even Judge Marco Hernandez. Look Deep Folks, I am the Messenger and NOT the Messenger, research this stuff and find the Story... ya know Like a Real "Journalist".

Tax Exemptions, Solar Credits, Power Deals, and more.. all involving you, the PUBLIC. Pay Attention, they are getting richer off of something that seems free to them and paid for by YOU, the PUBLIC.

Kevin Padrick Research Links

http://www.objectiontofees.com/
http://www.kevinpadrick.com/

If any links are broken on this page or you want court filings, documents, videos, information.. Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Keywords of Research
Lakeview Solar Project, Black Cap Project, Obsidian Finance Group, Renewable Energy Projects,Oregon Biomass Project, Iberdrola Renewables, Advanced Energy Industries, Renewable Energy Developers, Power Purchase Agreement, Whittington Consulting, Patricia Whittington, PV Powered, , PACIFICORP, DBA PACIFIC POWER

Protect Your Voice - Stand For Equal Rights of Citizen Journalists. Bloggers are Bringing you MORE of the Real Story. Bloggers SHOULD have Equal Rights as Journalists Due when Bloggers are Doing the Same Things. Bloggers Rights. Freedom of Speech, Equality for ALL. Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity.

2012-02-23T21:13:00.000-08:00

"Jason Stverak, president of the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, recently wrote a Washington Examiner op-ed regarding the free speech threats which bloggers and other citizen journalists increasingly face.

From the piece:

This past December, federal judge Marco Hernandez of Oregon issued a ruling in the libel trial of Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox that has dangerous First Amendment implications.
Hernandez ruled that blogger Crystal Cox was not entitled to the same protection under media shield laws that other members of the press enjoy. This ruling made it easy for a jury to find her guilty of libel. That result threatens the First Amendment rights of all citizen-journalists.
With the Internet increasingly serving as the dominant source of information, a national debate has been taking place asking the question, who is a journalist? Legal scholars, journalism academics and First Amendment advocates all have their opinions and as expected, there is little agreement.
But why is this issue so complicated? Bloggers, like all citizens of the United States, have First Amendment rights. Has the definition of a journalist changed? Or has perception and therefore legal definition simply not adjusted to modern technology?
According to Professor Kyu Ho Youm of the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication, Judge Hernandez “ruled correctly” in the Cox case. But he also acknowledges that the ruling was based on his “textual interpretation” and that “pre-Internet law needs updating.”
Youm offers a wake-up call to state legislators. Media shield laws must be revised to make clear that bloggers and all citizen-journalists deserve the same protection as the city hall beat-writer at the local newspaper.
This is especially important, as technology and new economic realities have forced newspapers all over the country to cut staff drastically and in many cases, close up shop. The public now relies on citizen-journalists to perform an invaluable service to our democracy — serving as government watchdogs.
Read more.
Attribution:
First Amendment protects bloggers, too
Jason Stverak
February 18, 2012
The Washington Examiner
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2012/02/first-amendment-protects-bloggers-too/280586"

Source of Post and Where to Sign Petition
http://www.estateofdenial.com/2012/02/23/help-protect-your-voice-strengthen-citizen-journalists-blogger-rights/

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Says that Courtney Sherwood is Full Of Shit and FACT Checked NOTHING on her blather about Whistle Blower Blogger Crystal L. Cox Regarding Obsidian Finance Group V. Pro Se Blogger Crystal Cox. Got a Courtney Sherwood Tip?

2012-02-13T18:43:00.001-08:00

Courtney Sherwood of Blogs.Lawyer.com ( a Blogger) Defames me by calling me a "Lying Blogger" in the apparent name of defending an alleged "Truth" by an Oregon Financial Company, and their Main Stream Media cronies such as Jeff Manning of the Oregonian and David Carr of the New York Times.

Courtney Sherwood seems to have NOT done her homework, not checked those "facts" and wrote a defaming article regarding what she apparently believes is true, yet is most certainly "not backed by evidence".

Courtney Sherwood says "Plenty of journalists have blogs these days, but is everyone who blogs a journalist? Not if they fail to check their facts, post defamatory statements not backed by evidence, and have no connections to any news outlets, an Oregon jury recently ruled."

If Courtney Sherwood had done any research, Courtney Sherwood would know that I gave the court over 547 documents of proof of that ONE Blog Post. Courtney Sherwood "would" not call my a Lying Blogger.

Courtney Sherwood would know that I linked to documents, and spent 3 years talking to insiders, reading insider emails that included attorneys from all sides and the department of justice, I read depositions, watched videos of Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group speaking to his clients that he turned on to work for the creditors. I read lawsuits involved in the bankruptcy and interviewed those involved, and I certainly had done years of "fact checking" and it was most CERTAINLY "backed by evidence".

Evidence, that to this day that the Oregon Attorney General, Department of Justice, FBI and anyone who actually pays attention to the US bankruptcy courts will NOT investigate as documented facts.

And ignorant people such as Courtney Sherwood of Lawyers.com blogs, do not investigate, do not fact check or actually read the documents or really have a clue what they are blathering about, spreading as the "story" and somehow they feel justified in attacking me, lying about me, and having done no real "fact checking" of their own on the story to determine the truth of the chosen headline claiming that I am the "Lying Blogger".

Courtney Sherwood simply regurgitates what the main stream media is yammering and in defense of corporate corruption, greed, fraud on the courts and at the same time stomping on the rights of the victims whom I give voice to in telling this story.

Courtney Sherwood has not read every document of Obsidian V. Cox, nor has Courtney Sherwood read all the documents involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Yet Courtney Sherwood labels me as the "Lying Blogger" .

Courtney Sherwood calls me the Lying Blogger, and claims I hope for a second chance. Which is pure BULLSHIT. I am not asking for a second chance, the Motion for a New Trial is to help loose lipped, lying, full of shit bloggers LIKE Courtney Sherwood, to minimize their risk.

It is to change how the case reads, goes down in history as "matter of law" and is for people, bloggers such as Courtney Sherwood, to continue doing what they do. I could go straight to appeal or just eat the Judgement, not like I have $2.5 million or will EVER pay it. I chose to accept the challenge of a new trial and all the work it will take to prepare, and to go to court and defend myself again, in order to change the "matter of law" and "case precedence" that this case sets for bloggers, citizen journalists, whistle blowers in America and essentially around the world

The motion for a new Trial is to (not "Chill Speech") so that Bloggers like Courtney Sherwood can trash talk and flat out lie about Bloggers such as Crystal Cox and not lose their homes, their ability to support their family, their way of life. And to protect bloggers such as Courtney Sherwood for when they make dumb ass moves such as this article in which Courtney Sherwood lies about me in and "they" will NOT have to face a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement. Me agreeing to a motion for a new trial was for the greater good, not for me.

As, if I get a new trial I have to represent myself and may lose again, after all it is the same judge and court. The BONUS, the POINT, is to change the way it goes down in law so that this case does not silence Bloggers, Whistle Blowers, Citizen Journalists and those Exposing Corruption such as I do.

Courtney Sherwood Says "Padrick was originally hired as a consultant to Summit Accommodators" Does Courtney Sherwood have a clue what she is talking about, if hired by Summit then isn't "Padrick" an insider and does this not break the bankruptcy laws to then be a "Trustee"?

Courtney Sherwood Says "He subsequently accused Summit officials of using client money to fund a Ponzi-like scheme that led to millions of dollars in losses to investors."

Again not really based in the whole truth. He "accused", so Courtney Sherwood seems to be saying it is ok that Kevin Padrick accused Summit of a "Ponzi" without proving it, without "fact checking" and "not backed by evidence"?

See, if Courtney Sherwood had done her legal homework, Courtney Sherwood would know that there really was no Ponzi, and if Courtney Sherwood had read the information regarding the Umpqua Bank Lawsuit, Courtney Sherwood would know that Kevin Padrick was the only one creating the "alternate reality" that there was a Ponzi, and thereby set up his own clients "Summit" to be indicted. And taking all eyes off Kevin Padrick and his Cronies as they raked in Millions of Dollars on top of Millions for 3 years and counting, Obsidian Finance, I believe is still making money to this DAY, from the Summit Bankruptcy.

Courtney Sherwood Says  "“I believe I did a better job then (sic) a lawyer could have for this first step,” she wrote in December to Seattle Weekly, after a jury awarded $1 million to Obsidian and $1.5 million to Padrick. But court records suggest that Cox has since changed her stance about legal representation."
Again NOT TRUE. I did not "change my stance".   How do court records "suggest" this? Only when you don't do your homework and make up an "alternate reality". As the Truth is, court records show a Motion for a New Trial assisted by Lawyers, yes, however I am pro se in the "New Trial Option" and would only have a Lawyer represent me fully in the case of an appeal. Also I did not approach any of these lawyers, they contacted me, as this case affects ALL bloggers and I have a social responsibility to others, like me, who expose corruption, speak out about injustice, and BLOW the Proverbial Whistle.

I am in NO WAY changing my "stance". I am still pro se in this Motion for a New Trial, in the regard that if there is a New Trial, I have to represent myself, the New Trial Motion is for other bloggers more then me, for me.

I could go straight to appeal. Or Do Nothing. I do believe I did a very good job, and law clerks over the last year have complimented me on the job I have done. Just because ONE Judge did not base his "Opinion" in the Retraction Laws, Shield Laws, Anti-Slapp Laws and in the true merits of this case does not mean that I did not do a good job or am in any way changing my "stance" !!!

And also in representing myself, there was no one to tell me to sit down and shut up as Lawyers often do. This way I exposed more on the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal in the Documents of the Case Obsidian V. Cox, over the last year and I questioned Obsidian Finance Group under Oath and further proved their guilt, as far as I see it.

Courtney Sherwood Says "Judge Marco A. Hernandez will rule on whether to give Cox a second chance." Again, It not about giving me a Second Chance, if you read ALL the documents you see that I was discriminated against, my proof was thrown out, I was railroaded in a sense and the laws that should have applied to me did not, the Court messed this up, NOT ME. It is more about the right laws applying and not a second chance, for even if I lose AGAIN, at least this new way that I agreed to will make it so bloggers like Courtney Sherwood are able to keep telling it like they see it and be protected. THAT is the POINT, to Protect OTHER bloggers and citizen journalists.

I had many ways out of this, many months ago and none the best for the victims involved nor for the "other" bloggers out there that expose corruption. Or in the case of Courtney Sherwood, bloggers who yammer un-investigated BULLSHIT, and name calls with NO PROOF or Documents of Fact.

My blogs post documents, videos, emails, deposition and PROOF. Courtney Sherwood just mirrors others people's perspective and calls it good.

Courtney Sherwood Says "She criticized Padrick for going after the owners of Summit Accommodators when he became bankruptcy trustee. But that was likely Padrick’s legal obligation."   "Likely", really Courtney Sherwood, is that the word your going with? How lame is that ? His Likely legal obligation has far more details and ramifications than this implies. I believe Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, in his role as a Trustee in a $40 Million Bankruptcy had no legal, ethical right to be the Trustee of the Summit Bankruptcy and I believe Kevin Padrick conspired with Judge Randall Dunn, Tonkon Torp Law Firm, David Aman and Leon Simson of Tonkon Torp, Miller Nash, Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank,Tom Stilley, Susan Ford, Perkins Coie,Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice, Patricia Whittington and the Cascade Medical Center, and many others in the scooping up of millions of dollars of victims money and answering to no authority and with NO Transparency or Accountability.

Courtney Sherwood Says "The problem is, she presented no proof that her statements were true, even in court." This is so full of shit Courtney Sherwood, do you have the ability to read or think for yourself what so ever? I presented 800 pages in my Trial Documents, and over 547 pages of proof of the SOURCE of this ONE Blog Post, and yes even in court and I was shut down at every turn.

I presented proof of the source of this post over and over during the last year and was denied due process within the laws of the United State of America, and Denied Constitutional Rights, at every turn. All to protect Elite Law Firms of Portland Oregon, Huge Timber Investment Companies and Solar Companies such as Obsidian Finance Group and in the name of trampling victims in multiple states with no accountability of transparency what so every.

Oh and quoting David Carr, again FULL OF SHIT, did you investigate his lying blather or his motives?
David Carr interviewed me and did not post my side. David Carr jumped on the bandwagon of accusing me of Extortion which is a Crime, knowing full well that I explained to him what that email was about, which was an offer to settle and was AFTER the Lawsuit was filed. David Carr will be sued next for Defamation and he did so "Knowingly" and will be unable to use the actual malice defense, as I told him my side.

So jump on the band wagon of the New York Times and kick the "Lying Blogger" while she appears to be down and never notice that I jumped into a fight that was NOT MINE to give victims a voices with my POWERFUL search engine placement skills, all in the name of "Liberty and Justice for All", Obeying the Law, Holding Up the Constitutional Rights of the Victims and on a STORY that was not involving me what so ever. I gave the victims voice to make this world a better place by fighting for what is right.

Wake UP Courtney Sherwood and think for yourself.

Here is a Link to that Blather of Courtney Sherwood and the Courtney Sherwood article I am discussing.
http://blogs.lawyers.com/2012/02/lying-blogger-wants-new-trial/?WT.mc_id=TwitterAds_ProTweets12Q1

Posted Here by the "Infamous" "Lying Blogger"
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Research Links

http://www.kevinpadrick.com/

http://www.obsidianvcox.com/

http://www.objectiontofees.com/

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/107169114/Obsidian-V-Cox---Explanation-of-My-Exhibits---Trial-Memorandum-I-was-Denied-Use-Of

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/107076940/Obsidian-V-Cox---Trial-Documents-Blogger-Crystal-Cox-Was-Denied-into-Court

Also Check out the iViewit Technologies case involving top law firms, media companies and the top courts in the US over a 13 Trillion Dollar Stolen Technology over a Decade and Counting.

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://iviewit.tv/

Jeff Manning Oregonian Searching Jeff Manning Oregonian - Got a Tip on Asshole, Liar, Thug and Thief Jeff Manning of the Oregonian. The Oregonian Sucks, Jeff Manning is an Oregonian Advanced Publications, MASSIVE Liability. Jeff Manning Oregon Reporter. Jeff Manning Oregonian. Jeff Manning Advanced Publications.

2012-02-11T22:30:00.001-08:00

Jeff Manning Oregonian - Jeff Manning of the Oregonian

Jeff Manning Oregonian Searching Jeff Manning Oregonian - Got a Tip on Asshole, Liar, Thug and Thief Jeff Manning of the Oregonian. Email your Jeff Manning of the Oregonian tip to Crystal@CrystalCox.com, forever Eye on prejudice, discriminating asshole, thug, liar, Jeff Manning of the Oregonian.

The Oregonian Sucks, Jeff Manning is an Oregonian Advanced Publications, MASSIVE Liability. Jeff Manning Oregonian Searching Jeff Manning Oregonian searching from his iPhone today, oh so Tricky..

Jeff Manning Oregonian Searching Jeff Manning Oregonian, is believed to have illegally accessed phone numbers in my bank accounts and one day soon Jeff Manning of the Oregonian will be sued and most likely Jeff Manning of the Oregonian will be indicted.

Many have issue with the "Reporting Tactics" of Jeff Manning of the Oregonian, and I WILL Expose every tactic, trick and dirty deal of Jeff Manning of the Oregonian.

Jeff Manning of the Oregonian, Advanced Publications lied to me, tricked me, deceived me, accused me of Criminal Activity, took the side of thug and liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance as the word of God, and did not consider my side nor investigate the TRUTH. Even though Jeff Manning of the Oregonian begged me for an interview.

Jeff Manning of the Oregonian got a heartfelt, true interview from me and LIED. Jeff Manning of the Oregonian covered up for Kevin Padrick during the Summit Bankruptcy and continues to do so without investigating the documents, videos, insider emails and proof. Jeff Manning of the Oregonian can't stand whistle blower Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung for some reason and therefore has no interest in ANY facts that affect Oregon Tax Payers and the public at large over the dirty dealings of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

Jeff Manning of the Oregonian is a Dick Head at best, a THUG indeed, a Flat Out Liar and if Jeff Manning of the Oregonian accessed my bank account, I will see Jeff Manning of the Oregonian in prison and Advanced Publications will be sued big time.

Jeff Manning Oregonian, the Oregonian, Jeff Manning, Jeff Manning Oregonian, the Oregonian, Jeff Manning, Jeff Manning Oregonian, the Oregonian, Jeff Manning, Jeff Manning Oregonian, the Oregonian, Jeff Manning, Jeff Manning Oregonian, the Oregonian, Jeff Manning

Got a Tip regarding DICKHEAD Jeff Manning of the Oregonian? Email your Jeff Manning of the Oregonian Tip to me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Eric Fleischman San Francisco - Eric Fleischman Googled Daily, My Eric Fleischman comments found. Eric Fleischman San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco researching blogger Crystal Cox

2012-02-09T16:36:00.000-08:00

Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco are seemingly paid consultants to research Crystal Cox Blog. Who is paying Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco to read my blogs? What is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco looking for? Are Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco looking to find "dirt" on me?

Or are Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco looking for the real "bad guys". Or is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco simply gathering research for David Aman or Tonkon Torp Law Firm?

Is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco paid by Jeff Manning of the Oregonian who seems to have illegally accessed my bank account and called my client?

Is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco paid by Kashmir Hill of Forbes or David Carr of the New York Times to research blogger Crystal Cox?

What is Is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco really up to? And does Is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco not simply email Crystal Cox Blogger and ask her what she is up to? Is that to simple for Is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and Ian Duggan of San Francisco?

Have a Tip on Is Eric Fleischman of San Francisco and / or Ian Duggan of San Francisco ?

So is Kashmir Hill of Forbes , the Special Business that Kevin Padrick is said to have recently went to Washington DC for? Or did Kevin Padrick go to Washington DC to talk with a Political Crony to set me Up? Is Kashmir Hill of Forbes the Washington D.C. Psinet Investigator that is scouring my every site. Does Washington D.C. Psinet Investigator know that I will soon be suing Kashmir Hill and Forbes for her knowingly posting fraudulent information regarding an email accusing me of a crime, an email which was really a Settlement Communication between two attorneys, as I am Pro Se and it was sent AFTER the lawsuit was filed. Kashmir Hill of Forbes should have called both sides as they love to say, Kashmir Hill of Forbes should have read into the information of those who sued Kevin Padrick and have issue with him and Obsidian Finance Group, BEFORE she put Forbes at such massive liability in accusing me of a crime.

Warner Bros., Motion Pictures Association and Motion Picture Lobbyists have the Nerve to go after Kim Dotcom, MegaUpload when Warner Bros. has STOLEN the iViewit Technology and in imaging and used it for over a Decade.

2012-02-01T15:31:00.000-08:00

STOP protecting Warner Bros., Motion Pictures Association and Motion Picture Lobbyists and ruining the lives of the little guy who is creating the technology and outsmarting them.

Demand that Warner Bros., Motion Pictures Association and Motion Picture Lobbyists are not above the law that they get Congressman and Senators to enforce on their behalf for their own personal motives and greed.

I read in the USA Today paper version, that the Motion Picture Lobbyists, Warner Brothers and the Motion Pictures Association of America are the ones who complained that Kim Dotcom was basically stealing their revenue, thing is Warner Bros. has been stealing ALL video they us in ALL imaging from the technology of iviewit for over a decade. Even in the bold face of signed non-compete agreements over a decade ago.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf

Why does the DOJ, SEC, the USPTO, the Supreme Court, ALL ignore the rights of the iViewit Inventors? And protect big corpporations such as the Motion Picture Lobbyists, Warner Brothers and the Motion Pictures Association of America?

Links to the MegaUpload Story

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/story/2012-01-30/megaupload-data/52884574/1

http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/online-intellectual-property/megaupload-website-has-megaproblems/

Motion Pictures Association of America ,Jack Valenti,
http://iviewit.tv/senatecultbill.htm

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

Open Letter to Warner Bros. Shareholders regarding massive fraud, collusion and cover ups that one day shareholder will pay the bill for.
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2011/03/twx-open-letter-to-time-warner-warner.html

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/

SEC Complaint Naming Warner Bros
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

iViewit RICO Complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf

Yes the MegaUpload arrest was political motivated, and yet another protection of Warner Bros. and the Elite corporation and tech companies.

More Links to the iViewit Story, and Warner Bros. has the Nerve to Complain and Lobbyists get the SEC, FBI, DOJ to act on the complaint when for over a decade Warner Bros. Has been using the iViewit Technology for Free

http://www.federalricolawsuit.com/search/label/Foley%20and%20Lardner

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2007%2008%20RUBENSTEIN%20KRANE%20JOAO%20MOTION%20FINAL%20BOOKMARKED.pdf

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=andrew-cuomo

Federal Rico Complaint - IViewit, Proskauer Rose, Foley Lardner, The Florida Bar, Supreme Court of New York and More Protected by Judicial System, Demand to Know Why?

2012-01-28T19:56:00.001-08:00

Hey Washington D.C., Psinet (38.105.71.72) - I See you Investigating my Every Blog Post, Every Person, Every Document, Every Story - are you going to Do Something about the mass amount of proof and documents that Expose Corruption in the U.S. Courts, Over the Iviewit Technology Case and in the Bankruptcy Courts. I Sure Hope that is Why your Investigating all my Blogs so deeply.

Click Below for Rico Complaint Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley and Lardner, The Florida Supreme Court, Florida Bar, New York Courts, Intel Corp., Lockheed Martin, Silicon Graphics, Real 3D Inc., Wildman Harrold Allen and Dixen, Eric Chen, Digital Interactive Streams Inc., Kenneth Rubenstein Proskauer Rose, Uview.com, and tons more.. Filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, Iviewit Technologies.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf