Reel World Adventures

My 101 Thing in 1001 Days

2013-09-03T01:44:00.000-04:00

Hi internet friends!

It has been a while since I last posted and a lot has changed. With a new month here I wanted to kick off with a little something different. I recently stumbled upon the Day Zero Project and with many things changing in my personal life I wanted to make my own 101 list to complete in 1001 days (roughly 2.75 yrs). I will keep this post updated as challenges are in progress and completed, as well as post pictures about some of the challenges. If you feel inspired to start your own Day Zero Project good luck and keep me posted on your progress :)

Start Date: September 3, 2013

End Date: May 31, 2016

Personal Development

1. Clean basement/bedroom at parents place and donate items no longer need

2. Encourage someone to create their own 101 in 1001

3. Reorganize 101 List to Complete in 1001 Days

4. Complete “Maximize Brand You” course at work (start date: Sept 19, 2013)

5. Read unread books on bookshelf

6. Complete 7 goals in a week (0/7)

7. Grow something from a seed

8. Perform 5 random acts of kindness (0/5)

9. Take an archery class

10. Start writing for blog again

11. Have a penguin encounter

Healthy Living

12. Stop biting my fingernails

13. Go for a bike ride at least once a month

14. Go to dermatologist

15. Find out blood type

Complete C25K
Complete a 'Walk To Mordor' challenge
Complete a 200 Sit-ups Challenge
lose weight – personal goal 15-20 lbs
Complete a 100 Pushups Challenge
Eat three (3) things I’ve never tried before (0/3)
Get a pedicure
Get a massage
Cook at home every night for one month (0/31)
Don't eat fast food for a month (including Starbucks/Dunkin Donuts) (0/31)

Don't eat out for a month (0/31)
Don't eat sweets for a month (0/31)

Family, Friends and Love

Adopt a rescue pet
Volunteer at an animal shelter &/or zoo
Research my family tree
Help a friend move
Have a romantic weekend away
Take a romantic walk on the beach

Enjoy a romantic dinner
Call (5) friends I haven’t talked to in a while (0/5)

Being Creative

36. When possible, blog & photograph the tasks I complete (started Sept 3, 2013)

37. Blog daily for 30 consecutive days (0/30)

38. Leave an inspirational note inside a book for someone to find

39. Perform a Chinese fire drill

40. Participate in BookCrossing

41. Make a list of the 100 best experiences of my life

42. Write a 101 list of things I have already completed

Make a list of the books I have read (start date Sept 10, 2013)
Make a list of 50 places I would like to visit in my lifetime (start date Sept 10, 2013)
Make a list of my 50 favorite movies (start date Sept 10, 2013)
Make a list of 100 songs that I love
Finish novel and submit it for publication
Take a photo a day for one year (0/365)
Take a photo of the same place very month for one year, then turn it into a calendar for the next year (1/12: start date Sept 1, 2013)
Create a photo album from Cross Country Road Trip
Create a family photo album
Organize photo collection

Create/Organize cookbook of family recipies

Experiences and Travel

Visit a Disney theme park during a holiday season
Ride in a horse drawn carriage
Visit Museum of Moving Pictures
Visit Titanic Museum
Travel across the Brooklyn Bridge
Visit Atlantic City Boardwalk
Go pumpkin and apple picking in the fall
Go on vacation with a group of friends
Take a vacation to a tropical destination
Make (realistic) plan for trip to a foreign country
Go backpacking
Practice derby w/ (5) teams from different states (0/5)
Go to a music festival
Go kayaking or white water rafting
Watch the sunset on a beach
Visit Gettysburg National Military Park
Witness an electrical storm in tornado alley

Visit New Orleans
Visit Las Vegas
Attend 10 different ethnic festivals (0/10)
Attend The Big E
Attend King Richard's Faire

Home

Organize home office
Decorate home for each holiday

Financial

Save 1 months’ salary
Save 3 months’ salary (0/3)
Save 6 months’ salary (0/6)
Go 1 week without buying anything (0/7)
Go 1 month without buying coffee and instead put money into a trip fund when tempted to buy a cup. (0/31)
Create monthly budget
Save $5 for every item completed to spend at the end of the 1001 days
Save my change during the duration of this challenge and cash in my change jar to use for an overseas trip

Get a new Mac
Start an emergency fund
Save $500 in an emergency fund

Food and Entertainment

Read comic collection
Complete 5 unfinished video games currently in my gaming library (0/5)

Take a formal cooking class
Cook an Indian meal from scratch
Learn to make Steak Diane without setting anything on fire
Go to the Ben & Jerry's factor
Drink only water for 1 week (0/7)
Watch all of IMDB'S Top 250 Movies (0/250)
Watch a movie at a drive-in
Go see a musical
Go on a zipline
Make bubble tea
Go out to a fancy restaurant for dinner

In Progress

~~Completed~~

Prometheus -- REVIEW

2012-06-26T13:25:00.001-04:00

There has been a lot of debate as to whether or not Prometheus is a prequel to the Aliens trilogy (I personally do not consider the 4th film as part of the series). The film was not advertised as a prequel but from the first glimpse of the giant alien in the chair which is an iconic image from the 1979 film there was no question in my mind. Prometheus was going to be a story from a time predating Ripley and hopefully one that would give us some back story as to where the aliens came from.

For anyone that still has not seen the film I do not want to spoil too much, but I will say that I was barely satisfied with the amount of information given during the 2 hr film. The opening sequence alone left more open to debate than it answered, and I'm still unsure the point was for the mysterious man on the edge of a waterfall. There was no indication as to what year we were being told about or where it was taking place, and then it cut to 2089 where the story of Prometheus truly begins. I mean it was a true ‘WTF’ moment.

From beginning to end the film tries to push you along and give you some answers but there are themes and elements within the film that might leave an odd taste in your mouth as you walk out of the theater. I personally was excited that the evolution of the alien was finally explained, however there was almost no explanation as to where any of the other characters came from and the almost desperate push for answers by Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace – Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) left me unimpressed. In the end I found that the acting of almost unrecognizable actors in Prometheus far surpassed all other aspects of the film. The cast was strong and carried the weight of the film far better than the story, and my favorite was the android David portrayed by Michael Fassbender (Inglorious Basterds and A Dangerous Method) whose acting skills appeared to surpass those of Charlize Theron (Snow White & the Huntsman and Monster)who was just there. The special effects were of course impressive even if they left you scratching your hear as to what you just saw, but ultimately the “big reveal” was not as big as I would have liked. I would have preferred to have gotten a few more answers out of the film rather than a new list of questions that were left unanswered.

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying that you shouldn't see Prometheus, I'm just advising that one should lower their expectations as the film may not quite satisfy your needs. But don't worry, there is talk that this is not a stand-alone prequel, but in fact part of a trilogy of its own that would eventually give us the answers we are hoping for.

Over all I give Prometheus a 3 out of 5.

**Review written for PacMan & the Hot One -- http://pacmanandthehotone.blogspot.com/2012/06/prometheus-2012-film-review.html. Check out the link to read other reviews.**

Dark Knight Rises - New Trailer

2012-06-19T20:20:00.000-04:00

When it comes to summer block busters there's always one film that stands out. Dark Knight Rises is that film for me. Granted I have some personal attachment to the project as I was lucky enough to get to be an extra in a scene, so my excitement to see the final product is heightened even more.

I remember driving out to Pittsburg last August for a full day on the set of DKR. It was hot and humid with scattered rain in the early morning that broke up rehearsals, but watching the men and women working on set with all of the excitement of the unknown that we would be witnessing was beyond belief. And now that the release of the film is approaching I'm desperately trying not to ready spoilers or watch clips that could potentially give away any hints to the plot, but this particular trailer leaves me feeling like a kid in a candy shop with the anticipation I'm feeling for the release of Dark Knight. So enjoy watching the below clip.

Beastly -- REVIEW

2012-06-04T23:14:00.000-04:00

There is something fun about film adaptations to pieces of literature. Granted there are some books that should NEVER be messed with, but there are others that have potential of being something... well... interesting. Beastly is a fun book for what it is, and I feel that Young Adult lit is kind of one of those "touchy" areas because kids and teens read at different levels and have such a wide variety of interests that it quickly becomes one of those "agree to disagree" zones. Alex Flinn's YA novel is an interesting modern twist to the classic 'Beauty and the Beast' tale. The concept is fun and I like that it's trying to get new generations into the "classic fairy tales", however being a slightly older YA reader I did hope the film adaptation would help mature the story just enough that slightly older audiences would be able to enjoy the story as well. The film, however, was a monster all of its own.

Beastly ultimately feels like it is a film meant for audiences 12 and under. Although I loved that the art director decided to take the beast in a different direction than the traditional furry animal, I found that the tattoos and scars were a fun concept. Granted I could not take my eyes off the words that were tattooed on Alex Pettyfer's in place of his eyebrows (Embrace Suck) and found it extremely distracting. Aside from the unusual take on what makes a beast I found little else to be enjoyable about the film. I'm not saying that I don't enjoy watching "pretty people" in movies, however my sympathy for the main character was not developed well enough for me to really care what happened to him over the course of the film. I also think that transition from page to screen is difficult when you have "older" actors playing younger characters and it is made even worse when the film character is older than the novel character and yet the behaviors are exactly the same. I almost wish they would have just told the story of a 16 year old boy suffering rather than a kid who shouldn't even be in high school because the believability of the actions just falls apart. It is a problem I also found with Alex Pettyfer's role as John in I Am Number Four.

The best part of Beastly is watching Neil Patrick Harris play a blind guy. Granted the role does not give him a whole lot to work with, but he definitely helps push the story alone. The other character I wish they had used more was Mary-Kate Olsen's Kendra. Although she has been changed slightly from the book, I found her to be the most believable of all the characters. I wanted her to be a larger influence into the change that Kyle experiences and was saddened that that element of the book was lost. I also wish the "magic mirror" was included and possibly could have changed the whole feel to the story. I know that is getting back to the Disney tale and making it too "kiddie", but sometimes I just hope... hope that the things that work in books and have been laid out so well that they just translate over. I know it is not likely to happen but I can keep dreaming. I mean it is all fantasy after all.

Over all I give Beastly a 1 out of 5 and the one piece of advice I'd like to throw out into the cyber world...(hoping to be heard - but knowing I wont ) Alex Pettyfer BEWARE of the YA curse. If you get type casted to only play roles based on childrens lit your reputation as an actor might become limited.

Rain: A Tribute to the Beatles -- Broadway Review

2012-05-16T20:45:00.000-04:00

Rain: A Tribute to the Beatles is an amazing show with great music that is fun for kids of all ages. This is not your traditional Broadway show, but it is definitely something worth taking note of. The four musicians who play the band and exceptionally talented and do an amazing job of keeping the audience entertained for a two hour show. Although there is not "real story", the show follows the Beatles and their music from their invasion of the US thru to the 70s. If you are a fan of the Beatles, or have children who have never heard the Beatles this is a great introduction to the band. Rain is an "interactive" concert like show where you are encouraged to sing along with the songs, and the band even gets the audience up on their feet several times throughout the show. It is one of those shows where no matter where you're from or how old/young you are you will definitely enjoy the experience. If you are in NY or in one of the cities where the tour is going I would recommend checking out the show. It s a different way of spending a night out on the town, but every bit just as fun.

Favorite Forgotten Films by Peter Jackson

2012-05-01T20:56:00.000-04:00

Peter Jackson is a unique filmmaker who is primarily known for his later films, but it is his earlier films that I find to be some of his better flicks.

#3: 1992 brought about the release of Dead Alive, a campie horror comedy film that I have always considered one of my favorite films.

#2: In 1989 a very disturbing film was released call Meet the Feebles. This flick was the second feature length film Jackson directed. Although it is not a widely known film it is one that you will never forget once you see it.

#1: The Frighteners hit theaters in 1996 and terrified me. 15 years later and I can still remember the movie poster of the of the monster pushing its way through a white canvas. It was not just the poster that scared me as a 10 yr old horror fan, but the idea that when it was our time to die that we might have a number etched into our forehead. Personally I find this to be the best picture he made.

I feel that these early films are far too often forgotten and they shouldn't be. If you haven't seen these films I recommend checking them out.

Thor -- REVIEW

2012-04-24T23:28:00.000-04:00

Most people would recognize Kenneth Branagh as one of top Shakespearean actors or more recently for his role as Professor Lockhart. His is a brilliant actor in just about everything he does (even though sometimes over acted), and although this is not his first stab at directing it is his first take at a film of such "epic" proportions. I will however be completely honest with you, if you attempt to watch see Thor in 3D you are wasting your time. There is NOTHING 3D about this film. It was NOT shot in 3D -- in fact it was shot in 2D and then converted. Although the "3D" does not appear as painful as that of Clash of the Titans (only meaning I didn't have a splitting headache by the end of the film) I was thoroughly irritated that I wasted my money when there was no 3D involved.

Aside from that massive fail, Thor was entertaining. Just like all of Branagh's Shakes films, Thor is very pretty to look at. The CGI is well done and Asgard is very much a world fit for the comics. It almost felt like Lord of the Rings had stepped into the world of Heros and traveled back in time only to travel back to present day etc, while also bringing along a few of the monsters from the Buffy/Angel series. (Sadly I feel like I'm now waiting for the punch line of a "walks into the bar" joke) There is however one slight downside to this film...

If you have seen any of the Shakes films Branagh directed/acted in, I'm sure that you will start to notice little things about Thor... Say that is sort of feels like Branagh wanted to relive his "glory days" and take the Henry V play and throw it into the comic universe via Thor. Well there you have it, Thor (who sounds sort of english) goes off to war and just in the midst of a "bloody battle" (fight with Destroyer) the king (Thor) makes a LONG speech to his men (Sif and the Warriors Three) and only to go back into battle to victory. There was even a moment during the film where I half expected Branagh to make a cameo appearance. There was, of course, the Stan Lee appearance which was hilarious and even the Jeremy Renner appearance (although brief) brought out a few chuckles. It was almost like Branagh was so caught up in the Hamlet/Henry V aspects of the story that everything else was just glossed over.

Don't get me wrong. I did not hate Thor. I found it passable. It kept me entertained for the full 130 minutes, even though it was a bit of a stretch at times. I thought Chris Hemsworth was as good a Thor as was needed and his chemistry with Natalie Portman was believable, even though she came across like a bit of a giggly-girl meeting her very first crush. I found that Kat Dennings as Darcy to actually be the best character, even though she was really only there as the comic relief (which wasn't really needed since Portman was doing well enough with that on her own). Even Stellan Skarsgard was a fine addition to the cast as Erik Selvig. I will say that I sort of had a hard time with Tom Hiddleston as Loki though. He was the only character I felt wasn't really all there and I kept picturing Joseph Gordon-Levitt in his place since it was just as bad a role as Cobra Commander. They also kinda look alike. And unfortunately I keep almost forgetting that Anthony Hopkins is even in the film. I love the man to pieces but Odin is the second least memorable character and his role in the film is so small that I find it hard to believe that Hopkins even accepted the role. I guess he just wanted to play a few more gods and monsters before retiring.

Over all I give Thor a 2 out of 5. It's not a film that will blow your mind, but it is at the very least entertaining. I'm sure that it will do fine in theaters, maybe even well enough for Marvel Studios to attempt a round 2 with the franchise (however I wouldn't hold your breathe since it can't touch the Iron Man franchise with a ten foot pole). It will be interesting to see what happens to Thor in the Avengers which is due out next week.

Lollipop Chainsaw -- PAX 2012 game play

2012-04-09T19:39:00.000-04:00

This weekend I attended PAX East in Boston and have to say for it being my first time at the con it was one hell of an experience. I'm not much of a PC gamer but the crowd I went with are some serious games. It was 2 days of PC games and board games, and when I needed a break from it all I managed to sneak away for a little xbox game play of my own.

My biggest highlight from the weekend was Suda51's latest game, Lollipop Chainsaw. I stood in line for almost 2 hours as I anxiously waited for my turn in the bus kicking some ass with Juliet. Yes it's a basic hack and slash zombie game but with the twist of a high school cheerleader being the main character for gameplay and the periodic assistance from her boyfriend's head (when placed on a glowing blue zombie) is a hilarious and fun take on the genre. With a chainsaw in hand and constant need to collect lollipops to regenerate health, Juliet is the most fun I've had recently. I love the concept of the Sparkle Hunting making this pom-pom carrying killer a blast to play. Even the comic elements that give the overall look and feel of the game something I'm totally looking forward to playing.

Lollipop Chainsaw is set to hit shelves on June 12, 2012. Make sure to stop in at your local Game Stop and pre-order your copy today.

Peter and the Starcatcher -- Off-Broadway Review

2012-04-02T20:57:00.000-04:00

If you are in the NYC area, or will be before April 24th I HIGHLY RECOMMEND that you take a trip out to a small off-broadway theater to check out this amazing show. Having been an avid Peter Pan fan since a young child, and for some reason seem to be spending my 25th year on a madd hunt following the lost boys around the country, this is one adapted tale that is unlike any that has come before.

Peter and the Starcatcher is a fun, rather adult, telling of how Neverland and the infamous lost boys came to be. With a cast of unforgettable characters, witty dialog and a light sprinkling of modern jokes writer Rick Elice has given the ultimate fan a play that I'm likely never going to forget. Staged in a small theater, and having chosen a front row seat, I got an up-close and personal experience as the cast took me on an amazing journey from England to a small island when the H.M.S. Neverland is shipwrecked.

With a small stage the set design is quite simple, but the originality of items used to create the props, costumes and set itself is quite amazing. Giving the production more of an improv feel as the actors are fully the ones propelling the story forward as they illustrate the battle between the Bristish sailors and pirates seeking to steal the Queen's chest. This alone is like a treasure hunt game as it gives children in the audience a chance to try and find how many household items are used to create the set and costumes. A perfect example is the opening act in the second half. Being so close to the stage I actually had to avert my eyes from some of the actors because watching them in their mermaid costumes, and the faces they were making as they sang was so hilarious that if I dared look directly at them I knew I would not be able to keep a straight face. You can tell that these talented actors truly enjoyed playing these characters as they surely got to be children once again playing make-believe.
Peter and the Starcatcher is an amazing play full of amazingly talented actors that really desereve immense recognition for this little play. I wish I had been able to get this information out sooner so more could enjoy it, but there is a little over 1 week left, and if you are looking for something fun that you will surely never forget this is it. It is an "all hands on deck" performance as the actors play multiple roles and the bring to life and whole new vibe to the classic Peter Pan story. If the young kids in the audience are old enough to really appreciate the humor, it will kick off a whole new generation of Peter Pan fans.

So please check out the video below and then check out the link to the New York Theatre Workshop website to grab yourself a ticket before the curtain call. You will not regret the decision.

Cast:
ADAM CHANLER-BERAT A Boy/Peter
CARSON ELROD Prentiss
KEVIN DEL AGUILA Smee
CELIA KEENAN-BOLGER Molly Aster
KARL KENZLER Lord Aster
GREG HILDRETH Alf
BRANDON DIRDEN Captain Scott
ARNIE BURTON Mrs. Bumbrake/ Teacher
CHRISTIAN BORLE Black Stache
TEDDY BERGMAN Grempkin/ Mack/ Fighting Prawn

THERE BE DRAGONS -- Review

2012-04-02T15:53:00.000-04:00

I have always found foreign films to be something of an acquired taste. There are stories that are so interesting that you cannot help but want to watch, there are images that are either so original or so stunning that you just have to watch play out, and then there are those that fit into a niche that you follow and watch out of fan-dom. There Be Dragons is a story, that truthfully I know nothing about. Granted it is not a "true story" and the fact that it is "inspired by true event" is something that so many story tellers and filmmakers use today that it's almost become a bit of a joke, however this is anything but a joke.

The story is told with such passion that you cannot help but feel for all those involved. I'm not just saying this because it's being told during a time of war, but because each and every character is brought to life and they literally jump off the screen at you. In addition to the beautiful story, the cinematography is something I've never seen before. I have gotten used to spanish cinematographers and their unique filming styles, but Gabriel Beristain takes it to a whole new level. With sweeping shots, original camera placement used to very distinctly tell you exactly who you would be focusing on, to transitions between time and place that move you through the film in such a way that it will literally take your breathe away if you truly understand and appreciate all of the work and effort that goes into making a film like this.

There Be Dragons transports you back to Spain during the 1930s in mind, body and soul. The sets are georgous, the wardrobe and costuming is stunning, the acting is exceptional, and every little detail that went into this historical epic, written and directed by Roland Joffe is something to be seen. Regardless if you know anything about the Spanish Civil War, or anything about Josemaría Escriva who the story is about, this is a film that should not be missed.

I give There Be Dragons a 5 out of 5.

Dylan Dog -- REVIEW

2012-03-29T20:41:00.000-04:00

Dylan Dog is one of those films that feels like it was made in the 90s, and had at some point probably aired on Sci-Fi (before it became Syfy) and had a large enough following to have a small indie production company offer it a limited theatrical release. The actors are your typical sci-fi "studs" circa now... and could have just been an added episode to the Being Human series that is now airing on the network. Granted Sam Huntington is playing a zombie named Marcus in Dylan Dog rather than a semi-pathetic werewolf, but even Brandon Routh (Superman Returns) has one of those "has-been" vibes going on in his portrayal of the lead character Dylan. And of course lets not forget Taye Diggs who sadly offers nothing more than an impeccable smile throughout the entire film even though he is supposed to be the "big bad"... well technically.

I'm not exactly sure where to start with this film since it first started out like an old throw-back to PI films, where as the trailers lead us to believe that Dylan was supposed to be this "watcher" of sorts which I found quite interesting since it would be like a "b-film" version of the Night Watch series that came out of Russia. I couldn't help thinking "Oh cool a campie watcher film... SWEET!"... but sadly the only thing that kept my interest was the overly cheesy dialog, Buffy/Star Trek style make-up from the early 90s, and the horrible continuity throughout the film that ultimately turned into a scavenger hunt as to how many mistakes were not caught (**if you go watch keep a close look at Digg's teeth... you'll be able to figure out which "monster" is him and which is his stunt double**).

Granted I will say that the film does have a few moments of glory in the campiness of the film when Dylan and Marcus are sharing the screen, and I will admit it was nice to see some of the "old" vampire make-up making a quick (and hopefully brief) come-back, but other than that this film is sadly nothing to write home about. And please don't even get me started on the female love interest. Anita Briem, who plays Elizabeth, might be a pretty face to look at for the 107 minute running time, but she is a worse actress than the ladies of the sexploitation era. I myself found The Jezebels (aka The Switchblade Sisters from 1975) to be quite hilarious, but man can Anita Briem give these ladies a run for their money on lack of talent.

Over all I would recommend saving Dylan Dog for a rainy night if you have nothing else to do. I give Dylan Dog a 2 out of 5.

The Change Up -- REVIEW

2012-02-22T16:43:00.000-05:00

When it comes to body-switch comedies most people think of family films like Freaky Friday, Big, 17 Again, and even, The Hot Chick.  This weekend we get a new take on this old storyline, but the success or failure of The Change-Up is up for debate.  From the director of Wedding Crashers and the writing team that brought us The Hangover, one would think that a grown-up take on the otherwise family friendly genre, would have potential to be a success. The Change-Up, however, takes the risk of being so over the top and inappropriate that it borders on the side of an epic failure.  From poor pacing and characters, that are just plain irritating, I’m sorry to report that there is very little to give praise.  Having been a fan of the original Hangover and just about any project involving Jason Bateman, I was extremely excited to see this film, especially, having just having come off the amazingness that is Horrible Bosses.  Unfortunately, I feel that with this film, the writing team just shot themselves in the foot and put the final nail in the coffin when their latest round of TV spots were released.

Having added only one line to their new 30-second spots, it is almost a plea for people to avoid this film like the plague.  I mean, let’s be honest here, if you hear “The director of Wedding Crashers and the writers of The Hangover take the body-switch comedy where it's never gone before" would you really go running to the theater to check out the film?  Personally, every time I hear that line I get chills from the scheer memory of how horrible this film is and the pain that I suffered watching it. 

Don’t get me wrong, if you are a fan of bad jokes made in poor taste that are delivered back to back with no time to recover, than I’m sure you will enjoy this film but the overall shock value of the dialogue is caked on so heavily that there is no time to recover and truly appreciate the joke (if there is one).  Truth is, the entire time I sat in the theater I seriously wished I could just reach over and smacked the stupid out of Reynolds character because it was so beyond what I was willing accept.  All the while I was watching, I had only one hope and that was, that something might happen that would actually make me care for one of the characters, but sadly Bateman’s Dave Lockwood was so likeable, I wanted him to mess up somewhere and try to live a little, while Reynolds’ Mitch Planko was such an ass I just wanted someone, if not on screen, than off screen, to beat him up.  What makes all of this worse is that Bateman was on such a career high that he was overdue for a bad film, and poor Reynolds is still riding off one relatively bad box office film, Green Lantern, and I was hoping this might be a step in the right direction.  I can only hope that these good actors in bad films, will be short lived, because each deserves better roles than those provided in The Change-Up. 

Overall I would recommend a pass on The Change-Up.  If you are looking for a good comedy and have not yet seen Horrible Bosses that would more than make up the gaping hole brought on by David Dobkin’s latest film.  I give The Change-Up a 1.5 out of 5 and highly recommend that the guys out there do not make your ladies watch this film. If you want to go do a guys night and then compare notes on how your life compares to these guys that's fine, but if you have no interest in doing either avoid the film completely and you will be a much happier person.

Paul -- REVIEW

2012-01-19T23:23:00.000-05:00

Hollywood had three alien invasions hit theaters this month, each dramatically different films. Disney's Mars Needs Moms is a family friendly animation, Battle:LA is an action heavy flick with an Independence Day meets Cloverfield feel, but it is Paul that clearly brings the house down with an amazing balance of story, comedy and geek-tastic references. Although the box office might rank Battle: LA higher than Paul, I would not judge the films in that order. I think Paul is a film that brings all elements of film-making together into a perfect package for sci-fi lovers. I mean lets be serious here... sci-fi geek-dom is something known world wide and if you cannot laugh at yourself for being a fan of some of the craziest films to be made and probably even being one of those "obsessed" fans who dress up to go to 20-minute previews, or stand in line for HOURS, or rush the lines at (enter name here) Comic Con than what else do we have to offer this world? I myself am a proud fan and willing to admit that I camped out to attend a 20-minute preview of Serenity as well as bought passes to both the NY and San Diego Comic Cons last year... not to mention drove cross country just to attend the events in San Diego... so for that fact alone I fit right in with writer Clive Owen (Nick Frost) and his illustrator Graeme Willy (Simon Pegg). If you have seen the film you know what I mean.

Paul is one of those films that gives you a taste of everything that is great about sci-fi with amazingly funny characters that drive the story home. The visual effects are well done that it doesn't even miss a beat. It almost comes off like a live-action version of American Dad only with better human characters. Graeme and Clive are some of the quirkiest characters I've seen since Fanboys but I love every bit of them. Then there is Paul. Oh Paul, you will win over the hearts of the human race and all it will take is the twirl of a finger and some inappropriate nudity. Although I normally cannot stand Seth Rogen, I found him to be the perfect voice to give life to the extraterrestrial. Although Paul does steal the show (and rightfully so) the combination of Kristen Wiig (SNL, Whip It and Extract), Jason Bateman (Juno and Arrested Development), Jane Lynch (Glee), John Carroll Lynch (Fargo), and Blythe Danner (Meet the Parents) there is nothing but comedic gold from start to finish.

From amazing comedic timing, a great ensemble cast and a wide range of jokes, references and puns off of previous sci-fi films there is very little that goes wrong - well plenty goes wrong but the quality of the film has few flaws. The two elements that I most enjoyed were the jokes made at "shock value", some moments even made me drop my popcorn they were so outrageous. On top of that I felt a personal connection as the route I took while driving to the San Diego Comic Con took me to the infamous site used for the final scene in the film. It was nice to recognize exactly where they were going and WHY. Granted I am an 80s baby, but I was born in the late 80s so some of the references come from films and other references before my time. However having a brother that is 12 years older helped me catch a lot of things that others my age missed. I will confess I felt like quite the geek during my screening being over of the "older" people in the audience and actually picking up and laughing at some of the scenes and was shocked when it took the group of college kids sitting next to me the ENTIRE film to recognize who the voice of The Big Guy was.

Paul is a great flick to kick back and have a good time. I'm actually considering going again to see if there are any additional references I missed the first time through. I give Paul a 4 out of 5. If you are a fan of sci-fi and have either attended a comic con or just love to laugh than this is your film.

The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus -- REVIEW

2012-01-10T23:20:00.000-05:00

If given the opportunity to walk into your own wildest dreams, would you take it? Would you walk through a mirror, into the unknown, unaware of the actions or consequences of what that journey might be, and just hoping to come out the other side as close to the same as you went in? What if there was an incredibly attractive person sweet talking you into the idea? Terry Gilliam's film The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus is an interesting twist to the story of deals made with the devil. It is a little hard to watch at times, and at others the visual content over powers the story itself leaving you feeling almost dizzy. The film feels like a bit of a mash-up of the visual styles of Tim Burton and Guillermo del Toro, with a clear sense of madness present within each of his characters.

Heath Ledger plays Tony, who it seems all on his own embodies a collective of characters previously played by Johnny Depp. It was odd to watch him speaking like Jack Sparrow, and yet having Willy Wonka and even the Mad Hatter coming through. It was almost as though he modeled his character primarily off the works of the other actor, or rather that director Terry Gilliam had modeled this particular character after friend and actor Johnny Depp. I feel puzzled as to where the choice came from or if it was just something that might become apparent to only some, and yet I also question if it may have been caused by the extreme measures that had to be taken to complete the film after the unfortunate passing of Heath Ledger during production.

Ever since news was released regarding how Mr. Gilliam planned to complete the film I was a little hesitant as to how he would be able to pull off having one character played by 4 different actors. In a weird way Heath Ledger, Johnny Depp, Jude Law and Colin Farrell all have similarities that could make it a little easier for them to play the same character, but I questioned whether or not it would be effective or if it would hurt the film. If you have read any news on Mr. Gilliam's choice to use these particular actors you will know that it was done because these men were friends of the late actor, and the choice to keep it "in the family" was made out of respect for Ledger with the film being dedicated to him upon its release. It is touching to know that so many people offered to step up to the plate and help the production when the tragic news haulted the film, and even more so to know that Ledger had touched so many people's hearts and particularly that a director would turn down so many people and only choose someone that knew and could honor the memory of such an amazingly talented actor in the way that he should be remembered. Depp, Law and Farrell channeled Ledger in every sense, with hair and make-up added into the mix to help with the visual aspect. I just wonder what it meant to these actors to have such a weight placed on their shoulders to pull off this particular type of role. It was not just the role of a character, but also the role of upholding the memory of a fallen actor in his final role.

The world of the imaginarium, or rather what we see from inside Doctor Parnassus' head, is truly a fantasy world fit for any child's wildest imagination. This is the world in which we find Depp, Law and Farrell. Each time Tony walks through the mirror and enters the imaginarium, we are given a different glimpse of who he is and his face is never the same. The first Imaginarium Tony is played by Johnny Depp and in this world it is an upper east side class of woman that he entertains with his charm and good looks. The second imaginarium Tony is played by Jude Law, and in this we see the scheming, sly character in which we begin to see the true colors of who Tony really is. The third imaginarium Tony is played by Colin Farrell and it is at this point when Doctor Parnassus' daughter has fallen for the sweet talker and it is only through the help of another member of the traveling circus, Anton, do we finally see just who Tony is.

The sometimes overwhelming visuals highlight the traveling show and the magic of the imagination. I found that I sometimes needed to dig through the images to find the cast, even though I knew that on their own they would stand strong. The traveling show's crew was graciously made of up such talent as Christopher Plummer as Doctor Parnassus, supermodel Lily Cole as his young daughter Valentina, Andrew Garfield as Anton, and Verne Troyer as Percy. They are later joined by the collective cast of Tony's, and even Tom Waits who plays Mr. Nick whom Doctor Parnassus places bets with the devil for life, love and even his daughter's freedom. It is the ever betting man and his wagers with the devil that lead the story through Terry Gilliam's wild imaginarium.

As a whole the film is worth watching just to see what wild things Terry Gilliam can come up with. The actor's performances are great when you can see them, but the ever changing visuals sometimes become too much and you have to look away if only for a second. I would give this film a 3 out of 5 for story, but a 4 out of 5 for originality and imagery. As dedicated to Heath Ledger, the actors help up their part of the bargain and gave you a deep character that makes you think about life. Thank you Heath for such a great performance. You are surely missed as a shinning star and great talent.

Transformers: Dark of the Moon -- REVIEW

2012-01-02T16:50:00.000-05:00

First off I should preface this by confessing that I am a big transformers fan: 1) I blame my brother for introducing me to the cartoon series at a young age and 2) I blame Michael Bay for making it look so badass to be a transforming robot. I mean, let’s be honest here, Bay has created three films for a franchise that can now continue to grow by showing younger generations that “old” cartoons make for some pretty cool stories (and toys).

Granted, I should give myself a disclaimer, adding that Bay is not a great story teller, by any stretch of the imagination, and his films aren’t meant to be Oscar winning or anything close to that, but it is obvious that he knows how to entertain an audience. But let’s digress, as I need to just throw this out there to who hate Michael Bay, perhaps you need to look beyond the story, sure there the story is faulty, but you do have to admit the skill Bay shows creating explosions and CGI transforming robots is the coolest thing and for the audience he is creating for, it is beyond cool.

So to all you Bay haters – Get over it! Stop beating yourself up trying to make Bay anything more than he is: a genius for bigger, badder things that go boom, with an eye for detail with CGI that make fans nerd-gasm in their pants. Mhmm I said it, and all you out there reading this know exactly what I’m talking about. Well now that that’s out of the way, let’s get down to the nuts and bolts of why we are here.

Transformers: Dark of the Moon is a visually stunning summer blockbuster. Although, it clearly suffers a bit of a rocky start, leading with some awkward transitions in storytelling and poorly casted extras wearing highly recognizable full face prosthetics that make the actors look like the Barbie factory had a mishap in their Ken department, but by the film’s mid-point, you have all but forgotten the pathetic, torture of the opening scenes, and have moved on to enjoying Bay’s in-your-face entertainment. But before too long you are reminded of the storyline when wait a minute… is that Buzz Aldrin making a cameo appearance (a la Stan Lee style)? Hehe oh yes, it is. Michael Bay all but bitch-slaps the audience with the insanity of humans casted in various roles throughout Dark of the Moon.

So we have covered the astronaut appearance, and we know that Shia LaBeouf returns as Sam Witwichy, Josh Duhamel as Lennox, the whacky John Turturro as “Former” Agent Simmons, Tyrese Gibson as Epps, and thankfully Megan Fox has been kicked to the curb and replaced by British Victoria Secret model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley who is just a hot bod in heels. Yet, it is the new faces that make cast dynamics so interesting; John Malkovich plays Sam’s insane boss Bruce Brazos and Frances McDormand plays the US Secretary of Defense Charlotte Mearing, each of their appearances almost brings about a Burn After Reading hilarity to an already outrageous film. Without giving away too much I just want to add this, it is nice to see McDreamy get his ass handed to him by a kid. But let’s not forget, the Transformers series is not about the humans… it is about the robots!

It was great to see the traditional characters back in action. Bumblebee is adorable as ever (I’ve missed the teary eyed Autobot since Revenge of the Fallen), Ironhide is still a badass, and of course Optimus Prime who has a few upgrades of his own like a trailer full of new toys that he can combine to create even bigger explosions and Decepticon destruction. But it is the quirky Autobots like Wheelie and the addition of Brains and an Albert Einstein look alike Bot named Wheeljack that make it clear that Dark of the Moon is all about having fun. Even the fact that the addition of Leonard Nimoy, who voices Galvatron, brings a smile to ones face and may even bring out some of the Trekkies.

My only real complaint with the Dark of the Moon is that after seeing it in IMAX 3D, I wish that Bay had stepped back and provided a few more slow-motion transformation sequences like those in Revenge of the Fallen was so full of. There is so much taking place in Dark of the Moon, and with characters like Driller (Shockwave’s pet), the screen was so busy I had a hard to focus on all the action. I, personally would have loved to have seen more CGI that the Transformers franchise has become so well known for, and yet maybe even another “big robot balls” joke or two. But all in all the film is highly entertaining, well worth the money and 155 minutes spent in the theater.

Dearest Michael Bay I ask, will you ever again give us a film shy of the 120 minute marker? Although I will happily confess that I am an avid admirer of your “make it bigger” philosophy with regards to explosions, fight sequences and CGI effects, I feel you will leave me no choice but to do the potty dance as I race from the theater after your films. Word to the wise: if you plan to see Transformers be sure to use the restroom before entering the theater and opt out of the Michael Bay size sodas that the concession stands are now selling. This is just a warning for adults, come in pairs, one to watch the kids in the theater and one to make the multiply potty runs.

Cowboys & Aliens -- REVIEW

2011-12-31T20:37:00.000-05:00

Picture this… James Bonds wakes up in the Wild West unable to recall how he got there and then ends up in a town were Indiana Jones and his son have been terrorizing its citizens into doing anything they want… Wait, that’s not right. Granted Cowboys & Aliens does star Daniel Craig and Harrison Ford, as well as share executive producer Steven Spielberg (Indy franchise), there is little else these heavy hitters bring to this futuristic/sci-fi western. If only the film lived up to the overall awesomeness that the trailers teased.

Let’s look at the possibilities from a realistic point of view. 1) Daniel Craig is a total bad ass and could totally whip any aliens ass. 2) Indiana Jones was amazing when we were able to understand him (if you see Cowboys & Aliens you will understand the issue). 3) Cowboys verses Aliens is an amazing concept that has not really been done before. 4) Spielberg rarely has a bad film (this does not include the 4^th Indy, which I’ll never speak of again). 5) The aliens’ aircrafts looked amazing and gave hope to some crazy looking villains. Now that that’s out of the way let’s get back to the review….

Cowboys & Aliens takes the concept of a western to heart as it moves as a leisurely pace that could only be compared to a John Wayne film that takes almost 3 hours to get through. Although there is more than enough time to deliver a story, there are so many missing pieces that you’re lucky if you can walk out of the theater with the slightest clue as to what just happened. Not only is the story missing a few crucial parts and lacking major character development, but by the end you’ll just wish that Doc Brown would suddenly fly in and urge Marty to travel back to the future just as the end credits roll. As cheesy as that sounds, it is probably the only thing that could have possibly redeemed the film from its current state.

Thankfully director Jon Favreau found a balance between story and action that kept the audience in their seats, it’s just too bad the combination was not better delivered. With top-notch actors, a hot actress with a tight toosh (who oddly enough we find out is not quite what we thought she was), and half-assed aliens who pack no punch (who strangely resembled the alien in Spielberg’s Super 8) it’s hard to believe more time had not been spent on fully developing this project. Having come from a graphic novel it should have been a piece of cake since the story was practically already fully laid out and storyboarded for them, but sadly the adaptation strays far enough away from the original concept that if you miss a few crucial lines explaining who/what the aliens are you might as well forget the story completely.

The only thing that makes up for the complete confusion of the story and whether or not this film was official left with an open ending to set up for a sequel, is the recent realization that a 90s TeenNICK show actually predicted the coming of Cowboys & Aliens. If you ever watched 'Clarissa Explains It All' you would have had your first introduction to something almost 20 years in the making. Now I think the only question left is… Would Cowboys & Aliens have made a better 90s film than the film we have today?

That being said Cowboys & Aliens is a decent film that will at least kill 2 hours if you have nothing better to do.

**this review was originally written for PacManandTheHotOne.com. check out the site for more reviews and follow the link to the original posting (http://pacmanandthehotone.blogspot.com/2011/...owboys-aliens-2011.html)

HORRIBLE BOSSES -- Review

2011-07-07T13:51:00.000-04:00

We have all, or know someone who has had a horrible boss at one point or another. That one person who makes us want to down a bottle of tequila (or whatever alcohol you prefer) by the end of the night, or just simply makes getting up and going into work the one thing that we don't wish we never had to do. But what would happen if we were some how able to get our revenge. Would you act alone or would you enlist the help of a friend to carry out whatever vicious method of revenge you choose? And how are would you go to get rid of that one person that makes your day the most unbearable event in your life? Horrible Bosses plays with this idea and delivers a level of insanity that will have the entire audience laughing from start to finish.

Horrible Bosses is a film that will make even your worst day look like a walk in the park. The amazing talents of Jason Bateman (Arrested Development and Juno), Jason Sudeikis (SNL and Hall Pass) and Charlie Day (It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia) only adds to the overly outrageous events that will play out before your eyes. Their comedic timing is the perfect combination of wit, sarcasm and hilarity that is only aided with the additions of Kevin Spacey who plays Kevin's (Bateman) boss, Colin Farrell who plays Kurt's (Sudeikis) boss and Jennifer Aniston who plays Dale's (Day) boss.

Personally I found Horrible Bosses to be a non-stop laugh that was an even rival to the original Hangover, and even a close competitor to the amazingness that is Bridesmaids. For the simple fact that studios are now venturing into open waters with well written comedies that can easily rival any summer blockbuster action flick is a nice change of pace in comparison to what we are used to seeing in past years. I can only hope that they let the goods things go and not try to make unnecessary sequels just to make a few extra bucks (*cough* Hangover II *cough*). Horrible Bosses is one of those films that people of all ages and backgrounds will be able to go and enjoy because everyone can release as we have all had a horrible boss at one point or another in our lives.

Biggest Highlights:
1: Don't expect anything because you don't know what's going to happen AND IT'S AWESOME!
2: Although we might be sick of Aniston these days... seeing her in this role is one that you'll be able to enjoy over and over again.
3: Never underestimate a horrible boss.

So live vicariously through Dale, Kurt and Kevin as they act out all of our dreams of revenge towards the people who have (and possible still are) made your live a hell during the hours of 9a-5p.

I give Horrible Bosses a 4.5 out of 5.

THE HANGOVER: PART II -- Review

2011-05-26T11:35:00.001-04:00

There is something tragically sad when Hollywood feels the need to take a good thing and destroy it. Granted the failure of Part II was not an epic fail, but it was close enough to have been a complete disappointment.

The Hangover Part II is one of those films that you go into hoping for something to be delightfully surprised by, and granted there were a few jokes that were quite shocking, but the overall effect of the film did not survive the curse of unnecessary sequels. The first film was such a shock to the system that there was little wrong that could be done and no matter what your tastes are for humor The Hangover appealed to you. The wildly over the top and insanity that the wolfpack brought was a unique thing that charmed us all. Part II unfortunately took advantage of the original fans and gave us little to walk away with.

I honestly question if the final film failed because of the lack of secrecy surrounding the film as they suffered several "leaks" during the production process with regards to story and casting of cameo appearances. I have read interviews stating that director Todd Phillips respected the wishes of cast and crew to not push to keep Mel Gibson for the "surprise" cameo as the tattoo artist, and on some scale I almost respect the director for that, but in a way (regardless of my lack of respect for Gibson today) I actually wish he had been used. It would have been an "in-your-face" that the film just lacked. I missed the insane LVPD who used the wolfpack as stun gun test dummies and I feel that, although still not as great, the Gibson cameo would have been on a level appropriate for The Hangover.

Overall I was not impressed by the Part II. Too much time was spent on the "family dynamics" which were practically useless for the film. Not enough time was spent developing cameos that could have actually added to the franchise. Paul Giamatti could have been such a badass and he just wasn't utilized to the best potential for the characters and film. Liam Neeson was so unrecognizable as the tattoo artist that the cameo was COMPLETELY LOST and the joke fizzled and fell so short that the film no longer felt like it had anything to do with The Hangover. There was one additional cameo at the end of the film that was so painful to watch and listen to that I wish it had almost been left out. Actually aside from Chow and the final cameo there was little that brough the 2nd film back to the original.

I am very sad to report that I give The Hangover Part II a 1.5 out of 5. I had such hopes that the franchise would at least survive a second film, but that did not seem to be the case. I know it has been thrown around for the idea of a third installment if Part II does well, and I honestly doubt the film will do well enough. Even though my love for Galifianakis runs strong, he couldn't even save the film in his over the top insanity. My only recommendation is to pass on The Hangover this week and maybe pick it up in the $5 bin at Target/Wal-Mart.

PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: ON STRANGER TIDES -- Review

2011-05-19T15:23:00.001-04:00

When it comes to pirates there are very few things that can go wrong. Well, a lot can go wrong, but Disney has found an amazing ensemble cast that brings to life their amusement park ride to such perfection that even after four installments we have yet to get bored with the series. Truth is I sort of missed Gore Verbinski as the director, but Rob Marshall did a decent job having primarily come off of directing musical. But it wasn't just the director who left the franchise, Will Turner and Elizabeth Swan, have (THANKFULLY) moved on as well, and I was glad that there was no reference or cameo to them and we were left with only our most favorite of the characters. In 2007 I remember wondering if another Pirates film would get made, and here it is, almost 4 years later and at the risk of taking the franchise beyond the 3rd film, On Stranger Tides does not miss a beat.

With the return of Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp), Gibbs (Kevin McNally) and Barbossa (Geoffry Rush), it is only a matter of minutes before you are shown the pace at which the 4th installment will be taking you on this high seas adventure. Johnny Depp reprises his character will a consistency that is amazing because it has been almost 4 years since we last saw the quirky pirate on screen, and it is as though he never left. With a slightly updated wardrobe, a few new scars and a treasure chest full of one-lines and jokes that remind you why you love this character so much. With the butting conflict between Jack and Barbossa, the rivalry between pirates is as entertaining as ever. In addition to the original characters, Penelope Cruz and Ian McShane join the cast as Sparrow's love interest Angelica and her father, the infamous pirate Blackbeard. These two characters breathe new life into the series and rises the bar to the talent and character chemistry. Although they seem to have been overlooked by press during the junkets as all eyes were turned to the new comer Astrid Berges-Frisbey who plays the mermaid Syrena, but without giving too much away, she is cute and serves a purpose but there are far more crucial characters that bring the film to life.

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides brings back everything there is to love about the pirates we have spent the last 8 years with and introduces a handful of new characters, a feisty female pirate, and a witty Blackbeard that will give Jack and Barbossa a run for their money when it comes down to a battle of wits.

Highlights:
1) JACK IS BACK!

2) The opening scene is typical of the humor of Pirates and it sets the pace for the film so you know you will be in for one wild ride.

3) Ian McShane as Blackbeard is as fun to watch as his portrayal of the ruthless Al Swearenger in 'Deadwood'.

4) The final scene of the film will leave you laughing until you cry as Angelica tries to put Jack in his place.

Downside:
Don't bother catching the film in 3D. Although the film is fun, the 3D is distracting as the "blurry images" are seen regardless of actually wearing your 3D glasses.

Overall Pirates of the Caribbean: On Strangers Tides is a fun family film that will have you falling in love with pirates all over again. I give the film a 4 out of 5 and beg Disney "PLEASE GIVE US ONE MORE!"

BRIDESMAIDS -- Review

2011-05-05T11:56:00.000-04:00

I have always wondered what would happen if all of the "dirty laundry" us women carry around was aired (or screened) in front of the general public. Not just our moments of madness when it comes to life, work, and dare I say relationships... but what if we all just let it hang out? Well, Bridesmaids does just that and it seems like there is no turning back from where this film takes it.

From the opening scene (which I will not give away) you are immediately introduced into one of the craziest WTF moments. Being about 3-5 minutes of pure uncomfortable awkwardness that you will feel with the character that will have you gasping in shock, and I'm sure that on some level EVERYONE will be able to relate to the events that are being played out, be it in a past relationship or even a current fling, and that alone sets the mood for what the rest of the film will bring you. Kristen Wiig is hilarious as Annie, and every woman in the theater will be able to relate with her and what she is going through. I know so far this sounds like it is a woman's film... and it probably is... but if you want to get a little glimpse into the mindset of us ladies (as I'm sure there are those of you out there still saying "I just don't get women") than this might just help you out a tiny bit. Of course there are moments that will turn your stomach as they are so out there that it's amazing they even made the final cut, but overall this is a down to earch hilarious and sometimes over the top "true" tale of what it's like to be a woman.

From the casting choices, to the typical ass-hole we have all (at some point) fallen for, and ulitmately the female rivalries that these ladies go through will outshine the insanity of Alan, Phil and Stu. Melissa McCarthy (Mike & Molly) is brilliant on the big screen as Megan (the groom's sister), Kristen Wiig (SNL and Paul) makes for the perfect leading lady as Annie, Rose Byrne (Damages) is hilarious in her uptight and snobby-ness that she brings to Helen as that one friend who likes to take control of everything, and Maya Rudolph (Away We Go) is adorable as as the bride Lilian and Annie's best friend. There is of course one additional actor, Chris O'Dowd (Pirate Radio), who steals the show at times just for just for being the rock that all of these ladies desperately need.

I hate that I enjoyed this film as much as I did, but sadly for me there is nothing better than watching characters that truly feel like real people dealing with things that we deal with and can truly relate to, rather than the picture perfect hollywood lives we usually are force feed in films and tv. Bridesmaids truly is the female response to The Hangover and the shock value of some of the scenes is so outragous that there is no controling the laughter or jaw-dropping reactions. It gives a punch to the stomach and a kick to the groin, but there are also moments that will touch us in unexpected ways.

Bridesmaids is one of those 'R' rated comedies that deserves to get noticed. These ladies are exceptional and if you are looking for something that will make you laugh-out-loud than this is something I recommend you check out. I just hope you all can hold your lunch as there are scenes that will challenge all of your sense. I give Bridesmaids a 3.5 out of 5.

Forever book trailer released

2011-05-02T10:30:00.000-04:00

Maggie Stiefvater has released a trailer for the third installment to her Wolves of Mercy Falls series. Check out the trailer for FOREVER and then pre-order the book. =)

http://www.fountainbookstore.com/autograph-maggie

Fast Five Rio Premiere -- Recap

2011-04-26T17:44:00.001-04:00

When it comes to red carpet events most people picture gorgeous men in suits and beautiful women is designer dresses, photographers and of course a variety of media outlets to catch sound bites from the celebrities walking the carpet. However every once in a while something different happens. Fast Five brought their Rio red carpet premiere to viewers around the world through live streaming, using several different outlets including Facebook, as well as streaming live to a dozen movie theaters around the country. This seems like an impressive move, but the success of the event is up for debate. Hosted by Fast Five star Tyrese Gibson and former Miss USA Susie Castillo, the red carpet ran a total of 60 minutes, although at times it felt like it was much longer. However had it not been for the over zealous Tyrese, the event would have been a massive fail.

Opening the event was an interview with director Justin Lin who had little to say outside of great compliments for the Fast family. Even after being asked several times if there was plans to be a sixth film, Lin kept mum on the subject.

Dwayne Johnson was the next star to walk the carpet. Dwayne confessed to felling very welcome as one of the newest additions to the family, but the attention quickly turned to a discussion regarding a fight sequence in the film. Tyrese spilled that the fight between Dwayne and Vin Diesel was something that will make Fast Five memorable and Johnson chimed in by saying that “they knew as a team that they had an incredible opportunity to do something”. He added that he would have loved to see Stallone and Schwarzenegger face off, only being beaten if Bruce Willis was thrown into the fight, and that the fight with Diesel was to make up for a fight of that caliber having not yet existing in film. Tyrese wrapped up the interview by asking if Vin and Dwayne were to face off in the real life, who would win? Johnson replied with “I would whoop his ass.”

Paul Walker followed and the only thing that became obvious during this round of questions was the previously unknown bro-mance that exists between Tyrese and Paul, ending with a rather long embrace shared between the two stars. Following Paul was a very awkward moment with the host of MTV Brasil, where he practically dissed a young teen who was attending the event. Needless to say this was only the beginning of the downhill turn the premiere had suddenly taken. With audio issues that plagued the remaining interviews, more awkward moments made by unprepared hosts and timing issues, it suddenly felt like a very unprofessional event and those of us sitting in the theater only hoped that the arrival of the lead star would change things for the better.

Vin Diesel arrived to the carpet in one of the movie’s matte painted Dodge Chargers. Granted this was the highlight arrival, but the interview was just as awkward as the lead up. Host Susie Castillo struggled to keep the momentum moving, and the late arrival of Tyrese was the only saving grace. The first real laugh was brought out when asked if Vin could say one thing to the Fast fans, what would it be and he answered “I live my life one quarter mile at a time,” at which point it became obvious there was a pre-party before the carpet. Trying to bring things back to a serious note, Tyrese once again asked straight up if Vin and Dwayne were to face off, who would win. Vin responded by stepping up to the camera and saying “I’m a New Yorker. I’m the last kid to fuck with.”

Unfortunately there was still another twenty minutes to go before the premiere was scheduled to end and it was a slow drag to keep things moving. With a few sneak peak clips thrown into the mix and what felt like filler interviews with the remaining cast, the only thing left to do to kill time was for Tyrese to plug Twitter accounts, Paul Walker’s company AE Performance, and a little self-promoting regarding his upcoming album. It was a little painful to watch but the few laughs were worth the hour viewing. It was a nice change to see a cast and crew so full of love and respect for each other that it almost because a bit sickening sweet. I’m not sure if live streaming is the way of the future, or if this screening was enough of a success for Universal to try it again but it will be interesting to see what happens in the future.

CHECK OUT MY REVIEW OF THE MOVIE HERE: http://lunch.com/t/6nbf

WATER FOR ELEPHANTS -- Review

2011-04-26T16:45:00.000-04:00

Under most circumstances I love period pieces. All of the research and work that goes into a production from start to finish that makes the film feel authentic. Wardrobe, hair styles, make-up, props, vehicles/transportation, speech, etc. All of the little things that can ultimately make or break a period piece if it is supposed to feel realistic. Right off the bat we are told that "THIS FILM TAKES PLACE IN 1931", like we are being beat over the head with that fact, which I get but I think the images you are shown give you enough to be able to come to that conclusion for yourself.

Water for Elephants is a pretty picture to look at, with potential for something quite good based on their casting choices, but the flick itself falls flat. I can't quite tell you where it missed the ball, but there is just something that doesn't feel right. It might be that the film is too short to really give it the one-two I was hoping for. It might be that the book is so dark and twisted that the studio felt it wouldn't translate well to audiences through a visual medium so they left out some of the more grusome details. It might just be that the cast did not get into the roles enough to deliver truly believable characters. All I know is that when I walked out I felt like I had spent 2 hrs watching people talk in mono-tones and wasn't sure where to go from there.

I'll be honest, I have not read the novel, and in a way I was glad because the last few films I have gone to see that were based off books let me down as they did not live up to the potential of the stories. I went in expecting Christoph Waltz to be this horribly delicious evil man, living up to the type-casting that he has been subjected to since playing Col. Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds, but no. He was sadly not as visious as I wanted him to be. I know it's gross that I'm saying this but I wanted to see him throw around and beat Marlena (Reese Witherspoon), but no he was a bad man... but not a "BAD" man. Even Reese Witherspoon was her usual self, as she gave an average performance. Robert Pattinson did a decent job portraying a 1930s american, and it was nice to see a little color to him than the usual pale white we've been seeing for the last 3 years.

I think my biggest issue with Water for Elephants is that it is presented as a flashback film, and there is no point to it. Maybe the telling of the story in this method is pulled off in the novel, but for the film I'd rather have been unaware of the outcome of these characters than know going in that no matter how much shit they go through in the end everything turns out ok in a happy ending. It made the suspense of the film a little less effective since we knew the main characters were truly in no real danger at all.

All in all I give Water for Elephants a 1 out of 5 for effort.

SUCKER PUNCH -- Review

2011-03-25T01:10:00.000-04:00

What happens when a guy falls asleep playing a video game - say Resident Evil or Lara Croft - who had previously spend the early morning hours playing an old throwback version of Mortal Kombat or Street Fighter? Well most likely he's dreaming of girls who can kick ass... but might somehow resemble Sailor Moon. Yeah I said it. The Sucker Punch trailers gave off the appearance of being something cool like a post-apocalyptic version of Annie, however the reality of the film had it being nothing more than a lame attempt at creating a "hot action flick". The lead character Baby Doll (Emily Browning) looks like the female version of Draco Malfoy in a Sailor Moon costume and although she seems to be able to fight, the over abundance of visual effects completely takes away any necessity to truly know how to act, let alone fight. With her hair color changing from scene to scene and the "film tricks" used to transition between realities the film becomes more of a bore than an entertaining "pretty" action film. I know this sounds harsh... BUT if you give off the appearance of being nothing more than a one trick pony I'm sure people will eventually see through the "cool" blind have up to hide the lack of... story... acting... talent... ummm dare I say lack of everything?

Sucker Punch should have been a film full of eye candy, but it left me constantly checking my watch to see how much longer I had to stay until the end. Granted the cast of ladies was not a complete waste (and shockingly enough Vanessa Hudgens who plays Blondie did not bother me as it was a role that she did little and almost never spoke) as Emily Browning and Jena Malone hold their own throughout the film and Scott Glenn as the Wise Man starts out cool but then turns into a running joke with horrible one liners before sending the girls off into battle.

With a backdrop that changes from World War II to the set of Lord of the Rings as the ladies battle orcs (which I'm surprised Peter Jackson didn't try to sue because I'm sure they were designed by the exact same team of WETA developers used for the LotR series). It was a cool concept, although not completely thought through. The "bosses" that needed to be defeated in each level were interesting however not well developed as some of the story just did not connect. I almost wish Zach Snyder had given up the film-making side and just created an amazing video game because then I would at least feel like I'm achieving something by interacting with the characters and story.

I'm sorry but all in all I can't even say that Sucker Punch is a film strictly meant to be nothing more than eye candy, because it could have been so much better. Yes there are a few AMAZING scenes (although completely created by CGI). Over all it felt like a better attempt at making Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (and if you've seen that movie I'm sure you get what I'm hinting at). Sometimes an idea is better left alone and I personally feel that this is one of them. The only thing I can say is that if you do not believe me now... go see the film and let me know what you think after you see the crap they dished out as the ending.

I give the over all film a 1 out of 5. Visuals for Sucker Punch are a 2.5 out of 5. Soundtrack is a 4 out of 5. So maybe to spare yourself the pain I just endured you'll just go buy the soundtrack and wait til the film comes out on DVD. I wished that's what I had done.

In Memory of Elizabeth Taylor

2011-03-23T11:34:00.001-04:00

The film world has lost one of its greats this morning. Elizabeth Taylor was one of the talents that surpassed all others and it is with sadness that we hear of her passing. Ms Taylor has been the guiding light for so many and she leaves behind dozens of roles that will never be matched by anyone else. Her career spanned 6 decades and included such memorable roles as Cleopatra (Cleopatra), Katharine (The Taming of the Shrew), Martha (Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?), Leslie Benedict (Giant), Maggie Pollitt (Cat on a Hot Tin Roof), and Amy March (Little Women) along with many others. Aside from her award winning roles she has acted along side some of the greatest actors to grace the silver screen -- James Dean in Giant, Paul Newman in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, and Richard Burton (who eventually became her 5th and 6th husband) in Cleopatra, Virginia Woolf and Taming. The legacy she leaves behind is one that will continue to live on in the hearts of anyone who will ever love movies.

Cleopatra (1963)

Little Women (1949)

Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958)

Elizabeth Taylor died at the age of 79.