Therefore, the distance between the monster and the successful entrepreneur may not be so very far.

Jabir P.K.  Friday, January 19, 2022. New Delhi, Reparation Law News Service

Lulu Group announces new malls in Kozhikode, Kottayam; fish processing unit in Kochi. Photo courtesy of Mathrubhumi daily.

Therefore, the distance between the monster and the successful entrepreneur may not be so very far.

‘Download Article: ”The distance between the monster and the successful entrepreneur may not be so very far”, in PDF (Size: 710 Kb)’

[Statement on the 26th Anniversary of Armed Robbery, Kidnapping, Torture, Embezzlement of Huge Funds, etc., by Abu Dhabi Police, the notorious state police, in collusion with Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who perpetrated, masterminded, and triggered many different violent crimes against an India-born UAE investor, and the prolonged Non-enforcement of its half a dozen Court-Judgments, casting shame on both India and UAE and its much-hyped years of diplomatic ties.]

The politicians from Kerala profusely praised the prominent Indian businessman Yusuff Ali MA, Chairman and Managing Director of the Abu Dhabi-based LuLu Group, on the inaugural function of Lulu mall in Thiruvananthapuram on 16th December 2021.

The person behind the $8 billion turnovers of Lulu Group International, unknown to many, is in fact, the unofficial Ambassador for UAE Food Security. His primary duty is to ensure the continuous supply of Agricultural products from India (where else can he fetch it!) to Abu Dhabi, UAE. Indeed, Yusuff Ali is only a tool in the hands of UAE’s so-called de facto head, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, widely known by his initials as MbZ, who maintains a dubious relationship with Ali.

The UAE is comprised of seven Emirates, including Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, Ajman, Umm Al-Quwain, Fujairah, and Ras Al Khaimah. The capital city is Abu Dhabi, located in the largest and wealthiest of the seven emirates. All of us should necessarily understand that out of its total land area, less than five per cent thereof is actually suitable for agriculture and water is being a scarce commodity.

UAE’s self-reliance on food is a critical issue since 90 per cent of its food is sourced from outside the country. Mr Yusuff Ali is building up a strategy for not only self-sufficiency of food products for the UAE, but also for making a stockpile of food and supplies for large-scale disasters, likely the least expected territorial conflict with Riyadh or a military confrontation with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ali was recently appointed as the vice-chairman of the Abu Dhabi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ADCCI), the apex government body for all businesses operating from Abu Dhabi, the UAE’s capital city.

href="http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/european-parliament-votes-to-boycott-uae-expo-due-to-human-rights-issues/">The European Parliament, the EU’s law-making body, passed a resolution on 16 September 2021, calling on the Member States to boycott the World Expo in Dubai, and for international companies to withdraw their sponsorship, due to the UAE’s horrible human rights track record. The UAE is already an ugly repressive regime, systematically carrying out grave human rights violations on scores of independent lawyers, judges, academics, writers, and critics, and state crushing the dissent simply because of their insistence on their right to freedom of expression.

The UAE’s leaders have marketed their country as a place that’s open to all kinds of businesses, with secrecy, complexity and control. Many members of Emirati royal families have greatly facilitated the procedure in return for commissions that can equal as much as 25% of the profits. The ‘Pandora Papers’ (ICIJ) revealed it as an invitation to criminals to make the most of it. The ICIJ document defines how strategies used to launder dirty money, conflict gold trade, and other financial crimes and ways to build wealth through investing in free trade zones (FTZs), a network of offshore secrecy hubs in the UAE.

Yusuff Ali operates hypermarkets and retail companies in many Arab countries as well as in Egypt, Indonesia, Malaysia, and India, representing investment funds from Abu Dhabi Government and Saudi Arabian Governments. Last year Yusuff Ali has engaged in a false or misleading representation, in line with Emirati royals, on a campaign for UAE golden visa investment scheme. The media has published his images along with href="https://www.judgmentforsale.com/uae_golden_visa_buyer_beware.html">south Indian movie actors Mammootty and Mohanlal who are holding their passports with the UAE golden visa stamp on them. The rise in celebrities and influencers being granted coveted visas have already sparked debate over the UAE citizenship laws.

According to Sofia Kaltenbrunner, campaign manager for Freedom in the UAE, an international NGO, the UAE’s increasing efforts to issue golden visas to social media influencers and celebrities is part of the country’s PR campaign to portray itself as a “modern, open and tolerant state”. “It is time to end the glaring hypocrisy of UAE citizenship laws and recognise children of Emirati mothers and stateless groups as Emirati nationals on an equal basis. The UAE is one of the most repressive states in the MENA region and any prisoners’ families have been stripped of their citizenship to intimidate them into silence,” she says.

Nicholas McGeehan, the UAE researcher for Human Rights Watch (HRW), branded the country as a ‘black hole’ for many basic human rights. UAE prisons are notorious for unhygienic conditions detainees are packed like sardines with widespread denial of adequate medical care. The UAE authorities often considered Indian citizens merely as ‘thieves and procurers’. This mentality has been changed or set aside when the food security issue has become at the top of the UAE agenda. Another factor is that Indians have become the largest non-Arab investors in UAE real estate.

The href="http://www.judgmentforsale.com/blog/solidarity-with-uae-lawyers/">UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Gabriela Knaul, criticized the judicial system of the United Arab Emirates being hijacked by the executive branch of the government, after conducting an official visit to the UAE in February 2014.”

The ruling regime controls others with aggression, extortion, torture, etc., and shows no guilt or remorse for their actions. The cases decided in the U.S. Federal Court, the High Court of Delhi, and the UAE Court itself, against Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed and his brothers in high profile torture cases established that many of the members in the ruling regime of UAE are genetically criminals and psychopaths.

A UAE court acquitted Sheikh Issa bin Zayed, a brother of Sheikh Mohammed and Sheikh Khalifa (President of the UAE) in a torture case in 2010. The court did not dispute the fact that Sheikh Issa was among those depicted in a graphic video, alongside Abu Dhabi Police torturing his former business partner who lost a load of grain worth 5,000 dollars. The torture involved shooting an automatic rifle around the victim in close proximity as the victim was screaming.  At one point, Sheikh uses an electric cattle prod, a relatively high-voltage electric shock device against the man’s testicles and inserts it in his anus. As the man wails in pain, the Sheikh pours lighter fluid on the man’s testicles and sets them aflame. The final scene on the video shows the Sheikh positioning his victim on the desert sand and then running him over repeatedly with a sport-utility vehicle.

THE US AUTHORITY was honest and reliable to take up the case of a naturalized U.S. citizen, Khaled Hassen, who was allegedly tortured by Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, and the claim was settled roughly 3 years after filing the lawsuit in a U.S. District Court. Hassen, who was held for two years captive in Abu Dhabi prison from at least 1984, brought the suit only in 2009 the >href=”http://www.judgmentforsale.com/articles/us-man-secures-10-million-torture-settlement-against-abu-dhabi-uae/”>Intercept reports.

On the other hand, an Indian-origin UAE investor has fought an excellent fight against Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed, Abu Dhabi, the real culprit in a landmark case (#JabirVsUAE), involving armed robbery, kidnapping, torture, contempt of Courts etc. This habitual offender is still at large despite 4 Judicial Awards from the UAE including the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi (No. 188/1996) and 2 Judicial Awards from the High Court of Delhi (1997-2007).

In this landmark UAE case, an investor, developer-cum-contractor from India was beaten in cold blood by Abu Dhabi Police, kidnapped, extorted money, embezzled huge funds, and kept arbitrarily, often thrown into solitary confinement. The investor was threatened to be killed to stop an ‘execution of a decree’ awarded to him by a Civil Court of Abu Dhabi on building-tower litigation, which was against an associate of Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed.

The investor has been brutally tortured by a group of state police. During a lengthy torture session in an underground torture chamber, one of the fingernails of the investor was entirely torn apart with the skin surrounding the nail. It was terrible the excruciating pain by the policemen ripping off his nail from the nail bed. But the real horror was when policemen forced the investor to lie down on the floor and took some rag clothes consisting of a long length and rolled it on his head, covering the entire face. His hands were tied behind his back and his feet were tied together and blindfolded. His mouth and nose were shut tight with the same rag clothes and started hitting and kicking and was traumatized. The pressure was exerted on his head, neck and all over his body. As a result of the harrowing torture methods, he was coughing and gasping for breath, and he cried for breath for a long time. Soon thereafter the Investor became unconscious and eventually, he was taken to Central hospital-emergency, Abu Dhabi.

There was an inevitable backlash against racketeering, police response and the escalation of concocted stories by authority. The investor remain incarcerated and tortured for around 30 days and was released unilaterally. The defiant Executive, however, continued the violation of Human Rights. In just 3 days, the investor had been abducted once again by the same captors, the powerful criminal-police nexus in the Emirate, and inflicted severe trauma.

As a police state, under a military head, the state police was forced to struggle hard for almost seven months to fabricate false evidence, after framing frivolous charges against the investor while keeping him imprisoned under squalid conditions at the notorious Al Wathba Central Prison and was not permitted and was inaccessible by any of his staff or counsels. But they completely failed in front of the enormous volume of evidence against them. The Abu Dhabi Criminal Court expressed its shock while hearing the incident of police brutality. Hence a speedy trial was announced.

Eyewitnesses were called to testify in Court. A Pakistani witness said that a policeman was holding an iron bar of one-meter length in his hand, threatening anyone who came near the office premises of the investor and was shouting “Indian, Pakistani and Bengalis all are thieves and procurers”. A good number of witnesses from different nationalities, who did not care about the threat of the notorious State-police and public prosecution, dared to explain the facts. This was an unusual occurrence in this country and this indeed helped the Court.

The First Instance Court has issued several orders including releasing the investor from prison, to investigate the crime committed by policemen, and to prosecute the policemen etc. The Appellate Court has held the case on daily basis despite their hectic schedules. The conduct of the Prosecutor was also condemned. A declaration in the Final Judgment by the Apex Court of UAE reads:- ‘All the evidence indicates the properness of the behaviour of the investor’.

The policemen and the local Emirati involved in the crime pleaded guilty by written statements duly attested by Notary. The Prosecution has declared itself willing to accept responsibility to avoid further investigation against the heinous crimes committed by policemen and for their role in subsequent cover-ups.

The Hon. Appellate Full-Court ordered the restoration of the victim’s dignity, rights, and privileges, and to compensate him for all his sufferings illegally inflicted upon him. Any civilized Government, more so a member of the United Nations, should have hastened to implement the Judicial directives. Worst still, the debtor, the UAE government deported the Judgment Creditor in the cruellest and diabolical manner, by ‘false statement of facts as if he was punished for a crime’, in defiance of 4 Judicial Verdicts including that of the full bench of the Apex Court of UAE, thus to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, the deprivation of his liberty, dignity, and property, as such embezzlement of his huge funds, business assets, real estate and other investments in the country.

While the UAE government exercised its fraudulent attitude by flouting the 4 consecutive Judgments of the UAE Judiciary, href="http://www.lawyersindia.com/outsourcing/exhibits_main_2557_case_uae.html">the corrupt and criminal actors of the Union of India outwitted the UAE regime by dragging the most genuine case of an Indian citizen for all these 26 years, despite a total number of 6 Judicial awards from UAE and Indian Courts for securing reliefs.

It is inconceivable that when anti-social elements hatch a conspiracy and attempt virtual destruction of continued life, the violators of law in the State are protected by the UAE administration. The situation cannot be allowed to pass unnoticed by a responsible and civilized Government when the facts and files establish such wanton violations of Human Rights against a citizen. The injustices and cruelties by the UAE administration, against the ‘Judgment Creditor’, remain a serious case with the highest credibility over any other case in India for the World Court.

In this background, the commencement of a new project by the Lulu Group Chairman, the most accomplished ‘double-dealer’, envisaging a massive Fish Processing Plant in Kochi to export fish products to UAE, is never going to be a boon for Kerala, which will only cause to drain out all its precious catches from the sea, the rights and solemn privileges of Keralites, under a largely camouflaged and manipulated trap which will ultimately destroy the marine life across the region.

Conclusion

Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed (MbZ), is arguably the world’s only trillionaire today with a fortune estimated at greater than $1.3 trillion. He is spying on US citizens, carrying out high-profile href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/aramroston/mercenaries-assassination-us-yemen-uae-spear-golan-dahlan">assassinations, and playing a lead role in producing the worst humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen, Libya, Egypt, Somalia, and destabilizing a wider region in the Middle East and Africa.

MbZ shaped the U.S. foreign policy and influenced public opinion in favour of UAE interests during the presidency of Donald Trump through his growing legion of lobbyists. “We have created a little Frankenstein, ” Tamara Cofman Wittes, a former US State Department official and fellow at the Brookings Institution told the New York Times, referring to Prince Mohamed bin Zayed.

This Frankenstein, a monster in the shape of a man, strong enough to unleash the biggest threats to humanity, must be destroyed for the safety of people, civil and political rights in the UAE and in the neighbouring regions.

[Article submitted by Jabir P.K., Founder-CEO, M/s. Overseas Indians Legal Cell. ]

EndNote

On behalf of the “Alliance Judgment Recovery“, I, the undersigned, do hereby request to the citizens of India, the United Nations, the European Parliament, the United States, the United Kingdom, and all other Nations, International Organizations and all the people who believe in democratic values and principles to kindly support us wholeheartedly for the success of this challenging task.

Heavy damages and injuries have already been done by the UAE Government in the past hurting and torturing thousands of helpless people.  Let us do our little might to halt similar torture and other human rights violations.  A calm and quiet life for self and family, free from the inhuman or degrading treatment of any kind is the Universal Right of every individual; we need NOT beg for it or sacrifice for the same.  We can win our goal with a collective and concerted effort. Thank you.

Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information. (Email to: info@legalcell.com)

Twitter.Com/JabirOrg

WWW.UAE.JABIR.NET

Last updated: Friday, January 19, 2022

***

Reference Links 

• “Open Letter to Mr Yusuffali M A, Vice-Chairman of Abu Dhabi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ADCCI)“
• “UAE Golden Visa Marketing & Caveat Emptor, a Latin phrase, that means “Let The Buyer Beware”
• “US$10m Rewards for Help in Leading to the Arrest and Conviction of the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, UAE!”
• “25th Year of Abu Dhabi Police-looting: Govt Keen On Making New Laws For UAE But Brutally Denied Justice To Victim Who Is A Real Judgment Creditor!
• “24th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration” – Chase the Trails of 24-Year ‘UAE Fugitive’, A Habitual Offender!
• “The Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE”!
• “Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud”!
• ‘“The Gravest Injustice Towards An Indian Investor In UAE – Open Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Minister for External Affairs, Govt. of India!
• “A Set of UAE Judgments was Unpaid, remained Unexecuted for the last 22 years! Both the Governments, the Government of India and the UAE Federation are Playing with Fire!”
• ‘“Thanks to State Department Cables, a U.S.Torture Victim Won a Rare $10 Million Settlement against UAE ruling family” – The condition: ‘Silence in the Press’!
• ‘Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!
• ‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’
• ‘The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’
• India’s Extradition Treaty With the United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′
• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for law-abiding citizens!
• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!
• The chapter on BCCI’s early history describes in detail the early history of Abu Dhabi and its fraudulent activities!

Link To Articles
Legal Instruments & References

The Multi-Billion Dollars Judgment Portfolios of UAE, are now on sale. As a lawful owner of the Judicial Awards of the top Court of United Arab Emirates [UAE], the Decree-holder has the right to offer his Judgment for sale and make efforts to legally enforce and recover his rights from the debtors specified in the Judgments.

‘26th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration!’
Be the next person to support @JabirVsUAE for the Enforcement of UAE Judgments, Indian Judgments by becoming a Shareholder today.

“Open Letters to the UAE Administration
‘Open Letters’

Expo 2020 is expected to take place between October 2021 and March 2022 and is part of the rotating World’s Expo. However, the European Parliament is calling on the Member States to not participate.

By JERUSALEM POST STAFF, REUTERS
SEPTEMBER 17, 2021

Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, and Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces (Photo credit: Judgment Debtor)

Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and the de facto head of the UAE Federation at an Arab summit in Mecca, Saudi Arabia May 30, 2019. Courtesy of Saudi Royal Court (via Reuters)

Govt Keen On Making New Laws For UAE But Brutally Denied Justice To Victim Who Is A Real Judgment Creditor!

“Statement on the occasion of the 25th Year of Gang-robbery, kidnapping and brutal methods of torture done in captivity by Abu Dhabi Police against an Indian investor, in the light of a gazette notification by Central Government declaring the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a ‘Reciprocating Territory’, under section 44 A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)”.

Kochi 28 Feb 2020: ‘Reparation Law’ ‘Download the True Story of ‘Govt Keen On Making New Laws For UAE But Brutally Denied Justice To Victim Who Is A Real Judgment Creditor!’, in PDF (Size: 515 Kb)’

Lawsuits brought to redress in UAE courts are twisted by the law enforcement, prosecution and the UAE administration by itself. Police misconduct in UAE involves abuse of power to extort money or in the fabrication of evidence to sway the judicial process. These types of unspeakable crimes are prevalent in the UAE are silently supported by their Indian counterparts, the Union Government.

This reality is aptly exposed in this UAE case featured herein below, as a ‘Marking the 25th Anniversary of Gang-robbery, kidnapping, contempt, etc., by Abu Dhabi Police, in the light of a new legislation of greater importance between the Union of India and the UAE Federation, in line with Section 44 A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).

The Central Government has notified that it recognizes UAE as a reciprocating territory for the purposes of financial recovery from debtors located, or having assets, in India. The courts so designated are called ‘Superior Courts’. This means, the above mentioned legal sanction of India to UAE gives them the freedom to list the names of suspects, who were tried in absentia, and India to chase their defaulters, who have apparently run away from the UAE.

The UAE case is the result of a racially motivated hate crime with assignments of tasks, as part of deliberate design, the law enforcement schemed in collaboration with the Prince Mohammed bin Zayed, the de facto head of Abu Dhabi and the UAE Federation, who was a party to these most serious violations of Human Rights and the Constitutional Rights of a Citizen of India.

The cruelty did not halt there. While the UAE Ruler exercised his fraudulent attitude and ruling deficiency by flouting the 4 consecutive Judgments of UAE Judiciary, the Union of India outwitted the UAE Ruler by dragging the case to date, despite 2 Judicial verdicts from Delhi High Court for securing reliefs.

Here, in this case, a bona fide foreign investor in UAE, the decree-holder of a civil lawsuit, who reported crimes such as trespassing and burglary at his office, was literally kidnapped, tortured, threatened him to be killed and subsequently detained for a long period often in solitary confinement by a group of policemen.

Over 25 years has elapsed since the UAE embezzled the entire assets, real estate properties worth over $100 million of the Investor by fraud, who was an engineering expert, owned and established 3 major companies in General Contracting, Engineering and Trading in Abu Dhabi, UAE, defeating all his relentless fight.

Read the shocking story featured here, the bizarre twist in the case of police extortion in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Shop burgled by Abu Dhabi policemen, US$ 0.4m worth money and valuables looted!

Ever heard of a victim marking the 25th anniversary of the gravest disaster in his life caused by law enforcement authority? It’s the tragic drama of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ in real life.

Regrettably, the discredit goes to the ‘Administration of the UAE, who set ablaze the destruction, by issuing an extremely “Fraudulent Misrepresentation of the Truth” to deport the ‘Judgment Creditor’ from that country, instead of the solemn act of execution of the Judgments passed by the Courts of Law and letting him have the fruits of the Judgments.

A brief background of the story

On behalf of his principal company, the ‘Premier General Contracting Establishment’, the contractor (the Indian Investor herein) had signed a lease-build business contract with an Emirati landlord, ‘Mr. Hassan Saeed’, covering a Nine storied apartment tower.

When a dispute arose with Mr. Hassan Saeed, the Investor, on the basis of legal advice, instituted a civil lawsuit in Abu Dhabi Court for settling the issue.

The Honourable Judge of the Civil lawcourt took a decision in favour of the Investor. Consequently, Hassan Saeed got annoyed and insisted the Investor withdraw the lawsuit unilaterally.

[The following narration is not exhaustive but only a pointer to untold miseries, losses, sufferings; the haunting memories of the ‘cruel and inhuman torture’ and social humiliation suffered by the Indian Investor in UAE].

Scene 1.

On Thursday noon 26th October 1995 Mr. Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Khadir, a policeman in plain clothes from Abu Dhabi police (who haven’t been disclosed his identity), along with Hassan Saeed (the Emirati, accused in the civil case, who has already been warned by the Civil Court against his wrongful motives) came to the private office of the Investor.

The policeman, who held a heavy iron rod of one-meter length and a pair of chained handcuffs. The policeman enquired as to why he filed a lawsuit against him; where’s the original document of the contract? etc., which the Investor refused to disclose.

Scene 2.

As they could not get the required information from the Investor exerting force, they became violent. They wanted to grab and destroy the related documents of the contract from him because an ‘Interim Order’ of the Court already existed against Hassan Saeed.

Towards this the telephone connection was snapped, the entire office was ransacked, drawers opened by force and files were thrown out. The Investor was severely beaten in cold blood and his left-hand fingers were smashed with the iron rod. They paid no heed to the humble requests of the victim.

The policeman forcibly broke open the locker-room with the heavy iron rod in his hand. Thereupon, cash and valuables were found by them.

Scene 3.

So much of money! The policeman’s eyes bulged out in wonder. He looked at his Emirati friend as if he never expected there’s such a large amount of money. The currency blurred their eyes. All in a hurry, both of them grabbed the bunches of currency, and hurriedly stuffed into their pockets. In their hurry and perplexity, part of the currencies spilled over the floor of the cabin.

At this juncture, the younger brother of the Investor arrived at the office with lunch. As he arrived the Investor asked him to close the door and call the police. By then, the policeman in plain clothes managed to get out of the office with the stolen money.

The Emirati too tried to escape from the office, however, with bundled valuables in his hands and pockets full; protruding with the stolen money, he was unable to leave.

Scene 4.

The Policeman in civil dress was standing outside the office and was shouting and striking on the door with the heavy iron rod he held in his hand. By then an inquisitive crowd had gathered around the office of the Investor. The policeman was shouting and warning anyone from coming near to him.

At this point of time, a Police patrol team arrived at the spot. This batch of policemen who came responding to the alert of the Investor immediately hit the Investor and his brother. They were, in fact, allies of the intruders, which the Investor never knew or expected. Their faces had reflections of triumph and cruelty. They were like ferocious animals; both the victims were beaten brutally in cold blood.

Then they handcuffed the Investor and his brother behind their backs and dragged them out of the office, on through the street, and kicked them into the police car.

Scene 5.

The Investor was confined to an underground detention center where he was again brutally tortured. There were four policemen in the torture room, and one shouted “We know how to teach Indians” and asked the Investor to sign some documents. When he refused, a policeman in uniform tried to pull out his injured fingernails with a primitive type of instrument. Due to the heinous form of torture, one of his fingernails was entirely torn apart with the skin surrounding the nail.

It was terrible the excruciating pain by the policemen ripping off his nail from the nail bed. But the real horror was when they forced him to lie down on the floor and took some rag clothes consisting of a long length and rolled it on his head, covering the entire face, and started hitting and kicking. As a result of the harrowing torture methods, he was coughing and gasping for breath for a long time.

Soon thereafter the Investor became unconscious and eventually, he was taken to Central hospital-emergency, Abu Dhabi. Over a dozen X-rays have been taken of the different parts of his body at the hospital and recorded. Treatment was made without removing the shackles and handcuffs.

Scene 6.

When those atrocities were being committed in the detention center, the Investor’s business partner (sponsor), a person belonging to Abu Dhabi met the duty officer of the police station, who is of Captain’s rank. He was then told a concocted story.

That the accused (Investor) had hit three of his police staff and an Emirati, and that one police officer and the Emirati, was in a serious condition and admitted to the hospital and that, they were not permitted to allow him to see the accused.

Scene 7.

The Investor was held in isolated hellholes in different detention centers, often in solitary confinement and traumatized before taking him to the notorious Al Wathba Central Prison.

The Investor was brought to the Federal Court on 27 occasions, dragged with shackles, manacled and cuffed on both hands and legs. The trip was 120 km in an armoured truck to the court and the return therefrom through the desert in harsh weather itself was the worst form of torture. Even when its capacity was 15 persons, about 50 persons were packed like salted fish making each one gasp for breath during the journey.

He was kept waiting all these days in a small and narrow room along with other prisoners without any ventilation or so, but not called up for hearing. It took about six months for the Investor, for listing his case for hearing before a court of law of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Scene 8.

The Court of First Instance expressed its shock while noticing that a victim who sought for police protection from trespassers was arrested and detained!

Eyewitnesses were called to testify in the Court. A Pakistani witness who said that a policeman was holding an iron bar of one-meter length in his hand, threatening anyone who came near the office premises of the accused and was shouting “Indian, Pakistani and Bengalis all are thieves and procurers”.

Another witness who gave a similar statement, added that the Investor has neither resisted the police nor they have beaten anyone and that they are of good nature “I am a Pakistani and they are Indian, no relations are between us, and my testimony is based on truth only. Further, the Court listened to the statement of the 3rd witness who hails from Iran, whose testimony came similar to the declaration of the first two witnesses.

The conduct of the policemen clearly proved the malicious motives of framing criminal complaints against the Investor. It was found that Hassan Saeed was guilty of deception and assault.

A good number of witnesses from different nationalities, who did not care about the threat of the notorious State-police and public prosecution, dared to explain the facts. This was an unusual occurrence in this country and this indeed helped the Court.

Scene 9.

The Judgment of the ‘Legal Court of First Instance’ was pronounced [Case No. 152/1996] on 10-04-1996.

The Investor and his brother, who were charged with offenses by the Abu Dhabi Police, were acquitted. The Court directed the authorities, to prosecute the policemen involved in the illegal activities.

Despite the prevailing political culture, the Legal Court also passed an ‘Investigation Order’ against the heinous crime by Abu Dhabi police and its subsequent cover-ups.

Scene 10.

In a desperate attempt, the prosecution filed an appeal in the APEX Court of Abu Dhabi.

The Supreme Bench, comprising the three-judge panel, granted bail to the Investor on their filing of the appeal. [However, despite the bail and sureties the Investor was not released from the prison].

The eminent Jurists panel was much moved by the massive evidences before them which established beyond doubt, the orchestration of the police and the dishonest deals of the Prosecution. An early trial was therefore ordered.

During the next hearing, the policeman filed a declaration attested by a Notary, where-under he dropped the contentions in his complaint and pleaded guilty. Hassan Saeed followed the suit and admitted his guilt. When the other policemen too pleaded guilty, the competent authority, the Prosecution, has declared itself willing to accept responsibility.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court advised the Investor of his rights to sue against the perpetrators of the crime for damages due to baseless and malicious litigation.

Scene 11.

The final Judgment of the Apex Court was rendered on [No. 188/1996] 19-05-1996. The Hon’ble Court declared that the Investor was absolutely innocent of the charges. The Court observed further that all the pieces of evidence proved propriety in the acts and conduct of the Indian Investor.

The conduct of the Prosecutor was strongly condemned. Referring to the principles of Islamic Law, the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi observed that the law had honoured the man who protected his freedom, his honour, his property, and his soul and that a person dying while protecting that freedom is considered a ‘martyr’.

With regard to the facts of the case, the Supreme Court observed that it was proved in this case, that the policemen and other officials sought to arrest the Investor, without any right and that they curtailed his freedom.

The Court ordered immediate release of the victim, ‘restoration’ of victim’s dignity, respect and reminded about the roles and responsibilities of authority towards the victim for reparation for the losses he suffered while pronouncing a ‘Landmark Judgment’.

(The order of the Court, regrettably enough, was not executed and the culprits were escaped from judicial actions. The Investor and his brother were also not released from prison, in total violation of the order of judicial authority.

Scene 12.

The defiant Executive, however, continued the violation of Human Rights. The UAE Administration committed yet another series of crimes of Contempt of Courts, Fraud, etc., and deported the Judgment Creditor on 28- 09-1996 in the most diabolical manner, without any of his property, dignity or respect whatsoever!

The deportation order was extremely ‘libelous’ – by ‘false statement of facts as if he was punished for a crime’, in defiance of 4 Judicial Verdicts including that of the full bench of the Supreme Court of that country in his full favour!

(The anguish of the Investor resultant from the deprivation of his liberty, dignity, and property, as such his business assets earned solely and exclusively through his untiring personal efforts, causes mental depression which will virtually make his life only a vegetable existence).

Article submitted by Jabir P.K., Founder-CEO, M/s. Overseas Indians Legal Cell (Email to  info@legalcell.com).

Twitter.Com/JabirOrg

WWW.UAE.JABIR.NET

Last updated: 28th Feb, 2020

Reference Links 

• “24th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration” – Chase the Trails of 24-Year ‘UAE Fugitive’, A Habitual Offender!
• “The Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE”!
• “Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud”!
• ‘“The Gravest Injustice Towards An Indian Investor In UAE – Open Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Minister for External Affairs, Govt. of India!
• “A Set of UAE Judgments was Unpaid, remained Unexecuted for the last 22 years! Both the Governments, the Government of India and the UAE Federation are Playing with Fire!”
• ‘“Thanks to State Department Cables, a U.S.Torture Victim Won a Rare $10 Million Settlement against UAE ruling family” – The condition: ‘Silence in the Press’!
• ‘Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!
• ‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’
• ‘The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’
• India’s Extradition Treaty With the United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′
• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for law-abiding citizens!
• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

Link To Articles
Legal Instruments & References – The Multi-Billion Dollars Judgment Portfolios of UAE.
‘25th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration!’
“Open Letters to the UAE Administration
‘Open Letters’

Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.

“24th Year of Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration” - Chase the Trails of 24-Year ‘UAE Fugitive’, A Habitual Offender!

“The Gross Exploitation of Huge Wealth of a Foreign Investor by the UAE Administration” – Marking the 24th Anniversary of Abu Dhabi Police-Looting & Fraud!

‘Statement on the occasion of the 24th Year of Embezzlement of Huge Wealth by Extortion, Gang-Robbery, Kidnapping, Fraud and other Violent Crimes by UAE administration, including prolonged Non-implementation of a set of Judgments of the Legal Courts! – A Gross Miscarriage of Justice Like No Other!

New Delhi 26 Oct, 2018: ‘Reparation Law’ ‘Download the True Story of ‘Chase the Trails of 24-Year ‘UAE Fugitive’, A Habitual Offender!”, in PDF (Size: 455 kb)’

As detailed in the ‘Representation to the Union of India, dated 12-05-2018′, this case is the result of a racially motivated hate crime with assignments of tasks, as part of deliberate design, the local police schemed in collaboration with Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (known as MBZ), Crown Prince and de facto head of the UAE Federation, who was a party to this most serious violations of Human Rights and the Constitutional Rights of a Citizen of India.

There are patent and admitted violation of the precious Constitutional Rights guarantees under Article 14,19,,21 and 300A of the Constitution. The actions and omissions on the part of U.A.E. thus constitute violation of Human Rights for which all countries under the U.N. are liable and answerable.

The Gross Miscarriage of Justice Like None Other the World Has Ever Seen!

The phrase “Miscarriage of Justice” is consistently synonyms with wrongful conviction, referring to a situation in which a person who is actually innocent is convicted of a criminal offense.

Here in this case, a bona fide foreign investor in UAE, the ‘Decree Holder’ of a Civil Lawsuit, who reported crimes such as trespassing and burglary at his office, was kidnapped, tortured, threatened him to be killed and subsequently detained for a long period often in solitary confinement by a group of royal thugs.

He was further treated with all adverse consequences of repeated-victimization, deported him from UAE, that was extremely ‘libelous’ – by ‘false statement of facts as if he was punished for a crime’, in defiance of 4 Judicial Verdicts including that of the full bench of the Supreme Court of that country in his full favour!

The ‘Decree Holder’ was trapped in a fabricated case, but he boldly fought in all the 3 Courts in Abu Dhabi, UAE, against the Abu Dhabi Police, fearless of the negative situations prevailing in that country.

An excerpt of Apex Judgment it reads “All the evidence indicates to the appropriateness of his behaviour”. A full bench of the Supreme Court heard the case and ruled that, there is not a shred of evidence which can prove the accusation. On the contrary there was ample evidence that it was the police who are criminals!

The ‘Decree Holder’ became a winner again, secured 4 consecutive Judgments in UAE against his perpetrators in 1996 but he is still suffering without dignity, respect and all his material wealth due to the fraudulent deportation from UAE by his unscrupulous debtors, the UAE administration!

The Criminal Liability Against UAE Administration

The Criminal Liability for which the person is directly responsible had already been established with a set of Judgments. Any civilized Government, more so a Member of United Nations, should have hastened to implement the Judicial directives.

The execution, the Judicial proceeding will complete only when the ‘Decree Holder’ gets his property or money and compensation for the damages awarded to him as per the Legal Judgments and Orders, apart from a long list of embezzlement of funds and outright fraud.

Had the Court Judgments in favour of the petitioner awarded 24 years ago, i.e., in 1996, been duly executed or granted the appropriate reliefs to the ‘Judgment Creditor’, his case would have been closed then and there. Instead, the UAE administration committed yet another series of crimes of Contempt of Courts, defrauding the Judgment Creditor, fraud etc., and deported the Judgment Creditor in the most diabolical manner!

It’s High Time for the UAE Government to Come Out of its Hideouts, Face the Facts and Uphold the Laws of the Land!

Mohammed bin Zayed, the de facto ruler of UAE, woke up only to ignore 4 numbers of consecutive Court Judgments of his country against him and another Judgment (decree) by default, for guilty of contempt of Courts, perjury, fraud and perverting the course of Justice! [For more details, see 'Open Letter to H.H. Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan', dated 20-04-2018]

The ‘Judgment Creditor’ was an India-born UAE investor in Abu Dhabi, his ‘Business Assets’, including Engineering, Contracting and Trading Firms, stood at a minimum of One Hundred Million U.S. Dollars when the dreadful tragedy took place in the prime of his life.

The Gravest Crime of the UAE Administration which Led to all the Miseries, Irreparable Losses and Sufferings of the Judgment Creditor are Summarized Herein Below, in a Nutshell:

A true story of 24-Years of gross exploitation of huge wealth of a foreign investor in Abu- Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, by offences of Police-extortion, gang-robbery, kidnapping, tortures, fraud etc., apart from contempt of Courts, the prolonged non-implementation of a set of its half-dozen Judgments passed in his favour from both, his host state as well as the sending state.

Mohammed bin Zayed, who is culpable in this most bizarre gruesome crime, had conspired with or rather deployed the Police officials in Abu Dhabi to stop the ‘Execution of a Decree’ awarded to the Petitioner by a Civil Court on an apartment-tower litigation, which was against his associate, an Emirati local.

The policemen did things in the most terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the ‘Decree Holder’, while committing burglary at his office.  A policeman in plain clothes forcibly broke open the office locker with a heavy iron rod in his hand and looted US$.4m worth money and valuables. The Petitioner locked the door and sought intervention from the police. Next to this, the ‘Decree Holder’ had to encounter all the humiliations and the perils in the years that followed. [For more details, see featured article on Abu Dhabi Police-Looting] 

The Petitioner and his younger brother were brutally tortured and abducted from their office by a group of callous policemen who joined hands with the trespassers, and they treated the Petitioner and his brother like ‘terrorists’, beaten in cold blood, kept them isolated in hellholes in different detention centers and traumatized, before taking them to the notorious Al Wathba Central Prison. [For more details, see featured article on ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi, UAE]

They were kept in continuous imprisonment arbitrarily under squalid conditions, often solitary confinement, in order to humiliate or degrade him and was inaccessible by any of his staff or counsels and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

It took six months thereafter, for the petitioner to have his first appearance in Court. A false case was registered against the petitioner under the case No. 152/1996 offenses, alleging “Using force against Government employee and assault”.

Despite all such negative situations, the Petitioner could convince the Judiciary of Abu Dhabi, that the involved policemen were acting upon the instructions of the ruling elite.

The sworn statements procured from witnesses during interrogation, on multiple occasions, were misplaced and or rejected by the Police-Prosecution Mafia operating in that country.

Even Indian witnesses were threatened by prosecutors against testifying the facts. It triggered the witnesses from other nationalities coming forward to give testimonial evidences in Open Courts despite warnings of dire consequences.

The Criminal Court expressed its shock while noticing that a victim who sought for police help from trespassers was deliberately beaten and detained!

The Hon. Court anxiously listened to the evidences of eyewitnesses from different nationalities. Mr. Saleem Raza, a Pakistani who said a policeman was holding an iron bar of one meter length in his hand, threatening anyone who came near the office premises of the accused and was shouting “Indian, Pakistani and Bengali all are thieves and procurers”.

Mr. Zulfiqar Ali who gave similar statement, moreover he added-that the ‘accused’ have neither resisted the police nor they have beaten anyone from the patrolling squad and that the ‘accused’ are of good nature “I am a Pakistani and they are Indian, no relations are between us, and my testimony is based on truth only.

Further the Court listened to the statement of the 3rd witness Mr. Shirban Kalobar, an Iranian, whose testimony came similar to the declaration of the first two witnesses.

The Hon. Criminal Court found the offenders (3 Policemen and the associate of bin Zayed) were guilty and has issued an investigation order towards the crime committed by them.

During the course of hearing, the policemen dropped all charges framed against the ‘accused’, by separate written statements duly attested by Notary Public, pleaded guilty of their illegal actions which amounted to a conspiracy against the petitioner.

When the Policemen and the Emirati, the associate of bin Zayed,  pleaded guilty, the competent authority, the Prosecution, has declared itself willingness to accept responsibility, in order to avoid further investigation in the case.

Despite the prevailing political culture, the Legal Court passed the ‘Investigation Order’ against the heinous police-crime and the subsequent cover-ups. (The authentic Judgement by ‘CRIMINAL COURT’ is available here both, Arabic and its English Translation)

In a desperate attempt, the prosecution moved the Apex Court.  Subsequently, the Full Bench of the Highest Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE, heard the case at length considered the facts and evidence and affirmed the Judgement of the Lower court and approved the investigation order against the culprits, the Policemen and bin Zayed associate. The conduct of the Prosecutor too was condemned.

The Hon. Appellate Full-Court therefore, while pronouncing its Judgment, ordered the restoration of the victim’s dignity, rights and privileges, and to compensate him for all his losses. (The authentic Judgement by the ‘APEX COURT OF ABU DHABI’ is available here both, Arabic and its English Translation)

All the Four Judicial Verdicts of Abu Dhabi Courts were Nakedly Violated by the ‘UAE Administration’ and the De Facto Ruler Refused to Obey and Implement the Court Orders. 

As the case history reveals that with the malicious motive of destroying the petitioner, the repeated orders of the Courts to release the Petitioner and to investigate the conduct of the Police, vis-a-vis the crimes committed by police, the reparation order etc, were defied by the UAE executive, causing extreme hardships to the ‘Judgment Creditor’. This superstition of  Judicial decisions by executive fiat is rank subversion of the rule of law.

The UAE Authority fraudulently twisted the due administration of justice in order to evade the law and avoid its punishment against the perpetrators. The specific order passed by the UAE Judiciary to investigate offences of policemen against the Petitioner such as extortion, gang-robbery, and about the involvement of senior officials in the scheme and other heinous crimes, tortures etc., was never probed in spite of clear evidences. [For more details on Abu Dhabi Police-Torture, see 'The Authentic Reply towards the Letter No.G/3139/2013/MEA (Gulf Division) dated 10-10-2013]

During the course of hearing, the policemen also pleaded guilty of their illegal actions which amounted to a conspiracy against the petitioner. What was left thereafter was ‘only the Execution of Court Judgments to give the sanctioned benefits of those Judgments to the Petitioner. But instead, the Administration of UAE, deported the ‘Petitioner’ to India violated each and every verdicts of the Judiciary of the UAE and committed the serious crime of Contempt of Court.

Worst still, the debtor, the ‘UAE administration’, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, thus to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, his personal images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat, his intellectual property including his valuable expertise in profession. (The authentic Order of [FRAUDULENT] DEPORTATION by UAE Administration’ is available here in Arabic, and here its English Translation)

Ultimately, this fraudulent order of deportation also led to the Petitioner’s character assassination, who had an investor-status in UAE with a group of well established business institutions in the country, worth millions of investments, leaving him in utter penury and physical trauma.

The High Court of Delhi

The ‘legal fight’ for the enforcement of Judgments’ took in very many proceedings before the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi. The Delhi High Court heard the Petitioner’s Writ Petition in 1997 and issued a ‘Mandamus’ to the Union of India, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), to settle the case in ‘Two Months’ with the UAE counterpart. (The authentic Judgement of HIGHT COURT OF DELHI, Appellate Civil Jurisdiction).

The Union of India is Doing an Unpardonable Mistake of Dragging the Case for a Long Period of 24 Years to Date, Despite a Portfolio of Six Legal Judgments, Apart from ‘Contempt of Courts’ and Unlawful Tactics.

In a letter dated 29-04-2018 the Union of India asked the Petitioner as to what action shall be taken to resolve the case! [A copy of letter dated 29-04-2018 the Union of India, is available here in PDF format].

In response thereto, a detailed reply was sent by the Petitioner to the Union Government, about the action to be taken on the basis of criminal contempt and disregard for the laws, rules and orders against the most serious and heinous of crimes by UAE administration, covering all the relevant facts. [For more details, see 'The Authentic Reply to the Union of India, dated 12-05-2018]

The Union government will have to take up the case, at least at this belated stage, by way of parley and negotiations consistent with procedural codes of international laws and conventions. The UAE must be persuaded (or even pressurized) to accept the just claims of the Petitioner for a time bound enforcement of the Judgments, recover embezzled funds and payment of damages for the continued violations of the Human Rights of the petitioner.

If a grossly unjust and illegal stand is persisted in by UAE, and contumaciously too, UAE has to be held further liable for such perpetration of atrocities and gross violation of Human Rights. This can be done effectively, by proceeding against the massive assets and investments made by UAE in the various ventures in India proposed on a collaboration basis (by way of industries and other commercial transactions).

The UAE has adopted a reasonable attitude when it settled the American citizens claims for damages for violation of Human Rights against Abu Dhabi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Zayed, when, the American Court issued process overruling the technical contentions of their diction.

The Order of the Court in the U.S. and the settlement reached between UAE and the complainant therein (Details produced herewith) will buttress the just demands of the Indian National, which Union of India has the honour and privilege to represent.

In the above circumstances, it is respectfully submitted that if the Government of India persuade and pressurize the UAE to meet its obligations under the laws, particularly the ‘International Laws‘. It will obviate a litigation against UAE and generate goodwill in the minds of the Indian citizens, particularly those undertaking enterprises involving substantial investments.

The injustices and cruelties of the authorities of UAE, against the Petitioner, has now crossed an unimaginably long life of ‘Twenty Four’ years! These events have, in turn, destroyed all the potential life span of the Petitioner and there’s no amount of money will ever compensate him for the loss he have suffered!

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir (Petitioner)
Friday 26 Oct, 2018.

Twitter.Com/JabirOrg

WWW.UAE.JABIR.NET

Some of the Representations by the ‘Whistle-blower’ that Speaks For Itself!

1) Probably, the First Hate-Crime Charge Filed Against U.A.E. Regime in the History of OHCHR Geneva, Dated 26-12-1996.

Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi, where systematic torture and other forms of unethical and inhuman treatments on prisoners, especially against Indians taken place on a regular basis.

The Union of India has never discharged its duties and has always remained silent against such atrocities surrounded on Indian prisoners in UAE.

The Petitioner took up his case, along with the pleas and sufferings of Thousands of prisoners to the United Nations and others who’re concerned about Human Rights violations worldwide. [Full Text: The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’]

2) ‘Union of India Cannot Extradite its Own Nationals to the U.A.E.!’ – A Representation Towards Extradition Treaty Between India and the UAE, Dated 24-11-1997.

A copy of representation, on the proposed India-UAE Extradition Treaty, was handed over to the then President of India, Shri K.R.Narayanan, by the ‘Petitioner’.

The Hon’ble President of India was kind enough to use his discretionary powers and transferred the same to the ‘top bureaucrats’ in South Block, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Both, India and the UAE had ultimately signed the treaty but Union of India cannot extradite its own nationals to the country in question under this treaty which came into force in 2000.

This particular clause applied to the ‘Extradition Treaty’ that a state does not have any obligation to surrender its own citizen, not only helped a majority of Indian migrants of UAE from false accusations and warrants but also relieved the Indian Courts from wasting precious time. [Full Text: India-UAE Extradition Treaty, A Flashback & The Recognitions of A Representation-1997]

3) Strategy Formulation and Implementation of ‘Reparation Mechanisms’ Between India and the GCC countries, Dated 25-01-2013

‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ – Strategy Formulation and Implementation of a Mutual Human Rights Law and Reparation Mechanisms Between the Government of India and the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries, mandating our elected representatives and officials to eliminate discrimination and imbalances of Non-resident Indians (NRIs) working in different countries. This also involves the recognition and protection of the dignity and respect of individuals. [Read: Summary of Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms]

VISIT TIMELINE: INDO-GULF REPARATION MECHANISMS

GLOBAL CAMPAIGN!

‘Judgment For Sale’ (Court Judgments are not worthless piece of papers) As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the ‘Decree Holder’ has the right to offer his Judgment for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity. …Why do we sell the UAE Judgments?

Global Campaign
“Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”

Reference Links 

• “The Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE”!
• “Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud”!
• ‘“The Gravest Injustice Towards An Indian Investor In UAE – Open Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Minister for External Affairs, Govt. of India!
• “A Set of UAE Judgments was Unpaid, remained Unexecuted for the last 22 years! Both the Governments, the Government of India and the UAE Federation are Playing with Fire!”
• ‘“Thanks to State Department Cables, a U.S.Torture Victim Won a Rare $10 Million Settlement against UAE ruling family” – The condition: ‘Silence in the Press’!
• ‘Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!
• ‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’
• ‘The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’
• India’s Extradition Treaty With United Arab Emirates (UAE), The Worst Human Rights Abusers! – ‘A Flashback & The Recognition of Representation-1997′
• UAE Fraud: In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for the law abiding citizens!
• Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

Link To Articles

The Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE

Kochi, 12th May, 2018

Download the Authentic Mail to the Mission in Abu Dhabi, in regards with the “Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE”, in PDF (Size: 420 kb)

 From

Panikkaveetil K. Jabir (Petitioner)
501, Metro Plaza Building, Market Road,
Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala Pin. 682 018.

To

Mr. Dinesh Kumar,
First Secretary (Community Affairs and Economic & Commerce),
Embassy of India, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Ref. No.G/202/05/2017 dated 29-4-2018   &  Ref. No. G-202/05/2017 Dated 02/04/2018

Sub. The Settlement of ‘Non-Execution of Court-Judgments, Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other Offenses in UAE

Respected Sir,

The Embassy can persuade UAE to settle this case of ‘Non-Execution of a set of UAE Court-Judgments, the guilty of Contempt of Courts, Embezzlement of Funds, Defrauding’ and other offenses pending before the Indian Authorities and UAE itself for about quarter of a century.

Mission in Abu Dhabi may suggest a settlement on the terms herein below, suggested tentatively

(a) an interim relief, followed by (b) final settlement:

The action required by the Mission is initially to bring the offenders before justice, for the damages the Petitioner, an Abu Dhabi based Indian Investor, contractor and supplier, has sustained under the various counts including repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, brutal tortures, extortion, framing him false case and arbitrary detention, violating ‘Four Judgments of the UAE Courts’ in his favour, the guilty of ‘Contempt of Courts and the like.

Allow the Petitioner (Judgement Creditor) all the benefits ordered therein, which he had been deprived unjustly and illegally, including making the best of all his lost business assets and pay him the interim relief pending final settlement of the case.

The petitioner suggests:

(a) Interim Relief – an immediate payment

Having regard to the serious nature of the losses and injuries inflicted upon the Petitioner and resultant deprivation of his assets and other rights and privileges, damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities etc., he is entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

(b) Final Settlement – full payment

Compensation for violation of Human Rights, like illegal incarceration, inhuman tortures (even like ruthless beating, pulling off his nails, torturing his brother in front of him etc.) violation of disobeying the Judicial verdicts of Courts in UAE, on four different types and stages, committed acts such as fraud in connection with Petitioner’s deportation denying his property, fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of his human dignity, a continuing offence of prolonging the agony and anguish of the Petitioner now exceeding 22 years.

The right to live with dignity and personal liberty are guaranteed by the Constitution of India under Article 21 which reads as follows:- ‘No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law’.

There cannot be any doubt or dispute about the averments of the ‘Judgment Creditor’, all the claims he had made, as they are fully supported by the orders of Courts both the countries, and the official documents of the governments of India and UAE. The restoration of business loss, the loss of assets and investments of the petitioner while he was under arbitrary detention in UAE, was an active part of the Court Judgments, which the petitioner had been deprived unjustly and illegally.

The Petitioner, as a Judgment Creditor, is legally entitled for his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was fraudulently deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.  This deprivation of property of the Petitioner will tantamount to violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the non-implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.).  The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner, who had always remained a ‘non-offender’ by all means (A declaration in the final Judgment by the Apex Court of UAE reads as follows:- ‘All the evidences indicates to the properness of the behaviour of the Petitioner’) for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as a result of the unjust and illegal actions of the UAE authorities.

The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to many hundred millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, for a settlement by known legal methods of arbitration by a mutually agreed authority or approaching the ‘International Court of Justice’ (ICJ) for advisory opinions as regards to the quantum of compensation.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, as well as to the UAE Ambassador to India, dated 28th Feb, 2018.

This is a racially motivated hate crime with assignments of tasks such as extortion, outright fraud etc., by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower contract in 1995 against a local Emirati (an associate of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’).

The Petitioner was entirely involved as an instrumental part of the UAE’s progressing economy [1979 – 1996] with an enviable business empire of Engineering, Trading & General Contracting, 3 different establishments with all sort of infrastructure including warehouses, fully equipped Electro-mechanical lab, workshop, staff quarters and other real estate investments etc., worth US$100 million apart from work contracts and reputation, with his prime years, commanding respect of many of his clients and well wishers in the region.

The offenders were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office in day light. The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner terribly, and robbed of money and valuables worth .4 million US Dollars, at the instance of the local Emirati for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him.

The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the callous policemen and was kept them isolated in hellholes in different detention centers, before taking him to the notorious Al Wathba Central Prison, and brutally tortured and traumatized. He was continued under detention arbitrarily under squalid conditions, often solitary confinement, in order to humiliate or degrade him and was inaccessible by any of his staff or counsels and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

As a police state,  under a military ruler, the state police struggled hard almost seven months to fabricate false evidence, after framing charges against the Petitioner while keeping him incarcerated, but they completely failed in front of Jurors. The police dropped charges framed against the Petitioner and plead guilty in the Legal Court after an investigation orders passed against Abu Dhabi policemen.

The investigation order was also approved by the highest Appellate Full-Court. The conduct of the Prosecutor too was condemned. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute favour of the petitioner including the order for immediate release of petitioner with compensation for all his sufferings illegally inflicted upon him and to restore other rights and privileges.

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, by deporting him from UAE, thus to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to the Government of India (after approaching the Supreme Court) to the enforcement of UAE Judgments. The Government of India has colluded with UAE and betrayed, mentally tortured and abandoned the ‘Judgment Creditor’ for the last 22 years that followed, only to deny him justice, thus, defaming the Judicial organs of both the countries.

The Embassy is duty bound to act in accordance with the Constitution, laws, generally accepted rules of international law and ratified international treaties such as Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963 &  Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) 1961.

We were over-excited and rather too fast to support Devyani Khobragade, an Indian diplomat, indicted for visa fraud in the U.S. Court and we were on the same footing to support Kulbhushan Jadhav, an ex-Naval officer, convicted in a Pak Military Court on the charge of spying.

As you know, Khobragade’s arrest in U.S. that led to a diplomatic standoff between the two nations. All activities were interrupted or turned upside down, as a world we have never seen it before. Even bulldozers were pressed into service to remove security barriers outside the US Embassy in Delhi.

In Kulbhushan Jadhav’s case, India has moved the ICJ under Article 36(1) of the Court’s statute. This provision is independent of the compulsory jurisdiction norm and relies on treaties in which both countries accept the Court’s jurisdiction.

It is inconceivable that when anti-social elements hatch a conspiracy and attempt virtual destruction of a continued life, the violators of law in the State are protected by the UAE administration. The situation cannot be allowed to pass unnoticed by a responsible and civilized Governments in India, when the facts and files establish such wanton violations of Human Rights against a citizen. The injustices and cruelties by the UAE administration, against the ‘Judgment Creditor’, remains a serious case with highest credibility over any other case in India for the World Court.

‘The US Authority was keen and honest to take up the case of its citizen with the UAE government and the claim was settled just in 3 years’. The U.S. Human Rights Lawsuit against Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan is a living example of successful foreign relations among responsible States who value the dignity of its citizens’.

On the other hand, the Government of India did an unpardonable mistake of dragging the most legitimate case of an Indian investor and trader in UAE for a long period of 22 years to date, despite a portfolio of six legal judgments from different Courts against the perpetrators, the Executive of Abu Dhabi, UAE, who are also accountable for the guilty of ‘Contempt of Courts’.

The Embassy may indicate to UAE that the publication of details of violation of Investor’s Rights in UAE, concern over the disregard for Court orders, contempt of Court, defrauding Judgment creditors etc., will undoubtedly hamper UAE’s goal to attract foreign direct investments (FDI), further operation of ‘quality investing’ in India, particularly having regard to the force of social media (Utmost restraint has been practiced by the petitioner hitherto).

The Embassy can persuade UAE to settle the matter amicably, without any delay whatever. The time is extended for reaching an amicable settlement with UAE or at least an interim payment till 31-05-2018.

All the relevant records had been made available to the Govt. of India, many times, the latest being on 12th April, 2018, however, a set of those documents are attached herewith afresh, for your ready reference.

The petitioner, the undersigned, remain yours in good faith,

Thanking you,

Yours truly,
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir (Petitioner)

Encl:

Your letter dated 29-04-2018 with all relevant documents

Copy to:

Mr. Bimal Saigal,
Consultant (Gulf), The Ministry of External Affairs,
Patiala House, New Delhi – 110 001.

CASE [TIMELINE] EXHIBITS: http://www.uae.jabir.net/

Open Letter to H.E. Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration

20th April, 2018 New Delhi.

‘OPEN LETTER TO H.E. JAMAL HUSSAIN AL ZAABI, THE CONSULAR GENERAL OF THE UAE, UAE CONSULATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD BY THE UAE ADMINISTRATION’

Download the Authentic  Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, in PDF (Size: 530 kb)

From
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],
M/S. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, 501, Metro Plaza Building,
Market Road, Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018.

To
H.E. Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi,
The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala – 695 009.

Sub. “Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts &
Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration”

His Excellency,

This ‘Open Letter’ is a reminder of the previous letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India, Dated 28th Feb, 2018. Full text.

The Petitioner is forwarding herewith a copy of his latest representation to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, dated 09th Feb-2018 for redressal of sufferings and deprivation of all his Rights and assets consequent on his fraudulent and inhuman deportation from the UAE in the year 1996 over-riding the fact that 4 successive Judgments in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts, finding the UAE officials guilty of the most heinous crimes against him.

The petitioner was closely associated with the Private Departments of (Late) H,H.Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, from 1982 onwards, the then Emir of Abu Dhabi and also the President of United Arab Emirates, H.H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who succeeded Sheikh Zayed as ruler and many others in the ruling family. He had registrations with all the major Oil & Gas Companies on behalf of his firms General Contracting & Trading Est., with all mandatory Governmental Licences, for bidding/tendering/projects/participations etc., and contributed much to the developments of Abu Dhabi Emirate. The petitioner was one of the first India-born real estate investors in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which is a multi-trillion US dollar industry today.

This is a case of personal and racially aggravated attack with malicious motives by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, in collaboration with Police, to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower  contract  in 1995,  which involves extortion, trespassing, inhuman torture, illegal detention,  criminal conspiracy and fraud against an Indian investor.

[The following part was a significant turning point in this case, it also exposes the deplorable state of affairs in the Administration of Abu Dhabi Police, during the period of the petitioner’s case; in the year 1995].

“In the instant case, the Abu Dhabi policemen did their atrocious acts towards the petitioner in a terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office. Thereby they already lost their face.

The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner so horribly, worse than death, at the instance of the local Emirati  (the friend of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’) for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him. The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the policemen and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

The Criminal Court found the offenders (A group of policemen and the local Emirati) were guilty and, therefore, passed orders to investigate the crime committed by them. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute in favour of the petitioner including the highest Court of Abu Dhabi, against the culprits”.

An excerpt from the Apex Court Judgment reads as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment, 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates).

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the Judgment-debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

After arriving India in 1996, the petitioner had submitted very many representations to your Excellency, as a respondent in the case, detailing his inordinate sufferings due to the patent violations of Human Rights perpetrated against him by your country. Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to you (after approaching the Supreme Court) to settle the case.  A period of twenty two years is passed by till date, but there was no response/acknowledgement was received to any of them.

The Petitioner is yet to receive any relief from the country you are privileged to represent in India.  In recent times, the scenario  in legal area has changed entirely.  That a citizen of any country can seek relief from another country (including UAE) has been established, and also acquiesced in by UAE.

The issue of summons to the UAE Ambassador in America, in a Civil Suit instituted in 2009 in a U.S. District Court against UAE (against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family, who were accused of roles in the abduction and torture) has led to this important development.  Though the charges and jurisdiction of American Court were questioned initially by UAE, it was conceded as evidenced by settlement reached in between the U.S. citizen and UAE.  It is, therefore, open to Indian Courts or authorities to give relief to a person in India, to sue your Government as well in the light of the legal development.

In the present case, UAE Government has additionally made investments in various parts of India.  Your Government is also engaging in trading and commercial activities worth billions of US dollars.  UAE owns properties in the State of Kerala as well.

Before instituting a Suit against you and your country in the light of subsequent development, the Petitioner felt, and he was advised by the Legal Cell of the Indian Society of Authors (with a former Judge of Kerala High Court as Chairman), and members like Judges of the Mumbai and Kerala High Courts and other Government Lawyers that,  it would be desirable to appraise you about his intention to file a Suit in Kerala for securing relief overdue.

The Petitioner would certainly like to avoid a legal battle, wasteful and long drawn out. This letter is to request you humbly, to compensate him for the damages he has sustained under the various counts including violation and deprivation of the Human Rights, and torture and for the deprivation of all his businesses, assets and earnings situated in UAE at the time of his illegal deportation.  The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to very many millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, if you could settle his claim, or agree for a settlement by known legal methods including Arbitration as regards quantum of compensation;  Arbitration by a mutually agreed authority.  He would prefer the direct settlement between the parties.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary or punitive damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, towards the price of his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was illegally deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.) The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities, continued up to the deportation and resultant deprivation when he landed in his home land, bereft of any assets whatever.

The (irremediable) damages inflicted on Petitioner by UAE authorities and its far-reaching repercussions:-

Mental distress (by aggravated assault, abduction, detention, extortion, and inhuman torture);

Anguish (resulting from the impact of torture, and deprivation of businesses, investments, company staffs and employees and mental peace of the members of his family and relatives);

Grief (about the state of affairs of himself and the members of his family);

Anxiety (about his own health, ailments, and worries about his staffs, employees and his family) He had to suffer pancreas disorders, heart ailments, compelling him to be an inpatient in hospitals, and continuing to suffer such ailments requiring constant and massive medication;

Vexation (including that caused by the feelings of agony to himself and the members of his family);

Indignation (against the inhumanities of the administration);

Outrage (about the total lack of Rule of Law, and the feeling that even the judiciary is treated with contempt);

Wounded Pride (in the background of the loss of high esteem and dignity he enjoyed in UAE and his homeland India);

Loss of Faith (regarding the petitioner in friends and colleagues and the like. Such persons included businessmen attached to very prestigious investing establishments).

The petitioner  is entitled to compensation for this unique case of  repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, torturing him to near death, and violating ‘Four Judgements of the UAE Courts’ in his favour and the like. Having regard to the serious nature of the loss and injuries suffered and continuing to be suffered, he is also entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

The Petitioner seeks an expeditious remedy, in view of the sufferings undergone by him for a long duration of nearly twenty-two years.  As a founder member of ‘INSA’, (Indian Society of Authors, Kerala Chapter), the Petitioner have already requested ‘INSA’ to offer him assistance through their Legal Cell, and he expect that, the organization and its Legal Cell (with very many former Judges of the High Courts and Subordinate Courts and Senior Lawyers) to help him in the just and equitable cause.

The Petitioner expects a  response and reply before 14th May, 2018.  If there is no response, he will be constrained to resort to legal proceedings, holding you and your country responsible for all the costs and consequences thereof.

Yours faithfully,

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],

Encl:
Ref. Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Hon’ble Minister for External Affairs, dated 09-02-2018.

Open Letter [Main] to:
H.E Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

Open Letter [Copies] to:
1) H.H Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, The President of UAE & Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
2) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai.
3) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.
4) H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of UAE and International Cooperation.
5) H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister of UAE and Minister of the Interior.
6) H.E Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Last Update: 20th April, 2018, New Delhi.

Return to the Legal Cell’s Founder CEO

Visit Case Exhibits: UAE.JABIR.NET

MISSION STATEMENT

Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

CASE LAW   |   RESOURCES   |  SOCIAL MEDIA   |   PUBLICATIONS   |   NEWS ROOM

]]> https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-jamal-hussain-al-zaabi-consular-general-of-uae-consulate-thiruvananthapuram-kerala-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/feed/ 0 no20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.E. JAMAL HUSSAIN AL ZAABI, THE CONSULAR GENERAL OF THE UAE, UAE CONSULATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A... Read more »20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.E. JAMAL HUSSAIN AL ZAABI, THE CONSULAR GENERAL OF THE UAE, UAE CONSULATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A... Read more »Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Executive Branch, Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, Arbitrary Detention in UAE, Fraudulent Regime, Fugitive Debtor UAE, Fugitive From Law, Hackers Middle East, India, India's National Shame, India-UAE Extradition Treaty, India’s Diplomacy, India’s rotten diplomacy, Jabir v. Mohammed Bin Zayed, Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, Judgment Creditor’, Judgment Creditor’s Booklet, Judgment Debtor, Judgment For Sale, Judgments, Malicious Prosecution IN UAE, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Multi-billion Dollars Case, Reparations, Republic Day 2017, Republic Day Black Day, UAE, UAE Ambassador, UAE Armed Force, UAE Constitution, UAE Consulate Kerala, UAE Debt Referral Program, UAE Fraud, UAE Interior Minister, UAE Judgment Equities, UAE's Reputation, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, Willful Defaulters UAE, Year of Zayed, Years of Hope, Consular General of the UAE, Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, UAE Consulate https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-saif-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-minister-of-interior-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/ https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-saif-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-minister-of-interior-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/#comments Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:36:15 +0000 admin http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/?p=1228 Read more »]]>

Open Letter to H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud

20th April, 2018 New Delhi.

‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H LT. GENERAL SHEIKH SAIF BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD’

Download the Authentic  Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, in PDF (Size: 530 kb)

From
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],
M/S. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, 501, Metro Plaza Building,
Market Road, Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018.

To
H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior, United Arab Emirates.

Sub. “Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts &
Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration”

His Highness,

This ‘Open Letter’ is a reminder of the previous letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India, Dated 28th Feb, 2018. Full text.

The Petitioner is forwarding herewith a copy of his latest representation to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, dated 09th Feb-2018 for redressal of sufferings and deprivation of all his Rights and assets consequent on his fraudulent and inhuman deportation from the UAE in the year 1996 over-riding the fact that 4 successive Judgments in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts, finding the UAE officials guilty of the most heinous crimes against him.

The petitioner was closely associated with the Private Departments of (Late) H,H.Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, from 1982 onwards, the then Emir of Abu Dhabi and also the President of United Arab Emirates, H.H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who succeeded Sheikh Zayed as ruler and many others in the ruling family. He had registrations with all the major Oil & Gas Companies on behalf of his firms General Contracting & Trading Est., with all mandatory Governmental Licences, for bidding/tendering/projects/participations etc., and contributed much to the developments of Abu Dhabi Emirate. The petitioner was one of the first India-born real estate investors in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which is a multi-trillion US dollar industry today.

This is a case of personal and racially aggravated attack with malicious motives by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, in collaboration with Police, to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower  contract  in 1995,  which involves extortion, trespassing, inhuman torture, illegal detention,  criminal conspiracy and fraud against an Indian investor.

[The following part was a significant turning point in this case, it also exposes the deplorable state of affairs in the Administration of Abu Dhabi Police, during the period of the petitioner’s case; in the year 1995].

“In the instant case, the Abu Dhabi policemen did their atrocious acts towards the petitioner in a terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office. Thereby they already lost their face.

The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner so horribly, worse than death, at the instance of the local Emirati  (the friend of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’) for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him. The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the policemen and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

The Criminal Court found the offenders (A group of policemen and the local Emirati) were guilty and, therefore, passed orders to investigate the crime committed by them. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute in favour of the petitioner including the highest Court of Abu Dhabi, against the culprits”.

An excerpt from the Apex Court Judgment reads as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment, 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates).

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the Judgment-debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

After arriving India in 1996, the petitioner had submitted very many representations to your Excellency, as a respondent in the case, detailing his inordinate sufferings due to the patent violations of Human Rights perpetrated against him by your country. Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to you (after approaching the Supreme Court) to settle the case.  A period of twenty two years is passed by till date, but there was no response/acknowledgement was received to any of them.

The Petitioner is yet to receive any relief from the country you are privileged to represent in India.  In recent times, the scenario  in legal area has changed entirely.  That a citizen of any country can seek relief from another country (including UAE) has been established, and also acquiesced in by UAE.

The issue of summons to the UAE Ambassador in America, in a Civil Suit instituted in 2009 in a U.S. District Court against UAE (against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family, who were accused of roles in the abduction and torture) has led to this important development.  Though the charges and jurisdiction of American Court were questioned initially by UAE, it was conceded as evidenced by settlement reached in between the U.S. citizen and UAE.  It is, therefore, open to Indian Courts or authorities to give relief to a person in India, to sue your Government as well in the light of the legal development.

In the present case, UAE Government has additionally made investments in various parts of India.  Your Government is also engaging in trading and commercial activities worth billions of US dollars.  UAE owns properties in the State of Kerala as well.

Before instituting a Suit against you and your country in the light of subsequent development, the Petitioner felt, and he was advised by the Legal Cell of the Indian Society of Authors (with a former Judge of Kerala High Court as Chairman), and members like Judges of the Mumbai and Kerala High Courts and other Government Lawyers that,  it would be desirable to appraise you about his intention to file a Suit in Kerala for securing relief overdue.

The Petitioner would certainly like to avoid a legal battle, wasteful and long drawn out. This letter is to request you humbly, to compensate him for the damages he has sustained under the various counts including violation and deprivation of the Human Rights, and torture and for the deprivation of all his businesses, assets and earnings situated in UAE at the time of his illegal deportation.  The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to very many millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, if you could settle his claim, or agree for a settlement by known legal methods including Arbitration as regards quantum of compensation;  Arbitration by a mutually agreed authority.  He would prefer the direct settlement between the parties.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary or punitive damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, towards the price of his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was illegally deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.) The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities, continued up to the deportation and resultant deprivation when he landed in his home land, bereft of any assets whatever.

The (irremediable) damages inflicted on Petitioner by UAE authorities and its far-reaching repercussions:-

Mental distress (by aggravated assault, abduction, detention, extortion, and inhuman torture);

Anguish (resulting from the impact of torture, and deprivation of businesses, investments, company staffs and employees and mental peace of the members of his family and relatives);

Grief (about the state of affairs of himself and the members of his family);

Anxiety (about his own health, ailments, and worries about his staffs, employees and his family) He had to suffer pancreas disorders, heart ailments, compelling him to be an inpatient in hospitals, and continuing to suffer such ailments requiring constant and massive medication;

Vexation (including that caused by the feelings of agony to himself and the members of his family);

Indignation (against the inhumanities of the administration);

Outrage (about the total lack of Rule of Law, and the feeling that even the judiciary is treated with contempt);

Wounded Pride (in the background of the loss of high esteem and dignity he enjoyed in UAE and his homeland India);

Loss of Faith (regarding the petitioner in friends and colleagues and the like. Such persons included businessmen attached to very prestigious investing establishments).

The petitioner  is entitled to compensation for this unique case of  repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, torturing him to near death, and violating ‘Four Judgements of the UAE Courts’ in his favour and the like. Having regard to the serious nature of the loss and injuries suffered and continuing to be suffered, he is also entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

The Petitioner seeks an expeditious remedy, in view of the sufferings undergone by him for a long duration of nearly twenty-two years.  As a founder member of ‘INSA’, (Indian Society of Authors, Kerala Chapter), the Petitioner have already requested ‘INSA’ to offer him assistance through their Legal Cell, and he expect that, the organization and its Legal Cell (with very many former Judges of the High Courts and Subordinate Courts and Senior Lawyers) to help him in the just and equitable cause.

The Petitioner expects a  response and reply before 14th May, 2018.  If there is no response, he will be constrained to resort to legal proceedings, holding you and your country responsible for all the costs and consequences thereof.

Yours faithfully,

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],

Encl:
Ref. Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Hon’ble Minister for External Affairs, dated 09-02-2018.

Open Letter [Main] to:
H.E Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

Open Letter [Copies] to:
1) H.H Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, The President of UAE & Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
2) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai.
3) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.
4) H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of UAE and International Cooperation.
5) H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister of UAE and Minister of the Interior.
6) H.E Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Last Update: 20th April, 2018, New Delhi.

Return to the Legal Cell’s Founder CEO

Visit Case Exhibits: UAE.JABIR.NET

MISSION STATEMENT

Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

CASE LAW   |   RESOURCES   |   PUBLICATIONS   |   NEWS ROOM

]]> https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-saif-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-minister-of-interior-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/feed/ 0 no20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H LT. GENERAL SHEIKH SAIF BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT... Read more »20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H LT. GENERAL SHEIKH SAIF BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT... Read more »Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Executive Branch, Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, Arbitrary Detention in UAE, Cheating Scandals UAE, Deprivation of Liberty in UAE, Dubai, Extortion Abu Dhabi, Fraudulent Regime, Fugitive Debtor UAE, Fugitive From Law, Government of India, Human Rights, Human Rights Council, India's National Shame, India-UAE Extradition Treaty, India’s Diplomacy, India’s rotten diplomacy, Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms, International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court, International Treaty Laws, Jabir v. Mohammed Bin Zayed, Judgment Creditor’, Judgment Creditor’s Booklet, Judgment Debtor, Judgment For Sale, Judgments, Malicious Prosecution IN UAE, Multi-billion Dollars Case, Open Letter to UAE Ruler, P.K.Jabir, Pakistan, Republic Day 2017, Republic Day Black Day, Shaikh Saif Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, UAE, UAE Ambassador, UAE Constitution, UAE Debt Referral Program, UAE Fraud, UAE Interior Minister, UAE Judgment Equities, UAE's Reputation, Willful Defaulters UAE, Year of Zayed, Years of Hope, Open Letter to Sheikh Saif, Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-abdullah-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-minister-of-foreign-affairs-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/ https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-abdullah-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-minister-of-foreign-affairs-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/#comments Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:19:31 +0000 admin http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/?p=1212 Read more »]]>

Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud

20th April, 2018 New Delhi.

‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH ABDULLAH BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD’

Download the Authentic  Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, in PDF (Size: 530 kb)

From
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],
M/S. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, 501, Metro Plaza Building,
Market Road, Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018.

To
H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan,
UAE Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, United Arab Emirates.

Sub. “Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts &
Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration”

His Highness,

This ‘Open Letter’ is a reminder of the previous letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India, Dated 28th Feb, 2018. Full text.

The Petitioner is forwarding herewith a copy of his latest representation to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, dated 09th Feb-2018 for redressal of sufferings and deprivation of all his Rights and assets consequent on his fraudulent and inhuman deportation from the UAE in the year 1996 over-riding the fact that 4 successive Judgments in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts, finding the UAE officials guilty of the most heinous crimes against him.

The petitioner was closely associated with the Private Departments of (Late) H,H.Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, from 1982 onwards, the then Emir of Abu Dhabi and also the President of United Arab Emirates, H.H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who succeeded Sheikh Zayed as ruler and many others in the ruling family. He had registrations with all the major Oil & Gas Companies on behalf of his firms General Contracting & Trading Est., with all mandatory Governmental Licences, for bidding/tendering/projects/participations etc., and contributed much to the developments of Abu Dhabi Emirate. The petitioner was one of the first India-born real estate investors in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which is a multi-trillion US dollar industry today.

This is a case of personal and racially aggravated attack with malicious motives by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, in collaboration with Police, to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower  contract  in 1995,  which involves extortion, trespassing, inhuman torture, illegal detention,  criminal conspiracy and fraud against an Indian investor.

[The following part was a significant turning point in this case, it also exposes the deplorable state of affairs in the Administration of Abu Dhabi Police, during the period of the petitioner’s case; in the year 1995].

“In the instant case, the Abu Dhabi policemen did their atrocious acts towards the petitioner in a terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office. Thereby they already lost their face.

The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner so horribly, worse than death, at the instance of the local Emirati  (the friend of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’) for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him. The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the policemen and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

The Criminal Court found the offenders (A group of policemen and the local Emirati) were guilty and, therefore, passed orders to investigate the crime committed by them. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute in favour of the petitioner including the highest Court of Abu Dhabi, against the culprits”.

An excerpt from the Apex Court Judgment reads as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment, 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates).

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the Judgment-debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

After arriving India in 1996, the petitioner had submitted very many representations to your Excellency, as a respondent in the case, detailing his inordinate sufferings due to the patent violations of Human Rights perpetrated against him by your country. Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to you (after approaching the Supreme Court) to settle the case.  A period of twenty two years is passed by till date, but there was no response/acknowledgement was received to any of them.

The Petitioner is yet to receive any relief from the country you are privileged to represent in India.  In recent times, the scenario  in legal area has changed entirely.  That a citizen of any country can seek relief from another country (including UAE) has been established, and also acquiesced in by UAE.

The issue of summons to the UAE Ambassador in America, in a Civil Suit instituted in 2009 in a U.S. District Court against UAE (against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family, who were accused of roles in the abduction and torture) has led to this important development.  Though the charges and jurisdiction of American Court were questioned initially by UAE, it was conceded as evidenced by settlement reached in between the U.S. citizen and UAE.  It is, therefore, open to Indian Courts or authorities to give relief to a person in India, to sue your Government as well in the light of the legal development.

In the present case, UAE Government has additionally made investments in various parts of India.  Your Government is also engaging in trading and commercial activities worth billions of US dollars.  UAE owns properties in the State of Kerala as well.

Before instituting a Suit against you and your country in the light of subsequent development, the Petitioner felt, and he was advised by the Legal Cell of the Indian Society of Authors (with a former Judge of Kerala High Court as Chairman), and members like Judges of the Mumbai and Kerala High Courts and other Government Lawyers that,  it would be desirable to appraise you about his intention to file a Suit in Kerala for securing relief overdue.

The Petitioner would certainly like to avoid a legal battle, wasteful and long drawn out. This letter is to request you humbly, to compensate him for the damages he has sustained under the various counts including violation and deprivation of the Human Rights, and torture and for the deprivation of all his businesses, assets and earnings situated in UAE at the time of his illegal deportation.  The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to very many millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, if you could settle his claim, or agree for a settlement by known legal methods including Arbitration as regards quantum of compensation;  Arbitration by a mutually agreed authority.  He would prefer the direct settlement between the parties.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary or punitive damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, towards the price of his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was illegally deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.) The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities, continued up to the deportation and resultant deprivation when he landed in his home land, bereft of any assets whatever.

The (irremediable) damages inflicted on Petitioner by UAE authorities and its far-reaching repercussions:-

Mental distress (by aggravated assault, abduction, detention, extortion, and inhuman torture);

Anguish (resulting from the impact of torture, and deprivation of businesses, investments, company staffs and employees and mental peace of the members of his family and relatives);

Grief (about the state of affairs of himself and the members of his family);

Anxiety (about his own health, ailments, and worries about his staffs, employees and his family) He had to suffer pancreas disorders, heart ailments, compelling him to be an inpatient in hospitals, and continuing to suffer such ailments requiring constant and massive medication;

Vexation (including that caused by the feelings of agony to himself and the members of his family);

Indignation (against the inhumanities of the administration);

Outrage (about the total lack of Rule of Law, and the feeling that even the judiciary is treated with contempt);

Wounded Pride (in the background of the loss of high esteem and dignity he enjoyed in UAE and his homeland India);

Loss of Faith (regarding the petitioner in friends and colleagues and the like. Such persons included businessmen attached to very prestigious investing establishments).

The petitioner  is entitled to compensation for this unique case of  repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, torturing him to near death, and violating ‘Four Judgements of the UAE Courts’ in his favour and the like. Having regard to the serious nature of the loss and injuries suffered and continuing to be suffered, he is also entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

The Petitioner seeks an expeditious remedy, in view of the sufferings undergone by him for a long duration of nearly twenty-two years.  As a founder member of ‘INSA’, (Indian Society of Authors, Kerala Chapter), the Petitioner have already requested ‘INSA’ to offer him assistance through their Legal Cell, and he expect that, the organization and its Legal Cell (with very many former Judges of the High Courts and Subordinate Courts and Senior Lawyers) to help him in the just and equitable cause.

The Petitioner expects a  response and reply before 14th May, 2018.  If there is no response, he will be constrained to resort to legal proceedings, holding you and your country responsible for all the costs and consequences thereof.

Yours faithfully,

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],

Encl:
Ref. Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Hon’ble Minister for External Affairs, dated 09-02-2018.

Open Letter [Main] to:
H.E Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

Open Letter [Copies] to:
1) H.H Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, The President of UAE & Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
2) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai.
3) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.
4) H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of UAE and International Cooperation.
5) H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister of UAE and Minister of the Interior.
6) H.E Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Last Update: 20th April, 2018, New Delhi.

Return to the Legal Cell’s Founder CEO

Visit Case Exhibits: UAE.JABIR.NET

MISSION STATEMENT

Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

CASE LAW   |   RESOURCES   |  SOCIAL MEDIA   |   PUBLICATIONS   |   NEWS ROOM

]]> https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-abdullah-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-minister-of-foreign-affairs-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/feed/ 0 no20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH ABDULLAH BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET... Read more »20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH ABDULLAH BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET... Read more »Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Executive Branch, Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, Arbitrary Detention in UAE, Delhi High Court, Deprivation of Liberty in UAE, Extortion Abu Dhabi, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Regime, Fugitive Debtor UAE, Fugitive From Law, Human Rights, Human Rights Council, Shaikh Saif Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations, United States, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, White Paper, Willful Defaulters UAE, Year of Zayed, Years of Hope, Open Letter, Open Letter to UAE Foreign Minister, Open Letter to UAE Rulers, Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-mohammed-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-crown-prince-of-abu-dhabi-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/ https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-mohammed-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-crown-prince-of-abu-dhabi-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/#comments Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:22:11 +0000 admin http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/?p=1203 Read more »]]>

Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud

20th April, 2018 New Delhi.

‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, CROWN PRINCE OF ABU DHABI AND DEPUTY SUPREME COMMANDER OF THE UAE ARMED FORCES, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD’

Download the Authentic  Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, in PDF (Size: 530 kb)

From
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],
M/S. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, 501, Metro Plaza Building,
Market Road, Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018.

To
H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan,
Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander -
of the UAE Armed Forces.

Sub. “Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts &
Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration”

His Highness,

This ‘Open Letter’ is a reminder of the previous letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India, Dated 28th Feb, 2018. Full text.

The Petitioner is forwarding herewith a copy of his latest representation to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, dated 09th Feb-2018 for redressal of sufferings and deprivation of all his Rights and assets consequent on his fraudulent and inhuman deportation from the UAE in the year 1996 over-riding the fact that 4 successive Judgments in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts, finding the UAE officials guilty of the most heinous crimes against him.

The petitioner was closely associated with the Private Departments of (Late) H,H.Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, from 1982 onwards, the then Emir of Abu Dhabi and also the President of United Arab Emirates, H.H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who succeeded Sheikh Zayed as ruler and many others in the ruling family. He had registrations with all the major Oil & Gas Companies on behalf of his firms General Contracting & Trading Est., with all mandatory Governmental Licences, for bidding/tendering/projects/participations etc., and contributed much to the developments of Abu Dhabi Emirate. The petitioner was one of the first India-born real estate investors in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which is a multi-trillion US dollar industry today.

This is a case of personal and racially aggravated attack with malicious motives by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, in collaboration with Police, to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower  contract  in 1995,  which involves extortion, trespassing, inhuman torture, illegal detention,  criminal conspiracy and fraud against an Indian investor.

[The following part was a significant turning point in this case, it also exposes the deplorable state of affairs in the Administration of Abu Dhabi Police, during the period of the petitioner’s case; in the year 1995].

“In the instant case, the Abu Dhabi policemen did their atrocious acts towards the petitioner in a terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office. Thereby they already lost their face.

The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner so horribly, worse than death, at the instance of the local Emirati  (the friend of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’) for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him. The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the policemen and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

The Criminal Court found the offenders (A group of policemen and the local Emirati) were guilty and, therefore, passed orders to investigate the crime committed by them. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute in favour of the petitioner including the highest Court of Abu Dhabi, against the culprits”.

An excerpt from the Apex Court Judgment reads as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment, 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates).

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the Judgment-debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

After arriving India in 1996, the petitioner had submitted very many representations to your Excellency, as a respondent in the case, detailing his inordinate sufferings due to the patent violations of Human Rights perpetrated against him by your country. Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to you (after approaching the Supreme Court) to settle the case.  A period of twenty two years is passed by till date, but there was no response/acknowledgement was received to any of them.

The Petitioner is yet to receive any relief from the country you are privileged to represent in India.  In recent times, the scenario  in legal area has changed entirely.  That a citizen of any country can seek relief from another country (including UAE) has been established, and also acquiesced in by UAE.

The issue of summons to the UAE Ambassador in America, in a Civil Suit instituted in 2009 in a U.S. District Court against UAE (against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family, who were accused of roles in the abduction and torture) has led to this important development.  Though the charges and jurisdiction of American Court were questioned initially by UAE, it was conceded as evidenced by settlement reached in between the U.S. citizen and UAE.  It is, therefore, open to Indian Courts or authorities to give relief to a person in India, to sue your Government as well in the light of the legal development.

In the present case, UAE Government has additionally made investments in various parts of India.  Your Government is also engaging in trading and commercial activities worth billions of US dollars.  UAE owns properties in the State of Kerala as well.

Before instituting a Suit against you and your country in the light of subsequent development, the Petitioner felt, and he was advised by the Legal Cell of the Indian Society of Authors (with a former Judge of Kerala High Court as Chairman), and members like Judges of the Mumbai and Kerala High Courts and other Government Lawyers that,  it would be desirable to appraise you about his intention to file a Suit in Kerala for securing relief overdue.

The Petitioner would certainly like to avoid a legal battle, wasteful and long drawn out. This letter is to request you humbly, to compensate him for the damages he has sustained under the various counts including violation and deprivation of the Human Rights, and torture and for the deprivation of all his businesses, assets and earnings situated in UAE at the time of his illegal deportation.  The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to very many millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, if you could settle his claim, or agree for a settlement by known legal methods including Arbitration as regards quantum of compensation;  Arbitration by a mutually agreed authority.  He would prefer the direct settlement between the parties.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary or punitive damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, towards the price of his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was illegally deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.) The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities, continued up to the deportation and resultant deprivation when he landed in his home land, bereft of any assets whatever.

The (irremediable) damages inflicted on Petitioner by UAE authorities and its far-reaching repercussions:-

Mental distress (by aggravated assault, abduction, detention, extortion, and inhuman torture);

Anguish (resulting from the impact of torture, and deprivation of businesses, investments, company staffs and employees and mental peace of the members of his family and relatives);

Grief (about the state of affairs of himself and the members of his family);

Anxiety (about his own health, ailments, and worries about his staffs, employees and his family) He had to suffer pancreas disorders, heart ailments, compelling him to be an inpatient in hospitals, and continuing to suffer such ailments requiring constant and massive medication;

Vexation (including that caused by the feelings of agony to himself and the members of his family);

Indignation (against the inhumanities of the administration);

Outrage (about the total lack of Rule of Law, and the feeling that even the judiciary is treated with contempt);

Wounded Pride (in the background of the loss of high esteem and dignity he enjoyed in UAE and his homeland India);

Loss of Faith (regarding the petitioner in friends and colleagues and the like. Such persons included businessmen attached to very prestigious investing establishments).

The petitioner  is entitled to compensation for this unique case of  repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, torturing him to near death, and violating ‘Four Judgements of the UAE Courts’ in his favour and the like. Having regard to the serious nature of the loss and injuries suffered and continuing to be suffered, he is also entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

The Petitioner seeks an expeditious remedy, in view of the sufferings undergone by him for a long duration of nearly twenty-two years.  As a founder member of ‘INSA’, (Indian Society of Authors, Kerala Chapter), the Petitioner have already requested ‘INSA’ to offer him assistance through their Legal Cell, and he expect that, the organization and its Legal Cell (with very many former Judges of the High Courts and Subordinate Courts and Senior Lawyers) to help him in the just and equitable cause.

The Petitioner expects a  response and reply before 14th May, 2018.  If there is no response, he will be constrained to resort to legal proceedings, holding you and your country responsible for all the costs and consequences thereof.

Yours faithfully,

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],

Encl:
Ref. Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Hon’ble Minister for External Affairs, dated 09-02-2018.

Open Letter [Main] to:
H.E Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

Open Letter [Copies] to:
1) H.H Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, The President of UAE & Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
2) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai.
3) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.
4) H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of UAE and International Cooperation.
5) H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister of UAE and Minister of the Interior.
6) H.E Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Last Update: 20th April, 2018, New Delhi.

Return to the Legal Cell’s Founder CEO

Visit Case Exhibits: UAE.JABIR.NET

MISSION STATEMENT

Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

CASE LAW   |   RESOURCES   |   PUBLICATIONS   |  SOCIAL MEDIA   |   NEWS ROOM

]]> https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-mohammed-bin-zayed-al-nahyan-crown-prince-of-abu-dhabi-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/feed/ 0 no20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, CROWN PRINCE OF ABU DHABI AND DEPUTY SUPREME COMMANDER OF THE UAE ARMED FORCES, TO... Read more »20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN ZAYED AL NAHYAN, CROWN PRINCE OF ABU DHABI AND DEPUTY SUPREME COMMANDER OF THE UAE ARMED FORCES, TO... Read more »Abu Dhabi, Arbitrary Detention in UAE, Blackwater, Cheating Scandals UAE, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Delhi High Court, Deprivation of Liberty in UAE, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Regime, Fugitive Debtor UAE, Fugitive From Law, Government of India, Human Rights, India, India's National Shame, India-UAE Extradition Treaty, India’s Diplomacy, India’s rotten diplomacy, Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms, International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court, Jabir v. Mohammed Bin Zayed, Judgment Creditor’, Judgment Creditor’s Booklet, Judgment Debtor, Judgment For Sale, Judgments, Malicious Prosecution IN UAE, Mercenary Armies, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Open Letter to UAE Ruler, P.K.Jabir, Reparations, Republic Day 2017, Republic Day Black Day, Shaikh Saif Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, UAE, UAE Ambassador, UAE Armed Force, UAE Constitution, UAE Debt Referral Program, UAE Fraud, UAE Interior Minister, UAE Judgment Equities, UAE's Reputation, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations, United States, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, Open Letter, UAE Criminals, UAE Human Rights, UAE Judgments For Sale!, UAE Law https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-mohammed-bin-rashid-prime-minister-of-uae-and-ruler-of-dubai-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/ https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-mohammed-bin-rashid-prime-minister-of-uae-and-ruler-of-dubai-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/#comments Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:00:24 +0000 admin http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/?p=1192 Read more »]]>

Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud

20th April, 2018 New Delhi.

‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN RASHID AL MAKTOUM, VICE-PRESIDENT & PRIME MINISTER OF UAE AND RULER OF DUBAI, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD’

Download the Authentic  Open Letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, in PDF (Size: 530 kb)

From
Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],
M/S. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, 501, Metro Plaza Building,
Market Road, Near High Court, Kochi, Kerala – 682 018.

To
H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum,
Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Sub. “Damages For Non-Enforcement of Judgments of UAE Courts &
Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration”

His Highness,

This ‘Open Letter’ is a reminder of the previous letter to H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India, Dated 28th Feb, 2018. Full text.

The Petitioner is forwarding herewith a copy of his latest representation to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, dated 09th Feb-2018 for redressal of sufferings and deprivation of all his Rights and assets consequent on his fraudulent and inhuman deportation from the UAE in the year 1996 over-riding the fact that 4 successive Judgments in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts, finding the UAE officials guilty of the most heinous crimes against him.

The petitioner was closely associated with the Private Departments of (Late) H,H.Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan, from 1982 onwards, the then Emir of Abu Dhabi and also the President of United Arab Emirates, H.H. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who succeeded Sheikh Zayed as ruler and many others in the ruling family. He had registrations with all the major Oil & Gas Companies on behalf of his firms General Contracting & Trading Est., with all mandatory Governmental Licences, for bidding/tendering/projects/participations etc., and contributed much to the developments of Abu Dhabi Emirate. The petitioner was one of the first India-born real estate investors in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which is a multi-trillion US dollar industry today.

This is a case of personal and racially aggravated attack with malicious motives by ‘higher officials of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, in collaboration with Police, to stop an ‘execution of a Decree’ awarded by the Civil Court on an Apartment Tower  contract  in 1995,  which involves extortion, trespassing, inhuman torture, illegal detention,  criminal conspiracy and fraud against an Indian investor.

[The following part was a significant turning point in this case, it also exposes the deplorable state of affairs in the Administration of Abu Dhabi Police, during the period of the petitioner’s case; in the year 1995].

“In the instant case, the Abu Dhabi policemen did their atrocious acts towards the petitioner in a terrible manner and were caught red-handed by the Petitioner while committing burglary at his office. Thereby they already lost their face.

The policemen who came responding to the alert of the Petitioner, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the  law breakers and jointly attacked the petitioner so horribly, worse than death, at the instance of the local Emirati  (the friend of ‘Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan’) for getting illegal gains and to circumvent the Court’s order in force against him. The Petitioner and his younger brother were literally kidnapped from their office by the policemen and were held as a shield against their aggravated crimes.

The Criminal Court found the offenders (A group of policemen and the local Emirati) were guilty and, therefore, passed orders to investigate the crime committed by them. Then followed several other Court Judgments and orders in absolute in favour of the petitioner including the highest Court of Abu Dhabi, against the culprits”.

An excerpt from the Apex Court Judgment reads as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment, 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates).

The enforcement of a Judgment is regarded as an integral part of the fundamental Human Right to a fair trial in a reasonable time. That has been violated. Worst still, the Judgment-debtor, the UAE ruler, bypassed all the laws to commit the offense of defrauding the Judgment Creditor in the most cruel and diabolical manner, to deny him the fruits of the decrees obtained by him, forced him to leave behind his well established three business concerns, real estate properties and other investments, images and reputation in the UAE, hard earned by his blood and sweat and valuable expertise in profession.

After arriving India in 1996, the petitioner had submitted very many representations to your Excellency, as a respondent in the case, detailing his inordinate sufferings due to the patent violations of Human Rights perpetrated against him by your country. Two Judicial Orders were also passed by the High Court of Delhi to you (after approaching the Supreme Court) to settle the case.  A period of twenty two years is passed by till date, but there was no response/acknowledgement was received to any of them.

The Petitioner is yet to receive any relief from the country you are privileged to represent in India.  In recent times, the scenario  in legal area has changed entirely.  That a citizen of any country can seek relief from another country (including UAE) has been established, and also acquiesced in by UAE.

The issue of summons to the UAE Ambassador in America, in a Civil Suit instituted in 2009 in a U.S. District Court against UAE (against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family, who were accused of roles in the abduction and torture) has led to this important development.  Though the charges and jurisdiction of American Court were questioned initially by UAE, it was conceded as evidenced by settlement reached in between the U.S. citizen and UAE.  It is, therefore, open to Indian Courts or authorities to give relief to a person in India, to sue your Government as well in the light of the legal development.

In the present case, UAE Government has additionally made investments in various parts of India.  Your Government is also engaging in trading and commercial activities worth billions of US dollars.  UAE owns properties in the State of Kerala as well.

Before instituting a Suit against you and your country in the light of subsequent development, the Petitioner felt, and he was advised by the Legal Cell of the Indian Society of Authors (with a former Judge of Kerala High Court as Chairman), and members like Judges of the Mumbai and Kerala High Courts and other Government Lawyers that,  it would be desirable to appraise you about his intention to file a Suit in Kerala for securing relief overdue.

The Petitioner would certainly like to avoid a legal battle, wasteful and long drawn out. This letter is to request you humbly, to compensate him for the damages he has sustained under the various counts including violation and deprivation of the Human Rights, and torture and for the deprivation of all his businesses, assets and earnings situated in UAE at the time of his illegal deportation.  The compensation due to him, would be very substantial, aggregating to very many millions of US Dollars. The Petitioner would be only happy in the circumstances, if you could settle his claim, or agree for a settlement by known legal methods including Arbitration as regards quantum of compensation;  Arbitration by a mutually agreed authority.  He would prefer the direct settlement between the parties.

The UAE is liable to pay the petitioner for all the natural and direct consequences of its wrongful act. Apart from actual loss and exemplary or punitive damages, he is entitled to get compensatory damages for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, aggravated damages for pain and sufferings, violation of his dignity, respect and rights,  as detailed in the representation filed before the Government of India, towards the price of his business assets, real estate investments left behind in the UAE when he was illegally deported; and the business profits and gains and its market value he would have earned, as well as other expenses for all these years that followed.

There was not merely criminal failure on the part of the authorities in the implementation of a set of Judgements of the Court of Law (in the case relating to aggravated assault, burglary etc.) The authorities are also liable to compensate the petitioner for his intangible injuries as damages suffered from physical and psychological pain as result of the unjust and illegal actions of the authorities, continued up to the deportation and resultant deprivation when he landed in his home land, bereft of any assets whatever.

The (irremediable) damages inflicted on Petitioner by UAE authorities and its far-reaching repercussions:-

Mental distress (by aggravated assault, abduction, detention, extortion, and inhuman torture);

Anguish (resulting from the impact of torture, and deprivation of businesses, investments, company staffs and employees and mental peace of the members of his family and relatives);

Grief (about the state of affairs of himself and the members of his family);

Anxiety (about his own health, ailments, and worries about his staffs, employees and his family) He had to suffer pancreas disorders, heart ailments, compelling him to be an inpatient in hospitals, and continuing to suffer such ailments requiring constant and massive medication;

Vexation (including that caused by the feelings of agony to himself and the members of his family);

Indignation (against the inhumanities of the administration);

Outrage (about the total lack of Rule of Law, and the feeling that even the judiciary is treated with contempt);

Wounded Pride (in the background of the loss of high esteem and dignity he enjoyed in UAE and his homeland India);

Loss of Faith (regarding the petitioner in friends and colleagues and the like. Such persons included businessmen attached to very prestigious investing establishments).

The petitioner  is entitled to compensation for this unique case of  repeated defrauding of the ‘Judgement Creditor’, torturing him to near death, and violating ‘Four Judgements of the UAE Courts’ in his favour and the like. Having regard to the serious nature of the loss and injuries suffered and continuing to be suffered, he is also entitled to an interim relief, on urgent basis, fixed at 120 million US Dollars [INR.782 crore].

The Petitioner seeks an expeditious remedy, in view of the sufferings undergone by him for a long duration of nearly twenty-two years.  As a founder member of ‘INSA’, (Indian Society of Authors, Kerala Chapter), the Petitioner have already requested ‘INSA’ to offer him assistance through their Legal Cell, and he expect that, the organization and its Legal Cell (with very many former Judges of the High Courts and Subordinate Courts and Senior Lawyers) to help him in the just and equitable cause.

The Petitioner expects a  response and reply before 14th May, 2018.  If there is no response, he will be constrained to resort to legal proceedings, holding you and your country responsible for all the costs and consequences thereof.

Yours faithfully,

Panikkaveettil K. Jabir, [Petitioner],

Encl:
Ref. Letter to Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Hon’ble Minister for External Affairs, dated 09-02-2018.

Open Letter [Main] to:
H.E Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, the UAE Ambassador to India, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud by the UAE Administration’

Open Letter [Copies] to:
1) H.H Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, The President of UAE & Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
2) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai.
3) H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces.
4) H.H Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of UAE and International Cooperation.
5) H.H Lt. General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister of UAE and Minister of the Interior.
6) H.E Jamal Hussain Al Zaabi, The Consular General of the UAE, UAE Consulate, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Last Update: 20th April, 2018, New Delhi.

Return to the Legal Cell’s Founder CEO

Visit Case Exhibits: UAE.JABIR.NET

MISSION STATEMENT

Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

CASE LAW   |   RESOURCES   |  SOCIAL MEDIA   |   PUBLICATIONS   |   NEWS ROOM

]]> https://www.reparationlaw.com/news/open-letter-to-sheikh-mohammed-bin-rashid-prime-minister-of-uae-and-ruler-of-dubai-to-claim-damages-for-non-enforcement-of-a-set-of-judgments-of-uae-courts-outright-fraud/feed/ 0 no20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN RASHID AL MAKTOUM, VICE-PRESIDENT & PRIME MINISTER OF UAE AND RULER OF DUBAI, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT... Read more »20th April, 2018 New Delhi. ‘OPEN LETTER TO H.H SHEIKH MOHAMMED BIN RASHID AL MAKTOUM, VICE-PRESIDENT & PRIME MINISTER OF UAE AND RULER OF DUBAI, TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT... Read more »Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Executive Branch, Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, Arbitrary Detention in UAE, Delhi High Court, Deprivation of Liberty in UAE, Dubai, Extortion Abu Dhabi, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Regime, Fugitive Debtor UAE, Government of India, Human Rights, Human Rights Council, India's National Shame, India-UAE Extradition Treaty, India’s Diplomacy, India’s rotten diplomacy, International Criminal Court, Jabir v. Mohammed Bin Zayed, Judgment Creditor’s Booklet, Judgment Debtor, Judgment For Sale, Malicious Prosecution IN UAE, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Multi-billion Dollars Case, P.K.Jabir, Republic Day 2017, Republic Day Black Day, Saudi Arabia, Shaikh Saif Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, UAE Debt Referral Program, UAE Fraud, UAE Interior Minister, UAE Judgment Equities, United Arab Emirates, Willful Defaulters UAE, Year of Zayed, Years of Hope, Open Letter to H.H Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, to Claim Damages For Non-Enforcement of a Set of Judgments of UAE Courts & Outright Fraud, UAE Judgments For Sale!, UAE Police-Looting, Vice-President & Prime Minister of UAE and Ruler of Dubai