RIGHT SPEAK

ICYMI: Senators Explore Avenues To Denaturalize And Deport More Fraudsters And America-Haters: ‘The American people are tired of a government that treats their citizenship as cheap, their laws as optional and their generosity as an invitation to be exploited.’; DOJ Moves To Denaturalize Alleged Terrorists And War Criminals

2026-06-21T00:09:00.000-04:00

Senators Explore Avenues To Denaturalize And Deport More Fraudsters And America-Haters:

‘The American people are tired of a government that treats their citizenship as cheap, their laws as optional and their generosity as an invitation to be exploited.’

American citizenship for naturalized immigrants is a privilege that should be revoked if someone betrays their oath of allegiance to the United States, according to an argument from Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., when discussing his SCAM Act before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution on Wednesday.

Schmitt, who chaired the subcommittee, used the hearing to promote his Stop Citizenship Abuse and Misrepresentation (SCAM) Act, which would do two major things: it would expand from five to 10 years the window of time after naturalization in which individuals who commit crimes that violate their oath of allegiance to the United States or who lied to get their citizenship can be denaturalized and deported, and it expands the scope of crimes that meet that standard.

“Across the country, we’re seeing the consequences of a broken naturalization system that loosely granted citizenship, and then refused to revoke it from those who stole it,” Schmitt said. “The American people are tired of a government that treats their citizenship as cheap, their laws as optional, and their generosity as an invitation to be exploited. If the government never revoked citizenship obtained by fraud, the oath becomes theater, the application becomes a game, the American citizen becomes a sucker in his own country.”

Schmitt called upon a Department of Justice review which found that naturalized citizens made up over 25% of international terrorism convictions from 9/11 through 2016, and witnesses cited recent examples of naturalized citizens committing acts of terror, espionage, and fraud.

One such example was the “Old Dominion Shooter” who shot and killed Lt. Col. Brandon Shah and injured two others in March. The gunman was a naturalized citizen named Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, who had been previously convicted for trying to aid ISIS.

Majority witness Ken Cuccinelli, a former director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), pointed out that despite his terrorism conviction, Jalloh was never denaturalized and deported. If the law had been followed more strictly, he never would have been in the United States to commit that murder.

USCIS’ Operation Janus also uncovered 315,000 cases of missing fingerprint data for naturalized citizens, and at least 858 people who had deportation orders that all obtained citizenship anyway with false identities.

Schmitt used examples like these to promote the SCAM Act as a remedy for these situations, which he feels are an indication that the naturalization process makes it far too easy for people who should not be in the United States to obtain citizenship.

“The SCAM Act gives the government stronger tools when serious conduct shortly after naturalization reveals the truth that was hiding during the process,” Schmitt said. “We need a serious, nationwide denaturalization effort against fraudsters, felons, terrorists, spies, and anyone who obtained American citizenship by deceit.”

As Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, pointed out, there are specific requirements to be naturalized as a citizen. One must swear the oath of allegiance, pass a civics test, and prove “good moral character,” that they are “attached to the principles of the Constitution,” and that they are “well-disposed to the good order and happiness of the United States.” --->READ MORE HERE

Gage Skidmore/Getty Images

DOJ Moves To Denaturalize Alleged Terrorists And War Criminals:

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is moving to denaturalize 12 individuals for offenses and allegations including providing material support to terrorism, war crimes and sexual abuse of a minor, the Daily Caller has learned.

The DOJ is expected to announce on Friday that it is filing denaturalizing actions against 12 individuals, originally from Iraq, Colombia, Morocco, Somalia, Gambia, Bolivia, Uzbekistan, Kenya, India, China and Nigeria.

Ali Yousif Ahmed, a native of Iraq, is one of the individuals the DOJ says they are taking action against. Ahmed came to the U.S. in 2009, claiming his family was attacked by Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq. Ten years later, Iraq asked the U.S. to extradite Ahmed to Iraq, claiming he was facing criminal charges for the premeditated murder of two Iraqi police officers in 2006.

“Upon further investigation, United States learned that, in 2015, Ahmed illegally procured his naturalization, which warrants his denaturalization, because he lied under oath about his criminal and family history when he sought admission to the United States and naturalized as a U.S. citizen,” a document on the denaturalization process and shared with the Caller read.

Khalid Ouazzani, a native of Morocco, applied for U.S. citizenship in 2005 and then again a year later, according to the DOJ. Ouazzani was allegedly “planning—with two men later convicted of trying to bomb the New York Stock exchange—ways to support AlQaida” in 2003. Then after being naturalized, Ouazzani pleaded guilty to sending al-Qaida tens of thousands of dollars with money he had fraudulently obtained Ouazzani also took a pledge of pledge of allegiance in 2008 to al-Qaida.

The DOJ is also looking to strip Baboucarr Mboob, a native of Gambia, of his naturalization, claiming he was involved in war crimes, the Caller learned. Mboob was a military police officer in the Gambian army and participated in the execution of six officers following the orders from his commanding officer who believed were victims in plotting a counter-coup against then President Yahya Jammeh, according to the DOJ. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

157 C-Clashes in F-Line: 23 in Pokrovsk Dir, 16 in Huliaipole Dir, 13 in Sloviansk Dir; UKR Hits RU Oil, Gas Sites in Crimea and Siberia; UKR Blasts One of Siberia’s Largest Oil Refs in What May be UKR's Deepest Strike into RU; UKR Intensifies Strikes On Crimea Supply Routes, Renewed Hit On Henichesk Strait Bridge, Rear Logistics Network; Hits on Pantsir System, Drone Cmd-Posts; Explosions in Kerch and Yevpatoria, LIVE UPDATES, DETAILS, and LOTS MORE

2026-06-21T00:07:00.000-04:00

The Darknode Battalion of the 412th Nemesis Brigade of the Unmanned Systems Forces has already destroyed three thousand enemy strike UAVs. And since the beginning of the day on June 20, 157 clashes have occurred on the battlefield:

The Unmanned Systems Forces shared their achievement on the Telegram channel.

"This result is the result of thousands of stopped threats, saved lives, and the daily work of the crews who cover the Ukrainian sky," the message states.

To show the scale of the work done, SBS has put together an infographic on what 3,000 downed "Shaheeds" mean in practice. It, in particular, noted that the strike force of such a number of "Shaheeds" is equal to the power of 330 Kh-101 cruise missiles, they are capable of destroying 4,000 apartments or destroying the energy system of a European country.

Since the beginning of the day, the Russians have attacked the positions of the Defense Forces 157 times: the situation in the main areas

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has released operational information regarding the Russian invasion as of 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, June 20.

The enemy carried out 56 air strikes, dropped 163 guided bombs. In addition, it engaged 6,373 kamikaze drones for destruction and carried out 1,843 attacks on settlements and positions of our troops.

No combat clashes were recorded in the North Slobozhansk and Kursk directions . The enemy carried out 60 attacks on settlements and positions of our troops, two of which were using multiple launch rocket systems.

In the South Slobozhansky direction, the enemy stormed the positions of our units near Izbitsky and Zybyny six times. Three clashes lasted.

In the Kupyansk direction, the enemy attacked the positions of the Defense Forces three times today in the Novoplatonivka area and towards Kivsharivka, Kupyansk–Vuzlovye. One clash lasted.

To advance in the Lyman direction, the invaders made eleven attempts, which Ukrainian soldiers successfully repelled in the areas of Shyykivka, Olhivka, Novoselivka, Drobysheve, Derylovy, and Lyman.

In the Slavyansk direction, the Defense Forces successfully stopped thirteen attempts by the invaders to advance near Kryvaya Luka, Kalenkypyk, Zakytne, and towards Rai-Oleksandrivka.

One enemy assault was recorded in the Kramatorsk direction , where the enemy tried to displace our defenders from the occupied positions in the area of the settlement of Tikhonivka.

In the Kostyantynivka direction, the Defense Forces repelled eleven enemy assaults near the settlements of Pleshchiivka, Ivanopillya, Illinivka, Rusyn Yar and towards Kostyantynivka.

A total of 23 attacks were carried out by the enemy in the Pokrovsky direction . The occupiers tried to advance in the areas of the settlements of Vilne, Novooleksandrivka, Shevchenko, Kotlyne, Udachne, Dorozhne and towards Bilytsky, Kucherovy Yar, Shakhove, Novopavlivka, Filia, Toretsky, Rodynsky, Novogrishino, Gulivoye, Mirny, Sergiyevka. Three clashes are still ongoing. According to preliminary estimates, today 27 occupiers were eliminated here and 21 were wounded; one tank, one self-propelled artillery mount, six units of automobile and five units of special enemy equipment were destroyed. Six artillery systems, three units of automobile equipment and two enemy UAV control points were damaged. 231 unmanned aerial vehicles of various types were destroyed or suppressed. --->READ MORE HERE

At the front - 157 clashes, the Armed Forces of Ukraine neutralized almost fifty occupiers in the Pokrov direction:

During June 20, there were 157 combat clashes between the Ukrainian Defense Forces and the Russian invaders at the front, in particular, in the Pokrovsky direction the enemy tried to attack 23 times.

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reported this on Facebook , publishing operational information as of 10:00 p.m., Ukrinform reports.

"In total, 157 combat clashes have taken place since the beginning of this day. The enemy carried out 56 air strikes, dropped 163 guided bombs. In addition, it involved 6,373 kamikaze drones for destruction and carried out 1,843 shelling of settlements and positions of our troops," the report says.

No combat clashes were recorded in the North-Slobozhansk and Kursk directions . The enemy carried out 60 attacks on settlements and positions of our troops, two of which were using multiple launch rocket systems.

During the day, in the South-Slobozhansk direction, the enemy stormed the positions of our units near Izbitsky and Zybyny six times. Three clashes are ongoing.

In the Kupyansk direction, the enemy attacked the Defense Forces positions three times today in the Novoplatonivka area and towards Kivsharivka, Kupyansk–Vuzlovye. One clash is ongoing.

To advance in the Lyman direction, the invaders made 11 attempts, which Ukrainian soldiers successfully repelled in the areas of Shyykivka, Olhivka, Novoselivka, Drobysheve, Derylovy, and Lyman.

In the Slavyansk direction, the Defense Forces successfully stopped 13 attempts by the invaders to advance near Kryvaya Luka, Kalenkypyk, Zakytne, and towards Rai-Oleksandrivka.

One enemy assault was recorded in the Kramatorsk direction , where the enemy tried to dislodge our defenders from the occupied positions in the area of the settlement of Tikhonivka.

In the Kostyantynivka direction, the Defense Forces repelled 11 enemy assaults near the settlements of Pleshchiivka, Ivanopillya, Illinivka, Rusyn Yar and towards Kostyantynivka.

In total, the enemy carried out 23 attacks in the Pokrovsk direction . The occupiers tried to advance in the areas of the settlements of Vilne, Novooleksandrivka, Shevchenko, Kotlyne, Udachne, Dorozhne and towards Bilytsky, Kucherovy Yar, Shakhovye, Novopavlivka, Filia, Toretsky, Rodynsky, Novogrishynye, Gulivye, Myrny, Sergiyevka. Three clashes are still ongoing. --->READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to +++++relevant+++++ and related stories:

+++++Russia-Ukraine News LATEST UPDATES: (REUTERS) (AP) (NY POST) and (WSJ)+++++

+++++Russian oil, gas sites in Crimea and Siberia hit by Ukrainian drones+++++

+++++Ukraine blasts one of Siberia’s largest oil refineries in what may be war’s deepest strike into Russia+++++

+++++Ukraine intensifies strikes on Crimea supply routes with renewed hit on Henichesk Strait bridge and rear logistics network+++++

+++++Ukrainian Forces Struck Henichesk Bridge, Pantsir System, and Drone Command Posts +++++

+++++Crimea was attacked by drones - explosions in Kerch and Yevpatoria+++++

Lukashenko and Putin must determine what is more important to them - radars or oil refining: Portnikov on Zelensky's ultimatum

Russia faces spreading fuel shortages after Ukrainian drones pummel refineries

Russia sent quad bikes to clear a minefield. Ukraine’s drones did the rest.

Pro-Ukrainian partisans sabotage electric substation powering military plant in southern Russia, Atesh group claims

Partisan sabotage forced an emergency shutdown of drone production at Russian defense plant, ATESH claims

Raid Regiment Strikes the Only Gas Storage Facility in Crimea

Russia reduced the use of BM-35 strike drones after Starlink shutdown

Due to losses from interceptors, the Russians are switching to cheaper reconnaissance drones and escorting strike UAVs

Russia loses 1,240 soldiers and 88 artillery systems over past day

"Ukraine is grateful to the Polish people": Zelensky announced that he sent the Order of the White Eagle to the President of Poland

Poland took the Order of the White Eagle from Zelenskyy, while Mussolini and Catherine II remain its knights: who else has the award

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

President Trump’s Crackdown On H1B Visa Abuse Sends Dallas Home Prices Way Down

2026-06-21T00:05:00.000-04:00

President Trump’s crackdown on H1B visa abuse sends Dallas home prices way down:

President Trump’s H-1B clampdown mixed with mass tech layoffs is cooling the Texas suburbs, and other parts of the country — and that may be the point.
Indian tech workers once turbocharged home prices north of Dallas. Now they’re gone — and a housing correction is already underway.

For years, the suburbs north of Dallas were ground zero for one of the most extraordinary housing booms in America. Subdivisions multiplied. Prices soared. Builders couldn’t put up homes fast enough.

The engine behind it all was a wave of Indian-born H-1B visa workers flooding into high-tech jobs along a corporate corridor that attracted more company headquarters relocations than anywhere else in the country between 2018 and today, according to real estate firm CBRE Group.
Now that engine is sputtering — and the White House may be fine with that.
Trump’s escalating crackdown on the H-1B program, which grants temporary visas to high-skilled foreign workers, has helped trigger a price correction in one of the nation’s most overheated regional housing markets.

Meanwhile, over 52,000 tech sector jobs were cut during the first three months of the year. By early summer 2026, tech industry job losses had surpassed 123,000, with AI consistently cited as the primary reason for these workforce reductions.

In Collin County — the suburban epicenter of the boom — home prices fell nearly 9% year-over-year as of February, more than double the 4% drop recorded across the broader Dallas-Fort Worth metro, according to Redfin data.

The retreat of Indian buyers from the market, once the dominant force behind new home sales in the area, is beginning to function like a release valve.
The scale of what happened north of Dallas is hard to overstate.

The federal government granted nearly 32,000 new H-1B approvals in the Dallas area alone during the Biden administration — topping Silicon Valley, Seattle, San Francisco and Washington, DC, according to a Bloomberg investigation published this week, which cited US Citizenship and Immigration Services data. Only the New York City metro area ranked higher.

The workers who arrived on those visas poured into new subdivisions in Prosper, Frisco and Celina, where the population more than tripled in just five years.

Collin and Denton counties became the fastest-growing in the nation among those with a population of at least 1 million, census data shows.

Collin County’s Indian-born population averaged more than 116,000 residents annually in the five years through 2024, up sharply from 70,000 in the preceding five-year period.

In Frisco alone — a city of 235,000 residents roughly 30 miles north of downtown Dallas — the share of Indian residents ballooned from about 6% in the early 2010s to nearly 20% by the mid-2020s, census figures show.
Builders tailored homes to this clientele. One North Texas builder, Zach Schneider of Tradition Homes, designed model homes with north-facing “puja” rooms for Hindu prayer and optional “spice kitchens” for buyers from India.

At peak demand, South Asians represented 70% of his company’s sales. By early this year, that figure had fallen below 30%, even as he sat on a backlog of 125 luxury homes under construction.

The policy response from Washington has been sweeping. Trump has raised minimum salary thresholds for H-1B workers, imposed new fees and directed the program to prioritize the highest-paid applicants. The Labor Department launched “Project Firewall,” an enforcement initiative targeting alleged employer abuse of the visa system.

Then, in September 2025, Trump signed a proclamation imposing a $100,000 fee on new H-1B petitions — a measure that effectively priced out the staffing firms and mid-tier tech contractors that had been the biggest sponsors of Indian workers in markets like Dallas.
The Trump administration also directed the Department of Housing and Urban Development to bar non-permanent residents, including H-1B visa holders, from accessing FHA-insured mortgages starting May 25, 2025. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Pope Leo Says Migrants Should Integrate And Obey The Law: Letting Everyone Into Your Country, Regardless of Their Culture or Willingness to Assimilate, is Not Christian Charity. It’s Chaos and Civilizational Collapse

2026-06-21T00:03:00.000-04:00

Ricardo Stuckert/PR/Lula Oficial/Flickr/Cropped/CC By-SA 4.0

Pope Leo Says Migrants Should Integrate And Obey The Law:

Letting everyone into your country, regardless of their culture or willingness to assimilate, is not Christian charity. It’s chaos and civilizational collapse.

When Pope Leo XIV last week completed his seven-day trip to Spain by visiting the Canary Islands, where thousands of migrants have died attempting to reach Europe, one would expect the usual boilerplate language typical of the Catholic hierarchy of late. This would include that Western nations need to treat immigrants with respect and dignity (hint: unreservedly welcoming them in and putting them on the fast track to citizenship) and that immigrants have the right to leave their nations of origin. There was certainly some of that, similar to his predecessor, Francis.
But what was surprisingly welcome was that the pope tempered that language with exhortations and warnings to those same migrants, a message that has been often frustratingly absent from the Catholic Church’s public commentary regarding one of the greatest crises facing the West. It’s language that many of the Catholic faithful — and the broader world that, to various degrees, still looks to the papacy as a moral compass — desperately yearned to hear, especially given that Catholic teaching is actually quite nuanced and moderate on the topic of immigration and borders. One hopes the rest of the Catholic hierarchy were paying attention.

What Pope Leo Said About Immigration

Some of what Pope Leo said was relatively unsurprising. He warned European nations that they “cannot claim to uphold human dignity while growing accustomed to the Mediterranean and the Atlantic becoming unmarked graves.” He declared: “Human dignity has no passport and does not lose its value when crossing a border.” He threw a bouquet of flowers into the ocean to honor those migrants who had died trying to reach the Canary Islands in search of a better life. In many respects, this mimics language Leo has offered since he assumed the papacy last year, including his direct criticism of U.S. enforcement of our nation’s immigration laws.

But that’s not all Pope Leo said during his Spanish trip. He reprimanded human traffickers, calling on them to repent for tricking families, threatening women, and abusing workers. He directed some of his rhetorical energy at the countries from which immigrants originate, exhorting them to preserve justice and offer economic opportunities that would curb the desire of their citizens to leave for distant shores. “While there is a right to seek refuge when life is threatened, there is also the right not to have to migrate,” he said. The pope even asserted that all countries have a “right” to define and defend their national borders.

Pope Leo even offered cautions to would-be immigrants. He warned them to reconsider the “siren songs” of traffickers who promise “easy paradises” in Europe and North America. He argued that those intending to immigrate must pursue “legal” mechanisms to move from one country to another, an implicit rebuke of the millions who have violated other nations’ laws by crossing their borders. Moreover, once those migrants arrive, Pope Leo acknowledged that as much as they have a right to preserve their own culture, they must not “creat[e] parallel worlds, closed off from one another, where people live side by side without truly encountering one another.”

Why This Is a Welcome Shift

For a long time, Catholics have become inured to the hierarchy’s tendency to emphasize the protection and celebration of immigrants over native citizens. Regardless of how many migrants illegally crossed the borders of Western nations, the faithful were told by many of their bishops, and even the previous pope, that to be anything less than welcoming was un-Christian. The West must, in Pope Francis’ words, “welcome … protect … promote … integrate.”

This was the message, even as millions of illegal migrants competed with working-class citizens for jobs. It was the message as large numbers of Muslim migrants created extensive networks that groomed and exploited thousands of native underage girls. It was the message after more than a thousand women were sexually assaulted, apparently mostly by immigrants, in a single night. It was the message after immigrants exploited federal funding programs to steal hundreds of millions of federal dollars, some of which may have funded foreign terrorist groups. And it has been the message while immigrants continue to commit acts of violence against native residents. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

New Initiative Takes ‘Maximum Warfare’ To Dems’ Racist Congressional Districts: ‘This is not the time for half measures,’ said Marshall Yates, Director of the REPAIR Initiative Gearing Up to Challenge Race-Based Districts

2026-06-21T00:01:00.000-04:00

FOX54 NEWS HUNTSVILLE/YOUTUBE
New Initiative Takes ‘Maximum Warfare’ To Dems’ Racist Congressional Districts

‘This is not the time for half measures,’ said Marshall Yates, director of the REPAIR Initiative gearing up to challenge race-based districts.

On the morning after Virginia Democrats won a short-lived gerrymandering victory at the polls, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries was feeling fat and happy. And feisty.
The New York Democrat was full of fight, or at least that’s the image the performative politician was attempting to affect to reporters at a press conference. He called Virginia voters’ approval of a rigged referendum allowing the state legislature to adopt a politically twisted congressional redistricting proposal a big victory for “democracy.”

That “victory” would quickly collapse, with the Virginia State Supreme Court declaring the election unconstitutional. But Jeffries wasn’t worried about that eventuality then. He was a warrior, audaciously declaring to the American people that Democrats would “not let Donald Trump rig the midterm elections by gerrymandering maps … without a forceful Democratic Response.” They’d do the rigging themselves, thank you very much.

“We are in an era of maximum warfare, everywhere, all the time. And we are going to keep the pressure on Republicans at every single state in the union to ensure, at the end of the day, that there is a fair, national map,” the minority leader crowed in a response to a reporter’s question. Jeffries was asked what he would do should red state Republicans respond in kind, escalating the redistricting war.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Wednesday took a victory lap on Democrats’ success in Virginia:

“We are in an era of maximum warfare, everywhere, all the time, and we're going to keep the pressure on Republicans in every single state in the union to ensure, at the end… https://t.co/vJpsfKzod3 pic.twitter.com/z6JSS5ZdcI
— Oren Oppenheim (@OrenOppenheim) April 22, 2026

Things haven’t gone well for Democrats on the redistricting front since. In fact, tough-talking Jeffries and his party got their maps handed to them.

The Grand Old Party is positioned to pick up 10 or so net House seats in the midterms after waking up to the Democrats’ “maximum warfare” campaign and turning up the heat.

Hilariously, Democrats could well lose one of their redrawn congressional districts, with an independent and a Republican grabbing the most votes thus far in this week’s California primary. Democrats, led by Gov. Gavin Newsom, drove an effort to change the Golden State’s constitution to allow the legislature to gerrymander maps that are supposed to deliver liberals an additional five congressional seats.

‘Race-Based Discrimination’

The U.S. Supreme Court, too has delivered key victories for Republicans and the republic, particularly in an April ruling that declared unconstitutional a section of the Voting Rights Act and put an end to racially-gerrymandered districts.

But the war is not over. It’s just entering a new phase.

“Minority Leader Jeffries said this is a time of ‘maximum warfare, everywhere, all the time,’ and that they were going to ‘keep maximum pressure’ on Republicans. We want to be the counterbalance to that,” Marshall Yates, who heads up the Oversight Project’s new Redistricting and Election Protection for American Integrity and Representation (REPAIR) Initiative.

It’s a long name for a powerful mission. In an interview this week with The Federalist, Yates said the initiative will be an “all-of-the-above approach” to fighting to ensure states — blue and red — are no longer drawing affirmative action maps tainted with the VRA’s stain of discrimination.

That is exactly what the U.S. Supreme Court ordered in Louisiana v. Callais. The decision specifically dealt with Louisiana’s court-ordered creation of a second majority-black congressional district. That lower court found that Louisiana’s sole race-based district more than likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

“Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 … was designed to enforce the Constitution — not collide with it,” Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the 6-3 ruling. “Unfortunately, lower courts have sometimes applied this Court’s §2 precedents in a way that forces States to engage in the very race-based discrimination that the Constitution forbids,”

The folks over at the left-leaning Brennan Center have joined a chorus of race-based preference leftists in screaming that Callais will roll back “half a century of steady progress toward racial equality in voting practices.” In fact, the ruling rolls back a 60-year affront to equality that the Constitution has never countenanced.

‘Not the Time for Half Measures’ --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

State Department Ends Scams That Sent Hundreds Of Pregnant Women To US To Exploit Birthplace Citizenship: ‘Consular officers — working with law enforcement and using data analytics — identified several networks abusing the system and put a stop to it.’; US Visa Update: Trump Admin Outlines Crackdown on Birth Tourism

2026-06-20T00:09:00.000-04:00

AP/YOUTUBE

State Department Ends Scams That Sent Hundreds Of Pregnant Women To US To Exploit Birthplace Citizenship:

‘Consular officers — working with law enforcement and using data analytics — identified several networks abusing the system and put a stop to it.’

The United States has shut down multiple birth tourism networks across Europe and Africa, the State Department announced Wednesday, stating, “No foreigner is permitted to obtain a visitor visa for the primary purpose of acquiring U.S. citizenship for a child by giving birth in the U.S.”
According to the State Department, the networks have been trying to ship hundreds of pregnant foreign nationals into the United States homeland so they can give birth there and gain citizenship for the child. Foreigners who do so can then use the child’s citizenship as an anchor to stay in the country.

“A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right. The State Department is taking action around the world to stop this abuse, dismantle birth tourism networks, and hold accountable those who try to scam our system,” the State Department said on social media.

A U.S. embassy in West Africa found what the State Department called a “sophisticated birth tourism network” where more than 100 foreigners were “using fraudulent documents and visa ‘fixers'” to obtain access to the United States. The department said they “shut it down,” revoked the visas, and are working with local governments to identify and stop any other operations.

In a similar fashion a U.S. embassy in North Africa revoked more than 100 visas for parents who came to the U.S. for the purposes of giving birth and accessing U.S. citizenship. “Consular officers — working with law enforcement and using data analytics — identified several networks abusing the system and put a stop to it,” the department stated.

Embassy officials in Europe discovered more than 400 cases of suspected birth tourism dating back to 2024 and traced them to “at least six companies that coached applicants on what to say in their visa interview, arranged U.S. housing, and set up delivery plans,” the State Department said, adding that they shut those operations down as well and “permanently banned several fraudsters from ever traveling to the United States again.”

Birth tourism is yet another fraud scheme perpetrated by Third-Worlders who see the United States as a suicidally empathetic ATM, ripe for cultural invasion. More than half of all immigrants, and an even larger percentage of illegal immigrants, sap U.S. public welfare systems of billions of dollars, forcing Americans to be bled dry paying for their own replacement.
Birth tourism only works because of a nonsense interpretation of the 14th Amendment that allows so-called “birthright citizenship” (a.k.a birthplace citizenship), skewing the amendment to mean that anyone from anywhere who happens to be born on American soil is automatically a U.S. citizen. --->READ MORE HERE

Ian Waldie/Getty Images

US Visa Update: Trump Admin Outlines Crackdown on Birth Tourism:

The Trump administration on Wednesday escalated its global crackdown on “birth tourism,” with the State Department detailing a series of enforcement actions targeting foreign nationals accused of using U.S. visitor visas to secure citizenship for their children.

In a series of posts on X, the State Department said it is “defending the integrity of U.S. citizenship” by shutting down networks that help pregnant travelers enter the United States under false pretenses, warning that visas will be denied or revoked if childbirth is the primary purpose of travel.

The posts outlining more than 600 cases underscore a broader immigration push that has intensified scrutiny of visa applicants worldwide, particularly those suspected of misrepresenting their intent during consular interviews.

The announcement comes as the Trump administration has also tightened scrutiny across other visa programs, including H‑1B visas, as part of a broader effort to curb what officials describe as fraud and misuse in the immigration system.

Dr. John C. Eastman of The Claremont Institute, who has advocated for changes to birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court, told Newsweek that the cases outlined make an argument for the changes made by the administration.

"The State Department’s recent exposé and revocation of fraudulent visas is further evidence of the need for President Trump’s Executive Order, correcting the misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause, which was never intended to apply to temporary or illegal visitors to this Country," Eastman said.

"The birth tourism scam may be the most high-profile abuse, but the problem is much larger, and unless fixed, our very sovereignty and 'consent of the governed' cornerstone principle will be at risk."

David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, told Newsweek on Wednesday: "This is nothing new, and it should have no effect on the birthright citizenship debate."

"A small number of people come to the United States to give birth, including for legitimate medical reasons, and there is no reason to take away Americans' only foolproof defense against an ICE arrest based on this small issue," Bier said. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

131 C-Clashes in F-Line: 23 in Pokrovsk Dir, 25 in Huliaipole Dir, 15 in Kostiantynivka Dir; UKR Targets (Mos)cow for 2nd Day in Row; Mos Attacked by Sichen and FP-1 Drones; Mos Oil Ref Halts Operations; RU Forces Depend on Crimea. UKR Turning It Into an Island; UKR’s SF Disabled Rail Bridge Feeding RU-Occ Crimea; Zelensky: Belarus Must Remove Repeaters for RU Drones, or UKR Will Do It, LIVE UPDATES, DETAILS, and LOTS MORE

2026-06-20T00:07:00.000-04:00

There are 131 clashes on the front, the Pokovsky and Hulyaypil are the destinations the hottest:

The There are 131 combat clashes on the front, and in the Pokrovovsky and Hulyayep directions, the French out the few 50 attacks on the positions of the Defense Forces.

This is the data by Ukrinform with the newsletter to the active information from the General Staff of the Mass Forces of Ukraine as 22:00 on June 19, 2026 on Facebook .

"In total, 131 com clashes have pool place since the beginning of this day. The enemy out of the 45 air strikes - 132 guided bombs. In addition, it half 2,087 kamikaze drones to destroye wool and out 1,341 shelling of the settlements and positions of our troops," the publication of the notes.

As to the General Staff, in the North Slobozhansk and Kursk directions, the prop go out two airstrikes using the five anti-aircraft w rock, and out 54 on attacks on the settlements and positions of our troops, one of the MLRS.

In the South Slobozhansk direction, the enemy the attacked positions of our seven steps times in the direction of the settlements of Prylipka, Izbitske, Vovchansk, Okhrimivka, and Dvorichanske. One of the these attacks is ongoing still.

No an anti-scam of actions in the article in the Kupyansk direction .

In the Lyman direction, Ukrainian soldiers retelled 10 assault by the invaders, in the areas of the settlements of Borova, Drobysheve, Novoselivka, Stavky, and Lyman. Two of these attacks are ongoing still.

In the Slavyansk direction, the stormed nineed menteen towards Rai-Oleksandrivka and in the area of Riznykivka, Kryva Luka, Zakytne and Kalenkyvyk. Three of theses are in half-trance.

In the Kramatorsk direction, the soots once anti-at scale in the area of Chasovy Yar.

In the Kostyanyntynivka direction, the invaders stormsed positions of our demo defendations 15 times in the areas of the settlements of Kostyantivka, Pleshiivka, Illinivka, Rusynivka, Yaryn, Vilne, and Kucheriv Yar. One of them is ongoing still.

In the Pokrovsky direction, the enemy out of the 23 attacks. The occupiers in the advance to the areas of the settlements of Ivanivka, Novyi Donbas, Rodinske, Novooleksandrivka, Bilytske, Novogrishyne, Serhiyvka, Kotlyne, Udachne, Filiya and Novopavivka. Two of these attacks are ongoing still. --->READ MORE HERE

Since the beginning of the day, over 130 battles have taken place at the front, the enemy launched 2,000 drones - General Staff:

The enemy carried out 45 airstrikes, dropping 132 guided bombs, and used 2,087 kamikaze drones. The most attacks were recorded on the Pokrovsk and Huliaipole directions.

In total, since the beginning of this day, 131 combat engagements have occurred on the front. The enemy launched over 2,000 drones and dropped 132 guided aerial bombs, reports UNN citing the General Staff's summary.

The enemy carried out 45 airstrikes – dropping 132 guided aerial bombs. In addition, they used 2,087 kamikaze drones for strikes and conducted 1,341 shellings of populated areas and positions of our troops
- the statement reads.

On the North-Slobozhanskyi and Kursk directions , the enemy carried out two airstrikes using five KABs, conducted 54 shellings of populated areas and positions of our troops, one of which used MLRS.

On the South-Slobozhanskyi direction , the enemy attacked the positions of our units seven times towards the settlements of Prylipka, Izbystske, Vovchansk, Okhrimivka, and Dvorichanske. One of these attacks is still ongoing.

On the Kupiansk direction , no enemy assault actions were recorded.

On the Lyman direction , Ukrainian soldiers repelled 10 assaults by the occupiers in the areas of the settlements Borova, Drobysheve, Novoselivka, Stavky, and Lyman. Two of these attacks are still ongoing.

On the Sloviansk direction , the enemy stormed nine times towards Rai-Oleksandrivka and in the area of Riznykivka, Kryva Luka, Zakitne, and Kalenyky. Three of these assaults are still ongoing.

On the Kramatorsk direction , the enemy attacked once in the area of Chasiv Yar.

On the Kostiantynivka direction , the occupiers stormed the positions of our defenders 15 times today in the areas of the settlements Kostiantynivka, Ploshchivka, Illinivka, Rusyn Yar, Vilne, and Kucheriv Yar. One of them is still ongoing.

On the Pokrovsk direction , the enemy carried out 23 attacks. The occupiers attempted to advance in the areas of the settlements Ivanivka, Novyi Donbas, Rodynske, Novooleksandrivka, Bilytske, Novohryshyne, Serhiivka, Kotlyne, Udachne, Filia, and Novopavlivka. Two of these attacks are still ongoing. --->READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to +++++relevant+++++ and related stories:

+++++Russia-Ukraine News LATEST UPDATES: (REUTERS) (AP) (NY POST) and (WSJ)+++++

+++++Ukraine war latest: Kyiv targets Moscow for second day in a row following record drone assault+++++

+++++Moscow Attacked by Sichen and FP-1 Drones+++++

+++++Moscow Oil Refinery halts operations after largest-ever drone attack on Russian capital, General Staff says+++++

+++++Russian forces depend on Crimea. Ukraine is turning it into an island.+++++

+++++Ukraine’s special forces disabled the rail bridge feeding Russian-occupied Crimea+++++

+++++Zelensky: If Belarus does not want to participate in the war, it must remove the repeaters for Russian drones, otherwise Ukraine will do it+++++

Ukrainian forces strike railway bridges in Crimea and other targets – Ukrainian General Staff, photo

Russia mistakenly strikes own refinery in Moscow, sending massive roof through air like a flying saucer, amazing video shows

US senators propose using frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine's military

Ukrainian Drone Strike Destroys Most Storage Tanks at Ust-Labinsk Oil Depot

The Raid Regiment struck the only gas storage facility in Crimea

In Crimea, after a drone attack, the Tavriyska Thermal Power Plant caught fire – a series of explosions reported

Ukraine launches database of captured Russian weapons

Men Reportedly Rounded Up on Streets in Russia’s Penza Region for War Deployment

Officials in Russia Begin Preparing for Mass Mobilization

From battlefield trophy to allied blueprint: Ukraine opens its Russian arsenal

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Britain’s Censorship Regime Was Always Going To Get People Like Henry Nowak Killed: The U.K.’s Censorship Regime Indulges the Idea That People Who Hold Certain Beliefs Do Not Deserve to Live Freely — Or At All.

2026-06-20T00:05:00.000-04:00

Ethan Wilkinson / Unsplash

Britain’s Censorship Regime Was Always Going To Get People Like Henry Nowak Killed:

The U.K.’s censorship regime indulges the idea that people who hold certain beliefs do not deserve to live freely — or at all.

Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old Briton who died in police custody in December, got a death sentence for a thoughtcrime he never committed.
Newly released bodycam footage of Nowak’s arrest shows police arriving at a residential driveway to find Nowak bleeding on the ground. A Sikh man named Vickrum Digwa, who would eventually be convicted of fatally stabbing Nowak with a blade that only Sikhs are allowed to carry in Britain, falsely claimed to police that Nowak had treated him with racial animus. Evidently believing Digwa’s accusations but not Nowak’s cries for help, the police rolled Nowak’s limp body over and placed handcuffs on his wrists. In response to his repeated pleas for treatment of his stab wounds, police can be heard telling him, “I don’t think you have [been stabbed], mate.” He died moments after police read him his rights as an accused criminal.

Digwa was convicted of murder and was sentenced on Monday. He can be eligible for parole in as few as 21 years. During the trial, the judge concluded “that Nowak had not said anything racist to the Sikh man who killed him,” according to the BBC.

The finding came too late to help Nowak, of course. In his final moments, he was tried, convicted, and sentenced in the minds of the state actors who refused him aid. For years, the British police state has been more concerned with restraining the speech of its citizens than with restraining the disproportionate number of new arrivals who murder and rape them. In December, the officers who responded to Nowak’s slaying made the same calculus.

While British law enforcement turned a blind eye to imported scandals like the now-infamous rape gangs, in which predominantly Pakistani Muslim men abused young British girls for decades with protection from local officials, they cracked down on native Britons for beliefs expressed on the internet, and even those held silently.

The U.K. censorship regime is deadly, and not just because it leaves police with fewer resources to prosecute actual crimes. It’s deadly because it indulges the idea that people who hold certain beliefs do not deserve to live freely — or at all. As an accused racist, Henry Nowak was deemed unworthy of timely and potentially life-saving care, and he was sentenced to bleed out in handcuffs on the street.

It’s the same dogma that got civil liberties advocate Charlie Kirk martyred for his speech last year. Known for being one of the most effective and far-reaching communicators on the right, Kirk’s hallmark was authentic, civil discourse with college students and others who disagreed with him. Leftists enraged by his speech smeared him as a racist and celebrated his assassination publicly because they believed he deserved to die.

Kirk’s assassination was part of a recent explosion of political violence on the American left, ranging from similar assassination attempts to mass riots. President Donald Trump has been the target of multiple assassination attempts; after one recent attack at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in April, bystanders fleeing the scene were greeted by protesters holding signs that urged death on their political opponents. Assassins from coordinated cells of leftist radicals have targeted immigration law enforcement officers in sniper attacks.

Nor is the disposition toward violence limited to members of Antifa cells. Before Virginians elected him attorney general last fall, Democrat Jay Jones was revealed to have fantasized about executing one of his Republican colleagues.

“Gilbert gets two bullets to the head,” Jones wrote of former Virginia House Speaker Todd Gilbert, imagining a hypothetical where he had two bullets and the opportunity to kill Gilbert, Adolf Hitler, or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot. To justify his murderous fantasies, Jones explained why he wished death on Gilbert and his family: “I mean do I think Todd and Jennifer [Gilbert’s wife] are evil? And that they’re breeding little fascists? Yes.”

This idea that some people deserve death for their beliefs is the central premise that motivates left-wing violence. When a Columbia University student gained notoriety for saying his political opponents “don’t deserve to live,” he explained how central that premise is to leftist rhetoric. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Down Syndrome Babies Like My Little Sister-In-Law Are Not Defects To Eliminate: The Tragedy is not Valentina’s Life with Down Syndrome; the Tragedy Would Have Been Never Letting Her Live It

2026-06-20T00:03:00.000-04:00

Courtesy of Michael Alfonso

Down Syndrome Babies Like My Little Sister-In-Law Are Not Defects To Eliminate:

The tragedy is not Valentina’s life with Down syndrome; the tragedy would have been never letting her live it.

The internet got a glimpse of something ancient and ugly creeping back into modern life this week. YouTuber Jesse Ridgway and his wife, Ashley, announced on social media that they had aborted their unborn child after learning the baby might have Down syndrome.
Ridgway, whose post now has more than 21 million views on X alone, defended the decision by pointing to the medical complications often associated with Down syndrome: heart defects, hearing problems, and developmental delays. “Down Syndrome isn’t a ‘blessing,’” he wrote. “It is objectively sh-tty from a health perspective.”

When I read his post, the first person I thought about was my little sister-in-law, Valentina. Valentina, now 6 years old, was born with Down syndrome. She’s had heart surgery and ear surgery — two concerns Ridgway listed. Yet Valentina is the ultimate joy of the Duffy family I married into. She’s the unquestioned favorite among all nine Duffy children. She loves music, having her hair done like her big sisters, and wearing “pretty dresses.”

But when I first learned she would likely have Down syndrome, I didn’t know any of that. Back in 2020, during a date night when my now-wife Evita told me her unborn sister likely had Down syndrome, my reaction, if I’m honest, wasn’t that different from Ridgway’s.

I would never have considered abortion, but I pitied the Duffy family. I thought the news was tragic, and I assumed everyone’s life was about to become harder and sadder. I especially remember thinking Valentina might never live independently.

Today, my in-laws, Sean and Rachel Duffy, affectionately call Valentina their “lifer” because they treasure that, unlike their other children, Valentina will always stay home with them. The Duffy kids actually argue over who will get to take care of Valentina one day when Sean and Rachel are gone.

Looking back now, what strikes me is how instinctively warped my reaction was. I grew up in a Christian, pro-life home. I had a Christian education. I always considered myself pro-life. Yet the beauty and innate dignity of Valentina’s life were not immediately obvious to me.

Why? Because the air we breathe is no longer Christian. It’s pagan.

As Federalist Senior Editor John Daniel Davidson explains in his book Pagan America, the ancient pagan world routinely disposed of weak, disabled, or unwanted children. Romans abandoned “imperfect” infants on roadsides and garbage heaps. The Carthaginians and Aztecs sacrificed children to their gods. In the pagan world, weak lives were burdensome and disposable.

Today, Western countries abort babies diagnosed with Down syndrome at staggering rates, often between 60 and 99 percent. Iceland famously boasts that it has nearly eliminated Down syndrome, with, on average, only one or two babies with Down syndrome born each year. Of course, Iceland didn’t eliminate Down syndrome. It eliminated children with Down syndrome via mass murder.

In countries with socialized medicine, particularly, mothers routinely report pressure from doctors and bureaucrats to abort these babies for the “good” of society. Carrying them to term is treated as irresponsible, selfish, and even cruel. This is paganism resurrected.

The Christian revolution introduced something the ancient world had never known: Imago Dei — the belief that every human being bears the image of God and therefore possesses inherent dignity.

When Christians started rescuing exposed babies left to die outside Roman cities, the Romans were scandalized. To pagan Rome, power determined value. But Christians insisted the helpless, unwanted child was as valuable as the Roman emperor himself.

When Constantine the Great converted to Christianity in 312 A.D., Christians immediately moved to ban the barbaric practice of disposing of infants. Christians built a civilization around the idea that human worth is not earned through intelligence, strength, beauty, productivity, or independence; it is intrinsic.

That same moral inheritance shaped America. It’s no accident the founders wrote in the Declaration of Independence that “our Creator” endowed human beings with certain unalienable rights, beginning with the right to live. The right to life is ordered before liberty and the pursuit of happiness on purpose — because without life, none of the other rights matter. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Republicans Supported Gay Marriage ‘Rights’ Until They Saw It Destroy Children’s Rights: The Law Cannot Simultaneously Uphold Same-Sex Marriage and a Child’s Right to His Mother and Father

2026-06-20T00:01:00.000-04:00

www.kaboompics.com/Pexels

Republicans Supported Gay Marriage ‘Rights’ Until They Saw It Destroy Children’s Rights:

The law cannot simultaneously uphold same-sex marriage and a child’s right to his mother and father.

Conservatives are jumping the gay marriage ship. According to a new Gallup poll, Republican support for same-sex marriage has plummeted from 55 percent in 2021 and 2022 to just 37 percent today.
The reason is simple: Republicans were told that supporting same-sex marriage meant supporting their gay brother, daughter, coworker, or friend. They were told that opposing it meant they hated gay people, and many bought it. If supporting same-sex marriage was simply the price of treating loved ones with dignity and respect, they were willing to pay it.

What they were not told was that same-sex marriage would victimize kids. No sooner had gay marriage been achieved on the grounds that marriage had nothing to do with children than activists, judges, and lawmakers turned around and demanded parenthood too.

Republicans have no interest in persecuting their gay friends and family members. What they reject is the claim that adult equality requires making children lose their mother or father. And after a decade of watching the consequences unfold, it has become obvious that “equal marriage” was never just about adult “rights.” It was about parenthood and children.

‘Parentage’

Justice Anthony Kennedy, author of the Obergefell majority opinion, wrote that same-sex couples needed access to the full “constellation of benefits” associated with marriage. The last decade has proved that children were among those so-called benefits. In the name of constitutional rights, the law had to accomplish what biology prohibits: making two same-sex adults the legal parents of a child. Thus, through the use of language and state force, activists began to meticulously eradicate a child’s mother and father.

In 2017, with Pavan v. Smith, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not treat same-sex couples differently on birth certificates. The presumption of paternity, a centuries-old doctrine designed to unite children with both biological parents whenever possible, was repurposed into a presumption of parentage. A legal tool created to secure a child’s mother and father had become a mechanism for erasing one of them.

Then came the Uniform Parentage Act. A growing number of states have adopted all or part of the Uniform Parentage Act, a sweeping legal framework designed to redefine parenthood itself. Previously, the right to take a vulnerable infant home from the hospital was recognized on two grounds: a biological relationship or proof of having undergone significant screening, vetting, and background checks to ensure the adoptive parents would love and cherish that child as if he or she had been born to them. Under the UPA, however, an “intent” to parent and a state-backed contract allowed unrelated adults to purchase children under the umbrella of constitutional requirements.

I watched this happen firsthand in Washington state in 2018, when Democrat state Sen. Jamie Pedersen, a gay “married” father of four boys he commissioned via surrogacy, helped author and pass Washington’s Uniform Parentage Act. That law totally rewrote parentage law and legalized commercial surrogacy in the state. The overhaul scrubbed “mother” and “father” from Washington parenthood statutes, made new pathways for unrelated adults to acquire children without undergoing background checks, and explicitly allowed payments from intended parents to birth or genetic parents. In any other context, the exchange of money for parental rights would be regarded as trafficking.

Even Pedersen admitted that all of these changes flowed directly from the legalization of gay marriage. Like I’ve often repeated, Obergefell commodified children. Once husbands and wives became optional, mothers and fathers became optional too.

Parenthood statutes are being stripped of sexed terms. Mothers and fathers are now interchangeable “parents.” Infertility is being reclassified so same-sex couples can deliberately produce motherless or fatherless children with the help of insurance subsidies. Birth certificates have been altered to legally exclude a child’s biological parent. New parentage pathways bypass both biological and adoptive safeguards. It is the legal obliteration of the nuclear family. When familial distinctions are erased, children become items to be awarded by state-enforced contract.

The madness has not stopped. Even now, New York Democrats are advancing legislation that continues to scrub sex-specific parentage language from state law. New York legalized commercial surrogacy through its version of the UPA, the ironically named Child-Parent Security Act. Now lawmakers are cleansing the remaining statutory code so the language matches the new reality they created, replacing longstanding mother-and-father terminology with sex-neutral parentage concepts.

That’s because if you can’t name it, you can’t legally defend it. And gay activists regard even the mention of mothers and fathers as an attack on their “rights.”

Undeniable Consequences --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Why Doesn’t America Denaturalize In The Thousands Like It Used To? There Needs to be a Massive Denaturalization Effort to Rectify the Mistaken Awards of Citizenship Over the Past 60 Years

2026-06-19T00:09:00.000-04:00

Edmond Dantes/PEXELS

Why Doesn’t America Denaturalize In The Thousands Like It Used To?

There needs to be a massive denaturalization effort to rectify the mistaken awards of citizenship over the past 60 years.

One of the policy goals conservatives most want the Trump administration to accomplish is mass deportations. Not just for illegals or those who have committed crimes, but also for those who have been granted citizenship and have proven themselves civilizationally unequipped to retain the privilege.
Earlier this week, the Department of Justice announced denaturalization actions against 17 persons “accused of serious offenses.” Almost all of the cases involve either some kind of fraud or the sexual abuse of a minor. In May, the department announced similar actions against 12 people accused of “terrorist support, war crimes, espionage, sexual abuse, and more.”

While it is important to remove every single person that matches those criteria in the country, periodical numbers like 17 and 12 do not seem to match expectations of the many more who might be — or should be — eligible for denaturalization and, ultimately, deportation.

Between 1907 and 1967, 22,000 citizens were denaturalized (an average of about 367 per year), which is reportedly more than any other democracy in the world at the time. There were other rules governing citizenship as well, such as women marrying foreign men automatically losing citizenship or anyone voting in a foreign election being stripped of the privilege as well. One could be denaturalized for supporting government regimes antithetical to the American constitutional order.

But none of that is the case anymore. From 1990 to 2018, only 130 denaturalization proceedings had been filed (or, seven per year on average). The downturn on denaturalization came at a time when there are exponentially more persons granted citizenship who have proven themselves unworthy of it.

Throughout American history, “the use of denaturalizing people has ebbed and flowed — it’s not quick, it’s not easy to do,” Lora Ries, Director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage Foundation, told The Federalist. Ries explained that judges will often decide not to denaturalize citizens, even when they deserve it.

Denaturalization decisions are determined by federal courts, not immigration courts. However, similar to the way that immigration judges are “loath to deport aliens with green cards, even though lawful permanent residents are indeed deportable,” Ries said, “imagine the resistance to strip citizenship away.”

Denaturalizing was not always as difficult as it is now. Clear-cut cases of fraud or sexual abuse like the ones highlighted by the Department of Justice are the most likely to succeed in denaturalization, but that is mostly because a Supreme Court case from 1967 effectively removed the sovereign right of the United States government to strip citizenship, except in certain cases like fraud and abuse.

In Afroyim v. Rusk, a 5-4 majority of the Warren Court decided that the U.S. does not have the authority to revoke anyone’s citizenship involuntarily. The case derived from a man of Polish birth, naturalized in 1926, who voted in the Israeli election in 1951, directly violating the Nationality Act of 1940.

The court held:

Congress has no power under the Constitution to divest a person of his United States citizenship absent his voluntary renunciation thereof.

(a) Congress has no express power under the Constitution to strip a person of citizenship, and no such power can be sustained as an implied attribute of sovereignty, as was recognized by Congress before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment. …

(b) The Fourteenth Amendment’s provision that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States . . . are citizens of the United States …” completely controls the status of citizenship, and prevents the cancellation of petitioner’s citizenship.

The result gave naturalized citizens sovereignty over their citizenship as opposed to the government.

In its ruling, the high court essentially decided it had the power to overrule Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that “The Congress shall have Power … To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.” Rules about “naturalization” clearly also means setting rules about denaturalization, Ries said.

There have been subsequent cases that chip away slightly at the dramatic ruling in Afroyim. For example, Fedorenko v. United States in 1981 allowed denaturalization to occur if the original naturalization was obtained fraudulently — such as through falsifying documents or bogus claims of refugee or asylum. The overall effect of Afroyim, however, has been to make denaturalization extremely difficult to achieve, and under specific, arduous circumstances.

President Bill Clinton’s “Citizenship USA” initiative, which was a 1996 scheme to fast-track as many naturalizations as possible in order to swamp the ballot box with foreigners in favor of Clinton’s reelection, resulted in at least 6,000 foreigners being naturalized despite having criminal histories or other disqualifying factors.

When the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) attempted to pursue administrative denaturalizations, they were stopped by a federal judge, and by 2001, the Department of Justice decided not to challenge for denaturalization in court because of how difficult achieving the seemingly simple task had become.--->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

204 C-Clashes in F-Line: 27 in Pokrovsk Dir, 20 in Huliaipole Dir, 14 in Kostiantynivka Dir; UKR Launches Largest Drone Attack on (MOS)cow Since Start of RU's Full-Scale Invasion; Z: 'MOS will burn' if RU Strikes Continue; SBU: “Safe MOS” is No More; UKR Used Jet-Powered Drones During Massive MOS Attack; UKR Hits MOS Oil Ref, Disrupting Commercial Flights; UKR Eliminates 26 RU Stormtroopers, LIVE UPDATES, DETAILS, and LOTS MORE

2026-06-19T00:07:00.000-04:00

Since the beginning of the day, over 200 battles have taken place at the front, the enemy launched 5,7 thousand drones - General Staff:

Since the beginning of the day, 204 combat engagements have occurred at the front. The enemy carried out three missile strikes and dropped 213 guided air bombs.

In total, since the beginning of this day, 204 combat engagements have occurred on the front. The enemy launched 5.7 thousand drones and dropped 213 guided aerial bombs, UNN reports, citing the General Staff's summary.

The enemy carried out three missile strikes, using nine missiles, conducted 64 airstrikes, dropping 213 guided aerial bombs. In addition, they used 5,797 kamikaze drones for strikes and carried out 2,183 shellings of populated areas and positions of our troops
- the statement reads

On the North-Slobozhanskyi and Kursk directions , five combat engagements occurred; the enemy conducted 60 shellings, including six using multiple launch rocket systems.

On the South-Slobozhanskyi direction , the enemy stormed the positions of our units six times in the areas of Lyman, Starytsia, and towards Izbystske. Two combat engagements are still ongoing.

On the Kupiansk direction , today the enemy attacked the positions of the Defense Forces three times towards Radkivka and Kolisnykivka.

On the Lyman direction , Ukrainian soldiers repelled 13 attempts by the invaders to advance towards the settlements of Shyikivka, Stavky, Drobysheve, Lyman, and in the areas of the settlements of Novoselivka, Derylove, Zarichne, Yampil. Three combat engagements are still ongoing.

On the Sloviansk direction , the Defense Forces repelled 11 attempts by the invaders to advance towards the settlements of Rai-Oleksandrivka, Kryva Luka, and in the areas of Zakitne and Kalenyky.

On the Kramatorsk direction , one combat engagement with the enemy occurred; the enemy was advancing towards Malynivka.

The Defense Forces repelled 14 enemy assaults on the Kostiantynivka direction near the settlements of Pleshchiivka, Kostiantynivka, Illinivka, Toretske.

On the Pokrovsk direction , the enemy carried out 27 attacks. The occupiers attempted to advance in the areas of the settlements of Novooleksandrivka, Kotlyne, Udachne, Rodynske, Novomykolaivka, Filia, and towards the settlements of Bilytske, Dorozhnie, Shevchenko, Serhiivka, Novopavlivka. One combat engagement is ongoing. --->READ MORE HERE

War update: 204 clashes on front line, Pokrovsk direction remains hottest:

There were 204 combat clashes on the front, and in the Pokrovsk direction the enemy carried out 27 attacks on Defense Forces positions, losing more than 60 occupiers.

According to Ukrinform, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine stated this on Facebook as of 22:00 on June 18 2026.

"In total, 204 combat clashes occurred since the beginning of this day. The enemy launched three missile strikes, using nine missiles, carried out 64 airstrikes, dropping 213 guided aerial bombs. In addition, it used 5,797 kamikaze drones and carried out 2,183 shellings of populated areas and positions of our troops," the post said.

According to the General Staff, in the Northern Slobozhanshchyna and Kursk directions there were five clashes; the enemy carried out 60 shellings, including six using multiple launch rocket systems.

In the South Slobozhanshchyna direction, the enemy attacked our units' positions six times in the areas of Lyman and Starytsia and toward Izbytske. Two clashes are still ongoing.

In the Kupiansk direction, the enemy attacked Defense Forces positions three times today toward Radkivka and Kolisnykivka.

In the Lyman direction, Ukrainian soldiers repelled 13 attempts by the invaders to advance toward the settlements of Shyikivka, Stavy, Drobysheve, and Lyman, and in the areas of Novoselivka, Derylove, Zarichne, and Yampil. Three clashes are still ongoing.

In the Sloviansk direction, the Defense Forces repelled 11 attempts by the invaders to advance toward Ray-Oleksandrivka and Kryva Luka, and in the areas of Zakitne and Kalenyky.

In the Kramatorsk direction, there was one clash with the enemy, who advanced toward Malynivka.

The Defense Forces repelled 14 enemy assaults on the Kostiantynivka direction near Pleshchiivka, Kostiantynivka, Illinivka, and Toretsk.

In the Pokrovsk direction, the enemy carried out 27 attacks. The occupiers tried to advance in the areas of Novooleksandrivka, Kotlyne, Udachne, Rodynske, Novomykolaivka, and Filiia, and toward the settlements of Bylytske, Dorozhne, Shevchenko, Serhiivka, and Novopavlivka. One clash is ongoing. --->READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to +++++relevant+++++ and related stories:

+++++Russia-Ukraine News LATEST UPDATES: (REUTERS) (AP) (NY POST) and (WSJ)+++++

+++++Ukraine launches largest drone attack on Moscow since start of Russia's full-scale invasion, hits oil refinery+++++

+++++Zelenskiy says 'Moscow will burn' if Russian strikes continue+++++

+++++“Safe Moscow” is no more – drone strikes are eroding the sense of security felt in Russia’s capital, SBU unit says+++++

+++++Ukraine deployed jet-powered drones during massive Moscow attack+++++

+++++ Ukraine hits Moscow oil refinery, disrupting commercial flights in major drone attack+++++

+++++Ukrainian Forces Eliminate 26 Russian Stormtroopers Near Mala Tokmachka+++++

All airports in Moscow closed due to drone attack

Ukraine to receive long-range artillery, cruise missiles and drone support following Ramstein meeting

EU leaders agree to renew Russia sanctions for 12 months

Fires Break Out at Moscow Refinery and Gukovo Oil Depot Following Ukrainian Drone Strikes

Drone Attack Hits Railway Bridge in Occupied Crimea

In Moscow, a Russian Anti-Aircraft Missile Destroyed an Oil Storage Tank

The Largest-Scale Strike on the Moscow Oil Refinery: What Weapons Were Used and What Was Hit by Ukrainian Defenders

Ukrainian Forces strike bridge in occupied Crimea, Moscow Oil Refinery, other Russian targets overnight

UK to provide 150,000 drones to Ukraine as part of $996 million package

Sweden, Norway and Canada to announce defence package for Ukraine, Sweden says

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

U.S. Pledges to Help Provide the Islamic Republic of Iran With $300 Billion: A New Munich Moment; Trump’s Iran Deal Gives the Islamic Republic Big Wins Up Front — and America Nothing; The 5 Passages of the US-Iran Peace Deal That Worry Critics the Most: ‘Always tries to get more’; Iran’s Crown Prince Warns of What’s Coming

2026-06-19T00:05:00.000-04:00

U.S. Pledges to Help Provide the Islamic Republic of Iran With $300 Billion:

A new Munich moment.

The madness continues. Now we learn that Israel had asked to see the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding before it was made public, and was refused. The MOU, both in what it contains and what it omits, affects the Jewish state’s ability to survive, yet Trump would not let the Israelis see it, because he feared the Israelis would at once object, and rally their Congressional supporters to oppose it. It was better, he thought, to keep Israel out of the loop, so that it couldn’t quote verbatim from the MOU. So he has kept the Jewish state, without whose military intervention the Iranians might never have agreed to a ceasefire with the U.S., in the dark. A whiff of Munich has come wafting from Washington.

We do know some things about the MOU. We know that the “deal” says nothing about curbing Iran’s production of ballistic missiles, which it has recently been launching at both Israel and the Gulf Arab states. It says nothing about Iran ending its support of jihad terror groups — Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen. Israel is not mentioned anywhere in the MOU.

Other facts have leaked out about what is in the agreement, and even those expecting the worst have been amazed at the concessions the United States is prepared to make. More on those new concessions, mainly financial, can be found here: “US commits to rehabilitation of Islamic regime with at least $300 b. in reported leaked MOU,” by Shir Perets, Jerusalem Post, June 16, 2026:

The United States has agreed to work with regional partners to “create a comprehensive plan agreed upon by both parties for the rehabilitation and economic development of the Iranian regime, while ensuring financing of at least $300 billion,” according to a reported draft of the 14-point US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding shared by Al-Arabiya on Tuesday.

According to Reuters, the fund is a private investment vehicle, not a reconstruction or reparations program, and will not include any government money or grants.

Companies based in the US, the Gulf, Asia, South America, and Africa have all agreed to commit financing.

The fund will reportedly assist in fields such as energy, logistics, manufacturing, and transport. Additionally, it is said to be entirely different from the sanctioned $24b., which is discussed in a separate point of the document.

So the US is now committed to help raise $300 billion in foreign investment in Iran. That’s a lot of money, far more than the amount of Iranian assets that the Obama administration unfroze. How many thousands of ballistic missiles, how many tens of thousands of drones, will Iran now be able to build with the amounts it manages to divert from that “investment money”? --->READ MORE HERE

Trump’s Iran deal gives the Islamic Republic big wins up front — and America nothing

Vice President JD Vance’s sales pitch for the Iran deal is simply terrible — but President Trump’s may be worse.

Maybe the reporting on what’s in the memorandum of understanding is wrong, but Team Trump keeps confirming some of the worst news.

As best we can tell, the deal does nothing to achieve the aims America started the war with — but does hand Tehran a whole series of gains.

Iran gets at least a few billion in immediate funds and can start selling oil right away, with at least some other sanctions dropped as well.

Moreover, Tehran wins unprecedented authority over the Strait of Hormuz and likely locks in Hezbollah’s dominance of Lebanon.

Recall our goals: The prez opened combat seeking to permanently end Iran’s nuclear threat, and also eliminate its missiles and other offensive capabilities, and we also hoped for regime change.

The bombing set back its nuke programs, took out a lot of missiles and missile factories and decapitated most of the regime’s top leadership.

All the talks since the start of April have done nothing more — indeed, have only let new Iranian leaders rebuild and regroup, even as the populace suffers.

Why think they’ll change in another 60 days of talking?

Vance’s happy case is that the big prizes for Iran are contingent on its behavior. As he said on “Hannity”: “If they’re willing to behave like a normal country,” quit chasing nukes and funding terror, “then we are willing to actually fundamentally transform our relationship with them.”

But that’s been true ever since the 1979 revolution, and the regime has never gone for it.

Trump, talking with Qatar’s ruler (!), actually claimed the regime has changed, since we killed off so many leaders and those who wound up in charge “are very rational people,” “nice to deal with,” “not radicalized.”

Huh? It’s the leaders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps calling the shots over there now — the goons most committed to the radical agenda.

Vance, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner never talked to them, only to political fronts for the real powers. --->READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to relevant stories:

+++++ The 5 passages of the US-Iran peace deal that worry critics the most: ‘Always tries to get more’+++++

+++++Iran’s Crown Prince Warns of What’s Coming: If Trump’s “deal” goes through, the damage won’t be limited to the America-First president’s legacy.+++++

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Unrest in Belfast: A Near-Beheading Brings British Rage to a Boil; Belfast Burning: And the Media Won't Say Why

2026-06-19T00:03:00.000-04:00

Unrest in Belfast:

A near-beheading brings British rage to a boil.

Belfast, of course, has seen its share of violence in modern times. During the last three decades of the last century, it was Ground Zero for “The Troubles,” during which terrorism between Catholics and Protestants claimed from eight to 480 lives a year. For those of us who lived through that era, it felt like one of those historical conflicts that would last forever, like the Thirty Years’ War. But eventually it did end, and today it can feel like a memory of the distant past, one to which few young people on either side of the Irish/British border can relate.

No, today both the Republic of Ireland and the British region of Northern Ireland are very different places than they were then. It seems only yesterday that both of them were (by Western European standards) poor, tradition-bound, and deeply religious: in the Republic, divorce remained illegal until 1997; in both the Republic and Northern Ireland, abortion was prohibited until 2019. Today, both parts of the island are highly modernized, surprisingly secular, and extremely prosperous: the Republic of Ireland’s GDP per capita is now the fourth highest in Europe.

But not all is paradise on the Emerald Isle. In the Republic as well as in Northern Ireland, the economic progress of recent decades has brought with it, as in other parts of Western Europe, a naive belief that newfound wealth carries with it an obligation to invite hordes of needy, dubious foreigners to share in the largesse. So it is that both Dublin and Belfast, which not long ago were rife with poverty, have become the prosperous hosts to very small but fast-growing Muslim communities: in Dublin, about 37,000 of them, amounting to about a third of one percent of the inhabitants; in Belfast, about 5,000 people, representing about one percent. By current Western European standards, these are very low numbers. For example, you have to go back to around 1985 to find a cohort of Muslims in Oslo that is so small in comparison to the total population.

Even so, the natives have been restless for some time. As Emma Shaw, a Belfast community worker, explained in a BBC interview the other day, many locals resent what they see as the official attitude that immigrants are “entitled to everything when they arrive” and the fact that they’re given access to benefits, government housing, and employment opportunities “that young people from here don’t have.” Now, the people of Belfast have seen what Islam has done elsewhere in Europe, and they know that this kind of thing can only get worse. So why not undo it all while it’s still a relatively easy proposition? It’s one thing to have the natives at each other’s throats, as was the case during the Troubles. But why on earth, once you’re finally attained peace and prosperity, invite more troubles from another part of the world?

For that’s what has happened. On Monday, in yet another recent incident reminiscent of the horrible December 3 murder of Henry Nowak in Southampton, Hadid Alodid, a Muslim immigrant in his thirties, stabbed a man in the head several times in the middle of a street in Belfast before trying to decapitate him. Fortunately for the victim, a local resident named Stephen Ogilvie, who is in his forties, bystanders rushed in to put a stop to the assault. As in the case of Henry Nowak’s killing, a video of the incident went viral online; in it, the perpetrator can be heard shouting “Allahu akbar!” while other voices can be heard screaming; “He’s trying to cut his head off!” The good news is that Ogilvie survived – although he’s entirely lost his left eye, suffered damage to his right eye, and sustained head and back injuries.

After the attack, Alodid was put under arrest and charged with several offenses. Officials also looked into his background, which proved complicated. At first he was described as Somali, then as Sudanese, and finally as a Saudi who relocated to Libya, traveled by boat to France, then flew from Paris to Dublin before crossing the border into the UK in February 2023 and settling in Belfast, where he was granted asylum in the UK until 2028. He appeared in court this past Wednesday, at which time it was revealed that he’d moved in next door to Ogilvie only four days before the attack – and that Ogilvie had helped him move in. Also revealed was that Alodid, upon arrival at a hospital following the assault, boasted “I’ve killed someone”; and when a National Health Service worker tried to help him with an injured hand, Alodid threatened to kill him, too.

Elsewhere in Britain – principally in English cities such as Manchester, Birmingham, Bradford, and of course London – such incidents as the assault on Ogilvie are old news. But in Northern Ireland, they’re a new phenomenon. Not that the butchering of Ogilvie was Ireland’s first encounter with immigrant violence: in 2022, in Sligo, an Iraqi immigrant named Yousef Palani killed and mutilated two gay men, Aidan Moffitt and Michael Snee; last year, two Romanian teenagers sexually assaulted a teenage girl in the Northern Irish town of Ballymena only to end up being let off with no charges. Turmoil ensued. --->READ MORE HERE

Belfast Burning:

And the media won't say why.

Nearly three decades after the end of the Troubles, Belfast, the capital of Northern Ireland, is once again on fire.

On Monday, June 8, a Sudanese “asylum” seeker attacked a local man on the street with a kitchen knife, slashing him across the face and neck. Graphic video of the attack, which blinded the victim in one eye, rapidly spread online. The suspect, identified as Hadi Alodid, has been charged with attempted murder, possession of a knife in a public place, and making threats to kill.

In response, Belfast erupted.

Rioters took to the streets, hurling bricks and bottles at police, torching vehicles, and burning homes in some Belfast neighborhoods with large migrant populations. Police deployed water cannons. Families were forced to flee burning buildings. The Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service responded to 62 incidents in a single night. At least 27 people have been left homeless.

Lest there be any doubt: Arson, mob violence and the burning of innocent people’s homes are all indefensible acts. Mobocracy is here, there and everywhere the enemy of civilization. The masked men who burned out their neighbors for no reason disgraced themselves and their cause.

But that hopefully obvious point aside, here is the question the Western press refuses to ask: Why does this keep happening?

Because it does keep happening. Almost exactly a year ago, Northern Ireland convulsed in riots after two Romanian teenagers were charged with the attempted rape of a schoolgirl in Ballymena. The year before that, riots swept across England itself — Southport, Rotherham, town after town — following a mass stabbing at a girls’ dance class by a Muslim terrorist.

The pattern is not difficult to discern. A horrific crime, or series of crimes, is committed. The perpetrator is a migrant, often some variety of “asylum” seeker. The government responds by condemning the violence of an enraged public while studiously avoiding any reckoning with the underlying policies that generated the crime and the inevitable subsequent rage. The Pravda press dutifully follows the official, regime-approved script.

This week’s coverage has been instructive. The framing in outlet after establishment outlet has been nothing if not predictable: “anti-immigrant violence,” “far-right protesters,” “racist riots.” Northern Ireland’s first minister called the rioters “thugs” but had very little to say about the fact a Sudanese national blinded a constituent in Northern Ireland’s largest city. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the stabbing as “sickening” – fine — but devoted considerably more rhetorical energy to warning that “violence against people based on their background would not be tolerated.” --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Mamdani Distributes Chocolate Condoms to Fight Disease Outbreak: Monkeypox, Measles, Syphilis: the Sickest City Has Got It All

2026-06-19T00:01:00.000-04:00

Mamdani Distributes Chocolate Condoms to Fight Disease Outbreak:

Monkeypox, Measles, Syphilis: the sickest city has got it all.

Zohran Mamdani is promising free grocery stores, free housing and free everything, but the only free thing New Yorkers can really count on getting for free is an infectious disease.
And flavored condoms for the sickest city in America.

Gonorrhea rates in New York City have more than doubled in a decade and syphilis is ‘surging’ statewide. Mamdani’s Department of Health has responded to this crisis by rushing a free supply of lubricant and chocolate flavored condoms.

“Providing high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare services is a priority for the Mamdani Administration,” explained NYC Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services Helen Arteaga, an Ecuadorian immigrant who had been the CEO of a disastrous Queens city hospital where over a dozen patients had died of COVID in one day. “Making safer sex products more accessible to the most affected and vulnerable communities is a critical public health need.”

Councilwoman Pierina Sanchez, a Mamdani ally, explained that the free chocolate flavored condoms were necessary because “inequities persist among women, low-income households, and Black and Latino New Yorkers.”

The free condoms are coming from Karex, a Malaysian company operating under the ONE name in the United States which has been accused of slavery after workers claimed that there were no working toilets and poisonous snakes. That seems a lot more like real inequity than the people who claim to be victims getting free chocolate flavored condoms from the government.

But supplying chocolate flavored condoms to the “vulnerable” doesn’t seem to have helped.

Ahead of the World Cup and Pride Month, New York State’s Department of Health is warning about “a rise in sexual activity and sexually transmitted infections” and offering medications for anyone “with chlamydia, gonorrhea, and/or trichomoniasis to deliver to their sex partner” without the need for an actual doctor visit. And NYC hospitals are on alert for hemorrhagic fevers, RSV, tuberculosis, measles, varicella, hepatitis A, typhoid, malaria, SARS, hantavirus and Ebola, but for any foreign visitors bringing in diseases, that’s a little like sending coals to Newcastle.

Despite a massive public health infrastructure that got a huge shot of steroids during COVID, the city has become ground zero for disease outbreaks so much so that when the CDC recently provided an update on measles outbreaks in the country, New York City was listed separately from New York State: the only city in the country to receive this dubious honor.

And indeed, New York City is on its sixth case of measles so far this year, including one case in Manhattan by a person who had visited Mexico and then stopped by the Met to take in a performance of La Bohème about 19th century hipsters dying of tuberculosis.

Speaking of TB, NYC’s Health Department had marked ‘World Tuberculosis Day’ by confessing to 743 cases in the city along with 10 of the most feared ‘drug resistant strains’ and blaming racism because “TB continued to disproportionately affect non-Hispanic black and Hispanic people”. But whose fault is that when Mamdani’s Health Department is run by Alister F. Martin, a Kamala advisor famous for creating Vot-ER to register patients visiting an ER to vote.

“Sorry Timmy, you’ve got TB. But now that you’re in the ER, let me register you to vote for my political party. The one on the bottom is your ‘Do Not Resuscitate After Election Day’ form.”

Then, lest anyone be concerned about how seriously the NYC Health Department was taking the TB outbreak, it promoted a TB conference that it was co-hosting in New Jersey, where attendees are less likely to get TB, featuring cast members from ‘Moulin Rouge! The Musical.’

Of course, Mamdani’s Health Department has its hands busy with all the diseases, of which measles and TB are just the tip of a very infectious iceberg. After a Legionnaire’s disease outbreak in city buildings in Harlem killed 5 people last year, several residents in Manhattan public housing came down with the disease this year. Residents in public housing were told to stop taking showers and fill up bathtubs very slowly as they try to figure out what’s causing it.

Health officials hadn’t gotten around to issuing this warning until the second person came down with the disease, but that’s a step up from last year when the source of the outbreak turned out to be the site of the New York City Public Health Laboratory: a ‘state of the art’ $454 million glass and steel tower whose bureaucrats would be “tasked with protecting and promoting the health of all New Yorkers and keeping the city at the forefront of disease response and investigation” which instead infected around 100 people with a disease.

New York City residents would have been healthier without blowing half a billion dollars on a new building to stay at the forefront of disease responses by infecting people with the diseases. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

ICE Blasts ‘reckless’ Mamdani, Hochul as Agency IDs Criminal Illegal Migrants Picked Up in NY; 'NYC won't be another Minnesota': Homan Unveils Aggressive ICE Plan; Puts Hochul, Mamdani On Notice

2026-06-18T00:09:00.000-04:00

ICE blasts ‘reckless’ Mamdani, Hochul as agency IDs criminal illegal migrants picked up in NY:

ICE New York City blasted the “reckless” policies of lefty Gov. Kathy Hochul and Mayor Zohran Mamdani Tuesday — as the agency released the identities of some of the criminal illegal migrants it had taken off Empire State streets, including murderers and child sex offenders.

The men, who were in the country illegally from Jamaica, El Salvador, Ecuador and Honduras, have been convicted of vile crimes including murder, rape, sexual abuse of a child under 11, forcible touching of sexual or intimate parts of another person and sexual contact with a person incapable of consent, according to ICE NYC.

“While sanctuary politicians continue to prioritize criminal illegal aliens over law-abiding New Yorkers, our officers are on the front lines every day keeping our communities safe from murderers, rapists and pedophiles that prey on our most vulnerable citizens,” said ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Field Office Director Kenneth Genalo.

“Protecting New Yorkers from criminal illegal aliens will always be a priority for this office. We will never waver in our commitment to arrest criminal illegal aliens and remove them from our country.”

The agency then turned its ire on Hochul and Mamdani for “reckless” anti-ICE policies that “make New York less safe.”

The latest release of identities comes on the heels of Hochul’s successful push to pass legislation preventing cops from partnering with federal immigration authorities, and barring ICE agents from most public places like hospitals and parks.

It also follows a persistent pattern of legislation by Mamdani making it harder for federal agents and local law enforcement to cooperate with President Trump’s illegal immigration crackdown.

“New York City’s Mayor Zohran Mamdani signed an executive order turning New York City into a shield for violent criminal illegal aliens to reoffend and create more innocent victims,” ICE NYC said in a statement.

Shortly after he took office in January, the newly-minted mayor signed an executive order to reinforce sanctuary protections and protect New Yorkers from “abusive immigration enforcement” by the Trump administration.

“Mamdani’s action came after Gov. Kathy Hochul’s legislative proposal to bar local police departments from partnering and cooperating with ICE law enforcement,” the agency added.

The most recent batch of criminal illegal aliens rounded up in the Empire State includes: --->READ MORE HERE

'NYC won't be another Minnesota': Homan unveils aggressive ICE plan; puts Hochul, Mamdani on notice:

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

207 C-Clashes in F-Line: 24 in Pokrovsk Dir, 23 in Huliaipole Dir, 15 in Kostiantynivka Dir; Finland Lifts Decades-Long Ban On Nukes; Trump Claims Moscow Losing More Troops Than UKR, Needs the War to End Due Mounting Casualties; US Allows Waiver on RU Oil to Expire; RU Turns to Sea Imports of Gasoline as Shortages Deepen After UKR Drone Strikes; RU Deploys New Systems to Jam Starlink, UKR Already Destroying Them; UKR Repels 2-Day RU Mech-Off Near Sloviansk, LIVE UPDATES, DETAILS, and LOTS MORE

2026-06-18T00:07:00.000-04:00

207 battles took place at the front, Results of the Defense Forces' work for the evening of June 17:

At the front, the most attacks were in the Pokrovsky and Hulyaipil directions.

This is stated in the summary of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine as of 10:00 p.m.

The enemy carried out 54 air strikes, dropping 173 guided bombs. In addition, it engaged 6,035 kamikaze drones and carried out 2,088 attacks on settlements and positions of our troops.

Situation on the main routes

In the North Slobozhansk and Kursk directions, the enemy carried out 60 attacks, including three using multiple launch rocket systems.

In the South Slobozhansk direction, the enemy stormed the positions of our units seven times in the areas of the settlements of Lyman, Vovchansk and in the direction of Pokalyany and Izbitsky.

In the Kupyansk direction today, the enemy attacked the positions of the Defense Forces five times towards the settlements of Novoplatonivka and Kurylivka.

In the Lyman direction, Ukrainian soldiers repelled 14 attempts by the invaders to advance in the areas of the settlements of Derylove, Zarichne, Novomykhaylivka, Novoselivka and towards Drobyshevy, Ozerny, Shyykivka, Lyman, and Dibrova.

In the Slavyansk direction, 11 attempts by the invaders to advance towards the settlements of Rai-Oleksandrivka, Kryva Luka, and in the Zakitne area were repelled.

The defense forces repelled 15 enemy assaults in the Kostyantynivka direction near the settlements of Kostyantynivka, Illinivka, Ivano-Frankivka, Rusyn Yar, Stepanivka, and towards Novopavlivka. Two clashes are currently ongoing.

In the Pokrovsky direction, the enemy carried out 24 attacks. The occupiers tried to advance in the areas of the settlements of Novooleksandrivka, Kotlyne, Udachne, Molodetske, Rodynske and towards the settlements of Bilytske, Dorozhne, Novy Donbas, Shevchenko, Serhiivka, Muravka, Vilne, Novopavlivka. Three clashes are ongoing. --->READ MORE HERE

War update: 207 combat clashes as nearly quarter of attacks concentrated on Pokrovsk and Huliaipole fronts:

A total of 207 combat engagements were recorded along the front line on June 17, with Russian forces launching 47 attacks on Ukrainian positions in the Pokrovsk and Huliaipole sectors alone.

According to Ukrinform, the information was provided by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in its operational update as of 22:00 on June 17, published on Facebook.

“Since the beginning of the day, there have been 207 combat engagements. The enemy carried out 54 airstrikes, dropping 173 guided aerial bombs. In addition, they deployed 6,035 kamikaze drones and launched 2,088 attacks on populated areas and our military positions,” the military said.

In the Northern Slobozhanshchyna and Kursk sectors, Russian forces conducted 60 attacks, including three using multiple-launch rocket systems.

In the Southern Slobozhanshchyna sector, the enemy launched seven assaults near Lyman, Vovchansk, and toward Pokaliane and Izbytske.

In the Kupiansk sector, Russian troops attacked Ukrainian positions five times toward Novoplatonivka and Kurylivka.

In the Lyman sector, Ukrainian defenders repelled 14 attempts by Russian forces to advance near Derylove, Zarichne, Novomykhailivka, Novoselivka, and toward Drobysheve, Ozerne, Shyikivka, Lyman, and Dibrova.

In the Sloviansk sector, Ukrainian forces thwarted 11 enemy attempts to advance toward Rai-Oleksandrivka, Kryva Luka, and near Zakitne.

No offensive operations were recorded on the Kramatorsk sector.

In the Kostiantynivka sector, Ukrainian forces repelled 15 enemy assaults near Kostiantynivka, Illinivka, Ivanopillia, Rusyn Yar, Stepanivka, and toward Novopavlivka. Two engagements were still ongoing at the time of reporting.

In the Pokrovsk sector, Russian forces carried out 24 attacks. The invaders attempted to advance near Novooleksandrivka, Kotlyne, Udachne, Molodetske, Rodynske, and toward Bilytske, Dorozhnie, Novyi Donbas, Shevchenko, Serhiivka, Muravka, Vilne, and Novopavlivka. Three clashes were still underway. --->READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to +++++relevant+++++ and related stories:

+++++Russia-Ukraine News LATEST UPDATES: (REUTERS) (AP) (NY POST) and (WSJ)+++++

+++++ NATO nation sharing massive border with Russia lifts decades-long ban on nukes+++++

+++++Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump claims Moscow losing more troops than Kyiv as he admits Putin on ‘the offensive’+++++

+++++US quietly allows waiver on Russian oil to expire+++++

+++++Russia Turns to Sea Imports of Gasoline as Fuel Shortages Deepen After Ukrainian Drone Strikes+++++

+++++Russia Deploys New Volna Kupol Garant EW Systems to Jam Starlink, Ukraine Already Destroying Them+++++

+++++Ukrainian Air Assault Forces Repel Two-Day Russian Mechanized Offensive Near Sloviansk+++++

G7 countries to produce long-range missiles in Ukraine

Ukrainian SOF destroy Russian position, capture prisoners in Northern raid

Key railway bridge in occupied Crimea in flames after reported Ukrainian strike

Ukraine war latest: G7 leaders 'ready to consider' granting military production licenses to Ukraine, agree to increase arms deliveries

Crimea will soon become an island due to drone pressure – Defense Minister Fedorov

Russia started war with 41 Tu-22M3 irreplaceable bombers. It may have nine left

Ukraine's Zelenskiy says he spoke to Trump, Macron after G7 summit

Russia’s Shadow Fleet Tanker FINA A Hit in the Black Sea

Hackers Breach Russian Glaz/Groza Combat Control System

General Staff: Russia has lost more than 1 200 soldiers and seven tanks at the front in the last 24 hours

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

India: Muslim Mob Attacks Police While Defying Directive Against Roadside Prayers: Islamic Supremacy and Violation of Infidel Laws; Violent Protest in Kolkata Against Demolition, Namaz Curbs, 20 Held, 3 cops Injured

2026-06-18T00:05:00.000-04:00

India: Muslim Mob Attacks Police While Defying Directive Against Roadside Prayers:

Islamic supremacy and violation of infidel laws.

Muslim crowds protesting restrictions on offering Islamic prayer, namaz, on public roads clashed violently with police at Kolkata’s Muslim-dominated Park Circus seven-point crossing on the evening of Sunday, May 17. The Muslim mob hurled stones and bricks at security personnel and damaged several vehicles, including police and CRPF vehicles, thereby forcing authorities to resort to lathi (baton)-charge operations to contain the mayhem and restore order. According to police officials, at least three police personnel sustained severe injuries during the jihadis’ attack.

The unrest occurred amid growing tensions over state government directives regarding the use of public roads for religious gatherings. The administration recently instructed local authorities and police to prevent large-scale roadside namaz gatherings that disrupt traffic and public access, which had been a regular spectacle on Fridays in the city for the longest time. Officials stated that prayers should be conducted within mosque premises or designated community spaces, rather than on busy roads and intersections. The government also directed police to ensure that loudspeaker sound from religious places, including mosques, remains within prescribed noise limits. The directive immediately triggered strong opposition from several Muslim organizations and local groups.

Tensions had already been brewing since Friday in other Muslim-dominated parts of Kolkata, such as Rajabazar, Topsia, and parts of central Kolkata, where massive Muslim mobs gathered on busy streets to offer Jumma namaz (the Friday congregational prayer) despite restrictions. The previous West Bengal government’s longstanding reluctance to act against such disruptive Muslim crowds, coupled with a pattern of forcing ordinary citizens to accommodate Muslims’ demands, had emboldened them to openly defy official advisories and administrative orders.

Eyewitnesses recounted that roads in Rajabazar were packed with Muslims offering namaz and creating severe traffic disruptions for hours at a stretch on Friday. The situation was so critical that police forces had to be deployed in the area to ensure roads remained accessible, but the skull-capped mob took to the streets in massive numbers, and continued prayers on public roads in defiance of the administration’s order. Videos showing large crowds occupying significant stretches of road during prayer times, intensifying the political and communal debate surrounding the issue, have been widely shared on social media. This defiance escalated into outright jihadist hooliganism by Sunday.

While the protest began as a demonstration against administrative guidelines, it rapidly escalated as Muslims gathered in large numbers near the Park Circus crossing and completely blocked traffic movement. Police and CRPF personnel had already been deployed heavily in anticipation of unrest following Friday’s developments. Authorities attempted to convince demonstrators to vacate the roads and disperse peacefully, but the situation turned violent, and the crowd began throwing stones and bricks at the police. --->READ MORE HERE

Violent protest in Kolkata against demolition, namaz curbs, 20 held, 3 cops injured:

The protest took place at Seven-Point Crossing in the Muslim-dominated Park Circus area amid simmering tension in the city since Friday, when a group of people clashed with police over the government’s ban on offering prayers on roads.

A protest against the recent demolition drive in Tiljala, and the new BJP government’s ban on offering namaz on the roads, turned violent in Kolkata’s Park Circus area on Sunday, leaving three police personnel injured and several vehicles damaged. At least 20 people have been arrested, said police.

The protest took place at Seven-Point Crossing in the Muslim-dominated Park Circus area amid simmering tension in the city since Friday, when a group of people clashed with police over the government’s ban on offering prayers on roads.

The protesters claimed that since the BJP came to power in the state, there has been a “well-planned attempt to undermine the rights of minorities”. They said that recent administrative strictures curbing the use of loudspeakers were aimed at the azan and namaz.

Hours before the protest, the administration had bulldozed shops and stalls near Howrah and Sealdah railway stations late Saturday night.

Former chief minister and TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee took to X to condemn the demolition drives, saying the poor were paying the price of “political arrogance”. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Now Is The Perfect Time For Trump To Strike Down The Left’s Legal Monopoly: Trump is not Introducing Politics into a Neutral Institution; He is Attempting to Level a Field that Has Been Tilted for a Generation; The American Bar Association Is Unfit To Accredit Law Schools, And The Trump Admin Can Stop Them

2026-06-18T00:03:00.000-04:00

Now Is The Perfect Time For Trump To Strike Down The Left’s Legal Monopoly:

Trump is not introducing politics into a neutral institution; he is attempting to level a field that has been tilted for a generation.

On June 8, members of the D.C. Bar elected Joshua Mogil their next president. Mogil is a senior associate at WilmerHale, one of the four firms that sued the Trump Administration and secured a ruling striking down its executive order as unconstitutional retaliation. He spent the Obama and Biden Administrations inside DOJ, including a tour as Deputy Chief of Staff to Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco. He worked under Sally Yates at DOJ and credits her as his professional hero, the Acting Attorney General fired by President Trump in 2017 for refusing to defend his travel ban. His campaign platform was, in his own words, “empowering the D.C. Bar to speak out in support of the rule of law” against what he called “unprecedented attacks on our system of justice.” If you wanted to design the perfect avatar of the partisan legal machine, you could not improve on his resume.

Three weeks before that, on May 14, 2026, the Department of Justice sued the District of Columbia’s Board on Professional Responsibility, which had recommended disbarring Jeff Clark, a former senior Justice Department official, over a letter he drafted in 2020 and never sent. The DOJ suit and Mogil’s election are the latest battles in a multi-front war against one of the most powerful bastions of leftism: lawyers.

Few appreciate that the same profession that has spent a decade pursuing political opponents through disciplinary complaints, novel prosecutions, and ideological licensing requirements also controls who is allowed to practice it. The American legal profession does not lean left by a polite margin. Among the largest firms, Democratic-to-Republican giving runs about 12 to 1, and the rest of the profession leans strongly left as well. This is the talent pool from which judges, prosecutors, regulators, and a vast share of legislators are drawn, and the bodies that regulate them are more uniform still.

The American Bar Association (ABA) is the sole federally recognized accreditor of American law schools; in most states, you cannot sit for the bar unless your school carries its blessing. For years, ABA Standard 206 obliged those schools to prove a “commitment to diversity and inclusion” in admissions and hiring, defined by race, gender, and ethnicity. Schools complied because losing accreditation is death. Then the political weather turned: a January 2025 order against DEI, a February letter from the attorney general warning that the ABA’s accreditor status was under review, and an April order aimed squarely at that status.

The ABA suspended the standard within weeks and voted formally to strike it in May 2026. An ABA council member, a former dean, allowed that he still personally agreed with the diversity mandate “and what it tries to achieve,” but thought it appropriate to remove it anyway.

This is the same machinery that jammed diversity mandates into every accredited law school under Obama, now being pried loose under Trump. For 15 years, the profession was happy to wield compulsory ideology as long as it flowed one way. The objection on offer today is not to coercion. It is losing the monopoly on it. Trump is not introducing politics into a neutral institution; he is attempting to level a field that has been tilted for a generation.

Second front: discipline, the same machine in reverse. John Eastman is facing disbarment in California, Jeff Clark in D.C. Grant, for argument’s sake, that both men’s post-election conduct warranted real scrutiny. The 65 Project, launched after the 2020 election, exists expressly to file bar complaints against lawyers tied to one political movement, on the stated theory that menacing a lawyer’s license deters disfavored advocacy. Complaints were aimed at U.S. attorneys and a sitting attorney general. These complaints generally beget a process by, you guessed it, an apparatus run by Democrats. The chilling is not a side effect. It is the goal.

Third front: the firms. In 2025, the administration issued executive orders against major firms tied to its opponents, threatening clearances and federal contracts. Several of the largest folded at once. Paul Weiss pledged $40 million in pro bono work for favored causes and an audit of its hiring; Skadden, Willkie, Milbank, and others followed at $100 million apiece, the pledges eventually totaling nearly $1 billion. Trump called the haul “damages.”

There is real risk that the firm campaign becomes a Pyrrhic victory. Nearly five months later, reporting found little sign that the deals had changed how the capitulating firms actually operate. The firms chose their own penance, defined it vaguely, and then largely declined to perform it.

Worse, the pro bono delivered after the settlement has often pointed in the opposite direction. Latham & Watkins, one of the nine settling firms, took on the defense of major media outlets in a defamation suit brought by Trump Media, the President’s own company, six months after signing its pledge. Paul Weiss, which committed $40 million to causes the administration supports, has continued the longstanding pro bono campaigns its chair personally helped found, including high-profile litigation against right-wing figures and firearms manufacturers. The capitulation produced a press release. The pro bono kept flowing exactly where it had been flowing all along.

Meanwhile, the four firms that refused to kneel and sued instead, Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, Susman Godfrey, won in court and watched the orders against them struck down as unconstitutional retaliation. The rulings came from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where Democratic voter registration runs at roughly 76 percent, and Democratic-appointed judges dominate the bench. Which is exactly why the upstream fight, where the same partisan apparatus is the institution itself and not the referee, is the harder and more important war. --->READ MORE HERE

Follow link below to a relevant story:

+++++The American Bar Association Is Unfit To Accredit Law Schools, And The Trump Admin Can Stop Them+++++

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Here Are The Biggest Outstanding Supreme Court Cases To Keep An Eye Out For

2026-06-18T00:01:00.000-04:00

FormalDude/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 4.0

Here Are The Biggest Outstanding Supreme Court Cases To Keep An Eye Out For:

Here are the biggest remaining cases to keep an eye out for as the high court finishes its 2025 term.

Americans across the country are gearing up to celebrate the country’s 250th birthday. But before that happens, the U.S. Supreme Court will release several high-profile decisions of great constitutional importance.
From presidents’ power over so-called “independent agencies” to the constitutionality of “birthplace citizenship,” here are the biggest remaining cases to keep an eye out for as the high court finishes its 2025 term.

National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission

This case stems from a 2022 lawsuit brought by the National Republican Senatorial and Congressional Committees and then-Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, and then-Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, against the Federal Election Commission (FEC) over a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). They alleged that the provision — which limits coordinated spending campaign between political parties and candidates — violates the First Amendment.

The Supreme Court will determine whether the FECA limits violate the First Amendment “either on their face or as applied to party spending in connection with ‘party coordinated communications,’” according to Oyez.

[READ: Campaign Finance And The First Amendment Take Center Stage At SCOTUS]

Trump v. Slaughter

This case centers around President Trump’s March 2025 firing of Democrat Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

While granting the Trump administration’s request to temporarily pause a lower court blockade on Slaughter’s removal, the high court also agreed to take up and address whether existing statutory restrictions on the president’s ability to remove members of so-called “independent agencies” like the FTC violate existing separation of powers. The justices also notably indicated they will decide whether to overturn the precedent established in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935).

As The Federalist previously reported, Humphrey’s Executor “helped birth what has now become known as the administrative state,” the de-facto “fourth branch of government” comprised of “independent agencies” and other federal departments that has “effectively been allowed to operate outside of the confines of the Constitution for decades.”

[READ: SCOTUS Appears Poised To Recognize That Presidents Run The Executive Branch]

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

These cases deal with the legality of state laws passed by Idaho (Little v. Hecox) and West Virginia (West Virginia v. B.P.J.) that protect women’s sports from trans-identifying males. Attorneys, Republican attorneys general, and female athletes have all highlighted how males’ distinct biological advantage over women puts them at a competitive advantage over female athletes and imposes physical risks to their safety.

The justices will address the question of whether these statutes violate the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, or, in the West Virginia case, Title IX.

[READ: SCOTUS Signals Willingness To Uphold State Laws Protecting Women’s Sports]

Trump v. Cook

This case deals with President Trump’s August 2025 removal of Democrat Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. The president fired Cook due to allegations that she committed mortgage fraud prior to her time at the agency.

Following a lower court blockade, the administration asked the Supreme Court to pause such actions so that Cook could be removed from her position while litigation on the matter continued. In agreeing to take up the case, the high court deferred on ruling on the government’s request until after it heard oral arguments on the issue, which were held in January.

[READ: SCOTUS Sends Mixed Signals On Trump’s Removal Of Federal Reserve Member]

Wolford v. Lopez

This case came to fruition in 2023, when a coalition of Hawaii residents and a firearms organization challenged the Aloha State’s “vampire rule” restricting citizens with a concealed carry permit from carrying on private property open to the public unless they receive authorization to do so from the property owner, lessee, or manager. The plaintiffs argued that the law infringes on their Second Amendment rights.

The justices will decide whether Hawaii “may presumptively prohibit the carry of handguns by licensed concealed carry permit holders on private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively gives express permission to the handgun carrier.”

[READ: SCOTUS Scolds Hawaii For ‘Relegating’ Americans’ Second Amendment Rights To ‘Second-Class Status’]

U.S. v. Hemani

This case came about after FBI agents conducted a search on Texas resident Ali Danial Hemani’s home on suspicions that he held ties to a foreign terrorist group. While carrying out the search, authorities found that Hemani was in possession of a pistol, 60 grams of marijuana, and 4.7 grams of cocaine.

Hemani reportedly admitted to being a regular marijuana user and was subsequently charged under a provision (18 U.S. Code § 922(g)(3)) of the 1968 Gun Control Act that prohibits a person who is “an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” from possessing a firearm. Hemani challenged the provision’s legality, arguing that it violated his constitutional rights.

Following litigation in the lower courts, the federal government asked the Supreme Court to take up the case and determine whether the statute violates the Second Amendment as applied to Hemani.

[READ: Gun Restriction At The Heart Of Hunter Biden Indictment Takes Center Stage At SCOTUS]

Watson v. Republican National Committee

This case deals with a 2024 lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee and the Mississippi GOP against a Mississippi election law. The plaintiffs specifically contested that a state law allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be accepted up to five days after Election Day violates existing federal laws establishing an election day for federal contests.

[READ: Supreme Court Voices Skepticism About States Accepting Mail-In Ballots After Election Day]

The justices will decide whether these federal statutes preempt states like Mississippi from enacting such laws.

[RELATED: California’s Latest Election Mess Demands Supreme Court Cleanup] --->READ MORE HERE (4 more cases)

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

ICYMI: Wild Coast Guard Photo Shows 240 Illegal Migrants Packed Onto Tiny, Sinking Boat; Overcrowded Migrant Vessel with 240 People On Board Intercepted Near Turks and Caicos

2026-06-17T00:09:00.000-04:00

Wild Coast Guard photo shows 240 illegal migrants packed onto tiny, sinking boat:

A rickety boat intercepted on the high seas was so overloaded with 240 Haitian immigrants that it was starting to sink when the US Coast Guard spotted it, the agency said Thursday.

The illegal passengers are seen literally clinging to the edge of the boat and resemble sardines in a can in shocking pics taken by Coast Guard choppers before the craft was cut off Sunday near the Turks and Caicos islands in the Caribbean, the maritime enforcement and rescue agency said in a release.

Night-vision video footage of the operation shows a small Coast Guard boat moving in on the packed “unlawful migrant voyage” as the craft as it bobbles in the water about 15 miles south of the islands.

“The successful interdiction and safe removal of these individuals from a perilous situation was made possible by the close collaboration and swift response of the Coast Guard, [US Customs and Border Protection Air and Marine Operations] personnel, and authorities from the Turks and Caicos Islands,” said Lt. Chelsea Garcia, Guard deputy director of Operations Bahamas Turks and Caicos.

“We strongly advise anyone considering participating in an unlawful maritime migration attempt to reconsider. These journeys are extremely hazardous, frequently involving severely overcrowded and unseaworthy vessels that are often taking on water and lack basic life-saving equipment.” --->READ MORE HERE

CBP

Overcrowded migrant vessel with 240 people on board intercepted near Turks and Caicos:

Passengers claimed Haitian nationality as the overcrowded boat was secured and towed by responding crews

An overcrowded migrant vessel carrying 240 people and taking on water was intercepted near the Turks and Caicos Islands after authorities raced to prevent a potential maritime disaster.

The U.S. Coast Guard said it conducted a joint operation Sunday with U.S. Customs and Border Protection Air and Marine Operations and the Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force (RTCIPF) to stop a vessel carrying hundreds of migrants who claimed Haitian nationality.

According to a Coast Guard news release, authorities received a report of "an unlawful migrant voyage" approximately 15 miles south of the Turks and Caicos Islands.

Video released by the Coast Guard shows responding crews assisting local authorities as they secured and towed the overcrowded vessel.

The Turks and Caicos Islands Border Force later took custody of the vessel and its passengers, the Coast Guard said.

More than 140 personnel participated in the operation, according to the agency.

"The successful interdiction and safe removal of these individuals from a perilous situation was made possible by the close collaboration and swift response of the Coast Guard, CBP AMO personnel, and authorities from the Turks and Caicos Islands," Lt. Chelsea Garcia, deputy director of Coast Guard Operations Bahamas and Turks and Caicos, said in a statement. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

182 C-Clashes in F-Line: 38 in Pokrovsk Dir, 24 in Huliaipole Dir, 12 in Kostiantynivka Dir; (T)rump Agrees ‘Russia is not winning’ in UKR and is Open to ‘help us more,’ Z Says; Trump Signals Swift Return of Sanctions on RU Oil; War-Weary RU is Falling Apart; ISW: RU Fakes Flag-Raising Videos in Kostyantynivka; UKR Strikes RU Base in Donetsk, 11 Other RU Targets in Occ-Terr; UKR Hits Moscow’s largest Oil Ref, LIVE UPDATES, DETAILS, and LOTS MORE

2026-06-17T00:07:00.000-04:00

At the front - 182 clashes, the Armed Forces of Ukraine-similized over 70 occupiers in the Pokrov directionske:

In afternoon, in the 182 streets from 182 clashes between the Ukrainian Defense Forces and Russian invaders at the front, 40 of in the first We take direction.

As Ukrinform reports, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine this on Facebook , publishing a a summary of the situation as of 10:00 p.m.

"In total, 182 comashes photospice to the current day. The against the out of the 53 air strikes with 163 guided bombs, half 6.759 kamikaze drones for strikes, w and out 2,029 shelling of the positions of our troops and cases," the report.

The prop not do code offensive operations in the North Slobozhansk and Kursk directions . At the very time, the occupiers of the two main air guideds by six carry arms and out 43 shelling of the positions of our settlements and.

In the South Slobozan direction, the Defense Forces repelled three attacks by invaders near the settlements of Hraniv, Izbitske, and Zybyne. One clash is ongoing still.

In the Kupyansk direction, Ukrainian soldiers prop step three attempts advance to the atose of podol and Borivska Andriivka.

In the Lyman direction, 11 anti-s campaigns on the photo. Our super super defenders reclepressed tenactions assault at Zarichny, Andriivka, Drobyshevy, Lyman, Dibrova, and in the Ozerny area. One clash invest is.

In the Slavyansk direction, the ust tried ninetime to the pie of our defenses in the areas of Kalenykiv, Zakitne and the settlements of Kryva Luka, Mykolaiv, and Rai-Oleksandrivka. All attacks on all repelled.

In the Kramatorsk direction, one action by the occupiers is the photo near the town of Chasiv Yar.

In the Kostyanyntynivka direction, the invaders out of 12 attacks near the settlements of Pleshiivka, Ivanopillya, Illinivka and direction in the of Kostyantynivka, Mykolaipilya, and Dovha Balka.

In the Pokrovsky direction, 38 actions of the thee beketagraphs since the beginning of the day. Ukrainian mad shields already backled 37 attacks in the areas of Rodinske, Novooleksandrivka, Shevchenko, Kotlyne, Udachny and on Dorozhne, Vasylivka, Filia, Novyy Shakhovye, Vilny, Kubycher Yar, Byl, Byl, Nykanorivka, Novyy Donbas. One clash invest is. --->READ MORE HERE

Since the beginning of the day, over 180 combat engagements have been recorded, the enemy launched 6.7 thousand drones - General Staff on the situation at the front:

During the day, 182 combat engagements took place and 6,759 drone attacks were recorded. The enemy attacked most frequently in the Pokrovsk and Huliaipole directions.

In total, 182 combat clashes have been recorded on the front during the current day. The enemy launched 6.7 thousand drones and dropped over 160 guided aerial bombs, UNN reports, citing the General Staff summary.

The aggressor carried out 53 airstrikes using 163 guided aerial bombs, deployed 6,759 kamikaze drones for strikes, and conducted 2,029 shellings of our troops' positions and settlements
- the summary states

In the Pivnichno-Slobozhanskyi and Kursk directions , the enemy did not conduct offensive operations. At the same time, the occupiers carried out three airstrikes using six guided aerial bombs and conducted 43 shellings of our troops' positions and settlements.

In the Pivdenno-Slobozhanskyi direction , the Defense Forces repelled three attacks by the invaders near the settlements of Graniv, Izbytske, and Zybyne. One combat clash is still ongoing.

In the Kupyansk direction , Ukrainian warriors stopped three enemy attempts to advance toward the settlements of Podoly and Borivska Andriivka.

In the Lyman direction , eleven enemy attacks were recorded. Our defenders successfully repelled ten assault actions near Zarichne, Andriivka, Drobysheve, Lyman, Dibrova, and in the area of Ozirne. One combat clash continues.

In the Slovyansk direction , the enemy attempted to wedge into our defense nine times in the areas of Kalenyky, Zakitne, and toward the settlements of Kryva Luka, Mykolaivka, and Rai-Oleksandrivka. All attacks were repelled.

In the Kramatorsk direction , one assault action by the occupiers was recorded near the city of Chasiv Yar.

In the Kostiantynivka direction , the occupiers carried out twelve attacks near the settlements of Pleshchiivka, Ivanopillia, Illinivka, and in the direction of Kostiantynivka, Mykolaipillia, and Dovha Balka.

In the Pokrovsk direction , 38 assault actions by the aggressor have been recorded since the beginning of the day. Ukrainian defenders have already repelled 37 attacks in the areas of Rodynske, Novooleksandrivka, Shevchenko, Kotlyne, Udachne, and toward Dorozhnie, Vasylivka, Filiia, Nove Shakhove, Vilne, Kucheriv Yar, Bilytske, Nykanorivka, and Novyi Donbas. One combat clash continues. --->READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to +++++relevant+++++ and related stories:

+++++Russia-Ukraine News LATEST UPDATES: (REUTERS) (AP) (NY POST) and (WSJ)+++++

+++++Trump agrees ‘Russia is not winning’ in Ukraine and is open to ‘help us more,’ Zelensky says+++++

+++++Trump signals swift return of sanctions on Russian oil as G7 refocuses on Ukraine+++++

+++++Opinion: War-weary Russia is falling apart+++++

+++++Russia uses AI to fake flag-raising videos in Kostyantynivka+++++

+++++Ukrainian USF strike Russian base in Donetsk, 11 other enemy targets in occupied territories+++++

+++++Ukraine strikes Moscow’s largest oil refinery, 15 kilometers from the Kremlin+++++

Zelensky meets with G7 leaders behind closed doors to discuss the war in Ukraine

Ukraine has officially approved 1,000 pieces of weaponry for service in 2026 so far

Reuters: President Zelensky showed Trump a photo of the consequences of the Russian strike on the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra on May 15

Fuel shortages reach Moscow and St. Petersburg as Ukraine’s strikes squeeze Russian refining

"Russia should make a deal": Trump after meeting with Zelenskyy in France

Drones Strike Oil Depot in Krasnodar Krai; Palkino Pumping Station Burns in Russia’s Yaroslavl Region

Ukrainian Defense Forces Strike Bridge in Novoazovsk Near Russian Border

Ukraine has created a DART missile for launch from balloons — it is resistant to electronic warfare

Russia's foreign election meddling has a losing record. Experts explain why

Russians have built two embankments across the Crimean Canal near Armyansk

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

After the San Diego Attack, Hamas-Linked CAIR Looked Everywhere But at its Own Rhetoric: A Familiar Deceptive Script

2026-06-17T00:05:00.000-04:00

After the San Diego Attack, Hamas-Linked CAIR Looked Everywhere But at its Own Rhetoric:

A familiar deceptive script.

When a mosque was attacked, advocacy groups rushed to blame “Islamophobia” in America. The rhetoric in their own backyard went largely unexamined — and much of the media seemed comfortable leaving it there.
There is no excuse for murder. No justification for threatening children, and no defense for attacking a mosque. Those things should be stated plainly, and they are.

But they should not serve as a shield against harder questions — including questions about the ideological climate much closer to home.

In the days following the deadly shooting outside the Islamic Center of San Diego, officials of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)and allied activists moved quickly to establish a narrative: this was the product of “Islamophobia,” political rhetoric, and a cultural climate that had normalized hostility toward Muslims.

The narrative settled into place fast.

What did not arrive — not in local coverage, not in national pickup — was any serious examination of the rhetoric circulating within parts of the same activist and religious ecosystem directly connected to the story.

The omission repeated itself across outlet after outlet.

After a while, it stopped looking accidental.

A Verdict Before a Motive

Investigators had not yet established why the shooter acted when CAIR figures began explaining it publicly.

Zahra Billoo, executive director of CAIR’s San Francisco Bay Area chapter, was unequivocal: “There’s a lot of concern that our elected officials have been contributing to what got us here.”

She also noted, pointedly, that many of those now condemning the attack had stayed silent during what she described as Israel’s “genocide” in Gaza — folding a separate political grievance into a moment of grief before the facts of the shooting were even public.

CAIR national deputy director Edward Ahmed Mitchell went further: “Anti-Muslim hate is out of control in this country. This was the predictable result of it.”

CAIR’s Ahmed Rehab urged leaders to stand against “otherizing, dehumanizing hate mongering.”

Across interviews, the implication was basically the same: American political culture helped produce the violence. Elected officials bore responsibility. The climate made violence inevitable.

That may be true. Rhetoric can shape behavior, and the argument that hostile political language creates danger for vulnerable communities is not frivolous. But the people making that argument showed little interest in applying the same standard inward.

The Context No One Mentioned

Imam Mohamed Taha Hassane of the Islamic Center of San Diego is not a peripheral figure in this story. He has publicly championed CAIR’s activism, and appeared alongside CAIR representatives on multiple occasions. He also serves as a religious adviser to the Muslim Students Association at UC San Diego — an organization critics and researchers have long associated with Muslim Brotherhood activism in North America.

After October 7, Hassane delivered remarks that were not, by any reasonable reading, ordinary political commentary:

When people are occupied, then the resistance is justified. Resistance becomes a human right.

We cannot accuse somebody who is fighting for his life to be a terrorist.

This is not ordinary political rhetoric. It treats “resistance” as morally self-justifying, while pushing questions about violence and terrorism into the background.

Whatever one thinks of the underlying politics, that kind of rhetoric is not irrelevant to a discussion about terrorism.

None of it appeared in the coverage.

Viewers were presented with the imam’s community as a target. Never as a place where ideas that can lead to jihad activity were also in circulation.

Questions the Coverage Never Asked
The ideological context extends beyond sermons. Institutions connected to the activist ecosystem surrounding the Islamic Center of San Diego have also faced scrutiny over educational materials — specifically, textbooks that the Islamic Services Foundation, which has been associated with Islamic schools and curricula across the United States, has produced.

Some of the cited passages are notable. One textbook describes non-believers as “the worst of creatures” destined for hellfire. (That’s straight from the Qur’an, 98:6.) Another warns they “may be next.” A third frames Muslim decline as the consequence of abandoning jihad. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

After Beheading Attempt In Ireland, New York Times Says The Real ‘Violence’ Is From Right-Wingers: The Outlet Called the Protestors in Belfast ‘far-right radicals,’ But Called BLM Protestors ‘peaceful protestors with “room for rage.”‘

2026-06-17T00:03:00.000-04:00

David Coleman/PEXELS

After Beheading Attempt In Ireland, New York Times Says The Real ‘Violence’ Is From Right-Wingers

The outlet called the protestors in Belfast ‘far-right radicals,’ but called BLM protestors ‘peaceful protestors with “room for rage.”‘

After a Sudanese national apparently attempted to brutally behead a man in Belfast, Ireland, The New York Times on June 10 claimed the real concern was “anti-immigrant sentiment,” not how the U.K.’s open border policies enabled the attack.
Video from the attack, which went viral on social media, shows the migrant attacking a native U.K. citizen named Steven Ogilvy in an apparent attempted beheading. The New York Times (NYT) article does not describe the attack until four paragraphs in, and does not use the word “beheading” once. The article also buries information about the suspect, including the fact that he was a Sudanese who may have fraudulently claimed refugee status, in the eleventh paragraph.

The NYT decided this story was less about why the perpetrator of this brutal attack was in Northern Ireland, and more about the response of the “far-right,” a group in which the outlet places Elon Musk, who infamously has children with multiple women and supports transhumanism. To the New York Times, the story is that some people took notice of violent crime by criminal aliens. It’s the classic “Republicans pounce” trope that blames the people who notice the negative effects of leftist policies rather than blaming the policies.

According to the NYT, “far-right” figures “spread misinformation and speculation about the attacker online.” Unsurprisingly, the outlet does not elaborate what this misinformation entails.

A Sudanese migrant was able to enter the United Kingdom, claim asylum, and stay in the country long enough to allegedly attempt to behead a native-born citizen. “The right” doesn’t need to invent this story. The facts speak for themselves.

BREAKING:

The asylum seeker who sparked huge riots in Belfast by trying to behead a local has been named as Hadi Alodid.

He’s from Khartoum in Sudan. The city is currently under control of the Muslim Brotherhood-allied Sudanese Armed Forces. Beheadings are an Islamist specialty pic.twitter.com/6CmI4gpgAt
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) June 10, 2026

The NYT also used plenty of euphemistic language to describe the attack. Instead of describing it as an attempted beheading, the outlet stated: “the attacker moves his hands near the neck of the victim.”

A local resident who witnessed the attack described her experience quite differently, saying she had “never seen anything like it.” The woman told BBC News NI that she was “shaking in the street” while calling police, and that she is now afraid to walk to the store alone. Her reaction is understandable for someone who witnessed a gruesome murder attempt — which is not merely some sort of nondescript hand motion.
Rather than show concern for the victims and bystanders of such violent crimes, the Times focuses more on the worries of immigrants: “Immigrant communities in Northern Ireland said they were living in fear.” Never mind the fear of native citizens who don’t recognize their own country anymore and are banned from noticing that it’s not the native-born who are most likely to commit these kinds of barbaric crimes. --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

The Big Lie of Blaming U.S., Israel for Islamic Child Rape in Gaza and Afghanistan: Muslim Men Selling Their Daughters into Sex Slavery Isn’t Our Fault, It’s Islam’s Fault

2026-06-17T00:01:00.000-04:00

The Big Lie of Blaming U.S., Israel for Islamic Child Rape in Gaza and Afghanistan:

Muslim men selling their daughters into sex slavery isn’t our fault, it’s Islam’s fault.

Last month, the BBC ran a story about Afghan men selling daughters as young as five years old into the sex slavery known as Islamic marriage. Rather than blaming the Koran and the example set by Islam’s pedophile founder Mohammed who married his most prominent ‘wife’ Aisha at the tender age of seven, the radical state media outlet instead blamed the Trump administration.
The BBC complained that “the US – once the top donor to Afghanistan – cut nearly all aid to the country last year” without explaining that the aid was cut because the money was going through the UN to the Taliban which is once again hosting Al Qaeda and aiding Islamic terrorists.

Selling girls into sex slavery was a common practice in Afghanistan specifically and Islam in general not only before the U.S. invasion after 9/11, but before the existence of the U.S. These are cultural behaviors in Islamic and Afghan culture that the media is too terrified to criticize.

The media knows better because it’s been covering stories about Afghans selling little girls into sex slavery going back decades. There were stories about the sale of three-olds into sex slavery in 2021, before the end of U.S. aid, the sale of 8-year-olds back in 2007, and 10-year-olds in 2003.

An NBC News story from 2007 headlined “Afghan girls traded like currency to settle debts”, described how a man sold his daughter in exchange for 9 sheep, another in which a taxi driver who hit and killed a boy bought an 11-year-old girl and gave her in exchange to the dead boy’s relatives, and the girl was then killed, none of which had to do with U.S. foreign aid.

The NBC story quoted the Afghan government stating that “roughly two out of five Afghan marriages are forced” and an NGO that “investigated about 500 cases of girls given in marriage to settle blood feuds.” That’s not about Afghanistan’s regular fake ‘famines’ or about foreign aid.

Girls are being sold and traded because they’re considered property in Islam. It’s why the UN estimates that 90% of Afghan women and girls have experienced domestic violence.

More recently in Israel, the Associated Press, ran a story about Muslims in Gaza selling their daughters into the Islamic institution of sex slavery that they call marriage, describing the sale and rape of a 14-year-old girl with the assistance of her new husband’s family.

“Eventually, his mother ‘tied up my hands above my head,’ the daughter said. The husband then raped her. After that, he repeatedly threatened to bring his mother to tie her up if she screamed, she said. She recounted repeated instances of rape and said on one occasion, she had to be taken to the hospital with bleeding.”

The AP, which had known ties to Hamas, in a new low, illustrated this story with imaginary drawings of the supposed suffering in Gaza and blamed the situation on Israel, but child marriage increased early on after the Hamas takeover because it was considered more Islamic.

The AP blames Israel for the traditional Islamic sale of daughters in Gaza, featuring a quote claiming that “at times of widespread displacement in conflicts with Israel, some Palestinians have seen marriage as a way to bring stability for their daughters.” The AP queried the Supreme Sharia Court in Gaza which stated that “20.6% of the 35,474 marriages recorded in 2024 and 2025 involved a girl under 18, including 627 marriages of girls under 15.” That number was at 21% in 2017 when there was no significant conflict. And it’s always been higher in Gaza in part because there hasn’t been much in the way of a Christian population to balance out Islam.

The official statistics coming out of Hamas are likely fictional anyway. In the previous decade, nearly a quarter of girls in Gaza had a live birth before they had turned 18 years old. Since out-of-wedlock births result in honor killings, these would be births within marriages.
Much as Islamic child rape in Afghanistan was blamed on the U.S., the UN and the AP blame the sale of girls into sex slavery in Gaza on Israel. But, as in Afghanistan, if the sale of girls is supposedly happening due to the Oct 7 war, why did it also predate the war?And, if as the AP claims, this is the work of loving parents who just can’t provide for their families, why did the UN report in 2019 that 38% of women in Gaza surveyed described domestic abuse by their husbands? And why did it report that under Hamas, “the prevalence of violence against women by their husbands is significantly higher in the Gaza Strip than in the West Bank?” Is Israel making Muslim men in Gaza beat their wives at higher rates? --->READ MORE HERE

If you like what you see, please "Like" and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

RIGHT SPEAK

President Trump’s Crackdown On H1B Visa Abuse Sends Dallas Home Prices Way Down

Pope Leo Says Migrants Should Integrate And Obey The Law: Letting Everyone Into Your Country, Regardless of Their Culture or Willingness to Assimilate, is Not Christian Charity. It’s Chaos and Civilizational Collapse

What Pope Leo Said About Immigration

Why This Is a Welcome Shift

New Initiative Takes ‘Maximum Warfare’ To Dems’ Racist Congressional Districts: ‘This is not the time for half measures,’ said Marshall Yates, Director of the REPAIR Initiative Gearing Up to Challenge Race-Based Districts

‘Race-Based Discrimination’

‘Not the Time for Half Measures’ --->READ MORE HERE

Britain’s Censorship Regime Was Always Going To Get People Like Henry Nowak Killed: The U.K.’s Censorship Regime Indulges the Idea That People Who Hold Certain Beliefs Do Not Deserve to Live Freely — Or At All.

Down Syndrome Babies Like My Little Sister-In-Law Are Not Defects To Eliminate: The Tragedy is not Valentina’s Life with Down Syndrome; the Tragedy Would Have Been Never Letting Her Live It

Republicans Supported Gay Marriage ‘Rights’ Until They Saw It Destroy Children’s Rights: The Law Cannot Simultaneously Uphold Same-Sex Marriage and a Child’s Right to His Mother and Father

‘Parentage’

Undeniable Consequences --->READ MORE HERE

Why Doesn’t America Denaturalize In The Thousands Like It Used To? There Needs to be a Massive Denaturalization Effort to Rectify the Mistaken Awards of Citizenship Over the Past 60 Years

Unrest in Belfast: A Near-Beheading Brings British Rage to a Boil; Belfast Burning: And the Media Won't Say Why

Mamdani Distributes Chocolate Condoms to Fight Disease Outbreak: Monkeypox, Measles, Syphilis: the Sickest City Has Got It All

ICE Blasts ‘reckless’ Mamdani, Hochul as Agency IDs Criminal Illegal Migrants Picked Up in NY; 'NYC won't be another Minnesota': Homan Unveils Aggressive ICE Plan; Puts Hochul, Mamdani On Notice

India: Muslim Mob Attacks Police While Defying Directive Against Roadside Prayers: Islamic Supremacy and Violation of Infidel Laws; Violent Protest in Kolkata Against Demolition, Namaz Curbs, 20 Held, 3 cops Injured

Here Are The Biggest Outstanding Supreme Court Cases To Keep An Eye Out For

National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission

Trump v. Slaughter

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

Trump v. Cook

Wolford v. Lopez

U.S. v. Hemani

Watson v. Republican National Committee

ICYMI: Wild Coast Guard Photo Shows 240 Illegal Migrants Packed Onto Tiny, Sinking Boat; Overcrowded Migrant Vessel with 240 People On Board Intercepted Near Turks and Caicos

After the San Diego Attack, Hamas-Linked CAIR Looked Everywhere But at its Own Rhetoric: A Familiar Deceptive Script

A Verdict Before a Motive

The Context No One Mentioned

Questions the Coverage Never Asked

After Beheading Attempt In Ireland, New York Times Says The Real ‘Violence’ Is From Right-Wingers: The Outlet Called the Protestors in Belfast ‘far-right radicals,’ But Called BLM Protestors ‘peaceful protestors with “room for rage.”‘

The Big Lie of Blaming U.S., Israel for Islamic Child Rape in Gaza and Afghanistan: Muslim Men Selling Their Daughters into Sex Slavery Isn’t Our Fault, It’s Islam’s Fault