<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.wisbar.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Appellate Practice Section Blog | State Bar of Wisconsin</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/Pages/RSS.aspx</link><description></description><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Who Leaked the US Supreme Court’s Draft Opinion?</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=29156</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=29156</guid><dc:creator>Jacques C. Condon &amp; Nicholas C. Zales</dc:creator><description>When Politico published and reported on a leaked U.S. Supreme Court draft opinion on Roe v. Wade, firestorm of responses ensued. Two appellate practitioners, Jacques Condon and Nicholas Zales, discuss the leak and its implications.</description><pubDate>2022-06-09 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title> From Articles to an Upcoming CLE: Appellate Practice Continues a Step Ahead</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=29085</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=29085</guid><dc:creator>Eric G. Pearson</dc:creator><description>The State Bar of Wisconsin Appellate Practice Section is hosting a day-long CLE session on Appellate Practice in District I on May 19. Is it for you? Here are the details on this important appellate practice event.</description><pubDate>2022-05-04 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Justice on Wheels: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Visits Ozaukee County</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=28677</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=28677</guid><dc:creator>Jacques C. Condon</dc:creator><description>The Wisconsin Supreme Court recently visited Ozaukee County as part of its “Justice on Wheels” program. Jacques Condon writes about their visit and includes excerpt from the remarks of Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler.</description><pubDate>2021-10-27 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Arguing a Case at the Seventh Circuit via Zoom</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=28371</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=28371</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas C. Zales</dc:creator><description>What’s it like to argue a case before the Seventh Circuit – via Zoom? 
In October 2020, Milwaukee attorney Nick Zales did just that, and discusses just what it was like to embrace the appellate Zoom experience.
</description><pubDate>2021-05-04 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Appellate eFiling Petition Filed in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=28123</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=28123</guid><dc:creator>Eric G. Pearson</dc:creator><description>An appellate eFiling petition and rule amendments are now before the Wisconsin Supreme Court for approval. Eric Pearson outlines the petition and proposed changes, where to find more information about the petition, and where to file any comments.</description><pubDate>2020-12-21 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Meet the Brief-Writing Champions of Appellate Practice Section’s Best Brief Competition</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27858</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27858</guid><dc:creator>Jacques C. Condon</dc:creator><description>Meet the champions of the Appellate Practice Section’s third Best Briefs Competition. What did it take to find them? Jacques Condon talks about the winners and the competition.</description><pubDate>2020-07-21 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>A ‘Monumental’ Decision: U.S. Supreme Court and LGBTQ Discrimination</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27831</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27831</guid><dc:creator>Erin M. Strohbehn, Max T. Stephenson</dc:creator><description>The U.S. Supreme Court has now weighed in on sexual-orientation and gender-identity discrimination and protections in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Erin Strohbehn and Max T. Stephenson discuss the recent decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia.</description><pubDate>2020-07-07 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court, LGBTQ Discrimination, and Title VII Protections</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27421</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27421</guid><dc:creator>Erin M. Strohbehn, Max T. Stephenson</dc:creator><description>The U.S. Supreme Court may soon make a determination on whether sexual-orientation and gender-identity discrimination is a discrimination based on sex. Erin Strohbehn and Max T. Stephenson discuss the cases before the Court that address protections in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.</description><pubDate>2020-01-15 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Appellate Standards of Review: Finding Justice for Maximum Security (Part 6)</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27238</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27238</guid><dc:creator>Jacques C. Condon</dc:creator><description>In this six-part series, Jacques Condon takes a look at the concept and reality of standards of review in appeals. In this sixth and final part, he discusses the appellate review through the courts.</description><pubDate>2019-09-27 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Appellate Standards of Review: Maximizing an Appeal for Maximum Security (Part 5)</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27237</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=27237</guid><dc:creator>Jacques C. Condon</dc:creator><description>In this six-part series, Jacques Condon takes a look at the concept and reality of standards of review in appeals. In this fifth part, he contemplates how the intersections of different standards of review may come into play in the case involving the horse disqualified from a first-place finish at the 2019 Kentucky Derby. </description><pubDate>2019-09-27 00:00:00</pubDate></item></channel></rss>