<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.wisbar.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Family Law Blog | State Bar of Wisconsin</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/Pages/RSS.aspx</link><description></description><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Family Lawyer as Problem Solver</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=31450</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=31450</guid><dc:creator>Paul W. Stenzel</dc:creator><description>There is a significant number of family law parties who don't hire lawyers, writes Paul Stenzel. It wouldn't be difficult for family lawyers to attract these folks – and if we don't, AI might fill the void.</description><pubDate>2026-02-23 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Wisconsin's Balance Placement Standard Works without a Presumption of Equal Time </title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=31403</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=31403</guid><dc:creator>Brad C. Schweiger</dc:creator><description>Wisconsin's physical placement statute directs courts to maximize time with each parent while keeping the child's best interests at the center of every decision. Brad C. Schweiger explains why that flexible, individualized approach better serves families than a rigid presumption of equal placement.</description><pubDate>2026-01-14 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>The Case for Mental Health Training in Law School – A Proposal</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=31240</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=31240</guid><dc:creator>Angela R. Olson</dc:creator><description>Family lawyers often face their clients’ mental health crises and their own. Angela Olson proposes a practical solution: formal mental health training in law school.</description><pubDate>2025-09-29 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Waiting for All Issues to Resolve? You May Miss the Appeal Window</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30987</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30987</guid><dc:creator>Jolene D. Schneider</dc:creator><description>Attorneys need to know and follow rules of civil and appellate procedure to avoid compromising the rights of their clients. Jolene Schneider discusses lessons from Morway v. Morway on the importance of incorporating finality statements into post-judgment orders.</description><pubDate>2025-04-25 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Finding Fault: The History of Grounds for Divorce in Wisconsin</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30896</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30896</guid><dc:creator>Hon. Barry J. Boline</dc:creator><description>In Wisconsin, the requirement of finding fault in divorce has come and gone over the decades. Comm. Barry Boline discusses the history of divorce and finding fault in Wisconsin.</description><pubDate>2025-03-03 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Addressing Issues of Cellphones and Social Media Access in Custody and Placement</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30785</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30785</guid><dc:creator>Kristen E. Lonergan</dc:creator><description>Attorneys should consider updating their orders to equip parents to better address one of the biggest parenting decisions they will have to make: access to cell phones and social media, writes Kristen Lonergan.</description><pubDate>2024-12-18 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Revising Placement: The Harm Standard, Section 767.451, and the Two-year Limit</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30699</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30699</guid><dc:creator>Chelsie A. Thuecks</dc:creator><description>Practitioners often disagree on when the harm standard is required to revise custody and placement orders pursuant to Wis. Stat. section 767.451(1). Chelsie Thuecks argues that the harm standard only applies within two years of the initial order regarding custody and placement.</description><pubDate>2024-10-28 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Should You Respond to Bad Legal Advice on Social Media?</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30589</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30589</guid><dc:creator>Sarah B. Bondar</dc:creator><description>When attorneys encounter bad legal advice on social media, what should they do? Sarah Bondar says that sometimes being helpful can cause problems, and that the reward does not outweigh the risk.</description><pubDate>2024-08-08 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Equal But Not Separate: Joint Custody Means Both Parties Must Agree</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30448</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30448</guid><dc:creator>Karyn Gimbel Youso</dc:creator><description>Joint custody in Wisconsin has evolved. Karyn Gimbel Youso discusses the history of joint custody, including a recent unpublished case that she believes represents the correct application of current law.</description><pubDate>2024-05-31 00:00:00</pubDate></item><item><title>Property Division: Exceptions to the Double Counting Rule</title><link>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30412</link><guid>https://www.wisbar.org/NewsPublications/Pages/General-Article.aspx?ArticleID=30412</guid><dc:creator>David S. Kowalski</dc:creator><description>Double counting – dividing an asset for property and as income available for maintenance – is generally prohibited. A more nuanced review of the rule and case law reveals important exceptions, writes David Kowalski.</description><pubDate>2024-05-07 00:00:00</pubDate></item></channel></rss>