sanjeevmedia

Talal Akbar Bugti Vs Ali Saif (Abusing)..Live Class of Bugti, lol

2012-03-20T20:03:00.001+05:30

Batsman by bowler / pitch quality: The final grouping

2012-03-20T19:35:00.003+05:30

Batsman by bowler / pitch quality: The final grouping

Tests - Pitch type analysis: The final solution ???

2012-03-20T19:35:00.001+05:30

Tests - Pitch type analysis: The final solution ???

Pitch quality analysis across all Tests

2012-03-20T19:33:00.001+05:30

Pitch quality analysis across all Tests

Batsman analysis by bowler-pitch quality - part one

2012-03-20T19:31:00.001+05:30

Batsman analysis by bowler-pitch quality - part one

Batsman analysis by bowler-pitch quality - part 2

2012-03-20T19:30:00.001+05:30

Batsman analysis by bowler-pitch quality - part 2

Tests during 2011: an alternate look

2012-03-20T19:29:00.001+05:30

Tests during 2011: an alternate look

Dravid's Career in Stats

2012-03-20T19:28:00.000+05:30

« Batsman by bowler / pitch quality: The final grouping

March 19, 2012

Posted by Anantha Narayanan 1 day, 6 hours ago in

Dravid in Tests: not just a "Wall" but a monument

This is a study of the Test career of Dravid. He has achieved a lot in the ODI arena also. However there is simply no comparison. It is Dravid's Test achievements which we need to concentrate on since it is in that arena of cricket that India is going to miss Dravid the most.

1. A summary of Dravid's career

Matches: 164
Innings: 286
NOs:      32
Runs:  13288  
Avge:  52.31
100s:     36 (Freq: one every 7.9 inns)
 50s:     63
Balls Faced: 31259
Batting StRt: 42.5 
Catches:       209

Team-Shr: 164 13288  88942 14.9%

Team runs while Dravid was at crease : 32468
Dravid's % Runs contribution         : 40.93%

Team balls while Dravid was at crease     : 62721
% of balls faced by Dravid while at crease: 49.84%
Average balls per innings faced by Dravid : 109.3

Most of this information is known. A few additional bits of information. Dravid has scored a century in once every 8 innings. He has faced 31259 balls and has, as expected, a relatively low strike rate of 42.5.

While Dravid was at crease, a total of 62721 balls were faced by India. Dravid, thus faced, nearly half the balls received by India. While he was at crease, a total of 32468 runs were scored. As a testimony to his relatively slower scoring, he has scored just over 40% of the team runs while at crease.

2. Analysis of balls played

However the important number is the last one. Per innings, excluding none, Dravid faced an average of 109 balls. There are quite a few, Boycott, Bradman, Hammond, Hutton, Barrington, Hobbs, Sutcliffe et al who are ahead of Dravid. However no modern cricketer comes close to Dravid. The nearest is Glenn Turner of New Zealand. Dravid has faced over 25% of the completed innings team balls, in innings of 100-plus balls, 77 times, about 25% of his innings. The break-down of Dravid's innings is given below. Quite difficult to draw major inferences other than that, in about 45% of the innings, Dravid has crossed 100 balls.

200 balls and above: 48 (16.8%)
100-199 balls:       81 (28.3%)
 50 to 99 balls:     60 (21.0%)
  1 to 49 balls:     97 (33.8%)

3. Dravid's career graph

Career graph of Rahul Dravid
© Anantha Narayanan

Dravid's career is expressed above in graphical form. The first innings runs are shown above mid line and the second innings scores below. The lean 11-Test period around 2008 is clear as also the revival afterwards. Look at the last four lean tests, and the wonderful Tests before these.

4. A breakdown by innings

Description    T   I  N  Runs   Avge 100  50 Freq

Inns 1            75  3  4121  57.24  15  15  5.0
Inns 2            89  7  4984  60.78  15  24  5.9
Inns 3            65  4  2608  42.75   5  15 13.0
Inns 4            57 18  1575  40.38   1   9 57.0

This table splits Dravid's batting efforts by innings. As expected, the first innings numbers are far better, around an average of nearly 60. The second innings tapers off into around 40. Out of the 57 efforts in the last innings, there has been only one century. Three of Dravid's 70s have been in winning causes. The only century, and four fifties, have been scored in drawn matches. No great record, this. The third innings is something else. Led by the once-in-a-lifetime innings of 180, Dravid scored three centuries in won causes.

5. A breakdown by batting position

Description    T   I  N  Runs   Avge 100  50 Freq

Bat-Pos 1/2       23  4   897  47.21   4   1  5.8
Bat-Pos 3        219 20 10524  52.88  28  50  7.8
Bat-Pos 4         21  3   957  53.17   2   6 10.5
Bat-Pos 5         11  3   308  38.50   1   1 11.0
Bat-Pos 6          8  2   413  68.83   1   2  8.0
Bat-Pos 7          4  0   279  69.75   0   3  4.0

Avge Batting Position:  3.13

This is the most open secret. No.3 is Dravid's position. An average of 52.88 in this pivotal position. 28 of his hundreds have come in this position. No.3 has been covered in depth later.

6. Dravid's career graph: Home and Away

Home and away performances of Rahul Dravid
© Anantha Narayanan

The above graph splits Dravid's Tests between Home and Away. Note the stronger representation of the green lines indicating away Tests. Three of the four 200s have been scored away, these four having been scored during a purple period during 2002-04. He is one of the rare batsmen who has done better away (53.03) than home (51.36). This is a tribute to his technique and ability to adopt to varying conditions. The numbers for these three graphs are available later.

7. Dravid's career graph: Results

Dravid in wins, losses and draws
© Anantha Narayanan

The above is a graphic representation of the results. The three results are colour-coded while retaining the first and second innings separation. Note the profusion of the red lines over the last dozen Tests. However no doubting the purple patches earlier.

8. Dravid's career graph: Performance vs the other teams

Dravid versus opposition teams
© Anantha Narayanan

This is a graphical representation of Dravid's performance against the other 9 teams. Certainly what stands out is the fact that Dravid had a great time against England, New Zealand, Pakistan and West Indies. However he averages below 40 against Australia and South Africa. He is slightly below par against Sri Lanka.

The tables are available below. Note Dravid's high average when the team winds and loses and how low Dravid's average is when India loses.

Description    T   I  N  Runs   Avge 100  50 Freq TRuns   %

Home          70 120 11  5598  51.36  15  27  8.0 39326 14.2%
Away          94 166 21  7690  53.03  21  36  7.9 49616 15.5%

Won           56  92 14  5131  65.78  15  23  6.1 31238 16.4%
Drawn         59  96 13  5379  64.81  17  28  5.6 34798 15.5%
Lost          49  98  5  2778  29.87   4  12 24.5 22906 12.1%

Australia     33  62  6  2166  38.68   2  13 31.0
Bangladesh     7  10  2   560  70.00   3   1  3.3
England       21  37  5  1950  60.94   7   8  5.3
New Zealand   15  28  2  1659  63.81   6   6  4.7
Pakistan      15  26  3  1236  53.74   5   3  5.2
South Africa  21  40  3  1252  33.84   2   5 20.0
Sri Lanka     20  32  1  1508  48.65   3   9 10.7
West Indies   23  38  7  1978  63.81   5  13  7.6
Zimbabwe       9  13  3   979  97.90   3   5  4.3

9. Dravid at no.3: a special study

To have Dravid walking in at no.3, provided the adventurous openers with the license to attack, Tendulkar at no.4 to have the cushion of the impenetrable fortress ahead of him, the captain the luxury of one of the greatest batting line-ups ever, anchored around Dravid and the public, the comfort feeling that India would not go "nothing for 2" quickly. Now that we will never see Dravid walk in at no.3, it is necessary to study what Dravid faced at no.3 and what he achieved.

It has already been seen that Dravid played 219 innings at no.3, scored over 10000 runs and averaged 52.88. As top no.3 batsmen go Dravid is in the middle, with other no.3 greats like Bradman, Hammond, Richards, Sangakkara and Ponting ahead of him. That is to be expected. However that is not the point here. What positions did he come in. My first idea was to do an average of the scores. However I quickly realized that coming in at 0 for 1 and 100 for 1 was much worse than coming in at 40 for 1 and 60 for 1. So I listed the innings and derived some valuable information from that.

Dravid's no.3 summary:

No of times batted:  219
Came in at  0 for 1:  18 ( 8.2%).
Came in at  x for 1:  61 (27.8%).
Came in at 1x for 1: 106 (48.4%).
Came in 75 for 1:    172 (78.5%).

Digest the above for a minute. Dravid has walked in, within 10 minutes, nearly 10% of the time. He has got to the crease, within 30 minutes, around 28% of the times. He has got in to the crease, before the first drinks break, more than 100 times. And, to top it all, he probably has not the luxury of a peaceful lunch, on over 170 occasions. He would already have walked in to bat. This is probably unheard of in Test cricket, barring Lara in his later years.

10. Dravid's career analysed: by year

Description    T   I  N  Runs   Avge 100  50 Freq

1996           7  12  1   436  39.64   0   3 12.0
1997          12  18  2   984  61.50   1   9 18.0
1998           5   9  0   413  45.89   1   3  9.0
1999          10  19  1   865  48.06   4   1  4.8
2000           6  11  3   624  78.00   2   1  5.5
2001          13  23  3   935  46.75   1   6 23.0
2002          16  26  3  1357  59.00   5   5  5.2
2003           5  10  2   803 100.38   2   3  5.0
2004          12  18  3   946  63.07   2   4  9.0
2005           8  12  0   640  53.33   2   4  6.0
2006          12  22  4  1095  60.83   3   7  7.3
2007          10  19  2   606  35.65   1   3 19.0
2008          15  28  2   805  30.96   2   4 14.0
2009           6  10  1   747  83.00   2   5  5.0
2010          12  20  2   771  42.83   3   1  6.7
2011          12  23  3  1145  57.25   5   4  4.6
2012           3   6  0   116  19.33   0   0  6.0

This is an analysis by year. The best years have been 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2011. Note the serious dip in 2007/2008, followed by the revival in 2009. Then a dip in 2010 followed by the spurt in 2011.

In terms of 10-Test streaks, the best has been between Tests 70 and 79 during 2003-04 during which Dravid scored 1301 runs at an average of 86.73. The worst has been between Tests 121 and 130 during 2008 when Dravid scored 342 runs at an average of 19.00.

11. Dravid in the opening position

Dravid has opened, much against his own preferences, a few times and has done reasonably well. Probably the most significant of his opening stints was during the disastrous tour of England in 2011, when he opened a few times and got two hundreds. The 146 he made at Oval when he carried his bat through was sublime, when no one looked like getting a fifty. His other notable opening effort was at Lahore when he and Sehwag almost crossed Roy's and Mankad's opening effort of 413. There is no denying that this was the flattest pitch ever, but India were facing a huge total.

12. Dravid's significant partnerships.

I have given below 5 significant partnerships Dravid was part of. There may be misses since this has been done mainly from memory.

1. 376 between Laxman and Dravid at Calcutta against Australia. 
Almost certainly the best Indian partnership ever.
2. 303 between Dravid and Laxman at Adelaide. 
Equally important one but with the roles reversed.
3. 410 between Sehwag and Dravid at Lahore. 400-plus and facing a huge total. 
4. 170 between Dravid and Bangar at Headingley. The tough time in the Test. 
A match-winning partnership.
5. 268 between Sehwag and Dravid at Chennai against South Africa. 
Again facing a big total. 
Although Dravid and Tendulkar have added 6920 runs in 140-plus partnerships, 
I cannot immediately think of a great partnership. Readers could fill the gap.

13. Peer Comparisons

I have done three peer comparisons for Dravid. Two are with other international batsmen and one is with team-mates.

The first is Dravid's own batting average against the peer batting average of the 1-7 batsmen during the 704 Tests played during Dravid's career. No.7 is included since 7 is a key position in many a team and has been adorned by Gilchrist, Dhoni et al. Given below is the average comparison.

Dravid 286  13288  52.31     Peer-AT7  15452  578702  37.45    1.40

Dravid has outperformed his peer middle-order players by a huge proportion of 1.40. Just to get the perspective, Tendulkar is at 1.49, Kallis is at 1.42 and Ponting is at 1.43. Dravid's average dropped off after 2008.

The second is Dravid's own batting average against the peer batting average of the 1-7 batsmen who played for India in the 168 Tests played during Dravid's career. Given below is the average comparison.

Dravid 286  13288  52.31     Peer-IT7  1527  61323  40.16      1.30

This is as expected. With the strong Indian batting line-up, the ratio would be lower. Dravid has out-performed his team peers by 30%.

The third, and a very important one, is Dravid's no.3 position batting average against the peer batting average of the no.3 batsmen who played in the 704 Tests played during Dravid's career. Given below is the average comparison.

Dravid 219  10524  52.88     Peer-BP3  2120  87466  41.26      1.28

Dravid has outperformed his peer no.3 batsmen by a factor of 1.28. However it should be remembered that his no.3 average lags behind three batsmen, Lara, Ponting and Sangakkara.

To download/view the document containing Dravid's innings-by-innings career details, please click/right-click here.

To download/view the document containing all the tables shown above, please click/right-click here.

My favourite Dravid innings

These are my five favourite Dravid innings. I emphasize that these are my personal selections and readers may have their own.

1. 148 at Headingley. Even though India scored 600-plus, if Dravid had got out earlier, they would not have reached 250.
2. 180 at Calcutta. A little bit overshadowed by the 281, but the greatest supporting innings ever.
3. 270 at Rawalpindi won the away series in Pakistan.
4. 81 & 68 at Kingston in 2006 (when a fifty was at a premium).
5. 233 at Adelaide. Facing a 550-plus score and the score at 85 for 4, the Calcutta pair moved the world a few thousand kilometres down south, with their roles reversed.

If a writer wanted to do a tribute to Dravid, he could do that in an hour in wonderful prose. On the other hand I toil hard. Each of these graphs has taken me half a day because of data collection, formatting and colour selection. I now have a program to completely analyze a single player. But that program cannot do a cross-analysis. So if a reader feels that something new is needed, please ask. I cannot promise I would do it, but if I can, I will certainly do it.

Comments (61) Feedback

Batsman by bowler / pitch quality: The final grouping

2012-03-20T19:23:00.001+05:30

Batsman by bowler / pitch quality: The final grouping

Tests - Pitch type analysis: The final solution ???

2012-03-20T19:22:00.001+05:30

Tests - Pitch type analysis: The final solution ???

ODIs: a blue-print for the future

2012-03-20T19:21:00.001+05:30

ODIs: a blue-print for the future

Tests - Pitch type analysis: The final solution ???

2012-03-20T19:20:00.001+05:30

Tests - Pitch type analysis: The final solution ???

sanjeevmedia: Another Surprise in Store at SACA?

2012-01-20T02:49:00.000+05:30

sanjeevmedia: Another Surprise in Store at SACA?: The pictures above are not identical but have some relevance and can be co-related.Both the pictures are taken at the indoor center of So...

Another Surprise in Store at SACA?

2012-01-20T02:42:00.000+05:30

The pictures above are not identical but have some relevance and can be co-related.Both the pictures are taken at the indoor center of Southern Australia Cricket Association (SACA),Adelaide. And both are very historic ones. The left one is of Justice Hansen of Newzeland who was appointed as Judge to hear the infamous Bhajji-Symo case now known as 'Monkeygate'. In that press conference Justice Hansen took on the questions of restless media people who were working day-in day-out to get more and more stats of the scandal of the 2007-08 series.

At the same venue and from the same platform one of the all time greatest wicket keeper-batsmen Adam Gilchrist announced his retirement from Test Cricket.I am one of the witnesses of both these historic press conferences which happened at the same venue and during the same series.

Now the caravan of India-Australia cricket is once again in Adelaide after four years and this time around there is nothing sort of Monkeygate in the store. So, there is no need of Justice Hansen again. But we all know that this time Indian cricket is not troubled from outside forces but they are in trouble water created by themselves. Some of the stalwarts are living on the edge.The Indian cricket supporters are asking for their heads.There is no doubt about this that these greats are under tremendous pressure.So,are we again going to see any surprise in SACA. Is the famous Press Conference stage of SACA going to witness any historic announcement again? Well only time will tell but most likely the answer is no.There are two reasons for that. One,there is not any Australian cricketer biggie under any sort of pressure this time around and as far as our Stalwarts are concerned they are not Gilchrist and two,our biggies are larger than life and its not that easy to hang them just because they have not scored runs or taken wickets in a 'few' matches.

Of course Gilly was or is not a saint. But, he must be praised for what he did at that point of time.It can be recalled that Gilly had dropped a simple chance in the Adelaide test and he was upset on dropping one of the most simplest of catches. He thought that this is the time to hang his boots and clear the way for youngsters waiting in the wings.

I still vividly remember Gilly's family was present at that press conference and watched him say goodbye. Gilchrist choked up when thanking his wife and children for sticking by him. Would you believe that Gilly had come to his decision because he had dropped a simple catch of non other than VVS Laxman, who is in the most danger zone of his career at present. I still remember Laxman was on 37 and Gilly dropped a sitter off Brett Lee.The ball was outside the off stump and Laxman chased that one.A thick edge flew to Gilly on very comfortable height but he dropped it after taking it in his gloves. The crowd booed!! Gilly agonizingly looked up at the replay on the big screen of Adelaide Oval. Aussies or Gilly did not pay a huge price for that mistake. Laxman was out after adding 14 more runs in his tally and he was caught by Gilly off Lee.

Later on Gilchrist admitted in his goodbye press conference,"It made me realize in the ensuing 10 or 15 minutes that that's it".He added. "I'm not moving quite as well as I have, not just on the field but in training and my fitness. I just realized I didn't have the absolute desperation that you need to continue to maintain your standards."

Gilchrist's wicket-keeping had slipped during that series and he was unable to live-up to his own expectations, "I don't think anyone in this room has missed the fact that I did miss a few chances this series," he said. "It was bugging me and I couldn't understand why." When he announced his retirement he was playing his 96th test match. He could have easily asked for four more from the selectors to make it a century of test matches in his career. But, everything changed with the sound of a ball bouncing out from two gloves.Remember he was not asked by the Cricket Australia neither any selector had motivated him to take the toughest of decisions of his career. To add on to all these he was not 38 or 39. Not even 37 years old. He was simply 36. But he was wise.