<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/</link>
	<description>What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 23:25:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209325135</site>	<item>
		<title>TRACE Project Launches to Advance AI interoperability</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/07/trace-project-launches-to-advance-ai-interoperability/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/07/trace-project-launches-to-advance-ai-interoperability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd A Carpenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai as reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intellgence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence (AI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content provenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurt Book Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankfurter Buchmesse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ithaka S+R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STM]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The community comes together to launch TRACE, a project to improve generative AI systems' interoperability, verifiability and usage tracking.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/07/trace-project-launches-to-advance-ai-interoperability/">TRACE Project Launches to Advance AI interoperability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/07/trace-project-launches-to-advance-ai-interoperability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62982</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research Integrity in Scholarly Communications — SSP Pulse Check Report</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/06/research-integrity-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/06/research-integrity-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melanie Dolechek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 09:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society for Scholarly Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research integrity metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSP Pulse Check Survey Report]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we take a dive into the results of SSP's latest Pulse Check Survey, revealing how our community is grappling with research integrity and its interconnected challenges.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/06/research-integrity-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/">Research Integrity in Scholarly Communications — SSP Pulse Check Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/06/research-integrity-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62956</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Representation Is Not the Scholarship</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/05/the-representation-is-not-the-scholarship/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/05/the-representation-is-not-the-scholarship/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashutosh Ghildiyal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the map is not the territory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem with AI may not be that machines are growing more intelligent. It may be that we are becoming increasingly skilled at amplifying a highly capable, but limited form of cognition.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/05/the-representation-is-not-the-scholarship/">The Representation Is Not the Scholarship</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/05/the-representation-is-not-the-scholarship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62948</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Chefs: What Would You Have Done Differently About Open Access/Open Science if You Predicted the World as it Exists Today? Part 2</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/02/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today-part-2/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/02/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today-part-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Alison Mudditt, Steve Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask The Chefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budapest Open Access Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OA in hindsight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what we got right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what we got wrong]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let's continue our "Ask the Chefs" conversation about what they might do differently with their open access strategy if they knew then what they know now.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/02/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today-part-2/">Ask the Chefs: What Would You Have Done Differently About Open Access/Open Science if You Predicted the World as it Exists Today? Part 2</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/02/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62926</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Chefs: What Would You Have Done Differently About Open Access/Open Science if You Predicted the World as it Exists Today? Part 1</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/01/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/01/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Kaufman, Haseeb Irfanullah, Hong Zhou, Rick Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask The Chefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budapest Open Access Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OA in hindsight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what we got right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what we got wrong]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we "Ask the Chefs" to consider what they might do differently with their open access strategy if they knew then what they know now.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/01/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today/">Ask the Chefs: What Would You Have Done Differently About Open Access/Open Science if You Predicted the World as it Exists Today? Part 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/01/ask-the-chefs-what-would-you-have-done-differently-about-open-access-open-science-if-you-predicted-the-world-as-it-exists-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62910</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/30/guest-post-medical-and-health-data-sharing-policies-need-specific-guidance-new-stm-recommendations-aim-to-help/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/30/guest-post-medical-and-health-data-sharing-policies-need-specific-guidance-new-stm-recommendations-aim-to-help/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Cannon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human research participant policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical research data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research participant privacy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>STM has released voluntary recommendations to help journals and publishers clarify data sharing guidance for medical and health science researchers, where privacy, regulation, and ethics make generic policy language especially hard to apply. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/30/guest-post-medical-and-health-data-sharing-policies-need-specific-guidance-new-stm-recommendations-aim-to-help/">Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/30/guest-post-medical-and-health-data-sharing-policies-need-specific-guidance-new-stm-recommendations-aim-to-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62858</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Libraries Prepared for the Second Digital Transformation of Distinctive Collections?</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/29/are-libraries-prepared-second-digital-transformation-distinctive-collections/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/29/are-libraries-prepared-second-digital-transformation-distinctive-collections/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger C. Schonfeld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archivists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repositories]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Academic and research libraries, as well as public libraries, historical societies, and other organizations, hold extensive collections of rare and unique materials, such as archival and manuscript collections. These materials form an essential part of humanity’s cultural and historical record, and they are the vital source material for many humanistic fields. I believe that a second digital transformation is at hand for distinctive collections. How can library leaders establish a strategy for their distinctive collections that is fit for purpose today?  </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/29/are-libraries-prepared-second-digital-transformation-distinctive-collections/">Are Libraries Prepared for the Second Digital Transformation of Distinctive Collections?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/29/are-libraries-prepared-second-digital-transformation-distinctive-collections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62898</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mental Health Mondays: What We Haven’t Talked About</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/28/mental-health-mondays-what-we-havent-talked-about/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/28/mental-health-mondays-what-we-havent-talked-about/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scholarly Kitchen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health awareness Mondays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurodivergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide prevention]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's post shares a personal reflection on the importance of Suicide Prevention Month and how our community can best support colleagues who may need support.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/28/mental-health-mondays-what-we-havent-talked-about/">Mental Health Mondays: What We Haven’t Talked About</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/28/mental-health-mondays-what-we-havent-talked-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62880</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Integrity First: Inside Ukraine&#8217;s Publishing Reforms</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/25/guest-post-integrity-first-inside-ukraines-publishing-reforms/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/25/guest-post-integrity-first-inside-ukraines-publishing-reforms/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iryna Izarova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EASE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education and science in ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper mills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing in Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukrainian science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we feature an interview with Tetiana Yaroshenko, Deputy Director for Research and International Affairs at the State Scientific and Technical Library of Ukraine, and Denys Kurbatov, Deputy Minister of Education and Science of Ukraine.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/25/guest-post-integrity-first-inside-ukraines-publishing-reforms/">Guest Post — Integrity First: Inside Ukraine&#8217;s Publishing Reforms</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/25/guest-post-integrity-first-inside-ukraines-publishing-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62867</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Six Ways to Close the Attribution Loop in Publishing </title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/24/guest-post-six-ways-to-close-the-attribution-loop-in-publishing/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/24/guest-post-six-ways-to-close-the-attribution-loop-in-publishing/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitja Alexander Linss, Lou Peck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article submission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Data Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer relationship management systems (CRMs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submission increases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's guest bloggers present a 6-part model for explaining spikes in manuscript submissions and better informing future publishing strategies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/24/guest-post-six-ways-to-close-the-attribution-loop-in-publishing/">Guest Post — Six Ways to Close the Attribution Loop in Publishing </a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/24/guest-post-six-ways-to-close-the-attribution-loop-in-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Close-the-attribution-loop-V3.mp3" length="14979333" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62852</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/ai-and-scholarly-reading-foxes-versus-hedgehogs/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/ai-and-scholarly-reading-foxes-versus-hedgehogs/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai as reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI impact on subcriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI impact on web traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedgehogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading comprehension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the fox and the hedgehog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62841</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/ai-and-scholarly-reading-foxes-versus-hedgehogs/">AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/ai-and-scholarly-reading-foxes-versus-hedgehogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62841</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t: Multilingual Researchers’ Use of AI in Academic Writing</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/22/damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont-multilingual-researchers-use-of-ai-in-academic-writing/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/22/damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont-multilingual-researchers-use-of-ai-in-academic-writing/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avi Staiman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI translation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bias against AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English as a second language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistic discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multilingual auathors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Generative AI has made language tools ubiquitous, but it introduces risks of homogenized texts and semantic slippage. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/22/damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont-multilingual-researchers-use-of-ai-in-academic-writing/">Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t: Multilingual Researchers’ Use of AI in Academic Writing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/22/damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont-multilingual-researchers-use-of-ai-in-academic-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62825</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mental Health Awareness Mondays — Maternal Mental Health: It’s More than Postpartum Depression</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/21/mental-health-awareness-mondays-maternal-mental-health-its-more-than-postpartum-depression/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/21/mental-health-awareness-mondays-maternal-mental-health-its-more-than-postpartum-depression/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ja’Nya Jenoch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity equity inclusion and accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health awareness Mondays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postpardum syndrome]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In today’s Mental Health Monday post, Ja’Nya Jenoch, a licensed mental health counselor, professor, author, and health researcher, takes us through the history of maternal mental health, unpacks terms such as postpartum depression and maternal separation anxiety, and explores the complex systems and pressures that shape the experiences of many mothers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/21/mental-health-awareness-mondays-maternal-mental-health-its-more-than-postpartum-depression/">Mental Health Awareness Mondays — Maternal Mental Health: It’s More than Postpartum Depression</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/21/mental-health-awareness-mondays-maternal-mental-health-its-more-than-postpartum-depression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62816</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Does Peer Review Favor Familiarity Over Innovation?</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/18/guest-post-does-peer-review-favor-familiarity-over-innovation/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/18/guest-post-does-peer-review-favor-familiarity-over-innovation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sami Samiei Esfahany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acceptance criteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards of rigor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Closing out Peer Review Week 2026, today's post suggests that research novelty and capacity for innovation should be given greater priority than clarity and comprehensiveness in peer review.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/18/guest-post-does-peer-review-favor-familiarity-over-innovation/">Guest Post — Does Peer Review Favor Familiarity Over Innovation?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/18/guest-post-does-peer-review-favor-familiarity-over-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62795</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Mathïs Fédérico, Maria Machado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation criteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploratory research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifecycle of knowledge creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly rigor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validating research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What if the systems designed to protect scientific rigor are also making it harder for new ideas to emerge? Do different scholarly contributions deserve unique forms of evaluation?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/">Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62788</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
