<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/</link>
	<description>What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 12:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209325135</site>	<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Research Needs a Shared Standard for AI Disclosure</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/13/guest-post-research-needs-a-shared-standard-for-ai-disclosure/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/13/guest-post-research-needs-a-shared-standard-for-ai-disclosure/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kari D. Weaver, Bert Seghers, Kiera McNeice, Mike Perkins , Sergio Santamarina, Lorelie Lingard, Natalia Tsybuliak, Felix Dijstal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai and research integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's guest post presents outcomes of the WCRI's (World Conferences on Research Integrity) Focus Track to address this gap in clarity and standardization of AI disclosure.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/13/guest-post-research-needs-a-shared-standard-for-ai-disclosure/">Guest Post — Research Needs a Shared Standard for AI Disclosure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/13/guest-post-research-needs-a-shared-standard-for-ai-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62307</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The OMB Guidance Revision Threatens All Research</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/10/the-omb-guidance-revision-threatens-all-research/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/10/the-omb-guidance-revision-threatens-all-research/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karin Wulf, Sarah Weicksel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Historical Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMB rule changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US federal funding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The OMB proposed revision is about all research — and humanities research is just as vulnerable as STEM.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/10/the-omb-guidance-revision-threatens-all-research/">The OMB Guidance Revision Threatens All Research</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/10/the-omb-guidance-revision-threatens-all-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62261</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Why Research Libraries Oppose the OMB Revisions to the Uniform Guidance</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/09/guest-post-why-research-libraries-oppose-the-omb-revisions-to-the-uniform-guidance/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/09/guest-post-why-research-libraries-oppose-the-omb-revisions-to-the-uniform-guidance/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcel LaFlamme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 09:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Research Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMB rule changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research libraries (ARL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US federal research grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US OMB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's post explains how the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) is responding to the proposed rule changes for US federal grants.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/09/guest-post-why-research-libraries-oppose-the-omb-revisions-to-the-uniform-guidance/">Guest Post — Why Research Libraries Oppose the OMB Revisions to the Uniform Guidance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/09/guest-post-why-research-libraries-oppose-the-omb-revisions-to-the-uniform-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62235</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Where Do We Go From Here? How Scientific Societies are Thinking about the Proposed OMB Funding Rule</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/08/guest-post-where-do-we-go-from-here-how-scientific-societies-are-thinking-about-the-proposed-omb-funding-rule/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/08/guest-post-where-do-we-go-from-here-how-scientific-societies-are-thinking-about-the-proposed-omb-funding-rule/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica Miles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of managment and budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research associations and societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research fudning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US federal research grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US OMB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's post features conversations with society publishing leaders resisting the proposed OMB rule change for federal research funding.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/08/guest-post-where-do-we-go-from-here-how-scientific-societies-are-thinking-about-the-proposed-omb-funding-rule/">Guest Post — Where Do We Go From Here? How Scientific Societies are Thinking about the Proposed OMB Funding Rule</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/08/guest-post-where-do-we-go-from-here-how-scientific-societies-are-thinking-about-the-proposed-omb-funding-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62244</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Chefs: How Are You Responding to the OMB Proposed Rule Changes for US Research Funding?</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/07/ask-the-chefs-how-are-you-responding-to-the-omb-proposed-rule-changes-for-us-research-funding/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/07/ask-the-chefs-how-are-you-responding-to-the-omb-proposed-rule-changes-for-us-research-funding/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lettie Y. Conrad, Robert Harington, Haseeb Irfanullah, Roy Kaufman, Alice Meadows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of budget and management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal guidance for US federal grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US federal funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US OMB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we ask the Chefs how they (or their organizations) are responding to the proposed changes to how US federal research grant funds can be used.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/07/ask-the-chefs-how-are-you-responding-to-the-omb-proposed-rule-changes-for-us-research-funding/">Ask the Chefs: How Are You Responding to the OMB Proposed Rule Changes for US Research Funding?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/07/ask-the-chefs-how-are-you-responding-to-the-omb-proposed-rule-changes-for-us-research-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62217</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Emotional Rollercoaster of Scholarly Publishing</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/06/the-emotional-rollercoaster-of-scholarly-publishing/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/06/the-emotional-rollercoaster-of-scholarly-publishing/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haseeb Irfanullah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotion wheel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotional intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing experiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviewer experience]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we take an emotional journey through scholarly publishing and aim to understand how emotions impact authors', reviewers', and editors' experiences in the scholarly communications lifecycle.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/06/the-emotional-rollercoaster-of-scholarly-publishing/">The Emotional Rollercoaster of Scholarly Publishing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/06/the-emotional-rollercoaster-of-scholarly-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62199</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media in Scholarly Communications — SSP Pulse Check Report</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/02/social-media-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/02/social-media-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melanie Dolechek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 09:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society for Scholarly Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media in publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSP Pulse Check Survey Report]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SSP's latest Pulse Check survey offers a community-wide snapshot of social media in scholarly publishing as it stands today.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/02/social-media-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/">Social Media in Scholarly Communications — SSP Pulse Check Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/02/social-media-in-scholarly-communications-ssp-pulse-check-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62155</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Beyond the Prestige: Why Scientific Impact is More Than a Numbers Game</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/01/guest-post-beyond-the-prestige-why-scientific-impact-is-more-than-a-numbers-game/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/01/guest-post-beyond-the-prestige-why-scientific-impact-is-more-than-a-numbers-game/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yehonatan Banino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 09:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Experimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citation metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YCR index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yet another new metric]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's guest post introduces the YCR-index as an alternative to measuring value with raw citation counts.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/01/guest-post-beyond-the-prestige-why-scientific-impact-is-more-than-a-numbers-game/">Guest Post — Beyond the Prestige: Why Scientific Impact is More Than a Numbers Game</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/01/guest-post-beyond-the-prestige-why-scientific-impact-is-more-than-a-numbers-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62172</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Now is the Time for AI in Peer Review, and Publishing Policies Need to Recognize This</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/30/guest-post-now-is-the-time-for-ai-in-peer-review-and-publishing-policies-need-to-recognize-this/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/30/guest-post-now-is-the-time-for-ai-in-peer-review-and-publishing-policies-need-to-recognize-this/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elena Vicario]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai and research integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence (AI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence in peer review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's post asks us to acknowledge the role of AI in peer review and ensure practical guidance and policies that help scholars respond with consistency and confidence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/30/guest-post-now-is-the-time-for-ai-in-peer-review-and-publishing-policies-need-to-recognize-this/">Guest Post — Now is the Time for AI in Peer Review, and Publishing Policies Need to Recognize This</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/30/guest-post-now-is-the-time-for-ai-in-peer-review-and-publishing-policies-need-to-recognize-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62135</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before the Guardrails: Why AI Governance in Research Must Start with Purpose</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/29/before-the-guardrails-why-ai-governance-in-research-must-start-with-purpose/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/29/before-the-guardrails-why-ai-governance-in-research-must-start-with-purpose/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashutosh Ghildiyal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared governance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The future of scholarly communication will not be determined by how powerful AI becomes, but by whether the research community remains clear about the purpose those capabilities are meant to serve and whether it can govern them together.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/29/before-the-guardrails-why-ai-governance-in-research-must-start-with-purpose/">Before the Guardrails: Why AI Governance in Research Must Start with Purpose</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/29/before-the-guardrails-why-ai-governance-in-research-must-start-with-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62141</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Milestones that Matter: Celebrating a Wartime SSP Presidential Term</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/26/guest-post-milestones-that-matter-celebrating-a-wartime-ssp-presidential-term/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/26/guest-post-milestones-that-matter-celebrating-a-wartime-ssp-presidential-term/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebecca McLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society for Scholarly Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 SSP Annual Meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSP President]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we reprise the talk by outgoing SSP President Rebecca McLeod at last month's SSP Annual Meeting.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/26/guest-post-milestones-that-matter-celebrating-a-wartime-ssp-presidential-term/">Guest Post — Milestones that Matter: Celebrating a Wartime SSP Presidential Term</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/26/guest-post-milestones-that-matter-celebrating-a-wartime-ssp-presidential-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62111</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making AI Use of Scholarly Content Traceable, Measurable, and Trustworthy: A Meeting Report from Cambridge Scholarly AI Workshop</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/25/making-ai-use-of-scholarly-content-traceable-measurable-and-trustworthy-a-meeting-report-from-cambridge-scholarly-ai-workshop/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/25/making-ai-use-of-scholarly-content-traceable-measurable-and-trustworthy-a-meeting-report-from-cambridge-scholarly-ai-workshop/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd A Carpenter, Tasha Mellins-Cohen, Monica Westin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence (AI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meeting recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NISO Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrieval augmented generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workshop]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Cambridge workshop proposes new standard work to support provenance, attribution and metrics in scholarly communications AI tools.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/25/making-ai-use-of-scholarly-content-traceable-measurable-and-trustworthy-a-meeting-report-from-cambridge-scholarly-ai-workshop/">Making AI Use of Scholarly Content Traceable, Measurable, and Trustworthy: A Meeting Report from Cambridge Scholarly AI Workshop</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/25/making-ai-use-of-scholarly-content-traceable-measurable-and-trustworthy-a-meeting-report-from-cambridge-scholarly-ai-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62121</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frenemies: A Tale of Scholarly Publishing Marketing</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/24/frenemies-a-tale-of-scholarly-publishing-marketing/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/24/frenemies-a-tale-of-scholarly-publishing-marketing/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen, Michael Groth, MIchael Casp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society for Scholarly Publishing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's post reflects on how scholarly publishing professionals balance camaraderie with market competition, and how 3 "frenemies" navigate complex industry dynamics.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/24/frenemies-a-tale-of-scholarly-publishing-marketing/">Frenemies: A Tale of Scholarly Publishing Marketing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/24/frenemies-a-tale-of-scholarly-publishing-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62113</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Legitimate but Not Loved: What Academic Librarians Think About AI</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/23/guest-post-legitimate-but-not-loved-what-academic-librarians-think-about-ai/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/23/guest-post-legitimate-but-not-loved-what-academic-librarians-think-about-ai/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominique de Roo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>While it’s true that AI may be viewed as "legitimate," it’s far from universally loved. Understanding that distinction tells us something important about how the technology may ultimately be adopted — and governed — within academia.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/23/guest-post-legitimate-but-not-loved-what-academic-librarians-think-about-ai/">Guest Post — Legitimate but Not Loved: What Academic Librarians Think About AI</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/23/guest-post-legitimate-but-not-loved-what-academic-librarians-think-about-ai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62024</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Platform Comes Apart: Part 1</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/22/a-platform-comes-apart-part-1/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/22/a-platform-comes-apart-part-1/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hong Zhou, Adam Hyde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting platforms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's post explores what happens to the scholarly content platform when AI agents become the users.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/22/a-platform-comes-apart-part-1/">A Platform Comes Apart: Part 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/06/22/a-platform-comes-apart-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62116</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
