<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/</link>
	<description>What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209325135</site>	<item>
		<title>Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Mathïs Fédérico, Maria Machado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation criteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploratory research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifecycle of knowledge creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly rigor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validating research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What if the systems designed to protect scientific rigor are also making it harder for new ideas to emerge? Do different scholarly contributions deserve unique forms of evaluation?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/">Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/rethinking-scholarly-evaluation-matching-rigor-to-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62788</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/16/kitchen-essentials-an-interview-with-daniela-saderi-of-prereview/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/16/kitchen-essentials-an-interview-with-daniela-saderi-of-prereview/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alice Meadows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniela Saderi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitchen Essentials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review week 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PREreview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research infrastructure]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's Peer Review Week post is a Kitchen Essentials interview with Daniela Saderi, Executive Director of PREreview.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/16/kitchen-essentials-an-interview-with-daniela-saderi-of-prereview/">Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/16/kitchen-essentials-an-interview-with-daniela-saderi-of-prereview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62631</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — Peer Review Triage: Deciding What’s Worth Saving</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/15/guest-post-peer-review-triage-deciding-whats-worth-saving/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/15/guest-post-peer-review-triage-deciding-whats-worth-saving/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannah Heckner Swain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review week 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable peer review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's guest post asks what about our current peer review system is worth saving and if we're able to establish one that protects editorial judgment and preserves research integrity.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/15/guest-post-peer-review-triage-deciding-whats-worth-saving/">Guest Post — Peer Review Triage: Deciding What’s Worth Saving</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/15/guest-post-peer-review-triage-deciding-whats-worth-saving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62779</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/14/ask-the-chefs-peer-review-capacity-uncomfortable-truths-and-overlooked-conversations/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/14/ask-the-chefs-peer-review-capacity-uncomfortable-truths-and-overlooked-conversations/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Anderson, Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Hong Zhou, Todd A Carpenter, Haseeb Irfanullah, Alice Meadows, Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen, Roohi Ghosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review week 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRW 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviewer capacity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For Peer Review Week 2026, we asked the Chefs two questions: What is one uncomfortable truth about peer review that the scholarly publishing community doesn’t talk about enough? And, beyond recruiting more reviewers, what conversation about peer review capacity are we overlooking?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/14/ask-the-chefs-peer-review-capacity-uncomfortable-truths-and-overlooked-conversations/">Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/14/ask-the-chefs-peer-review-capacity-uncomfortable-truths-and-overlooked-conversations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62773</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — A Groupthink We Don&#8217;t Talk Much About</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/11/guest-post-a-groupthink-we-dont-talk-much-about/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/11/guest-post-a-groupthink-we-dont-talk-much-about/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Blair Christensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingroup dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ouroboros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researcher incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's guest post challenges our community to face tendencies toward groupthink and address the incentive structures that resist adaptation and innovation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/11/guest-post-a-groupthink-we-dont-talk-much-about/">Guest Post — A Groupthink We Don&#8217;t Talk Much About</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/11/guest-post-a-groupthink-we-dont-talk-much-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62763</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Chefs: AI and Copyright Licensing</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/10/ask-the-chefs-ai-and-copyright-licensing/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/10/ask-the-chefs-ai-and-copyright-licensing/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd A Carpenter, Roy Kaufman, Rick Anderson, Haseeb Irfanullah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US government]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The US Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the copyright infringement litigation between The New York Times and OpenAI and Microsoft, et. al., largely siding with the AI companies and strongly favoring the notion of LLM training as fair use. We asked the chefs for their thoughts.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/10/ask-the-chefs-ai-and-copyright-licensing/">Ask the Chefs: AI and Copyright Licensing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/10/ask-the-chefs-ai-and-copyright-licensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62745</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — The Unbundling of Scholarly Publishing: A Trilemma for the AI Era</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/09/guest-post-the-unbundling-of-scholarly-publishing-a-trilemma-for-the-ai-era/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/09/guest-post-the-unbundling-of-scholarly-publishing-a-trilemma-for-the-ai-era/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Kaube, Steve Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 09:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article of the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cassyni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content provenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[context]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elsevier leapspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PubPeer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taming the crocodile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling the journal article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiley gateway]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The journal portfolio, platform, or membership is no longer enough, as AI transforms how research is discovered and consumed. How will your organization adapt?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/09/guest-post-the-unbundling-of-scholarly-publishing-a-trilemma-for-the-ai-era/">Guest Post — The Unbundling of Scholarly Publishing: A Trilemma for the AI Era</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/09/guest-post-the-unbundling-of-scholarly-publishing-a-trilemma-for-the-ai-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62733</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up Close and Personal with the Trump Administration’s NIH Funding Cuts: An Interview with Sylvia Chou and Alexa Romberg</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alice Meadows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 09:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[27 UNIHTED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lysenkoism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institutes of Health (NIH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump administration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's interview with Sylvia Chou and Alexa Romberg, formerly of NIH, sheds some light on censorship at the agency and the damage it's doing to health research.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/">Up Close and Personal with the Trump Administration’s NIH Funding Cuts: An Interview with Sylvia Chou and Alexa Romberg</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/08/up-close-and-personal-with-the-trump-administrations-nih-funding-cuts-an-interview-with-sylvia-chou-and-alexa-romberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62685</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Directions Seminar: What Is a Journal in 2030?</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/04/new-directions-seminar-what-is-a-journal-in-2030/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/04/new-directions-seminar-what-is-a-journal-in-2030/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lettie Y. Conrad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society for Scholarly Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal of the future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDS 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Directions Seminar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we learn what's in store for this year's fall seminar from SSP.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/04/new-directions-seminar-what-is-a-journal-in-2030/">New Directions Seminar: What Is a Journal in 2030?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/04/new-directions-seminar-what-is-a-journal-in-2030/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62716</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post – A Year of Trends Beyond Scholarly Comms: What You Need to Know</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/03/guest-post-a-year-of-trends-beyond-scholarly-comms-what-you-need-to-know/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/03/guest-post-a-year-of-trends-beyond-scholarly-comms-what-you-need-to-know/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura Harvey, Chris Reid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 09:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[near missives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend watching]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's guest bloggers posit four important trends in scholarly communications that our community should be ready to tackle.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/03/guest-post-a-year-of-trends-beyond-scholarly-comms-what-you-need-to-know/">Guest Post – A Year of Trends Beyond Scholarly Comms: What You Need to Know</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/03/guest-post-a-year-of-trends-beyond-scholarly-comms-what-you-need-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62702</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Your AI Knows You Too Well: Personalization, Sycophancy, and the Risk of an Intellectual Echo Chamber in AI-assisted Research</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/02/when-your-ai-knows-you-too-well-personalization-sycophancy-and-the-risk-of-an-intellectual-echo-chamber-in-ai-assisted-research/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/02/when-your-ai-knows-you-too-well-personalization-sycophancy-and-the-risk-of-an-intellectual-echo-chamber-in-ai-assisted-research/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avi Staiman, Hong Zhou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 09:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[echo chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filter bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sycophancy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As AI research assistants learn our preferences, they may also become better at mirroring our assumptions. Avoiding that outcome will require more than a better prompt.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/02/when-your-ai-knows-you-too-well-personalization-sycophancy-and-the-risk-of-an-intellectual-echo-chamber-in-ai-assisted-research/">When Your AI Knows You Too Well: Personalization, Sycophancy, and the Risk of an Intellectual Echo Chamber in AI-assisted Research</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/02/when-your-ai-knows-you-too-well-personalization-sycophancy-and-the-risk-of-an-intellectual-echo-chamber-in-ai-assisted-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62687</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post — The Human Layer: Why AI Makes Academic Libraries More Essential, Not Less</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/01/guest-post-the-human-layer-why-ai-makes-academic-libraries-more-essential-not-less-2/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/01/guest-post-the-human-layer-why-ai-makes-academic-libraries-more-essential-not-less-2/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jane Jiang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authenticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning in the age of AI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The opportunity presented by AI is not to remove the human layer of scholarship. It is to recognize why that layer has always mattered.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/01/guest-post-the-human-layer-why-ai-makes-academic-libraries-more-essential-not-less-2/">Guest Post — The Human Layer: Why AI Makes Academic Libraries More Essential, Not Less</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/01/guest-post-the-human-layer-why-ai-makes-academic-libraries-more-essential-not-less-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62671</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Can Now Track AI-generated Content. It Doesn’t Solve the Real Problem.</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/31/we-can-now-track-ai-generated-content/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/31/we-can-now-track-ai-generated-content/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd A Carpenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrics and Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence (AI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence in peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU AI Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watermarking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Identifying AI content is now embedded in Claude models. It doesn't solve the problem we have. It also creates others.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/31/we-can-now-track-ai-generated-content/">We Can Now Track AI-generated Content. It Doesn’t Solve the Real Problem.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/31/we-can-now-track-ai-generated-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62619</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye Dolly</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/28/goodbye-dolly/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/28/goodbye-dolly/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty, Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, Lettie Y. Conrad, Angela Cochran, Dianndra Roberts, Roy Kaufman, Alice Meadows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dolly Parton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imagination Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in memoriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philanthropy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dolly Parton touched so many people's lives in so many ways. We reached out to the Chefs for their thoughts on her passing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/28/goodbye-dolly/">Goodbye Dolly</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/28/goodbye-dolly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62649</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI Use in The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/27/ai-use-in-the-scholarly-kitchen/</link>
					<comments>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/27/ai-use-in-the-scholarly-kitchen/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversial Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI generated images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI use by authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[average writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boring writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GenAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer reviewer bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Scholarly Kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSK policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word prediction machines]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/?p=62642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Some thoughts on the reader response the Scholarly Kitchen has seen regarding AI use by authors, a recent Nature News article on the efficacy of AI detection tools, and why it's important to keep experimenting to figure out what's ethically acceptable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/27/ai-use-in-the-scholarly-kitchen/">AI Use in The Scholarly Kitchen</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org">The Scholarly Kitchen</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/08/27/ai-use-in-the-scholarly-kitchen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62642</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
