<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp-atom.php">
	<title type="text">Scrubbles.net</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Visuals, Words, Sounds and Other Ephemeral Gleamings</subtitle>

	<updated>2010-09-06T02:10:38Z</updated>
	<generator uri="http://wordpress.org/" version="2.8">WordPress</generator>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net" />
	<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/feed/atom/</id>
	

			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Scrubbles" /><feedburner:info uri="scrubbles" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Mishmash: August 29 &#8211; September 4]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/VfTgCIVrfFU/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2309</id>
		<updated>2010-09-06T02:10:38Z</updated>
		<published>2010-09-06T02:01:38Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Roundup" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Vinyl" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="elvis presley" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="goldbergs" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Candyman (1992). After seeing Virginia Madsen not quite channeling Marion Davies, I wanted to check her out in something else, so this creepy hit went on the Netflix instant watching queue. Despite its age, it&#8217;s actually quite a scary and impressive film. It starts off with Philip Glass&#8217; foreboding score accompanying aerial shots of Chicago, [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/05/weekly-mishmash-august-29-september-4/"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103919/"><em>Candyman</em></a> (1992). After seeing Virginia Madsen not quite channeling Marion Davies, I wanted to check her out in something else, so this creepy hit went on the Netflix instant watching queue. Despite its age, it&#8217;s actually quite a scary and impressive film. It starts off with Philip Glass&#8217; foreboding score accompanying aerial shots of Chicago, leading one to believe we&#8217;re in for <em>Koyaanisqatsi 2: Revenge of the Hopi</em>. What follows is a fun and frantic opus based on the &#8220;Bloody Mary&#8221; legend that so taunted many a school child (who, me?). Madsen plays a college researcher whose study of urban legends leads her to investigate the legend of Candyman, a hook handed former slave allegedly still terrorizing the residents of a run-down apartment building unlucky enough to say his name into a mirror five times. Madsen makes for a strong, intelligent heroine and Tony Todd is a formidable slasher. It only gets cheesy near the end. Bar none, the best aspect of the film is the Philip Glass score. Apparently Glass believed he was working on an edgy indie, disowning his work once it was revealed as a mainstream scare flick. Strangely, the music is a good fit with the visuals; each one complements the others and makes the film as a whole much more effectively terrifying.<br />
<img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/sheet_goodbyelove.jpg" alt="sheet_goodbyelove" title="sheet_goodbyelove" width="200" height="251" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2311" /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0025194/"><em>Goodbye Love</em></a> (1933). Another venture into public domain land via the household <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000Q66IT0/inmyroom"><em>Comedy Kings 50 Movie Pack</em></a> set. This was a breezy yet inconsequential RKO quickie with Charlie Ruggles as a butler who&#8217;s in trouble for missing alimony payments. When he is sent off to a beach resort by his employer (Sidney Blackmer), he impersonates a rich big game hunter and snags a conniving gold digger (Verree Teasdale). The scheme gets more complicated when greedy Teasdale arranges to wed Ruggles. This was pretty dull stuff, considerably enlivened by the two leads. Ruggles knew how to play perplexed better than anyone and the swanky Teasdale is always worth a watch, even in tripe like this.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050560/"><em>Jeanne Eagels</em></a> (1957). Speaking of tripe — I&#8217;ve been wanting to see this biopic for several years now. It stars Kim Novak as Jeanne Eagels, brilliant and mercurial Broadway actress whose hard living ways led to an early demise in 1929. Unfortunately, this cliché-ridden mess was a disappointment on every level, from the pacing (which never recovers from interminable early scenes with Novak and Jeff Chandler at a seedy carnival) to the acting. Everything is overstated and unsubtle, and the role was well beyond what Novak&#8217;s talents could offer at the time. I believe the film&#8217;s biggest mistake was that it came about at the wrong time. Had it been made circa 1947 with Bette Davis, it may have been a campy, overheated melodrama &#8230; or perhaps it may have made for a compelling and gritty &#8217;70s drama with a Jane Fonda type playing Eagels. I award this one star out of five.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089424/"><em>Kiss of the Spider Woman</em></a> (1986). Another film I&#8217;ve been wanting to catch for years.<em> Kiss of the Spider Woman</em> stands as one of the early triumphs of indie filmmaking, anchored by a memorable turn by William Hurt as a gay prisoner coerced into wrangling secrets from cellmate Raoul Julia. This is certainly a well-acted and at times nicely mounted film. The importance of what it has to say never wavers, which might be why the film doesn&#8217;t quite hold up as well as other dramas of the era. While it has sound intentions to spare, generally it comes across like a pompous stage adaptation. The vague reasons for Hurt and Julia&#8217;s imprisonment are never adequately explained, the film-within-a-film segments with Sonia Braga as a shoulder-padded &#8217;40s heroine were painfully self-conscious, and the finale seemed too pat and formulaic. Even worse, the supposedly shocking kiss between the two leads arrived with a thud. Hurt deserves a lot of credit for breathing life into his swishy character, but I couldn&#8217;t help but feel his Oscar was another example of liberal Hollywood patting its own back. It&#8217;s an excellent performance, however, in a deeply flawed film.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0804505/"><em>Married Life</em></a> (2007). This was a good, meaty neo-Hitchcock domestic drama with Chris Cooper as an unhappily married man carrying on an affair with Rachel McAdams while trying to figure out a way to off his spouse, Patricia Clarkson. He confides his predicament to his best friend, Pierce Brosnan, all the while not realizing that Brosnan and McAdams are falling for each other. The film takes place in the late 1940s, with production design that is a feast for aficionados of that era. The look of the film is so nicely done, evocative of its time yet never overstated. The skilled Cooper and Clarkson are both reliably great; Brosnan and McAdams do well, too. The film has a few flaws (Brosnan&#8217;s narration chief among them), but on its own modest standards we both enjoyed this one a lot.<br />
Elvis Presley — <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002QVBP6O/inmyroom"><em>Elvis 75: Good Rockin&#8217; Tonight</em></a>. I&#8217;ve always been a casual fan of Elvis who lacked a decent, career-spanning collection of the man&#8217;s music. Since I had a lot of free credits at <a href="http://www.emusic.com/">eMusic</a> to spend, I decided to go for this comprehensive 100-track, four disc set released to celebrate his 75th birthday. Probably a two disc hits collection would have been okay for my needs, but I love the way this particular box was chosen with an even handed survey of 1955-77 music emphasizing quality over popularity (it even skips over a top ten hit, &#8220;The Wonder of You&#8221;). It opens with &#8220;My Happiness,&#8221; a charming 1953 recording made for his ma, then launches into eight tracks from the legendary Sun sessions. These raw early recordings reveal a man burning with talent and startlingly aware of every genre of the era (country, blues, nascent rock &#8216;n roll, even showtunes). The RCA stuff that followed is often criticized for being crass and shallow, but I dug those as well, both the hit and the buried treasures. For better or worse, he became a hip-swiveling icon almost immediately. Much of the late &#8217;50s material was chosen to make him look dangerous, yet appealing for a mainstream audience. It tends to verge on self-parody, frankly, but I think Elvis approached stuff like &#8220;I Want You, I Need You, I Love You&#8221; with tongue firmly planted in cheek and it&#8217;s a blast to hear it again. This set also picks through the gems of his oft-stinky Hollywood soundtracks with panache. Elvis&#8217; &#8216;68 comeback and its immediate aftermath form the highlights of the set, including my personal fave tune of his, 1970&#8217;s &#8220;Kentucky Rain.&#8221; The last quarter of the set basically covers his &#8217;70s output, which is the least familiar period often for good reason — he tended toward lazy, country-inflected live cuts at this time. Despite some good, overlooked performances, it is the least essential part of the box. The m.i.a. &#8220;Wonder Of You&#8221; epitomizes the schmaltzy, white jumpsuitted Elvis phase so well (perhaps I ought to download that, too), but at least the box ends on a more positive and lively note with the 2002 remix of &#8220;A Little Less Conversation.&#8221; RCA seems to churn out new Elvis repackagings like sausages, but at the very least this is one of the more thoughtful (and tasty) ones.</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YU2U3QAUGak?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YU2U3QAUGak?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
<p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1334479/"><em>Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg</em></a> (2009). Interesting, at times problematic doc on one of the 20th century&#8217;s most popular entertainers, now largely forgotten. <em>Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg</em> chronicles the life of Gertrude Berg, star and creator of the ethnic family sitcom <em>The Goldbergs</em>. Through ample clips and comments from colleagues and admirers, we gather that Berg was a true self-made media mogul. Berg&#8217;s creation Molly Goldberg was presented as the ultimate worldly wise, wry urban Jewish matriarch, a character that warmed the hearts of many Americans who otherwise wouldn&#8217;t know such a person. The fact that Berg was a savvy businesswoman whose private life differed greatly from the picture perfect family she wrote of is also amply discussed, although the filmmakers have an excessively fawning attitude toward their subject for it to have much impact. Between all the hyperbole and exaggeration (about her being a sitcom pioneer, etc.), Berg comes across as quite a lively and absorbing personality. I enjoyed learning a lot about her and her show. <em>The Goldbergs</em> became a blockbuster on the radio, but most of the exposure in this doc comes via clips from the TV incarnation which ran from 1949 to 1954. The series actually looks kind of stodgy and stagebound, which might explain why it&#8217;s never had the longevity of an <em>I Love Lucy</em>. I also liked the section on the blacklisting and eventual death of Berg&#8217;s onscreen husband, actor Philip Loeb. Beware, however: <em>Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg</em> suffers from an overabundance of out of context clips and too much obsequiousness. To which I say &#8220;oy vey.&#8221;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/05/weekly-mishmash-august-29-september-4/#comments" thr:count="1" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/05/weekly-mishmash-august-29-september-4/feed/atom/" thr:count="1" />
		<thr:total>1</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/05/weekly-mishmash-august-29-september-4/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forsaking All Others]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/BBSmyF__mOg/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2307</id>
		<updated>2010-09-02T01:29:02Z</updated>
		<published>2010-09-02T01:29:02Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Rubylith" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Video" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="doris day" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="motion graphics" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Over the weekend, the spouse and I caught Married Life starring Chris Cooper, Pierce Brosnan and the wonderful Patricia Clarkson. While we both enjoyed this neo-Hitchcock period drama very much, I loved the opening credits sequence. This was created by the Venice, California based Prologue studio. Loverly:


]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/01/forsaking-all-others/"><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, the spouse and I caught <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0804505/"><em>Married Life</em></a> starring Chris Cooper, Pierce Brosnan and the wonderful Patricia Clarkson. While we both enjoyed this neo-Hitchcock period drama very much, I <em>loved</em> the opening credits sequence. This was created by the Venice, California based <a href="http://www.prologue.com/">Prologue</a> studio. Loverly:</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cW8w_wdSxno?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cW8w_wdSxno?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="306"></embed></object></div>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/01/forsaking-all-others/#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/01/forsaking-all-others/feed/atom/" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/09/01/forsaking-all-others/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Mishmash: August 22-28]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/aRgzB6M35Pc/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2296</id>
		<updated>2010-08-30T01:11:53Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-30T01:00:35Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Roundup" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Vinyl" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="celine dion" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="john wayne" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Clash of the Titans (2010) and Repo Men (2010). Two DVD rentals that my spouse picked. As you can see, my spouse likes the special effects flicks. I like &#8216;em, too, as long as the special effects are supported by a good story and decent enough performances — two things that Clash of the Titans [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/29/weekly-mishmash-august-22-28/"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dvd_clashofthetitans.jpg" alt="dvd_clashofthetitans" title="dvd_clashofthetitans" width="210" height="270" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2298" /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0800320/"><em>Clash of the Titans</em></a> (2010) and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1053424/"><em>Repo Men</em></a> (2010). Two DVD rentals that my spouse picked. As you can see, my spouse likes the special effects flicks. I like &#8216;em, too, as long as the special effects are supported by a good story and decent enough performances — two things that <em>Clash of the Titans</em> and <em>Repo Men</em> sadly lack. <em>Repo Men</em> is the more promising of the two, with Jude Law laying on the charm as a near-future bounty hunter type whose job entitles him to reclaim artificial organs from people who are unable to pay for them. This film plays on the current health care and financial crises in the same way the far superior <em>Children of Men</em> envisioned a future where George W. Bush-era foreign policy ran amok. On the plus side, the movie benefits from good work from Law, Forest Whitaker and Liev Schreiber. As the film played on, however, it devolves into <em>Matrix</em>-esque chases and fights, ultimately becoming an icky and pointless exercise. The <em>Clash of the Titans</em> remake doesn&#8217;t aspire to such bold statements, which can be a great thing if handled the right way. I remember going to see the 1981 original with a bunch of Junior High pals at the local mall-plex and having a blast. With whiz-bang CGI and action scenes galore, the remake appeals to the same popcorn mindset but I found this one strangely hollow and uninviting. Sam Worthington is a bland lead and his military buzzcut distracts to no end, the effects are overwhelming (and in 3D, no less), and the film&#8217;s many fight scenes seem to never end. Oh, and it gets worse: the brief appearance of 1981&#8217;s mechanical owl is probably the lamest celluloid sop to nostalgia since they brought back the original spaceship design in 1998&#8217;s <em>Lost In Space</em> (only to blow it up seconds later).<br />
Celine Dion — <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000029DQ/inmyroom"><em>The Colour of My Love</em></a>. Found this for 50 cents in the markdown bin at the local Half Price Books store and it seemed to whisper &#8220;buy me&#8221; in a vaguely Franco-Canadian accent. The disc was actually well worth the two quarters it cost. On the whole, this 1993 effort is more diverse and likable than Dion&#8217;s self-titled 1991 album and not quite as dated/goofy as her English language debut, <em>Unison</em>. Lush ballads predominate, as epitomized by megahit &#8220;The Power Of Love,&#8221; but I found myself drawn to the lesser known tracks. The fluffy Tara Kemp-ish workout <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFtg4Dx1a30">&#8220;Misled&#8221;</a> hit the dance charts and even the top 40, odd considering I don&#8217;t remember it at all. Another beat-heavy track, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mMBSOnSmvY">&#8220;Refuse To Dance,&#8221;</a> is notable for having Dion&#8217;s voice effectively blended in with the instrumentation, creating a moody and disarmingly experimental sojourn in the album&#8217;s second half. I also downloaded this album&#8217;s non-U.S. &#8220;Just Walk Away,&#8221; a florid Latin style ballad which fits squarely in Eurovision Song Contest territory. Most of these tracks have the same personnel she always works with. The prolific Diane Warren contributed two of the better tracks, both sweet if overlong, overproduced and vamped up like crazy. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py1NO3xVzk0">&#8220;Next Plane Out&#8221;</a> is a typical big ballad, but the one I really dig is the Motownish <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZtvusnFMpU">&#8220;No Living Without You.&#8221;</a> Perhaps I love it so for its similarity to another cheeseball neo-soul record from that period, Charles &#038; Eddie&#8217;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GTzJZUu2U">&#8220;Would I Lie To You.&#8221;</a> Hmmm, wonder if I could find a used Charles &#038; Eddie CD at Half Price Books?<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091125/"><em>God&#8217;s Country</em></a> (1986). Charming, thought provoking documentary on the American heartland by French director Louis Malle. It&#8217;s 1979 and Malle focuses his camera on the diverse residents of Glencoe, Minnesota, following farm families, law enforcement, bank employees and jus&#8217; folk as they ramble about their lives and hopes for the future. In the most poignant scenes, he visits a nursing home and impartially films residents sitting glassy eyed in a room while a TV blares away. Things then turn celebratory as the film chronicles a tacky wedding ceremony in which the bride, groom and wedding party go bar hopping along the town&#8217;s main thoroughfare. In a bittersweet coda, Malle revisits the town in 1985 as residents come to grips with the disappearing ways of life caused by Reaganomics. This was completely fascinating in a personal way, having reminded this viewer of the times my family took trips to visit relatives in Nebraska. Malle not only knows how to allow his subjects to open up to the camera, he also trains his lens on interesting/quirky details such as an elaborately coiffed woman working at a slaughterhouse. In one scene, he visits a drugstore as the manager proudly shows off his establishment&#8217;s &#8220;Gay Nineties&#8221; decor theme. The place was a total trip, but it also had a personal resonance since my late grandfather once managed a very similar drugstore in a small midwestern town. It made me nostalgic, then somewhat sad as the realization hits that these places have been replaced by Wal-Marts (just as the quiet family farm has been largely co-opted by Monsanto). Sobering and well worth a look.<br />
<img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/poster_merrywidow.jpg" alt="poster_merrywidow" title="poster_merrywidow" width="280" height="217" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2299" /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0016104/"><em>The Merry Widow</em></a> (1925). Erich von Stroheim&#8217;s lush, long epic got a rare broadcast on Turner Classic Movies&#8217; recent day long salute to John Gilbert. Although there were many Gilbert films from that day that piqued my interest, I ended up with this because I&#8217;ve always been curious about his Gilbert&#8217;s co-star, Mae Murray, and the extravagance of von Stroheim productions are always worth a look. Gilbert plays the prince of a mythical, quasi-European kingdom who is smitten with visiting dancer named Sally O&#8217;Hara (Murray). Though the two are in love, his family forbids him to marry a commoner. Extenuating circumstances caused by the prince&#8217;s weaselly cousin (Roy D&#8217;Arcy) force Sally to end up wedding a creepy old guy with a foot fetish (!) instead. The man drops dead on the wedding night and she becomes&#8230; <em>The Merry Widow</em>. This was a suitably overstuffed affair that seemed pretty typical of 1920s cinema — it&#8217;s overlong and the acting was too affected (especially from Murray). Despite weird touches like foot fetish man and a couple of blindfolded musicians, the story was too trite to carry such an overstuffed production. As far as von Stroheim epics go, I much prefer <em>Greed</em> but this one has a few things going for it. Gilbert is rather staid and bland, but Murray&#8217;s showiness as a performer is a hoot. When she laughs, it&#8217;s a lusty toss back of the head and convulsive body shakes. When she cries, she transforms herself into a life-sized wet hankie with puppy dog eyes. It&#8217;s method acting squared for our Mae.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053221/"><em>Rio Bravo</em></a> (1959). While I normally wouldn&#8217;t be attracted to a late period Western starring John Wayne, this particular one directed by Howard Hawks has such a great critical reputation that I had to check it out. It didn&#8217;t disappoint. Wayne plays the sheriff of a small Texan town who is keeping criminal Claude Akins in lockup. Akins&#8217; brother and a bunch of other meanies are terrorizing the town trying to free the man, so Wayne enlists the help of a drunk but talented gunfighter (Dean Martin), an old coot (Walter Brennan) and a cocky teen (Ricky Nelson). This was conceived as Hawks&#8217; answer to <em>High Noon</em> — but instead of wimpy Gary Cooper grovelling for help from the townspeople, here we have four flawed yet commanding men taking on a challenge in an adult, responsible way. Like many Hawks films, there&#8217;s also a strong female presence with Angie Dickinson as a traveling performer who has her eye on the Duke. Dickinson seems a bit modern for the part, but she&#8217;s alluring as all get out. Martin&#8217;s nuanced performance was a big surprise, and I enjoyed his odd duet with Nelson. The film is long, but made in such a casual, appealing way that one doesn&#8217;t notice it. I actually think it&#8217;s perfectly paced, building up to the exciting climactic gunfight.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0369053/"><em>Separate Lies</em></a> (2005). IFC Channel recording. This was an intriguing but strangely unsatisfying domestic drama, written and directed by Julian Fellowes. The film concerns a well-heeled contemporary British couple played by Emily Watson and Tom Wilkinson. An accident in their plush neighborhood kills their housekeeper&#8217;s husband, which triggers the unraveling of the marriage when suspicion falls on Watson and her secret lover (Rupert Everett, looking weirdly gaunt). The first thing I noticed about this film is the wonderful acting, which is top-notch. I also enjoyed the precise, photogenic interiors, whether it&#8217;s a country estate or Wilkinson&#8217;s slick office. The story is serviceable enough at first, then it delves heavily into the leads&#8217; shifting feelings towards each other until it becomes an implausible morass. Fellowes took on a similar tact for his Oscar winning <em>Gosford Park</em> screenplay, using a mystery as a springboard to explore the complex relationships of its characters. That film worked brilliantly, but for some reason this one doesn&#8217;t jell and it winds up a well-intentioned, beautifully acted but inert film.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/29/weekly-mishmash-august-22-28/#comments" thr:count="2" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/29/weekly-mishmash-august-22-28/feed/atom/" thr:count="2" />
		<thr:total>2</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/29/weekly-mishmash-august-22-28/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[You&#8217;re Turning Violet, Violet!]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/LZx4V-9tK10/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2292</id>
		<updated>2010-08-27T01:01:54Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-27T01:01:54Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Site" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="scrubbles" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Doing some tweaking on the site design and decided to go all purple and violet with the color scheme. We also have a cleaner, sharper version of the header graphic. These colors come from the &#8220;eggplant&#8221; section of Adobe Illustrator&#8217;s vegetable color palette; I plan to keep it this way for a year before switching [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/26/youre-turning-violet-violet/"><![CDATA[<p>Doing some tweaking on the site design and decided to go all purple and violet with the color scheme. We also have a cleaner, sharper version of the header graphic. These colors come from the &#8220;eggplant&#8221; section of Adobe Illustrator&#8217;s vegetable color palette; I plan to keep it this way for a year before switching the colors out again.</p>
<p>Another thing I have to look into eventually is finding a wider Wordpress template. Having 500 pixels width for weblog entries used to be a great luxury, but now my weblog is starting to feel like Kate Moss in a world full of Kirstie Alleys. Skinny! Ideally I&#8217;d like to keep the current design, just rejigger the content area to add an extra 25% of girth. Having no talent for rejiggering things, however, this could be an insurmountable challenge.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/26/youre-turning-violet-violet/#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/26/youre-turning-violet-violet/feed/atom/" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/26/youre-turning-violet-violet/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Kodak Moment]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/U4NWlUX769o/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2290</id>
		<updated>2010-08-25T17:13:18Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-25T17:13:18Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Video" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="1920s" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="mae murray" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[This video has been passed around a lot, but I love Kodak&#8217;s precious test color footage from 1922 so much I want to share it here. It&#8217;s mesmerizing: the flicker, the color, the mannered posing. The weird looking woman in the clip&#8217;s last half is actress Mae Murray, one of the iconic silent film stars [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/25/kodak-moment/"><![CDATA[<p>This video has been passed around <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/08/24/kodak-1922-kodachrom.html">a lot</a>, but I love Kodak&#8217;s precious test color footage from 1922 so much I want to share it here. It&#8217;s mesmerizing: the flicker, the color, the mannered posing. The weird looking woman in the clip&#8217;s last half is actress <a href="http://silentladies.com/PMurray.html">Mae Murray</a>, one of the iconic silent film stars (her 1925 opus <em>The Merry Widow</em> just got DVR&#8217;d here at Chez Scrubbles). More info on the clip can be perused at Kodak&#8217;s <a href="http://1000words.kodak.com/post/?ID=2982503">A Thousand Words</a> weblog. Now excuse me while I watch it again:</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/J_RTnd3Smy8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/J_RTnd3Smy8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="306"></embed></object></div>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/25/kodak-moment/#comments" thr:count="2" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/25/kodak-moment/feed/atom/" thr:count="2" />
		<thr:total>2</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/25/kodak-moment/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Mishmash: August 15-21]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/R6bk0DkuaHQ/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2283</id>
		<updated>2010-08-23T02:27:19Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-23T02:15:17Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Roundup" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="jack carson" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="norma shearer" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Seven flicks in seven days — the dog days of summer are upon us.
Bigger, Faster, Stronger (2008). Interesting documentary told in a Morgan Spurlock-like fashion, about the lure of steroids in sports and entertainment. Filmmaker Chris Bell starts it off as a fairly straightforward autobiographical tale of how his childhood obsession with Hulk Hogan, Arnold [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/22/weekly-mishmash-august-15-21/"><![CDATA[<p>Seven flicks in seven days — the dog days of summer are upon us.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1151309/"><em>Bigger, Faster, Stronger</em></a> (2008). Interesting documentary told in a Morgan Spurlock-like fashion, about the lure of steroids in sports and entertainment. Filmmaker Chris Bell starts it off as a fairly straightforward autobiographical tale of how his childhood obsession with Hulk Hogan, Arnold Schwarzenegger and other bulked-up action stars affected him and his two equally brawny brothers. The siblings have a healthy competitive spirit in their teen years, but as they enter adulthood the constant need to be &#8220;bigger, faster, stronger&#8221; and the hollow pursuit of the fame that goes with it leads them off into different paths. Using a healthy dose of film and TV footage and animated graphics, Bell examines the steroid debate in a funny, even-handed way. Although I don&#8217;t agree with the film&#8217;s stance that the threat of steroids and other performance enhancers are overblown, it&#8217;s Bell&#8217;s ambivalence toward the subject and the dynamic he shares with his family that really shines through. The film&#8217;s greater subject is that success in America is an illusion, a point that comes through glaringly when George W. Bush is shown giving one of his hackneyed &#8220;anyone can make it&#8221; speeches while file footage of his dad plays. Overall, the film is perhaps a bit sprawling and overlong, but very thought provoking and worth a look.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1278340/"><em>Dead Snow</em></a> (2009). Another &#8220;Norwegian students trapped in the wilderness with a group of undead Nazis&#8221; movie. Christopher rented this after hearing Michael Moore recommend it on NPR. Although Moore praised it for being a top notch scarefest, the film is more of a comedy with horror elements a la <em>Shaun of the Dead</em> or the <em>Scream</em> movies. It follows a group of med students who are borrowing a friend&#8217;s cabin to have a snowy getaway, only to find that mysterious beings are hounding them at night. Eventually it&#8217;s discovered that the area was once a Nazi hideout with undead officers still patrolling the area looking for fresh human flesh to munch on. It <em>is</em> ludicrous, with characters doing all sorts of stupid things, but the cast was very appealing (I was sorry to see many of them offed so early) and the undead creatures are suitably frightening. Fair warning: towards the end, the film gets <em>very</em> bloody and gross. We wouldn&#8217;t have it any other way.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0020827/"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/poster_divorcee.jpg" alt="poster_divorcee" title="poster_divorcee" width="192" height="300" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2284" /></a><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0020827/"><em>The Divorcee</em></a> (1930). God help me, I&#8217;ve always like Norma Shearer. Despite the lady&#8217;s crossed eyes and fluttery demeanor, there&#8217;s something about her that keeps me coming back for more. I&#8217;ve surprisingly never seen Shearer in her Academy Award winning pre-Code melodrama <em>The Divorcee</em>. When it popped up on the TCM&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tcm.com/2010/suts/index.jsp">Summer Under the Stars</a> schedule as part of an all Shearer day, I decided to finally see if her performance holds up. In short, it does. Shearer seems to relish playing a free-spirited &#8220;modern&#8221; woman who marries beau Chester Morris, only to find that when it comes to marital infidelity the old fashioned double standard still holds true. Although the settings are dated, that central theme actually keeps the film from becoming a relic of the times. Opening with a wild party, the film is unusually brisk for an early talkie. Shearer gets good support from Morris and Robert Montgomery (although Conrad Nagel as Norma&#8217;s ex-flame is a bit dull). Shearer from this period still seems somewhat flighty to me (I prefer the <em>Marie Antoinette/The Women</em> era), but her big tell-off speech to Morris is still lively and potent as ever. The fashions and various pre-Code techniques are a lot of fun, too.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089260/"><em>The Hearst and Davies Affair</em></a> (1985). Always on the lookout for intriguing stuff to watch on the basic satellite schedule, I stuck this mid-&#8217;80s made for TV biopic on the DVR when it bizarrely showed up on the Reelz channel schedule. I mean, what&#8217;s the appeal to Joe Channel Surfer of Robert Mitchum and Viginia Madsen playing William Randolph Hearst and Marion Davies? This film was long, badly acted and directed in an unexceptional TV style, but it kept me intrigued if only for the film&#8217;s lush and historically accurate period details (parts were even filmed in Hearst Castle). The biggest problem with this film is that it covers too much territory in too short a time, going from when the pair first meet circa 1912 all the way through Hearst&#8217;s bankruptcy in the late &#8217;30s. Mitchum was decent enough, more he-man than the actual Hearst. There are shots when Madsen looks eerily similar to the young Marion Davies, despite the actress lacking the earthiness of the real Davies. She&#8217;s also too thin and pretty for the film&#8217;s later scenes, looking more like a Jean Harlow clone at a time when Davies was getting plump and matronly from heavy drinking. I&#8217;m nitpicking too much, but the film was diverting in an undemanding &#8220;retro <em>Dynasty</em>&#8221; sorta way.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070735/"><em>The Sting</em></a> (1973). Another effort in catching up with unseen Best Pictures of the past,<em> The Sting</em> nabbed the big prize in a year when the superior <em>Exorcist</em> and <em>American Graffiti</em> were also up for grabs. This was a well-made genre picture with Paul Newman and Robert Redford at their charismatic best as a pair of sophisticated grifters who undergo an insanely detailed plan to bilk a millionaire. Very enjoyable, even if the direction seemed a bit pat and the film&#8217;s flat lighting gives it an unfortunate TV movie look. The production design is pretty cool, with snazzy costuming and just about every shade of brown effectively conveying a Depression-era Chicago. I also thought the casting was excellent with some nifty work from Robert Shaw, Harold Gould, Ray Walston and Eileen Brennan. As fun as it was, it&#8217;s not a film that I&#8217;d eagerly revisit any time soon. It&#8217;s no <em>Exorcist</em> or <em>American Graffiti</em>, that&#8217;s for sure.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051055/"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/poster_tarnishedangels.jpg" alt="poster_tarnishedangels" title="poster_tarnishedangels" width="220" height="314" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2285" /></a><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051055/"><em>The Tarnished Angels</em></a> (1957). Tawdry but fascinating Douglas Sirk melodrama which re-teams the main actors from the better-known (but not as enjoyable) <em>Written on the Wind</em>. Based on a William Faulkner story, this film tracks a trio of Depression era barnstorming pilots. Manly Robert Stack and Dorothy Malone are unhappily married, with a child that Malone may or may not have had with their haggard mechanic (Jack Carson). Things get stirred up when Malone falls for roving reporter Rock Hudson. Since I found <em>Written on the Wind</em> the campiest and dumbest of Sirk&#8217;s movies, I arrived at this one with trepidation. This one also has camp to spare, but at least the setting and story are more involving and there are some good-to-decent performances amongst the hokum. Sirk adds a lot of his unique touches to this film, including his usual mirror images and having extras appear wearing odd, creepy masks. Touches like that add to the film&#8217;s strange voyeuristic vibe, even if the central theme was more satisfyingly explored in later stuff like <em>They Shoot Horses, Don&#8217;t They?</em>. Malone&#8217;s va-va-voom bullet bras and come-hither hairstyle are far from &#8217;30s, however. The barnstorming scenes themselves, with aircraft dangerously maneuvering around pylons, are very well done. Rock Hudson&#8217;s climactic speech, however passionately played by the actor, is a histrionic letdown. On the Sirk-O-Meter, this lies at the same level as <em>Magnificent Obsession</em> but well below <em>All That Heaven Allows</em> and <em>Imitation of Life</em>.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0035564/"><em>Wings for the Eagle</em></a> (1942). Rather cruddy wartime propaganda-cum-domestic melodrama played on Ann Sheridan day during TCM&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tcm.com/2010/suts/index.jsp">Summer Under the Stars</a> (check out their beautiful site, by the way). Sheridan, Jack Carson and Dennis Morgan headline as star-crossed lovers who are also vying for jobs at the Lockheed aircraft plant in Burbank, California. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of this film are the scenes actually filmed at Lockheed with workers furiously aiming to build as many bombers as possible. Those shots are fascinating, but in between we must suffer through the most hokey and predictable plot known to man. The film is directed by Lloyd Bacon in a shrill way with the actors all speaking a decibel or two louder than normal, undoubtedly trying to compete with the movie&#8217;s bombastic score. Normally I like all three lead actors, but the characters they play here are so annoying you wouldn&#8217;t want to spend five minutes with them, much less 90 minutes. The supporting cast is generally filled with predictable stock types, the exception being a pint-sized worker played with gusto by Billy Gilbert (cruelly billed as &#8220;Midget&#8221; in the credits). This movie may have been onto something had it starred Gilbert instead of Sheridan et al.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/22/weekly-mishmash-august-15-21/#comments" thr:count="3" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/22/weekly-mishmash-august-15-21/feed/atom/" thr:count="3" />
		<thr:total>3</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/22/weekly-mishmash-august-15-21/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Muscle Bunnies]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/4hcXR6Y-oA8/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2279</id>
		<updated>2010-08-22T00:01:04Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-22T00:01:04Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Amusements" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="1940s" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="1949" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="bunnies" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="muscle" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Not surprisingly, I was having a real hard time coming up with an idea for this week&#8217;s Two Bunnies &#038; A Duck cartoon. Instead of going through the mind-melting tedium of coloring yet another comic, I decided to stick Harold and Barney (and their star-nosed pal Larry) into one of those cheesy vintage magazine ads [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/21/muscle-bunnies/"><![CDATA[<p>Not surprisingly, I was having a real hard time coming up with an idea for this week&#8217;s <a href="http://twobunniesandaduck.blogspot.com/">Two Bunnies &#038; A Duck</a> cartoon. Instead of going through the mind-melting tedium of coloring yet another comic, I decided to stick Harold and Barney (and their star-nosed pal Larry) into one of those cheesy vintage magazine ads that involve cartoon panels. Leafing through a 1949 issue of <em>Popular Mechanics</em>, I found the perfect ad!</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://twobunniesandaduck.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_20.html"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/bunnies64.jpg" alt="bunnies64" title="bunnies64" width="490" height="716" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2280" /></a></div>
<p>
<p>Excellent timing, since we recently watched the documentary <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1151309/"><em>Bigger, Stronger Faster</em></a> (about one guy&#8217;s conflicted relationship with steroids and muscle building). The cartoon <em>sans</em> bunnies:</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/bunnies64_ad.jpg" alt="bunnies64_ad" title="bunnies64_ad" width="490" height="411" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2281" /></div>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/21/muscle-bunnies/#comments" thr:count="1" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/21/muscle-bunnies/feed/atom/" thr:count="1" />
		<thr:total>1</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/21/muscle-bunnies/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[She&#8217;s Hot, She&#8217;s Sexy, She&#8217;s Dead]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/ks565XLeuAA/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2277</id>
		<updated>2010-08-23T16:28:26Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-19T01:13:43Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Cathode Rays" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Video" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="1980s" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="1989" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="lucille ball" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s video is the opening of CBS&#8217;s tribute to their recently deceased comedy queen, Lucille Ball, broadcast April 26, 1989. I may have watched this when it originally aired. Lucy&#8217;s death was a huge deal that year, garnering the kind of media coverage usually reserved for world leaders and royalty.
On a related note, of late [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/18/shes-hot-shes-sexy-shes-dead/"><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s video is the opening of CBS&#8217;s tribute to their recently deceased comedy queen, Lucille Ball, broadcast April 26, 1989. I may have watched this when it originally aired. Lucy&#8217;s death was a huge deal that year, garnering the kind of media coverage usually reserved for world leaders and royalty.</p>
<p>On a related note, of late we&#8217;ve been watching a lot of <em>I Love Lucy</em>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0006IUE0C/inmyroom">third season DVD set</a> (a gift for Christopher&#8217;s birthday). This was the first season after Little Ricky was born. Although it contains a lot of hilarious episodes, the darn baby gets dragged out <em>all the time</em> and it stops the comedy dead in its tracks. Lucy and Desi Arnaz must have realized what negative impact Little Ricky had, since the following season they bounced back with a baby-free trip to Hollywood. I do believe the show hit its peak during seasons four (Hollywood) and five (European trip).</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mWExsUcTHSQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mWExsUcTHSQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
<p>More of CBS&#8217; Lucille Ball memorial tribute: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_FgFnWW5w0">Part 2</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az50JcZ-EYg">Part 3</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66t6b008Y5M">Part 4</a>.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/18/shes-hot-shes-sexy-shes-dead/#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/18/shes-hot-shes-sexy-shes-dead/feed/atom/" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/18/shes-hot-shes-sexy-shes-dead/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Mishmash: August 8-14]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/SKjq-lu1LCQ/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2266</id>
		<updated>2010-08-16T21:03:30Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-16T01:17:36Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Paper" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Roundup" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Vinyl" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="bob hope" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="dusty springfield" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Body Snatcher (1945) and I Walked with a Zombie (1943). Have you ever shopped at the retail dumping ground Big Lots!? One of my pleasures of the past year is finding out about their DVD section. We&#8217;ve gotten a lot of old movies and TV shows there — cheap! My latest find is this [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/15/weekly-mishmash-august-8-14/"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037549/"><em>The Body Snatcher</em></a> (1945) and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0036027/"><em>I Walked with a Zombie</em></a> (1943). Have you ever shopped at the retail dumping ground Big Lots!? One of my pleasures of the past year is finding out about their DVD section. We&#8217;ve gotten a lot of old movies and TV shows there — cheap! My latest find is this Val Lewton double bill on a single DVD for only three bucks. Re-watching them this week reveals that these are excellent b-movies, atmospheric and amazingly effective for such low budget ventures. All in all, the only fault I could find in both is their casting of bland leading men (James Ellison in <em>Zombie</em> and Russell Wade in <em>Body Snatcher</em>). <em>The Body Snatcher</em> is the better known of the two, thanks to Boris Karloff&#8217;s chilling performance as a 19th century corpse wrangler for a doctor (Henry Daniell, also good) who takes his job a wee bit too seriously. Horror icon Bela Lugosi is also in the cast, but he has a nothing role and doesn&#8217;t do much with what little screen time he has. Despite the flaws, the film has all the making of a classic chiller. True, some scenes are rather pat and unnecessary, but it does have atmosphere to spare and I was unprepared by the outright creepiness of the climax. <em>I Walked with a Zombie</em> is one of those special films that I have a long history with, having first heard of it via Danny Peary&#8217;s first <em>Cult Movies</em> volume from the early &#8217;80s (anybody else own this unsung book?). When finally viewed on American Movie Classics channel, I fell in love. Revisiting it now, the film&#8217;s flaws become more apparent but it&#8217;s never lost its creepy luster. One of the highlights is Frances Dee&#8217;s subtle performance. She strikes the proper mix of curiosity and strength as a nurse who is shipped to a mysterious island to care for a rich man&#8217;s wife (who seems gripped by a zombie-like spell executed by the locals). Tom Conway as the husband is pretty good, but the film belongs to Dee and perhaps the seven-foot tall zombie whose presence says a lot for a guy who never utters a word. The photography in this film is magnificent. Jaw-dropping. This was directed by Jacques Tournier, who mined similar atmospheric territory in later stuff like <em>Out of the Past</em>. What Tournier and Lewton did on a limited budget ought to be studied by today&#8217;s filmmakers.<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/033039343X/inmyroom"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/book_dusty.jpg" alt="book_dusty" title="book_dusty" width="170" height="268" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2267" /></a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/033039343X/inmyroom"><em>Dusty</em></a> by Lucy O&#8217;Brien. For being such a well-regarded singer, there are actually few books written about the life and music of Dusty Springfield. With her biography <em>Dusty</em>, British music journalist Lucy O&#8217;Brien does an excellent job of tracking the peaks and valleys of the beehived diva&#8217;s incredible career. As a matter of fact, a more appropriate title for this book would also belong to one of Dusty&#8217;s albums — <em>See All Her Faces</em>. One of the great contradictions about Dusty is that she never truly reconciled her bejeweled and fabulous image as a white lady who could sing black with her inner Mary Catherine O&#8217;Brien, the insecure, secretly lesbian little cockney girl. It&#8217;s kind of a recurring theme throughout her career, and it&#8217;s to O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s credit that in addition to intricately covering the recording sessions of her albums that these white/black, gay/straight, image/reality themes are a constant. Even though it&#8217;s written in a straightforward style with a few errors, O&#8217;Brien writes with great detail, illuminating every phase of Dusty&#8217;s career with liberal interview quotes. It&#8217;s a nifty biography which covers a lot of stuff I previously knew little of (especially her &#8220;lost&#8221; years in the mid-&#8217;70s when she became a reclusive party gal in L.A.). The book also contains a nice discography collecting all her 1959-99 recordings.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0036836/"><em>Four Jills in a Jeep</em></a> (1943). Pleasant WWII fluff, I rented this mostly because it was a late-period vehicle for Kay Francis (whom I find fascinating). This was based on the true story of Francis joining Carole Landis, Mitzi Mayfair and Martha Raye as they entertain troops overseas for the U.S.O. Alas, whatever promise the film has for a realistic portrayal of life on the front is tossed in favor of forgettable numbers starring guest Fox contractees Alice Faye, Betty Grable and Carmen Miranda. As for the main quartet of ladies, it&#8217;s a mixed bag. Martha Raye was always an obnoxious delight, even if she was getting somewhat cartoonish at this point (the denture commercials were still decades away). The obscure Mitzi Mayfair was toothy and bland, with a double-jointed dancing shtick that verges on circus sideshow weirdness. Smart, blonde Carole Landis was a surprise, earthy and completely radiant in a timeless way (unfortunately the actress committed suicide in 1948, cruelly cutting short what must have been a promising life). Kay Francis ably plays the group&#8217;s den mother with her usual restrained elegance. The scene in which she gets on the floor and scrubs away was the film&#8217;s only nod to the hardship these women must have endured. Interestingly, the making-of featurette on this DVD reveals that Francis unsuccessfully flirted with Landis during the ladies&#8217; tour — oh, to be a fly on <em>that</em> wall.<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B003B13QQU/inmyroom"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/album_goldfrapp.jpg" alt="album_goldfrapp" title="album_goldfrapp" width="210" height="210" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2268" /></a>Goldfrapp — <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B003B13QQU/inmyroom"><em>Head First</em></a>. I don&#8217;t delve into new music too often, but as soon as I heard the samples of the dreamy &#8217;80s influenced soundscapes on Goldfrapp&#8217;s <em>Head First</em>, I had to download the entire thing. It&#8217;s seems as if Goldfrapp (whom I&#8217;ve heard only sporadically prior to this) is mining parts of the &#8217;80s that might seem cheesy or unhip. The starting point might be the <em>Xanadu</em> soundtrack, both the Olivia Newton John and Electric Light Orchestra sides, perhaps the instrumental break in Air Supply&#8217;s &#8220;Lost in Love,&#8221; too, with bits of Princely funk and experimental synth lines thrown in. Although on paper it sounds like overkill, the album itself is suprisingly consistent and pleasureable with Alison Goldfrapp&#8217;s breathy voice at its center. First single &#8220;Rocket&#8221; is actually one of the weaker tunes, with &#8220;Alive&#8221; and the gentle title track being the peaks and &#8220;I Wanna Life&#8221; standing out as the most authentically &#8216;80 sounding tune (picture something off Steve Winwood&#8217;s <em>Arc of a Diver</em> album fronted by Berlin&#8217;s Teri Nunn). Metaphorically speaking, this album is akin to witnessing Kim Carnes and Laura Branigan getting it on atop a fluffy cloud with a bunch of drooling Care Bears watching — filthy yet fun!<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038032/"><em>Road to Utopia</em></a> (1946). Having never seen a Hope/Crosby/Lamour movie, I jumped at the chance to DVR one when Turner Classic Movies played a marathon of &#8220;Road&#8221; movies during their Summer Under the Stars Bob Hope tribute. Since <em>Utopia</em> seems to be the best regarded of the series, I picked this wintry adventure. Hope and Bing Crosby play 1890s vaudevillians who come into possession of a valuable map and inevitably get caught up with saloon belle Dorothy Lamour in the Alaskan gold rush. Having (unfairly) written off both Hope and Crosby as impossibly smug actors, I was surprised at how appealing they both are here. The duo&#8217;s comfort with each other, and the impressive way they deliver their rapid-fire zingers contribute mightily to this film&#8217;s fun. There&#8217;s actually a lot of progressive stuff going on with a parade of sight gags, fourth wall breaking and self-referential humor (including Robert Benchley as the narrator who occasionally pops into the frame to opine on the proceedings). I also enjoyed the songs by Jimmy Van Heusen and Johnny Burke. The duo must have banged out something like &#8220;Personality&#8221; in a single afternoon, but the tune&#8217;s cleverness (and Lamour&#8217;s fetching performance) are a true delight:</p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_pbgNlw_rEY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_pbgNlw_rEY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045317/"><em>We&#8217;re Not Married</em></a> (1952). Inconsequential comedy in which several couples find out that their marriages by a frazzled old Justice of the Peace (Victor Moore) were not completely legit. The less said about this, the better, but at least the film had a glimmer of hope in the opening segment with Ginger Rogers and Fred Allen as a pair who fraudulently play a happily married couple on a radio program. The two host a cheery breakfast program which is actually nothing but gratuitous product placements, a concept which sounds promising but ends up somewhat flat and dull in execution. Come to think of it, I had a similar reaction to the rest of the film, in which several promising actors (Marilyn Monroe, Eve Arden and Paul Douglas among them) are basically wasted.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/15/weekly-mishmash-august-8-14/#comments" thr:count="7" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/15/weekly-mishmash-august-8-14/feed/atom/" thr:count="7" />
		<thr:total>7</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/15/weekly-mishmash-august-8-14/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Paint Chips Ahoy]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/VG2GX2NHan4/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2262</id>
		<updated>2010-08-13T17:21:36Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-13T17:16:25Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Rubylith" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Video" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="commerical" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="paint" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[How often do you see a TV commercial that truly captures your eyes with beauty and subtlety? The Sherwin Williams campaign with animated paint chips does that for me. These play frequently on The Weather Channel; every time they come on, I sit and stare — they&#8217;re almost hypnotic. Wish I could say the same [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/13/paint-chips-ahoy/"><![CDATA[<p>How often do you see a TV commercial that truly captures your eyes with beauty and subtlety? The <a href="http://www.sherwin-williams.com/">Sherwin Williams</a> campaign with animated paint chips does that for me. These play frequently on The Weather Channel; every time they come on, I sit and stare — they&#8217;re almost hypnotic. Wish I could say the same thing for other W.C. advertisers such as <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/">Newsmax</a> or <a href="http://www.buycrazycritters.com/">Crazy Critters</a>.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ouzYC2vufyc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ouzYC2vufyc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="306"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hWUrM0IZaDQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hWUrM0IZaDQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="306"></embed></object></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/13/paint-chips-ahoy/#comments" thr:count="2" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/13/paint-chips-ahoy/feed/atom/" thr:count="2" />
		<thr:total>2</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/13/paint-chips-ahoy/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Elegy for Chris Dedrick]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/jNM9gmyagHU/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2259</id>
		<updated>2010-08-11T22:20:57Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-11T22:20:57Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Vinyl" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[I head today that Chris Dedrick, main creative force behind influential &#8220;sunshine pop&#8221; band The Free Design, died after battling cancer. That&#8217;s too sad. I hope he&#8217;s in a better place now. No one could write about kites, bubbles, umbrellas and pure unfettered joy like Dedrick.


]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/11/elegy-for-chris-dedrick/"><![CDATA[<p>I head today that Chris Dedrick, main creative force behind influential &#8220;sunshine pop&#8221; band The Free Design, <a href="http://www.weirdomusic.com/wordpress/2010/08/07/founding-member-of-the-free-design-dies/">died after battling cancer</a>. That&#8217;s too sad. I hope he&#8217;s in a better place now. No one could write about kites, bubbles, umbrellas and pure unfettered joy like Dedrick.</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MCjmbKzxFxA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MCjmbKzxFxA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/11/elegy-for-chris-dedrick/#comments" thr:count="1" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/11/elegy-for-chris-dedrick/feed/atom/" thr:count="1" />
		<thr:total>1</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/11/elegy-for-chris-dedrick/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Glorious Cinemascope and Stereophonic Sound]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/xNeqHvRZ9ws/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/09/glorious-cinemascope-and-stereophonic-sound/</id>
		<updated>2010-08-10T01:20:16Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-10T01:00:54Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="hollywood" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[My spouse has written a cogent article on his weblog about Hollywood&#8217;s current obsession with 3D. Like color and wide screen, it&#8217;s all a matter of &#8220;been there, done that.&#8221;
On a related note, this image came off a vintage 1930 or so postcard folder of movie star homes which C. just bought. I spy Norma [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/09/glorious-cinemascope-and-stereophonic-sound/"><![CDATA[<p>My spouse has written a <a href="http://justaskchristopher.blogspot.com/2010/08/3d-wave-of-future.html">cogent article</a> on his weblog about Hollywood&#8217;s current obsession with 3D. Like color and wide screen, it&#8217;s all a matter of &#8220;been there, done that.&#8221;</p>
<p>On a related note, this image came off a vintage 1930 or so postcard folder of movie star homes which C. just bought. I spy Norma Shearer, Harold Lloyd, Will Rogers, Winnie Lightner, Joe E. Brown, Douglas Fairbanks and John Barrymore amongst the faces. See any others?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/moviestars1930.jpg" alt="moviestars1930" title="moviestars1930" width="490" height="323" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2256" /></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/09/glorious-cinemascope-and-stereophonic-sound/#comments" thr:count="2" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/09/glorious-cinemascope-and-stereophonic-sound/feed/atom/" thr:count="2" />
		<thr:total>2</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/09/glorious-cinemascope-and-stereophonic-sound/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Mishmash: August 1-7]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/TLZmVPrkWbs/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2242</id>
		<updated>2010-08-09T02:17:34Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-09T02:05:45Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Roundup" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Vinyl" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="monkees" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="shirley temple" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Art of the Steal (2009). Clearly biased but nevertheless enthralling documentary tracking one of the most valuable art collections on earth. The film&#8217;s first half details Albert Barnes, a Pennsylvania doctor who made a fortune developing an infant eye drop solution, and his efforts to accumulate an impressive collection of Post-Impressionist and early Modern [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/08/weekly-mishmash-august-1-7/"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1326733/"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dvd_artofthesteal.jpg" alt="dvd_artofthesteal" title="dvd_artofthesteal" width="210" height="270" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2243" /></a><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1326733/"><em>The Art of the Steal</em></a> (2009). Clearly biased but nevertheless enthralling documentary tracking one of the most valuable art collections on earth. The film&#8217;s first half details Albert Barnes, a Pennsylvania doctor who made a fortune developing an infant eye drop solution, and his efforts to accumulate an impressive collection of Post-Impressionist and early Modern art. The class-averse, philanthropic Barnes set up his collection as an educational resource for art students, and it stayed that way until Barnes unexpectedly died in the &#8217;50s. Barnes&#8217; will specified that the collection stay intact and preserved in the same building with the paintings arranged in a quirky yet beautiful, Salon-style manner on the walls. In the years that follow, the struggle between good intentions and exploitation magnify as the art&#8217;s value balloons. By the time the collection falls into the hands of a small black college in 1988, the kind of people Barnes despised (society types and politicians) are circling like vultures; what follows is a power play that would do Gordon Gekko proud. An interesting if not too balanced watch, this proves with depressing finality that money and power trumps art and education every time. It was interesting, however, that I could see both sides of the coin and with all the kerfuffle nobody emerges as a true villain (except perhaps the conservative Philadelphia newspaper magnate who ironically specified in his will that his <em>own</em> art collection stay intact).<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061065/"><em>The Face of Another</em></a> (1966). Talky, visually arresting Japanese thriller about a man (Tatsuya Nakadai) who is given a chance to wear a lifelike mask to disguise his horribly disfigured face. This plot device is a springboard for director Hiroshi Teshigahara to explore levels of psychological and personal control, somehow encompassing the subplot of a young woman who is similarly disfigured (as a result of an atom bomb blast, we infer). Although the film is slow paced and obtuse, the odd art direction and wild settings (including a somewhat tasteless German-themed watering hole) kept me intrigued. Teshigahara, who also helmed the better-regarded <em>Woman in the Dunes</em>, throws around every sort of cinematic trick here, making this a slapdash but agreeably weird and atmospheric affair. Actor Nakadai is perfectly chilling in a role that comes off as Dr. Frankenstein and his own monster rolled into one. Honestly, much of the film&#8217;s symbolism went past me, but the meaning of many of the images are nicely pointed out in the video essay included as an extra on Criterion&#8217;s DVD.</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8igH12o2yYA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8igH12o2yYA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0028988/"><em>Heidi</em></a> (1937). Beloved children&#8217;s classic rejiggered as high style Shirley Temple vehicle. Since I read Johanna Spyri&#8217;s <em>Heidi</em> earlier this year, it&#8217;s interesting to note how many liberties the filmmakers took. The book is a love letter to the Swiss countryside and the pious simplicity of its people, as epitomized by the cheery title character; <em>Heidi</em> the film is Hollywood adventure with what was a minor chapter in the book (in which Heidi stays with a rich family) taking up the bulk of the second half. The movie plays fast and loose as a literary adaptation, and Temple is a bit too cloying for this part, but it was entertaining nonetheless. I could even accept the oddly shoehorned musical number in which Temple plays a clog wearing Dutch girl and bewigged French royalty. Shirley and her dimples dominate here, but special mention should be made of actress Mary Nash, who plays Heidi&#8217;s evil governess. Temple and Nash were also memorably teamed in <em>The Little Princess</em>, a slightly better literary adaptation from a few years later.<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00123KD4W/inmyroom"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/album_moremonkees.jpg" alt="album_moremonkees" title="album_moremonkees" width="200" height="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2244" /></a>The Monkees — <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00123KD4W/inmyroom"><em>More of the Monkees</em></a>. My second helping of Monkeemania from <a href="http://www.emusic.com">eMusic</a>. This second album contains the group&#8217;s biggest hit, the utterly fabulous &#8220;I&#8217;m A Believer,&#8221; which ultimately made it the biggest selling LP of 1967. Musically it&#8217;s something of a grab bag, with a haphazard array of gritty garage rock, novelty numbers and Brill Building pop vying for attention. Although many Monkees fans don&#8217;t favor the more commercial, bubblegum sounding music heard here, I kinda dig it. It&#8217;s fascinating to hear what Neil Diamond, Carole King, Gerry Goffin, Jeff Barry et al were coming up with at this point as the Girl Group and Doo Wop/R&#038;B genres were falling to the wayside. Although I&#8217;ve read that Michael Nesmith, Davy Jones, Micky Dolenz and Peter Tork weren&#8217;t too happy with their lack of input on this album, it sure doesn&#8217;t show amongst the LP&#8217;s generally upbeat if scattered tracks. The album contains the rocking &#8220;(I&#8217;m Not Your) Steppin&#8217; Stone&#8221; and &#8220;Mary, Mary,&#8221; the horrid &#8220;Your Auntie Grizelda,&#8221; and Jones&#8217; &#8220;The Day We Fall In Love,&#8221; a piece of mush that only Marcia Brady could possibly love. An interesting snapshot of 1967 pop; I supplemented this album with &#8220;Apples, Peaches, Bananas and Pears,&#8221; a bubblegumeriffic track that the band recorded at the time but didn&#8217;t see fit to release until the &#8217;80s.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067756/"><em>Silent Running</em></a> (1972). Crunchy granola sci-fi with a conservationist message! This is an intriguing bit of pre-<em>Star Wars</em>, post-<em>2001</em> cerebral sci fi, a film that attempts the excitement of the former and the cerebral tone of the latter without quite accomplishing either. The tale of a transport ship full of rare plants and animals being hijacked from returning to a battle-scarred Earth by environmentalist Bruce Dern is still relevant today. This despite it being told in a completely dated way with quaint special effects and a few earnest Joan Baez songs on the soundtrack. The film ultimately rides on Dern&#8217;s thin shoulders; I found him his usually flaky self at the beginning, but he grew on me as the film progressed and in the end I was touched by his plight. Poor Dewey.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0040919/"><em>Unfaithfully Yours</em></a> (1948). Personal experience with the films of Preston Sturges tells me his stuff is either brilliant or crappy; <em>Unfaithfully Yours</em> is one of the crappy ones. The film follows short-tempered, jealous conductor Rex Harrison as he becomes aware that a detective trailed his beautiful wife (Linda Darnell) who may be having an affair. Rehearsing with his orchestra, Harrison becomes consumed by several &#8220;what if&#8221; scenarios, each one more outlandish than the last. While some of the dialogue had the sparkle of earlier Sturges films, I absolutely hated the main character. The screechy Harrison (whom I never really enjoyed) does zero to make this man relatable or sympathetic. The film reaches an absolute low point with an interminable slapstick sequence in which Harrison tries (and fails) to execute one of his schemes. For a supposed light comedy, this film contains many uncomfortably bleak scenes — including one in which Harrison attempts to get Darnell and her alleged lover to join him in a round of Russian Roulette. Yuck. For peak Sturges, stick with <em>Sullivan&#8217;s Travels</em> or <em>The Palm Beach Story</em>.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/08/weekly-mishmash-august-1-7/#comments" thr:count="2" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/08/weekly-mishmash-august-1-7/feed/atom/" thr:count="2" />
		<thr:total>2</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/08/weekly-mishmash-august-1-7/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[New at LitKids &#8211; Heidi]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/9PI1qfLgwis/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2236</id>
		<updated>2010-08-05T00:47:05Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-05T00:47:04Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Art" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Store" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="heidi" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="litkids" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Our favorite literary Swiss Miss, Heidi, makes her debut at LitKids this week. My first version of Heidi had her positioned over the seam where the two book pages overlap, which caused bleeding problems with the silk screening. That didn&#8217;t work out, so instead I moved the girl over to the right and put one [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/04/new-at-litkids-heidi/"><![CDATA[<p>Our favorite literary Swiss Miss, Heidi, makes her debut at <a href="http://www.etsy.com/shop/litkids">LitKids</a> this week. My first version of Heidi had her positioned over the seam where the two book pages overlap, which caused bleeding problems with the silk screening. That didn&#8217;t work out, so instead I moved the girl over to the right and put one of her pet goats (which figure prominently in the book) on the left. Cute!</p>
<p>This print is the last of the six designs I worked on before launching LitKids in April. Which character should I do next? So many possibilities, and it doesn&#8217;t even have to be a kid. <a href="http://www.etsy.com/listing/52981646/heidi-litkids-print">Here&#8217;s the direct link</a> to get a Heidi print.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.etsy.com/shop/litkids"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/litkids_heidi1.jpg" alt="litkids_heidi1" title="litkids_heidi1" width="480" height="355" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2237" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.etsy.com/shop/litkids"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/litkids_heidi2.jpg" alt="litkids_heidi2" title="litkids_heidi2" width="480" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2238" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.etsy.com/shop/litkids"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/litkids_heidi3.jpg" alt="litkids_heidi3" title="litkids_heidi3" width="480" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2239" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.etsy.com/shop/litkids"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/litkids_heidi4.jpg" alt="litkids_heidi4" title="litkids_heidi4" width="480" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2240" /></a></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/04/new-at-litkids-heidi/#comments" thr:count="1" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/04/new-at-litkids-heidi/feed/atom/" thr:count="1" />
		<thr:total>1</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/04/new-at-litkids-heidi/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Mishmash: July 25-31]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/8zrdVN_Uzt8/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2227</id>
		<updated>2010-08-02T02:04:04Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-02T01:50:57Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Paper" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Roundup" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="meryl streep" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="shirley temple" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[American-Made: The Enduring Legacy of the WPA: When FDR Put the Nation to Work by Nick Taylor. The Works Progress Administration program (1933-43) was such a unique endeavor and a fantastic example of American government pulling together to help its citizens. Finishing up Nick Taylor&#8217;s exhaustive history, I was sadly struck by how something so [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/01/weekly-mishmash-july-25-31/"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0553381326/inmyroom"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/book_americanmade.jpg" alt="book_americanmade" title="book_americanmade" width="210" height="284" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2229" /></a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0553381326/inmyroom"><em>American-Made: The Enduring Legacy of the WPA: When FDR Put the Nation to Work</em></a> by Nick Taylor. The Works Progress Administration program (1933-43) was such a unique endeavor and a fantastic example of American government pulling together to help its citizens. Finishing up Nick Taylor&#8217;s exhaustive history, I was sadly struck by how something so big and comprehensive could never be attempted again; the Obama administration has accomplished a few infrastructure building projects that are vaguely WPAish, but they&#8217;re nothing compared with Franklin Delano Roosevelt&#8217;s sweeping reforms to get all unemployed Americans working towards recovery. Taylor&#8217;s history tracks the development of the WPA all the way back to the 1929 stock market crash, its introduction and setbacks (particularly with the arts and theater programs), criticisms, success stories, and finally the program&#8217;s quiet dissolving amidst World War II home front efforts in 1943. It&#8217;s a dense and somewhat dry read, a newspaper-like chronicle populated with a constantly shifting cast of characters (only FDR, his longtime WPA director Harry Hopkins, and fiery theater program head Hallie Flanagan stood out). I enjoyed reading it, however, mostly because it contained <em>lots</em> of details about the program that I never knew. One aspect about the WPA that Taylor brings to light is the fact that it was constantly challenged by Republicans. The opposition even went to such hysterical extremes that many believed the program was hatched by Communists, intending to turn the country into the United States of Russia. The more things change, the more they stay the same, eh?<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094924/"><em>A Cry in the Dark</em></a> (1988). a.k.a the &#8220;dingo ate my baby!&#8221; movie. This was actually a potently arresting film about how gossip, innuendo and media imagery can royally screw up the facts. Meryl Streep and Sam Neill play a real-life Australian couple whose baby goes missing on a camping trip. The child&#8217;s body is never recovered, and the way the quirky, deeply religious couple deals with the tragedy is put under such public scrutiny that Streep eventually goes on trial for murder. This was such a stunningly well-made movie, not just for Streep&#8217;s chameleon-like performance but for Sam Neill as well. The film puts the viewer in another time and place (dig Meryl&#8217;s muumuus!), all the while addressing still relevant issues about media coerciveness and human gullibility. For all I know Streep&#8217;s abrasive but sympathetic Lindy Chamberlain might have no bearing on the real woman she played, but I was blown away by her and the film&#8217;s message.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0891527/"><em>Lions for Lambs</em></a> (2007). A DVD that Christopher bought in a local retailer&#8217;s &#8220;3 for $10&#8243; sale (this was the &#8220;full screen&#8221; version, so basically a quarter of the picture was chopped off). I vaguely remember this as part of the wave of series Gulf War films that flopped at the box office. It&#8217;s actually a very well made movie, expertly crafted by Robert Redford, who also stars along with Tom Cruise and Meryl Streep. I liked the angle of telling three stories that are happening simultaneously in California, Washington D.C. and Afghanistan. Unfortunately, Redford&#8217;s message is flamingly liberal and delivered in a heavy-handed &#8220;preaching to the choir&#8221; way. Redford&#8217;s performance as a jaded professor ironically fares the worst amongst a cast that seems disappointingly flat. On the plus side, Michael Peña and Derek Luke deliver some good acting as a pair of students turned soldiers.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1051245/"><em>Moving Midway</em></a> (2007) and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1047007/"><em>Young@Heart</em></a> (2007). A good week for documentaries. We caught <em>Moving Midway</em> on the Netflix &#8220;Watch Instantly&#8221; function via our Nintendo Wii. It&#8217;s a moderately interesting, somewhat blandly produced look at Southern imagery and tradition as a palatial North Carolina estate (belonging to the director&#8217;s family) is painstakingly moved to escape encroaching suburbia. It&#8217;s thought provoking the way it&#8217;s gradually revealed that the family&#8217;s lineage contains white and African-American blood. Although the execution leaves something to be desired, the film certainly assembles an affable (and talkative) group of people to be around. I hate to sound stereotypical, but those Southern folk sure are <em>nice</em>. <em>Young@Heart</em> is another charmer, about a group of singing retirees who perform offbeat renditions of tunes by the likes of Radiohead and Sonic Youth. Mostly the film takes its leisurely time getting to know the various participants (all as sweet as pie and about as grandparentlike as people could possibly get) as they deal with punishing rehearsals and the loss of fellow choir members. I admire the patience of choir director Bob Cilman, seen in a constant state of worry and/or exhaustion. The film has the strange effect of emphasizing the performers&#8217; lack of skill (lots of strange atonal singing going on here), made worse with a few goofy music videos. Despite that, I was enthralled by the main message here of living life for all its worth. Bravo to the Young@Heart performers, wherever they are.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814255/"><em>Percy Jackson &#038; The Olympians: The Lightning Thief</em></a> (2010). A tween <em>Clash of the Titans</em>, this muddled, CGI-heavy extravaganza seems to have &#8220;wannabe franchise&#8221; written all over it. A put-upon teen (Logan Lerman in Justin Beiber-style haircut) discovers that he&#8217;s half-God, descended from watery Poseidon, and his best friend (Brandon T. Jackson) is actually a satyr entrusted to protect him. The two journey to an <em>X-Men</em> style secret training camp for &#8220;special&#8221; kids, where they and another half-God (Alexandra Daddario) embark on a quest to find magic pearls and rescue the boy&#8217;s mortal ma (Catherine Keener, who shoulda known better). This movie actually had some potential, but much of it is squandered in the film&#8217;s rushed opening. Apparently this is based on a series of popular books. Having never heard of them, I can only divine that something went wrong during the production. The fact that it was overproduced was bad enough, but in the end the movie derails by never deciding if it wants to be a gee-whiz kiddie flick or a smutty and violent teen comedy. Chris Columbus also directed the first Harry Potter movie, coincidence or not?<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0028118/"><em>Poor Little Rich Girl</em></a> (1936). When it comes down to it, Shirley Temple&#8217;s saccharine vehicles were the first real &#8220;old movies&#8221; I ever saw. Our local independent TV station broadcast a Temple flick every weekend; I would make sure to watch (sometimes my mom joined in). Even the bad ones were fun; I suppose little Shirley was my gateway drug for everything you see here! Anyhow, I got reacquainted with <em>Poor Little Rich Girl</em> when it got a recent prime time spotlight on <a href="http://www.tcm.com">Turner Classic Movies</a>. I can see why this is considered one of the quintessential Shirley flicks; she&#8217;s adorable and the direction and storyline are of such quality that even a Shirley-hater would enjoy it. Here she plays the title character, a pampered yet friendly and curious tyke who takes it upon herself to make her own &#8220;vacation&#8221; in the big, mean city. Instead of being raped and killed, little Shirley is adopted by a down on their luck song-and-dance duo (Jack Haley and Alice Faye). The couple absorb the creepily talented tyke into their act and eventually wind up on a radio show, one which happens to be sponsored by the soap company rivaling the one owned by — Shirley&#8217;s dad! Pure Depression-era hokum, for sure, but I loved it. Keep an eye out for the tap dance number at film&#8217;s climax, a thing so long and complex I can&#8217;t fathom Faye and Haley mastering it, much less the 7 year-old Temple.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0021493/"><em>The Truth About Youth</em></a> (1930). Typically creaky early talkie melodrama which takes some unusual turns. Dewy fresh Loretta Young stars as a housekeeper&#8217;s daughter who is engaged to the master of the house&#8217;s loaded son, David Manners. Manners, however, has a thing for hosty-totsy singer Myrna Loy — a situation that becomes more complicated when the guy&#8217;s dad (Conway Tearle) attempts to hide the relationship from the innocent Young. Interesting film, not especially good with some wooden performances by Young and Manners (although his deer in the headlights look is perfect for this role). Conway Tearle was a big matinee idol of the silent era and it&#8217;s interesting to see him here as an older man, one who is still potent as we find out. Mostly the film&#8217;s appeal lies with Myrna Loy in one of her earlier, sexier roles. Her vitality enlivens this otherwise standard fare.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/01/weekly-mishmash-july-25-31/#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/01/weekly-mishmash-july-25-31/feed/atom/" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/08/01/weekly-mishmash-july-25-31/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Lulu&#8217;s Back in Town]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/IC-7fR6Se7o/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2222</id>
		<updated>2010-08-01T01:02:02Z</updated>
		<published>2010-08-01T01:02:02Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Vinyl" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="1960s" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="lulu" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going for an all-&#8217;60s month on eMusic, with Lulu&#8217;s To Sir With Love the latest acquisition. This brief (32 minutes) album was given punchy production and arrangements by, respectively, Mickie Most and future Led Zepplener John Paul Jones. Lulu has a throaty voice with the kind of carefully enunciated phrasing that seems better suited [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/31/lulus-back-in-town/"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002831WOK/inmyroom"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/album_lulutosir.jpg" alt="album_lulutosir" title="album_lulutosir" width="220" height="220" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2223" /></a>I&#8217;m going for an all-&#8217;60s month on <a href="http://www.emusic.com">eMusic</a>, with Lulu&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002831WOK/inmyroom"><em>To Sir With Love</em></a> the latest acquisition. This brief (32 minutes) album was given punchy production and arrangements by, respectively, Mickie Most and future Led Zepplener John Paul Jones. Lulu has a throaty voice with the kind of carefully enunciated phrasing that seems better suited to musical theater than peppy &#8217;60s music (witness the LP&#8217;s goofy closer, &#8220;You And I&#8221;). Despite that, she&#8217;s adorable and the album is a good showcase for her versatility. Everybody knows the beautiful title cut, of course, but there are a few other tracks worth noting, including the jumpy Neil Diamond-penned &#8220;The Boat That I Row&#8221; and &#8220;Best Of Both Worlds,&#8221; a plush ballad in the Dusty Springfield mold. Honestly, the thought of somebody else covering stuff like &#8220;Day Tripper&#8221; and &#8220;To Love Somebody&#8221; fills me with dread, but Lulu (along with those brassy arrangements) manages to make them her own. This album also contains the oft-sampled &#8220;Love Loves To Love Love&#8221; and &#8220;Take Me In Your Arms and Love Me,&#8221; a cover of a somewhat obscure Gladys Knight &#038; The Pips tune. Merely a notch better than the typical album of 1967, perhaps, but real cute all the same — Lulu knows how to bring the groovy.</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FbLs80cuots&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FbLs80cuots&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/31/lulus-back-in-town/#comments" thr:count="1" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/31/lulus-back-in-town/feed/atom/" thr:count="1" />
		<thr:total>1</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/31/lulus-back-in-town/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Child Life, 1959 Style]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/SE-cGL2UvSY/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2217</id>
		<updated>2010-07-29T18:44:35Z</updated>
		<published>2010-07-29T18:44:35Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Paper" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Rubylith" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="1950s" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="illustration" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Here are a few scans of the May 1959 issue of an obscure &#8217;50s kiddie magazine called Child Life. All three are nice examples of stylish child-oriented book illustration of the era, but the magazine didn&#8217;t credit any of the artists — so any help on the IDs would be appreciated! This mag was a [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/29/child-life-1959-style/"><![CDATA[<p>Here are a few scans of the May 1959 issue of an obscure &#8217;50s kiddie magazine called <em>Child Life</em>. All three are nice examples of stylish child-oriented book illustration of the era, but the magazine didn&#8217;t credit any of the artists — so any help on the IDs would be appreciated! This mag was a birthday gift for Christopher, my 1959 baby.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scrubbles/4838901381/"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/childlife0559_cov_sm.jpg" alt="childlife0559_cov_sm" title="childlife0559_cov_sm" width="480" height="659" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2218" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scrubbles/4839514244/"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/childlife0559_girl_sm.jpg" alt="childlife0559_girl_sm" title="childlife0559_girl_sm" width="350" height="247" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2219" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scrubbles/4838902489/"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/childlife0559_pickles_sm.jpg" alt="childlife0559_pickles_sm" title="childlife0559_pickles_sm" width="480" height="334" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2220" /></a></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/29/child-life-1959-style/#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/29/child-life-1959-style/feed/atom/" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/29/child-life-1959-style/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Weekly Mishmash: July 18-24]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/RHbYwGqhwkk/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2203</id>
		<updated>2010-07-26T01:21:21Z</updated>
		<published>2010-07-26T00:58:50Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Celluloid" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Roundup" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Vinyl" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="paris sisters" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="pixar" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Circus Queen Murder (1933). I gave this Columbia &#8216;B&#8217; a shot when it received an unusual prime time showing on a recent Turner Classic Movies night devoted to circus movies. Dapper Adolphe Menjou stars as Thatcher Colt, big city detective who takes a vacation in upstate New York. He and his secretary (the strangely [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/25/weekly-mishmash-july-18-24/"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0023893/"><em>The Circus Queen Murder</em></a> (1933). I gave this Columbia &#8216;B&#8217; a shot when it received an unusual prime time showing on a recent <a href="http://www.tcm.com">Turner Classic Movies</a> night devoted to circus movies. Dapper Adolphe Menjou stars as Thatcher Colt, big city detective who takes a vacation in upstate New York. He and his secretary (the strangely alluring Ruthelma Stevens) are there to relax, but instead they find themselves involved in the shady dealings of a traveling circus with quarreling lovers, and a mysterious tribe of cannibals, and (you guessed it) murder. This is an efficiently made, very watchable little flick somewhat spoiled by the lack of mystery throughout. The murder happens too late in the film, and since the killer&#8217;s identity is plainly telegraphed early on there isn&#8217;t much suspense, either. Despite that, I enjoyed watching this not only for the cast (apparently this was one of two Thatcher Colt/Adolphe Menjou flicks), but for the many similarities between this and <em>Freaks</em>. Although this film is lighthearted mystery and <em>Freaks</em> is terrifying horror, it appears as if Greta Nissen&#8217;s trapeze artist is patterned after Olga Baclanova&#8217;s character in the earlier film. The filmmakers also included a group of vaguely creepy cannibals which call to mind the assorted <em>Freaks</em> freaks. Coincidence or not, the circus backdrop is vividly portrayed and adds some much needed depth to the film.<br />
<img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/poster_castaways.jpg" alt="poster_castaways" title="poster_castaways" width="220" height="323" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2209" /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056095/"><em>In Search of the Castaways</em></a> (1962). Another week, another live action Disney adventure! <em>In Search of the Castaways</em> stars winsome Hayley Mills as a pre-teen who comes across a bottled message sent by her father, a shipping merchant previously thought to be killed at sea. Teaming with her brother, a ship&#8217;s captain and his son, and the French fisherman (Maurice Chevalier) who found the bottle, she goes on a journey that takes the troupe through snowy mountains, flash floods, volcanoes and a menacing band of cannibals (two cannibal movies in one week!). Fun in its own way but it does rank as one of the lesser Disney live action flicks, with scenes that stretch the notions of credibility and provoke the image of Jules Verne spinning in his grave. If the idea of watching people maneuver a giant boulder down a snowy canyon like some sort of king-sized toboggan strikes your fancy, this is the flick for you.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/"><em>Inception</em></a> (2010). Christopher and I took a day off on Friday to do a double feature at the local cracker box cinema; the trippy <em>Inception</em> was one of them. You oughta know by now it&#8217;s about Leo DiCaprio and pals invading another man&#8217;s dreams in an <em>Oceans 11</em> meets <em>Mission: Impossible</em> type scenario. I thought it was a fun way to spend two and a half hours. I found myself lost in the film and admiring (if not exactly being wowed by) Christopher Nolan&#8217;s knack for audience-friendly yet cerebral entertainment; a very similar reaction that befell Nolan&#8217;s <em>The Dark Knight</em>. The story gets very dense at times, introducing characters whose function I couldn&#8217;t figure out (Ken Watanabe?). Although the four dream states never tripped me up, I have to admit to being disappointed that they all have a similar &#8220;action movie set piece&#8221; look that doesn&#8217;t bear any semblance to any dream <em>I&#8217;ve</em> ever had. The special effects are very cool, however. Just be prepared for many scenes of people drinking, rain-soaked, underwater, etc. — this is a film that seems specifically engineered for strategically placed bathroom breaks.<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00123IAZ6/inmyroom"><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/album_parissisters.jpg" alt="album_parissisters" title="album_parissisters" width="226" height="226" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2210" /></a>The Paris Sisters — <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00123IAZ6/inmyroom"><em>Sing Everything Under the Sun!!!</em></a>. The Paris Sisters were a girl trio best known for the moony 1961 hit &#8220;I Love How You Love Me.&#8221; Despite its having four flop singles, their 1967 LP <em>Sing Everything Under the Sun!!!</em> was considered a sought-after cult item for Girl Group collectors until it finally got a CD reissue in the mid-2000s; I got to check it out on <a href="http://www.emusic.com">eMusic</a>. This short, sweet gem of an album is a good showcase for the sultry voice of Priscilla Paris (who also wrote four of its ten tracks). Producers Jack Nitzsche and Jimmy Bowen built a consistent sound for the album that lies halfway between Phil Spector and easygoing mid-&#8217;60s &#8220;beach&#8221; music, a mood that sometimes detours in a nicely atmospheric direction (a dirge-like take on &#8220;It&#8217;s My Party,&#8221; for example) which likely influenced David Lynch and Julee Cruise some 20 years later. Priscilla Paris has an interesting, somewhat sleepy sounding voice, but the true highlight of this album comes when she pulls out an unexpectedly emotional performance on &#8220;See That Boy.&#8221; In just under 2-1/2 minutes, here is the epitome of why I dig obscure &#8217;60s music. I&#8217;m positive that in an alternate universe somewhere it&#8217;s a huge, huge hit.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033149/"><em>They Drive By Night</em></a> (1940). Re-watched this after adding the DVD to my efforts to collect the films of <a href="http://scrubbles.net/joyce.html">Joyce Compton</a>. Joyce appears briefly in the film&#8217;s second half as the ditsy girlfriend of one of the film&#8217;s supporting characters; in my totally biased opinion she holds her own opposite George Raft, Ann Sheridan and Humphrey Bogart. Actually, the first (non-Joyce) half of this film is the kind of cracklin&#8217; working class drama that Warner Bros. did impeccably during this time. It follows truckers Raft and Bogart as they deal with punishing hours and low pay hauling produce on all-night drives, with Sheridan adding a salty cynicism as a waitress whom Raft takes a shine to. It&#8217;s such a cool, supremely exciting movie (even the normally cardboard Raft does a great job), that it&#8217;s a bit of a disappointment when the film shifts gears to shrill murder melodrama with a hysterically overacting Ida Lupino. That plot development is still interesting in a campy way, but it detracts from what would have otherwise been a perfect, gritty film. Although I normally adore Ida Lupino (see <em>The Hard Way</em> or <em>The Man I Love</em>), she&#8217;s too much here; it&#8217;s hard to believe that critics of the day heaped praise on her performance.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1433540/"><em>A Town Called Panic</em></a> (2009) and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0435761/"><em>Toy Story 3</em></a> (2010). Animated films which both deal, directly or not, with our relationship with toys and play objects. <em>A Town Called Panic</em> is an inventive, generally successful French-Belgian stop motion film that weaves a wacky story out of cheap plastic playthings a la army men, farm sets, and cowboys and indians. The cowboy and indian in this instance are two boys who live in a house under the parentage of a stern horse. Although I won&#8217;t go into the plot details, it involves an underwater city, a giant mechanical penguin, and lots of weirdly mismatched farm animals. The absurdist humor throughout actually reflects the way real children play with toys, independent of what they were made for (I don&#8217;t know about you, but <em>I</em> certainly didn&#8217;t use army men to do army battles). This film is too long by a good half hour, but I found it totally charming and bizarre in ways that market-tested Hollywood flicks could never touch. Hollywood flicks excepting those from the mighty Pixar, which brings me to <em>Toy Story 3</em>. What a fabulous way to close out the tale of Andy, Woody, Buzz and the rest of the gang! This film was much more emotionally resonant — and darker — than I ever expected. I appreciated the level of detail that they put in every scene, and the additional characters were so wonderful it almost made me forget the regrettable absence of Bo Peep and that penguin squeaky toy. Probably the most poignant addition is the creep inducing lazy-eyed baby, a character that is set up as a villain but somehow ends up being more sympathetic than the nominal leads. I think it&#8217;s because the baby is presented as a realistic child with adorable cooing sounds and infantile reactions, giving the viewer the uncomfortable notion that abandoned baby doll = real abandoned baby. Speaking of which, the film&#8217;s climax goes to intense, emotional places even previous Pixar efforts like <em>Up</em> didn&#8217;t venture. The much spoken-of final scene was a beautifully done and affecting bit of closure, even though it failed to bring a single tear in me (just raised a lump in my throat) — probably since it went on too long. Yeah, I&#8217;m a scrooge. Despite that minor disappointment, this gets a solid &#8216;A&#8217;.</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/25/weekly-mishmash-july-18-24/#comments" thr:count="3" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/25/weekly-mishmash-july-18-24/feed/atom/" thr:count="3" />
		<thr:total>3</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/25/weekly-mishmash-july-18-24/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forest for the Trees]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/ehJXYHjNNz0/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2198</id>
		<updated>2010-07-24T00:33:58Z</updated>
		<published>2010-07-24T00:32:29Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Art" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Floppies" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="ipad" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="sketchbook" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[This drawing was made while looking out the window at my parents&#8217; cabin in Northern Arizona, using Autodesk SketchbookPro for the iPad. It&#8217;s a fun program to use; they just need to make it easier to save files while you&#8217;re working on them. I&#8217;ve had a couple of times (including on this drawing) where the [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/23/forest-for-the-trees/"><![CDATA[<p>This drawing was made while looking out the window at my parents&#8217; cabin in Northern Arizona, using <a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/pc/index?siteID=123112&#038;id=6848332">Autodesk SketchbookPro</a> for the iPad. It&#8217;s a fun program to use; they just need to make it easier to save files while you&#8217;re working on them. I&#8217;ve had a couple of times (including on this drawing) where the drawing was almost finished, then somehow I got out of SketchbookPro and all the latest work was never saved. I also have an annoying habit of getting into the section where you can rotate or move the drawing, then it ends up getting saved that way. Cool program, needs some fine tuning.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.scrubbles.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sketchbook_trees_sm.jpg" alt="sketchbook_trees_sm" title="sketchbook_trees_sm" width="480" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2199" /></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/23/forest-for-the-trees/#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/23/forest-for-the-trees/feed/atom/" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/23/forest-for-the-trees/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Matt</name>
						<uri>http://www.scrubbles.net/</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Where Have You Been Hiding Out Lately, Honey]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Scrubbles/~3/rRKQnvf1qRM/" />
		<id>http://www.scrubbles.net/?p=2195</id>
		<updated>2010-07-21T18:42:28Z</updated>
		<published>2010-07-21T18:41:50Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Cathode Rays" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Kitsch" /><category scheme="http://www.scrubbles.net" term="Video" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[I barely remember watching this clip from Marie Osmond&#8217;s short lived solo variety series, Marie, when it was originally on circa 1981. This is Marie performing Billy Joel&#8217;s &#8220;It&#8217;s Still Rock &#8216;n Roll to Me&#8221; as a campy duet with herself — what a hoot! Two things I notice now: the costumes have all the [...]]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/21/where-have-you-been-hiding-out-lately-honey/"><![CDATA[<p>I barely remember watching this clip from Marie Osmond&#8217;s short lived solo variety series, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080241/"><em>Marie</em></a>, when it was originally on circa 1981. This is Marie performing Billy Joel&#8217;s &#8220;It&#8217;s Still Rock &#8216;n Roll to Me&#8221; as a campy duet with herself — what a hoot! Two things I notice now: the costumes have all the hallmarks of the legendary Bob Mackie, and Marie was a talented performer for being only about 21 years old. Enjoy.</p>
<p>
<div align="center"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4pv2MzbJ7Jg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4pv2MzbJ7Jg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/21/where-have-you-been-hiding-out-lately-honey/#comments" thr:count="2" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/21/where-have-you-been-hiding-out-lately-honey/feed/atom/" thr:count="2" />
		<thr:total>2</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.scrubbles.net/2010/07/21/where-have-you-been-hiding-out-lately-honey/</feedburner:origLink></entry>
	</feed><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.532 seconds --><!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
