Comments for See Also...

Comment on Occupy Scholarly Communications by WILL UNWOUND #757: “Creative Anarchy: Does it Work?” « Will Unwound

WILL UNWOUND #757: “Creative Anarchy: Does it Work?” « Will Unwound — Mon, 14 May 2012 16:51:28 +0000

[...] What I don’t get is what the Occupy people want. To quote Steve Lawson again: “Like the protestors of Occupy Wall Street, I don’t have clear demands. I don’t have a clear solu… [...]

Comment on Publishers hate you. You should hate them back. by WILL UNWOUND #787: “Creative Anarchy: Does it Work?” « Will Unwound

WILL UNWOUND #787: “Creative Anarchy: Does it Work?” « Will Unwound — Mon, 14 May 2012 16:49:18 +0000

[...] I get what the Occupy movement is against. Capitalism is evil. Wall Street is evil. Big Business is evil. Rich people are evil. I get that. I even get what the Occupy librarians are against. In the words of one prominent library blogger, Steve Lawson, the co-founder of the Library Society of the World: “Publishers hate you. You should hate them back.“ [...]

Comment on Special collections and the public domain by Mark Bellamy LL.M.

Mark Bellamy LL.M. — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:00:37 +0000

to Veronica Cabrera et.al.
In the U.S. and indeed anywhere where a country has joined the Berne convention, you cannot claim copyright in a public domain works. In all instances, sweat of the brow or plain hard work is insufficient to convey copyright. It fails in its attempted being of trans-formative and a new and different creative work.

Comment on Publishers hate you. You should hate them back. by My Answer – The Atlantic Wonders If Publishers Should Worry « Quacking Alone

My Answer – The Atlantic Wonders If Publishers Should Worry « Quacking Alone — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:32:22 +0000

[...] College’s librarian Steve Lawson’s Piece. Lawson’s article is entitled: Publishers Hate You. You Should Hate Them Back. Lawson says: So library-types, let’s get our story straight. Publishers have contempt for the [...]

Comment on Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as a “derivative work” by don’t mind me « info-fetishist

don’t mind me « info-fetishist — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:20:05 +0000

[...] just over here learning stuff, taking notes and going crazy making derivative works. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]

Comment on Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as a “derivative work” by Barbara

Barbara — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:06:10 +0000

Can I sue Cengage for personal injury incurred when my jaw hit the ground? That’s truly audacious.

Comment on Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as a “derivative work” by Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as “derivative work” | clusterflock

Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as “derivative work” | clusterflock — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:15:33 +0000

[...] Steve Lawson’s library blog See Also . . . : Reminder, publishers still hate you. From The Chronicle of Higher Education’s Wired Campus blog [...]

Comment on Publishers hate you. You should hate them back. by Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as “derivative work” | clusterflock

Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as “derivative work” | clusterflock — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:06:10 +0000

[...] Steve Lawson’s library blog See Also . . . : Reminder, publishers still hate you. From The Chronicle of Higher Education’s Wired Campus blog comes this report, E-Textbook Vendor [...]

Comment on Publishers hate you. You should hate them back. by See Also… » Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as a “derivative work”

See Also… » Publishers hate you: readers’ notes as a “derivative work” — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:10:44 +0000

[...] publishers still hate you. From The Chronicle of Higher Education’s Wired Campus blog comes this report, E-Textbook [...]

Comment on Publishers hate you. You should hate them back. by Steve Lawson

Steve Lawson — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:44:14 +0000

Martin, right. I’m pretty sure that the Unshelved authors weren’t suggesting that the reader’s view was entirely correct, only that it was reasonably typical.