I’m not going to comment on the video or the essays (from some great people which are really worth reading, though I would most definitely remove the fake Obama piece -it takes away the strength of what the other essayists have to say) other than to applaud Michael and David’s enthusiasm, but I did want to add and expand upon one small point in the project.

Michael Porter makes a very interesting comment about the inclusion of Hulu, a US-only video streaming service in the list of 101 “really important things to know” on the blog, Rebbetzin Man in Japan “Library 101 or is it?” and one that I would have liked to see made more strongly in the project -

I see Hulu as a demonstration of successful electronic content distribution. I clearly understand many of the reasons *why* this service isn’t offered though a library channel of some sort, but to me, it typifies how far from the mark we have becoming in providing some types of access to electronic content. It is a lengthy conversation that needs specific sources and documents to further the proof of concern that I have here specifically, but I hope this provides some explanation for why that particular resource was in the list.

From my pov it represents an entire front of threats that libraries are not prepared to address any time soon. And that causes me grave concern. It is more than just a fad that iTunes, Amazon, Hulu, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, let you access content electronically that you cannot access through your library. I realize this is a large issue for Public Libraries *at this point*, but that will change imo and we are dangerously lagging in the legal and technical expertise that is require to effective navigate in these waters.

I wholeheartedly agree that we need legal and technical skills not only to make such content available in libraries, as Michael says, but also the skill, will, and momentum to advocate successfully to challenge licensing and contractual agreements that currently prevent or curtail libraries from making electronic content available in the format and method to the public that is permitted by law and library exceptions.

Librarians need the confidence to not buy electronic books that have restrictive lending and printing conditions, or databases with article download limits, or even systems that don’t allow for the straightforward import and export of data. We need to work together, all of us, not just directors and managers, to point out flaws in licenses and products and make the case for change.

This is the kind of skill that really should be a “Library 101″.

ShareThis

Internet Librarian International 2009 is being held in London next week. I will have a presentation at the conference, but unfortunately due to a work travel commitment I am not able to attend myself. Instead, this gave me an opportunity to find a co-author/presenter and explore some  ideas about the role of the catalogue in discovery. I’ve called it, “Adaptability, aboutness, and authenticity: Towards discovery platforms with next-generation catalogues and Linked Data” -

>Next-generation catalogues give libraries an opportunity to better meet user needs and changing search habits, but there is a need for more than innovation at the interface level. Many academic libraries have now implemented software that provides an improved search experience in the catalogue, but libraries also need to be able to anticipate user needs and emerging uses of resources and to provide tools that meet needs one step ahead. Linked Data, associated with the Semantic Web, is one way to open up data to the web to expand the ways that users can be connected to library resources. Linked Data also provides the opportunity to consider how catalogues present resources to users. The paper presents a case study of Work Based Learning as an example of a multidisciplinary academic field in which the notion of authenticity is evolving. The question of whether library catalogues can or should help navigate users to authentic resources is considered.

We enjoyed writing it and thinking about how subject experts and librarians may be able to work together to create new platforms for sharing data within and beyond libraries.

I’ll be following ILI2009 tweets from afar, if you’re going have a fantastic time and learn well!

ShareThis

Cool URIs don’t change, right? But uncool URLs certainly do. For over 7 years, I blogged at blisspix.net and as was the way at the time, my URL was both a handle and identity. Whenever I signed up for a new service, my username was always blisspix. Lately, this has become less popular. I’ve noticed a sharp trend towards using real names, whether on Twitter (where I’d estimate well more than half of those I follow use their real name or some version of it) and Facebook, where many I know who chose a vanity URL chose their own name, myself included. The concept of handles and nicks seems to be dying off. I’m glad I didn’t keep using handles from the IRC and chat days of my youth, but blisspix was not much of an improvement and finally, it is time for it to go.  I would be interested to hear if anyone has researched this change.

Identity crisis issues aside, trying to change a name on existing services is a complete pain. Some services offer this with a single click, like Twitter. Others require you to send a form to request the change, like Dopplr. Flickr doesn’t seem to allow it at all. Facebook was very upfront in saying that creating a vanity name was a one time deal. 

But if you can change your name - there’s fallout. Your existence has changed, and all those nice URLs are going to break. There’s no redirects, just breaking. Presumably, if you are giving up a name it should be available to others to take, but to have links and RSS feeds just die is pretty painful. Twitter does do an ok job of this, if you change your name you can still track older mentions of you, although clicking on what was once your old username will still lead to a broken link. 

There’s no real easy solution to this, but it does bear saying that the way we all need to think about how we represent ourselves online. What may have worked at 20 as a uni student may not work as an older professional. This isn’t about what photos you put on Facebook, or whether you rant about an employer online, but the very act of giving yourself a name, whatever it is, forms an identity that can follow you for a long time so it pays to consider it carefully. голова болит секс

• голова болит секс

голова болит секс

ShareThis

A while ago now, Jodi Schneider floated the idea of setting up a Planet for Semantic Web and Libraries. I had some trouble with various flavours of the Planet and Venus software, so instead I put something I’m calling a ‘Planet Lite’ together in Yahoo Pipes. Let me know if you like it! And feel free to suggest additional blogs, I have only listed a few to start.

Semantic Web & Libraries ‘Planet Lite’: JSON and RSS also available.

Last week, I attended Mash Oop North, an one-day unconference about mashups in Huddersfield, UK. It was a great event, which I wrote up in much more detail over at Libraries Interact. One of the best parts of the day was being able to spend some more time with Yahoo! Pipes, and the Planet Lite is the result after much tinkering and experimenting after I got home. Hooray for action-based outcomes!

• голова болит секс

• порнокартинки с детьми

ShareThis

Despite advocating for neutral design (not tied to one particular platform or device), I have been interested in libraries that are looking at iPhone/Touch/Pre applications to provide catalogue searching, collection information and so on. What I would love to see is a general library app that helps librarians and users find and access libraries all over. As anyone who uses public libraries knows, that information can get buried on council and municipality sites, and even academic libraries have found that their homepage links have been disappearing in increasing numbers.

What could such an app include?

• Maps of all publicly accessible libraries near you (location aware) and at a given location worldwide
• Information about access - can you use the Internet without a membership card? Are there access gates? Are books on open access shelves?
• Are there local traveller services? One thing that has always struck me in all of my travels is how few libraries make available information about the local area in a prominent spot. So often I have had to be buried in the collection to find street directories, local maps or local travel guides, or ask at the reference desk for the librarian’s copy. It has always seemed like an obvious and easy service that libraries could provide since they have the resources already and because libraries are so often located in key areas in cities and towns.
порнозвезда из фильма не родись красивой

What else would you be interested in?

ShareThis

Today I find myself perched in the foyer of the British Library, without enough ID to get a reader’s pass so instead of working, I am making the most of the free wifi here. Or at least I would, but for the service not working on my, ahem, brand new iPod Touch.

Those who follow my Twitter feed would know that I have gone back on forth on the why or why nots to get a Touch or an iPhone. An iPhone didn’t work for me because I don’t use cellular service very much at all, and the price plans didn’t seem logical. I had been holding out for a device that would function as a replacement for a laptop at conferences - eg ability to make videos, take photos, blog on the go etc.

So why did I get a iPod Touch, which doesn’t do most of those things? Apple in the UK are offering the Education bundle which includes a nearly-free iPod Touch, and so I got one yesterday. So far, I’ve loaded it up with RSS readers and social networking apps, but I am hoping to use location aware services that tap into semantic search, like a more accurate Urban Spoon that picks a restaurant for you based on where you are now or the quickest Underground route to get somewhere else.

A barrier to location aware services though is the availability of wifi. At home I can share my (somewhat poor) mobile broadband connection with my iPod using my MacBook. But when out and about, I rely on being able to pick up a connection. Connections with have an authentication service behind them, like that here at the British Library, are problemmatic. The SSID does’t show up (BL), or security apps need to be installed (UTS, Athens airport, EduRoam), or accounts need to be created in a browser (eg The Cloud). While organisations have good reasons for requiring authentication and acceptance of terms and conditions, it can make getting online with a Linux or Mac based system hard, let alone trying to do so with a mobile device. My mobile phone has wifi that I hardly ever use because of authentication layers.

It is very difficult to support platforms like mobile devices which have enormous diversity in operating systems, features and usage in different markets. I have noticed that Blackberries seem to be more popular in London than iPhones were in Sydney, and Push to Talk really does seem to be a feature that only those in the US use. Phones are completely different again in Japan (though I would buy a Japanese phone if I could) and serve very different needs in the African market. How can an organisation possibly provide a service like wifi that will enable all devices to connect easily and securely? How can we steer away from designing apps and authentication just for PCs, Android, or Symbian, or Palm and design universally? Is it even possible?

Beyond authentication, the dream of city-wide wifi seems to be long dead, with many announced project never coming to fruition and existing services mostly being run by a variety of subscription services that greatly restrict where you can get online. For example, I can use The Cloud with my mobile broadband account, but there are no hotspots near me. Yesterday, Ofcom in the UK released a report about Internet take-up across the UK. Turning the figures around, there are a lot of people who don’t have Internet at home (I currently am one of them - there is no phone line in my flat and cable Internet is not wired to my floor). There is a need to provide Internet in and out of the home other than private subscription, and wifi is one way to do it.

ShareThis

With all the distractions of my move across the world, it wasn’t until now (thanks, Jenna!) that I saw “Discovering Linked Data” was published in Library Journal last month. I aimed to cover a few different areas that Linked Data may be useful in, especially research support and discovery layers for catalogues, areas that I was working in at the time of writing the article. I’m really happy with how it turned out.

Open catalogue data is an an issue that arose when I first started working in libraries. I worked in a multicultural music library. I catalogued in more than 60 languages, all original, because our systems didn’t interface with cooperative cataloguing systems (and we had a non-standard cataloguing record, to boot), and the uniqueness of our catalogue in Australia did not make it worthwhile. But surely, there would have been other libraries across the world that we could and should have shared our data with. And I would have liked to share my work, knowing that we were duplicating work with our sister library in another city. We would have been able to identify collection strengths across the world, share resources, and perhaps even find partners to share our collections instead of having to do extensive legwork in obtaining materials in the first place.

I think Linked Data will have a big impact on larger institutions, but smaller ones also have a lot to gain by sharing in ways that were not possible or practical before.

ShareThis

The blog may have been quiet of late, but there has been a great deal happening out there. From linked data developments (especially at the Library of Congress) to some great new mobile tools, it’s been a busy couple of months.

Regular blogging on these developments and others will resume in the next couple of weeks, as I’ve been otherwise occupied by a move to London. I will leave Australia (again, I moved back in August last year) next week. I’m thrilled that the timing means I will be able to attend Mash Oop North in early July and will report back on that event here.

Amusingly enough, what has occupied quite a bit of my attention in the move is working out what to do for broadband and mobile service. I have been debating the pros and cons of buying an iPhone, or a netbook, European data roaming and mobile broadband. I have decided to be sensible and stick with my current hardware, but a lazyweb question if I may. Does anyone know of a good provider for mobile broadband roaming across Europe? Something like Vodafone Passport for broadband?

ShareThis

Today is Ada Lovelace Day, a day to celebrate women in computing. Hooray! Read more about great women in computing at ACM-W.

One of the things I love about librarianship is that there are so many opportunities to do amazing things with computers, from social networking, to blogging, to sysadmin’ing, to programming. And I’ve been inspired by so many others, irrespective of gender. Some people who inspire me right now are on the list at Shovers and Makers doing wonderful things every day.

I’ve been the only girl in the university computer club, and I’ve built computers out of spare parts, and typed up programs from the back of magazines in the 80s, but ‘computing’ never seemed like an actual career option at the time. So I’m glad that librarianship has so many ways to explore your interest, no matter whether that’s putting on exhibitions, helping people at the refdesk, or writing about data. And a lot of that has to do with the inspirational people who have led the way in defining what this profession is about.

ShareThis

Last night I was watching a few news clips on the BBC News website, and at the end of each video was links to “more like this”. I made a comment on Twitter:

“End of BBC news videos on their site suggests ‘more like this’. Don’t really want to watch ‘more like this’ if I’m watching sad news.”

Jodi Schneider responded:

“@blisspix That suggests mood-based recommendation for news outlets. Interesting! “More like this” “Opposite mood” etc.”

Now that’s an interesting idea, and it got me thinking about recommendation systems in general. Mostly I’ve been unsatisfied with everything from Amazon to iTunes Genius. Their algorithms are, to my mind, too blunt.

Etsy’s explore options (colours, pounce, time machine, geolocator, etc) are an amazing leap forward into more meaningful browsing and recommendation. Whether you are into handcrafts or not, this site is an excellent example of making the most of metadata.

But we can go much further, radical recommendations, and I think it’s something librarians can and should be involved with. We have a longstanding strength in readers’ advisory and I think you’d be hard-pressed to find a librarian who has not heard of Nancy Pearl’s Book Lust.

There are other efforts already to provide online recommendations on what to read next, like ReadMe from MetaFilter, What do I Read Next? from Gale, and both human and automated recommendations in LibraryThing. Yet they are not at the depth I would like to see - the depth that people like Nancy Pearl provide. Now to be clear, I don’t want to replace humans and the strength of emotion and individuality in recommendation, but I do want a more reliable way to explore what I should read, watch, or listen to next. And that’s likely to be people-generated. I do want a recommendation that will take into account mood, but also things such as -

• Am I buying this item for the library? Then I care about how durable the book is, how up to date it is, how relevant it is to courses.
• Am I buying this item for me, to read or listen to on a train/plane trip/while sitting by a pool on vacation? I’m going to want something different for all of those.
• What are the instruments being played in the music? I don’t really like auto-tune or drum machines, for example.

The very human nature of recommendations though, is exactly what makes it so difficult.  I find music recommendations particularly troublesome, whether from AllMusic, Amazon, iTunes Genius or Last.fm. They are usually too broadly applied to really be of use or don’t reflect how I feel. For example, the ‘mood’ for my favourite band, Radiohead, includes the following:

• Cold
• Epic
• Sprawling
• Austere
• Paranoid
• Tense/Anxious
• Cathartic
• Distraught
• Insular

And I don’t feel that way at all when I listen to their music, so these options really don’t help me.

How can we use the strength of individual listeners and readers? And how can this be done while protecting privacy? In libraries, we have been stepping into recommendations at the catalogue level only tentatively, both because we don’t actually have any of that data most of the time and to protect the privacy of individuals. Is there a way to collect deep, meaningful recommendations about people who like particular books + videos + websites + information without creating a dangerous profile? That will be a key challenge of the Semantic Web.

So how can recommendations be improved, made more granular, more relevant? Small, distributed pockets may be a way. Information collected at the listening level (eg last.fm, iTunes Genius) could be queried against opinions of dozens of reviewers, and hundreds of fans, and against statistical data like “bands that have supported this band on tour”, “bands that covered this track” (available in MusicBrainz) and information about what guitars they play with. There shouldn’t be just one entry on AllMusic for a band, but rather many different pieces of information scattered across the web, connected using Linked Data giving strength and flexibility to be able to say “I am looking for happy music made in a cold climate in the mid 90s with slightly political lyrics that has a similar instrument profile to Ride” and in the next minute want to listen to dance music, and be able to find just what you’re looking for.

Much of this is part of the vision for the Social Semantic Web, Alexandre Passant from DERI has a great slidedeck on this topic:

On a related note, the author of Collective Intelligence in Action was recently interviewed by ReadWriteWeb about recommendations, particularly in the US service, Netflix.

Do you have ideas or examples of great recommendation systems? Leave a comment!

ShareThis