psst Want to buy a Link?

2007-09-08T05:06:00.000-04:00

My name is Tim and I’m a serial link seller, I have said it I buy and sell Links!

Now don’t go looking at me like that it’s not like it’s a crime or anything, yet as an industry we are approaching the subject of buying links like it is, indeed I cannot think of another subject that so polarises an industry.

The arguments put forward by both sides get bashed down, we fight it out in a struggle with one side never quite convincing the other and ultimately it was going to come to a head. The first victim of the war of the links was John Chow but was he a victim? Did he deserve to no longer rank for his own name? Does it damage him or his business model?

Ultimately John will be forever known as the guy Google removed from the index, from an outsiders point of view this would seem a rather petty act after all John Chow is hardly a top search term is it, as penalties go not ranking for your own name seems quite mild. Let us ignore the personal branding issues and the idea that the act was petty it certainly sent a warning shot across the bow of many SEO’s ships, Google was making a statement that they controlled the index and they could delist or penalise anyone at any time. I think for many the message may not have gotten through and so Google adopted plan two the battle of PR

Public relations is something Google is good at they are one of the few companies in history whose motto is almost as well known as their name. They are also experts at turning negatives into positives, a good example is when a Google user wrote to Google to complain that while using their ‘beta version’ of Google transit (a public transport route plotter) he was left on the wrong side of a multi lane highway. Google response; send him a Superman out fit. So you would expect a charm offensive instead we get to see Matt Cutts again, and again lashing out at the community now Matt is a charming guy and he has helped many people out just think what the web spam unit would be like without him? Did you just shudder?

But why is any of this important why is Google so worried about paid links are they destroying the web are link buyers no better then email spammers?

The humble hyperlink has come along way since its first appearance in the 1960s now it is the central part of the web infrastructure its also a critical method for search engines to collate, analyse and determine relevancy of pages and relationships between pages and sites. Gone are the days where if you wanted to link to a page you just did, now you are making a statement!

Googles’ algorithms rely on links as statements the presumption is that if there is a link on a page then their must be some relevancy, a reason it was there. Googles’ algorithms are smart, and Google quickly realised people don’t always link to relevant things so it created ever more complex mathematical pattern detection systems to weed out irrelevant links to discounting any weight that they parse. Paid Links present a problem because a good paid link (i.e one that’s worth paying for) are exactly that relevant to the page that the link is on. After all the aim of the link is to generate leads and traffic it’s unlikely a knitting web site will generate to many leads for a sports car company!

But the real problem for Google is it doesn’t matter if the person is out to game the system or to just increase the potential clients, they are both looking for links that are on target and relevant and if the links are on target and relevant can they really be spam and if we presume for the sake of argument they are not spam why should there relevancy not be counted?

Now this is the point that you say but Tim not all people are out to get relevant links some just buy links for search engine traffic or links on high Page Rank sites and of course you would be right but and here is the big ‘but’ Google already has a method of discounting these links, remember that clever algorithm they have designed to pass juice only to relevant content if the page contents are not relevant to each other then Google will discount it, so either Googles’ system does not work in which case they need to be putting their money into getting it working not hounding SEO’s or it does work and there is another reason that suddenly highly relevant links are now spam?

What is Google – it’s a simple question ‘what is Google’ the answer of course one of the largest advertisement companies in the world, if not the largest. How does it make money? Simple it sells sponsored links on its search pages, now go back a moment and think that through, how does Google make money? Paid links are as much a part of its business model, its links are not considered to be spam because they pass no weight which of course they don’t need to yet those bought and sold by others are?

So why is Google fighting a battle it cannot win? Two reasons 1 to put the genie back in the bottle, you see Google has a dirty secret when it released the Google Toolbar it included a little green bar suddenly the world didn’t care about traffic stats when linking or paying for links now all they cared about was the green bar. Page Rank or rather the publication of page rank for sites meant a whole industry was set up around the idea of enhancing, and promoting a green bar almost cult like in its fever to find ever more of the green stuff. Google effectively caused the purchasing of off topic irrelevant links with the Google toolbar now it feels it must put the genie back in, though to be fair most of these links already we’re being discounted. This hard stance then is more about education then retribution, hence the recent penalties handed out to leading directories again hardly anything more then hand slapping but the message I think is slowly getting through. The second more problematical issue is PPC campaigns are becoming more expensive while link building is becoming cheaper which will big companies the sort Google relies on choose?

Google cannot stop paid links, no one can, I’m sure by the time you read this at least 1 US state will have on its books a law to prevent paid links but even legislation is not going to stop it happening. Branding those who practice link purchasing as part of a larger strategy spammers is not the way to encourage us to stop all you do is alienate your potential allies. I think Google has to do something about page rank I like many directory owners have profited from naive people looking at high ranking directories as some great tool I won’t lie and say I wasn’t pleased when a PR update saw my directories go from 5s to 6s not because I was a member of the green bar club just the dollar one. My sites got high PR from a mixture of interlinking good link baiting both paid and non. My clients continue to provide highly relevant information to countless hundreds of blogs and sites and I challenge Google to say otherwise!

Tim

p.s At least one of the links in this article was paid for so Google can you tell which one? (sorry Melanie only kidding honest)
no links were paid for during the writing of this post!

Thanks Tim,
What a great write...funny guy too!

Visit Tim's sites
Venture Skills Blog
Site reviews from SEO Forensics
Affiliate and Internet Marketing

--Melanie

Sphinn This
**We Require a Link Back Please.

Where is the Internet Going in Our Society

2007-08-11T06:50:00.000-04:00

Hello, I am Jack Prough, Melanie's husband. Melanie or Baby as most of you know her asked me to get some thoughts down for you in her Blog. I am not a web developer of any nature, but I have some philosophical ideas about the "net" and what our grandchildren will be doing with it.

A report issued today by private equity firm Veronis Suhler Stevenson suggests the amount of money spent on Internet advertising will reach $61.98 billion, surpassing newspapers as the #1 ad medium in the United States in the next four years

This is a fairly large statement, agreed. However, consider this, the New York Times print version of their news becoming obsolete. I offer this.......

The reality of these 2007 usage figures adds up to 1,173,109,925 Internet users worldwide. Only 55 million newspapers are sold each day, 59 million on Sunday in the US, and they are published by 1,457 companies. The punch is.... The number of newspaper companies in the US is down 293 newspaper companies, which is about -17%. Online news however, is booming. 31% of all US residents read the news online 3 or more days a week in 2006. Newspapers were only read more by a slight margin, 40%. News print is consistently year over year losing the battle to online news. So maybe our great grandchildren will read about newspapers in their computer teaching modules in school.

These are clearly not necessarily bad things. The daunting reality is that the Internet has had a far greater effect on a global scale than any other form of media, and perhaps greater than most inventions.

Our children are writing their journals in Blogs. They are "Googling" more information than we ever even could have accessed in our entire childhood. The learn lessons in school on a PDA of PC. Its a very strange thing considering, we most likely didn't have a PC in our childhood....If we did it may have been a very early version like the TRS 80 from Radio Shack. In just a very short time the advancements of the PC and specifically the Internet have changed our lives and how we work, play, teach, and entertain ourselves forever.

Well, that's all for now. Hopefully Melanie will proof read this for you, that might make is legible. I know you are all used to Melanie's tag line...But sadly I have none. I will work on it for next time.

Jack Prough

**We Require a Link Back Please.

Cog's SEO Blog Feeds the Need

Where Has My Wife Gone, Did Google De Index Her?

psst Want to buy a Link?

Where is the Internet Going in Our Society