Serene Musings

Moving to Substack

2025-02-07T16:01:00.002-05:00

A few years ago, I decided to move my writing endeavors over to Medium. That didn't really last, however. Now, I've decided to try out Substack.

So from now on, I will be posting my articles there instead of here. If you're interested in continuing to read my stuff, you can subscribe there for free. Click here for the page. You'll have to set up a free Substack account, I think. But you can get new posts emailed to you whenever I publish them.

Standing at the Precipice of a New Dark Age

2025-01-24T16:10:00.002-05:00

I read part of an article – just a long paragraph, really – from a recent edition of The Atlantic. It was about the rise of what the author called the “New Obscurantism,” referencing the Enlightenment notion of intellectual darkness and irrationality. He made the argument that across Europe "health quacks and influencers," together with spiritualists and political charlatans, are creating this new era of irrationality and magical thinking. He noted rising interest in everything from runes and crystals to the anti-vax craze. He used the example of Tucker Carlson, a right-wing mouthpiece who was even too crazy for Fox News, claiming that a demon attacked him and left visible claw marks.

The author was talking specifically about Europe, but of course all this is true here, too. I always like to imagine Europe as this bulwark of democratic socialism and post-Christian rationality, but then I read stuff like this. It makes me feel like maybe we really are entering a new dark age. But one in which we have the population and technology of the 21st century. A terrifying combination. I would give anything to know how this will all be viewed a hundred years from now, or 500 years from now. Will there even be anyone around then to do the analyzing?

A lot of people seem to be wondering how they can balance being informed with remaining sane for the next four years. For me, it means giving up the need to be informed at all. Yesterday I read some news about Trump's first few days in office. I found myself so angry and helpless that I wanted to send nasty messages to the family and friends who I know voted for him. That's obviously not healthy.

It just reminds me that I have to return to what I've been saying for a while now: I need to focus on what's in front of me. My family, my friends, my job, my hobbies. Live life to the fullest. Spend my money. Enjoy myself. Do what makes me happy. Those are the things I can control.

But this sure is not the world I imagined entering my 50s in. When I was a kid, I sometimes thought ahead to my future self (who doesn't?). Being born in 1975, it was always easy to know when I'd be 25 and 50 and 75 years old. So 2025 is a year I used to think about, knowing it would be the year I turned 50. I definitely didn't imagine it being like this. I never dreamed I'd be writing about fears of the world entering another dark age. It's crazy.

Making America the Confederacy Again

2025-01-22T13:44:00.001-05:00

To understand the new vision for America that Trump and the Republican Party are establishing in 2025, it's important to realize that it's nothing new. It's not groundbreaking, or innovative, or forward-looking.

It's basically just the Confederacy 2.0.

Of course Trump isn't trying to preserve a slave empire, but slavery isn't the only thing that the Confederate States of America was about. It was also about states' rights and distrust of centralized authority, and it was deeply committed to fundamentalist Christianity and toxic notions of freedom and individualism.

These ideas have been around a long time, and they represent a deep sickness in this country. This sickness has been passed from generation to generation through pulpit and parents, occasionally clearing up in some lines, but always finding new hosts to prey upon. It's been around since the very beginning, clear back to the colonial days.

It reared its head during the 1780s when this country's first government was weakly organized under the Articles of Confederation. It was the central issue that caused the long struggle of the constitutional convention in 1787. The calling card was "states' rights." Of course, states' rights has always meant the right to discriminate indiscriminately. It meant that in 1787 and it means that today.

This American sickness was at the forefront of countless political fights and struggles throughout the 1790s. Even when those fights began to fade and the country entered the period of history known as the Era of Good Feelings, the sickness was still there incubating, particularly in the South.

The secession of the South and its formation of the Confederacy was nothing more than an attempt to revert back to the 1780s and the Articles of Confederation - a collection of mostly autonomous states with a weak central government and endless protections for the wealthy and powerful.

And that's what the South of the Civil War era was. It was a land where the majority lived at subsistence, and a select few, with money and land, had all the advantages. They didn't even have to go fight in the war - for every 20 slaves on a farm, one man was exempt from the draft. A large plantation with dozens of slaves could earn exemptions for every son and foreman.

This is the America that Trump is taking us back to. This is what your friends and family and neighbors voted for. They voted to make America the Confederacy again. Plantation owners have been replaced with billionaires, and dirt farmers have been replaced by a coalition of blue collar workers and their upper middle class bosses. But the growing gap between the haves and the have nots is the same as in the 1860s. The sick fundamentalist Christian beliefs are identical, too, and so is the toxic notion of freedom and individuality - a notion that says my freedoms are more important than your freedoms. In the 1860s, the fear-mongering was about an intrusive federal government that was bound and determined to upend the southern way of life. Today, it's about immigrants and trans people killing your wives and eating your dogs. In the Confederacy, there were even those that wanted to expand across all of central and South America. Today, it's Canada and Greenland.

The America that is being established is nothing new. In fact, it's as old as America itself. It's a new flare up of an old disease. The question is whether it will finally kill the country for good.

Manipulating Gen Z (and everyone else)

2025-01-19T14:53:00.004-05:00

I started using TikTok in 2020 as a way to promote my music. It's become one of my favorite ways to pass time during slow periods at work. So I've been following the drama this week about it being banned. In fact, I've been following it since 2020 when the banning was first proposed -- by Trump.

Yes, Trump was the first to propose banning TikTok, back in 2020. The popular theory on TikTok at the time was that it was because TikTokers supposedly bought out all the seats to one of his campaign events and then intentionally didn't show up. The result was that the event was very poorly attended. I don't know if that's really why he suddenly wanted to ban TikTok in the waning days of his first presidency, but that's what people were saying at the time.

He's apparently flip-flopped on this issue now. Why would that be? Clearly because he's seen an opportunity for political points.

I've found it very strange, in the last week, how the CEO of TikTok has suddenly appeared out of the woodwork. I'd never seen him or heard of him before this week. Now he's testifying before Congress and posting videos on TikTok, which TikTok undoubtedly promoted to every possible American user.

And in those videos, he was talking about how they were working with "President Trump" to solve the problem.*

Despite that, the app was shuttered and taken offline for Americans at 10:30 pm Saturday night, much sooner than anyone expected. Biden had already said he wasn't going to enforce the ban, and Trump had already publicly stated that he would "probably" delay the ban.

So why did they shutter the app, especially given that the ban didn't even require that to begin with? It only required the app stores to stop allowing new downloads and updates.

The app only remained shuttered for about 12 hours. Today, this was the message on my Android version of TikTok:

It's pretty clear to me what has taken place. Trump's team has obviously been in talks with TikTok. TikTok clearly agreed to shutter the app for 12 hours, then bring it back up and give credit to Trump, to make him look like a hero. They did this in exchange for his promise to delay the ban (he can delay it up to 90 days) and then get the Republican-led Congress to overturn it. He controls the GOP, so he can force them to all change their votes (this ban was passed originally with broad Republican support).

That's the only explanation that makes any sense for the events of the last 12 hours. There is no logical reason, otherwise, why TikTok would shutter the app when they didn't have to, or why they have so openly and and shamelessly namedropped Trump in their relaunch message.

This is a perfect example of the kind of manipulation and gaslighting that is going to become the norm for the next four years, as the media and corporate America all fall in line to the new reality of an American oligarchy led by a virtual dictator. America as we know it is pretty much finished, I think.

*The TikTok CEO, who is a Singaporean, had the nerve in his TikTok updates to wield the old "Freedom of Speech" line. Dude, you're a Southeast Asian who is the CEO of a Chinese company. The First Amendment does not apply to you or your company, and has no bearing whatsoever on this case! In fact, his manipulating, propagandistic messages were EXACTLY the sort of thing that caused Congress to ban the app in the first place! His messages were basically Chinese propaganda, using specious arguments about our own constitution! But that's beyond the grasp of 90% of the teenagers and 20-somethings who use TikTok. His videos had millions of likes.

Hello ... ello ... llo ... lo ... o?

2025-01-13T22:18:00.000-05:00

I started this blog in 2006, and it looks like 2024 was the first year I failed to make even one post. Oh well. I sat down tonight to write something reflective and profound, but then remembered I'm completely incapable of profundity.

I Googled "profound" for an image search, and most of the results
were like this. Apparently Profound is the name of a skin tightening
treatment? Somehow, it seems apropos.

I don't have much to say these days. Actually, that's not true. I still have a lot to say, I just don't really feel like sitting down and writing it. Middle age has wrought a lot of changes in me. One is that I don't generally think of myself as a writer anymore. I guess I finally gave up.

So rather than try to say something profound, I thought I'd share this funny review I just saw on Amazon, left for my book Washington's Nightmare. It was posted a couple of years ago, but I'm just seeing it for the first time. Most of the reviews are really good. If that weren't true, this would probably bother me more than it does. But instead, I just think it's funny.

...[T]he writing is so amateurish that I began to wonder about the accuracy of the facts the author presents. His attempt to explain socialism is so riddled with errors that it is laughable, and his attempt to explain the difference between capitalism and socialism reads as though it had been lifted from a children's book.

It's kind of funny because I spent a lot of time writing that chapter on the Socialist Party, and since I knew I wasn't an expert on the topic, I actually had an acquaintance of mine - a retired Social Studies teacher - read over my explanation of socialism and give me pointers. I thought, at the end, I'd done a pretty decent job of providing an easy-to-understand overview. Oh well, can't please everyone!

My Tribute to Jimmy Buffett

2023-10-13T18:12:00.000-04:00

I've been a Jimmy Buffett fan since I was a teenager in the early 1990s. Two of my all-time favorite Buffett tunes are Floridays, from the 1986 album of the same name, and Brahma Fear, from his 1974 album Livin' and Dyin' in 3/4 Time.

As a musician, I realized long ago that these two songs have similar chord structures. In fact, the chord progression in the verses is identical.

The similarities led me to create a medley of these two songs, one flowing naturally into the next. I've been playing this medley on my guitar for years.

I've covered a lot of Buffett songs on my YouTube channel, but I wanted to do something special this time as a memorial. So I decided to do a piano version of the Floridays/Brahma Fear medley.

Neither of these songs is among Buffett's most well-known. You have to be a pretty dyed-in-the-wool Buffett fan to know them. So I realize a lot of people won't want to listen to 7 and a half minutes of unfamiliar cover songs. But if you're interested, here's my memorial to Jimmy.

What More Do You Want??

2023-07-02T14:25:00.000-04:00

This is an honest question - and maybe a bit of a rant - directed at modern conservatives. Seriously, what more do you want?

I hear a lot of complaining and whining from conservative family members and friends, particularly about Biden and wokeness and gun rights and Hollywood's agenda, etc. Is it just that you won't be satisfied until you've gotten EVERYTHING? Is having almost everything not enough? You won't rest until we live in a 1-party system, maintained and controlled by the GOP?

Because from where I'm sitting, we're living in a conservative golden age. You've won. You've got it all.

True, you have a Democrat in the White House, but he's a doddering old fool AND a lifelong moderate. If you think Biden is liberal, you don't have a clue what liberal is. He was literally chosen as vice-president by Obama to shore up the moderates and independents!

You own an unassailable majority on the Supreme Court thanks to 3 nominations by a corrupt 1-term ultra-conservative president. And they are decidedly an activist court, having spent the last two years systematically undoing decades of legal precedent on a variety of issues, and regularly striking down liberal- and Democratic-sponsored legislation.

You may like what they've done, but that doesn't change the fact that what they are doing is the dictionary definition of judicial activism - something I hear conservatives complain about constantly ... when it's liberal judges doing it. And it's judicial activism at the highest level.

As of this writing in 2023, you own the House of Representatives, with the Leader and the majority under the sway of an ultra-conservative caucus.

You own a majority - albeit slim - of state governors, 26 to 24. But a lot of the Democratic governors, like my own in Kentucky, are moderate like Biden, rather than hard left. Are any of the Republican governors moderate?

And then there are the state legislatures. Nebraska has a unicameral, nonpartisan legislature, so there are only 49 legislatures at issue here.

Out of around 7,000 total state lawmakers, Republicans have an 800-member advantage over Democrats. Overall, they control both chambers in 28 states, compared to only 19 states where Democrats control both chambers.

In 22 states, Republicans hold the legislature and the governor's office, compared to only 17 for the Democrats.

And finally, Republicans have veto-proof supermajorities in 20 states, compared to only 9 for the Democrats.

So again I ask, what more do you want? Isn't this enough? You've won! You've had extremely low taxes for over 30 years, and you've had a virtually unregulated free market system that has allowed you to get immeasurably richer. And that's happened because you've already moved the Democratic party into your corner on that issue - Democrats believe in low taxes and free markets as much as Republicans these days.

So I can only assume that in your conservative wet dream, you simply want a 1-party system. You want anything that you perceive as liberalism to be destroyed. You've won politics and economics, so now you're going after culture and society. You don't want debate and democracy, you want what you want, and even as you win fight after fight after fight, your appetite can't be sated. It's like you've taken your economic principle of never having enough money and applied it to politics. You can't get enough.

So tell me, what more do you want?

Dear Bengals Fans: YOU'RE WELCOME

2022-02-13T12:49:00.003-05:00

Most Bengals fans don't realize it, but I am personally responsible for the team's success this year.

Reaching the Super Bowl for the first time in 33 years is a big deal. But then again, I was personally responsible for THAT trip to the big game too.

Let me explain.

We moved to Cincinnati from Louisville in the summer of 1988. I wasn't much of a football fan, but my father and sister were, so they were excited to have a hometown team to root for. As a result, I watched a lot of football that season - something I'd never done much of before.

My Dad and I showing off our Bengals shirts
Christmas 1988

Of course, you know the story. The Bengals were good that year and made it to the Super Bowl in January of 1989. They came up 34 seconds short when Joe Montana connected with Jerry Rice in the end zone to seal the game for the 49ers.

After that big year, the Bengals never quite lived up to expectations again and I lost interest. I spent the next 33 years playfully insulting my friends who liked football and generally feeling superior to all the rubes who lived and died over it every year. I never watched another Super Bowl or even another football game all the way through.

Then came the fall of 2021. We sold our house and had to move in with in-laws while awaiting our new house to be finished. My father-in-law is a huge Bengals fan. My daughter has also, just this year, gotten into football too, thanks to her boyfriend. So watching football with the in-laws became a thing this year, and I got interested in the game for the first time since that 1988 season.

Well, again, you know the story. The Bengals have been good and have made it to the Super Bowl.

So twice in my life I've unexpectedly developed a temporary interest in football because of moving. And both those years, the Bengals have been good and have gone to the Super Bowl. And those are the ONLY two times they've gone to the Super Bowl in the last 40 years.

So, Bengals fans, YOU'RE WELCOME.

Writing for Medium

2021-08-27T19:59:00.000-04:00

I've recently started writing for an online publisher called Medium. They host both free content as well as paid content, and as a writer, you can write for both. You can also submit articles to Medium publications (ezines, essentially) and be paid if your article is accepted.

Right now, I'm only publishing free content. In order to write paid content, you have to have at least 100 followers.

I don't expect anyone to sign up for a premium subscription. But you can create a Medium account for free and follow writers. You can read as many free articles as you want; there's a monthly limit on the premium articles if you don't have a subscription.

So I would appreciate it if you'd create a free account at Medium and then follow me. You can also choose to get emailed whenever I post a new article, if you want. Here's a link to my page. When you go to that page, you'll see a red button to follow me, and a red button with an envelope on it that will let you get notified by email when I publish. When you hit the follow button, it'll prompt you to create a free account.

After that, if you never read anything I write, or ever visit Medium again, you will still have done me a favor. You'd do me even more of a favor if you actually read the articles I publish and hit the "clap" button at the bottom of them (you can actually hit it multiple times, unlike normal "like" buttons). That applause button is one of the ways their algorithms determine your engagement with your readers. And that ultimately plays into getting your stuff publicized on the site, as well as, eventually, how much you get paid.

So anyway, go to my page, click the follow button, create a free account and follow me, sign up for an email subscription if you want, then read my articles and applaud them when you're done.

Or, don't do any of those things. But it would be a big help if you did.

My Latest Piano Piece

2021-05-02T22:36:00.003-04:00

A couple of years ago, I wrote an arrangement of the song "I Dreamed a Dream," from Les Miserables. I've never actually seen the play (or movie), but who doesn't love this song? I recently finished learning it, and I think it's a pretty good arrangement. You can watch it below. And here's a link to follow my YouTube Channel.

The Derek Chauvin Trial

2021-04-09T13:01:00.002-04:00

In May of last year, I posted an article about my thoughts on the arrest of George Floyd. I made 5 points in that article:

1) Among the videos I watched of the arrest, I did not think the cops did anything to cause Floyd's death;

2) The videos I watched did not show Floyd violently resisting arrest, as I'd previously assumed;

3) He appeared to be in physical distress during the arrest;

4) He appeared drunk and may already have been in the midst of a medical emergency when cops arrived. I suggested it was probably a heart attack;

5) There's no apparent explanation for why they pinned him down for so long.

Since that post, new videos have come out, as well as the coroner's report. As it turns out, Floyd did resist arrest, refusing to remain in the car and dropping on his own to the ground several times. He kept saying he couldn't breathe even before he was pinned to the ground. He was saying it when they were trying to put him in the car. Clearly, if he already was having trouble breathing at that point, then he was, as I suggested, already in the midst of a medical emergency. From the cops' perspective, it would be easy to assume that he was just trying to get out of being arrested. Perhaps that's why they ignored similar pleas once he was on the ground.

It's also noteworthy that Floyd, himself, said he'd rather be held on the ground than held in the squad car.

The coroner ruled that he died from "cardiopulmonary arrest" secondary to police actions. He found significant blockages in Floyd's heart, but did not rule that it was a heart attack. He also found multiple drug intoxication, including meth, fentanyl, and several different strains of marijuana. Floyd was not drunk.

There is still no real explanation for why they pinned him down as long as they did. They had called for an ambulance and were awaiting its arrival, but other than that, it's not clear why they kept holding him down, even after he quit moving and talking.

Derek Chauvin - the knee on the neck guy - is currently on trial. There are three different charges the jury is considering - 2nd degree unintentional murder, 3rd degree murder, and 2nd degree manslaughter. He's not charged with 1st degree murder because that would mean he had planned to kill Floyd beforehand.

2nd degree unintentional murder means you weren't trying to kill someone, but you unintentionally killed someone while committing a felony (think of someone who robs a house, gets confronted by the homeowner, and hits them with a baseball bat; then later the victim dies).

3rd degree murder means you unintentionally killed someone while doing something inherently dangerous and without regard to other people's safety (think of someone driving 90 down the road who then hits someone and kills them).

2nd degree manslaughter is the lowest charge and essentially means you were negligent and took an unreasonable risk, resulting in someone's death (think of a doctor who performs a non-emergent surgery despite knowing the patient was unstable, and then the patient dies).

I'm not sure how they can hope to pin the first charge on him. I guess they are hoping to prove that putting his knee on the man's neck was, in fact, a felonious assault on Floyd. In my opinion, that goes way too far. He clearly wasn't attempting to assault the man ... he was subduing a person who was resisting arrest.

The 3rd degree charge is more realistic, although it has a phrase in the official language that I think would be problematic for an impartial jury. It says that the act not only has to be "imminently dangerous" and "without regard for human life," but done while also "evidencing a depraved mind."

I guess "a depraved mind" can mean different things to different people, but to me it implies that you were kind of out of your head when you did it. Like someone in a fight who, in a blind rage, shoves someone and they bang their head on the way down and die. I'm not sure you could convince me beyond a reasonable doubt that Chauvin acted "with a depraved mind" in what he did. I think he probably thought he was subduing a repeat offender who was acting erratic and resisting arrest, all the while being confronted by an increasingly angry group of bystanders.

The most reasonable charge, for me, is the second degree manslaughter. And that's primarily related to the length of time he leaned on the man's neck. Unless he can take the stand and provide some reasonable, believable, and justifiable rationale for kneeling on him for 9 minutes, including something like 3 minutes after he stopped moving and talking, then he obviously was taking an unreasonable risk, especially in light of Floyd's repeated statements that he was dying and couldn't breathe.

I think it's highly likely the jury will find him guilty of either the 3rd degree murder charge or the 2nd degree manslaughter charge. If not for the attention given the case, and the protests and everything else, I don't think prosecutors would even have charged him with the second degree murder count. I don't see how they could really hope to convince an impartial jury that Chauvin committed a felonious assault by subduing the man with his knee, regardless of how reckless it might have been.

2020 Year In Review

2020-12-31T10:45:00.001-05:00

This year sucked.

Yes, I'll Let This Come Between Us

2020-12-06T18:42:00.000-05:00

Everyone always talks about how you shouldn't let politics come between you and your friends and family. I totally agree. Politics is an important topic, and what you believe politically definitely matters. But relationships should take priority over political differences.

I've embodied this my whole life. Throughout my adulthood, most of my closest friends have held different political opinions from my own. The vast majority are registered Republicans or Independents. Off the top of my head, I can only think of one that is a blue-blood Democrat.

I believe whole-heartedly that the Trump administration represents an unprecedented danger to American society and politics. Because of that, I would certainly not seek out a new relationship with someone I knew was an ardent Trump supporter. But I would not, and have not, let support for Trump get in between me and any of my existing relationships. Thankfully, I don't have very many Trump-supporting friends and family (but I do have a few!).

Be that as it may, I've finally found something that I will, in fact, let interfere in my relationships. And that's the pandemic. Like everything else in this deeply fractured country, the pandemic has been politicized. But it's not political. It's about science and medicine. It's about the health and well-being of society.

We can differ on whether shut-downs are effective, or about the balancing of physical health against mental and economic health. Those are legitimate debates. But what's not debatable is the seriousness of this disease, or wearing a mask when you're in public.

Having now spent 9 months (and counting) working the front lines of this pandemic, I have seen what this disease can do. I've seen people die. I've seen people sicker than they've ever been in their lives. I've witnessed the long-term effects on the heart and lungs. I've seen people on ventilators for weeks, turned face-down in their hospital bed as part of a therapeutic, gravity-based protocol. I've seen an ER overrun with Covid-positive patients who are short of breath and having chest pain.

If you refuse to acknowledge the severity of this disease; if you act like this disease is just another flu; if you refuse to wear a mask in public; if you support retailers and restaurants that flaunt mandates; if you argue that this is all just unnecessary hysterics...

If you do and say these things, then no, we can't be friends. Yes, I will let this come between us.

This is a deal-breaker.

Clair de Lune

2020-12-02T19:01:00.001-05:00

Two of the most famous classical piano pieces are named after the moon. Moonlight Sonata by Beethoven was one of the first classical pieces I ever learned, back in high school. The other is Clair de Lune by Debussy, which literally means Moonlight. Beethoven didn't name his piece - he called it "Sonata Quasi Una Fantasia" - meaning simply "Sonata almost like a fantasy." (A fantasy was a type of semi-improvisational solo piano piece.)

Debussy, on the other hand, did name his piece Clair de Lune, although that wasn't his original name for it. Written early in his career, around 1890, he originally called it Promenade Sentimentale - "A sentimental walk." It was the third movement of a 4-movement piece. But he didn't publish it at the time.

Fifteen years later, in 1905, a publisher convinced him to publish it. He agreed, but only after making significant changes to the music. He also decided to rename the third movement Clair de Lune, after a poem that he liked.

I can remember my Dad playing the opening of Clair de Lune when I was a kid. He'd learned it when HE was a kid, and still remembered the first few bars. He did the same thing with Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata. It was his tinkering with Moonlight Sonata that first inspired me to learn that piece when I was a teenager. But I never played Clair de Lune back then.

So this year, I decided to learn Dad's old favorite. I don't think he ever learned the difficult middle part, so I've managed to outdo him on this one. (I outdid him on Moonlight Sonata too, learning the more difficult second and third movements, as well as the first.)

Two New Songs

2020-11-07T17:50:00.002-05:00

My uncle is an old Buddy Holly fan, and he asked me to do a Buddy Holly song. I decided to do Oh Boy, because it's always been my favorite Holly tune.

When I was in high school, M and I spent a lot of time talking on the phone. For some bizarre reason, her phone picked up a local oldies radio station. Anytime she was on her bedroom phone, you could hear the oldies station in the background. So old 1950s rock n' roll hits were frequently the background music to our hours-long conversations in high school. Oh Boy was played frequently and I loved the background vocals - they were so emblematic to me of 50s pop music.

Anyway, this is my rendition of Oh Boy (without any backing vocals of course). I created the backing track online by writing out the drum and bass lines and then playing it in the background as I played and sang guitar live.

And the next song is Goodbye, by Elton John. This is the last track on his 1971 Madman Across the Water album. I have no idea what it's about - like a lot of his songs from the early 70s, it doesn't really make any sense. But I love its melancholy beauty.

Fixing Our Political Party Problem

2020-11-05T18:09:00.003-05:00

As of this writing, the 2020 election still hangs in the balance two days after Election Day as states finish counting ballots. In the interim, I've been thinking about how we could solve our little problem of massive, widespread political unrest and division.

The first step, of course, would be to have a normal, non-divisive human being in the White House, someone who actually seeks to unite rather than divide. But that's not actually what I want to talk about.

Instead, I want to talk about fixing our existing political parties. There are a million things that should happen - chief among them would be extensive changes to campaign finance, including a complete ban on television, internet, and print advertising. I would also argue that campaigns should be 100% publicly-funded - no private donations, and definitely no Super PACs.

But as for the parties themselves, they should be each be split in two. Mainstream Republicans get hurt in elections by their association with right wing extremists. Similarly for mainstream Democrats.

Biden's failure to secure a resounding victory on Election Day was partly due to the Trump campaign successfully tying him to the left wing and its outrages. For instance, many reports have argued that Biden lost numerous Cuban and Venezuelan voters in Florida because attack ads painted him in league with socialists and communists - something that is very close to those particular voters' hearts.

This could be avoided by splitting the parties. The left wing should break away from the Democratic Party and form its own organization. AOC or some other firebrand could be its leader. Similarly with Trump and his right wing supporters. That would then leave the traditional Democratic and Republican parties to the moderates who don't want to be associated with the fringe.

Obviously, in Congress, the left wing party would largely vote with the Democrats, and the right wing party with the Republicans, but in major elections, Democrats and Republicans wouldn't have to suffer because of the outrages of their extreme elements. It would be much harder for an attack ad to tie Biden to AOC and socialism if all those socialists weren't actually members of, and influencers of, the Democratic Party. The same would be true for Republicans.

Four parties would, of course, solve one set of problems only to create different ones. What happens when the candidate is a Democrat and the left wing party refuses to support him/her? Conservatives then run away with the election. Beyond that, it could create headaches in Congress.

But I can't personally see how more parties would be a bad thing for American democracy. I've argued elsewhere that the U.S. is the only major democratic country on earth with only two political parties, and that's despite having the third highest population. Canada has 5 parties currently represented in its legislature, despite having only a fraction of the U.S. population. India literally has dozens.

So when I become king of America, this is the first change I'm going to make. The second will be to ban guns. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

Quitting Social Media

2020-10-21T00:06:00.001-04:00

So, I wrote a seven- or eight-paragraph post about why I'm quitting social media, but I just deleted it all.

Rather than ramble about how social media is destroying society and how I don't want to be part of that anymore, I'm just going to say that I'm getting off social media after the election. I don't know yet if I'm going to delete my accounts, or just log out and remove the apps from my phone. But my intention is for this to be a permanent state of affairs.

Some of you know that I keep a Twitter account called Scenes of the Bluegrass where I post pictures of Kentucky that people submit to me. It has about 8,000 followers. I will probably keep running that account.

I will continue to update this blog with occasional posts, and I intend to keep my YouTube channel where I post my music. You can follow me there if you're interested in seeing my videos. You can also sign up to get my new blog posts by email. It's right there on the right side of this screen under SUBSCRIBE VIA EMAIL.

Washington's Nightmare Comes To Life

2020-09-24T18:57:00.000-04:00

So I wrote a book on the history of American political parties a few years ago called Washington's Nightmare - so-named because at the end of his presidency, George Washington warned Americans about forming and supporting political parties. He called political coalitions "truly our worst enemy" and noted that they represented a "frightful despotism."

I think it's fair to say we're currently living Washington's nightmare in real-time, every day.

More relevant now than ever, if you haven't picked up a copy of my book, maybe now is the time to do it. It's a brief survey of the history of party politics in America, covering all the major parties that have come and gone throughout American history. It includes chronological looks at the Democratic and Republican parties and how they have changed through the years.

You can buy Washington's Nightmare here. It's available in both Kindle e-book and paperback formats. If you like podcasts, I also wrote a six-part series based on the book for American History Tellers and Wondery. They're currently (as of Fall 2020) re-airing the series, which originally ran in 2018.

George Floyd's Arrest and Cause of Death

2020-05-29T12:48:00.000-04:00

Sometimes during slow nights at work, I like to pass the time by watching YouTube videos. One type of video I like watching are police-related vids - high speed chases, dash cam videos, officer involved shootings, etc. It's like watching a cop show, but for realzies.

Anyway, I've watched hundreds of videos of officers arresting people, getting involved in shoot-outs and foot chases, perps resisting arrest, etc.

So my first thought on seeing the video of George Floyd was that he probably violently resisted arrest, so the cops were holding him down firmly. Cops do this all the time with violent offenders. Since he was talking, it was clear that the knee on his neck wasn't actually choking him, despite that being the widely-accepted narrative. This is also something that suspects do all the time - resist arrest, then cry and complain when the cops take them to the ground. I typically don't have a lot of sympathy in those cases (of course, normally, they aren't actually dying).

But there are more videos out there of the Floyd arrest that give a bit more context than the one that has been most widely circulated (the one with the knee on the neck). These include surveillance videos and another cell phone video, both of which actually show part of the initial arrest.

So here are my thoughts after watching all these videos, and applying what I know from working in hospitals and from watching lots of these kinds of videos.

1) There's nothing in any of these videos to suggest that Floyd died because of anything the cops did. Pressing a knee to the back of someone's neck doesn't choke them. And the fact that he was speaking proves beyond any reasonable doubt that he could breathe.

2) The arrest videos show that he was not violently resisting arrest, as I had initially assumed. However, he does appear to be giving trouble to the officers, because it takes two of them to get him out of the car and handcuff him. It's impossible from the videos to say why or what kind of trouble he was giving them. But it wasn't a simple arrest situation.

3) He appears to already be in some kind of physical distress while being arrested. This may be why he was giving them trouble. After handcuffing him, he staggers to the sidewalk before collapsing against a wall for several minutes while a cop talks to him. Then the cop helps him to his feet and escorts him across the street to his squad car. There, he collapses a second time and multiple cops help lift him and take him around to the other side. Once there, he collapses for the third and final time. Unfortunately, you can't see on the videos what happens after that. The next video available shows him with the knee already in his neck. Perhaps body worn cameras will clear that up, but none have been released yet.

4) Initial reports said cops thought he was drunk. Based on the arrest videos, I can see why. Instead of being drunk (or maybe in addition to being drunk), he was probably already having whatever medical emergency caused his death. Based on his age and size, he may have been having a heart attack. He may have already been in the middle of it before the arrest even started.

5) None of this explains why the cops were pinning him down or why the one cop kept his knee on the man's neck for so long. Again, hopefully body cams can clear that up. What's clear is that they shouldn't have laid on top of him as long as they did. The cop with the knee almost seems to be defying the crowd. You get the impression he didn't want to look weak by moving after they demanded it, so he just stayed in place for no good reason. Despite that, I don't believe his knee caused Mr. Floyd's death. There's certainly nothing in the available videos to suggest that.

An inability on the part of the public for calm, rational analysis of things like this is why we have riots and looting afterward. And unfortunately, the press, politicians, voices on social media - all these people make matters worse by instantly starting a bandwagon on one side or the other, and everyone seems to just fall in line. In the end, people like me are left wondering if anyone on either side of the political aisle has the ability to think sensibly or impartially anymore.

A Lesson from Fred Flintstone

2020-05-04T15:00:00.001-04:00

When I was a kid, I LOVED cartoons. I would wake up at 6:30 on Saturday morning JUST to watch cartoons. In fact, my whole Saturday morning was arranged around a strict cartoon schedule that ran from 7 to 11 and culminated with a glorious 90-minute binge of the Smurfs.

During the mid-1980s, TBS aired old Flintstones reruns in the afternoon. My daily routine during those years was to get home, get a snack (usually microwaved hot dogs), and head in to the family room to watch the Flintstones - two thirty minute episodes (that is, unless a Cubs game was on WGN, in which case I chose baseball over cartoons).

I can say with fair certainty that I've seen every Flintstones episode multiple times.

There's one in particular that I am constantly reminded of these days. In this episode, Pebbles has recently been born to Fred and Wilma. Fred, being a doting father, has fallen head over heels for his new baby. Intent on documenting her childhood, he immediately runs out to a store and buys a fancy new video camera.

He proceeds to become obsessive about making home movies and showing them to everyone he can find. At first, it's all great. Barney and Betty and the others really enjoy coming over, hanging out with Fred and Wilma, and watching videos of cute little Pebbles.

But, as usual, Fred doesn't know when to stop. The behavior continues, day in and day out. Barney and Betty begin to grow fed up with the non-stop barrage of Pebbles vids, even as Fred's obsession grows stronger. They begin avoiding him to keep from getting corralled into another home movie session.

Then Fred really goes overboard and secretly plans to show Pebbles videos to all the members of the Water Buffalo Lodge. Telling them it's a "bathing beauty" video, the lodgers are naturally put out when it turns out to be videos of Pebbles in her baby pool.

More zany cartoon drama ensues, before Fred finally learns his lesson and hangs up his video camera for good.

Believe it or not, there is a point to retelling this plot from a 1960s cartoon. You probably already have an idea of where I'm going. I am constantly reminded of this episode by certain people on social media who don't seem to realize that no one wants to see a constant barrage of pictures of their kids/daily lives/vacations/dinners, etc. If the writers of this episode could see where society has gone, they'd turn over in their graves. We've got 100 million Fred Flintstones running around the country now, posting every photo and video in their camera roll to Instagram and Facebook.

I'm obviously not gonna name names, but I've got several followers on Instagram who I swear to God post dozens of pictures of their kids every week. One of these people is worse than all the others. Since Friday, she has made 15 posts on Instagram (as of this hour), with a total of 29 pictures and 1 video. Among these are 3 pictures of wine glasses, two pictures of legs laying out in the sun, pictures of fire pits and backyard pools, and two dozen pictures of her kids and husband.

This is pretty much a normal three-day stretch for her. Not everyone is quite that bad, of course, but several others come pretty close. I've got one follower who I swear must post every picture in her camera roll when she goes on vacation. Each day it will be multiple posts of dozens of photos, including some that aren't even good pictures. It's obvious she's just going through her camera roll picture by picture and posting them all, so that we can enjoy her Disney or beach trip right alongside her.

What, precisely, is going on in the minds of these Fred Flintstone wannabes? Why do they think their hundreds of Instagram contacts want to see ALL of those pictures? I get that maybe your mom might want to see the pics of her grandchildren, or your best girlfriend might want to see what you did on vacation. But you've got 700 followers! Why IN THE WORLD would you post all these pictures or think that ANYBODY wanted to see them?

I realize the answer here is to just unfollow them. Like Barney and Betty, avoidance is the key. But these are friends and acquaintances of mine, and I like to see SOME pictures of them. I mean, that's why we follow people on Instagram in the first place, right?

I guess I see this sort of thing as breaking the unwritten rules of society. Like Fred, who couldn't see that no one was as interested in his own kid and his own life as he was, some people just don't seem to realize that they and their kids aren't the center of everyone else's lives. Yes, there's such a thing as too much.

Elegy for the Victims of the Pandemic

2020-03-30T00:16:00.002-04:00

I never intended, planned, or expected to be working on the front lines of a global pandemic. If you had told 25-year-old Scott that he'd be doing this at age 45, he'd have probably fainted.

But the winding, hilly, curvy, tortuous path I've followed in life has led me to be in this place, at this time. I am an X-ray tech at a hospital in downtown Cincinnati. I work at night and spend the vast majority of my 12-hour shifts X-raying patients in the Emergency Room and on the various floor units of the hospital.

My hospital has spent the last few weeks preparing for a surge of COVID-19 patients. They've placed zippered, air-tight curtains over all the ED rooms that don't have doors; they've cleared out a whole wing to accommodate COVID-19 patients; they've banned all visitors from the hospital; and they have ceased all elective procedures and surgeries. We've seen a steady increase over the last week or two in patients with respiratory symptoms and expect the numbers to continue to increase.

As my friends and family know all too well, my religious beliefs these days wax and wane depending on my mood. As this blog testifies, I have long ago given up the traditional beliefs of my youth. But in these last few weeks, I've found myself continually thinking of the countless sermons and Sunday School lessons I heard growing up about great biblical characters who were faced with circumstances they didn't exactly ask for.

I think of Abraham and the famous story of God asking him to sacrifice his son Isaac, only to stop him at the last second after Abraham proved his faithfulness. I think of David, the shepherd boy, facing off with Goliath, the warrior champion of the Philistines. And I think of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, begging God not to make him "drink this cup."

I don't want to drink this cup. I don't want to be on the front lines of a global pandemic. But this is where my life's path has brought me. I don't normally talk about things like this, but I have always felt that I was built/made/designed for something important. Maybe that's just my white, privileged, upper middle class, male ego talking. But it's how I've always felt.

To use words I might have used in my youth but wouldn't normally dream of using now ... being on the front line of this pandemic is what God has called me to do, whether I like it or not. I'm here, and I have to do it. It's important. And I'm made for important work.

I realize that, as an X-ray tech, I'm not exactly saving lives or even risking my own health as much as others. Nurses, doctors, and respiratory therapists are putting themselves at far greater risks than I am, if for no other reason than because they spend more time with the patients than I do. But I'm part of the team that is fighting this battle, and I've accepted the cup that I've been given. I intend to do the best job I can with it.

All of this is sort of a long introduction to a piano piece that I have written to honor and remember those who have lost their lives in this pandemic. I originally intended to write a really sad lament, but it turned out a little different than I expected. Though I began it in a minor key, I very quickly transitioned into the relative major. Those of you who aren't musicians won't understand what I mean by that, but minor keys are usually associated with sad or dark music, while major keys are typically associated with happy or upbeat music.

Writing a sad song in a minor key is easy. It's been done a million times. But I've always appreciated and enjoyed sad songs written in major keys, because it's harder and less common. Maybe you'll think this song is sad, and maybe you won't. But whether it's sad or not, it's my tribute to those who have lost their lives in this pandemic - a pandemic that I have been called to risk my health and devote my services to.

Ranking Elton John Albums - Part 1, Nos. 31 through 21

2019-11-05T20:47:00.001-05:00

I've been an Elton John fan for just about as long as I can remember. From the age of 9 or 10, I began listening to my own music and generally gravitated towards guitar-driven rock (Van Halen, Dire Straits, eventually Guns n' Roses, etc.). But before all of that, there was Elton John.

His first Greatest Hits album, from 1974, was basically a family playlist. I guess my earliest family music memories are of Amy Grant and other Christian singers, but once my parents decided it was okay to introduce their precious children to secular devil music, it was basically Elton John, and maybe some Alabama.

On vacations and other long trips, this album would also get played through a least a couple of times. I knew all the songs on it by heart. As I got older, more compilations were put out and I eventually had his Greatest Hits volumes 1, 2, and 3.

For a long time those were the only Elton John albums I had, and the songs on those albums were basically the only Elton John songs I knew. Then, in college, I got a book with note-for-note transcripts of a bunch of Elton John songs. Many of them were songs I wasn't familiar with. There was one in particular - Indian Sunset - that I really enjoyed playing and I was dying to hear the real, actual song. (Children, this was back before Al Gore invented the Internet.)

So I figured out which album that song was on (it was Madman Across the Water) and I bought the CD. I ended up liking every song on the album, which didn't surprise me, since I'd always liked every other Elton John song I'd ever heard.

Still, after that, I never bought another Elton John album. Up until a few years ago, I was okay with only knowing the same 35 or so songs I'd had on my greatest hits albums and my one studio album.

But then I got a subscription to Amazon Music and discovered they had every single one of his past albums available. So I created a playlist with 372 songs on it. I've been listening to it very regularly now for the past few years.

And now I've decided I'm qualified to make a list ranking his albums from worst to best.

I am ranking the 31 studio albums that Elton John has released as of 2019. I have not included any live albums, compilations, or collaboration albums he's done with other people. I also am not including the five or six movie soundtracks he's done over the years. These are just the 31 solo studio albums that he has put out since 1969.

I didn't actually intend for this introduction to be so long, but hey, shit happens. Anyway, here's the first part of the list. Let me know what you think, although be aware that if you disagree, you'll be wrong.

--------------------------------------------------------

31. VICTIM OF LOVE

If you've ever heard this album, then you are like me: a victim of Victim of Love. This is a no-brainer. I can't imagine a ranking of Elton John studio albums that didn't put this album as the very worst. It's not just Elton's worst album, it has to be one of the worst albums that's ever been recorded by a major act. It's remarkably bad. It is absolutely unbelievable that a star of Elton's caliber agreed to do an album this awful.

Here's the thing: It's a freaking disco album. The first song is an 8-minute disco version of Johnny B. Goode, if you want an idea of how awful it is. I think all the other songs are originals, but they are just terrible. And it's not just because disco is terrible. Even by disco standards, these songs suck. I guess if you were high as a kite in orange bell bottoms on a disco dance floor in Germany in 1979, maybe it would've been fine, but I can't imagine any other setting where this album isn't just fucking terrible.

I don't know the background of the album, but it seems to have been a record company gimmick to cash in on the disco fad of the late 70s. Released in 1979, Elton basically only participated by singing the songs. He didn't write any of the music or play keyboards (or any other instrument) on any of the songs. And he's never performed any of them live. The record company seems to have wanted something, Elton was too fucked up on coke to produce anything, so they brought in studio musicians and songwriters to write and record a disco album, and then just brought Elton in to sing the lyrics and put his name on the cover. That's what it appears to be, anyway.

Regardless, it's terrible. I skip the songs when they come on.

30. THE THOM BELL SESSIONS

I haven't seen the Elton biopic, so I don't know if it addresses this, but the late 70s seem to have been a bad time in Elton's life. This is another terrible album from that time.

Thom Bell was a famous producer who had developed a sound called Philadelphia Soul. Elton had written a stand-alone single called Philadelphia Freedom in 1975 that tapped into this sound. After that, he apparently wanted to work with Bell for a whole album. Evidently the two didn't get along well and they ended up only recording 6 songs before calling it quits. Even though the recording sessions took place in 1977, the album wasn't released until 1979, and then it was only a 3-song EP. One of those songs (Mama Can't Buy You Love) did end up going to #9 on the charts.

In 1989, the album was re-released, this time with all 6 songs.

With the exception of Mama Can't Buy You Love (which is a decent song), both incarnations of this album suck. Maybe if I was into 1970s Philadelphia Soul music, I would like it. But I'm not. The background music is heavy on brassy orchestration and apparently one of the gimmicks of this sound is to repeat a catchy chorus about 435 times at the end of the song. I mean these songs just go on and on and on, and it's not NEW music, it's the same hook, over and over and over again. If you're familiar with Mama Can't Buy You Love, you'll know what I'm talking about.

With the exception of Mama, I skip all these songs when they come on.

29. WONDERFUL CRAZY NIGHT

This is Elton's most recent album, released in 2016. It was a tough decision to put it here, because there are no "bad" songs on it. And I don't want to be one of those "all his new music sucks" guys.

But the problem is that there are no really good songs on it. It's basically just 10 very average, forgettable tracks. A few of the songs have a catchy beat or a catchy hook, but all in all the music is just not great. It feels very much like what it is ... an album by a 70-year-old former pop/rock star who has long since graduated into the low end of the Adult Contemporary arena.

I also can't stand the cover of this album. In my opinion, Elton John is remarkably bad at album covers. He's got some really, really awful ones in his catalogue. This is one of them. The expression on his face and his body language on the cover reminds me disturbingly of my mother-in-law. And the music can probably also be described as Music Your Mother-In-Law Would Like.

28. ICE ON FIRE

This album is from 1985 and it's like he wasn't even trying at this point. There is one gem on this album in the song Nikita, but that's about it. Wrap Her Up is catchy, but it's ultimately just bubble-gum pop by two gay guys (George Michael sings back-up) pretending to be straight.

And besides those two songs, the others are all "meh." Some are basically skippers, but even those you don't skip are basically songs you never need to hear again.

27. A SINGLE MAN

Back to that bad period in the late 70s again, and another album that's just not that good. This was the second album Elton did after "breaking up" with his longtime writing partner, Bernie Taupin. The first was the aforementioned Thom Bell Sessions and the third was Victim of Love. This one, at least, was a straightforward studio album with Elton writing the songs and performing them, albeit with a different lyricist.

I put this album above Ice on Fire simply because A Single Man has the song Georgia on it. I absolutely love this song. It's probably in my top 10. Elton had made his fame playing a style of music I like to call piano-driven Gospel Rock, and in the late 70s, he moved away from that sound, pretty much permanently. But Georgia was like one last hurrah of that classic Elton, piano-driven Gospel Rock sound. I just love this song.

There are a few other decent songs to be found here, but all in all it's not a good album. Elton just wasn't the same during the 5 or 6 years that he and Bernie Taupin weren't writing together.

As a bit of trivia, Elton frequently recorded songs during his recording sessions that didn't make the final cut for the album. They were sometimes used as "B-sides" for singles, and other times just stuck into the vault unreleased. Years later, they would frequently make it onto compilation albums of "rare" songs or included with re-releases of the studio albums they were recorded with.

One of those songs for this album was called Flintstone Boy. It was originally the B-side to a single. It's now included on the reissue of A Single Man. It's the only song I know of where Elton John wrote the music and the lyrics. Elton is famous for his playing and songwriting, but lyrics are not his forte, which is why he's always used a lyricist to write with him.

I guess maybe in the wake of breaking up with Bernie Taupin he decided to try his hand at writing some lyrics. The result is this song. And it is absolutely awful. It seriously must be the most inane, asinine set of lyrics I have ever heard. And I guess because the lyrics were so uninspiring, the music he wrote for them was also pretty terrible. It's just a bad song. Definitely a skipper.

26. THE ONE

This is an album from 1992. It reminds me a bit of Wonderful Crazy Night in that it doesn't have any bad songs, but it also doesn't have anything really all that great on it. I need an album to have at least a few gems, and this one doesn't deliver. The songs are all okay, but there's just nothing here that I would ever intentionally go and play. The title track was a top 10 hit and it's probably the best song on the album.

25. THE DIVING BOARD

This is another recent album, having been put out in 2013. If you like albums that sound like basic jazzy piano bar music, then this is an album for you. As a pianist, I like the piano-driven aspects of the album, which includes 3 brief piano solo instrumentals scattered among the regular songs (called Dream #1, Dream #2, and Dream #3).

The Ballad of Blind Tom is a good one that tells the story of a real-life pianist in the late 19th century. He was a black man born into slavery who was a blind piano prodigy. He could also apparently mimic any voice he ever heard and repeat long speeches and soliloquies from memory. He was diagnosed as mentally handicapped during his life, but he was likely an autistic savant. Someone could play him a song he'd never heard before, and he could immediately play it back to them, note-for-note.

If there's any problem with this album, it's just that it's a little too piano-lounge for me. You need to have a glass of brandy, a book of philosophy, and a tweed jacket on when you listen to this album.

24. THE FOX

We're beginning now to reach the stage where the albums are more good than bad. This album comes from 1981 and Elton had begun to write with Bernie Taupin again, although Taupin only wrote the lyrics for about half the songs.

Just Like Belgium is probably the best song on this album. There aren't any bad songs here, although a couple of them are just sort of boring. Carla/Etude/Fanfare are three songs that all run together on the original B side of the album, comprising about 6 minutes of instrumental music. Why there are three different titles to what is basically a single 6-minute instrumental is anyone's guess. The music then runs directly into the next track, called Chloe, which is the only one of the four that actually has lyrics.

But all in all, this is a decent record with some good hooks and laid back grooves that make for a decent 80s soft rock album.

23. EMPTY SKY

This was Elton John's first album, released in the UK in 1969. It was not released in the U.S. at the time, which is why his second, self-title album, is frequently named as his "first" album. Empty Sky didn't get released until 1975 in the U.S., at the height of his fame.

This album's main strengths lie in its hints of the greatness that was to come, and in its novelty value. If you're familiar with "classic" Elton John, you notice immediate differences when you listen to this album. His voice sounds different, and many of the songs have a very 60s, psychedelic sound to them. He bizarrely opted to play harpsichord instead of piano on a number of the songs, which gives them a very foreign, artsy kind of feel.

The best song on the album actually wasn't even on the original album released in 1969. It's Me That You Need was one of several singles released independently at that time. The song has since been included on reissues of the album.

Another song from the album, Skyline Pigeon, is easily one Elton's best songs, but not the early version found on Empty Sky. On this version, he plays harpsichord, and it totally ruins the song. A few years later had the sense to re-record and re-release it, and that second version is one of my favorite Elton John songs.

22. TOO LOW FOR ZERO

This is actually Elton's best-selling album of the 1980s, but as a whole, I think it's actually among his worst. But that doesn't mean it's a bad album.

To begin with, it has I Guess That's Why They Call It The Blues on it, and that's one of his best songs (maybe his very best song) of the 1980s. It also produced several other hits that are decent, including I'm Still Standing, Kiss the Bride, and the title track. Kiss the Bride is another one of those bubble-gum pop songs that Elton did so well in the 80s and which sound funny today because OF COURSE he didn't want to kiss the bride.

In any case, the reason this album is lower than most of his other 80s albums is because besides those hits, the rest of the songs on the album are pretty weak. A set of pretty much forgettable songs.

21. THE BIG PICTURE

According to the Wikipedia article, lyricist Bernie Taupin lists this album as his least favorite, because he apparently thinks his lyrics weren't very good. Considering how bizarre and sometimes even silly his lyrics can be, I don't necessarily understand what his problem with this particular album is.

In any case, this album is from 1997 and its very heavy on orchestration. Some of the songs give a sense of elevator music. It's definitely strongly in the Adult Contemporary camp. But over time, this album has grown on me.

A lot of the songs are very dramatic and theatrical (he wrote a number of movie soundtracks in the 90s, including The Lion King and several others, so he must have just been in that mode when he went into the studio to do this one). If you let yourself, you can kind of get swept away in the drama of a few of the songs, with their big, sweeping orchestrations and their booming climaxes.

Something About the Way You Look Tonight is probably the last truly great song Elton John wrote. It got a lot of attention and airplay because it was the B-side to his standalone single Candle in the Wind 1997, the tribute to Princess Diana, which is to this day the best-selling single of all time.

--------------------------------------------------------

Keep watching for my next post, which will continue the countdown from 20 to 11. We're going to start getting into some really, really good Elton John albums.

Bohemian Rhapsody

2019-11-03T12:31:00.001-05:00

So in the early spring, I bought a book of Queen songs arranged for piano. I started learning Bohemian Rhapsody and very quickly decided the arrangement was lacking. So I decided to make my own arrangement.

Between the time I took creating the arrangement and the time it took me to learn it, I've been working on this piece for most of the year.

I finally got a version of it recorded that is at least halfway decent.

Here it is.

Christmas Music Playlist

2019-10-29T22:45:00.000-04:00

I know it's early in the season for this, but I figured I would announce this now. I've spent the fall arranging a set of my favorite Christmas songs for piano. And I've recorded those songs and put them into a playlist on YouTube that anyone can access.

So this Christmas, if you're looking for traditional Christmas music, and you like piano music, you can put this playlist on in the background. Also, just in case anyone is interested, you can also buy the sheet music for any of these arrangements by CLICKING HERE.

The YouTube playlist is HERE.

Here's one of the videos from the playlist, to give you a taste:

Notes from the Cave

2019-10-09T16:28:00.001-04:00

Thank you to everyone who responded to my last blog post. I didn't respond individually to anyone, but I read all your responses and appreciate them.

I've decided to keep the blog going. With 13 years of posts, some of which I am still pretty proud of, there's not really any good reason to delete the blog. Even if I wasn't going to update it anymore, I probably wouldn't delete the blog outright.

But I think I probably will continue to post now and then. I think one of the main reasons why my production has waned so much is because I'm writing podcast scripts now on a regular basis and have very little time to do things like blogging. Also, my writing fix gets satisfied by the script writing, so I don't necessary "need" to blog.

Anyway, speaking of podcast scripts, in my last Notes from the Cave in February, I promised to keep you abreast of what was going on with all that. I failed in that promise, although I still like saying the word "abreast."

I did start writing for the new podcast company in the early spring. They are called Parcast and they were actually bought by Spotify not long after I started writing for them. They have about 15 or 20 weekly scripted podcasts that they produce. I signed a contract with them and wrote two shows for them. The first was for a podcast called Assassinations and it was a 2-episode series on the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which set off World War I.

The second was another 2-episode series for a show called Kingpins. It was about a marijuana smuggling operation in the Miami in the 1970s.

After that, I signed a new contract with Parcast (for more money, yay!) to write 10 more episodes. I am currently working on the 5th episode in that contract. The first was a 2-episode series for the show Cults about a Satanic cult in Massachusetts in the late 70s that was implicated in a string of prostitute murders. (I wasn't allowed to actually use the word "prostitute" in these scripts where all the characters were pimps and prostitutes. "Prostitute" is not PC, apparently. You have to call them "sex workers." #Hollywood, amiright?)

Then I wrote two stand-alone episodes for a show called Historical Figures. Neither of these has come out yet, so I'll refrain from giving away the subject matter. Both were people I had never heard of before beginning my research.

I'm currently working on another stand-along episode for a show called Gone, which discusses people and objects that have disappeared. I'm going to be writing two stand-alone episodes for this show as well.

The remaining four scripts in the contract have not been assigned yet, so I don't know what they'll be about.

Switching gears, let's talk about music. I'm still practicing the piano on a regular basis, about 4-5 days per week. I'm currently working on 4 songs, 3 of which are ALMOST finished. (Finished, for me, means a relatively clean take recorded on video.) Those three songs are the third movement of Beethoven's Pathetique Sonata (once learned, this will make 2 complete Beethoven sonatas that I have learned), a fantasia by Mozart, and my own arrangement of the Queen song Bohemian Rhapsody (you're REALLY gonna like that one). The fourth song that still needs some work is my own original classical-style composition called Rondo in A Minor: The Midnight Hour.

As for my composing, I have recently been putting a lot of time into arranging Christmas songs for solo piano. This is something I've been wanting to do since I first started playing again in 2016, but every year it gets to be Christmas time and I realize I've failed to do it. So this year, I started in September arranging Christmas songs. I'm about 75% done with the 19 songs that I've chosen to make arrangements for.

I'm not sure that I'll ever learn every single one of them, although that will remain to be seen. I wish I was good enough to be able to just sight-read all of them. Some of them are easy enough that I can almost do that. But regardless, the software I use will play back anything you write, with electronic versions of the instruments. And in this day and age, the software playback is pretty damn realistic. So after I'm done arranging this set of songs, I'm going to record the playback and then upload each song to YouTube. Then I'll put them all in a Christmas playlist that anyone can access if they want to turn on some solo piano music for Christmas this year. I'll post a link once it's done.

I should point out that the songs I've chosen are all traditional Christmas songs - I'm not a big fan of modern Christmas music, so don't expect any Mariah Carey or Amy Grant Christmas songs. Instead of Josh Groban, think Bing Crosby or Andy Williams.

If you are interested in listening to my compositions, both original compositions as well as numerous arrangements I've done, you can click here and hear them all. The one caveat is that you do have to create an account. But that's free to do. I have piano pieces as well as chamber music (small ensembles) and full orchestral works. I currently have about 70 public pieces. You can also buy some of my sheet music here.

Anyway, thanks as always for reading (and listening!).