<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sexual Harassment » Employment Law Information Network</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.elinfonet.com/category/federal/sexual-harassment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.elinfonet.com</link>
	<description>All Things Labor and Employment Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 13:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Third-Party Harassment Claims</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/third-party-harassment-claims/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaw Law Group, PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 23:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Harassment By Non-Employees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=172409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Most employers understand their obligation to address harassment by supervisors and coworkers. Fewer appreciate the risk posed by people who do not work for the organization at all, including customers, vendors, contractors, patients, clients, and</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/third-party-harassment-claims/">Third-Party Harassment Claims</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale of Two Standards: Supreme Court Lets Conflicting Rules on Third-Party Harassment Stand</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/a-tale-of-two-standards-supreme-court-lets-conflicting-rules-on-third-party-harassment-stand/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Harassment By Non-Employees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=168075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of the United States recently denied certiorari in Bivens v. Zep, Inc., leaving in place a stark circuit split on the standard for employer liability when customers or other third parties harass employees.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/a-tale-of-two-standards-supreme-court-lets-conflicting-rules-on-third-party-harassment-stand/">A Tale of Two Standards: Supreme Court Lets Conflicting Rules on Third-Party Harassment Stand</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defensible Decisions: Leaning Into the Law After EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance (Podcast)</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/defensible-decisions-leaning-into-the-law-after-eeoc-rescinds-anti-harassment-guidance-podcast/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=162161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of our Defensible Decisions podcast, Scott Kelly (shareholder, Birmingham) and Nonnie Shivers (office managing shareholder, Phoenix) discuss the EEOC’s January 2025 vote to rescind the Biden-era anti-harassment guidance, which had addressed gender identity issues including pronouns, bathroom access, and misgendering. Scott, who is chair of the firm’s</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/defensible-decisions-leaning-into-the-law-after-eeoc-rescinds-anti-harassment-guidance-podcast/">Defensible Decisions: Leaning Into the Law After EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance (Podcast)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>EntertainHR: St. Denis Medical—Taking ‘Love Contracts’ to the Next Level </title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/entertainhr-st-denis-medical-taking-love-contracts-to-the-next-level/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Workplace Romance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=162038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Following in the workplace comedy mockumentary footsteps of shows like The Office and Superstore, St. Denis Medical focuses on the staff of an Oregon hospital as they navigate the stress of medical emergencies amidst the often absurd details of their personal and professional relationships.  This all-star ensemble cast includes the hilarious Wendi McLendon-Covey as Joyce, the hospital</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/entertainhr-st-denis-medical-taking-love-contracts-to-the-next-level/">EntertainHR: St. Denis Medical—Taking ‘Love Contracts’ to the Next Level </a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sixth Circuit Finds Sexual Harassment Claim Can Bar Entire Case From Arbitration</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/sixth-circuit-finds-sexual-harassment-claim-can-bar-entire-case-from-arbitration/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=161186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On February 25, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Bruce v. Adams and Reese, LLP that employers cannot compel arbitration of a case under a mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreement when an employee or former employee sues on multiple claims and at least one of</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/sixth-circuit-finds-sexual-harassment-claim-can-bar-entire-case-from-arbitration/">Sixth Circuit Finds Sexual Harassment Claim Can Bar Entire Case From Arbitration</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Littler: What can we do (legally!) about broken hearts in the workplace?</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/dear-littler-what-can-we-do-legally-about-broken-hearts-in-the-workplace/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Workplace Romance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=156191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Littler: What can we do (legally!) about broken hearts in the workplace? Dear Littler: I’m a manager at a mid-sized company, and I overheard in the breakroom that two of our employees who were dating appear to have broken up, and another employee announced he is in the process</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/dear-littler-what-can-we-do-legally-about-broken-hearts-in-the-workplace/">Dear Littler: What can we do (legally!) about broken hearts in the workplace?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Muldrow Ends: Tenth Circuit Refuses to Extend Relaxed Harm Standard to Hostile Work Environment Claims</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/where-muldrow-ends-tenth-circuit-refuses-to-extend-relaxed-harm-standard-to-hostile-work-environment-claims/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=153325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of the United States lowered the bar for establishing a discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in its 2024 opinion, Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, holding that an employee need only show “some” harm—not a significant change—in working conditions. According</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/where-muldrow-ends-tenth-circuit-refuses-to-extend-relaxed-harm-standard-to-hostile-work-environment-claims/">Where Muldrow Ends: Tenth Circuit Refuses to Extend Relaxed Harm Standard to Hostile Work Environment Claims</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC Rescinds Enforcement Guidance on Harassment</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/eeoc-rescinds-enforcement-guidance-on-harassment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=153247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>EEOC Rescinds Enforcement Guidance on Harassment On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission voted to rescind its Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace. The proposal to rescind the guidance was approved two-to-one, with Chair Andrea Lucas (R) and Commissioner Britanny Panuccio (R) voting to repeal the</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/eeoc-rescinds-enforcement-guidance-on-harassment/">EEOC Rescinds Enforcement Guidance on Harassment</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>EntertainHR: Flag on the Play: Power Dynamics and Workplace Romance  </title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/entertainhr-flag-on-the-play-power-dynamics-and-workplace-romance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Workplace Romance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=152066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Michigan football recently made headlines after the university terminated its head football coach following an internal investigation that revealed “credible evidence” of an inappropriate relationship between the former coach and a staff member. The university later affirmed its “zero tolerance” policy for such behavior. The decision and resulting headlines underscore the legal and reputational consequences that can arise when</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/entertainhr-flag-on-the-play-power-dynamics-and-workplace-romance/">EntertainHR: Flag on the Play: Power Dynamics and Workplace Romance  </a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Adopts Stricter Standard for Employer Liability in Third-Party Harassment Cases</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/federal-court-adopts-stricter-standard-for-employer-liability-in-third-party-harassment-cases/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Harassment By Non-Employees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=145425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On October 31, 2025, a federal district court ruled that the University of Pennsylvania could not be held liable for harassing behavior by a student toward a research associate. The case sheds light on an evolving standard for employer liability for harassment by non-employees.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/federal-court-adopts-stricter-standard-for-employer-liability-in-third-party-harassment-cases/">Federal Court Adopts Stricter Standard for Employer Liability in Third-Party Harassment Cases</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the Exclusive: Highly Sensitive Sexual Harassment and Assault Investigations (Podcast)</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/inside-the-exclusive-highly-sensitive-sexual-harassment-and-assault-investigations-podcast/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - General]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=144248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast recorded at our 2025 Corporate Labor and Employment Counsel Exclusive® seminar, Tiffany Stacy (office managing shareholder, San Antonio) and Lisa Burton (office managing shareholder, Boston, Portland, ME) explore the complexities of conducting investigations of highly sensitive issues. Lisa and Tiffany offer insights and tips for handling claims</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/inside-the-exclusive-highly-sensitive-sexual-harassment-and-assault-investigations-podcast/">Inside the Exclusive: Highly Sensitive Sexual Harassment and Assault Investigations (Podcast)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sixth Circuit Limits Employer Liability for Harassment by Nonemployees</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/sixth-circuit-limits-employer-liability-for-harassment-by-nonemployees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 19:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Harassment By Non-Employees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=131435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sixth Circuit Limits Employer Liability for Harassment by Nonemployees On August 8, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled an employer is not liable for harassment of an employee by a third party unless the employer intended for the harassment to occur. This stark departure from</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/sixth-circuit-limits-employer-liability-for-harassment-by-nonemployees/">Sixth Circuit Limits Employer Liability for Harassment by Nonemployees</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the Employer Intend for the Customer to Harass Its Employee? The Sixth Circuit Sets a High Bar</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/did-the-employer-intend-for-the-customer-to-harass-its-employee-the-sixth-circuit-sets-a-high-bar/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Harassment By Non-Employees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=130850</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently held that an employer will be liable for a customer’s harassment of an employee only when it intends for such harassment to occur. This ruling diverges sharply from the stance of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and all</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/did-the-employer-intend-for-the-customer-to-harass-its-employee-the-sixth-circuit-sets-a-high-bar/">Did the Employer Intend for the Customer to Harass Its Employee? The Sixth Circuit Sets a High Bar</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of Intent for Employers to be Liable for Harassment by a Nonemployee</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/sixth-circuit-requires-proof-of-intent-for-employers-to-be-liable-for-harassment-by-a-nonemployee/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Harassment By Non-Employees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=130217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On August 8, 2025, in Bivens v. Zep, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that employer liability for nonemployee harassment requires proof of the employer&#8217;s intent, a departure from the previous negligence standard historically relied upon by other federal appellate courts in accordance with prior EEOC guidance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/sixth-circuit-requires-proof-of-intent-for-employers-to-be-liable-for-harassment-by-a-nonemployee/">Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of Intent for Employers to be Liable for Harassment by a Nonemployee</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Hot Take on a Cold Play: How Properly Negotiated Executive Contracts Can ‘Fix You’ Following Executives’ Bad Behavior</title>
		<link>https://www.elinfonet.com/a-hot-take-on-a-cold-play-how-properly-negotiated-executive-contracts-can-fix-you-following-executives-bad-behavior/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogletree Deakins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 16:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment - Workplace Romance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.elinfonet.com/?p=127305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Forced song title references aside, the recent scandal at a Coldplay concert has become a hotly discussed topic across popular culture. Although an executive’s alleged public dalliance with a subordinate—who also happens to be an executive in human resources—may be an entertaining read generally, in today’s hyper-connected world, coupled with</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com/a-hot-take-on-a-cold-play-how-properly-negotiated-executive-contracts-can-fix-you-following-executives-bad-behavior/">A Hot Take on a Cold Play: How Properly Negotiated Executive Contracts Can ‘Fix You’ Following Executives’ Bad Behavior</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.elinfonet.com">Employment Law Information Network</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
