<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Shahid's Perspectives</title>
	
	<link>http://shahid.shah.org</link>
	<description>an enterprise architect's view of the world</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ShahidsPerspectives" /><feedburner:info uri="shahidsperspectives" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Balsamiq Mockups is a good tool for requirement elicitation</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/By50eKnxZE0/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=196#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve all heard how a substantial number of software projects fail or are cancelled routinely. For years developers have said “if only the requirements were right, the software would have worked right.” Intuitively we all understand that the better the user community (business users in many cases) can get the product defined the more likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve all heard how a substantial number of software projects fail or are cancelled routinely. For years developers have said “if only the requirements were right, the software would have worked right.” Intuitively we all understand that the better the user community (business users in many cases) can get the product defined the more likely the software will work. Agile processes and methodologies insist that the best way to do this is to show early and show often the fruits of the development labor but hold back on writing pages and pages of specifications. </p>
<p>A new category of software, known as prototyping, application simulation, or application modeling tools, allow end users to create quick prototypes and workflows that can be handed to developers to do the actual coding. </p>
<p>A while back I recommended taking a look at <a href="http://www.axure.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.axure.com');">Axure</a> but recently I&#8217;ve seen another one that I like just called <a href="http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.balsamiq.com');">Balsamiq Mockups</a>. I still like Axure a bit more because of the artifacts it generates and it&#8217;s overall much more sophisticated but Balsamiq also does a great job and has an XML format that developers can use for generating the artifacts themselves.</p>
<p>If you can actually get your end users or business customer helping define your custom projects using a prototyping or simulation tool almost any amount of money is worth the investment if your projects are important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=196</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=196</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Demo Your Startup</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/FzpPNpm9sG8/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=195#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an article I wish I wrote. It&#8217;s about how to demonstrate your startup or business idea to a stranger on the phone or in an audience. Since people pitch me their products (which I enjoy, of course), I see lots of demos every month. At then end of each demo I almost always [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/09/how-to-demo-your-startup/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">This is an article</a> I wish I wrote. It&#8217;s about how to demonstrate your startup or business idea to a stranger on the phone or in an audience. Since people pitch me their products (which I enjoy, of course), I see lots of demos every month. At then end of each demo I almost always give advice on how the demo could have gone better and the folks at TechCrunch have captured it quite nicely. Check it out and learn from both <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/09/how-to-demo-your-startup/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">Part I</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/01/how-to-demo-your-startup-part-two/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" target="_blank">Part II</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=195</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=195</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Evolution of Virtualization: Qumranet joins Red Hat</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/eClH0jknkYM/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=194#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this press release that caught my eye (thanks, Rich):
Red Hat today announced the acquisition of Qumranet, Inc. The acquisition includes Qumranet&#8217;s virtualization solutions, including its KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine) platform and SolidICE offering, a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), which together present a comprehensive virtualization platform for enterprise customers. In addition, in connection with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this <a href="http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.redhat.com');" target="_blank">press release</a> that caught my eye (thanks, Rich):</p>
<blockquote><p>Red Hat today announced the acquisition of Qumranet, Inc. The acquisition includes Qumranet&#8217;s virtualization solutions, including its KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine) platform and SolidICE offering, a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), which together present a comprehensive virtualization platform for enterprise customers. In addition, in connection with the deal, Qumranet&#8217;s talented team of professionals that develop, test and support Qumranet solutions, and its leaders of the open source community KVM project, will join Red Hat.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is very good news for the free (built-in an OS) virtualization market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=194</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=194</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>XTS’s Citrix reporting tools just keep on getting better</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/ZaKWd0iIdH8/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=193#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been some time since I last wrote about XTS, a rapidly growing virtualization management vendor focused on the Citrix market. In my recent interview with Eric Spiegel, CEO, I found out that XTS has had many important changes this year. On the product side, they launched a new, more powerful version of their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been some time since I last <a href="http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/114" >wrote about XTS</a>, a rapidly growing virtualization management vendor focused on the Citrix market. In my recent interview with Eric Spiegel, CEO, I found out that XTS has had many important changes this year. On the product side, they launched a new, more powerful version of their analysis and reporting solution and renamed it Introspect for XenApp. On the staffing side, they added two Citrix sales veterans including Charlie Clements, the former Citrix VP of Americas. Getting Charlie was a big deal and I commended Eric for snagging him. </p>
<p>But, most interesting to me was that last week they released a free utility that enables Citrix administrators and architects to easily create configuration reports for their Citrix farms.</p>
<p>Unlike the full product Introspect, which is focused on usage data captured in the Resource Manager summary database, the free configuration report generator utilizes the ubiquitous Citrix data store and features the same flexible, easy to use interface that they have always had in Introspect for quickly creating reports exactly the way you need them.</p>
<p>I see it as being useful for the following tasks:</p>
<ul>
<li>Documenting implementations and upgrades </li>
<li>Creating baselines for troubleshooting, audits and disaster recovery</li>
<li>Identifying incorrect server configurations, either to solve a problem or proactively reduce help desk calls</li>
<li>Ensuring consistency of hotfixes across a Citrix farm</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, integration with Active Directory can be leveraged for better insight into user and application assignments. Other bells and whistles like automated scheduling, report distribution via email and the ability to customize look and feel of report output can also be found in this robust piece of free code. </p>
<p>Anyone can <a href="http://www.xtsinc.com/dnn/ShahidShahlandingpage/tabid/437/Default.aspx" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.xtsinc.com');">download the free configuration report generator</a> from the XTS website. It is currently packaged as a fully functional virtual machine and includes a sample Resource Manager summary database so you can try Introspect&#8217;s starter templates to evaluate the historical usage reporting and analysis capabilities as well. Please also note that they recently simplified their pricing model and now base it on the number of Resource Manager summary databases, which makes Introspect very affordable in my opinion.</p>
<p>If you are a Citrix administrator or architect I suggest checking out this free utility from XTS which will probably help you save time and possibly some headaches in the future. </p>
<p> If you&#8217;ve already downloaded a copy and tried it, drop us a line here and let us know how it&#8217;s working out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=193</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=193</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>OS choices not as easy as they once were</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/gQPiJcy-9Fs/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=192#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 14:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most of us probably know, Windows Server is currently the most popular choice for most &#8220;mission critical&#8221; packaged applications for office automation — but, that&#8217;s changing. According to Forrester Research, &#8220;firms name a wide variety of operating systems (OSes) that they use for critical apps, and 29% name two or more. More than half [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As most of us probably know, Windows Server is currently the most popular choice for most &#8220;mission critical&#8221; packaged applications for office automation — but, that&#8217;s changing. According to Forrester Research, &#8220;firms name a wide variety of operating systems (OSes) that they use for critical apps, and 29% name two or more. More than half of North American enterprises would consider switching OSes, and among them, Linux is the top choice, with 37% of switchers.&#8221; </p>
<p>What does this mean? For one, don&#8217;t just assume Windows is the only game in town. It also means that your customers are going to want more control over their OS decision. My own work in the government consulting arena has shown that non-Windows server are gaining popularity as well (anecdotally).</p>
<p>The best way to &#8220;future proof&#8221; yourself is to choose an operating system that you can easily deploy as a virtual appliance. I&#8217;ve been recommending this to most of my clients for the past few years but it&#8217;s even more important now. What this means is that instead of shipping package software with an installer, just ship a completely stripped down virtual appliance running either Linux or or free operating system and include your database, OS, app, and everything together in one &#8220;system&#8221;. Later, if users want to move to a different database they simply switch configurations.</p>
<p>To help with your virtual appliance building, installation, and maintenance check out <a href="http://www.rpath.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.rpath.com');">rPath</a>. They&#8217;ve got some nice solutions when you&#8217;re building either physical or virtual appliances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=192</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=192</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Management 2.0</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/wBanr2GL_PI/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=191#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are CIOs seen as obstacles to innovation? In a nice interview with Gary Hamel, Allan Alter at CIO Insight writes:

The efficiency-focused management model has run its course, says strategist Gary Hamel. To see the future of management, look to the Internet, open source, free markets and democratic institutions.

It&#8217;s a good article. Some other interesting snippets:

Has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are CIOs seen as obstacles to innovation? In a nice interview with Gary Hamel, Allan Alter at <a href="http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2181323,00.asp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.cioinsight.com');">CIO Insight</a> writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The efficiency-focused management model has run its course, says strategist Gary Hamel. To see the future of management, look to the Internet, open source, free markets and democratic institutions.
</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a good article. Some other interesting snippets:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Has management as we know it reached the end of the road? Strategy expert Gary Hamel thinks so. Yes, traditional management approaches have led us to achieve great things. &#8220;If you have a couple of cars in the garage, a television in every room and a digital device in every pocket, you can thank the inventors of modern management,&#8221; he writes in his upcoming book The Future of Management (Harvard Business School Press, October 2007; $26.95). But our century-old emphasis on planning, organizing and controlling won&#8217;t help companies solve their 21st century problems. In an era marked by global competition and commoditization, adaptability, speed and creativity are essential for survival, says Hamel, whose previous books, &#8220;Leading the Revolution&#8221; and &#8220;Competing for the Future&#8221; (with C.K. Prahalad), earned him a reputation as one of the great strategic thinkers of our time. &#8220;The old management model is simply not good enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>The future management model is taking shape, but some aspects are already evident, Hamel told CIO Insight executive editor Allan Alter. Companies will finally begin to be as open and democratic inside their doors as societies are outside those doors. Go/no-go decisions on projects and investments now made by a handful of executives will be made collectively by hundreds of employees.</p>
<p>Talent will matter far more than titles. And one of the most important catalysts and models for 21st century management will be the Internet.
</p></blockquote>
<p>If you&#8217;re a manager today, especially an IT manager, it&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2181326,00.asp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.cioinsight.com');">good article</a> to check out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=191</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=191</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Running ColdFusion applications on Java using the smith project</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/k_bvwCsONm8/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=189#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written thousands of lines of ColdFusion in my web-career (the last line being around 2001) and I was always impressed by CF&#8217;s capabilities. I just ran across this new freeware (not open source yet, though) project that allows ColdFusion to run on Java without paying anything for a CF server. Seems very cool.
Check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written thousands of lines of ColdFusion in my web-career (the last line being around 2001) and I was always impressed by CF&#8217;s capabilities. I just ran across this new freeware (not open source yet, though) project that allows ColdFusion to run on Java without paying anything for a CF server. Seems very cool.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smithproject.org/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.smithproject.org');">Check out the&nbsp;Smith project</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Smith is a freeware, cross-platform ColdFusion engine, written entirely in Java. Running on the top of <em>Java Runtime Environment</em> and <em>Java Servlet Container</em>, it can be virtually deployed on any operating system and work with any web server. Smith represents lightweight, yet reliable alternative to the existing ColdFusion servers. It supports most important CF features (see <a href="http://www.smithproject.org/product_features.cfm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.smithproject.org');">Features</a>) and already drives several large ColdFusion applications. </p>
<p>Deeply integrated in J2EE, Smith works as part of ordinary Java Web application and can easily be used together with servlets and JSPs. The server behaviour is easily configurable through the simple Web interface where database connections, debugging options, server mappings and more can be set.  </p>
<p>Smith is freeware software, which means that it comes with permission for anyone to use, copy, and distribute it. It is also being seriously considered to open-source it.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.smithproject.org/download.cfm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.smithproject.org');">Download</a> and try fully functional version of the Smith engine. </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=189</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=189</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical leadership advice</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/aNJCL6NymS4/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of my younger colleagues often ask about what some of the most important leadership aspects are for technical managers like team leads or architects. There are no hard and fast rules but here are some things I&#8217;ve learned over the years:

Make Decisions. This is one of the most important aspects of leadership &#8212; just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of my younger colleagues often ask about what some of the most important leadership aspects are for technical managers like team leads or architects. There are no hard and fast rules but here are some things I&#8217;ve learned over the years:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Make Decisions.</strong> This is one of the most important aspects of leadership &#8212; just making a decision and not analyzing for weeks or months. No amount of evidence or information will ever &#8220;be enough&#8221; and at some point you&#8217;ll need to make a decision. Your team can see if you are timid or if you take risks. Leadership is about decision making and if your decision making skills or risk taking ability are limited, don&#8217;t bother trying to lead. I&#8217;ve seen many architects and so-called &#8220;team leads&#8221; that try to get their bosses to make their decisions for them so they don&#8217;t get in trouble for making &#8220;the wrong ones&#8221;. Big mistake.</li>
<li><strong>Lead by Example</strong>. Leadership is about direction and if you want to lead, you&#8217;ll need to make sure you take charge and establish that you know where you want to go. But, be prepared to demonstrate that you do what you ask your team to do. If you ask everyone else to do something but don&#8217;t do it yourself, your team will lose respect.</li>
<li><strong>Be transparent</strong>. You work with bright people and although they may not be your equals in experience or knowledge, they will know when you are making decisions based on whim or reason. If you can&#8217;t explain your decisions in a way that your team can comprehend then you&#8217;re not a good leader.</li>
<li><strong>Mentor. </strong>Good leaders create the next group of leaders, not just bark orders. If you&#8217;re not regularly mentoring and training, you&#8217;re not doing your job. And, if you mentor well you can let your team make many of the decisions without you and you&#8217;ll be able to trust that their decisions will be as good as yours.</li>
<li><strong>Be inclusive. </strong>You&#8217;re the leader and can make all the decisions and everyone knows that. But, if you&#8217;re not including input from everyone you&#8217;re losing valuable data and a chance to build a cohesive team.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=187</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=187</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent Verification and Validation: The NASA Approach</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/DlY5KZ_Dgxs/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=186#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very few of us deal with the kinds of problems that engineers at NASA face &#8212; except for perhaps other engineers working in safety critical fields like avionics and medical devices. I live nearby NASA&#8217;s Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), which is home to one of the most advanced software engineering labs in the world. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very few of us deal with the kinds of problems that engineers at NASA face &#8212; except for perhaps other engineers working in safety critical fields like avionics and medical devices. I live nearby NASA&#8217;s Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), which is home to one of the most advanced software engineering labs in the world. As you can imagine, they take their engineering processes very seriously so when they put together an event open to the public I usually attend.</p>
<p>Recently they put together a talk on <em>Independent Verification and Validation: The NASA Approach</em>. This presentation described how verification and validation is executed within NASA. It &#8220;described what IV&amp;V is and what it is not, the process that NASA uses to determine what projects the IV&amp;V Program will work with, the approach that the IV&amp;V Program takes to planning the tasks to be executed and how those tasks are executed.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://ses.gsfc.nasa.gov/ses_data_2006/060912_IVV_Abstract.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/ses.gsfc.nasa.gov');">View the abstract and speaker bio</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mediaman.gsfc.nasa.gov/Colloquia_asx/public/SES/2006/SES20060912.asx" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/mediaman.gsfc.nasa.gov');">Watch the event</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ses.gsfc.nasa.gov/ses_data_2006/060912_IVV.ppt" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/ses.gsfc.nasa.gov');">View the PowerPoint presentation</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=186</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=186</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Computer Language Shootout Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/jOWWVf59Nv8/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=185#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you haven&#8217;t seen them before, it&#8217;s interesting to look at how different computer languages implementations fare on different hardware. Check them out at The Computer Language Shootout Benchmarks.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you haven&#8217;t seen them before, it&#8217;s interesting to look at how different computer languages implementations fare on different hardware. Check them out at <a href="http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/shootout.alioth.debian.org');">The Computer Language Shootout Benchmarks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=185</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=185</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Benefits of Working With Tech Startups</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/4vzzrwXxEEA/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=184#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend&#160;Eric Spiegel&#8217;s just finished a&#160;nice article on working with startups. It&#8217;s a great explanation to customers on why they should do it and what some of the challenges are.&#160;
The challenge that early stage firms encounter is that customers don’t usually understand they need to deal differently with a startup than an established technology vendor. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend&nbsp;Eric Spiegel&#8217;s just finished a&nbsp;nice <a href="http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/article.php/3630671" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/itmanagement.earthweb.com');">article</a> on working with startups. It&#8217;s a great explanation to customers on why they should do it and what some of the challenges are.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>The challenge that early stage firms encounter is that customers don’t usually understand they need to deal differently with a startup than an established technology vendor. Let’s be clear what “early stage” means. A company with 50 employees, a few million in revenue and a version three product is <i>not</i> early stage. A company with a handful of employees and almost no revenue with a version one (or beta) product is most definitely early stage.  </p>
<p>&#8230; </p>
<p>By working with an early stage vendor, you can gain a competitive advantage on your competitors who aren’t willing to take this risk. You’ll have first access to thought-leaders and an innovative product. This will enable you to build and fine tune processes and best practices to get the most out of the new product. When your competition finally discovers the vendor, you will be light years ahead in getting the most out of this investment. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/article.php/3630671" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/itmanagement.earthweb.com');">The Benefits of Working With Tech Startups</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=184</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=184</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Modeling Tools</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/fSfMvAQft9U/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=183#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re looking for a good overview of available data modeling tools (includes open source and commercial ones), check out this link: Data Modeling Tools. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re looking for a good overview of available data modeling tools (includes open source and commercial ones), check out this link: <a href="http://www.databaseanswers.com/modelling_tools.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.databaseanswers.com');">Data Modeling Tools</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=183</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=183</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NIST Releases Recommendations for Securing Web Services</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/v8g1o3hsjtg/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=182#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
NIST Special Publication 800-95 addresses security needs for networks in which automated Web services are being deployed in service-oriented architectures.&#160; It&#8217;s only in draft but it covers the basics fairly well. If you&#8217;re doing business with the government and you plan to offer consumable services it&#8217;s worth making sure you follow the recommendations since the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>NIST <a href="http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/41854-1.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.gcn.com');">Special Publication 800-95</a> addresses security needs for networks in which automated Web services are being deployed in service-oriented architectures.&nbsp; It&#8217;s only in draft but it covers the basics fairly well. If you&#8217;re doing business with the government and you plan to offer consumable services it&#8217;s worth making sure you follow the recommendations since the NIST requirements will start showing up in RFPs soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=182</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=182</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Web-based QA</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/DqcQm5p6JUw/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=181#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;I saw an interesting service offering recently. Check Autoriginate: Intelligent testing made convenient. Here&#8217;s how they describe themselves:
HostedQA is the industry&#8217;s first web-based QA solution. With a focus on making automated testing convenient and ensuring that the resulting test scripts are intelligent, HostedQA is generations ahead of the competition. No longer do you have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;I saw an interesting service offering recently. Check <a href="http://www.autoriginate.com/hostedqa.jsp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.autoriginate.com');">Autoriginate: Intelligent testing made convenient</a>. Here&#8217;s how they describe themselves:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>HostedQA</b> is the industry&#8217;s first web-based QA solution. With a focus on making automated testing <u>convenient</u> and ensuring that the resulting test scripts are <u>intelligent</u>, HostedQA is generations ahead of the competition. No longer do you have to settle for automating only the playback of your tests. HostedQA automates the <i>entire</i> automated testing cycle. We&#8217;ll guide you through everything from setting up your databases and application servers to taking simple-to-understand visual screenshots of each step in the test.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had a chance to play with it yet, but I&#8217;m going to check it out further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=181</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=181</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Event: Profiling the Agile Architect</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/Cut5OziciSs/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=180#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you know, last year I co-founded the International Association of Software Architects&#8217; (IASA) Mid-Atlantic Chapter and we&#8217;ve had some great events in the DC area. This Thursday we&#8217;ve got Jeff Nielsen, Chief Scientist at Digital Focus, talking to us about Agile Architecture. Jeff trains and mentors teams and individuals in the use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many of you know, last year I co-founded the International Association of Software Architects&#8217; (IASA) Mid-Atlantic Chapter and we&#8217;ve had some great events in the DC area. This Thursday we&#8217;ve got Jeff Nielsen, Chief Scientist at Digital Focus, talking to us about Agile Architecture. Jeff trains and mentors teams and individuals in the use of agile methodologies and has over 19 years of commercial software development experience; he has architected a number of mission-critical and enterprise-level systems.</p>
<p>Jeff&#8217;s talk on Thursday, which is being held in Reston from 6 to 9p, is called &#8220;Profiling the Agile Architect.&#8221; Based on years of experience leading development in a prominent all-agile company, Jeff describes &#8220;the ideal architect on an agile software development team&#8221;. According to Jeff, &#8220;in my work leading and coaching agile teams, I have observed that having an effective architect on the project is essential to the overall success of the project and of the system being built.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://iasa-midatlantic.org/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/iasa-midatlantic.org');">Check out the announcement</a>.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=180</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=180</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s easier to get in than to get out</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/gwWqDBGY4F4/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=179#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve all seen it: we spend weeks or months in the &#8220;sales and demo cycle&#8221; for our applications. If we&#8217;re lucky we consider all workflows, if we&#8217;re even luckier we test drive the UI and make sure training goes smoothly, if we&#8217;re smart we also try to ensure that deployment will be easy. However, what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve all seen it: we spend weeks or months in the &#8220;sales and demo cycle&#8221; for our applications. If we&#8217;re lucky we consider all workflows, if we&#8217;re even luckier we test drive the UI and make sure training goes smoothly, if we&#8217;re smart we also try to ensure that deployment will be easy. However, what we all seem to forget is to figure out <em>how to get out</em> of an application or system after it&#8217;s been installed for a while.</p>
<p>Why is getting out important? Because every application becomes &#8220;legacy&#8221; sooner or later. Every system will be replaced or augmented at some point in time. The cost of acquisition (&#8221;barrier to entry&#8221;) is well understood now as something we need to calculate. How about the barrier to exit or switching cost? Do we calculate that when we decide what systems to purchase? Why not?</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t answer the &#8220;how, in&nbsp;24 months, will I be able to move on to the next-better technology or system?&#8221; question then you&#8217;ve not completed your due diligence in the sales cycle.  </p>
<p>When preparing an RFI or RFP, ask vendors specific questions about how easy it is to get out of their technology (rather than just how easy to it is to deploy and interoperate). Put in specific test cases and have your folks consider this fact when they are looking at all new purchases. Here are some specific factors to consider:
<ul>
<li>Do you own your data or does the vendor?  </li>
<li>Is the <a href="http://www.health-itworld.com/newsitems/2006/march/03-16-06-commentary-data-models" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.health-itworld.com');">database structure</a> and all data easily accessible to you without involving the vendor? If only your vendor can see the data, you&#8217;re locked in so be very wary.  </li>
<li>Are the <a href="http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/235" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.healthcareguy.com');">data formats</a> that the system uses to communicate with other vendors open? If not, you don&#8217;t own your data.  </li>
<li>How much of the technology stack is based on industry standards? The more proprietary the tech, the more you&#8217;re locked in.  </li>
<li>Are all the programming APIs open, documented, and available without paying royalties or license costs? If not, when you try to get out you&#8217;ll pay <em>dearly</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have other considerations, share them here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=179</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=179</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Multi-Tenant Data Architecture</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/iQPtdgNT7-o/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=177#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has a couple of good articles on Multi-Tenant data architecture, where software as a service [SaaS] applications can all share a single database for multiple customers (&#8221;tenants&#8221;). The multi-tenant architecture and design is nothing new but the Microsoft guys have done a good job describing it.
Read the article here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has a couple of good articles on Multi-Tenant data architecture, where software as a service [SaaS] applications can all share a single database for multiple customers (&#8221;tenants&#8221;). The multi-tenant architecture and design is nothing new but the Microsoft guys have done a good job describing it.</p>
<p><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/architecture/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnbda/html/MlttntDA.asp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/msdn.microsoft.com');">Read the article here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=177</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=177</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Can’t We All Get Along?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/uD7wypNX9HI/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a nice article on QA groups: Can&#8217;t We All Get Along?.

— We&#8217;ve all had days when QA made things difficult. When we take a closer look at what caused it we usually find that there was some miscommunication between QA and the programmers. And this miscommunication was most likely caused by the business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a nice article on QA groups: <a href="http://jdj.sys-con.com/read/252268.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/jdj.sys-con.com');">Can&#8217;t We All Get Along?</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
— We&#8217;ve all had days when QA made things difficult. When we take a closer look at what caused it we usually find that there was some miscommunication between QA and the programmers. And this miscommunication was most likely caused by the business having unrealistic expectations of the development team or the business/programmers not understanding the best way to utilize QA. So where does QA fit?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=175</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=175</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Source Versus .Net Stacks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/1SUaqnftwpg/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=174#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eWeek did a decent review of open source (including Java) versus .NET &#8220;stacks&#8221; a few weeks ago. While the review wasn&#8217;t as thorough as I would have liked, the conclusions will let each side to walk away. And, it demonstrates one of the points I&#8217;ve been making for years: that open source stacks on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eWeek did a <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1986492,00.asp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.eweek.com');">decent review</a> of open source (including Java) versus .NET &#8220;stacks&#8221; a few weeks ago. While the review wasn&#8217;t as thorough as I would have liked, the conclusions will let each side to walk away. And, it demonstrates one of the points I&#8217;ve been making for years: that open source stacks on a Windows platform are a winning combination. I&#8217;m a huge fan of Linux but we shouldn&#8217;t drop Windows everytime we think of open source &#8212; there&#8217;s just as much use and benefits  of an open source stack on WinTel as any other platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=174</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=174</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t forget to do network simulation in all your testing efforts</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/x5HSs7i4rjM/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=173#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed that most of my clients have finally been convinced that unit testing and regular automated acceptance testing is a &#8220;good thing.&#8221; However, I&#8217;ve noticed that load/stress testing, while moving up in importance, still has a long way to go. Even those doing load testing, though, forget to do proper network simulation to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that most of my clients have finally been convinced that unit testing and regular automated acceptance testing is a &#8220;good thing.&#8221; However, I&#8217;ve noticed that load/stress testing, while moving up in importance, still has a long way to go. Even those doing load testing, though, forget to do proper network simulation to make sure that their tests will valid with &#8220;real world&#8221; network traffic.</p>
<p>So, the simple advice is to be sure to use network traffic generators and network load simulators when testing your software. A good option is something like <a href="http://www.simena.net/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.simena.net');">Simena</a>. It&#8217;s not expensive and works well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=173</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=173</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Using the Federal Transition Framework (FTF) to design your own governance documents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/VQc0NheFlZo/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=172#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 01:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you haven&#8217;t seen it already, the OMB&#8217;s new Federal Transition Framework (FTF) is an excellent approach to creating architecture governance documentation. I&#8217;ve been working with federal agencies on various enterprrise architecture (EA) initiatives for several years now and one of the problems we&#8217;ve always had has been communicating what the initiatives are, why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you haven&#8217;t seen it already, the OMB&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/a-2-EAFTF.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.whitehouse.gov');">Federal Transition Framework</a> (FTF) is an excellent approach to creating architecture governance documentation. I&#8217;ve been working with federal agencies on various enterprrise architecture (EA) initiatives for several years now and one of the problems we&#8217;ve always had has been communicating what the initiatives are, why they are important, how strategic or tactical they are, how they should be scheduled, etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been working with commercial firms trying to do similar architecture governance and they&#8217;ve faced the same kinds of problems of documenting the strategy. </p>
<p>The OMB&#8217;s new FTF is a good source for reviewing how to take enterprise-wide initiatives, document them, share the knowledge, and establish a process by which progress can be tracked.</p>
<p>Definitely worth taking a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=172</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=172</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Threat Modeling Web Applications</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/7sULc9L7JOE/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=171#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just ran across Microsoft&#8217;s Threat Modeling Web Applications article on MSDN. Worth checking out if you&#8217;re writing secure web apps.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/practices/topics/security/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnpag2/html/tmwa.asp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/msdn.microsoft.com');">Microsoft&#8217;s Threat Modeling Web Applications</a> article on MSDN. Worth checking out if you&#8217;re writing secure web apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=171</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=171</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Presentations from April 26th Oracle Architect Forum in Tysons Corner</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/w3FOORsyRGA/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=170#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 15:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you may not have had the opportunity to attend the Oracle Architect Forum a couple of weeks go so here&#8217;s the link that contains the briefing contents. 
Some of the case studies were helpful.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you may not have had the opportunity to attend the Oracle Architect Forum a couple of weeks go so <a href="http://www.oracle.com/events/architectforum/oaf_06q4_presentations.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.oracle.com');">here&#8217;s the link</a> that contains the briefing contents. </p>
<p>Some of the case studies were helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=170</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=170</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Vitamin — Nourishment to help the web grow</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/-9Qa-i9qhBY/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=169#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vitamin, a resource for web designers, developers and entrepreneurs just went live in version 2.0. It&#8217;s a pretty nice site discussing AJAX, the business of Web 2.0, CSS, Ruby, and other topics important to creators of SaaS and Web Apps. Worth checking out.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thinkvitamin.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.thinkvitamin.com');">Vitamin</a>, a resource for web designers, developers and entrepreneurs just went live in version 2.0. It&#8217;s a pretty nice site discussing AJAX, the business of Web 2.0, CSS, Ruby, and other topics important to creators of SaaS and Web Apps. Worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=169</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=169</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Source Business Intelligence and Reporting with BIRT</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/UUnLKaKm3VA/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=168#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JDJ ran an interesting article on BIRT &#8212; one of a now growing number of open source Biz Intelligence platforms that compete with the likes of Actuate and BusinessObjects. I haven&#8217;t used it yet, but if any of you have and would like to comment on your findings, let me know. 
Read more about it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDJ ran an interesting article on BIRT &#8212; one of a now growing number of open source Biz Intelligence platforms that compete with the likes of Actuate and BusinessObjects. I haven&#8217;t used it yet, but if any of you have and would like to comment on your findings, let me know. </p>
<p>Read more about it at JDJ: <a href="http://java.sys-con.com/read/204706.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/java.sys-con.com');">Business Intelligence and Reporting with BIRT</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=168</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=168</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching people how to become architects</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/L_fLWiMXQXo/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=167#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Jacobs talks about Project &#8220;Noodle&#8221;, a new Microsoft project designed to help people become architects. There&#8217;s a PowerPoint presentation called Architects and the Architecture of Software that&#8217;s a pretty nice intro and I&#8217;ll try and keep an eye on the project to see how it progresses and is able to meet its goal.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Jacobs talks about <a href="http://www.ronjacobs.com/Noodle/default.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.ronjacobs.com');">Project &#8220;Noodle&#8221;</a>, a new Microsoft project designed to help people become architects. There&#8217;s a PowerPoint presentation called <a href="http://www.ronjacobs.com/Slides/Module1-ArchitectsAndTheArchitectureOfSoftware.ppt" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.ronjacobs.com');"><i>Architects and the Architecture of Software</i></a> that&#8217;s a pretty nice intro and I&#8217;ll try and keep an eye on the project to see how it progresses and is able to meet its goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=167</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=167</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>AgileDraw “Virtually Notation-Free Modeling Technique”</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/1rKImwcFysI/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=166#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just ran across this interesting site, AgileDraw.org,  that helps agile modelers and programmers produce diagrams. Here&#8217;s how they describe it:

Agile Draw is a set of principles and styles for producing diagrams that communicate effectively. These principles can be used with any drawing technique or tools, from whiteboard to pencil and paper to computerized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across this interesting site, <a href="http://agiledraw.org/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/agiledraw.org');">AgileDraw.org</a>,  that helps agile modelers and programmers produce diagrams. Here&#8217;s how they describe it:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Agile Draw is a set of principles and styles for producing diagrams that communicate effectively. These principles can be used with any drawing technique or tools, from whiteboard to pencil and paper to computerized tools. The essence of Agile Draw is to use simple conventional drawing elements such as circles, boxes, connecting lines and text, in conventional ways that give diagrams a sense of life and a consistent way of communicating.</p>
<p>The Agile Draw principles are not new! Agile Draw is a simple summary of things we all know about drawing useful pictures.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=166</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=166</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Prejudging Talent Can Cost You</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/Z-8cbrUOzJE/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=165#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Eric Spiegel has just published his most recent article Prejudging Talent Can Cost You at Datamation.
The job market is getting pretty tight these days and it&#8217;s hard to find good people in a now pretty good economy. Eric&#8217;s suggestions are right on target. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Eric Spiegel has just published his most recent article <i><a href="http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/columns/smit/article.php/3598106" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/itmanagement.earthweb.com');">Prejudging Talent Can Cost You</a></i> at Datamation.</p>
<p>The job market is getting pretty tight these days and it&#8217;s hard to find good people in a now pretty good economy. Eric&#8217;s suggestions are right on target. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=165</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=165</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Conference on Intellectual Property in the Global Marketplace</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/r8KhNPZD4bg/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=164#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a patent holder and I train patent examiners on technology topics so I often see and sometimes work with the folks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). If all you know about the USPTO is what you read in the newspapers you should attend some events where you&#8217;ll meet the folks that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a patent holder and I train patent examiners on technology topics so I often see and sometimes work with the folks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). If all you know about the USPTO is what you read in the newspapers you should attend some events where you&#8217;ll meet the folks that work there. If have found most of the staff that I&#8217;ve encountered to be courteous, hard-working, caring, and really <i>trying</i> to do the right thing as often as possible. They have a pretty tough job, though, so it&#8217;s hard to know what&#8217;s right or wrong (I think they do pretty well).</p>
<p>If you think the patent process is broken or would like to learn more about it, I just got an email announcement this morning that you would find useful:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is holding a two-day conference to address the intellectual property needs of small and medium sized businesses, entrepreneurs, and independent inventors interested in manufacturing or selling their products abroad.</p>
<p>March 27 – Presentations to help conference attendees identify intellectual property assets and discuss the steps needed to protect those assets in the United States and abroad. Major presentations will cover patents, trademarks, copyright, and trade secrets.</p>
<p>March 28 – Presentations focusing on enforcement issues that may arise in protecting intellectual property rights in the United States and abroad including: patent, trademark, and copyright infringement; unfair competition; counterfeiting; and piracy.</p>
<p>This conference will also include one-on-one consultations between the USPTO attorneys and conference attendees on Monday and Tuesday afternoons.</p>
<p>This program is part of the Federal Government’s Strategy Targeting Organized Piracy (STOP) and the USPTO’s continuing commitment to increase public awareness of intellectual property rights and the enforcement of those rights in the global marketplace.</p>
<p>There is no charge to attend this event, but <a href="http://www.signup4.net/Public/ap.aspx?EID=IPAC16E" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.signup4.net');">seating is limited and registration is required</a>.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=164</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=164</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Code reviews vs. pair programming vs. static code analysis</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ShahidsPerspectives/~3/1h-0-RLmqGo/</link>
		<comments>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=163#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shahid.shah.org/index.php/archives/163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Andy over at The Disco Blog wrote recently about Code reviews vs. pair programming vs. static code analysis. He compares and contrasts some of the mechanisms used to improve code quality and why some may work better than others. Worth reading.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Andy over at <i>The Disco Blog</i> wrote recently about <a href="http://thediscoblog.com/?m=200603" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/thediscoblog.com');">Code reviews vs. pair programming vs. static code analysis</a>. He compares and contrasts some of the mechanisms used to improve code quality and why some may work better than others. Worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shahid.shah.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=163</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://shahid.shah.org/?p=163</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
