Yeah, or I heard it from Vice President Joe Biden countless times, as well as others on the side of government health care.

Mr. Lacking Reading Comprehension Skills, I already explained what I meant in my post. You can continue to assert that I claimed The American Osteopathic Association is state-run, but that will not make it so.

And you know, not only do you not need to read this blog, but you do not need to comment, either.

Wrong once again. You mean the ONE dictionary you cited — the Merriam-Webster dictionary — that had only recently changed the definition of marriage to conform to current, though still not majority, trends.

You find pleasure in being wrong, don’t you?

Yes, yes. The ten data points are tough for you, even though when defending your silly flub you said you KNEW that there were ten data points. You do have problems, that’s for sure. Let’s see what you said:

There are only THREE data points in that quote. You can read, can’t you?? I fully understand that Biden released 10 years worth of tax returns when he was running in 2008, but your quote only has THREE numbers. Give it up moron. [bold added for emphasis]

So, tell me, MISTER GUY THE PLAGIARIST, how is it you “fully” understood that there were ten data points and yet chose to only use three? I am sorry, but your defense is looking spectacularly stupid. (And what you are actually doing is looking for an external locus of control, which is a fairly liberal strategy: you are looking to blame me for your blunders. You are playing the victim rather poorly, but you are playing the victim. Unfortunately the cause of your difficulties is internal, not external.)

How many times must you be wrong before you realize that you live in denial?

As I’ve said repeatedly, you are wrong ad infinitum.

And ad nauseam.

Good luck.

This is *exactly* what you said Charity:
“She replied that she agrees with that recommendation, but with health care reform we are trying to eliminate unnecessary tests, so the American Osteopathic Association recommends scans at age 60.

60!

Welcome to state-run medical care, folks.”

Again, making the leap from what the AOA has voluntarily recommended to mandate by a “state-run entity” is quite a leap, even if you can’t recognize it yourself.

“in order to have state-run care, we need to eliminate ‘unnecessary’ tests”

Again, that is purely another assumption on your part.

“BTW, if you continue to be rude to other commenters, I will ban you from this blog.”

Please, this blog is DOA, and don’t do me any favors Charity.

Wrong again Billy-boy.

“it was YOU who turned several ridiculous times to the dictionary for help during our conversation regarding historic district commissions and gay marriage (in another thread here, ‘City Won’t Give An Inch’); recall how in that discussion, I schooled you in how a dictionary actually works.”

LOL…you mean those dictionaries that almost all define marriage as not only between a man & a woman?? Wow…

“Still having trouble with those ‘ten’ data points, there mister diminutive guy?”

No, YOU are, but there’s another nice bit of projection on your part there Billy-boy.

Are you serious? This is why I ignore your comments.

I wasn’t saying that it was a state-run entity.

Re-read it, Mr. Reading Comprehension. I said, “with health care reform we are trying to eliminate unnecessary tests” was the reason given for the recommendation being 30 years later than doctors recommend. In other words, Mr. Logical Conclusion, this is what is meant by “eliminating unnecessary tests,” when politicians say it. It means changing the recommendations to suit the goal of lowering costs.

In other words, Mr. Let’s Connect the Dots, in order to have state-run care, we need to eliminate “unnecessary” tests, and the way that will be done is to delay tests that are being done earlier now. That is, the quality of care will decline, as we evil conservatives have been claiming all along.

BTW, if you continue to be rude to other commenters, I will ban you from this blog. People are complaining about it. Grow up.

“Non-sensical back-peddling.” What exactly is that? Have you not YET learned how to spell — or think? It’s “back-pedaling,” not ‘back-peddling.” (The laughs truly do not stop.)

Truly, URAFW.

Here is a richly ironic sentence if there ever was one, and YOU wrote it:

Maybe to those that need to use a dictionary for every word that they come across, moron.

”

Please recall, if you can, that YOU sought a dictionary to define “justice.” YOU’RE the one who turned to the dictionary for help — and then PRETENDED you had not, plagiarist. I wasn’t the first to turn to a dictionary, you were. Moreover, it was YOU who turned several ridiculous times to the dictionary for help during our conversation regarding historic district commissions and gay marriage (in another thread here, “City Won’t Give An Inch”); recall how in that discussion, I schooled you in how a dictionary actually works. Well, to be accurate, I actually I could not have schooled you, because you are so utterly uncomprehending.

So, ONCE AGAIN, you are wrong, AND you have once AGAIN projected on to me what YOU YOURSELF have committed.

Still having trouble with those “ten” data points, there mister diminutive guy? Wow.

As I’ve said several times, you are rich. Good luck with aaaallllll that.

How is the “American Osteopathic Association” a “state-run” entity??

“Yet, Investor’s Business Daily reports that the House’s health care legislation goes so far as outlawing private coverage.”

LOL…IBD editorials are notoriously far Right-wing, period.

“We just can’t alter it or ever get another policy, if we move or change jobs.”

What?? How about enrolling in private *group* (as in groups of individuals) coverage instead, where the rates are usually much better??

“check out Steven Crowder’s undercover look at Canada’s system.”

Is anyone seriously proposing the Canadian health care system for down here in the USA??

“Instead maybe you can field calls from people who are pissed that Obama lied and not only did their taxes go up”

You mean those people that are making many multiple hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars?? Please…

“This whole push for government health care is based on anecdotal evidence.”

No, it really isn’t. This is like saying that we don’t actually have a health care problem in the USA.

I’d like to say that, from what I’ve read of this current health care reform so far, I haven’t found a whole lot that I’ve liked. The final bill is still a ways away from being clear though.

Too bad you can’t be bothered to add *actual citations* to your stolen “quotes” here, which is a pretty standard practice.

“By ‘according to the data,’ what did YOU think was meant?”

Once again Billy-boy, quit your nonsensical back-peddling. Show us the 10 data points that you used to calculate your phony numbers, or just go away.

“But I wonder if the authors of Merriam-Webster would agree with mister guy (he is just shrinking away) that THEIR definition is a ‘common definition’?”

And yet more useless back-peddling from you…ugh…it’s all you really have at the end of every, single day, eh Billy-Boy??

“So far, the Merriam-Webster definition is not particularly ‘common,’ is it?”

Maybe to those that need to use a dictionary for every word that they come across, moron.

“I know I said I’d be leaving formal polemics in this thread”

…and you lied…just like I knew that you would.

Anyway, I know what extrapolation is. I was not predicting from an example. I was presenting an example demonstrating that what I previously predicted is already coming to pass.

BTW, I don’t watch daytime talk shows. I started the post explaining how I came to find myself watching 5 minutes of The View, but I decided that it was not germane and deleted it. The kids were not home and I was channel surfing during the 15 minutes I had to eat lunch before I had to go pick them up.

Anyway, I’ll stop. Thanks again for promoting health care reform, and for this soon to be retired “She’s Right” blog. It’s been real. God bless you, Charity.