<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sonar</title>
	
	<link>http://www.sonarsource.org</link>
	<description>Open Source Quality Management Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SonarComments" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="sonarcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Pick your code coverage tool in Sonar 2.2 by Sridharan</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/pick-your-code-coverage-tool-in-sonar-2-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonarsource.org/?p=3914#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to get the dump of jacoco output file in XML format. I would like to know how to extract the code coverage output from the Jacoco output file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to get the dump of jacoco output file in XML format. I would like to know how to extract the code coverage output from the Jacoco output file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Measure Code Coverage by Integration Tests with Sonar by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/measure-code-coverage-by-integration-tests-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonarsource.org/?p=4229#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Concerning the behaviour of not showing 100% coverage, I found clarification here:
http://sonar-user.15.n6.nabble.com/it-coverage-jacoco-shows-inconsistent-wrong-data-or-misunderstanding-of-data-td3666799.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning the behaviour of not showing 100% coverage, I found clarification here:<br />
<a href="http://sonar-user.15.n6.nabble.com/it-coverage-jacoco-shows-inconsistent-wrong-data-or-misunderstanding-of-data-td3666799.html" rel="nofollow">http://sonar-user.15.n6.nabble.com/it-coverage-jacoco-shows-inconsistent-wrong-data-or-misunderstanding-of-data-td3666799.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Measure Code Coverage by Integration Tests with Sonar by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/measure-code-coverage-by-integration-tests-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonarsource.org/?p=4229#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>I noticed that classes that have 100% coverage disappear from the list. Example: You have an integration test on the same class with less than 100%, and you click on that class, then the Coverage tab indicates that unit tests are 100% and integration tests for example 60%. But you can't view the class metrics from the unit test perspective, because it's not there. Remove a test from the unit tests, and here it is again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that classes that have 100% coverage disappear from the list. Example: You have an integration test on the same class with less than 100%, and you click on that class, then the Coverage tab indicates that unit tests are 100% and integration tests for example 60%. But you can&#8217;t view the class metrics from the unit test perspective, because it&#8217;s not there. Remove a test from the unit tests, and here it is again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is coming up for Sonar in 2011 ? by Diogo Guerra</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/what-is-coming-up-for-sonar-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogo Guerra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonarsource.org/?p=4621#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>+1 for Scalar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 for Scalar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Flex Plugin for Sonar : a Further Step Toward Multi-Language Support by Freddy Mallet</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/the-flex-plugin-for-sonar-a-further-step-toward-multi-language-support/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy Mallet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3206#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>You call create a JIRA ticket on the "Flex" component of the "Sonar Plugins" project : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARPLUGINS/component/14297</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You call create a JIRA ticket on the &#8220;Flex&#8221; component of the &#8220;Sonar Plugins&#8221; project : <a href="http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARPLUGINS/component/14297" rel="nofollow">http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARPLUGINS/component/14297</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Flex Plugin for Sonar : a Further Step Toward Multi-Language Support by paul</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/the-flex-plugin-for-sonar-a-further-step-toward-multi-language-support/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3206#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>does anyone know how to submit a bug fix request for this plugin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know how to submit a bug fix request for this plugin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Differential Services in Sonar for a Complete Support of Continuous Inspection by Tomislav Nakic-Alfirevic</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/differential-services-in-sonar-for-a-complete-support-of-continuous-inspection/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomislav Nakic-Alfirevic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonarsource.org/?p=5172#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>@Denis
@Freddy
I opened an issue earlier today to track this exact suggestion before I saw the suggestion Denis made. Here's the issue:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONAR-3174

The use case is such that relaunching an analysis for the change to take effect is not a viable option (at least I wouldn't say so). Feel free to vote for the issue if you would like Sonar to allow immediate period switching without having to run another analysis.

I am aware it is quite likely that the request has implications to the underlying data processing engine and might be so difficult to implement that it might never be done, but I would say the requirement is nevertheless valid. I leave it up to others to judge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Denis<br />
@Freddy<br />
I opened an issue earlier today to track this exact suggestion before I saw the suggestion Denis made. Here&#8217;s the issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONAR-3174" rel="nofollow">http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONAR-3174</a></p>
<p>The use case is such that relaunching an analysis for the change to take effect is not a viable option (at least I wouldn&#8217;t say so). Feel free to vote for the issue if you would like Sonar to allow immediate period switching without having to run another analysis.</p>
<p>I am aware it is quite likely that the request has implications to the underlying data processing engine and might be so difficult to implement that it might never be done, but I would say the requirement is nevertheless valid. I leave it up to others to judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Release 1.0 BETA by Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/release-10-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar-doc.hortis.ch/release-10-beta/#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>Test commentaire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test commentaire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beyond the tool, Sonar is a platform to manage code quality by Freddy Malllet</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/beyond-the-tool-sonar-is-a-platform-to-manage-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy Malllet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=1298#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>In fact parsing objective-c source code is not so easy and that's why we haven't yet started working on such plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact parsing objective-c source code is not so easy and that&#8217;s why we haven&#8217;t yet started working on such plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Measure Code Coverage by Integration Tests with Sonar by Freddy Malllet</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/measure-code-coverage-by-integration-tests-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy Malllet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonarsource.org/?p=4229#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Please use only the Sonar User mailing list to get some support tante anni. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please use only the Sonar User mailing list to get some support tante anni. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

