<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Spamnation</title>
      <link>http://www.spamnation.info/</link>
      <description>A weblog about spam.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:51:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>419 vs LHC</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Nigerian scammers are creative people. From <a href="http://spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/04/we_are_assassin.html">imaginary hitmen</a> to American majors with suitcases full of Saddam's gold, to enough deceased relatives to fill a cemetery, to entire armies of princes, politicians and dictators, there seems no end to their inventiveness. But now, it seems they have turned their talents to writing actual science fiction.</p>

<p>Reproduced below is the full text of one imaginative scammer's latest message. Because after all, when the Large Hadron Collider destroys the Earth, who better than a Nigerian scammer to see you safe and sound?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/419_vs_lhc.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/419_vs_lhc.html</guid>
         <category>Scams</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:51:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Anonymous vs. Spamhaus</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Having been DDOS'd a couple of times ourselves (by Russian criminal gangs), we're not really big fans of DDOS attacks as an instrument of policy. And while <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(group)">Anonymous</a>'s collective heart is often in the right place, some of its members seem not to be exactly the quickest little ponies on the track. Point-and-click denial-of-service tools in the hands of the clueless: what could possibly go wrong?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/anonymous-vs-spamhaus.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/anonymous-vs-spamhaus.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:48:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Gawker hack - here comes the spam</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The recent <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5712785/">Gawker Media hack</a> exposed a large number of usernames and passwords, many of which were promptly re-used by spammers for an <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374242,00.asp">Acai spam run on Twitter</a>. In addition to sharing the password database, the <a href="http://www.geekosystem.com/gawker-hack-gnosis-web-security/">Gnosis hacker group</a> that pulled off the exploit also thoughtfully posted the email addresses of Gawker commenters for the benefit of any spammers who might care to use them.</p>

<p>Spammers have apparently now added the compromised email addresses to their mailing lists. I've just seen a Nigerian spam sent to a previously undisclosed address that was used uniquely for registration on a Gawker property. More will undoubtedly follow.</p>

<p>The lesson to learn from all this is that third-party user databases should be considered inherently insecure. Don't use the same username/password combination on multiple sites, and use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposable_e-mail_address">disposable email addresses</a> to register. That way when the site does get hacked, you aren't giving hackers and spammers the keys to some other part of your digital life and you can just dump the compromised address and move on.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/gawker-hack-spam-arriving.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/gawker-hack-spam-arriving.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:34:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Your password practices suck</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5712785/">servers belonging to Gawker Media were compromised</a>, and the usernames, email addresses and passwords for commenters on a number of popular sites (Lifehacker, Gizmodo, io9 etc) were posted. publicly. Although the passwords were encrypted, brute-forcing simple passwords once you have access to the password database is often a fairly simple task. As proof of this, spammers have already launched an <a href="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2010/12/13/acai-berry-spam-gawker-password-hack-twitter/">Acai Berry spam run on Twitter</a> by simply using usernames and passwords stolen from the Gawker databases to log in on Twitter. In a large number of cases, they seem to have succeeded. We can also expect spammers and phishers to start targeting the compromised email addresses shortly: I've already had email from one Web 2.0 startup "helpfully" letting me know about the Gawker fiasco: it's a judgment call whether that's good neighborliness or borderline spam.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/passwords-and-bad-practice.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/12/passwords-and-bad-practice.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:03:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Facebook Messages</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>At some point in the recent past, a weary anti-spammer, tired of explaining to people proposing their own Final Ultimate Solution to the Spam Problem (FUSSP) why their proposal wouldn't work, drew up a <a href="http://www.dmuth.org/fussp.html">form letter outlining the major objections</a> to their scheme, whatever it might be. Whoever wrote this was obviously <strong>very</strong> familiar with FUSSPs in all their forms.</p>

<p>Today, Facebook announced their intention to release a new messaging service with an email component, <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=452288242130">Facebook Messages</a>. Some <a href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/cell-phones/facebook-kill-spam-industry/11534.html">optimists are already hailing Facebook Messages as a FUSSP</a>. Are they right?</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/facebook-messages-is-not-a-fussp.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/facebook-messages-is-not-a-fussp.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:55:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>How much is that free iPad in the window?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>One type of spam that shows up occasionally is spam that advertises your chance to get  the hot technology item of the day - currently, that's typically an iPad or an iPhone - for "free". Here's a typical example:</p>

<blockquote>Subject: We are looking for iPad testers

We are looking for people who will be willing to test the iPad. The 
testing period will take 60 days. You only need to review and 
looking for bugs. After test you get to keep your iPad. You have 
no obligations. Spots are closing fast, so hurry and confirm 
your email address.</blockquote>

<p>Sounds good, right?</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/free-ipad-scam.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/free-ipad-scam.html</guid>
         <category>Scams</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:17:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Rise of the spamateur</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most trumpeted merits of the Internet is that it has the power to turn anyone into a publisher. The flipside of this is that it also has the power to turn anyone into a spammer. Yet amateur spammers &mdash; 'spamateurs', for want of a better word &mdash; are surprisingly rare. You see the occasional piece of affiliate spam with a homemade look, but the majority of affiliate or syndicated network marketing abuse is well-organized, large-scale activity, involving rented servers at colocation facilities, not one guy sitting at home with a PC. The loose network of providers sending out spam on behalf of "Canadian Health Care" are clearly at least semi-pro. A few persistent spammers seem to be one-man operations - what anti-spammers used to refer to derisively as "chickenboners" - but the real home spammer, the person who sits down at their PC and says <q>"Today I'll make some money from spam"</q> seems to be a rarity.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/rise-of-the-spamateur.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/rise-of-the-spamateur.html</guid>
         <category>Spammers</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:41:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Subject line of the Week</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This week's prize for the best prize-pitch scam subject line goes to Ademola Johnson. It just reads:</p>

<blockquote>Attention: Dear Prominent User of the Internet</blockquote>

<p>I can't decide whether I should put 'Prominent User of the Internet' on my business cards, or on a T-shirt. Or both.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/subject_line_of_the_week.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/subject_line_of_the_week.html</guid>
         <category>Scams</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:57:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Spammerthink</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>From a company calling itself Voltage Search Media, using the <span class="domain">manticoretechnology.com</span> mailing service, comes the following gem of a disclaimer:</p>

<blockquote>Our goal is not to SPAM you. Weve [sic] recently added your name to our database and want to share this information at no charge to you, but want to respect your privacy as well. Please opt-in to Voltage Search Media's online database by clicking the Opt-In button. You can opt-out now or at any time in the future. However, we request and encourage you to give us the oppotunity [sic] to prove our worth. You canOpt-in [sic] or Opt-out below.</blockquote>

<p>I'm so glad that the sender has generously decided to share this precious information about the <q>'Voltage Search Media game changing revolution'</q> at no cost to me. I'd hate to have to pay to be spammed.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/spammerthink.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/11/spammerthink.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:22:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Mr John Zhang</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you happen to own any domain names, you may one day be the lucky recipient of a message that begins something like:</p>

<blockquote>I'm  sorry  to disturb you so abrupt. We are a domain name registration service company in Asia, On 25th October. we received a formal application submitted by Mr. John Zhang who
wanted to use the keyword "blahblah" to register the Internet Brand and with suffix such as .cn /.com.cn /.net.cn /.hk /.asia / domain names. After our initial examination, we found that these domain names to be applied for registration  are same as your  domain name and trademark. ...</blockquote>

<p>The message goes on to say that they <q>'have hold down his registration'</q> for the time being (because apparently they suspect that Mr Zhang may be a <q>'domain investor'</q> and see this as their duty as an <q>'authorized anti-cybersquatting organization'</q>). However, if they don't hear from you in five days, they're going to go ahead and give Mr Zhang what he wants.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/10/ntchinanet-domain-dispute-scam.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/10/ntchinanet-domain-dispute-scam.html</guid>
         <category>Scams</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:02:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Somebody set us up the spam</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Many spammers are not native English speakers, and some of their messages may be a little eccentric. Lately, however, they seem to have been outdoing themselves. Consider, for example, this text which appeared on a pop-up dialog on one of those sites that pretends to be scanning your hard disk for viruses so that it can trick you into downloading a virus:</p>

<blockquote>Warning! On your computer detected the malicious code. Should immediately make sure that your system is safe! Killing Hazard (R) for Microsoft Windows XP immediately started to work.</blockquote>

<p>I'm not quite sure what all that means, but it does make me wonder if they're getting Yoda to write their texts for them.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/10/english-as-she-is-spammed.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/10/english-as-she-is-spammed.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:34:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>You can spam but you can&apos;t hide</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The comedian Jon Stewart, in one of his more inspired rants about duplicitous politicians, once asked in all seriousness <q>"Don't they know we're taping this stuff?"</q> It's not too smart to tell bare-faced lies about what you said six months before when everything you said is a matter of verifiable public record.</p>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/10/you-can-spam-but-you-cant-hide.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/10/you-can-spam-but-you-cant-hide.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:25:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Politik spams</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><q>"Politik kills, politik kills, politik kills"</q>, sings Manu Chao. But politik does something else as well. Politik spams. And with some kind of elections going on in Brazil, politik has started spamming up a storm.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/09/political-spam.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/09/political-spam.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:05:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Facebook connection?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As previously discussed, the Chinese fake-storefront scammers who have been using other people's Hotmail accounts to send spam have also been <a href="http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/04/gmail-can-get-hijacked-too.html">hijacking Gmail accounts</a>. Talking to people who have had their Gmail accounts hijacked has revealed one interesting fact: everyone we spoke to had used the same password for both Gmail and Facebook.</p>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/07/the-facebook-connection.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/07/the-facebook-connection.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:18:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Mimic flood</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Long-running spammer Canadian Pharmacy has a new trick, which it has been using obsessively over the last few days. It consists of sending out messages that exactly duplicate notifications from popular services (Amazon, Digg, Wikipedia, etc) but contain URLs that direct recipients to the pharmacy site.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/07/mimic-flood.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.spamnation.info/blog/archives/2010/07/mimic-flood.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:18:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
