Spin Assassin

Partisan and Proud

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:59:00 +0000

Here's an attack ad for you. What are you going to do about it lame stream media?

How about you sad sack Liberals? Come on! The truth is fighting words isn't it.

Didn't they put away 2 million dollars in case of a rainy attack ad day? Ha! -like they've got that kind of money. The NDP are a pack of kooks but at least they stand for something. Liberal's stand for whatever their audience wants to hear. They stand for nothing. Everyone except their media boosters know it.

I'm proud of my opinions. I'm partisan and proud. The Conservative Party doesn't support me, but I support them. They are the ONLY Political Party that is looking out for Canadians.

The thing that strikes me about the NCC ad is its content. Every word is absolutely true. Why is Steven Taylor the bad guy pointing out the truth? He's doing what a biased media is incapable of doing and he should be applauded for it. The facts about Bob Rae should be known. It's a public service. The NCC has every right to speak up about Bob Rae. I plan to join the National Citizens Coalition and help.

Newt Gingrich on the Keystone XL and Canada

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:41:00 +0000

Newt Gingrich won South Carolina by a landslide yesterday. His victory speech was excellent. He even mentioned Prime Minister Stephen Harper by name when talking about the Keystone XL.

Here is an excerpt from the speech specifically dealing with the Keystone XL pipeline.

Heady times these. Alberta and Canada are the epicenter of world attention. As we gear up for an important provincial election in the spring, Stephen Harper will be heading to China for an official visit.

Do you realize that we are the only good news economic story in the western world today? Good news and success just barely thwarted by petty bureaucrats, selfish politicians, and fanatical special interests. The story of the Alberta Oil Sands, the Keystone XL, and the Northern Gateway exquisitely encapsulates exactly what has gone wrong with our civilization. All thanks to progressives that riddle the left and have their hives on the right. Allison Redford is case in point.

The Prime Minister called it a "no-brainer," and so it is. We are living in Atlas Shrugged. Instead of rails its pipelines. All the greedy, stupid, lazy and corrupt actors are tripping over themselves to stop a good thing from happening.

We shall build these pipelines. We shall extract our oil. Canada's treasure shall be shared with the world for the good of all, and especially our own.

I have the rest of Newt's victory speech here as well. I've edited out all the thankyous to bring it down to 19 minutes or so. Well worth the time if you haven't seen it already.

Joe Oliver on Obama's Keystone Mistake

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:17:00 +0000

The Minister is on fire.

It's official. Obama has no brain. He loses borrowed billions on Solyndra and other bad idea's but you can't even force him to let a stable, friendly, environmentally sound ally spend private money creating jobs and controlling oil prices. He's a class 1 idiot. Certified, undeniable, Grade A, Presidential Moron.

Of course, the NDP helped this happen. Stupidity loves company.

How come nobody is happy about the pipeline form an environmental position? Pipelines are safer and more efficient than other means to transport anything. It was invented by the Romans for goodness sake. We've had thousands of years to perfect it! Its like being against glass or cement. The eco-nuts coined the term "the age of stupid" and I believe they are correct in that observation. It is truly the direction the left and the eco-lobby are taking our civilization.

The Best Political Ad of the GOP Nomination

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:08:00 +0000

So far its this ad from the Rick Santorum team: "Rebellion."

Exactly.

Incidentally Ron Paul is part of the above problem. I'm convinced Ron Paul is a foil to the Tea Party. Imagine if there was no candidate Ron Paul? Romney would also be history. Any time a tea party person talks fiscal conservatism they are trumped by extremist Ron Paul arguments. Then they are forced to defend the government against a nonsense argument of eliminating the government altogether. At the same time Ron Paul's foreign policy is left of Obama's. Ron Paul shoots himself with Taliban talking points and kooky concerns like not building a southern border fence in case Americans want to escape to Mexico (???!) someday.

Ron Paul and the Tea Party neatly cancel themselves out leaving you nothing but Romney. Call me cynical but I think the Ron Paul people just may have been duped into defeating themselves in favor of the progressive. Its just a theory but its how progressives work. Its also effectively turning out that way.

An American Perspective on Joe Oliver's Open Letter

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:20:00 +0000

Alex Epstein of the Center for Industrial Progress commented on Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver's open letter. It's interesting to see foreign opinions on the issue since foreign interests are a key component of this problem.

You might remember Alex from some exceptional interviews he did with clueless Occupiers last year. He also had a debate with a Greenpeace preacher and I was very impressed. I've been following him ever since.

Here is what he had to say about the labyrinthine green regulations in the United States:

The most important story about the American economy is the one that gets the least attention. America has enormous, incalculable, untapped potential to revolutionize its economy through industrial progress–through far greater productivity in energy production, in manufacturing, in construction, in mining, in transportation. But our industrial progress is halted by a labyrinth of so-called “green” policies–policies that have nothing to do with protecting Americans from pollution, and everything to do with protecting wilderness from Americans. At Center for Industrial Progress, we call this The Green Gauntlet.

Sounds familiar.

Naturally he applauds Minister Oliver saying:

It is exciting to see a prominent official blast Green obstruction of industrial progress.

It is exciting. Its so clear and direct that I thought it was a letter to the Minister at first read. I can't praise it enough. Joe Oliver's letter is a battle cry to anyone who loves this country and cares about its future. It's time we pushed back.

Alex Epstein's solution however is increased property rights. While I support property rights and would welcome strengthening them, I'm not sure its the best solution to our regulatory problem. If your property rights are infringed then you sue for damages. This isn't the way to prevent accidents. The fear of litigation has its place but this alone isn't enough.

An ounce of regulation prevents a pound of litigation. The trouble is we haven't got an ounce, we've got tons. Its way out of proportion to the actual risks and its run by people who have an interest in prolonging their bureaucrat jobs. The filibuster effect is a partnership between the folks running it and the folks abusing it. Its a partnership against many thousands of Canadian citizens who would directly benefit from the project and the many millions who would benefit indirectly.

I have a simple solution to this problem. We start holding these hearings in parallel. Every 100 people who wish to speak should generate another venue to speak simultaneously. The 4000 people registered would pass through 40 separate and simultaneous hearings. This would drastically reduce the length of the process. While it could be expensive at first, the fact that these special interests can't filibuster the process will stop them from trying. Eventually only the essential parties will wish to participate.

It's not at all true that every voice that expresses a desire to be heard should get to speak in these hearings. There should be some process to winnow out 3rd graders, cartoon characters and foreign activists. We could add application fees that could even be reimbursed if an application to speak is granted.

There are all kinds of options. There are reasonable options. I do not want the Northern Gateway Pipeline to end up being the Avro Arrow of our generation.

Here is Alex Epstein's debate with Greenpeace. They mention Keystone and the Oil Sands (though they say Tar Sands, don't take offense, eco-nuts perpetuate the old name). All of the arguments are the same so its worth watching for your own discussions. Its also pretty entertaining if you like debates.

How to Destroy Rick Santorum

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:15:00 +0000

Rick Santorum is Skeptical of Global Warming. That is to say he is a denier, like a holocaust denier. To allow him the label of a skeptic implies that there is a rational basis for his skepticism which leads to a discussion or debate on Global Warming.

Progressives must not allow a debate on Global Warming. The Science is settled. 97% of scientists who are 100% unknown agree with Al Gore that mankind is the sole cause of Global Warming. Deniers must be simply discredited and attacked until they are unelectable.

Reason is not required. Reason being that governments around the world are unable and unwilling to slow or reverse expansion in size and scope into our lives. The fact is that Global Warming is the best excuse since the idea of total war for increasing taxes and personal sacrifice to a collective threat. Progressives on the left and right do not lightly ignore this shortcut to total domination over the citizen.

I’ve compiled a short video of Rick Santorum’s heresy to Gaia for your judgment.

He isn’t just saying Global Warming is false to score some points with other skeptics. He genuinely believes it. Rick Santorum has a long record of skepticism on climate change and you can even see him start to get a little agitated at the end of the video. I get that way too when confronted with the 97% of all scientists canard. You can’t decide reality by a show of hands. It amazes me to have to repeat this over and over again to seemingly intelligent people. Reality is independent of all thought. It just is. You don’t need to perceive it, understand it, or even agree with it. Climate has changed over and over again on this planet without any input from mankind. Climate will keep changing with or without mankind’s miniscule help. Climate will change beyond any fantasy of control or symbolic gesture of sacrifice.

Rick Santorum is the real thing. He is a skeptic and a social conservative with an eye towards economic freedom. Just being a skeptic will save billions for the United States. Israel will enjoy Superpower support again. The US economy will take off and bring the world with it.

I’m not sure who Americans will pick to beat Obama. It’s their business and I wish them the greatest success with what ever happens. I would pick Rick Santorum.

My letter to Mars Incorporated.

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:59:00 +0000

To whom it may concern:

I am disappointed to learn that you have cancelled advertising on SUN NEWS in 2012 because of political pressure applied by organised socialist email campaigns.

I'd like to remind you that these sorts of people are brand snobs and only eat locally grown organic foods. They don't like wholesome, longstanding staple brands like Uncle Ben's. They would never put your products in their mouths let alone serve them to others.

I enjoy eating Mars products including UNCLE BEN's rice and I expected more from such a quality food corporation. Unfortunately this expertise does not apparently extend to your marketing department.

I am gravely disappointed to see you manipulated so easily by your enemies and opponents to SUN NEWS. There is a wide variety brands to chose from and unfortunately I may cease my patronage to Mars Incorporated and its affiliates.

SUN NEWS viewers are good and decent people who appreciate corporations with the moral fiber to stand with their customers.

I do hope you reconsider your decision and reaffirm that Uncle Ben's and Mars Incorporated is the kind of organisation I bring into my home on TV and feed to my loved ones.

Thank you

Alexander Fernandes

Can you do better? Give it a go and post your own here. Remember they aren't up for a blog rant. They are in business to please you, their customer who loves them.
(h/t Craig Smith)

Where was the CBC then?

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:32:00 +0000

Where was the Media then?

Stooges with their cameras
Watch our every move
Waiting for that one mistake
Some footage they can use
To smear the ones the fear the most
The ones that they despise
And fill the minds of spiteful pawns
With anger, hate, and lies

Exploit the children
Puppet the weak
Rile the masses again

Chorus:
Justify!
Where was the media then?
Tell us why!
Where was the media then?
But every time the truth came out
Where was the media then?
After fifty years of all your lies
Where was the media then?

When vegans kill in the name of peace
Holy men curse the white
Beheadings in Afghanistan
They vilify the Right
Voter fraud is just ignored
Acorns don't exist
But when the lies are exposed
It's Murdoch they insist

Exploit the children
Puppet the weak
Rile the masses again

Chorus

Hypocrisy is all we see
Hostility and misery
Always condescending
Until your mind in numb

Defenders of the free
The forth pillar they were meant to be
Masters of duplicity
The fifth column they've become

Exploit the children
Puppet the weak
Rile the masses again

Chorus
by Madison Rising

Happy Friday! Merry Christmas!

Kepler-22b and Social Engineering

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:24:00 +0000

I call bull crap on this "Earths Twin" hype.

Recently NASA found another extra solar planet but this one is special. It's in the "Goldilocks Zone." The Goldilocks Zone is a region around a star that can support life. It's not too hot, not too cold. Its just right for liquid water on the surface. The new planet, Kepler-22b, is supposed to be in this habitable zone.

I wouldn't be sending colonists there even if we could. I think Kepler-22b is a poisonous, toxic, hellhole. My guess is not only typical, but probable in this case. Let's look at NASA's diagram comparing the Solar system with the Kepler-22 system.

Notice how large the Goldilocks zone is? In our system, it includes the orbits of lifeless waterless Mars and Venus. Things could be different though. If Mars had a thicker atmosphere, its greenhouse effect could keep it warm enough for water and life.

Kepler-22b is 2.5 times as large across as the Earth and 15 times as massive. Pilots black out at 9 Gs, so you couldn't even stand up and stay alive on this planet. If it was as far from its own star as Mars is to the Sun then I would be much more optimistic. Unfortunately it's in the other direction. Not only is it more than double Earths size, it's closer to its sun as well. Not good. Kepler-22 is supposed to be slightly dimmer than our sun but I don't think its enough. A planet that big, that close to a star like ours, is going to be an oppresive smothering choking hell hole. (like the ideal government of the left)

Venus is a little smaller that the Earth but being so close to the Sun it has had a runaway greenhouse effect. It's too hot for any ocean. The atmosphere is a soupy poison. All the probes we've sent are now melted slag.

Atmospheres make a big difference. Mercury is not even close to being habitable but because of a quirk of its axial tilt part of Mercury is in perpetual darkness. Without any atmosphere at all, its been theorized that ice could form on Mercury. There isn't a single ice crystal on Venus because of its thick humid atmosphere. Not even at the poles.

It's very likely Kepler-22b is a super sized, super terrible, version of Venus. Its not an earth like planet. Not even close. When you look at the actual press release from NASA it says "scientists don't yet know if Kepler-22b has a predominantly rocky, gaseous or liquid composition." They have no idea if Kepler-22b is habitable or not. In fact Kepler-22b is just one of over 40 extra solar planets that might be habitable if they are very very lucky.

So how do we go from that to the hundreds of articles from so-called science journalists declaring the discovery of "Earth's Twin." Google it. Its amazing. They are like a school of fish. Each individual a dummy but they swim together. No wonder they are into collectives. Not an original thought to be found in the lot of them.

There is something directing the group think however. Its what I'll call Social Engineering License. You've heard of poetic license and artistic license? Artists and poets can break the rules of grammar or accepted practice to make a point or enhance meaning. I believe science journalists take queues from the PR departments at places like NASA or NOAA to bend the truth such that it influences general public thinking.

Social Engineering.

Lets look at an example close to home. The Toronto Star headline is "A new Earth? Eerily familiar planet ‘a phenomenal discovery’". The article makes many fantastical claims that are purely unreasonable speculation. The claims get the headlines. When you take skeptical position scientists, whatever the discipline, will then reply that they need more research. They need more money.

A related article in the same newspaper claims Kepler-22b has:

a comfy 21 C surface temperature;
a rocky surface;
an ocean;

Where does that come from? 21 Celsius eh? 600 light years out and the Toronto Star knows the surface temperature is 21 degrees C (with light showers expected later in the day). You can disagree like I have, but the skilled progressive will lead you into a discussion of climate, atmosphere, and the greenhouse effect.

It's fallen out of fashion but Venus' runaway greenhouse effect used to be one of the scary scenarios for a man-made runaway greenhouse effect. It was one of my favorites because it allows the skeptic to point out that the Earth has had both hotter global average temperatures than today and higher CO2 levels (sometimes during ice ages). If the greenhouse effect was going to runaway it would have done so already at many different opportunities in Earths natural history. The key difference between Venus and Earth, obvious to anyone but a eco-minded green priest, is that Venus is closer to the Sun. The Sun drives climate morons. -Directly and indirectly.

This is why science news is skewed to outlandish and often nonsensical claims. You have the scientists who want to ensure a steady flow of grant money on one side and you have journalists on the other side who aren't there to report but to influence and change for their social engineering ends. Both of them bend the truth for their own agenda. They tell a 'white lie' for a 'good cause.'

Social Engineering.

We see this Social Engineering License effect in things as harmless as astronomy. The Climategate and Climategate 2.0 emails explicitly show this effect in areas of science that have great social implications like Anthropogenic Global Warming. Climate Scientists are very political. Many of them want massive global taxes and global government to administer and enforce it. Science journalists concerned with Global Warming are on a moralistic mission to implement global socialism. Social Engineering white lies masquerade as science for political ends with the moral justification of saving the earth.

-Oh and NASA doesn't know if Kepler-22b is a rock, gas, ice or ocean planet, but they provide a picture of it. Would you like to buy a few acres of land there?

The CBC Plot Thickens

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:40:00 +0000

Uh-huh. Do you see what I be see? I knew it all along. It must be a conspiracy. Just look at those coconuts!

Vote in The Coprolite Awards for COP-17

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:49:00 +0000

Fossils are cool. I collect them. They are geology, biology and paleontology cast into a physical, often beautiful, artifact. The Royal Tyrrell Museum in Drumheller is a temple to my beliefs and a house of wonders and treasure.

Fossil Bone Bed in Dinosaur Park

I'm quite proud that Canada receives fossil awards. When you look at the eco-lobby that gives them out for ignoring them, it is quite a prize. It would be very disappointing if we didn't get at least one. A fossil award is something that every nation should strive for.

Make no mistake. Environmentalist are solely lobbyists for an earth cult. They produce nothing at all but complaints, propaganda and hyperbolic emotional fear campaigns. There is no pleasing them even when appeasing them. Money spent on these eco-lobby groups is utterly and ironically wasted. Their only solution is socialism, which is their motivation in the first place.

I do thank them for their cool awards however. In return I'd like to establish the Coprolite Awards at COP-17. A Coprolite is not a fossil. Coprolites are lithified poop. Like fossilized footprints they are not actual fossils. Coprolites are preserved prehistoric animal turds.

Coprolite: Ewww

What better metaphor for the eco-lobby than ancient lithified poop? Its perfect. Global Warming being the ultimate pile of outdated bull crap where eco-hypocrite crusaders retain their defecated shape and nothing of their original ideal. Fossilized crap has never in history deserved such recognition.

The Categories will be:

Grand Coprolite Nation: given to the Country that stands out for its righteous hand ringing and hypocrisy.
Coprolite-in-Chief: The top non-scientist who has made the most fantastical claims and money off of AGW.
Coprolite Wizard: The scientist who distinguishes themselves for activism, forgery, withholding data, and skewing results.
Coprolite Quisling: The politician who bows lowest to the eco-lobby.
Coprolite Cache: the stupidest and shrillest ENGO.
Tax Funded Coprolite Cache: The government organisation that spends the most tax money in order to raise the taxes of its citizens.

I'm open to ideas on other categories I may have missed. Perhaps a lifetime achievement coprolite.
I'm also open to nominations for each of the awards. Vote for each category on the left and leave any suggestions below. Put Durban in the dirt bin like all the other expensive hypocritical climate junkets.


Coprolite jewlery is not glamorous

A Basis for Atheist Conservative Partnership

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:17:00 +0000

The basis for atheist conservative cooperation is liberty. Core conservative values include Free Markets, Security and Defence, Personal Liberty, Nationalism, and the Rule of Law. Personal Freedom includes freedom of religion or lack thereof. The same values protect the rights of atheists as they do the rights of the faithful. We all want the same thing. Freedom.

There is no reason for any conflict between atheism and conservative values, even those of social conservatives. The faithful believe that rights and freedoms come from God directly. There is no government or even a religious official that can revoke the rights of a Human Being. Freedom is divine.

The thinking atheist, ones who take the time to think about the nature of freedom, knows that rights and freedoms are inherent to Human life. There is no government or scientist that can revoke the rights of a Human Being. Freedom is Human.

The theological and philosophical debate as to the existence of God should not have any bearing on policy or politics at all. The true God would never revoke the free will and divine rights of humans. A non-existent God will never be able revoke the free will and divine rights of humans. Effectively the atheist conservative and the conservative believer have the same position on liberty whether God exists or not.

The left wing view is that rights come from government. They replace God with government and submit to the dictates of men with power. A right can't be over ruled by definition. Rights are not rights if they are subject to the approval of others. Rights supersede laws, opinions or policy. The idea that rights come from government is internally inconsistent like so many ideas on the left.

The conflict between many atheists and conservatives also comes from the left. Too many atheists enjoy a feeling of superiority that enables them to belittle and insult believers. The main target of this branch of atheism is social conservatism. This has been the case since Marx called religion the "opiate of the masses." Extreme socialist regimes have adopted atheism primarily to take power from religions and to encourage the same sort of intolerant superiority that pervades the left today. Left wing atheists are tools of the left. They mobilize one group against the other to further their socialist agenda.

Left wing atheists typically ignore those believers who think the job of government is to enforce the social moors that come from religion. Take the blind leftist support of totalitarian Islamists over freedom loving Jews in the middle east as a prime example. Atheists are free in Israel while they can be murdered or executed in most of the middle east. What other word than 'tool' can be used to describe a left wing atheist. A person turned against themselves for no better reason than their political faction is allied against people they locally dislike.

Left wing atheists have been marshaled into war with social conservatives for a long time. Now is no different. Religion is not the enemy. Overbearing government is the enemy of all humanity. Conservative atheists have a responsibility to turn other atheists back to liberty through solid reasoning. They also have the responsibility to defuse the tension created by the left towards all atheists. Believers are good, hard working, intelligent and freedom loving people. They deserve respect even while we might respectfully disagree on the remote yet fundamental aspects of nature.

A excellent lecture on Ayn Rands Theory of Rights by Objectavist Craig Biddle can be viewed below. He has a corresponding essay that goes deeper into the ideas here.

Ayn Rand was a great atheist and philosopher who discovered and put into language what many atheists already believe but are unable to express. Religion has had thousands of years to refine their arguments while the atheist awakening is still rather new. Not enough time has been spent by atheists on the questions of rights and morality resulting in many minds lost to socialism.

Alberta is strong and free for now

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:26:00 +0000

Alberta has improved its economic freedom as of 2009 says a Fraser Institute report. Thanks to Obama the rest of North America has fallen, leaving Alberta in first place.

We even beat Rick Perry's Texas.

While I'm sure the Redford government is clinking champagne glasses and patting backs over this, all I can do is face palm. Why? Because this is it. Alberta is now (or was in '09) the best part of the best part of the world. There is no grass that is greener anywhere.

The Author of the report said "the biggest thing is that the United States’ jurisdictions have been trending down." It's as if we are the flotsam left after a great ship sank. I'm happy for Alberta but sad for the ship, sad for the world.

The Redford government days ago floated the idea of a provincial sales tax. Part of the consideration for economic freedom is taxation. Higher taxes allow bigger governments, which would negatively impact our standing on this important measure.

It is clear that Allison Redford brings the wrong kind of change to Alberta. -The change that brought down the western world. They aren't just resting on their laurels, they are actively working to discard them. Redford had nothing but praise for Ontario's McGuinty policies last week which scores 49th out of 60 on the economic freedom index. It's those policies that are currently wrecking the economy of central Canada. It's McGuinty's policy that has driven them into 'have-not' status.

Many people, including myself, chose Alberta as their home for precisely the reasons that Alberta won the top spot in the economic freedom report. You could turn this report upside down and say that Alberta scores last in socialism (thank goodness).

The Redford PCs best ideas are about increasing government scope. Socialism. They don't care if we beat Delaware by a little or a lot. They don't care about our economic freedom at all. For them its about short term power, and they plan to bribe us with our own money to keep it.

Wildrose does care about personal and economic freedom. Wildrose does not plan to top the freedom index by watching everyone else lose theirs. Leadership of the free world may have fallen into our lap by default, but it won't stay there by overspending like a Red Tory. Alberta should be looking at ways to enhance our economic freedom and the Wildrose Party are the only ones able to do this.

F-bombs and stuff

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:35:00 +0000

So Putz Martin tweeted some foul language. There should be some conduct unbecoming of an elected official bylaw I suppose but why give parliament the excuse to commission a gold plated swear jar?

It just shows what we all knew about the pond scum already. Putz Martin is a classless douchbag, about as smart as a bag of hammers with about half the character. Nobody is surprised, but we sure like to talk about it.

I learned a long time ago. Don't put anything in writing you don't want anyone to see.

Back in grade 5 I thought it would be funny to write a juvenile parody of Twas the night before Christmas. It made me laugh. My teacher, a very Christian man involved with the Knights of Columbus, did not appreciate my humor at all. I think we were asked to write a Christmas poem.

Anyway, I got an F and letter home. The F was for funny as far as I was concerned. I could care less.

The letter home though was very very unfunny.

My Father never hit me. Mom would break wooden spoons over my insolent bum. Dad though used to say "if you ever make me mad enough to hit you, you'll be sorry." I believed him. I never crossed that line, but looking back I suppose he didn't either.

This time though Dad was very upset. It wasn't about blasphemy or vulgarity or making a farce out of my teacher's holy assignment. That was Mr. KofC's problem. It was hard evidence that I was an idiot. Undeniable. My Dad made it very clear that I was a stupid idiot fool. He had the physical proof by my own hand with my own signature. I could only agree.

I've taken this lesson to heart. I swear and curse as much as the next guy, but I will never publicly lower myself to writing that's fit only for a bathroom stall. I'm better than that. My readers should be proud to admit they've graced my site. (thank you reader)

People like Bill Maher think cussing is some kind of high art. Making your point as strongly as you feel it without resorting to sexual or excretory ultra cliches is the real challenge. Common language is common and because its common its opposite of any kind of talent or skill.

Putz Martin's twitter account is nothing but a bathroom stall. An Occupy bathroom stall provided by hardworking taxpayers to people who would otherwise defecate in the street like animals. A filthy place, only to be visited if inescapably necessary. That's Pat Martin, member for Winnipeg Center.. It suits him well.

Redford and McGuinty: peas in a pod

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:17:00 +0000

Awe aren't they cute? Just look at this picture.

Two Liberal politicians chatting by the fire. Tax money can conveniently go up in flames any time they choose. It's good to be Premier.

Alison Redford went to Ontario. She went there to learn a few tricks from the master. The master being the same guy who sent ministers to Copenhagen to bad mouth Alberta and generally make Canada look bad. (link) You remember those dinks Quebec and Ontario sent right? All the same people are still in government.

All you have to do is say some progressive jargon and its all water under the bridge.

"We are a mosaic of peoples, regions and interests and we have always celebrated this diversity." (link) Wow huh? Steyn's leftist keywords uttered by our own Premier. It really is a Liberal government we've got here. She even spoke of a "National Energy Strategy." Because one National Energy Program wasn't enough.

I said before that Redford belonged in Ontario and there she is rubbing elbows with the biggest failure since Bob Rae.

When you have a permanent deficit, you are a failure. You are taxing the future when you spend more than you earn. There is no magic in this. There is no flowery progressive platitudes that are going change this. There is no amount of 'coming together to establish a dialog in the cultural mosaic spirit to celebrate diversity' that is going to change the laws of mathematics so you can spend more than you earn forever. Something has got to give. All over Canada, we are sick of being the ones giving it up all the time.

Voters know this, even if politicians don't.

My one and only face to face run-in with Joe Clark

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:28:00 +0000

Joe Clark! That proud old progressive wind bag who couldn't hold a minority parliament together for more than 9 months and actually sided with the Liberal Party over the Reform Party. The template Red Tory and benefactor, mentor and inspiration to Alison Redford.

We only met once and I don't care to repeat the encounter.

It was cold. So very cold that day. Liberals were in power. The West was out. Klein was in.

Downtown Calgary was a deserted windswept canyon of polished stone and glass. I was a broke student, on my way to the Y to workout.

I exited the LRT and was immediately blasted with blowing -40 Celsius. I'm not really into windchill. It just seems like hyperbole to me. "Holy jump'n its -80 C with windchill!" That really means nothing to me. Wind changes and is especially unpredictable amid the tall buildings. I want to know the real temperature. I expect wind. Its winter. How cold would it be if I hid in a car without the engine running? That's what the daily "High" is all about. Its the best temperature you can expect for the day.

Any temperature below -20 is kind of irrelevant. -20 or -40 is just too damn cold. A high of -40 will literally freeze your eyelids shut. When you make it back indoors, the vitreous fluid in your eyeballs stays cold for a few minutes. It's an odd feeling. Your circulatory system regulates your body temperature among other things but it doesn't interact with your vitreous humor. You can't feel your vitreous humor, its just a space with fluid in it. You can feel the heat lost form the little blood vessels all around your eye. Once your fingers and toes stop burning, a perceptive person will realize their eyes are cold.

There I was in that kind of weather. I started down 3rd street. The Y was 7 blocks away. I walked the first block and then I started running. It was a simple decision, less time in the cold, more heat generated by the activity, and I was heading to the gym for exercise anyway.

I'm running along, breathing hard, tears streaming down my face. Eyelids sticking shut with every blink. I stop at a stop light on 4th Avenue. I know. I'm a well trained citizen.

Standing there at the light with his wife (I presume) and decked in fine furs was Joe Clark. There was Joe Clark sneering at me.

'F--k you,' I thought and jaywalked (ran) across the road then all the way to the gym.

Not much of a meeting, but I'll never forget it. Whenever I think of Joe Clark or progressives in general I see that sneering elite in furs judging me.

Smashing the progressive disease is not only good for the country and good for the whole world. It's good for all of us as individuals. Had I never run into Joe Clark, I would still do my best to stamp out progressive attitudes and ideas wherever their ugly specter rises. There is a personal satisfaction in it for me however.


Vitriolic Humour

Those professional politicians that kiss babies for the camera's but sneer at random people on the street, their day is gone. Their wordy nap-inducing pacifying verbal hypnosis is utterly meaningless. We know them now. We can spot progressives; smell them from around the corner before they even come into view. What are these sneering progressive elites but Liberals who've convinced themselves they are too good for Liberals? They might be fine bankers or whatever, but snobs like these should never have the wheel of public office for long. Like a self serving taxi driver, they won't take us where we really want to go and leave us with a huge bill when its over.

Albertans are PST

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:00:00 +0000

Pissed off with Alberta's Progressive Party? You aren't the only one. Liepert floated the idea of a Provincial Sales Tax (PST) today. This isn't the first time either. We all know what the left wing party that governs Alberta is itching to raise taxes. They can't turn around without stepping in their own poop because they are full of it. Political speak for this sort of thing is a "trial balloon." Basically they dip their toes in water to see if they can swim.

Albertans do not want a PST. Albertans have already been humbled by this governments inefficiency compared to other provinces and its unprecedented deficit. Now they want a new tax.

How many public sector unions does Redford intend to buy off? Anyone with two or more brain cells to rub together can figure out that if the PC's hang on to power through the next election, we will get a PST. No two ways about it.

Danielle Smith asked us this morning: "What do you think of the Redford Tories proposal for a provincial sales tax?"

My Answer: "I think I want to knock every door in Alberta to tell them there is a way out."

You better believe it. I didn't move here so Ontario's disease could follow me. Not on my watch!

The next trial balloon will involve filling in the Alberta Badlands by levelling Alberta's Rocky Mountains I'm sure. Isn't that fair? Isn't that how progressives think after all? That's the PC way these days. We should all be made to write a $400 check to Premier Redford right now. Call it a Prosperity Penalty. Alberta advantage hah! Not with this dead weight in our provincial government.

Off the chart stupidity in Obama Nation

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:07:00 +0000

Obama is a total train wreck. Obama's incompetence strains the English language to find adequate the word to define it. Stupid? Idiotic? Moronic? Idealist? Timid? Wrong-headed? Clueless? Obama is all those things, but more so. It's not enough to call him stupid. The moron freezing his loser butt off in an open sewer that was once a city park tonight, that's stupid. Obama takes it to a whole other level.

This is the kind of stupidity that lends half a billion to negative cash flow companies like Solyndra for a flawed ideology at best, and/or to give heavy Obama campaign donor George Kaiser a bailout at worst. That bad loan was in turn loaned to the US with no realistic plan to pay for it. Some unborn tax payer was sold as a slave to Obama's political cronies.

Why does he and his administration need to think so hard about the Keystone XL pipeline? It's a "no brainer," said Prime Minister Stephen Harper, a man known for his wise strategic decisions. Obama's eco-nut base is so fickle that Obama is afraid to lose them in the upcoming election over this. He would stand to lose a lot of campaign money and a host of volunteers. The Keystone XL and its tens of thousands of permanent American jobs will have to wait until after the election. Those workers can go camp in a city park or something. The only thing important to Obama is campaign donations from the special interests that own him. They are the special interests that made him.

This campaign cash gain to Obama comes at the expense of real revenue at a time when the US needs it the most. The US deficit is 1.3 trillion! US Unemployment is at 9.1%!

I suppose he really does think Americans are stupid. Never mind Solyndra, Fast and Furious, Canadian oil indecision, snubbing friends, groveling to enemies, and the trillions spent with nothing to show for it. Nah. All America really needs is a slick 2012 election campaign and all will be well. Obama needs to continue to nap in the Oval Office and golf. That is all that really matters to the administration. It's not their money after all.

The leftards are right about America. America does suck. They should know, they did it. They are doing it. They, the left, is responsible for the hole America is in. Mark Steyn pointed out the on Sun News the other day that all this play money comes from China, and the US still gives millions in foreign aid back to China. What a deal! Take a bow progressives. You have really out done yourselves on that one.

America is insane, completely insane. Not Americans, the people, but the United States is crazy. Spending like there is no tomorrow and turning away good jobs. If a person acted like the US they would be locked up. Progressives have talked all the sense completely out of politics and pat themselves on the back for it. The entire western world is sick with this Progressive/Liberal/Socialist/Marxist disease we can aggregate as The Left.

Stupid can't begin to describe the Obama administration. The word is just too soft for the insanity unleashed by this community organizer and his pack of Marxists. This little rant started with my inability to concisely state the scale of the Obama administration's stupidity in one word, but I think I've found it. Obama is Leftist.

Occupy LOL Street

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:00:00 +0000

Happy Friday! As snow descends on Calgary in big beautiful conglomerate flakes, I thought I'd share some funny-but-true graphics I picked up from occupylolstreet.com.

This Venn diagram will help you understand what makes Occupy Wall Street tick. It wouldn't be so funny if it wasn't so true.

Next up. A typical occupy child of privilege.

hahaha! So good.... and true.

I've never been so happy to see snow! I hope our set of occupy wastrels are becoming well acquainted to life without fossil fuels. I've been winter camping. Its not as fun as it sounds. Its going to be a long cold winter my little numb skulls.

Today: Periods of snow. Amount 5 cm. Wind north 20 km/h becoming light this afternoon. Temperature steady near minus 9.
Tonight: Periods of snow ending near midnight then cloudy. Amount 2 cm. Low minus 10.

Halloween Book Review: World War Z

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:44:00 +0000

World War Z is a thoroughly enjoyable read. If you ever watched a Zombie Apocalypse film and wondered "what happened to the army?" This is that story and many others.

World War Z is probably the most hopeful horror book I have ever read. Its told from the perspective of survivors of the Zombie War who were being interviewed by a reconstituted UN. Its as horrifying as any zombie tale except you soon realize that every survivor story must have a happy ending. Happy enough anyway.

Its very realistic once you accept the idea of a virus that can reanimate infected dead and turn them into hungry flesh eating ghouls. They use everything from nuclear weapons to baseball bats but nothing stops the zombie hordes except geography and some very tough decisions. Read the book to find out how. I don't want to spoil it.

There is even a lot of Canadian content. One story was of an early encounter with zombies as told by a soldier with the PPCLI. Another tells of a family's early escape to Canada before "The Great Panic." This isn't special since there are tales from every part of the earth including a civil war as fought by Chinese submarines and the plight of astronauts stranded on the International Space Station.

Even the Joint Strike Fighter (F-35) makes an appearance at The Battle of Yonkers. Its stealth profile and surgical precision are useless against millions upon millions of undead walkers. The Battle of Yonkers is sure to become an instant legend when the movie comes out next year.

The Battle of Yonkers

IMDB reports that the film will star Brad Pitt. I'm not sure how they will adapt the book for the big screen. The oral history of many different viewpoints from around the world won't lend itself well to a movie. I'm hoping the director, budget and screenplay of the film will be as big as its main star.

In any case, World War Z is a fantastic read this Halloween.

A zombie outbreak is a useful exercise to help us think outside the box of a comfortable civilization. Zombies allow you to think about the worst case scenario without naming an enemy. You can laugh and joke about it without being that paranoid guy. There are elements of society that resemble the dirty brainless shuffling mobs who want to consume everything and contribute nothing. Some people identify with zombies (I identify some people as zombies) while others see themselves as survivors. Which are you? It's not going to happen of course, but you should be ready to preserve yourself and your family in the event of a catastrophe. It could be a tornado, a tsunami, a major industrial accident, disease, shortages, a crippling attack from a hostile state or even a revolution. Sometimes these things even come in groups as we saw in Japan. Are you ready for the apocalypse? Don't count on bureaucrats to save you.

Leftist Atheists on the Attack

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:54:00 +0000

I'm an atheist.

It's with some shame that I say this. The shame doesn't come from my non-belief, it comes from the behavior of some of the people and groups who share my non-belief.

Atheism is becoming more than a simple understanding that God doesn't exist. Atheism is being turned into an anti-religious movement. Somewhere, somehow, the atheist movement has picked up the iconoclastic fervor seen only in fundamentalist Islam today.

The group at the vanguard of this growing secular intolerance is the FFRF or the Freedom From Religion Foundation. I would support them if they were serious about actually freeing people trapped in a religion or some crazy sect. They don't go after cases of honour killings or institutionalized abuse, arranged marriages, forced polygamy, genital mutilation, sexual segregation, nothing worthy of real opposition. No. They want to protect my atheist eyes from seeing a religious symbol in public.

The latest victim of iconoclastic fury is directed at a statue of Jesus on a mountain in Montana. The Calgary Sun reports that it was erected in 1955 by World War II veterans who admired similar monuments in the old world. It's kept by the Knights of Columbus who have held a special lease for the memorial since 1953. The FFRF press release claims that its unconstitutional and urges readers to call the US Forest Service to thank them for not renewing the lease for that reason.

While I demand equal treatment under the law for atheists or any other type of believer, I do not subscribe to the idea that a statue can oppress me in any way. It was there before I was born. What right have I as an atheist to remove it? Its there. That's it. What are we the Taliban?

Must we erase everything from the past? Just because I don't believe doesn't mean I can remove the fact that there were war heroes who did believe. They made their mark and passed on. I'd like people a thousand years in the future to know who they were and how they thought.

I fail to understand why people get so bent out of shape about Christian symbols in particular. Could you imagine this selectively righteous group getting so worked up about a Buddha statue? The Calgary Zoo has a Ganesh statue that I quite like. When do you suppose these religious police will save the impressionable youth from the Hindu indoctrination? Its ridiculous on its face. Thousands of children pass that statue every year and I'll wager not a single child was compelled to Hinduism by it. Not a single atheist was offended by it either.

An atheist whizzing past a statue of Jesus on a ski hill is unacceptable to FFRF. Never did they think they required sensitivity training or something. Everyone must go out of their way not to offend poor atheists.

This organization the FFRF is afflicted with what I've come to perceive as Standard Leftist Archetype.

You see atheism doesn't necessarily dictate how an atheist group will conduct themselves. The underlying methodology and ideology is the same as any leftist group you will encounter. You can replace atheist with environmentalist, feminist, separatist, Islamist, anarchist,... you name it.

Key traits are intolerance, revisionism, self-loathing, and top down Stateist solutions to every problem. They are leftists. They are probably funded by leftists. This is the Standard Leftist Archetype to advance a cause. Each cause furthers the goal of systematically dismantling everything that made Western Civilization great.

Ayn Rand was atheist. Bill Maher is an atheist. The fundamental difference between them, inspiring or insulting respectively, is not their beliefs but their politics.

Its not atheism itself that is the problem. The left is the problem.

Can drones replace fighters? Should they?

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:33:00 +0000

The trouble with drones is also their main strength. They are remote control robots. -Expendable and obedient.

If Gaddafi had drones they would have bombed civilians as ordered. Libyan pilots famously defected to Malta when they were ordered to fire on their own citizens.

The Soviet Union may still exist today if it had a drone air force. At the climax of the 1991 coup, when the Red Army and the KGB usurped the Communist Party's Premier, they ordered the Air Force to bomb Moscow.* They refused. The USSR dissolved shortly after.

Drones would have bombed Moscow. They make no moral distinction between targets. A Human pilot can rebel against insane orders, even if the orders are perfectly legitimate. Drones can't even distinguish between legitimate or illegitimate orders let alone make moral judgements on them.

Last week it was reported that a stubborn virus had infected the ground control station at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada. No matter what they do they havn't been able to wipe it off. The report suggests that it's a simple keylogger virus that records keystrokes. It could have conceivably been much worse however.

The Stuxnet virus that attacked the Iranian nuclear weapons program actually took control of centrifuges that were being used to refine weapons grade Uranium. The ingenious virus subverted the display screens of the centrifuges so that the operators had no idea what was happening. The virus then set the centrifuges to destroy themselves by spinning out of control.

Iran coincidentally has its own drone program. Like the rogue centrifuges, a drone will simply do whatever it's commanded, be it virus or human, friend or foe.

There are other limitations too. Drones are primarily suited to asymmetrical warfare. Insurgents and Jihadis will not have surface to air missiles or viruses of their own as of yet. They can't jam the signal to the drone with noise or knock out the signal source either. An advanced hostile state may have these capabilities.

Some suggest that drones could be a viable alternative to the F-35. This is not a serious suggestion. It would be like suggesting that a torpedo, a sophisticated remote controlled drone-like submarine, could replace a ship. No.

This is why a drone fleet will always have a support role that augments real fighter jets with real on-board pilots. Drones are merely tools and cannot replace fighter jets or bombers as the mainstay of a serious Air Force. Anyone who thinks this simply hasn't thought it through or is making this suggestion for political reasons.

*I'm not able to locate an online reference for this but I saw it on a Frontline documentary about the fall of the USSR years ago.

Alberta PC Cabinet Upsized

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:01:00 +0000

We'll take this order 'to go' please. Premier Redford has picked her cabinet and it is a whopper. 21 stale buns will occupy the cabinet chairs around Redford's newly purchased throne. The Burger Queen has change on the menu but this is no diet plan. Canada's fattest provincial government is sitting down to an all-you-can-eat taxpayer buffet.

Wildrose has already committed to a small and efficient 16 member cabinet. 40 Reasons to Vote Wildrose #12 aims to trim the fat from cabinet. Shrinking the size of government starts at the top.

Even ousted Ed had a 19 person cabinet at first. You don't shrink government by growing it. I don't think that was ever priority before or after Redford's coronation. The priority we see here is patronage and payoffs. Is your Alberta government and its ministries run in your interests or in the interest of the PC party?

In case you missed it

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:04:00 +0000

Watch the entire Bloomberg GOP Debate commercial free. Its about 95 minutes and they talk about the OWS (owes?) protests right at the beginning. They seem pretty cheerful!
(Thanks to TheRightScoop)

Would the real Tea Party please stand up?

noreply@blogger.com (Alex) — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:34:00 +0000

With all the hoopla about Occupy Wall Street and its lesser incarnations, I'd like to hear form the Tea Party.

Are you with Occupy Wall Street or not? I suspect you are with some of what they are saying now that people are listening (and laughing). I can't imagine the Tea Party would support Bailouts for Bonuses to the banks who caused the 2008 mess.

I would imagine, I must imagine since I'm not the Tea Party and can only presume what they would think, that Tea Party would have let the bad banks fail.

The Occupy Wall Street types don't seem to take issue with the monster bailout itself but with the failure of Justice to prosecute those responsible. Occupy Wall Street would happily nationalize all the corporations and jail all the CEO's because deep down they think capitalism is exploitation. The usual Marxist bunk.

The Occupy Wall Street kids, or "Anarchists for Big Government," rightly deserve a skeptical analysis and even derision where appropriate. Many of their supporters have begun to answer serious questions with statements like: "aren't these Tea baggers? They are protesting their tax money going to the financial sector without consequence...isn't that the point to the Tea party?"

Or try this one: "I'm enjoying the double standards Conservatives display with their attitude towards Occupy Wallstreet protests vs. Tea Bagger protests."

Those are quotes off my Facebook page.

Have you ever heard of Tea Party activists urinating on police cars, getting arrested by the hundreds and attempting to storm museums? Has the Tea Party ever called for the end of capitalism?

I've heard the Tea Party accused of many things by people who call them "Tea Baggers." What comes to mind most readily? Racists.

Notice all the children, tucked in shirts and grey hair? Take a look at Occupy Wall Street again.
Anyone against Obama is a racist. I'm sure you've come across this if you follow the Tea Party. The Tea Party get's slapped with racist slurs from day one while Occupy Wall Street is openly anti-semetic.

We know all about double standards. The left is one big double standard enabled by partizan calculation on one hand and plain ignorance on the other.

What say you Tea Party? Are you really the same as the Occupy Wall Street thing? Speak up please, because if you don't others will on your behalf.