Never judge a book by its cover and never judge the speed of a Formula 1 car by its looks. That’s how the old saying goes, doesn’t it? Something like that, anyway.

Which brings us to the annual cover-throwing, bulb-flashing cricus of pre-season car launches. McLaren were the first major team to unveil their 2012 car today, and with it a first glimpse of what we can expect in terms of aesthetics from the front runners. One that they hope will bring with it the constructors’ title and another drivers’ crown for either Lewis Hamilton or Jenson Button.

Thankfully, it turns out the car is not quite as bulky and ugly as the Caterham, which was launched last week to a few groans, and appears more in the mould of the 2011 model. Changes have been made to the side pods because of this year’s blown diffuser ban, but apart from a few other exterior minor tweaks, that’s about it.

Disappointed? People shouldn’t be, according to McLaren’s technical director Paddy Lowe, because the more notable changes cannot be seen from the outside.

“This car in many ways looks quite similar but underneath [there is] a great deal of change.  Every single part has been assessed, optimised for weight, stiffness, performance in any other respect,” he said at the launch.

“And when you add all of that up you get a car that’s net quicker, that’s the name of the game. So in every area the teams are tasked to find that one per cent, two per cent because we’re looking for that total.”

For the moment, then, all we can do is judge it by looks. And if you compare it to the Caterham, which has a front nose more akin to Steve Bruce, McLaren’s latest number is an  Angelina Jolie.

Red Bull and Ferrari are to unveil theirs over the next week ahead of testing as we get an early idea as to who is going to be the team to beat in 2012.

While it is about beauty now, we’ll soon see who has the brains as well. And because of that, March cannot come around soon enough.

His cynicism that David Beckham and Ryan Giggs could be included in the Olympics football squad just to help bump up ticket sales may be, of course, very well placed. But does the country really care that two footballing heroes could step out for Great Britain just because of their footballing history?

Surely not. Though Giggs’ private life became one of the off-field talking points of 2011 – even surpassing some of the tripe that Fifa president Sepp Blatter came out with – his on-pitch reputation remains unblemished. A wizardry winger and one of the greatest of his generation who became the most decorated British footballer of all time, thrown in with more than two decades of service to one club.

Yes, it is a shame that Giggs has never played in an international tournament, so in a competition that few care too much about (it’s not the Euros or World Cup), why can’t he be thrown in?

He still plays Premier League football at one of the country’s top clubs. I’m sure there are better players that could be used now, but he is not so far off the radar that he should be immediately discounted.

And the same goes for Beckham, England’s most capped outfield player ever. While many will argue just where he ranks in the list of great Premier League and international midfielders (not near the top of either), the man is a footballing icon who deserves to bow out of British football on a high.

Of course, cynicism points in the direction of Golden Balls’ role as an Olympic ambassador – somebody who can bring in crowds (and therefore money) in what would otherwise be a semi-watched football tournament.

But whether this is true or not, Great Britain could do far worse than give these two footballers one final international competition (the last in the case of Beckham, first and last for Giggs) to almost wave goodbye.

Barclay may be right about the motives, but who cares? Both should have their moment for Great Britain. Euro 2012 is the competition to take seriously this summer.

Football is having one of its worst seasons of controversy, with allegations of on and off-field racial remarks and alarming use of hand gestures by the crowd for any opponent daring to, for example, go and take a corner or a throw in. Of course, this kind of thing has happened in the past. It’s nothing new. Yet it is a great shame, especially in the case of alleged racism, that behaviour such as this has returned as great progress has been made in football over the last couple of decades.

Why on Earth does it take place on the terraces, though? My memories of standing on the concrete steps of football grounds as a youngster are filled with humour, pickled onions and people having a good time regardless of the result. Maybe it was worse than that and time has erased any thoughts of abuse, though I suspect this isn’t the case.

But generally, getting under the skin of opponents – both in the terraces and the players lined up against yours – was done through wit. How can I make fun of somebody in good jest? Targeting, for example, Jason Lee’s haircut (who remembers “he’s got a pineapple, on his head”?) instead of aiming a mouth full of expletives in his direction.

Now, though, abuse is commonplace. Apparently, there’s nothing like getting at an opponent by shaking a first or waving a couple of fingers at them.

So it was with great delight that I was given a copy of Who are ya? Football’s best ever chants compiled by Gershon Portnoi. Some 175 pages of wit and good humour, a bible for some of the best-written chants and songs from up and down the country over the years.

A reminder, too, that football does not need to resort to some of the ridiculous comments thrown the way of players these days.

Take this one, for example, about the inadequacy of Djimi Traore sung to the tune of Blame it on the Boogie by The Jackson Five:

Don’t blame it on the Biscan,

Don’t blame it on the Hamann,

Don’t blame it on the Finnan,

Blame it on Traore.

He just can’t, he just can’t, he just can’t control his feet.

Or perhaps this tongue-in-cheek look of Alex Hleb from Arsenal fans:

Alex Hleb, woah-oh,

Alex Hleb, woah-oh,

He came from Belarus,

To sell cheap fags and booze.

Many, many more examples – indeed, from around the world – are featured in the book and display football in a slightly better light.

These current problems are snowballing. Players have a responsibility as well to improve their own on-field behaviour, but it does not give fans the right to say or do what they want. Let’s hope we’re not closing in on another Eric Cantona outburst, but could instead still return towards the glory days of wit on our terraces.

As this book shows, British football fans can be among the best at it.

Follow me – @benjamin_curtis

Team GB is in safe hands for next year’s Olympic Games after Stuart Pearce and Hope Powell were named head coaches for the men’s and women’s football teams respectively by the Football Association.

In a tournament that will see all-bar-three of the Great Britain players under the age of 23, it is right that Pearce is in charge.

Four reasonable years as England’s under-21 boss, which – this summer aside – has seen tournament success and only five defeats in 41 games. Additionally, he represented his country 78 times and was a part of the Euro ‘96 tournament held in England.

Speaking about his appointment, Pearce said he is “extremely proud to have this opportunity”.

“I was fortunate to be part of Euro ‘96, so I know how special it can be to play for your country on home soil at a major tournament,” he explained.

“I’m sure this group of players will relish being part of not only a huge tournament in this country, but a unique one competing together and representing the UK.”

Just as deserving is Powell, who has led England’s women team for a remarkable 13 years and continues to play a huge part in promoting the sport. She believes rightly that exposure from the London 2012 Olympics can help boost the popularity of the women’s game like it did in Euro 2005.

With both managers having knowledge of tournaments hosted in England – and their years of coaching experience – Great Britain certainly has a good chance of success.

Now, all eyes turn to team selection. Who will Pearce pick from the other Great Britain football associations?

And, biggest of all, will David Beckham be given a chance to end his international career in style? A gold medal for golden balls would be a fitting end for England’s most-capped outfield player of all time.

Follow me @benjamin_curtis

Many will point to the excellent car he’s had as the main reason for triumph. Clearly it is important, but Vettel has this incredible talent that puts him ahead of the rest of the field. His obsession with picking up pole positions and even fastest laps drives him to a higher level. The daring move against Button at the beginning of last weekend’s Japan Grand Prix shows a sign of ruthlessness.

Crucially, his ability to pull out a faster lap under pressure – almost at the click of a finger – is mesmiring. He has dominated from start to finish in a fashion not seen since Michael Schumacher and pulls away from the pack with so much ease it is as if he is racing a series of milk floats. While Damon Hill argues that Vettel will struggle to beat his fellow countryman’s record of seven world titles, I believe he can.

Despite all this, Button has been quite exceptional himself this season. He is driving even better than at any point in his career – including that 2009 title win – and appears to be getting the better of teammate Lewis Hamilton.

And while this season may be over in terms of winning the championship, the silver medal is very much up for grabs. When you’re battling it out against someone of Vettel’s ability, there’s very little shame in a second-place finish.

Onto South Korea we go. Vettel will look to finish the season as he started it. Button will be looking for momentum ahead of next season. If anyone believes this season is heading for a quiet finish, think again.

In a week where the world witnessed one of the greatest-ever club sides make England’s champions look like 11 wax work models hired from Madam Tussauds for a Saturday night out in Wembley, it is somewhat galling to see a 75-year-old take centre stage waxing lyrical about the Fifa family.

Sepp Blatter, in his unique style, has completely overshadowed the achievements of Barcelona and the mesmerising display Pep Guardiola’s men unleashed on Manchester United last Saturday, instead brushing aside any suggestion that there are problems at Fifa and using the Champions League Final as an example of how world football is in good shape.

Far from being a case of sour grapes from the English FA and the media, Blatter and senior figures at Fifa are facing serious allegations that could, if proved to be correct, call into question their capability to run the sport.

Yet with the help of 172 spineless confederations voting against a motion to delay the presidential election, an unopposed Blatter will now take charge for a further four years which, if the previous four are anything to go by (absence of goal-line technology, Qatar 2022 reasoning), could be detrimental to the credibility of football.

Even though he faced no competition yesterday, Blatter couldn’t have done it without victory in the morning vote on whether to delay the presidential election. That only 34 nations voted to delay the election or not take sides is quite incredible.

As the old proverb goes, clever men are often employed by fools. Sadly for football, Fifa seems to be riddled with them.

However, the FA’s case has not been helped by pressing ahead with the 2018 World Cup bid knowing that there were deep-rooted problems in Fifa. Though a lot of effort had been put into organising the bid, all of the talk coming out of the FA’s headquarters would hold greater strength now had we pulled out before.

Is this in hindsight? Of course not. The first look of 2018 and 2022 voting taking place at the same time should have been a sign of things to come. The timing of BBC’s Panorama investigation was widely criticised at the time but now the contents form part of the argument against Fifa. Allegations were made even before the 2018 voting commenced.

Now the FA and English football find themselves in the doghouse, set to be snubbed for the foreseeable future. Instead of licking its wounds, the FA must now challenge Blatter and Fifa through strong campaigning and leadership – something that has been lacking until the last week.

The importance of change should not be understated. Football must be remembered for the jaw-dropping performances from the likes of Barcelona and not the jaw-dropping performances from an unopposed president in charge of a failing organisation.

Harold Camping believes that the world will begin to end tomorrow and will be destroyed completely five months later, over-shadowing (assuming we still have sun, Old Trafford and Jamie Redknapp’s wardrobe) Survival Sunday. It is the second ‘Rapture’ (as it is known in the doomsday-prophesier business) Mr Camping has predicted after the universe was spared from his guessing back in the mid-1990s; assuming the world pulls through, Wigan, Blackpool, Birmingham, Wolves and Blackburn will be looking for a sparing of their own a day later.

Having done a little survial predicting myself, thanks to the BBC predictor, my bottom six will finish as follows:

Wolves look good to beat Blackburn at Molineux to secure their top-flight status, while Steve Kean should scrape through. Wigan meanwhile have a difficult game at Stoke, who could still be hurting from two defeats against Manchester City in under a week. The possible absences of Matthew Etherington and Jermaine Pennant may blunt Stoke’s creativity, though Tony Pulis is confident of both playing a part. While Stoke limp towards the end, Wigan will be in a confident mood after their win over bottom club West Ham last week.

Tottenham should have enough to beat Birmingham and fend off Liverpool for fifth. While Blackpool’s chances of getting anything from a second-string Manchester United side must, surely, be highly unlikely.

Maybe my predictions will be wide of the mark. But one thing is for certain: they’ll be a darn sight closer than Harold Camping’s.

Referees and their officials are so often vilified for making the wrong decision, regardless of whether they could see the incident, that it is often difficult not to feel slightly sorry for them. Take yesterday’s early offside in the Carling Cup final: Birmingham’s Lee Bowyer is played through, flagged offside and television replays show he was actually the opposite. Bowyer running one way at full tilt and an Arsenal defender walking the other way creates a difficult decision – sometimes it is given correctly, other times not. A team can only hope that these things even out and, though often it does not, especially when facing bigger teams, Birmingham snatched a late win and the wrong decision is confined to history.

Add in just shy of 90,000 people creating an atmosphere at the home of English football, while a further several million watch from their television sets and the pressure can get to anyone. Cup final day and plenty at stake.

Compare that to Mark Clattenburg’s surroundings on Saturday. The DW Stadium with a scattering of 18,000 people and an incident that was clearer than a split-second call. That Clattenburg decided to give a free-kick the way of Wigan when Wayne Rooney’s elbow landed on the cheek of James McCarthy shows he saw the incident. That Rooney was not even booked for raising his arm has to call into question the quality of Clattenburg as a referee.

But still, surely after two days of giving it some thought, tens of replays shown across a series of different shows, including in the offices at the FA, Rooney will face up to his actions. Not one bit.

Aside from the injustice that Rooney gets away with violent conduct, the words of Sir Alex Ferguson and assistant Mike Phelan were equally remarkable. Phelan spoke of a “witch-hunt” against Rooney, while Sir Alex said the press “will raise a campaign to get him hung or electrocuted”.

Combined, the words of Sir Alex Ferguson and the inaction of the FA set a tone that needs to be eradicated. Footballers must act as role models and anyone stepping out of line must be brought to justice.

Rooney has evaded discipline. Now will the FA have the strength to stand up to Ferguson? Most likely he will get away scot-free.

Follow me on Twitter – @benjamin_curtis

Where to start? Sir Alex believes that a winter break should precede a weekend of cup football and so it should. Not only does this give players a break – and therefore reduces the risk of injury – but also gives fans a chance to recuperate financially and re-energise  their love for the game. Absence makes the heart grow fonder, and all that.

With this in mind, how can a winter break improve the FA Cup? Top teams are more likely to use their best players instead of using a cup weekend for resting them. For fans, all attention will be on cup football instead of viewing it as a detour from the Premier League.

I believe it should go further still and result in two or three straight weeks of cup football. Though logistics may be a stumbling block,  a month of FA Cup football (Rounds 3 to 5, with a week to allow for postponements) would focus all eyes on the cup and take away the stigma it has as a distraction from league football. At the very least, rounds should be brought closer together to create a storyline instead of leaving people struggling to remember what went on in previous games.

Other measures that need to come in include moving semi-finals away from Wembley (regardless of financial repurcussions for the FA)  and ensuring every team is playing in the same round over a weekend. That two games are still going through replays in the last two days, regardless of fixture list pile-ups, is simply ridiculous and ruins the event.

Additionally:

• Replays should be kept – vital financial benefit for smaller clubs.
• Seedings should not be introduced as every team should be equal in the draw.
• Draws could be made before the action begins, providing greater excitement (already done in part: today’s draw has been made before Leyton Orient v Arsenal)
• Highlights on earlier in the evening

The ideas above are just that – ideas. Sir Alex Ferguson’s comments should lead to more debate on the topic, as keeping the status quo will mean more half-empty stadia, third-rate team selections and viewing figures continuing to fall. We owe it to the history of the FA Cup that will provide it with a future.

This case represented an opportunity for the ICC to send out a strong message to everyone involved in cricket: anyone taking money to perform differently in a game will be caught out, and will be severely punished. Instead, the door has been left ajar for players of the future to risk a few years of their career when a zero-tolerance approach would have made it quite clear that fixing of any level will not stand.

One of the three tribunal judges appointed by the ICC, Sharad Rao, defended the length of bans by saying that “this was spot-fixing not match-fixing and it did not affect the outcome of any game”. Wrong. Whether it be one ball or the result of a game, it deceives those paying to watch. It makes a mockery of team mates and others that have spent all of their lives training, playing and dedicating themselves to being the best. It brings shame on the country they are representing and it brings shame on a sport that has always competed against football for the world’s attention.

The ICC could have put cricket through the dry cleaners this week, but instead opted for a two-minute hand wash. The tainted trio will be out of the game for a number of years; cricket may have missed the chance to ensure that fixing serves a life ban of its own.