<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510</id><updated>2009-07-10T08:21:01.367-07:00</updated><title type="text">SRN Articles</title><subtitle type="html" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/savetheroyalnavy.xml" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>9</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SrnArticles" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-4641226351817945613</id><published>2009-04-20T03:40:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-22T03:03:31.492-07:00</updated><title type="text">10 reasons why the state of the Royal Navy should matter to YOU</title><summary type="text"> 1. Protecting ships that carry the food you eat, the stuff you buy and the fuel you need. 
Most of the oil used by the UK arrives by sea. 
Global maritime trade relies on the free and lawful use of the sea. The
UK is an island nation and most of the food and goods you buy in the shops has
arrived from overseas on a ship.
The same goes for the oil that powers your car (and just about every kind </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/4641226351817945613/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=4641226351817945613&amp;isPopup=true" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/4641226351817945613" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/4641226351817945613" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2009/04/10-reasons-why-state-of-royal-navy.html" title="10 reasons why the state of the Royal Navy should matter to YOU" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-2504160859137152313</id><published>2008-12-16T03:03:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-16T08:49:13.238-08:00</updated><title type="text">A Vision of the future</title><summary type="text">

It's 2038. HMS Indefensible has been handed over to the Royal Navy...




Today in a grand ceremony at Portsmouth dockyard HMS Indefensible was commissioned into the Royal Navy. Described as the most stealthy warship in the world, she is now the only vessel in the Royal Navy and replaces 2 mothballed aircraft carriers, 6 destroyers and 4 submarines. Responding to criticism about the shrinking </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/2504160859137152313/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=2504160859137152313&amp;isPopup=true" title="20 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/2504160859137152313" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/2504160859137152313" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2008/12/vision-of-future.html" title="A Vision of the future" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">20</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-1675009133217306671</id><published>2008-01-16T13:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-03-07T05:10:48.774-08:00</updated><title type="text">Cut down  to the bone and vulnerable to shocks</title><summary type="text">In the recent leaked report from the MoD on the state of the RN it was stated the "Navy is vulnerable to unexpected shocks compared with 20 years ago" Compared to the high profile issues around warships, the 'teeth' of the navy, looking at the logistic 'tail' may seem less important but without the back-up of people, equipment and facilities, no navy can put ships to sea. 
"Today the RN is run by</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/1675009133217306671/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=1675009133217306671&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/1675009133217306671" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/1675009133217306671" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2008/01/stripped-to-bone-and-vulnerable-to.html" title="Cut down  to the bone and vulnerable to shocks" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-2720012739982866153</id><published>2007-12-04T04:19:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-04-01T08:43:50.661-07:00</updated><title type="text">Anti-submarine warfare - throwing away a vital capability</title><summary type="text">In typically restrained official words, the leaked report written by the MoD about the state of RN, states that  "Anti-submarine capability is now below a "prudent minimum level". In a world where  many countries are investing in new submarines, Britain, an island nation, is throwing away years of carefully acquired equipment, expertise and experience in hunting submarines. Two world wars </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/2720012739982866153/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=2720012739982866153&amp;isPopup=true" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/2720012739982866153" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/2720012739982866153" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2007/12/anti-submarine-warfare-throwing-away.html" title="Anti-submarine warfare - throwing away a vital capability" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-4203969452911173143</id><published>2007-11-20T08:38:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-11-24T13:29:29.603-08:00</updated><title type="text">Warships going cheap... Flogging off the nation's assets</title><summary type="text">The RN has roughly halved in strength since 1990. Many ships have been
paid off and this is to be expected as vessels become old, obsolete and
expensive to run. An average warship could expect to be retired after 25-30
years. What's surprising is the number of the relatively young warships
that have been disposed of. Either they are flogged off to foreign navies
(usually at prices well below </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/4203969452911173143/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=4203969452911173143&amp;isPopup=true" title="6 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/4203969452911173143" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/4203969452911173143" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2007/11/warships-going-cheap-flogging-off.html" title="Warships going cheap... Flogging off the nation's assets" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-5982069169003288420</id><published>2007-11-14T07:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-06-26T00:33:49.053-07:00</updated><title type="text">The new aircraft carriers - blessing or curse?</title><summary type="text">In July 2007 it was announced that the government had started ordering equipment needed for the 2 massive aircraft carriers for the RN. (work on the actual ships should start in 2009) At about 65,000 tons, they will be the largest ships ever built for the RN and their size means they
    will be built in pieces (or 'super blocks') at various locations and assembled (adjacent to Gordon Brown's </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/5982069169003288420/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=5982069169003288420&amp;isPopup=true" title="15 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/5982069169003288420" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/5982069169003288420" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2007/11/new-aicraft-carriers-blessing-or-curse.html" title="The new aircraft carriers - blessing or curse?" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">15</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-757082744530319754</id><published>2007-11-08T05:04:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-11T04:48:43.665-08:00</updated><title type="text">The great Eurofighter debacle - nemesis of the RN?</title><summary type="text">In 2007 the RAF finally took the first deliveries of the very pretty,
      very agile, and very expensive Eurofighter or Typhoon aircraft. This monstrously
      expensive white elephant is officially ‘just’ 4 years late
      although it has taken over 20 years to develop at cost the UK alone a whopping
      19 Billion pounds - nearly 3 times the original quoted cost of £7 Billion!
    Those
</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/757082744530319754/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=757082744530319754&amp;isPopup=true" title="11 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/757082744530319754" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/757082744530319754" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2007/11/great-eurofighter-debacle-nemesis-of-rn.html" title="The great Eurofighter debacle - nemesis of the RN?" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">11</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-7511175436865777712</id><published>2007-11-06T06:33:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2007-11-18T07:30:55.511-08:00</updated><title type="text">Looking past the government spin - The real truth about the RN</title><summary type="text">The great reality gap
      Every time the government is questioned about the decline in the size of
        the fleet they trot out the same old line about “This government
        has invested in the biggest shipbuilding programme for the RN for many
        years" (Tony Blair, May 2007).
        The truth is that while the shipyards are now relatively busy, since
        1997 when the current </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/7511175436865777712/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=7511175436865777712&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/7511175436865777712" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/7511175436865777712" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2007/11/looking-past-government-spin-real-truth.html" title="Looking past the government spin - The real truth about the RN" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1112192501337037510.post-1345061813780312042</id><published>2007-10-26T10:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-12-03T12:21:56.052-08:00</updated><title type="text">Royal Navy; why bother? Why not just spend it all on hospitals?</title><summary type="text">Unlike the first part of the last century when the population of Britain proudly followed the progress of their navy and understood how much their well being depended on it, today the majority of people have little idea of the state of the RN or even the point of a having a navy. Many just see the armed forces as an expensive irrelevance and think the money could better spent elsewhere. 
    In </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/1345061813780312042/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1112192501337037510&amp;postID=1345061813780312042&amp;isPopup=true" title="7 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/1345061813780312042" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1112192501337037510/posts/default/1345061813780312042" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/articles/2007/10/royal-navy-why-bother-why-not-just.html" title="Royal Navy; why bother? Why not just spend it all on hospitals?" /><author><name>Navy Lookout</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15653804159878860040</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11656661711827594556" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total></entry></feed>
