<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Property Law for the Startup Phase</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com</link>
	<description>The Crossroads of Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, Technology, and Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw" /><feedburner:info uri="startupintellectualpropertylaw" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Overview of the PCT “International” Patent Application</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/gNeZ82NphUg/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/overview-of-the-pct-international-patent-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description>Patents are granted on a country by country basis. If a company is considering &amp;#8220;international&amp;#8221; patent protection, that is to say patent applications in multiple countries, there are two primary approaches: 1. Filing patent applications on a country by country basis directly in the patent office of those countries &amp;#8211; This can present several concerns.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/gNeZ82NphUg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/overview-of-the-pct-international-patent-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/overview-of-the-pct-international-patent-application/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=overview-of-the-pct-international-patent-application</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Key Terms of a Patent License</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/pNzZtelU_-M/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/3-key-terms-of-a-patent-license/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! You&amp;#8217;ve filed your patent application. The next step is for the inventor to commercialize the newly created intellectual property. The three primary options are to completely assign the patent rights to another party, license the patent rights, or to manufacture, market, and sell the product disclosed in the patent application. Frequently, inventors wish to&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/pNzZtelU_-M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/3-key-terms-of-a-patent-license/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/3-key-terms-of-a-patent-license/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=3-key-terms-of-a-patent-license</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Misconception About First to File Provisions in Patent Act</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/k09EZCcAjCk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/misconception-about-first-to-file-provisions-in-patent-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=468</guid>
		<description>In receiving questions from clients and others, some incorrectly believe that the new first-to-file provisions of the recently passed patent legislation mean that the first party to file a patent application unconditionally has lawful rights in the patent application, even where a second party misappropriates or derives the intellectual party from the first party. This&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/k09EZCcAjCk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/misconception-about-first-to-file-provisions-in-patent-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/misconception-about-first-to-file-provisions-in-patent-act/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=misconception-about-first-to-file-provisions-in-patent-act</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Common Concerns with Expanding Business to the United States</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/h0JsJYaGVjk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/ten-common-concerns-with-doing-business-in-the-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=445</guid>
		<description>Ten Common Concerns with Doing Business in the United States&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/h0JsJYaGVjk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/ten-common-concerns-with-doing-business-in-the-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/ten-common-concerns-with-doing-business-in-the-united-states/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=ten-common-concerns-with-doing-business-in-the-united-states</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Website Terms of Service and Privacy Policies – More Than Law</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/KnMVsYczz64/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/website-terms-of-service-and-privacy-policies-%e2%80%93-more-than-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[term of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=409</guid>
		<description>Some companies simply copy and paste the terms of service and privacy policies. This can be a costly mistake. The terms of service (“TOS”) and privacy policies (“PP”) should reflect the combination of legal, business, marketing, and ethical concerns of the company. Facebook has received a lot of criticism of its privacy policies over the&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/KnMVsYczz64" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/website-terms-of-service-and-privacy-policies-%e2%80%93-more-than-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/website-terms-of-service-and-privacy-policies-%e2%80%93-more-than-law/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=website-terms-of-service-and-privacy-policies-%25e2%2580%2593-more-than-law</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark Protection and Control in Technology Matters</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/sqnQq_9PrVc/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/trademark-protection-and-control-in-technology-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/sqnQq_9PrVc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/trademark-protection-and-control-in-technology-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/trademark-protection-and-control-in-technology-matters/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=trademark-protection-and-control-in-technology-matters</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Startup IP, Investors, and Nondisclosures</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/RxFlcuJPk_Y/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/startups-investors-and-nondisclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=372</guid>
		<description>Frequently, in an intellectual property consultation with a startup team, we inventory and discuss the intellectual property involved in the business plan and the timing, cost, and strategy in protecting it. As some intellectual property rights can be impacted or misappropriated upon disclosure, the consultation turns towards upcoming disclosures of the proprietary elements of the&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/RxFlcuJPk_Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/startups-investors-and-nondisclosures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/startups-investors-and-nondisclosures/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=startups-investors-and-nondisclosures</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Governmental Sources for Inventor Prototyping and Manufacturing Assistance</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/rh9AdNImc6Y/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/governmental-sources-for-inventor-prototyping-and-manufacturing-assistance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description>Many small businesses need help with design and development of inventions at various stages. A startup may want a mockup or virtual prototype in order to pitch for funding. Later, the business may need a working prototype for further proof of concept. Then that prototype may need to be further refined for efficient manufacture. Thus&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/rh9AdNImc6Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/governmental-sources-for-inventor-prototyping-and-manufacturing-assistance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/governmental-sources-for-inventor-prototyping-and-manufacturing-assistance/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=governmental-sources-for-inventor-prototyping-and-manufacturing-assistance</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in the Startup Phase</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/rmgYTxW3Hsg/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/enforcing-intellectual-property-rights-in-the-startup-phase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description>Mission critical assets of a startup business can include its unique products and its branding. If either is usurped, the emerging business may not survive for long. Because of that, the small business must consider protecting those assets. A frequent discussion in the analysis of securing formal intellectual property rights is, of course, the value&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/rmgYTxW3Hsg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/enforcing-intellectual-property-rights-in-the-startup-phase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/enforcing-intellectual-property-rights-in-the-startup-phase/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=enforcing-intellectual-property-rights-in-the-startup-phase</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Free Sources for Possible Patent Licensees or Assignees</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/1PsxIhg2t3U/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/four-free-sources-for-possible-patent-licensees-or-assignees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description>Frequently inventors consider licensing or sale of their patent application or issued patent as the means for monetizing their intellectual property. One challenging step is to determine who might be interested in licensing or purchasing the patent rights. Determining potential licensees or assignees is a key step in developing the business plan. 1. Search Engines&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/1PsxIhg2t3U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/four-free-sources-for-possible-patent-licensees-or-assignees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/four-free-sources-for-possible-patent-licensees-or-assignees/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=four-free-sources-for-possible-patent-licensees-or-assignees</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Advantages of Monitoring Use of Your Trademarks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/opRqP3d37QM/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/two-advantages-of-monitoring-use-of-your-trademarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description>You&amp;#8217;ve probably read about the recent dispute between Best Buy, owner of the &amp;#8220;Geek Squad&amp;#8221; trademarks, and Father Luke Strand of Holy Family Catholic Church, (former?) owner of a VW Beetle adorned with a &amp;#8220;God Squad&amp;#8221; logo. One of the ways that Best Buy uses the Geek Squad trademark is in a logo form on&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/opRqP3d37QM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/two-advantages-of-monitoring-use-of-your-trademarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/two-advantages-of-monitoring-use-of-your-trademarks/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=two-advantages-of-monitoring-use-of-your-trademarks</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Myths Regarding Integrating Internet Data Into Applications</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/doTrSGbUGtk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/myths-regarding-integrating-internet-data-into-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 04:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=271</guid>
		<description>Lookin&amp;#8217; for information on a chemical, well there&amp;#8217;s a database for that. Looking for barcode information, well there&amp;#8217;s a database for that. Lookin&amp;#8217; for a local restaurant, &amp;#8230; you get the point. There is a lot of useful published data available on the internet in a convenient format. And there are lot of potential applications&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/doTrSGbUGtk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/myths-regarding-integrating-internet-data-into-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/myths-regarding-integrating-internet-data-into-applications/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=myths-regarding-integrating-internet-data-into-applications</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Key Terms in a Copyright License</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/U7Xs5IKb0L4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/3-key-terms-in-a-copyright-license/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description>Licensing is one method of commercializing copyrighted material. A license is an agreement which permits another (&amp;#8220;the licensee&amp;#8221;) to use the intellectual property of the owner (&amp;#8220;the licensor&amp;#8221;) in a certain manner, typically to sell products based on the intellectual property. A license can be a lengthy document with many options to negotiate, but three&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/U7Xs5IKb0L4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/3-key-terms-in-a-copyright-license/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/3-key-terms-in-a-copyright-license/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=3-key-terms-in-a-copyright-license</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Post Bilski Commentary For Software Startups</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/Vv0unnqAAYY/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/post-bilski-commentary-for-software-startups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business method patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description>By now you&amp;#8217;ve probably read about the &amp;#8220;Bilski&amp;#8221; decision recently released by the Supreme Court. Most of the coverage has been more focused on the policy aspects of the decision. This post focuses on where a software startup stands from a patent prosecution perspective in light of the decision. Stepping back for a moment, I&amp;#8217;d&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/Vv0unnqAAYY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/post-bilski-commentary-for-software-startups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/post-bilski-commentary-for-software-startups/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=post-bilski-commentary-for-software-startups</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Patents – An Overview of the Application Process</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/EnmFJMzX95s/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/patents-an-overview-of-the-application-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description>Frequently, the creator of an innovative new product or process may seek patent rights in order to exclude others from practicing the new product or process. The typical steps involved in the process of applying for a patent include: performing a search; preparing and filing  a patent application; and responding to rejections raised by the&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/EnmFJMzX95s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/patents-an-overview-of-the-application-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/patents-an-overview-of-the-application-process/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=patents-an-overview-of-the-application-process</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Startup Myth – First Come First Served for Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/0Jy1PbFMMEw/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/startup-myth-first-come-first-served-for-domain-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names and trademark rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description>Frequently I encounter businesses seeking to protect a brand name. In discussing the actions taken to date taken, owners frequently state that they have registered the domain name corresponding to the desired brand name. Frequently, they believe that their name is &amp;#8220;reserved&amp;#8221; or protected because they have already successfully reserved the domain name. It is&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/0Jy1PbFMMEw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/startup-myth-first-come-first-served-for-domain-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/startup-myth-first-come-first-served-for-domain-names/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=startup-myth-first-come-first-served-for-domain-names</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Startup Trademark Mistake – Failure to Research and Protect the Business Name</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/8fQjlOf2fCY/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/top-startup-trademark-mistake-%e2%80%93-failure-to-research-and-protect-the-business-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 20:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade name]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description>For emerging businesses, the business name is often synonymous to its branding. The business name may be used in the first product name, domain name, and advertising. A lot of time, money, and thought can be expended while creating that business name and building goodwill in it. An often overlooked aspect of this process is&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/8fQjlOf2fCY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/top-startup-trademark-mistake-%e2%80%93-failure-to-research-and-protect-the-business-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/top-startup-trademark-mistake-%e2%80%93-failure-to-research-and-protect-the-business-name/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=top-startup-trademark-mistake-%25e2%2580%2593-failure-to-research-and-protect-the-business-name</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Business Innovative Research Funding for Your Patentable Concept</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/zd_XJCAvCuY/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/small-business-innovative-research-funding-for-your-patentable-concept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBIR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description>Funding is a concern for many startups and small business creating new products.  The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) is a congressionally authorized, federal program that may be an option for funding for some of those businesses operating in select fields of technology. Two of the key driving policies of the program are to help&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/zd_XJCAvCuY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/small-business-innovative-research-funding-for-your-patentable-concept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/small-business-innovative-research-funding-for-your-patentable-concept/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=small-business-innovative-research-funding-for-your-patentable-concept</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Provisional Patent Applications Must Have Sufficient Technical Description</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/cDUetFFtR3o/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/provisional-patent-applications-must-have-sufficient-technical-description/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provisional patent applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provisional patent myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup myth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.startupipservices.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description>Frequently I hear the misstatement that one can just submit some notes and pictures of one&amp;#8217;s product in a provisional patent application. People think this is so because the application is &amp;#8220;informal&amp;#8221; and will not be examined by the patent office. Unfortunately, I have seen multiple situations where an entrepreneur had an inadequate disclosure because&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/cDUetFFtR3o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/provisional-patent-applications-must-have-sufficient-technical-description/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/provisional-patent-applications-must-have-sufficient-technical-description/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=provisional-patent-applications-must-have-sufficient-technical-description</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware: Patent Application Drafting Software</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/OODSdz9t5lk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/beware-patent-application-drafting-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do it your self patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent drafting software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description>I have reviewed a few situations where someone has sought direction after submitting a patent application which was created using patent application drafting software. Such software is typically marketed as allowing one to create quality patent applications without having any prior experience. Of the applications that I have reviewed where the applicant used such software,&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/OODSdz9t5lk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/beware-patent-application-drafting-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/beware-patent-application-drafting-software/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=beware-patent-application-drafting-software</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning: Inventor Assistance Companies</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/jiLd-NWQWBE/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/warning-inventor-assistance-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description>It is tough to sit across the desk from someone and tell them that I think someone took advantage of them, especially when that money could have been better used to help them with prototyping or other steps in their business plan. When I have spoken with people who have used inventor assistance outfits, it&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/jiLd-NWQWBE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/warning-inventor-assistance-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/warning-inventor-assistance-companies/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=warning-inventor-assistance-companies</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Factors in the Decision to File a Patent Application</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/LEkSIZMZC90/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/factors-in-the-decision-to-file-a-patent-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent timing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents as income]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description>When working with an inventor or  startup, a frequent question is whether it is financially prudent to proceed with a patent application. More often than not, I am not in a position to concisely answer the question, as the question may hinge more on economics than intellectual property. A patent search may shed some light&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/LEkSIZMZC90" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/factors-in-the-decision-to-file-a-patent-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/factors-in-the-decision-to-file-a-patent-application/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=factors-in-the-decision-to-file-a-patent-application</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep Your Startup’s Data Secret</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/vbMoTkfepl4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/keep-your-startups-data-secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protect confidential data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protect trade secret]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description>Recently I have talked with some scared startups. Scenario #1: Startup has its data on a flash drive and loses the flash drive. Scenario #2: Person has startup&amp;#8217;s data on a laptop and the laptop is stolen. The common theme to both scenarios is that they had unencrypted intellectual property on the drives, thus the&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/vbMoTkfepl4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/keep-your-startups-data-secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/keep-your-startups-data-secret/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=keep-your-startups-data-secret</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Intellectual Property Agreements – Write Them Down!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/pba8Hx2LUTw/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/written-intellectual-property-agreements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documenting agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property of failed startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description>I know that you have heard it a million times, but I have to say it once more: Write it down! Entity agreements (of which a portion may include intellectual property issues) for the startup should be written down.  By now, you&amp;#8217;ve read about the Crunchpad lawsuit, where its looks like the Crunchpad is no&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/pba8Hx2LUTw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/written-intellectual-property-agreements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/written-intellectual-property-agreements/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=written-intellectual-property-agreements</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Advantages of Trademark Registration for Startups</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~3/7c2v-XVEyak/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/advantages-of-trademark-registration-for-startups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description>Recently I had a discussion with a business who had been using a trademark since about 2004. Unfortunately, it had not registered the trademark. In the meantime, another business had started using a similar version of the mark and also had substantially completed the registration process. Thus the business was in a difficult situation. Sure,&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StartupIntellectualPropertyLaw/~4/7c2v-XVEyak" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/advantages-of-trademark-registration-for-startups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.StartupIPServices.com/archives/advantages-of-trademark-registration-for-startups/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=advantages-of-trademark-registration-for-startups</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

