<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Stats Chat</title>
	
	<link>http://www.statschat.org.nz</link>
	<description>"Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read and write." - H.G. Wells</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/StatsChat" /><feedburner:info uri="statschat" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Error and margin of error</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/Xw4La_vAi3U/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/25/error-and-margin-of-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lumley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6296</guid>
		<description>The British consumer magazine Which? ran a mystery-shopper investigation of UK pharmacies recently.  One of the topics they covered was homeopathic products, and in 13 of the 20 pharmacies where they asked about homeopathic remedies they got advice that violated the Royal Pharmaceutical Society guidelines for pharmacists.  An information sheet from the society says that [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/Xw4La_vAi3U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/25/error-and-margin-of-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/25/error-and-margin-of-error/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Bar charts are boring: a redesign</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/cBTAP-1I15s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/25/bar-charts-are-boring-a-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lumley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6291</guid>
		<description>At eagerpies, a redesign of a &amp;#8216;boring bar chart&amp;#8217; according to graphic design principles, with steps including “color exercises an undeniable psychological attraction… It captures and holds attention, multiplies the number of readers, assures better retention of the information and , in short, increases the scope of the message.” We can add further perspicacity to [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/cBTAP-1I15s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/25/bar-charts-are-boring-a-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/25/bar-charts-are-boring-a-redesign/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact checking is allowed</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/Z_sgHhwzmcM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/24/fact-checking-is-allowed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lumley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just look it up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6284</guid>
		<description>Stats New Zealand crime statistics:  criminal convictions in Asian, Middle Eastern, Latin American, African ethnicity are 4.4% of all convictions in the country as a whole, 13.7% in Auckland Population: for NZ as a whole, 10% Asian in 2006 (projected to rise to 13% in 2016).  For Auckland, 24% in 2006. So, people of Asian [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/Z_sgHhwzmcM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/24/fact-checking-is-allowed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/24/fact-checking-is-allowed/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>There’s more people than there used to be</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/WIVVSHdixo8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/24/theres-more-people-than-there-used-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lumley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Denominator?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6274</guid>
		<description>James Curran drew my attention to this graph, from daily-infographic (original source not given, but appears to be Reddit) showing weather-related deaths in the US The decrease in lightning deaths is impressive, but it doesn&amp;#8217;t look as though there is much decline in tornado deaths, and apparently an increase in flood deaths.  Why isn&amp;#8217;t forecasting helping [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/WIVVSHdixo8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/24/theres-more-people-than-there-used-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/24/theres-more-people-than-there-used-to-be/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Communicating with journalists</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/9zTuNwWSiOI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/23/communicating-with-journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lumley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6270</guid>
		<description>Two useful pieces, worth reading even if you are neither a scientist nor a science journalist. Ed Yong writes about what he is looking for when he asks scientists for comments on a research paper. Note that a lot of this boils down to you telling me something interesting that I couldn’t have predicted. That’s [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/9zTuNwWSiOI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/23/communicating-with-journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/23/communicating-with-journalists/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NRL Predictions, Round 11</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/VV7EfOBawfU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/nrl-predictions-round-11-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6268</guid>
		<description>Team Ratings for Round 11 Here are the team ratings prior to Round 11, along with the ratings at the start of the season. I have created a brief description of the method I use for predicting rugby games. Go to my Department home page to see this. Current Rating Rating at Season Start Difference [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/VV7EfOBawfU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/nrl-predictions-round-11-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/nrl-predictions-round-11-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Super 15 Predictions, Round 15</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/BlV4YmjwkBU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/super-15-predictions-round-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6266</guid>
		<description>Team Ratings for Round 15 This year the predictions have been slightly changed with the help of a student, Joshua Dale. The home ground advantage now is different when both teams are from the same country to when the teams are from different countries. The basic method is described on my Department home page. Here [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/BlV4YmjwkBU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/super-15-predictions-round-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/super-15-predictions-round-15/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Genetic screening for breast cancer</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/FbGQy_Zzbdg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/genetic-screening-for-breast-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lumley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6258</guid>
		<description>A round-up of some worthwhile links on Angelina Jolie and BRCA1 Angelina Jolie. My Medical Choice Hilda Bastian (evidence-based medicine specialist and cartoonist) Keeping Health Risks in Perspective When the Dramatic and Rare Goes Culturally Viral Melanie Tannenbaum (social psychology) Why It Matters That Jolie Wrote About Her Medical Choice David Gorski (surgical oncologist and curmudgeon) Angelina Jolie, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/FbGQy_Zzbdg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/genetic-screening-for-breast-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/22/genetic-screening-for-breast-cancer/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal highs: testing and voting</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/QEGf3vCG_Ac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/21/legal-highs-testing-and-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lumley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6254</guid>
		<description>The SPCA and similar groups have put together a petition asking for a ban on testing `legal highs&amp;#8217; on animals. The petition shows that at least 2% of New Zealand voters support the ban, which doesn&amp;#8217;t sound terribly impressive.  The problem is that petition-gathering is hard, so it&amp;#8217;s not really useful unless either you get [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/QEGf3vCG_Ac" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/21/legal-highs-testing-and-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/21/legal-highs-testing-and-voting/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How big an area was damaged by the Oklahoma tornado?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StatsChat/~3/WD-lS45zwzg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/21/how-big-an-area-was-damaged-by-the-oklahoma-tornado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Cunliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statschat.org.nz/?p=6245</guid>
		<description>One of the first things I want to understand when there&amp;#8217;s a natural disaster is the scale of it. Since I don&amp;#8217;t deal with square miles or square kilometres each day, I find it hard to comprehend what an estimate of 60 square miles of damage means. So, I used this tool to overlay 60 [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StatsChat/~4/WD-lS45zwzg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/21/how-big-an-area-was-damaged-by-the-oklahoma-tornado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.statschat.org.nz/2013/05/21/how-big-an-area-was-damaged-by-the-oklahoma-tornado/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
