<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Steve Young on Politics</title>
	
	<link>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Political Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SteveYoungOnPolitics" /><feedburner:info uri="steveyoungonpolitics" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Oh (My) God (2010). Starring Glenn Beck</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/iyySu4Bk6BQ/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/oh-my-god-2010-starring-glenn-beck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kind of Satire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “You give these answers to Reverend Big Mouth and you tell him that God says he’s a phony…Personally tell him to shut up.” God (George Burns) telling Jerry (John Denver) what to say to a particular evangelical preacher (Oh, God, 1977)
“I have a big fat mouth sometimes and I say things.” Glenn Beck (Fox News [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> “You give these answers to Reverend Big Mouth and you tell him that God says he’s a phony…Personally tell him to shut up.” God (George Burns) telling Jerry (John Denver) what to say to a particular evangelical preacher (Oh, God, 1977)</em></p>
<p><em>“I have a big fat mouth sometimes and I say things.” Glenn Beck (Fox News Sunday)</em></p>
<p>Screenwriter legend, Larry Gelbart, taught me that in the hands of a good comedy writer what is acceptable as gospel to so many can be hysterical satire to many more. Today I can only believe that he’s in heaven running lines with George Burns on how God would admonish Glenn Beck.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Oh (My) God (2010)</strong></p>
<p>Backstage at his Restoring Honor rally, Glenn Beck wipes his brow, accepting congratulations from admirers, some of whom were related to those who had actually read about Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech 47 years before.</p>
<p>Humming “The Battle Hymn of the Republic,” Beck retreats to the nearby bathroom to relieve himself.   As he washes his hands a black bathroom attendant hands him a towel.</p>
<p>Attendant: Mr. Beck, that was quite uplifting.</p>
<p>Beck: Pshaw. Only God Himself can be uplifting. I am not God. I am only the humble human being God has chosen to speak for him. </p>
<p>Beck pulls out a $25 Goldline coin.</p>
<p>Beck: Do you have change for a <span id="more-367"></span>hundred?</p>
<p>Attendant: It’s a $25 coin.</p>
<p>Beck: Yes, but I bought it for $75 and there’s a possibility with the volatile world economic situation, gold could be your best investment.</p>
<p>Attendant: That’s alright. I’m here to serve and I ask nothing in return other than your eternal gratitude.</p>
<p>Beck:  Deal. Hey, you’re black, right?</p>
<p>Attendant: I am as you see me.</p>
<p>Beck: Whatever. Would you mind coming out to the dais and standing behind me?  As pale as I am I tend to blend into the white steps of the memorial. It makes it harder for my followers to see me. I could use as much color as possible behind me </p>
<p>Attendant: Would you mind if I ask you a question first?</p>
<p>Beck: Go ahead. </p>
<p>Attendant: How do you know that it was God who has spoken to you?</p>
<p>Beck: Who do you think got those geese to come to my rally and do a fly over?</p>
<p>Attendant: My son.  Those geese didn’t come to your rally. They were leaving it.</p>
<p>Beck: And exactly how do you know that?</p>
<p>Attendant: Do you know why you never see geese grazing on dairy farm land?</p>
<p>Beck: Why?</p>
<p>Attendant: They’re allergic to bull shit.</p>
<p>Beck: And why is that?</p>
<p>Attendant: I made them that way.</p>
<p>Beck: What do you mean, “you made them that way”?</p>
<p>Attendant: Did you ever see “Bruce Almighty”?</p>
<p>Beck: You’re saying you’re Jim Carey?</p>
<p>Attendant: Guess again.</p>
<p>Beck: Wait a minute. You’re not telling me you’re God?</p>
<p>Attendant: That is for you to decide.</p>
<p>Beck: Yeah, right. And I guess you can prove it?</p>
<p>Attendant: You mean you want to see some kind of parlor trick?</p>
<p>Beck: You just want me to take your word?</p>
<p>Attendant: You seem to be okay with others taking your word. Are you more trustworthy than God?</p>
<p>Beck: I don’t have to be. I’m on Fox.</p>
<p>Attendant: Okay. How’s this?</p>
<p>The attendant reaches into Beck’s ear and pulls out a nickel.</p>
<p>Beck: Big deal. My uncle can do that with a quarter.</p>
<p>Attendant: Can your uncle do this?<br />
 <br />
The attendant reaches into the back of Beck’s pants.</p>
<p>Beck: Hey!!!</p>
<p>With a mighty yank, the attendant pulls out a large chalkboard, much to the discomfort of Beck,</p>
<p>Beck: Are you crazy!?</p>
<p>Attendant: You pull conspiracies out of your butt. I figure I’d check what else is up there.</p>
<p>Rubbing his rear, it begins to hit Beck that this guy isn’t your typical bathroom attendant.</p>
<p>Attendant: You want me to see what else you’ve got up there?</p>
<p>Beck: No, no, no. I believe you. I guess you could be God. I just expected you to look a little more like Charleston Heston or maybe, Roger Ailes; something white and Republican.</p>
<p>God: I am what I am and that is what I am.</p>
<p>Beck: Wow. You actually came to my rally. Just like I said. Hey. I hope I’m not over–reaching here, but do you think the next time I make myself cry you can make my tears look like blood?  Let Olbermann try to make a joke out of that.</p>
<p>God: The bleeding eyes thing is really more of a Robert Rodriguez stunt. If you want, I kill the first born of every speaker here today who has lied? That’ll get their attention.</p>
<p>Beck: Um. I don’t think that’s really what I’m looking for. By the way, did I mention that I didn’t actually hold George Washington’s speech?</p>
<p>God: I know.</p>
<p>Beck: Hey. What about you just coming out and saying something. Maybe give us your blessing.<br />
 <br />
God: Should I tell them that when you found yourself $600,000 short for the rally you prayed to Me for the money and &#8220;Within two days, without telling anyone about it, $600,000 came in&#8221;”</p>
<p>Beck: Actually, that would be perfect.</p>
<p>God: I don’t send money because people pray for it.  I’m God, not Powerball. Why don’t you just tell them what I tell you. You seem to be very good at that.</p>
<p>Beck: Great. Let me get a pen.</p>
<p>God. Don’t bother. I’ll just use the blackboard.</p>
<p>A picture of President Obama appears on the blackboard.  A line from Obama materializes slowly connecting to a picture of Jeremiah Wright which connects to a picture of slaves hanging a white slave owner.</p>
<p>God: First of all, that thing about Obama being a racist who has a deep seated hatred for white people&#8230;</p>
<p>Beck: I might have been stretching a bit there. </p>
<p>God: You also said that the President’s religious belief is a perversion of the gospel of Jesus Christ as most Christians know it. You saying that, in itself, is a perversion of my Son’s gospel.</p>
<p>Beck: I got this big mouth…</p>
<p>God: You don’t promote religion by demeaning another’s beliefs. That would be the very opposite of what you said to those 87,000 people.</p>
<p>Beck: Michelle Bachman said there were over a million.</p>
<p>God: I created Michelle for comic relief, not calculating attendance.</p>
<p>Another line on the blackboard appears from Obama and connects with a picture of Hitler.</p>
<p>God: Then you compared Obama to Hitler.</p>
<p>Beck: Gotcha there. I never said he was Hitler. I just said that he was just doing the same things Hitler did.</p>
<p>A Fox News logo appears on the board. A line from the logo connects to a picture of a Jew in a concentration camp.</p>
<p>God: Then you compared Obama’s treatment of Fox News to Jews being sent to concentration camps.</p>
<p>Beck: Well, that one is on the money. You more than anyone should know that Obama has got to dream about exterminating Fox News.</p>
<p>God: What is in one’s dreams is their business. Using religion to attack another, is no more holy than killing 3,000 innocent people in the name of Me.</p>
<p>Intermission.</p>
<p>Steve Young is the author of “Great Failures of the Extremely Successful” (greatfailure.com) and blogs at the appropriately properly name SteveYoungonpolitics.com</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/iyySu4Bk6BQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/oh-my-god-2010-starring-glenn-beck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/oh-my-god-2010-starring-glenn-beck/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Evidence is in. Glenn Beck and Michael Scott are the Same Person</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/iqoufZukLAo/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/the-evidence-is-in-glenn-beck-and-michael-scott-are-the-same-person/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Michael Scott]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was listening to Glenn Beck pontificate on his radio show about how what happened in the Third Reich is what is happening in America today and that he was surprised the Jews would not be sensitive to this. Being a Jew I wondered too, but not about the myriad of SS in the Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was listening to Glenn Beck pontificate on his radio show about how what happened in the Third Reich is what is happening in America today and that he was surprised the Jews would not be sensitive to this. Being a Jew I wondered too, but not about the myriad of SS in the Obama administration but how this born-again Mormon knew so much about what I should be sensitive to.</p>
<p>Beck spoke about his ignorance of academia, being that he is self taught, but asked his listeners, &#8220;What if I am right?&#8217; Of course he whispered it which makes what he says so cool because then you know he sincerely means it.  It was also at that moment that it all made sense. Glenn Beck is Michael Scott.</p>
<p>Michael Scott is a character in The Office, my favorite sitcom&#8230;other than the ones I was paid to write.  Glenn Beck is a character on radio and Fox News.  I now come to believe that they are, in fact, the same character.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really not so much of a leap. Both are stars on their own hit shows. Both are wont to tear up to make an impression. Both have been known to use a blackboard to rationalize a tortured <span id="more-366"></span>point. Both have an incredibly conflicted view of who they are, beginning particular lines of reasoning with an aw shucks, I don&#8217;t know nothin&#8217;, before giving themselves a standing ovation for grasping the incomprehensible. Like their intimate understanding of how God works.</p>
<p>&#8220;Is there a God&#8230;? Then what are all these churches for?<br />
Michael Scott</p>
<p>&#8220;God is giving a plan, I think, to me&#8230;that is not a plan.&#8221;<br />
Glenn Beck explaining God&#8217;s submission of a plan that is not a plan</p>
<p>While neither is black they both have found Martin Luther King affects their lives in significant ways.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;it was divine providence.&#8221;<br />
Glenn Beck on why he selected the anniversary of Martin Luther King&#8217;s  &#8220;I have a dream&#8221; speech as the day of his 8/28 rally at the Lincoln Memorial.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t understand. We have a day honoring Martin Luther King, but he didn&#8217;t even work here.&#8221;<br />
Michael Scott on MLK Day</p>
<p>They both know ultimate pain</p>
<p>Michael Scott: Can I ask you all a question? Do you know what it&#8217;s like to be disabled?<br />
Phyllis: I had scoliosis as a girl<br />
Michael Scott: Never heard of it. No, a real disability, not a woman&#8217;s trouble.<br />
Creed: When I was a teenager, I was in an iron-lung.<br />
Michael Scott: Wha? How&#8230;how old are you? The point is: I am the only one here who has a legitimate disability. Although I am sure Stanley has had his fair share of obstacles.<br />
Stanley: I&#8217;m not disabled and neither are you.<br />
Michael discussing his mind set after stepping on his George Foremen grill</p>
<p>&#8220;By Saturday night if they had come into my room with a handgun and said, &#8216;OK, we can give you some more medication or take this gun and blow your head off&#8217; &#8230; I would have honestly taken the handgun at that point and ended it.&#8221;<br />
Glenn Beck reporting to viewers his mind-set after his hemorrhoid operation</p>
<p>They both know how to relate to others&#8217; pain.</p>
<p>&#8220;When I see a 9/11 victim family on television, or whatever, I&#8217;m just like, &#8216;Oh shut up&#8217; I&#8217;m so sick of them because they&#8217;re always complaining.&#8221; -&#8221;The Glenn Beck Program,&#8221; Sept. 9, 2005</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not a bad guy, I am a good guy, who just, hits women with his car.&#8221;<br />
Michael Scott after hitting his employee with his car.</p>
<p>Both Scott and Beck have a clear understanding of what it takes to breed racial harmony.</p>
<p>&#8220;You cannot take the hilarious black guy from the office; Stanley is part of what makes this branch so extraordinary. The boozy wisdom, the sassy remarks, the crossword puzzles, the smile, those big watery red eyes. I don&#8217;t know how George Bush did it when Colin Powell left.&#8221; Michael Scott fearing he would lose the one black in his office.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama has exposed himself as a person with a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture&#8230;(Obama) has a problem. This guy is, I believe, a racist.&#8221; Beck explaining President Obama&#8217;s racism.</p>
<p>Then again the Scott-Beck parallel can sustain itself purely on the double-over hilarity that emanates from sense of self.</p>
<p>&#8220;Darryl thinks he&#8217;s such a man because he works in a warehouse. Well big deal! I worked in a warehouse, Men&#8217;s Wearhouse. I was a greeter. I&#8217;d like to see Darryl greet people, probably make them feel like wimps. Not me. I - &#8220;Hello. I&#8217;m Michael. Welcome to Men&#8217;s Wearhouse. We have a special on khaki pants today.&#8221; It&#8217;s just one example.&#8221; Michael Scott &#8220;The Office: Gay Witch Hunt (2006)</p>
<p>&#8220;You know, we all have our inner demons. I, for one - I can&#8217;t speak for you, but I&#8217;m on the verge of moral collapse at any time. It can happen by the end of the show.&#8221;<br />
Glenn Beck Nov. 6, 2006</p>
<p>And the coup d&#8217;etat&#8230;Scott has Dwight and Andy sucking up.  Beck has Pat and Stu.</p>
<p>So my question is not how Glenn Beck would know what I as a Jew would wonder, but why I would ever wonder why Glenn Beck doesn&#8217;t know everything, including how to bring the dead back to life</p>
<p>And that, my friends, is what she said.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/iqoufZukLAo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/the-evidence-is-in-glenn-beck-and-michael-scott-are-the-same-person/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/the-evidence-is-in-glenn-beck-and-michael-scott-are-the-same-person/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Steele Summoned to Limbaugh Extremely-White House</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/aao029fh1xo/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/steele-summoned-to-limbaugh-extremely-white-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 01:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kind of Satire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican Party Chairman, Michael Steele was being &#8220;ordered to appear&#8221; at Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s EIB (Excellence In Broadcasting) Florida compound to explain his comments made at a Connecticut fundraiser Thursday where he told a Republican gathering who were expecting someone of consequence. &#8220;You don&#8217;t do is engage in a land war in Afghanistan,&#8221; said Steele, &#8220;because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Party Chairman, Michael Steele was being &#8220;ordered to appear&#8221; at Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s EIB (Excellence In Broadcasting) Florida compound to explain his comments made at a Connecticut fundraiser Thursday where he told a Republican gathering who were expecting someone of consequence. &#8220;You don&#8217;t do is engage in a land war in Afghanistan,&#8221; said Steele, &#8220;because everyone who&#8217;s tried over a thousand years of history has failed.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I certainly didn&#8217;t mind him calling Afghanistan, &#8216;a war of Obama&#8217;s choosing,&#8217;&#8221; said Titular Head of the Remains of the Republican Party, Limbaugh. &#8220;That shows that he has what it takes to be a damn good talk show host. But to say that<span id="more-362"></span> any war  America is engaged in can&#8217;t be won by us, is just against every piece of bullshit I&#8217;ve tried to sell my listeners for over 20 years.&#8221;</span></p>
<div><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> Steele was also quoted as saying, &#8220;This is not something the United States has actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in.&#8221;</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Friday, Steele spent the day apologizing for his comments.</span></div>
<p><span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">&#8220;What I meant to say was exactly whatever would have pleased Rush,&#8221; explained Steele. &#8220;I hope Emperor Limbaugh understands that I would never say anything that would have disappointed him.  The video being passed around by the progressive, anti-American press, is much more Goebbels than Fox News. Anyone who knows me or someone like me knows that the liberal media edited out my thoughts and only left in my actual words. Is there any question that MediaMatters and Acorn had their anti-troops hands in this?&#8221;</span></span></p>
<div><span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">This isn&#8217;t the first time Steele has had a run in with the harmless loveable little fuzzball and all around good/nice guy, Limbaugh. In an earlier interview, a Steele aide called his first meeting with Limbaugh &#8220;a 10-minute photo op.&#8221;  &#8220;Limbaugh clearly didn&#8217;t know anything about Steele, who he was. He actually thought he was former Eagles quarterback, Donovan McNabb. Here&#8217;s the guy who&#8217;s going to run Limbaugh&#8217;s [expletive] party, but he didn&#8217;t seem very engaged. El Rushbo was pretty disappointed.&#8221;</span></span></div>
<div></div>
<p><span></p>
<div><span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Word is that Steele will be replaced by either actor and former wrestler, Dwayne &#8220;The Rock&#8221; Johnson or, as those close to Limbaugh say, &#8220;someone else who appears to be black-like.&#8221;</span></span></div>
<p> </p>
<p></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/aao029fh1xo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/steele-summoned-to-limbaugh-extremely-white-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/steele-summoned-to-limbaugh-extremely-white-house/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck Takes Dim-witted Reasoning to Historic Level: Compares BP oil spill to a house fire</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/SfYlXYmH7Yc/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/glenn-beck-takes-dim-witted-reasoning-to-historic-level-compares-bp-oil-spill-to-a-house-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BP oil spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Offering his audience unambiguous evidence that his logic disconnects from even the most convoluted reasoning, Friday morning on his radio show, Glenn Beck likened the BP oil spill to a house fire.
&#8220;If a house burnt down, would we stop building houses?&#8221;
Sure we would, Glenn…
If the blaze raged on for over a month.
if the burning house [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offering his audience unambiguous evidence that his logic disconnects from even the most convoluted reasoning, Friday morning on his radio show, Glenn Beck likened the BP oil spill to a house fire.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;If a house burnt down, would we stop building houses?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Sure we would, Glenn…</p>
<p>If the blaze raged on for over a month.</p>
<p>if the burning house caused the worst environmental disaster in history and there were no firemen who had any idea how to put it out.</p>
<p>if 70 miles of coastline had been contaminated by <span id="more-361"></span>the house fire.</p>
<p> if millions of gallons of oil spilled out of the house.</p>
<p> if the inferno was ten times worse than Katrina.</p>
<p>if the flames from the house destroyed tens of thousands of fish, birds and nutria, annihilating a region&#8217;s marine food chain and perhaps affecting wildlife for as long as a century.</p>
<p>if the fire put thousands of people whose livelihood was based on shoreline revenues on to the unemployment roles.</p>
<p>if the people who were in charge of putting out the fire caused the fire.</p>
<p>Don’t you see how well Glenn’s analogy works?</p>
<p>No?  Well perhaps his climb all over President Obama’s calling to suspend deep sea drilling will change your mind.</p>
<p>After playing a tape of President Obama saying that drilling in waters would be suspended, Beck seamlessly expanded that into intimating the President was speaking about ALL oil drilling, reminding his listeners that Rockefeller had drilled for oil. Yes, I know John D never drilled a mile down into an ocean, but that didn’t matter as the essence of Glenn’s argument was not the relationship of drilling to wealthy oilmen as it was of his overwhelming success of pitching nonsensical crap to a massive audience that eats it up in shovel fulls. To not suspend under water oil drilling until you find the cause as well as a manner of plugging up the spill should it happen again would be criminally negligent. Only a madman or an egregiously callous snake-oil pitchman would even consider it an legitimate argument.</p>
<p>Even if Glenn were to defend his embarrassingly inept rant as his unique brand of hilarity, sarcasm to make a point is not humor if the basis of your joke is hysterically flawed.  An “airplane food” joke would never work if all airlines fed every passenger from the first class kitchen.  But this was no joke. This was purely a heartless disregard for those affected by the spill. A house fire is not anywhere near the level of an economic and environmental disaster. Will he next equate an ingrown toenail to the Holocaust?  Stay tuned.  </p>
<p>Equating the oil spill to the dropping of a glass of wine on a rug, one of his radio playmates chided. “Accidents happen,”</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Glenn Beck is an accident that has already burned out of control.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/SfYlXYmH7Yc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/glenn-beck-takes-dim-witted-reasoning-to-historic-level-compares-bp-oil-spill-to-a-house-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/glenn-beck-takes-dim-witted-reasoning-to-historic-level-compares-bp-oil-spill-to-a-house-fire/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul Suggests Law of Gravity Be Left to States</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/6-KkQxBwT1A/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/rand-paul-suggests-law-of-gravity-be-left-to-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kind of Satire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow of MSNBC, Senatorial candidate Rand Paul (R, Ky) expressed controversial views concerning a number of issues thought to be a matter of settled law. While his statements concerning civil rights received the most attention, his position on a heretofore unchallenged law seems to have escaped media analysis&#8230;the law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow of MSNBC, Senatorial candidate Rand Paul (R, Ky) expressed controversial views concerning a number of issues thought to be a matter of settled law. While his statements concerning civil rights received the most attention, his position on a heretofore unchallenged law seems to have escaped media analysis&#8230;the law of gravity</span></span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">“I&#8217;m not in favor of discrimination in any form. I would never belong to any private club that denied gravity for any race of people,” Paul said. “But we still have plenty of American space rockets where gravity does not exist.  Are we to tell our country’s hard working astronauts that they are no longer <span id="more-360"></span>allowed to spend time in areas that might discriminate against gravity.”</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Paul told Maddow that he agrees with most parts of the law of gravity but takes exception with a particular clause that makes it unacceptable for those who chose to do so, to float away.  Paul explained that, had he been in office when the first apple  fell from a tree, he would have tried to stop every massive particle in the universe from attracting every other massive particle with a force which is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">“If non-Americans like Galileo and Newton choose to  subscribe to so-called gravity, that is their choice,” said Paul. “Just as it is any other person’s choice  to not  have electro-magnetic forces and matter coalesce.”</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Paul’s postulation is not without backers. His supporters - scientists, conservative think tanks such as the Let Air Alone Institute, and companies such as ExxonMobil - have challenged gravity adherents and  disagree with scientific consensus. They believe that the science of things falling down when dropped is uncertain, and while there are some objects that may be affected by “so-called gravity,” there is enough scientific as well as historical evidence to question the law.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Conservative talk show host and chalk board advocate, Glenn Beck, says that gravity as a law stifles the rights our founding fathers fought and died for.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">“While not inscribed in the Constitution,” Beck points out, “Anyone who has studied Thomas Jefferson’s papers knows that he wrote to Ben Franklin that ‘Man has been created in the image of God, and God himself stays above the clouds without the aid of  mechanism or trickery. Similarly, flying or hovering above the ground should not be forbidden to any person…excepting women and non-protestants .&#8217;”    </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">While Paul believes in the right of gravity, he doesn’t think the federal government should be imposing it on local jurisdictions.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">“At the least, gravity should be a matter of state’s rights,” said Paul. “But I think what&#8217;s important in this debate is not getting into any specific ‘Gotcha’ on this, but asking the question &#8216;What about the freedom to float?&#8217; Tell me you haven’t ever dreamt that you were able to fly, even it’s only three feet above the ground.  This is a slippery slope. What’s next? Outlawing our dreams? We don’t limit racists from dreaming.  And while I don&#8217;t want to be associated with those people, I also don&#8217;t want to limit their dreams in any way. We tolerate boorish and uncivilized behavior because that&#8217;s one of the things that freedom requires: allowing people to be boorish, ignorant, bigoted, and uncivilized, and to talk for hours about things they know nothing about. But that doesn&#8217;t mean we approve of it.”</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">While not all Republican leaders are ready to support Paul&#8217;s gravitational statements, saying they have not yet had an opportunity to fully study Paul&#8217;s position on gravity and weigh its merits, others like </span></span><span lang="EN">Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), a Paul-booster, are fully on board..  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;" lang="EN">“Today it’s</span> gravity,” said DeMint. “Tomorrow they’ll be stuffing abolitionism down our throats.” </span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/6-KkQxBwT1A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/rand-paul-suggests-law-of-gravity-be-left-to-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/rand-paul-suggests-law-of-gravity-be-left-to-states/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Philly To Host Terrorist Trial?  Please, Please, Please. (Steve In Ink)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/iM55bxD3WKo/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/philly-to-host-terrorist-trial-please-please-please-steve-in-ink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kind of Satire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Khalid Sheik Mohammed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

(Excerpted in today&#8217;s Philadelphia Inquirer)
&#8220;We need to manage expectations about what we can do with the limited resources that we have…” Mayor Michael Nutter speaking about the city’s fiscal crisis. 

Well, Mayor, the answer to you and the city’s financial problems just may be sitting hooded and in chains right in front of you. 
Taken aback by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div></div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">(<a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100308_Bring_the_terror_trial_here.html">Excerpted in today&#8217;s Philadelphia Inquirer)</a></p>
<div>&#8220;We need to manage expectations about what we can do with the limited resources that we have…” Mayor Michael Nutter speaking about the city’s fiscal crisis.<span style="font-size: small;"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Well, Mayor, the answer to you and the city’s financial problems just may be sitting hooded and in chains right in front of you. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Taken aback by the intense criticism from political opponents and local officials of President Obama’s decision to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed in a civilian courtroom in New York, the City of Brotherly Love just may be the perfect location to transfer the trial of one of the masterminds behind the 9/11 attacks. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Philadelphia Convention and Visitors Bureau, take note. Independence Hall and<span id="more-359"></span> the Liberty Bell may be historical, but they’re old news.  A terrorist trial, that’s history in the making and would deliver the biggest financial payoff since William Penn made the deal with the Lenape tribe. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">All Mayor Nutter has to do is invite the trial to the Philadelphia Convention Center. Right now they hold court for, yawn, The Home Show, The Auto Show and The Flower Show.  The Khalid Mohammed Show would top them all for pure family entertainment and bang for the buck. With the probable length of the trial we&#8217;d have the place booked for years.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">But the benefits don’t stop at the Convention Center. Filmmakers would be knocking down Philadelphia Film Department’s Sharon Pinkenson&#8217;s door for permits to shoot reams of documentary footage. Sure<em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">, Parking Wars</em> can’t be beat for pure meter maid titillation but with terrorists in the City of Brotherly, the skies the limit. Think <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Jersey</em><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"> Shore</em> meets Gitmo.<em> Rocky</em> vs Osama.  Forget M. Night Shyamalan.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>How long do you think Spielberg and Tom Hanks would show up to produce the HBO series? What better place for Oliver Stone to promulgate <span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">historical inaccuracies than in historical Philadelphia as he develops his fifth plane conspiracy theory. </span><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">Sure, there’s the naysayers. </span><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">A terrorist trial would hold a lethal threat for Philadelphians that we couldn&#8217;t deal with.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Tell that to Schuylkill Expressway drivers. </span>We’ve had grisly courtroom dramas here before - Mumia Abu-Jamal, Ira Einhorn, Larry Mendte – and we’ve gotten through them without any serious damage. The tourism dollars alone would pay for any additional city costs and potential bomb repairs. With the federal financial support, city payroll taxes for additional police and other first responders alone would resolve the city budget crisis. The Reading Terminal Market wouldn&#8217;t have to close at six. Can you say “Stephen Starr hasn’t opened a new restaurant for almost a week”? <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It’s about time for at least three more fabulous themed Starr bistros (re: Terror on Market, Mohammedkhan, Breakfast, Lunch &amp; Execution). </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">We’d have parking ticket revenue up the ying yang.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>How many cable news networks would need to build permanent studios here?. We’d house Fox News next to MSNBC. Time to think big.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Forget Eskin vs Missanelli.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Imagine O’Reilly vs Olbermann every night.  Okay, maybe not.. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Think the Fumo trial was a godsend to Inquirer content? Advertisers would be climbing over one another to take advantage of the killer impact on circulation. Anyone with half a mind knows, terrorism trials sell cars. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">To give local security a break, Mohammed wouldn’t have to be housed here on weekends. That would be left to Levittown which has plenty of room at the abandoned Levitz Furniture 53,000 square foot showroom just off Rte 95, a quick hop down to the Convention Center for the trial. A Middletown Township Supervisor who asked to remain anonymous said that Levittown would be &#8220;honored and proud&#8221; to lodge Mohammed as a humanitarian gesture and a nice shot in the arm for tourism. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">“Other than Sesame Place there’s not much to do here,&#8221; said the unnamed chairman. &#8220;Right now, the warehouse between The Dump and Dollar City is an eyesore. With the money we’d get we could throw on a fresh coat of paint on the warehouse and the rest would go a long way in paying for that fire truck we’ve been looking at.&#8221; </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Area residents are taking to the idea. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&#8220;Hey, since they closed down the ice cream parlor at Greenwood Dairies we’ve all been looking for something to do,&#8221; said one longtime resident,. &#8220;And if that sumavabitch thinks of trying to escape, I’ve got a new semi-automatic I’ve just been itching to try out.&#8221; </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">So, Mayor Nutter, before you cut school budgets, pensions or the next Mummers Parade, remember what could be Philly’s newest slogan…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">”Have your next trial here.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>With love, Philadelphia XO.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><em>Steve Young is author of &#8220;Great Failures of the Extremely Successful&#8230;Mistakes, Adversity, Failure and other Steppingstones to Success.&#8221; (</em><a href="http://www.greatfailure.com/"><em>www.greatfailure.com</em></a><em>) and speaks on dynamic answers to all crisises.</em></p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p></span></div>
<p> </p>
<p></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/iM55bxD3WKo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/philly-to-host-terrorist-trial-please-please-please-steve-in-ink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/philly-to-host-terrorist-trial-please-please-please-steve-in-ink/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Satire Rationalization F-ing Laughable</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/EmS_9xjRd7M/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/palin-satire-rationalization-laughable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kind of Satire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Limbaugh]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[retard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;F—ing retarded.&#8221;  Presidential Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel scolding a liberal group at a private meeting at the White House. 
“Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.” Sarah Palin wrote while calling for Emanuel’s firing on her Facebook page 
&#8220;Our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><em>&#8220;F—ing retarded.&#8221;  </em>Presidential Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel scolding a liberal group at a private meeting at the White House. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><em>“Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.”</em> Sarah Palin wrote while calling for Emanuel’s firing on her Facebook page<em> </em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><em>&#8220;Our political correct society is acting like some giant insult&#8217;s taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards, retards…There’s going to be a retard summit at the White House.”</em> Rush Limbaugh on his radio show referring to Emanuel’s comments and his White House meeting with<span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> disability advocates.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><em><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">“They are kooks, so I agree with Rush Limbaugh.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Ru</span>sh Limbaugh was using satire &#8230; I didn&#8217;t hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with &#8216;f-ing retards,&#8217; and we did know that Rahm Emanuel, as has been reported, did say that. There is a big difference there.&#8221;</em> Sarah Palin, defending Limbaugh on Fox News Sunday. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Strap on your seatbelts, folks! You’re about to board the Sarah Palin Hypocrite Coaster.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>You must be <span id="more-358"></span>this obtuse to ride.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> As a former TV writer and political editor of National Lampoon, I don’t know if there’s anything off-limits when satirizing, though one would hope those commanding the pen have some inkling of what satire means before they take to the page. Joking isn’t necessarily satire. I’ve heard a lot of offensive jokes that don’t fall within an ironic mile from satire. But for argument’s sake, let’s say Limbaugh was using satire to rip into Emanuel.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">My argument here isn’t with Limbaugh as much as it is with Palin’s selective righteous indignation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>If I have this right, the former governor feels Emanuel’s crude colloquial usage of the word “retard” in a private meeting is a “…slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them,” but if used <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">satirically</em> over the radio to millions of listeners to describe Emanuel, liberal groups and mental health advocates, it&#8217;s okey-dokey.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Okay, governor, let’s try this one out.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">You know what’s retarded?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Claiming you know foreign policy because “you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>You know what else is retarded?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Telling David Letterman that a joking reference to your daughter is out of bounds but defending Rush Limbaugh’s reference to people (including mental health advocates) as retards who were attending a retarded summit. That’s real retarded. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Almost as retarded as quitting half way through your governorship and saying you’re not quitting but that “I know when it&#8217;s time to pass the ball for victory.” <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But not as retarded as saying Rush Limbaugh - who called people “retarded” - was only quoting Emanuel – who was calling a proposal “retarded” - when the only words of Emanuel he “quoted” were “f-ing retarded.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>You know how retarded that is?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>It’s like saying “four score and seven disabled children should be shot and dismembered” and then saying you were just quoting the Gettysburg address. Retarded? Sure. But you know who is the biggest retard?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The hypocritical retard who deceitfully uses her own down syndrome baby as a political brickbat to bash her opponents, but allows the same child and all the other of “God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities” to be slurred to millions of Americans by the most retarded retard on the radio. A politically opportunistic retard who puts a pompous retard of a talk show host above her own special needs child. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That, ladies and gentleman, is not only f’-ing retarded.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>It is terribly and incredibly sad.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">So…whataya think, Sarah?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>I’m only quoting Emanuel. Pretty satirical, huh?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Steve</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</div>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/EmS_9xjRd7M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/palin-satire-rationalization-laughable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/palin-satire-rationalization-laughable/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Qaeda Claims Responsibility For 2009</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/O7qTabDrQng/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/al-qaeda-claims-responsibility-for-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a statement released Monday that spread quickly over jihadist Web forums, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula claimed responsibility for the entire year of 2009, sending the Obama administration into a rush of closed, high level meetings to deal with the political fallout from the year-long attack. 
 
Taking credit for everything from Jon and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">In a statement released Monday that spread quickly over jihadist Web forums, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula claimed responsibility for the entire year of 2009, sending the Obama administration into a rush of closed, high level meetings to deal with the political fallout from the year-long attack. </span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">Taking credit for everything from Jon and Kate’s breakup, Tiger Woods’ dalliances and the Balloon Boy to the recession, Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize and Glenn Beck, the group that claimed loyalty to Osama bin Laden alleged that Al Qaeda launched 2009 in response to &#8220;American aggression&#8221; in Yemen, which has been the site of recent U.S. predator drone attacks.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The message maintained that <span id="more-357"></span>Al Qaeda operatives were positioned as early as 2005 preparing for the all-out 365 day assault this past year.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> &#8220;Let the American Satan dogs beware that this is just the beginning,” read the statement. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>“Octomom, Kanye West and the White House party crashers will seem like just trivial TMZ segments compared to what we have planned for 2010.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">President Obama issued his first statement on the year’s attack, telling Americans that his government was doing everything in its power to keep them safe from 2010. Hours earlier, Janet Napalitano backed away from her comments Sunday that &#8220;the system worked this year.&#8221; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">“I misspoke,” said the homeland security secretary. “What I meant was that, ‘I thought’ they worked.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Clearly ‘thinking’ something doesn’t mean I wanted anyone to believe it was, in fact, so.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">The terrorist statement also said that the attempted attack on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 was only a mislead to throw off security officials.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">“C’mon, a bomb in a Nigerian’s underwear?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>That’s a hoot. How much damage could that cause compared to the tens of billions lost in ad revenue in Tiger Woods pants?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Do you know how many acts of cultural devastation we snuck past security while officials worried about a single pair of soiled boxers.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">The group also called on “Muslim crusaders to turn every 2010 Entertainment Tonight story into an American nightmare.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="mso-ansi-language: EN;" lang="EN">A National Security official, on the condition of anonymity revealed that Homeland Security is considering seriously not allowing 2010 into the country until 2011.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">“We don’t want to welcome in the new year until we’re absolutely certain that every single reality TV show has been cancelled.”</span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><em></em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><em>Steve</em></span></div>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/O7qTabDrQng" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/al-qaeda-claims-responsibility-for-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/al-qaeda-claims-responsibility-for-2009/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Will O’Reilly Blame Washington Times Fall On Its Right Wing Slant?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/d2iSmh-YMHY/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/will-o%e2%80%99reilly-blame-washington-times-fall-on-its-right-wing-slant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Full disclosure: I have been published in The Washington Times, New York Times, Philadelphia Inquirer and the Los Angeles Times)
In April of this year, Bill O&#8217;Reilly wrote that &#8220;The New York Times is most definitely a committed left-wing concern that is openly contemptuous of the conservative, traditional point-of-view. That is the primary reason the paper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Full disclosure: I have been published in The Washington Times, New York Times, Philadelphia Inquirer and the Los Angeles Times)</p>
<p>In April of this year, Bill O&#8217;Reilly wrote that &#8220;The New York Times is most definitely a committed left-wing concern that is openly contemptuous of the conservative, traditional point-of-view. That is the primary reason the paper may soon dissolve.&#8221;  He&#8217;s laid the same wood to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Los Angeles Times and pretty much any newspaper or mainstream media outlet who wrote or said something Bill disagreed <span id="more-356"></span>with.</p>
<p> This week I&#8217;m sure he will offer the same rationale in explaining why The Washington Times, the decidedly right wing newspaper arm of the Republican Party, announced Wednesday that it is laying off at least 40 percent of its staff and shifting mainly to free distribution.</p>
<p>Different than any of the newspapers who Bill has blamed left-wing leanings for their losses, the Times pretty much admitted its long time bias saying that it will cease any presumed semblance of being a bona fide full-coverage daily, factual coverage of the news and instead offer &#8220;cultural coverage based on traditional values&#8221; - right wing code for right wing.</p>
<p>Obviously, Bill will spend this week&#8217;s column and any number of his Factor&#8217;s Talking Points explaining how The Washington Time&#8217;s collapse is the result of it being a committed right wing concern that is openly contemptuous of the middle of the road, traditional point of view.</p>
<p>And clearly Bill will go over the background of the Washington Times never being a real newspaper, but only the Unification Church&#8217;s Rev. Sun Myung Moon&#8217;s influence peddler that has lost billions since it went to press in 1982.</p>
<p>As Bill&#8217;s written before, &#8220;The truth is that most Americans are traditional-minded folks; they believe their country is noble, they want respectful discourse.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously The Washington Times did not provide that.</p>
<p>Tune into The Factor tonight for Bill&#8217;s rundown of how once again the conservative media has failed the fair-minded American and respectful discourse.</p>
<p><em>Steve</em></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/d2iSmh-YMHY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/will-o%e2%80%99reilly-blame-washington-times-fall-on-its-right-wing-slant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/will-o%e2%80%99reilly-blame-washington-times-fall-on-its-right-wing-slant/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Pies In Heaven’s Face: Soupy Sales RIP (1926-2009)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~3/LBHVi3vU-1w/</link>
		<comments>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/pies-in-heavens-face-soupy-sales-rip-1926-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Young</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Soupy Sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for White Fang, Black Tooth, Pookie, the topless neighbor at the door, the Man on the Roof Who&#8217;s From Duluth Without A Tooth, pies in the face of Sinatra and the rest&#8230;
But most of all, thanks for the doubled over laughter.
Steve
 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/soupy-sales.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-355" title="soupy-sales" src="http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/soupy-sales.jpg" alt="" width="125" height="125" /></a>Thanks for White Fang, Black Tooth, Pookie, the topless neighbor at the door, the Man on the Roof Who&#8217;s From Duluth Without A Tooth, pies in the face of Sinatra and the rest&#8230;</p>
<p>But most of all, thanks for the doubled over laughter.</p>
<p><em>Steve</em></p>
<p> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SteveYoungOnPolitics/~4/LBHVi3vU-1w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/pies-in-heavens-face-soupy-sales-rip-1926-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://steveyoungonpolitics.com/pies-in-heavens-face-soupy-sales-rip-1926-2009/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
