<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Synesthesia</title>
	
	<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Notes on stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SynesthesiaComments" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Lean Programme Shaping – Finding the Value Stream by Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2009/11/03/lean-programme-shaping-finding-the-value-stream/comment-page-1/#comment-373311</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/?p=1443#comment-373311</guid>
		<description>@Peter

Thanks for your interest. Agree completely!

The approach I have developed in practice, and which I am now trying to put into a theoretical context with this series of posts, is very heavily influenced by the work done by the Agile movement in software development, especially the application of Lean principles.

I certainly intend to look at programme delivery later, as I think that is a rich ground for improvement through a flow- and people-based approach. However I also feel that it is the messier early stages of getting the ideas shaped into the first programme definition that have received least attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter</p>
<p>Thanks for your interest. Agree completely!</p>
<p>The approach I have developed in practice, and which I am now trying to put into a theoretical context with this series of posts, is very heavily influenced by the work done by the Agile movement in software development, especially the application of Lean principles.</p>
<p>I certainly intend to look at programme delivery later, as I think that is a rich ground for improvement through a flow- and people-based approach. However I also feel that it is the messier early stages of getting the ideas shaped into the first programme definition that have received least attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lean Programme Shaping – Finding the Value Stream by Peter Stansbury</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2009/11/03/lean-programme-shaping-finding-the-value-stream/comment-page-1/#comment-373310</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Stansbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/?p=1443#comment-373310</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts Julian.  I hope you will move this on to programme delivery next - to me this is where the strongest correlation lies.  Programmes that are transformational and people-oriented can easily be crippled by a prescriptive approach.  Time and again I find people grapple with MSP, cannot find enough detail so revert to PRINCE2 to guide them through their programme.  This often proves fatal.  While not the complete answer, I like the agile manifesto (http://agilemanifesto.org/) and in particular the preference for:

-Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
-Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
-Responding to change over following a plan 

This would be a good basis for an approach.  Meantime I look forward to your post on waste!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts Julian.  I hope you will move this on to programme delivery next &#8211; to me this is where the strongest correlation lies.  Programmes that are transformational and people-oriented can easily be crippled by a prescriptive approach.  Time and again I find people grapple with MSP, cannot find enough detail so revert to PRINCE2 to guide them through their programme.  This often proves fatal.  While not the complete answer, I like the agile manifesto (<a href="http://agilemanifesto.org/" rel="nofollow">http://agilemanifesto.org/</a>) and in particular the preference for:</p>
<p>-Individuals and interactions over processes and tools<br />
-Customer collaboration over contract negotiation<br />
-Responding to change over following a plan </p>
<p>This would be a good basis for an approach.  Meantime I look forward to your post on waste!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Case Study: Delivering a Public-Private Partnership using DSDM by Richard Lamb</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/02/12/case-study-delivering-a-public-private-partnership-using-dsdm/comment-page-1/#comment-314830</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/02/12/case-study-delivering-a-public-private-partnership-using-dsdm/#comment-314830</guid>
		<description>Hi,

This case study was an informative read, with points which echo my own experiences in applying Agile disciplines to UK public sector IT delivery. 

My own experience at the Coal Authority was generally positive though with a few caveats:
 - Making sure that 3rd party developers are familiar with using Agile/iterative disciplines can be a headache, particular in PRINCE2-dominated IT 'cultures'
 - User education: ensuring that business reps know IT nomenclature and are engaged for the duration of the project. I found a 'terms of reference' session  with my own business reps at then outset proved invaluable
 - Using MoSCoW wisely: I've discovered that prioritising requirements via MoSCoW can prove irrelevant and distracting in non-iterative project approaches. Make sure everybody knows why we use it, and how MoSCoW relates to a disciplined time-boxing approach.
 - Communicate, communicate, communicate! Maintaining open channels between business reps and developers proved to be a god-send when code and database dependency-related bugs surfaced, as they worked side-by-side (or phone-by-phone) to arrive at fixes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>This case study was an informative read, with points which echo my own experiences in applying Agile disciplines to UK public sector IT delivery. </p>
<p>My own experience at the Coal Authority was generally positive though with a few caveats:<br />
 &#8211; Making sure that 3rd party developers are familiar with using Agile/iterative disciplines can be a headache, particular in PRINCE2-dominated IT &#8216;cultures&#8217;<br />
 &#8211; User education: ensuring that business reps know IT nomenclature and are engaged for the duration of the project. I found a &#8216;terms of reference&#8217; session  with my own business reps at then outset proved invaluable<br />
 &#8211; Using MoSCoW wisely: I&#8217;ve discovered that prioritising requirements via MoSCoW can prove irrelevant and distracting in non-iterative project approaches. Make sure everybody knows why we use it, and how MoSCoW relates to a disciplined time-boxing approach.<br />
 &#8211; Communicate, communicate, communicate! Maintaining open channels between business reps and developers proved to be a god-send when code and database dependency-related bugs surfaced, as they worked side-by-side (or phone-by-phone) to arrive at fixes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convalescent Workout by Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/09/22/convalescent-workout/comment-page-1/#comment-305715</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/?p=1249#comment-305715</guid>
		<description>Thanks Imran. Those 30-second rests are a killer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Imran. Those 30-second rests are a killer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convalescent Workout by imran ilahi</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/09/22/convalescent-workout/comment-page-1/#comment-304812</link>
		<dc:creator>imran ilahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/?p=1249#comment-304812</guid>
		<description>Julian

well done great program, keep your rep range high(20)and rest time low(30 sec between each 4 exercise circuit). That should keep your heart and lungs going until you get back into the boxing ring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian</p>
<p>well done great program, keep your rep range high(20)and rest time low(30 sec between each 4 exercise circuit). That should keep your heart and lungs going until you get back into the boxing ring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problem with OpenOffice and Ruby by danimata</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2005/03/25/problem-with-openoffice-and-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-302622</link>
		<dc:creator>danimata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2005/03/25/problem-with-openoffice-and-ruby/#comment-302622</guid>
		<description>Lovely. You really helped me 3 years and a half after your post. Tanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely. You really helped me 3 years and a half after your post. Tanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enterprise SaaS and Mashups by Bill Ives</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/09/16/enterprise-saas-and-mashups/comment-page-1/#comment-302377</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/?p=1224#comment-302377</guid>
		<description>Julian

Thanks for your recognition. I like your blog and added it to my list. 

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian</p>
<p>Thanks for your recognition. I like your blog and added it to my list. </p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Links roundup for 2008-08-01 by John</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/08/02/links-roundup-for-2008-08-01/comment-page-1/#comment-296004</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/?p=1208#comment-296004</guid>
		<description>I suggest you try &lt;a href="http://eatbytes.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Eat Bytes Free Files Hosting&lt;/a&gt; to host your files.  They have a 300Mb upload limit with no download restrictions.  They are indeed better than FileDropper.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you try <a href="http://eatbytes.com" rel="nofollow">Eat Bytes Free Files Hosting</a> to host your files.  They have a 300Mb upload limit with no download restrictions.  They are indeed better than FileDropper.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trying a gym class – BodyPump by Emilie</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/11/trying-a-gym-class-bodypump/comment-page-1/#comment-235554</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/11/trying-a-gym-class-bodypump/#comment-235554</guid>
		<description>best thing to do is tell your instructor that you have knee injury and they will know not to encourage you and to show you a different exercice to do while the others are doing the lunges. I love Body Pump i started it again today ( i did it for 2 years previously) and my body is aching, the results are amazing though, you will see the difference in 4 weeks if you keep at it. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best thing to do is tell your instructor that you have knee injury and they will know not to encourage you and to show you a different exercice to do while the others are doing the lunges. I love Body Pump i started it again today ( i did it for 2 years previously) and my body is aching, the results are amazing though, you will see the difference in 4 weeks if you keep at it. <img src='http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Owns My Social Graph? by Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/03/10/who-owns-my-social-graph/comment-page-1/#comment-222599</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/03/10/who-owns-my-social-graph/#comment-222599</guid>
		<description>Thanks to both for your comments.

Jon  - I think you are spot on in the trends you mention - and two things you have blogged lately support that - &lt;a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/2008/03/the-future-of-s.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Charlene Li's recent post&lt;/a&gt; and the news about &lt;a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/yahoo-to-join-google-led-social-networking-alliance/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Yahoo and OpenSocial&lt;/a&gt;

epredator - agree that it is increasingly impossible to divide "pure work" and "pure social" - in fact if you want employees to network effectively even within the organisation then you have to recognise the importance of social bonds of various sorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to both for your comments.</p>
<p>Jon  &#8211; I think you are spot on in the trends you mention &#8211; and two things you have blogged lately support that &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/2008/03/the-future-of-s.html" rel="nofollow">Charlene Li&#8217;s recent post</a> and the news about <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/yahoo-to-join-google-led-social-networking-alliance/index.html" rel="nofollow">Yahoo and OpenSocial</a></p>
<p>epredator &#8211; agree that it is increasingly impossible to divide &#8220;pure work&#8221; and &#8220;pure social&#8221; &#8211; in fact if you want employees to network effectively even within the organisation then you have to recognise the importance of social bonds of various sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
