Keith Barrows

Apollo Landing Sites from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

Founder — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:22:23 GMT

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has made it's flybys of the moon and has captured several great images. I noticed, on the Dvice web site, that a lot of comments are still in the "we never landed on the moon" vein. I find it laughable that these flat worlders are still out there. And why can't the satellites point at the moon and get great shots? We don't have a budget to turn them around is one possible answer. The Hubble cannot focus on anything that close is another possible answer. But – you decide for yourself…

See the Apollo Gallery

Missing lunar tapes finally revealed

Founder — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:52:00 GMT

Discovery Channel has a blog on the missing tapes. In reality, they were never missing. The technology was lost to read these tapes.

Holmes is hopeful of getting the tape recorder working again in January, and then he said it should only take a week to extract information that has been locked away since the early 1970s.

It'll still be a few months before the data is available. I'm looking forward to what may come out of this. If we don't reach for the stars we are not going to get very far. :)

TED Talks

Founder — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:53:44 GMT

A cool site tracking some of the great speeches, talks, casts, etc. Go visit TED Talks now.

[Antigravity_open-source] Gravities Secret...

Founder — Wed, 02 May 2007 23:43:22 GMT

Gravity's secret
11 November 2006
NewScientist.com news service
Stuart Clark

Gravity has a secret side. As well as the brute force that holds us
to the ground, large masses should also exert a subtle swirling
influence when they rotate, a force called gravitomagnetism. It's so
faint that a NASA spacecraft called Gravity Probe B has been orbiting
the Earth for over two years to accrue enough evidence to have a
chance of confirming this force.

Yet in a lab in Austria, Martin Tajmar and his team have already
succeeded in detecting a faint signal that seems to be due to this
elusive component of gravity. A reason for celebration? Not quite.
Puzzlingly, the force they seem to have generated is vastly more
powerful than anyone else expected.

Despite its name, gravitomagnetism has nothing to do with magnetic
fields as we think of them. According to Einstein's general theory of
relativity, a rotating mass such as a planet should twist the fabric
of space-time, and any object nearby should be dragged around by the
vortex. It is really just another case of matter telling space-time
how to curve and space-time telling matter how to move. Just as a
stationary mass creates a "dip" in space-time that we perceive as
gravity, a rotating mass creates a twist in space-time.

"A rotating mass is expected to twist space-time - but not by this
much"This gravitomagnetism is a feeble phenomenon: an object orbiting
close to the Earth should be shifted just a few nanometres per year.
In contrast, the gravitomagnetic force Tajmar's team have seen is
trillions of times stronger, which is why they are treating the
results so cautiously. What's more, their force is only generated by
a spinning superconductor, not any other kind of matter. "We cannot
find a mechanism to explain this in either general relativity or
quantum mechanics," says Clovis de Matos, who works at the European
Space Agency in Paris and helped establish the theory behind the
experiment.

Their startling measurement might point towards a new quantum theory
of gravity. It might even herald a futuristic technology that could
be used to pull, push or levitate any object, regardless of its
composition, electrical charge or shape. With so much at stake, it's
no wonder Tajmar and his collaborators are treading carefully. "We
tried everything we could think of to make this reading go away,"
says Tajmar. And yet after three years and more than 250 experimental
runs at the Austrian Research Centers facility in Seibersdorf, near
Vienna, the gravitomagnetic signal remains.

By sheer coincidence, their experiment was originally designed to
investigate an old mystery about the innards of Gravity Probe B. NASA
launched this spacecraft on 20 April 2004 to directly measure the
effects of this long-sought-after component of gravity. The
spacecraft finished collecting data in August 2005, and the science
team is on course to announce its results in April next year.

Gravitomagnetic fields affect spinning objects more strongly than non-
spinning objects, so Gravity Probe B's detector is based around four
gyroscopes. The Earth's gravitomagnetism should tilt them by 11
millionths of a degree per year. To register this minuscule shift,
the gyroscopes must run as smoothly as possible, and each one
contains a rotating quartz sphere so perfectly crafted that if it
were blown up to the size of the Earth, the tallest mountain would be
less than 3 metres high. At the size of the gyroscopes, about the
diameter of a ping-pong ball, that's an accuracy of just 40 atoms'
thickness.

Having made something so flawless, the Gravity Probe B team realised
that they had painted themselves into a corner. "How do you measure a
spinning, perfectly uniform sphere that has no marks on it?" asks the
spacecraft's principal investigator, Francis Everitt of Stanford
University in California.

The trick was to coat each quartz sphere in a layer of niobium. When
cooled to the point where it superconducts, the niobium generates a
magnetic field as it spins, whose axis is exactly the same as the
sphere's axis of rotation. The team then adapted sensitive
magnetometers called SQUIDs (superconducting quantum interference
devices) to measure the axis of this field and so track the motion of
the sphere. The result is a gyroscope 30 million times more accurate
than any previously constructed.

In the mid-1980s, Blas Cabrera, also of Stanford University, saw
Everitt's work on these gyroscopes and realised that they offered a
way to test the theory of superconductors proposed in 1957 by John
Bardeen, Leon Cooper and Robert Schrieffer, known as BCS theory. It
says that when the temperature of the material falls below the
critical temperature for superconductivity, pairs of electrons
overcome their normal repulsion and join into bound systems known as
Cooper pairs. Cabrera realised that since the gyroscope's magnetic
field is due to the motion of electrons inside the superconductor,
the field could reveal whether those electrons were indeed pairing up.

Janet Tate, now of the University of Oregon in Eugene, ran the
experiments. She took one of the gyroscopes and spun it at different
speeds to measure the resulting field produced by an accelerating
superconductor. That's when the trouble started. Tate found that the
magnetic field she measured was stronger than BCS theory predicted.

As the anomaly didn't affect the performance of the gyroscopes,
finding the cause wasn't essential to the workings of the NASA
spacecraft. So, after an initial flurry of interest by physicists,
the problem was quietly dropped. "The measurement has remained
unexplained for the last 20 years," says Tate.

Enter de Matos and Tajmar. Intrigued by this puzzle, they began to
dig around the theory of superconductors looking for clues. They
found one in a 1997 paper by John Argyris and Corneliu Ciubotariu of
the University of Stuttgart in Germany. Argyris proposed that the
hypothesised gravity particle, the graviton, might have mass, rather
than being massless as traditional theories of quantum gravity had
assumed.

Argyris's idea piqued de Matos and Tajmar's interest because of the
parallel with the normally massless photon, which inside a
superconductor develops a mass when the temperature drops below the
critical temperature and the substance becomes superconducting.
Tajmar and de Matos wondered what would happen if the gravitons
inside a superconductor behaved like photons and gained mass as well.

Their calculations showed that the more massive the graviton becomes
in a superconductor, the stronger the gravitomagnetic field becomes
when the material's rotation speeds up. In turn, that should increase
the magnetic field by altering the movement of the Cooper pairs.
Could that explain Tate's measurement? To fit her findings, de Matos
and Tajmar found they had to set the graviton mass to be 10-54
kilograms (Physica C, vol 432, p 167). By comparison, an electron's
mass is about 10-30 kilograms. Although that makes the graviton sound
like a lightweight, it would give superconductors a gravitomagnetic
force 17 orders of magnitude greater than that produced by normal
matter.

At that level, they realised, it should be possible to measure the
field in a laboratory. So they designed an experiment to test the
idea, and built it with funding from the US air force and the
European Space Agency. Last year Tajmar's team began to look for
evidence of their extraordinary prediction - not really expecting to
find it. They set a ring of superconducting niobium spinning, and
positioned accelerometers around the ring. Any gravitomagnetic field
produced by the spinning superconductor should tug on these sensors.

Initially, they ran tests at room temperature, where niobium is not
superconducting, and saw no anomalous readings. That was expected,
consistent with the immeasurably tiny field predicted by general
relativity. Then as they dropped the temperature, Cooper pairs formed
in the niobium and it lost its electrical resistance. Suddenly the
accelerometers produced a signal. It was exactly as they hoped: as
soon as the niobium became superconducting, the instruments appeared
to feel a strong gravitomagnetic field pulling on them
(www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0603033).

It seemed too good to be true. Tajmar's team knew how heretical such
a large gravitomagnetic field would seem to other physicists
(see "The attraction of gravity"). So they began running their
experiment time and time again, looking for any hint of instrumental
problems that might be fooling them. Next, they swapped the niobium
for other superconducting materials, making predictions about the
gravitomagnetic field they expected from each. They included extra
sensors to improve the accuracy of their results and added two laser
gyroscopes to their set-up to best measure the twist
(www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0610015). Every time, the experiment gave
them the right answers.

After 250 runs, they began to believe that perhaps the signals were
real after all. It seemed they had found a way to generate a large
gravitomagnetic field unanticipated by Einstein or anyone else. They
have submitted a paper to the journal Physica C and have been
attending conferences to talk about their work - and met a sceptical
response.

James Overduin, a theorist from Stanford University is doubtful about
the claims. He points to the remarkable strength of the supposed
gravitomagnetic field. "Seventeen orders of magnitude is not to be
sniffed at." At that strength, says Overduin, we would expect to see
gravitomagnetic effects throughout the cosmos. To make the graviton
massive would limit the distance it can travel, and since all
astronomical observations suggest that gravity travels the entire
breadth of the universe, there is a big conflict to resolve.

De Matos counters that the gravitons only gain mass and enhance the
gravitomagnetic effect inside superconductors, which in the universe
would only occur in certain highly compressed dead stars called
neutron stars. "Some models suggest that neutron stars have a
superconducting layer inside them. This would lead to enhanced
gravitomagnetism, but at the moment the observational effects are not
clear because no one has yet done the calculation," he says.

More fundamentally, Overduin points out that introducing massive
gravitons into physics could cause more problems than it solves. "A
massive graviton would mean that you had to rewrite the entire
standard model of particle physics," he says.

Tajmar agrees that it is no trivial thing to do. He points out that
other theorists have proposed that massive gravitons could explain
why the expansion of the universe is accelerating. If confirmed,
their discovery would fundamentally change the way we think about
gravity. It would mean that superconductors generate gravitational
effects differently from normal matter, which would in turn be an
unambiguous pointer towards some quantum theory of gravity, because
until now only an object's total mass has been assumed to determine
its gravitational field. If Tajmar and his collaborators are right,
the arrangement of particles inside a superconductor also matters.

Such a departure from mainstream theory does not impress Overduin. "A
massive graviton gives you huge problems. I wouldn't bet on this work
as a breakthrough," he says.

The best hope for Tajmar and de Matos is that another team will
reproduce their experiment and confirm the anomalous gravitomagnetic
signal. According to Tajmar, several teams have pledged to recreate
the experiments to refute or verify the puzzling signals, but he
won't reveal the identities of these teams for fear of putting them
under undue pressure. "I am very happy with their interest. It shows
that others take us seriously and are willing to spend time on this."

The results could be out in a year or so. If they are positive, it
puts the technology of science fiction on the horizon. Levitating
cars, zero-g playgrounds, tractor beams to pull objects towards you,
glassless windows that use repulsive fields to prevent things passing
through. Let your imagination run riot: a gravitomagnetic device that
works by changing the acceleration and orientation of a
superconductor would be the basis for a general-purpose force field.

The suggestion that gravitomagnetism might one day form the basis of
some new technology evokes a quick reaction from
Everitt: "Absolutely, unquestionably no!" Then, after a pause, he
adds, "But I suppose Simon Newcomb was just as certain in 1900 when
he said that humans would never build a heavier-than-air flying
machine."

Stuart Clark is a science journalist based in the UK
From issue 2577 of New Scientist magazine, 11 November 2006, page 36-
39
The attraction of gravity
Any talk of superconductors producing weird gravitational effects
makes physicists uneasy. A decade ago, Russian scientist Eugene
Podkletnov of Tampere University of Technology in Finland claimed
that a rotating superconductor would partially shield objects from
the Earth's gravitational pull. Before his results were published,
the story of the "anti-gravity device" leaked to the press. In the
ensuing melee, Podkletnov withdrew the paper and returned to Russia.

Other researchers have also run aground after being drawn by the
siren song of superconductors and gravity. In 1989, Huei Peng of the
Institute of Applied Mathematics in Beijing and Douglas Torr of the
University of Alabama in Huntsville published a paper claiming that
gravitational waves in the fabric of space-time should affect
superconductors. This could lead to a new kind of laboratory-based
gravitational wave detector, they said. Raymond Chiao of the
University of California, Merced, has also claimed that such
a "gravity radio" is possible.

No one has succeeded in realising these predictions. "The enthusiasm
for an antigravity device is so great that sometimes people see what
they want to see. You have to exercise a lot of caution," says James
Overduin, a theorist from Stanford University in California.

So in claiming that superconductors have a powerful effect on
gravity, Martin Tajmar of the Austrian Research Centers near Vienna
and Clovis de Matos of the European Space Agency in Paris have
entered a scientific minefield. However, they point out that their
effect is completely unrelated to all the earlier ideas.

Space-time drags
Gravity might already have given scientists a hint of its twisted
side by playing with the orbits of two space probes. The LAGEOS I and
II satellites were designed and launched in the 1980s by NASA and the
Italian Space Agency to map the Earth's gravitational field in
detail, simply by orbiting the planet and being closely tracked by
laser ranging from the ground.

In 1998, after a painstaking analysis of 11 years of data, the
tracking team found that each satellite's highly tilted orbit was
moving around in the direction of Earth's rotation by about 2 metres
per year.

Almost all of that could be accounted for by undulations in Earth's
gravitational field, caused by the uneven distribution of oceans and
mountain ranges. However, after calculating that effect and
subtracting it from the measured movement, there was a little left
over. The extra shift was microscopic, no more than a few nanometres
a year, but it agrees to within 10 per cent of what is predicted by
general relativity. It seems to be evidence that the rotating bulk of
the Earth slowly drags space-time around with it.

The result remain controversial, however, with some scientists
questioning whether the shift from the oceans and mountains can
really be calculated so precisely.

...................................................................
Interesting reading...
Paul...
...................................................................

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/784 - Release Date: 5/1/2007 2:57 PM

Published with BlogMailr

Shields up! British working on energy deflectors for spaceships

Founder — Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:13:00 GMT

SciFi.com has a cool article:

If the British have their way, we'll never have any superheroes created by cosmic-ray mishaps in space. Scientists from across the pond are working on a Star Trek-like energy shield that would protect spacecraft from harmful — and potentially superpower-bestowing — radiation.

Read the rest here...

FW: [SPACE_ACTION] Chicago Mayor Daley Gives Approval For Creation Of Meigs Spaceport

Founder — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:23:17 GMT

v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

Chicago Mayor Daley Gives Approval For Creation Of Meigs Spaceport

"What Do I Care -- As Long As They Launch Over The Lake"

ANN 04.01.07 SPECIAL EDITION: In a move heralded by space enthusiasts and land-use advocates alike, on Sunday -- the fourth anniversary of the bulldozing of Meigs Field -- Chicago mayor Richard Daley signed a bill authorizing the creation of a commercial spaceport on the land once occupied by the hallowed general aviation airport.

"This way, we can attract attention to our noble city as a technological marvel -- and less a corrupt, mafia-inspired, Midwestern version of Brooklyn -- and bring in some big bucks as well," Daley said in an April 1 press conference.

"I admit, our city has felt a financial hit from losing the money pilots flying into Meigs used to spend when it was an airport," Daley added, almost as an afterthought. "OK, my bad. But I still say those little airplanes posed a clear and present danger to the security and safety of the citizens of this city!"

When one reporter pointed out the potential risk posed by speeding tubes filled with explosive rocket fuel, Daley shrugged. "What do I care? As long as they launch 'em over Lake Michigan, it's not my problem."

Set to open in 2010, the Richard Daley Commemorative Meigs Spaceport will sport two concrete reinforced launchpads, as well as an 8,000-foot runway for use by spacecraft similar to Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo.

"But no airplanes!" Daley trumpted before being escorted to a lunch meeting by staffers. "I'll eat my tie before another airplane ever lands at Meigs!"

AOPA President Phil Boyer, in attendance at the news conference, promptly offered the mayor his tie, but his offer was gruffly declined.

FMI: www.daleyspaceport.com

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 3/31/2007 8:54 PM

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/743 - Release Date: 4/2/2007 4:24 PM

Published with BlogMailr

FW: [Joe Cell Free Energy Device] Self running air engine website & prototype ready to be built

Founder — Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:12:03 GMT

Passing on!

Greetings and to anyone that is interested. Here is a webpage about
Kim Zorzi's air engine invention concept. This engine concept is
self-running and self fueling. This webpage was created on PESWiki
by Pure Energy Systems and www.freeenergynews.com. This webpage was
created on March 13, 2007 and also appeared on www.freeenergynews.com
as a news article for people all over the world to see.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Generator_from_Ambient_Air_by_K
im_Zorzi

For anyone that would like to contact Kim directly, here is his
contact information. His personal email is ULAmerica@aol.com. His
direct phone # is 979-921-0001. Kim Zorzi's contact information is
listed at the bottom of the above website also. I have been in
personal contact with Kim for about two years now. He is a good
friend of mine. Kim is an inventor, pilot, and has an engineering
background. He lives near Houston, Texas, USA.

I am trying to help him find financial funding, so that he can build
a prototype of the air engine, hopefully within the next six months
or so. Kim's concept is open sourced and free for the entire world.
Kim will not hold back any information and he shares all information
with anyone that is interested. Kim and I would personally like to
see this technology used everywhere in the world, especially in
places where people need it the most.

According to Kim's latest estimates he can build a prototype for
around $10,000 - $25,000. This type of prototype can produce about
100 kilowatts or more of energy. The engine can be scaled up and
designed to produce larger amounts of power as well. Kim is willing
to work with other people to build the air engine as well.

Good Journey to all and God Bless,

Jesse Small of Maryland / Virginia

IMPORTANT note: For anyone that reads this and that wants to help,
please share this information with as many people as you know and
post it on other energy forums and groups. Once financial funding is
found, and a prototype is built and if the concept is proven, this
technology will benefit millions of people all around the world.
Technologies such as this belong to people everywhere, especially
those in need.

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 3/31/2007 8:54 PM

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 3/31/2007 8:54 PM

Published with BlogMailr

FW: [JoesCell2] emission free airplane (fuel cell)

Founder — Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:59:28 GMT

Check this out.... If a plane is doing it many sure to follow.

http://boeingmedia.com/imageDetail.cfm?id=14790&clr=release

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 3/31/2007 8:54 PM

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 3/31/2007 8:54 PM

Published with BlogMailr

SEG Model Working!

Founder — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:27:00 GMT

There is a complete article on PES Networks Inc's site. Here is a quote:

Mock-up completion marks the first time since 1963 that a roller has rotated about a ring continuously. To be followed in a few months by a full 15 kW SEG generator capable of cheaply and safely producing electricity without fuel, pollution, friction, or noise.

I've also opened a forum entry for anyone that wants to talk about it.

Air Powered Cars?

Founder — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:22:00 GMT

Episode of the "Beyond Tomorrow" series on two versions of Air powered cars

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmqpGZv0YT4&NR

"Energy from the Vacuum TM" Documentary Series

Founder — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 04:41:00 GMT

CIRCULATE WIDELY

We are pleased to announce the release of the first DVD in the "Energy from the Vacuum TM" Documentary Series, based on the book of the same name by Tom Bearden.

Exquisitely filmed by Oscar-nominated Director William Gazecki in widescreen format with two cameras, and working with a six-figure budget, this tells the story of this ultimate source of energy as it has never been told before.

For over two hours, Tom Bearden, John Bedini, Walter Rosenthal and Peter Lindemann D.Sc. walk us through the science and the history of this "field that is not a field," going back to the 1800's.

And Tom gives us some fascinating glimpses into how he got started on this life-long research quest, plus tells us everything we ever wanted to know about his Patented Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (the MEG).

For further information, production photos, and to order the Disc in time for Xmas, go to:

http://www.energyfromthevacuum.com

Modestly priced at $29, this is the perfect gift for anyone who cares about the future of the planet, or who has any curiosity.

Regards

Tony Craddock
Energetic Productions LLC

DISCOVERING MAGNETISM

Founder — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:55:00 GMT

This fascinating video was recently donated to Cheniere Media by Howard Johnson, the world-renowned researcher into magnetism.

In it, Howard demonstrates a number of his unique magnetic gates, which accelerate cars on tracks using the little-known ability of magnets to fire bursts of energy like guns. These forces are what Nobellist Richard Feynman termed "exchange forces", and they can be up to a thousand times stronger than the base magnetic strength. With the camera running, one of the cars even accelerates from rest loaded with a 35 pound lead weight.

Filmed at Virginia Tech over 20 years ago, and hosted by Dr. Gerhard Beyer, Distinguished Professor and co-researcher, and one of the original atomic bomb scientists, the DVD also shows how the team of Beyer, Johnson and Davis actually performed their ground breaking work of mapping the real magnetic fields of magnets. These are actually very different and much more complex than those that have been taught to most of us.

The video has been digitally re-mastered and converted to DVD, and also contains some provocative End Notes. It is compelling viewing for any person of any age who has some curiosity about how things work.

And it makes a great companion piece to Howard Johnson's book "The Secret World of Magnets" if you have already purchased this.

Available exclusively from The Tom Bearden Website in both NTSC and PAL formats, the running time is 20 minutes.

http://www.cheniere.org/sales/buy-dm.htm

Regards

Tony Craddock
Director
Cheniere Media/ The Tom Bearden Website
www.cheniere.org

Dancing robots!

Founder — Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:12:00 GMT

This is absolutely amazing. The subtle movements are what impressed me the most. Take a look! It's on YouTube.com

John Titor - Myth or Reality?

Founder — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:34:00 GMT

http://johntitor.com/

NOTED PROFESSOR RONALD MALLET ECHOES JOHN TITOR'S PHYSICS AND PREDICTION FOR TIME TRAVEL THIS CENTURY!!

First John Titor said it and now Ronald Mallett, noted scientist and professor agrees! TIme travel may be possible and there is no paradox when traveling in time.

"Personal" supercomputer should run Vista okay

Founder — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:32:00 GMT

POSTED on SciFi.com Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Related Entries: Personal Computers

Read the blog entry here...

Keith Barrows

Apollo Landing Sites from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

Missing lunar tapes finally revealed

TED Talks

[Antigravity_open-source] Gravities Secret...

Shields up! British working on energy deflectors for spaceships

FW: [SPACE_ACTION] Chicago Mayor Daley Gives Approval For Creation Of Meigs Spaceport

Chicago Mayor Daley Gives Approval For Creation Of Meigs Spaceport

"What Do I Care -- As Long As They Launch Over The Lake"

FW: [Joe Cell Free Energy Device] Self running air engine website & prototype ready to be built

FW: [JoesCell2] emission free airplane (fuel cell)

SEG Model Working!

Air Powered Cars?

&quot;Energy from the Vacuum TM&quot; Documentary Series

DISCOVERING MAGNETISM

Dancing robots!

John Titor - Myth or Reality?

"Personal" supercomputer should run Vista okay

"Energy from the Vacuum TM" Documentary Series