<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Tax Industry Talk</title>
<link>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/</link>
<description>The Forum for the Tax Preparation Community</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:20:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>

<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TaxIndustryTalk" /><feedburner:info uri="taxindustrytalk" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>TaxIndustryTalk</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
<title />
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/Fd02NtNpUBc/faster-irs-refunds-in-2010--based-on-the-irs-cade-refund-cycle-flow-chart-and-2010-refund-schedule-it-appears-that-refunds.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2009/12/faster-irs-refunds-in-2010--based-on-the-irs-cade-refund-cycle-flow-chart-and-2010-refund-schedule-it-appears-that-refunds.html</guid>
<description>Faster IRS Refunds in 2010! Based on the IRS CADE Refund Cycle Flow Chart and 2010 Refund Schedule. It appears that refunds will be direct deposited in 5-6 days from the date of IRS Acknowledgement. IRS CADE Refund Cycle Flow:...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faster IRS Refunds in 2010!<br/><br />
<br/><br />
Based on the IRS CADE Refund Cycle Flow Chart and 2010 Refund Schedule. It appears that refunds will be direct deposited in 5-6 days from the date of IRS Acknowledgement.<br/><br />
<br/><br />
IRS CADE Refund Cycle Flow:<br/><br />
<br/><br />
Day 1 - Return transmitted and accepted by 11:00 AM - Return goes to GMF*<br/><br />
<br/><br />
Day 2 - Balance & Control (B&C) Performed-Return posts to CADE if Balanced<br/><br />
<br/><br />
Day 6 - Direct deposits are sent four business days after return posts to CADE**<br/><br />
<br/><br />
Day 8 – Paper checks are sent six business days after return posts to CADE**<br/><br />
<br/><br />
* - If it is a weekend or holiday, the return will go in the next business day’s GMF run.<br/><br />
<br/><br />
** - The IRS does not guarantee a specific date that a refund will be deposited into a taxpayer&#39;s financial institution<br/><br />
account or mailed.<br/><br />
<br/><br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/Fd02NtNpUBc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:20:30 -0800</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2009/12/faster-irs-refunds-in-2010--based-on-the-irs-cade-refund-cycle-flow-chart-and-2010-refund-schedule-it-appears-that-refunds.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>IRS 2009 Nationwide Tax Forums</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/cnGhwgCevwo/irs-2009-nationwide-tax-forums.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2009/02/irs-2009-nationwide-tax-forums.html</guid>
<description>Be sure to visit The Income Tax School www.theincometaxschool.com in the Exhibit Hall at the IRS Nationwide Tax Forums (exhibiting at all Tax Forums except NYC). Complete information about the 2009 Tax Froums is available at the following link: http://www.taxforuminfo.com/</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be sure to visit The Income Tax School <a href="http://www.theincometaxschool.com/">www.theincometaxschool.com</a> in the Exhibit Hall at the IRS Nationwide Tax Forums (exhibiting at all Tax Forums except NYC). Complete information about the 2009 Tax Froums is available at the following link: <a href="http://www.taxforuminfo.com/">http://www.taxforuminfo.com/</a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/cnGhwgCevwo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:49:03 -0800</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2009/02/irs-2009-nationwide-tax-forums.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Which is worse for tax preparers, the McCain or Obama tax plan?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/UNNNZHkFY9s/which-is-worse-for-tax-preparers-the-mccain-or-obama-tax-plan.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/10/which-is-worse-for-tax-preparers-the-mccain-or-obama-tax-plan.html</guid>
<description>The Obama Tax Plan "...could significantly reduce the workload of some tax accountants and push others out of business altigether..." according to an article in the September 22 issue of Accounting Today (see full article at link below). In a...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama Tax Plan &quot;...could significantly reduce the workload of some tax accountants and push others out of business altigether...&quot; according to an article in the September 22 issue of Accounting Today (see full article at link below).&#0160; In a previous post in Tax Industry Talk, an article was referenced regarding McCain&#39;s desire to enable taxpayers to eliminate the cost of tax preparers. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?articleid=29138&amp;pg=ros">http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?articleid=29138&amp;pg=ros</a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/UNNNZHkFY9s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<category>Tax Business Legislation</category>

<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:29:16 -0700</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/10/which-is-worse-for-tax-preparers-the-mccain-or-obama-tax-plan.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>IRS Regulation of Tax Preparers Coming Soon?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/8yZr7r1GEHI/irs-regulation-of-tax-preparers-coming-soon.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/10/irs-regulation-of-tax-preparers-coming-soon.html</guid>
<description>Will the Congress soon pass legislation to require the IRS to regulate unenrolled tax preparers? According to an Accounting Today article (link below) the recent GAO "study results boost preparer registration movement," and the Oregon model is viewed as the...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="page-title">
<h5>Will the Congress soon pass legislation to require the IRS to regulate unenrolled tax preparers?&#0160; According to an Accounting Today article (link below) the recent GAO &quot;study results boost preparer registration movement,&quot; and the Oregon model is viewed as the most likely to be adopted by IRS.</h5>
<p>
<h5>Do you think regulation of tax preparers is likely?</h5></p>
<p>
<h5>How would this impact the tax industry?</h5></p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?articleid=29434&amp;pg=ros">http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?articleid=29434&amp;pg=ros</a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/8yZr7r1GEHI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<category>Tax Business Legislation</category>

<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:32:01 -0700</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/10/irs-regulation-of-tax-preparers-coming-soon.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>McCain would eliminate tax preparers - Should tax preparers vote for him?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/Ia0G8gbvnjo/mccain-would-eliminate-tax-preparers---is-that-q-reason-for-tax-preparers-not-to-vote-for-him.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/10/mccain-would-eliminate-tax-preparers---is-that-q-reason-for-tax-preparers-not-to-vote-for-him.html</guid>
<description>Tax simplification has been a mainstay of McCain's stump speeches since April, when he backed creation of an optional second tax system based on a two-rate structure. "We will simplify the tax code so people can understand it and do...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax simplification has been a mainstay of McCain&#39;s stump speeches since April, when he backed creation of an optional second tax system based on a two-rate structure. &quot;We will simplify the tax code so people can understand it and do their tax returns themselves,&quot; McCain said in a September speech.</p>
<p>Full article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taxanalysts.com/www/features.nsf/Articles/386A174BD7DB9233852574DC004D2374?OpenDocument">http://www.taxanalysts.com/www/features.nsf/Articles/386A174BD7DB9233852574DC004D2374?OpenDocument</a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/Ia0G8gbvnjo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:49:44 -0700</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/10/mccain-would-eliminate-tax-preparers---is-that-q-reason-for-tax-preparers-not-to-vote-for-him.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>2008 IRS Nationwide Tax Forums Starting Soon</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/28-Zs6_8Z44/2008-irs-nation.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/06/2008-irs-nation.html</guid>
<description>The first of six IRS Tax Forums will be held in Atlanta July 1-3, 2008. Other events will be held in Chicago, Orlando, Las Vegas, New York and San Diego. These events will offer the latest word on new tax...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first of six IRS Tax Forums will be held in Atlanta July 1-3, 2008. Other events will be held in Chicago, Orlando, Las Vegas, New York and San Diego.</p>

<p>These events will offer the latest
word on new tax law and e-file as well as compliance and ethics issues.
Attendees will also have the opportunity to interact with IRS executives,
network with peers and receive Continuing Professional Education (CPE) credits.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Nationwide, more than 15,000 tax professionals participated
in the tax forums last year and survey responses showed that 98 percent were
satisfied with the forums. Attendees also said the forums enabled them to meet
their clients’ needs more professionally and with more technical expertise.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">On-line registration, other forum dates, and more
details are available at:<a href="http://www.taxforuminfo.com/">IRS TAx Forum Website</a>  </p>

<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>

<br />

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/28-Zs6_8Z44" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<category>"In the News" Tax Issues</category>

<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:10:32 -0700</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/06/2008-irs-nation.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>News From the Maryland Association of CPAs Re: Maryland Individual Tax Preparers Act</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/vx3cNVBmYok/news-from-the-m.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/05/news-from-the-m.html</guid>
<description>New regulation for Maryland tax preparers? Maryland's 2008 legislative session rolls along, and it looks like one issue on the MACPA's radar screen -- the Maryland Individual Tax Preparers Act -- might be moving toward passage. That bill would create...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="entry-header">New regulation for Maryland tax preparers?</h3>

<div class="entry-content"><div class="entry-body"><p><img title="Flag" alt="Flag" src="http://cpasuccess.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/20/flag.jpg" border="0" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 5px 5px" />Maryland's 2008 legislative session rolls along, and it looks like one issue on <a href="http://www.macpa.org/"><span style="color: #003366;">the MACPA's</span></a> radar screen -- the <a href="http://mlis.state.md.us/2008rs/billfile/HB1447.htm"><span style="color: #003366;">Maryland Individual Tax Preparers Act</span></a> -- might be moving toward passage.</p>

<p>That bill would create a &quot;State Board of Individual Tax Preparers&quot; in the <a href="http://www.dllr.state.md.us/"><span style="color: #003366;">Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation</span></a> to oversee the efforts of all state tax preparers. The bill is meant to protect the state's taxpayers.</p>

<p>The MACPA supports the bill in general, provided some amendments are factored in. Since CPAs are already regulated by the <a href="http://www.dllr.state.md.us/license/occprof/account.html"><span style="color: #003366;">State Board of Public Accountancy</span></a>, for instance, they should be exempt from the requirements put forth in the bill -- which makes sense. Our sister blog, Legislative Insider, <a href="http://www.cpalegislativeinsider.com/2008/03/day-70-of-sessi.html"><span style="color: #003366;">outlines the MACPA's position on the bill in detail</span></a>.</p>

<p>So does <a href="http://www.mddailyrecord.com/article.cfm?id=4749&amp;type=UTTM"><span style="color: #003366;">a recent <em>Daily Record</em> article</span></a> by Andy Rosen. Here's what Rosen wrote:</p><blockquote dir="ltr"><p><em>At first, the bill met with concern from tax preparers who are already licensed, such as CPAs, federally regulated enrolled agents and tax attorneys. </em></p>

<p><em>CPAs, for instance, are regulated by the State Board of Public Accountancy. </em></p>

<p><em>&quot;Our issue is, we don’t want to have CPAs in a position of being double regulated,&quot; said J. Thomas Hood III, executive director and CEO of the Maryland Association of CPAs. He said his organization could support the proposal after an exemption was carved out for CPAs, and their employees. </em></p>

<p><em>The association pushed for other amendments, including one that would require public education about the bill. Those amendments are contained in the Senate proposal. Hood added that he thinks the registry should cover people who prepare business as well as individual returns.</em></p></blockquote><p dir="ltr">What do <em>you</em> think about the bill?</p></div></div>

<p class="entry-footer"><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/typepad/cpasuccess?i=http://www.cpasuccess.com/2008/03/new-regulation.html" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script><br /></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/vx3cNVBmYok" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<category>Tax Business Legislation</category>

<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 07:57:45 -0700</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/05/news-from-the-m.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Does the Ability to Download W-2s Give National Tax Firms an Unfair Competitive Advantage Over Independents?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/6d63dg2EQv4/does-the-abilit.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/04/does-the-abilit.html</guid>
<description>Here is the question posed by independent tax preparer, Tom Leesburg of Florida: Do you address downloading W-2's. Do you address how the independents can compete with Jackson Hewitt downloading ADP W-2s and we cannot? I use [tax software], their...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the question posed by independent tax preparer, Tom Leesburg of Florida:</p>

<p>Do you address downloading W-2's.&nbsp; Do you address how the independents can compete with Jackson Hewitt downloading ADP W-2s and we cannot?&nbsp; I use [tax software], their payroll company is ADP and they do not even know about downloading ADP W-2's. I have been asking for this for four years and I have found sites on my own, but the problem is the large companies unfairly competing by downloading or using the last paystub to file the return (claiming that they are downloading). Even turbotax is offering this service, what the average preparer is not aware of is that the ability to file from the last paystub is driving people to websites like TurboTax. </p>

<div></div>

<div>What are your thoughts?</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/6d63dg2EQv4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<category>Tax Business Strategies</category>

<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:06:00 -0700</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/04/does-the-abilit.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Tax Preparer Regulation Reintroduced to Congress</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/YP5qJv-hj8Y/tax-preparer-re.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/04/tax-preparer-re.html</guid>
<description>What are the implications for Tax Professionals? New Taxpayer Bill of Rights Introduced (Source: NATP) On April 7, Congressman Becerra introduced his Taxpayer Bill of Rights Act H.R. 5716 in the House. This bill is the latest development in Congressional...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #006633;"></span></strong></p>

<p><strong><span style="color: #006633;"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">What are the implications for Tax Professionals?</span></span></strong></p>

<p><strong><span style="color: #006633;"><p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">New Taxpayer Bill of Rights Introduced (Source: NATP)</span></p></span></strong></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span face="Verdana" style="color: #000000;font-size: 0.8em;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">On April 7, Congressman Becerra introduced his <em><em><span face="Verdana"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Taxpayer Bill of Rights Act</span></span></em></em> H.R. 5716 in the House. This bill is the latest development in Congressional efforts to license tax return preparers.&nbsp; It is significant in that it also represents the first time under this administration that the House of Representatives has introduced licensure legislation.&nbsp; There is now a bill in both the House and the Senate.&nbsp; You should know that NATP has been working with Congressman Becerra and his staff since last year, giving comments on the provisions proposed in this bill and representing the interests of all tax professionals whether licensed or unlicensed.&nbsp; While we did not get consideration for all of our observations, we are gratified that a great many of our comments and concerns were addressed.&nbsp; This bill allows the Treasury and the IRS wide latitude in its implementation.&nbsp; </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span face="Verdana" style="color: #000000;font-size: 0.8em;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">The <em><em><span face="Verdana"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Taxpayer Bill of Rights Act of 2008</span></span></em></em> contains a variety of provisions aimed at improving services for taxpayers, particularly those with low or moderate incomes. In addition to licensing, it would protect taxpayers from lenders of refund anticipation loans (RALs) who act unscrupulously.&nbsp; The bill would also clarify taxpayer rights and obligations, establish a grant program for free tax preparation and representation clinics, and help provide access to financial institutions for low-income taxpayers without a bank account.&nbsp; </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span face="Verdana" style="color: #000000;font-size: 0.8em;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">We will continue to monitor this bill as well as S. 1219 in the Senate and report to you on their progress.&nbsp; We will also continue to comment as we meet with Congressional leaders on a regular basis.&nbsp; </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span face="Verdana" style="color: #000000;font-size: 0.8em;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">H. R. 5716, <em><em><span face="Verdana"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">The Taxpayer Bill of Rights Act</span></span></em></em>, as well as the House of Representative’s prepared Fact Sheet summarizing the key provisions of the bill are available at the NATP website. </span></span></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/YP5qJv-hj8Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<category>Tax Business Legislation</category>

<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:23:56 -0700</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/04/tax-preparer-re.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>IRS Enhanced Standards of Conduct for Tax Return Preparers--What will this mean for tax preparers?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~3/OkcLyNZ4pK8/irs-enhanced-st.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/01/irs-enhanced-st.html</guid>
<description>On December 31, 2007, IRS announced that it plans to overhaul rules regarding tax preparer penalties and conduct. The IRS news release included the following statements: “The plan to take a fresh look at the preparer penalty regulations will be...</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 31, 2007, IRS announced that it plans to overhaul rules regarding tax preparer penalties and conduct. The IRS news release included the following statements: </p>

<p><span face="Arial">“The plan to take a fresh look at the preparer penalty regulations will be a top priority for us in 2008,” said IRS Chief Counsel Don Korb. “We look forward to receiving comments from all interested parties on their recommendations for the final regulations. Our goal is to complete our work on the overhaul of these rules by the end of 2008,” he said.</span></p>

<p><span face="Arial">For undisclosed positions on a tax return, the new law replaced the realistic possibility standard with a requirement that there be a reasonable belief that the tax treatment of the position would more likely than not be sustained on its merits. In cases in which the taxpayer discloses the position on the tax return, the notice implements the new law that states there must be a reasonable basis for the tax treatment of the position taken on the tax return.</span></p>

<p><span face="Arial">Will these new rules place undue burden on tax preparers to interpret the law and take more conservative positions?&nbsp; &nbsp;Or will they help to prevent tax preparers from encouraging their clients to take questionable tax positions?&nbsp; Should tax preparers be put in the position of making such judgements?</span></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TaxIndustryTalk/~4/OkcLyNZ4pK8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Charles  McCabe</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:04:10 -0800</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://taxindustrytalk.theincometaxschool.com/my_weblog/2008/01/irs-enhanced-st.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
