<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tech PR Review | Tech PR Blog</title> <link>http://www.techprreview.com</link> <description>Tech PR and Tech Marketing analysis, criticism, praise and best-practices</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechPRreview" /><feedburner:info uri="techprreview" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Branding Evolution – Part 2</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/okBHVLkiOoE/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/23/branding-evolution-part-2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crisis / Ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[innovate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology pr]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=423</guid> <description>The previous Tech PR Review post discussed how branding roles have evolved and argued that PR has supplanted all other business processes as the most important factor in developing a brand.  Today, branding is no longer just about brand building or brand awareness.  The last decade has seen a huge rise in how people get [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/okBHVLkiOoE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/23/branding-evolution-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/23/branding-evolution-part-2/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Branding Evolution – Part 1</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/Z430uXGXNks/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/16/branding-evolution/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:55:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crisis / Ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology pr]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=414</guid> <description>The marketing term &amp;#8220;branding&amp;#8221; and the process of branding have long been married to the term &amp;#8220;advertising&amp;#8221; instead of public relations.  Unfortunately, a partial reason for this is that &amp;#8211; to the general public &amp;#8211; advertising has a history of being more recognized than public relations.  After all, advertising is everywhere whereas PR has a [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/Z430uXGXNks" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/16/branding-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/16/branding-evolution/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Kodak Tries to Figure Out Where it Belongs</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/YEfErcNV3Jw/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/09/kodak-tries-to-figure-out-where-it-belongs/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:20:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crisis / Ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[innovate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology pr]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=408</guid> <description>So, Kodak is exiting the camera and digital frames business.  For many folks, Kodak is (perhaps &amp;#8220;was&amp;#8221; is more appropriate) like an institution.  Back in the day, one could not talk about pictures without thinking or mentioning Kodak.  It&amp;#8217;s unfortunate that the old &amp;#8220;innovate or die&amp;#8221; mantra may consume this industry giant as well. There [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/YEfErcNV3Jw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/09/kodak-tries-to-figure-out-where-it-belongs/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/02/09/kodak-tries-to-figure-out-where-it-belongs/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Do You Need Tech PR?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/6B_42FlvDYI/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/31/do-you-need-tech-pr/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tactics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology pr]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=385</guid> <description>Does your company and / or its product(s) need PR?  This is a question many executives over-complicate and struggle with.  There are many perspectives to consider too.  Regardless, PR is the best method for building and sustaining market credibility, a market position, general awareness, etc.  Still, many folks struggle with figuring out if and why [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/6B_42FlvDYI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/31/do-you-need-tech-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/31/do-you-need-tech-pr/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Is RIM On the Verge of Having its Blackberries Cut Off?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/fAB0B9aUUi0/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/26/is-rim-on-the-verge-of-having-its-blackberries-cut-off/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Analyst relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[differentiate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[innovate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Media Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=379</guid> <description>A story earlier this week noted that RIM, makers of the Blackberry phones, plans new software and devices late this year.  The general theme of the story is that the new CEO is confident the new software that was planned before he got there is a good plan to keep &amp;#8211; that no seismic changes [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/fAB0B9aUUi0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/26/is-rim-on-the-verge-of-having-its-blackberries-cut-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/26/is-rim-on-the-verge-of-having-its-blackberries-cut-off/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Crisis Communications and Best Laid Plans</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/NTpSl4njxoc/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/19/crisis-communications-and-best-laid-plans/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Crisis / Ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tactics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Media Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology pr]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=373</guid> <description>Symantec was recently &amp;#8220;caught&amp;#8221; backtracking about their network being hacked, first stating they were not hacked and then having to come back and acknowledge they were hacked.  It&amp;#8217;s created a crisis communications scenario that could turn worse. There are many possible scenarios, responses and other elements to consider during a crisis &amp;#8211; far too many [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/NTpSl4njxoc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/19/crisis-communications-and-best-laid-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/19/crisis-communications-and-best-laid-plans/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>PR Agency or Consultant: Which Shall it Be?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/nn424j8XFXU/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/11/pr-agency-or-consultant-which-shall-it-be/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:23:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tactics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Analyst relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Media Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[research]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology pr]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=368</guid> <description>Shall we retain a PR agency or PR consultant?  That&amp;#8217;s an initial question many companies have to answer when they start trying to find technology PR help.  There are advantages and disadvantages to both and it&amp;#8217;s not possible to cover everything in one blog post.  But, let&amp;#8217;s touch upon some potential advantages, disadvantages and misconceptions [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/nn424j8XFXU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/11/pr-agency-or-consultant-which-shall-it-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/11/pr-agency-or-consultant-which-shall-it-be/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Yahoo to Re-Emerge?  What About Barnes &amp; Noble?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/4K4qgAt6DOg/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/05/yahoo-to-re-emerge-what-about-barnes-noble/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:54:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tactics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Analyst relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[innovate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=362</guid> <description>Will Yahoo Continue to be a Yahoo? A story yesterday on CNET about Yahoo&amp;#8217;s soon-to-be CEO might have one thinking the company is getting its mojo back.  The story opens with an attributed promise from the to-be CEO that &amp;#8220;Yahoo will become a technology giant again, helping to shape how people use the Internet in [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/4K4qgAt6DOg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/05/yahoo-to-re-emerge-what-about-barnes-noble/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2012/01/05/yahoo-to-re-emerge-what-about-barnes-noble/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Holiday Hodgepodge: Chrome Beats Rivals; Microsoft Dumps CES; 2011 Tech CEO Bozos</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/IdUYS6zt6mg/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2011/12/22/holiday-hodgepodge-chrome-beats-rivals-microsoft-dumps-ces-2011-tech-ceo-bozos/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:20:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Crisis / Ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Trade Show]]></category> <category><![CDATA[branding]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[differentiate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[innovate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[positioning]]></category> <category><![CDATA[technology pr]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=353</guid> <description>During this holiday season, we have a hodgepodge of stories to cover for their PR and marketing value.  Enjoy and happy holidays! Chrome is the #1 Browser &amp;#8211; Really A story in PC World states Ireland-based StatCounter ranks Google&amp;#8217;s Chrome browser as the world&amp;#8217;s most popular browser edition.  This appears to be based on global [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/IdUYS6zt6mg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2011/12/22/holiday-hodgepodge-chrome-beats-rivals-microsoft-dumps-ces-2011-tech-ceo-bozos/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2011/12/22/holiday-hodgepodge-chrome-beats-rivals-microsoft-dumps-ces-2011-tech-ceo-bozos/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Top 9 Tech Stories of 2011 – the PR Perspective</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechPRreview/~3/iRkUQBgmAs4/</link> <comments>http://www.techprreview.com/2011/12/15/top-9-tech-stories-of-2011-the-pr-perspective/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tech PR Review</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Crisis / Ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Hi Tech PR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tactics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Media Relations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tech PR]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprreview.com/?p=341</guid> <description>PC World New Zealand ran a story where IDG picked the top nine technology stories of the year.  Some included politics and legal fights.  Of course, the passing of Steve Jobs made the list and a few other memorable stories were included.  Let&amp;#8217;s analyze them for their PR value, or lack thereof. PlayStation Network Hacks [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechPRreview/~4/iRkUQBgmAs4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.techprreview.com/2011/12/15/top-9-tech-stories-of-2011-the-pr-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.techprreview.com/2011/12/15/top-9-tech-stories-of-2011-the-pr-perspective/</feedburner:origLink></item> </channel> </rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using disk: basic

Served from: www.techprreview.com @ 2012-02-23 19:00:52 -->

