Technology and Gadgets

Critics of the technology

2008-05-04T13:50:00.000+07:00

Critics of the technology is a theory that critical technology for alleged negative impact in terms of advanced technological development. Proponents of this theory argue that in all advanced industrial societies (whether capitalist or not) the technology is or becomes a means of domination, control and exploitation, or more generally something that threatens the survival of the humanity. In a broader sense a sceptical vis-à-vis the technology that is not necessarily fully developed theory may also be linked to criticism of the technology.

In Europe sceptical attitudes toward technology has become more important in the years 1970, for example in anti-nuclear movements. In the eyes of some critics, the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 seems to confirm the impossibility of controlling large-scale technology. The Internet euphoria of 1990's has encouraged more positive attitudes toward technology. But fears about rising possibilities of surveillance technology are still widespread.

The authors develop a critique of technology are, for example. Günther Anders, Jacques Ellul and Lewis Mumford. In a broader sense some writings of Martin Heidegger and the history of critical technology (David F. Noble) are also part of the critique of technology.

Criticism of the technology is a variant of the critical progress that goes back at least to Rousseau.

In the years 1970 to the USA, the critique of technology has become the basis of a new political perspective called anarcho-primitivism, which was passed by thinkers such as Fredy Perlman, John Zerzan, and George Bradford alias David Watson . All former Marxist, they have proposed various theories on how it was the industrial society, not capitalism as such, which was the source of contemporary social problems. This theory was developed in the newspaper Fifth Estate in the years 1970 and 1980, and was influenced by the Frankfurt School, Jacques Ellul and others.

Criticism of technology overlap with the philosophy of technology but that he tries to establish itself as an academic discipline criticism of the technology is fundamentally a political project, not only for universities. It figures prominently in Neomarxism (Herbert Marcuse), ecofeminism (Vandana Shiva) and postdevelopment (Ivan Illich)

Technology Others Use

2008-05-04T13:40:00.000+07:00

Handa, M.L. (1986) introduced the concept of "social paradigm" in the context of social sciences. He identified the basic elements of a social paradigm. Like Kuhn, Handa addressed the issue of changing paradigm, the process popularly known as "paradigm shift". In this regard, he emphasized the social conditions that precipitate such a change and the effects of transition on social institutions, including the institution of education. This vast change in the social sphere, in turn, changes the way the individual perceives reality.

Another use of the word paradigm is a sense of spirituality (German for the vision of the world). For example, in the social sciences, the term is used to describe all the experiences, beliefs and values that affect how an individual perceives reality and responds to this perception. Social scientists have adopted the Kuhnian "paradigm shift" to describe a change in how a given society is to organize and understand the reality. A "dominant paradigm" refers to values, or system of thought, in a society which are more standard and widely held at a given time. Dominant paradigms are shaped by the cultural community and the historical context of the moment. The following are conditions that facilitate a system of thought of becoming a dominant paradigm accepted:

* The professional organizations that give legitimacy to the paradigm
* Dynamic leaders who claim to put in place and the paradigm
* The newspapers and editors who write on the system of thought. They both disseminate information essential to the paradigm and gives legitimacy paradigm
* Government agencies that give credence to the paradigm
* The paradigm educators who propagate the ideas of teachers to students
* Conferences, which are conducted to review ideas central to the paradigm
* The media coverage
* Lay groups, or groups around the concerns of the laity, which include beliefs central to the paradigm
* Sources of funding for further research on the paradigm

The word paradigm is also still used to indicate a template or model or an exceptionally clear or typical example or archetype. The term is frequently used in this sense in the design professions. Design Paradigms or archetypes are precedents for functional design solutions. The most famous references on the design paradigms are Design Paradigms: A Sourcebook for the creation of display, Wake, and Design Paradigms by Petroski.

This term is also used in cybernetics. Here, it means (in a very broad sense) a (conceptual) protoprogramme to reduce the chaotic mass to some form of order. Note similarities to the concept of entropy in chemistry and physics. A paradigm, it would be a sort of prohibition to carry out any action that would increase the total entropy of the system. To create a paradigm, a closed system that accepts any change is necessary. Thus, a paradigm can be applied only from a system that is not in its final phase.

About Gadget

2008-04-04T14:16:00.000+07:00

Gadget South Africa is the first online magazine on consumer technology, office and hi-tech gadgets that make our lives both easier and more complicated.

The "what"

Launched in March 1998, Gadget South Africa is the first online magazine on consumer technology, office and hi-tech gadgets that make our lives both easier and more complicated. He reviewed something pens smart cars, hi-tech laundries low-tech radios.

It also aims to become an educational environment, both for its faithful readers and to a wider audience. Software and hardware reviews are divided into serious and fun products - the most popular gadget - and the coverage of mobile telephony, hi-tech and the World Wide Web.

The site is updated regularly with new features, and an e-mail will digest about 6500 subscribers. You can subscribe by putting your e-mail in the box under "subscription" on this page and clicking on "Sign Up".

The "how"

Our comments focus on the essential issues with their five-user tests, allowing the reader to see at a glance whether the product is:

1. Ready to use

2. Easy to use

3. Functioning as it is supposed to (operating as announced)

4. Innovative

5. Price / quality

From time to time, we Add alarm Enlightenment, where a review or discussion needs a warning or explanatory note. A red light indicates the danger and a warning not to buy a light orange spells caution, which suggests to check the small print before going ahead, while the green light tells you it is safe to passer, whether or not there are dangers apparent.

History Gadget

2008-04-04T14:09:00.000+07:00

The origin of the word "gadget" to back the years 1800. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, there is anecdotal evidence for the use of "gadgets" as a name for a technique which point a name can not remember the years since 1850, with Robert Brown's 1886 book and Spunyarn Spindrift, a sailor boy 'a newspaper travel and hospitality in a tea-China clipper containing the earliest known use of printing. [2] The etymology of the word is disputed. One widely circulated story is of the opinion that the word gadget was "invented" when Gaget, Gauthier & Cie, the company behind the casting of the Statue of Liberty (1886), made a small version of this monument, named after their farm, but this contradicted the evidence that the word has already been used before in marine environments, and the fact that it did not become popular until after the First World War [2] Other sources cite a derivation of the trigger french which has been applied to various pieces of a firing mechanism, or french gagée, a small tool or an accessory. [2] The spring-clip used to store the basis of a vessel during glass-making is also known as a gadget. [edit] The first atomic bomb was nicknamed the gadget by scientists of the Manhattan Project, tested in Trinidad.

Gadget

2008-04-04T14:06:00.000+07:00

A gadget is a small object technology (as a device or appliance), which has a specific function, but is often regarded as a novelty. The gadgets are always regarded as more or exceptionally intelligently designed technology than normal at the time of their invention. The gadgets are sometimes also called gizmos.

Theory of Technological Developments

2008-03-04T14:01:00.000+07:00

The stages of technological development

The pretechnological period, in which all other animal species remain today outside the avian flu and some species of primates was a non-rational period beginning Prehistory | prehistoric man.

The emergence of technology, made possible by the rational development of the faculty, has paved the way for the first stage: the tool. A tool provides a mechanical advantage to perform a physical task, and must be fed by humans or animals.

As hunter-gatherers developed tools mainly for the purchase of food. Tools such as a container, spear, arrow, plough, or hammer, which increases the physical work more effectively to achieve its objective. Later, animal-powered tools such as the cart and the horse, increasing the productivity of food production over ten times the technology hunter-gatherers. These tools enable to do things impossible to achieve with the body of one, like seeing the visual detail minute with a microscope, handling heavy objects with a basket and pulley, or carrying volumes of water in a bucket water.

The second technological step was the creation of the machine. A machine (a machine turned to be more precise) is a tool that replaces the element of physical effort, and requires the operator to control its function. Machines became widespread with the industrial revolution, even if the windmills, a type of machine, are much more.

Examples include cars, trains, computers and lights. Machines to enable man to considerably exceed the limits of their bodies. Put a machine on the farm, a tractor, increasing food productivity at least ten times more technology to plough and the horse.

The third and final stage of technological development is the controller. The controller is a machine that removes the element of human control with an automatic algorithm. Examples of machines that have this feature are digital watches, automatic telephone switches, pacemakers, and computer programs.

It is important to understand that the three steps outline the introduction of the basic types of technology, and so that all three are still widely used today. A spear, a plow, a pen and an optical microscope, are all examples of tools.

Implications theoretical

The process of technological change culminates with the capacity to perform all the material values technically feasible and desirable by the mental effort.

An economy | economic impact of the above idea is that the intellectual work, will become increasingly important in relation to a physical work. The contracts and agreements around the information will become increasingly common market. The expansion and the creation of new types of institutions working with information such as universities, libraries, patents commercial companies, etc is considered as an indication that civilization is an evolving technology.

Interestingly, underscoring the importance stressing the debate on intellectual property in conjunction with the decentralization of distribution systems such as the Internet today. When the price of distributing information to zero with more and more effective tools to disseminate information is invented. Increasing amounts of information are distributed more and more to a wider customer base time passes. With disintermediation increasingly in those markets and growing concerns over the protection of intellectual property rights, it is unclear what form the information to the markets take on the evolution of the information age .

2008-02-04T14:46:00.000+07:00

Features gadget

1. Hierarchical multipolar (on the basis of a geometric October-tree) for gravitational forces.
2. Optional TreePM method, where the tree is used for short-range gravitational forces while only long-term forces are calculated with an FFT-based particle-mesh (h) regime. A second layer PM may be placed on a high resolution region "zoom'-simulations.
3. Periodic boundary conditions, either through the summation Ewald technical or based on the FFT algorithm used in the system TreePM. The simulations only follow the dynamics of gas without self-gravity can be carried out periodically, boxes with arbitrary aspect ratios, and also in 2D, if you wish.
4. Lissées particle hydrodynamics fully with smoothing lengths adaptation and a new formulation of the conservation of the entropy of SPH.
Signal speed setting artificial viscosity, as suggested by Monaghan.
5. Individual timesteps for all particles. Under the TreePM, long distance and short-range forces are integrated at various timesteps.
6. Workload balanced domain decomposition and updates dynamic tree.
7. Effective the cell opening criteria of gravity tree walk.
8. Support for parallel I / O and a number of different output formats, including HDF5 format.
9. Flexible control of all options code by a free-format parameterfile.
10. Portable, well documented and easily extensible code, relying only on ANSI C language features and MPI-1, 0 is the communication.
11. High-speed computing crude and relatively low consumption of memory. In particular, significant improvements in resource consumption compared with HO-1 were achieved.
12. The code May be executed on an arbitrary number of processors, with a restriction of powers of two. It May also be implemented on a single processor in serial fashion.
13. Rapid method for producing a gravity "of glass."
SPH simulations can be exploited in packs periodic arbitrary aspect ratio, or 2D, if you wish.

There were also older versions of the code that supported the special-purpose equipment grapes, in the form of grape-3 and Grape-6. However, this feature is not included in the current version for the moment.

Gadget Description

2008-02-04T14:20:00.000+07:00

Gadget is a code freely available for N-body/SPH cosmological simulations on massively parallel computers memory distributed. HO explicit uses a model of communication which is implemented with the standard MPI communication interface. The code can be run on almost all the super-systems currently in use, including groups of individual workstations or PCs.

HO calculates gravitational forces with a hierarchical tree algorithm (possibly in combination with a mesh-particle system for long-range gravitational forces) and represents fluids through smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). The code can be used for studies of isolated systems, or simulations that include the cosmic expansion of space, whether with or without periodic boundary conditions. In all these types of simulations, gadget follows the evolution of a self-revolving collisionless N-body, and allows the dynamics of gas may be included. Both the strength of calculation and strengthen time gadget are fully coping with a dynamic range that is, in principle, unlimited.

Gadget can be used to treat a wide range of astrophysically interesting problems, ranging from collision and merging galaxies, the formation of large-scale structure in the universe. With the inclusion of other physical processes such as radiation cooling and heating, gadget can also be used to study the dynamics of gas intergalactic medium to address star formation and its regulation by feedback process .

Technological Singularity

2008-02-04T14:03:00.000+07:00

When plotted on a logarithmic chart, 15 separate lists of paradigm shifts for major events in human history show a trend exponentially. Lists prepared by, among others, Carl Sagan, Paul D. Boyer, Encyclopaedia Britannica, American Museum of Natural History and the University of Arizona, compiled by Ray Kurzweil.
When plotted on a logarithmic chart, 15 separate lists of paradigm shifts for major events in human history show a trend exponentially. Lists prepared by, among others, Carl Sagan, Paul D. Boyer, Encyclopaedia Britannica, American Museum of Natural History and the University of Arizona, compiled by Ray Kurzweil.

The technological singularity is a case in the future various characterized by the creation of technological self-improvement of intelligence, unprecedented, rapid technological advances, or a combination of both. [1]

Statistician IJ first writing of "intelligence explosion", suggesting that if the machines could even slightly exceed the human intellect, they could improve their own designs in a way unseen by their designers, and thereby increase recursively self - very much intelligence. Vernor Vinge later called this event "singularity" as an analogy between the distribution of modern physics near a gravitational singularity and the drastic change in society argues it would occur after an explosion of information . In the years 1980, Vinge popularized the singularity in lectures, essays and science fiction. More recently, some researchers Amnesty International expressed concern about the potential dangers of Vinge singularity.

Others, most prominently Ray Kurzweil, define the singularity as a period of extremely rapid technological progress. Kurzweil argues such an event is implied by a long-term model to accelerate the widespread change that Moore's Law technology earlier the integrated circuit, which argues that it will continue with other technologies not yet invented.

Critics of Kurzweil interpretation to consider an example of static analysis, mentioning in particular the failure of forecasts of Moore's Law. Others note that the proponents of the "singularity" tend to ignore all the negative effects of technology, focusing only on the positive effects. The singularity also drew criticism from anarcho-primitivism and advocates protecting the environment.

After its introduction in Vinge's stories, the singularity has also become a common ground in any element of science fiction.

The technology

2008-02-04T13:27:00.000+07:00

The technology is a broad concept that deals with the use and knowledge of tools and crafts, and how it affects the ability to control and adapt to the environment. In human society, it is a consequence of science and engineering, although several technological advances prior to these two notions. The technology is a term with origins in the Greek "Technologia", "τεχνολογία" - "techne", "τέχνη" ( "boat") and "Logia", "λογία" ( "say"). [1] However , A strict definition is difficult, "technology" may refer to physical objects of use to humanity, such as machinery, equipment or utensils, but may also include broader themes, including systems, organisational methods and techniques. The term can be applied in general or in specific areas: for example "construction technology", "medical technology", or "state-of-the-art technology." Others species have also been observed to have created and used technology, including non-human primates, dolphins and crows.

People using the technology began with the transformation of natural resources in simple tools. The prehistoric discovery of the ability to control the fire has increased food sources and the invention of the wheel has helped the man to move and control their environment. Recent technological developments, including the printing press, telephone and the Internet have reduced the physical barriers to communication and allowed humans to interact on a global scale. However, any technology has been used for peaceful purposes, the development of weapons of increasingly destructive power has progressed through history, clubs nuclear weapons.

Technology has affected the society and its environment in a number of ways. In many societies, technology has helped develop more advanced economies (including today's global economy) and led to the development of a leisure class. Many technological processes produce undesirable byproducts, known as pollution and depletion of natural resources, to the detriment of the Earth and its environment. Various implementations of the technology influence a society's values and new technologies often raises new ethical questions. These include the rise of the notion of efficiency in terms of human productivity, a term only applies to the original machines, and the challenge of traditional norms.

Debates arose philosophical about the present and future utilization of technology in society, with disagreements over whether technology improves the human condition or worse. Neo-Luddism, anarcho-primitivism, and similar movements criticize the omnipresence of technology in the modern world, arguing that it harms the environment and alienates people; tenants ideologies such as transhumanism and techno-progressivism Following view of technological progress as beneficial to society and the human condition. Indeed, until recently, it was believed that the development of technology has been limited only to human beings, but recent scientific studies indicate that other primates and some dolphin communities have developed simple tools and learned to convey their knowledge to other generations.

As the paradigm "Gestalt of a world vision"

2008-02-01T13:44:00.000+07:00

Another point of view the notion of what is a paradigm, a paradigm is Gestalt (organized) of the three main branches of philosophy which is a "Weltanschauung" (German for "Du")

Use the concept of paradigm in the understanding of Kuhn and others, are most often vague and ambiguous analogies - ignotum per ignotius (explained the unknown through most unknown), or by obscurum obscurius (explained lack of clarity through the more blurred) - At other concepts as the model.

Kuhn defines a paradigm as "a constellation of beliefs, values and techniques, and so forth, shared by members of a given community" (Kuhn). This definition appears Kuhn, 1969 postscript to his first book, because originally the term paradigm was not clearly defined. In addition to this definition Kuhn mentioned another way of using it had: a paradigm also "identifies a kind of element in this constellation, concrete puzzle solutions, used as models or examples, can replace explicit rules as a basis for the solution of other puzzles of science normal "[Ibid.] The term remains unclear because of different uses it is given.

Paradigms could be described as structural. Paradigms operate at different levels, macro, meso and micro levels of the paradigm of the structure. Levels address the fundamental structure of paradigms, rather than his chronological history-categorization or etymological use, as used by most disciplines. Levels of paradigms are always present and is not confined to those categories. They contribute to an understanding of how a paradigm.

At the macro level, a knowledge of basic assumption to the question: "what can be heard" is necessary. The question is: "Can it really be assumed that the essences of things ideal could be known at all, as in Plato and Aristotle use of the theory of ideas? Essentialistic addition to the approaches of these two philosophers, Is it not possible that "things themselves as they are revealed," analysed in Heidegger basic ontology? assumption that we are doing to address these issues predispose the perception that determines how we ask the question on how we come to knowledge.

In the meso level, the question is how the macro-economic influences on the forms and theory of knowledge. "Is that bounded by deductive knowledge of human perception to man or man is open to an induction-comprehensive understanding of the world?". If man is open to the inductive knowledge, what is its origin? The assumption on the macro level is the basis of this assumption. All efforts philosophical since the pre-socratics are essentialistic. An ontological approach seeks to evade the essences of things, requiring themselves to reveal things as they are.

At the microeconomic level, therefore, the perception of the two previous levels, answering the questions of what is in the world and how the world is understood, is used in a practical way of doing things. Is the practice based on several "laws of Conduct (ethics), or is it a fundamental and constant encounter with the open world as a way different from the perception? Such a perception is a different "emotional awareness." Past and current understanding of the perception is limited to essentialistic categories of limitation. "Awareness emotional" is by nature open and unlimited, inductive and not limited to "the perception sense."

Thus, a paradigm is a view of reality which is a "Gestalt" arising from the three branches of philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology and ethics (see Encyclopaedia Britannica: branches of philosophy):

(1) a metaphysical assumption of what might be known (refer to the pre-Socratics Parmenides and Heraclitus). It forms the basis for:

(2) an epistemological the acquisition of knowledge. This is the line essentialistic essentialism of the thought of Plato, Aristotle and Popper ontological against the line of thought (ontology) opened by the "uncertainty principle" of Heisenberg theories of quantum Heidegger "fundamentals Ontology." This is the basis for:

(3) in an ethical practice of life.

It is obvious that the three branches of philosophy to describe the structure of a paradigm. None of the branches of metaphysics, epistemology and ethics can be left aside for the understanding of paradigms. Together, they describe a "Gestalt", resembles a spiral (and not a simple circular) movement, forming the understanding hermeneutics.

The result is that hermeneutics can not be reduced to an interpretation of something in the context of the text itself in a mere "hermeneutical circle," and it is a development round which aims to:

(a) "Wahrnehmung" as an "emotional awareness", which is more than just perception sense. The method to emotional awareness east by the "ontological understanding." It is the principles which underlie a paradigm , Is designed as the Heraclitean "flows" (Heraclitus) or Parmenidean "a" (Parmenides). This principle is seen as the relationship between limited to unlimited. Meta-ethics "principles" as the rule of Gold ethics "Do to others as you would like to do for you" are trained here.

(b) "verstehen" that the analysis of "being" to achieve understanding of 'me'. Here, construction, or future, a theory of knowledge is produced, determined by the assumptions in my metaphysical "conviction" of the nature of reality in (a). These assumptions necessarily a trend mainly deductive or inductive essentially the theory of knowledge acquisition, which is reflected in my epistemology. Messo-ethical "standards", as the sanctity of human life and freedom, are made at this level.

(c) "ethos" is an attempt to shape the world in which we live, increasingly an "attitude" or participation in a mutually structured reality. All those who choose to participate in this reality, do so by "take responsibility for actions" in a social environment. More specifically micro-ethics "codes of conduct" as monogamy and what we consider to be "true and good behaviour ", was systematized in our" dogma "at this level.

(d) "Praxis" is "good" thing. This is the result of systematic behavior (a), (b) and (c) in a Gestalt, where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. This behaviour is still the basis for "Wahrnemung", repeating the cycle on a new level. The most important thing is to understand that this cycle does not begin now to the previous starting position. It is a "new consciousness" of the practice because of previous stages in the cycle. The next round of "Wahrnemung" is high compared to the emotional level of awareness to a better understanding. This is the basis for a new understanding of development. The development is much more than a "mechanistic", by definition, all processes mechanistic function and are "essentially" closed systems. The development is, by definition, an inductive load element. Another important point is that there is no beginning or end in the cycle, each step is on a high level of its previous position. Contrast to this, a circle has a beginning and an end, which has effectively no development is merely a reaffirmation of what was previously in a stagnant fundamentalism.

Thus, a paradigm can only be understood in the context of a hermeneutics cycle structure paradigms. It replaces the simple interpretation or simply be understood. It implies that the paradigms of development are by nature, moving in a hermeneutic cycle instead of a recurring mechanical environments. Describing a paradigm as an epoch, epic, model, Weltanschauung, or any other term is barely more than simply rename the concept of a paradigm to another concept known, might be a tautology terms of trade.

The ethics of technology

2008-01-04T13:54:00.000+07:00

The ethics of technology is a subfield of ethics to address ethical issues specific to the technology age. Some works of the philosopher Hans Jonas are devoted to the ethics of technology. Technology itself is unable to own moral or ethical qualities, since the "technology" is simply tools. Thus, "the ethics of technology" refers instead of two subdivisions.

* The ethics involved in the development of new technologies - whether forever, ever, or the context of good or bad to invent and implement a technological innovation.
* The ethical issues that are exacerbated by the way technology expands or restricts the power of individuals - how standard ethical questions are modified by the new powers.

In the first case, the ethics of things like information security and computer viruses wondered if the very act of innovation is an ethic of good or bad act. Similarly, a scientific fact have a moral obligation to produce or fail to produce a nuclear weapon? What are the ethical issues surrounding the production of technologies that waste or conservation of energy and resources? What are the ethical issues surrounding the production of new manufacturing processes that may hamper employment, or could inflict suffering in the Third World?

In the latter case, the ethics of technology breaks down quickly in the ethics of the various efforts of man as modified by new technologies. For example, bioethics is now widely consumed with questions that have been exacerbated by the new life preservation technologies, new cloning technology, and new technologies for implantation. In law, the right of privacy is always tempered by the emergence of new forms of surveillance and anonymity. The former ethical issues of privacy and freedom of expression are given a new shape and urgency in an era of the Internet. These RFID tracking devices, biometric analysis and identification, genetic screening, to take all the old ethical questions and amplify their import.

History of Technology

2008-01-04T13:46:00.000+07:00

Considered under the Greek word techne (art, crafts or knowledge), philosophy of technology goes to the very roots of Western philosophy. In his Republic, Plato sees techne as a basis for philosophers' good standing of the city. In the Nicomachean Ethics (Book 6), techne Aristotle described as one of four ways that we can know about the world. The Stoics argued that virtue is a kind of techne on the basis of a good understanding of the universe.

[change] 20th century development

Considering that the philosophers of the 19th century such as Karl Marx was philosophically interested in tools and techniques, the most eminent philosophers of the 20th century sent directly to modern technology were John Dewey and Martin Heidegger. Both saw technology as essential to modern life, but (to talk about) Dewey was optimistic about the role of technology, Heidegger pessimistic (though Heidegger can be regarded as critical, but open to technology, see Hubert Dreyfus and Technology). Dewey working on technology has been dispersed throughout his body, while Heidegger most of the work on technology May be found in the question concerning technology.

In the years 1960, Marshall McLuhan has become a leading radical voice in the field, with works like the best-seller The medium is the message, and The Gutenberg Galaxy and understanding of the media: the extensions of the man.

The appropriate technology

2008-01-04T13:30:00.000+07:00

The appropriate technology (AT) is a technology that is designed with special attention to environmental, ethical, cultural, social and economic aspects of the community, it is intended. With these objectives in mind, AT generally requires fewer resources, is easier to maintain a lower cost and less environmental impact.

Proponents use the term to describe the technologies they consider to be suitable for use in developing countries or sub-rural areas of industrialized countries, who feel can not operate and maintain high technology. Appropriate Technology generally prefers to labor-intensive solutions to more capital-intensive, although labour-saving devices are also used where it does not mean high capital costs or maintenance.

In practice it is often something that could be described as easier by using the level of technology that can effectively achieve the objective in a particular place. However, the terminology is not very precise.

EF Schumacher claims that these technologies, described in the book Small is Beautiful [1] seeks to promote values such as health, beauty and permanence, in that order.

What exactly constitutes appropriate technology in a given case is a matter of debate, but generally, the term is used by theorists to question high technology or what they see as excessive mechanization, displacement, resource depletion and increasing pollution associated with industrialization. The term has often but not always, been applied to the situation of developing countries or sub-rural areas of industrialized countries.

It could be argued that "appropriate technology" for a technologically advanced society May means a more expensive, requiring a complex technology experts and maintenance high energy inputs. However, this is not the usual sense .

Scientific paradigm

2008-01-01T13:36:00.000+07:00

The main articles: paradigm shift, sociology of knowledge, Systemics, Commensurability (philosophy of science), and Confirmation holism

Historian of science Thomas Kuhn gave the word its contemporary meaning when he adopted it to describe all practices that define a scientific discipline during a period of time. Kuhn himself came to prefer the terms model and normal science, which are more accurate philosophical sense. However, in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Kuhn defines a scientific paradigm:

1. What must be observed and examined
2. The type of questions that are supposed to be asked and answers sounded
a report thereon
3. How these issues should be structured
4. How the results of scientific research should be interpreted

Otherwise, the Oxford English Dictionary defines a paradigm as "a model or a model, a model." Thus, an additional component of Kuhn, the definition of paradigm is:

* How is an experiment to be carried out, and what equipment is available to conduct the experiment.

Thus, in normal science, the paradigm is all copies of experiences that are likely to be copied or imitated. The dominant paradigm is often a more specific way of viewing reality, or limitations programmes acceptable for future research, that much more general of the scientific method.

An example of a paradigm is the currently accepted standard model of physics. The scientific method would scientific research Orthodox many phenomena that might contradict or refute the standard model, but subsidies would be more difficult to obtain for such experiments, in proportion to the amount of departure from accepted standard model theory would experience d 'test. For example, an experiment to test the mass of neutrinos or decomposition of the proton (small departures from the model) would be more likely to receive money that experiments in search of the violation of conservation of momentum, or how to reverse engineer time travel.

An important aspect of paradigms Kuhn, is that paradigms are immeasurable, which means that two paradigms can not be compared to each other. A new paradigm that replaces an old paradigm is not necessarily better, because the criteria for judgement depend on the paradigm.

A more disparaging term groupthink, and the term of mind, have a very similar that apply to small and larger-scale examples of disciplined thought. Michel Foucault used the words episteme and discourse, Mathesis taxinomia and for aspects of a "paradigm" of Kuhn in the original sense.

Commune simple analogy: A simplified version of paradigm for analogy is a habit or reasoning, the box in the commonly used phrase "Thinking Outside the Box." Thinking inside the box is similar to normal science. The box includes the thought of science normal and, hence, the box is similar to the paradigm. "Leaving the beaten path 'is what Kuhn called revolutionary science. Revolutionary of science is generally failed, and only rarely leads to new paradigms. When they are they lead to large-scale changes in the scientific world.

Paradigm Technolgy

2008-01-01T13:35:00.000+07:00

Since the late 1960's, the word paradigm (API: / ə ˈ da pær ɪ m /) referred to the current thinking in any scientific discipline or other context epistemological. Initially, the word is specific to grammar: the 1900 Merriam-Webster dictionary defines his technique in the context of grammar or, in rhetoric, as a term of illustration for a fable or parable. In linguistics, Ferdinand de Saussure paradigm used to describe a set of elements of similarities. The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines it as "a philosophical and theoretical framework of a scientific school or discipline within which the theories, laws and generalizations and experiences in support of them are made ; Widely: philosophical or theoretical framework of any nature whatsoever