<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CE4BRXYyeyp7ImA9WxBUGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643</id><updated>2010-03-07T09:42:34.893-05:00</updated><title>Technology, Media, and Telecom (TMT) Analyst</title><subtitle type="html">Analysis and Commentary on Technology, Media, and Telecommunication stocks.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>300</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst" /><feedburner:info uri="technologymediaandtelecomtmtanalyst" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE4BRXc7eCp7ImA9WxBUGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-1210746010113566713</id><published>2010-03-07T09:33:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-07T09:42:34.900-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-07T09:42:34.900-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="orbitz" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="priceline" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="expedia" /><title>Memo to Karl Icahn: Talk to Expedia Management</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/1210746010113566713/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/03/memo-to-karl-icahn-talk-to-expedia.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/1210746010113566713?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/1210746010113566713?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/d6_rqk34gv8/memo-to-karl-icahn-talk-to-expedia.html" title="Memo to Karl Icahn: Talk to Expedia Management" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/S5O4n-34qBI/AAAAAAAAAOw/8CgV2Zi2DqI/s72-c/EXPE++valuation.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">This is the tale of two online travel companies – company A and company B.   

Company A raked in $21.8 billion of gross travel bookings in 2009 and is by far the largest online travel company. It generated $3 billion in fees, or revenues, from those bookings. Those fees are expected to grow 17% in 2010, according to consensus. EBITDA is expected to reach nearly $950 million in 2010, up 12% YoY. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4G5DNEZgnXCZkzuUTvR74MIYV3Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4G5DNEZgnXCZkzuUTvR74MIYV3Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4G5DNEZgnXCZkzuUTvR74MIYV3Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4G5DNEZgnXCZkzuUTvR74MIYV3Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/d6_rqk34gv8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/03/memo-to-karl-icahn-talk-to-expedia.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cGQXo-fip7ImA9WxBUFUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-2806392782637091323</id><published>2010-03-02T12:30:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-02T12:30:20.456-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-02T12:30:20.456-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AOL" /><title>AOL: 1Q10 Domestic Display Advertising Down YoY</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/2806392782637091323/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/03/aol-1q10-domestic-display-advertising.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/2806392782637091323?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/2806392782637091323?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/5CS8NeM20gI/aol-1q10-domestic-display-advertising.html" title="AOL: 1Q10 Domestic Display Advertising Down YoY" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">In the 10K filing, AOL stated that its 1Q2010 domestic display advertising will be down year-over-year compared to the 1% growth in 4Q09 and the flat guidance for 1Q2010 provided recently on the 4Q09 earnings conference call. AOL cites its advertising sales organization restructuring which resulted in the reassignment of a majority of advertising accounts, significantly lower monetization of AOL 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1_wYJL3chl0ee3z9mQXZDjZsjSo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1_wYJL3chl0ee3z9mQXZDjZsjSo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1_wYJL3chl0ee3z9mQXZDjZsjSo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1_wYJL3chl0ee3z9mQXZDjZsjSo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/5CS8NeM20gI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/03/aol-1q10-domestic-display-advertising.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0UDRHs8cSp7ImA9WxBUFEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-879516198380515504</id><published>2010-03-01T22:07:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-01T22:07:55.579-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-01T22:07:55.579-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Disney" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Cablevision" /><title>Disney Threatens to Pull ABC from Cablevision</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/879516198380515504/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/03/disney-threatens-to-pull-abc-from.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/879516198380515504?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/879516198380515504?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/gwQnL3JCVFI/disney-threatens-to-pull-abc-from.html" title="Disney Threatens to Pull ABC from Cablevision" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Disney is stating in commercials that it wants Cablevision to pay monthly fees to bean WABC to New York Cablevision households. Cablevision is stating that Disney wants $40 million in fees. TMTAnalyst


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K0LeFoOTOlQRW0rs0BcbzpGClj0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K0LeFoOTOlQRW0rs0BcbzpGClj0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K0LeFoOTOlQRW0rs0BcbzpGClj0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K0LeFoOTOlQRW0rs0BcbzpGClj0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/gwQnL3JCVFI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/03/disney-threatens-to-pull-abc-from.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0ACQno_fyp7ImA9WxBUEk0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-9047498840998593873</id><published>2010-02-26T12:34:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T12:36:03.447-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-26T12:36:03.447-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Akamai" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><title>Google Akamai Runor Resurfaces</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/9047498840998593873/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/google-akamai-runor-resurfaces.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/9047498840998593873?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/9047498840998593873?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/zx15l0YT9T0/google-akamai-runor-resurfaces.html" title="Google Akamai Runor Resurfaces" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Shares of Akamai (AKAM) are moving higher on renewed speculation that Google may purchase the company. Those rumors surfaced last October, however several analysts stated that the rumors were not credible. See this article from Gigaom which sheds light on the rumor. TMTAnalyst
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wa_k-EPfBe-t3tT2fW8jZgM_eTM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wa_k-EPfBe-t3tT2fW8jZgM_eTM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wa_k-EPfBe-t3tT2fW8jZgM_eTM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wa_k-EPfBe-t3tT2fW8jZgM_eTM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/zx15l0YT9T0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/google-akamai-runor-resurfaces.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkYESX45eip7ImA9WxBUEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-2652448520947702692</id><published>2010-02-24T21:08:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-24T21:15:08.022-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-24T21:15:08.022-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Cisco" /><title>Cisco Systems developing ultra-high-speed internet access system</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/2652448520947702692/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/cisco-systems-developing-ultra-high.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/2652448520947702692?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/2652448520947702692?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/9ngq-7jYHRQ/cisco-systems-developing-ultra-high.html" title="Cisco Systems developing ultra-high-speed internet access system" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">People close to the company say it is working with a number of US service providers, who are not named. But the article mentions Cisco customers AT&amp;amp;T (T) and Comcast (CMCSA), and says Cisco is "explicitly allying with the telecom giants" and hoping to benefit from their discomfort with Google (GOOG). Recall Google announced its plans for an experimental 1 gigabit per second fiber network on 10-
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/o4uQv1bJrLQFwE0tDSwnnh3AgeI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/o4uQv1bJrLQFwE0tDSwnnh3AgeI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/o4uQv1bJrLQFwE0tDSwnnh3AgeI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/o4uQv1bJrLQFwE0tDSwnnh3AgeI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/9ngq-7jYHRQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/cisco-systems-developing-ultra-high.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkYDSHo_fCp7ImA9WxBUEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-7652662457296663644</id><published>2010-02-24T21:06:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-24T21:16:19.444-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-24T21:16:19.444-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Samsung" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nokia" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="LG" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sony" /><title>Gartner: 4Q09 Mobile Phones Sales up 8% &amp; Smart Phone Sales up 41%</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/7652662457296663644/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/gartner-4q09-mobile-phones-sales-up-8.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7652662457296663644?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7652662457296663644?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/kPsxKDrOkVY/gartner-4q09-mobile-phones-sales-up-8.html" title="Gartner: 4Q09 Mobile Phones Sales up 8% &amp; Smart Phone Sales up 41%" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Nokia (NOK1V.FH) 2009 global market share was 36.4% vs year ago 38.6% 
Sony ericsson 2009 global market share was 4.5% vs year ago 7.6% 
Motorola (MOT) 2009 global market share was 4.8% year ago vs 8.7% LG (066570.KS) 2009 LG global market share was 10.1% vs year ago 8.4% 
Samsung (005930.KS) 2009 global market share was 19.5% vs year ago 16.3%
Source: Dow Jones, TMTAnalyst
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3aBYDOP3DoswqOh-hnHZYKCk-hc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3aBYDOP3DoswqOh-hnHZYKCk-hc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3aBYDOP3DoswqOh-hnHZYKCk-hc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3aBYDOP3DoswqOh-hnHZYKCk-hc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/kPsxKDrOkVY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/gartner-4q09-mobile-phones-sales-up-8.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkUFSHszeyp7ImA9WxBUEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-3166935771981576778</id><published>2010-02-24T21:03:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-24T21:16:59.583-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-24T21:16:59.583-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><title>Google denies report it cancelled China phone event</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/3166935771981576778/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/google-denies-report-it-cancelled-china.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/3166935771981576778?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/3166935771981576778?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/mgc_wXg8Q8A/google-denies-report-it-cancelled-china.html" title="Google denies report it cancelled China phone event" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Citing company spokeswoman Hohne, the company denies a Reuters report that it cancelled an event in Beijing. Reuters reported that the company had dropped the China leg of a regional event to show software developers its Nexus One. Citing a source close to the company, the report said Google will introduce the phone to software developers in Hong Kong and Taiwan next week, but will not stage a 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Sq9mIVI0O1Y9NcjXDZPqOQoIRgo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Sq9mIVI0O1Y9NcjXDZPqOQoIRgo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Sq9mIVI0O1Y9NcjXDZPqOQoIRgo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Sq9mIVI0O1Y9NcjXDZPqOQoIRgo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/mgc_wXg8Q8A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/google-denies-report-it-cancelled-china.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkUCSXg9eyp7ImA9WxBUEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-989692404609335776</id><published>2010-02-24T09:47:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-24T21:17:48.663-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-24T21:17:48.663-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Apple" /><title>Apple Estimates Raised Above Consensus at Bernstein</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/989692404609335776/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/apple-estimates-raised-above-consensus.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/989692404609335776?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/989692404609335776?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/9WO7a1DZuRw/apple-estimates-raised-above-consensus.html" title="Apple Estimates Raised Above Consensus at Bernstein" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">The firm sees continued upward pressure on margins from the company's mix shift to iPhone and notes the Street is modeling a $100+ drop in average prices for the iPhone over the next two years with a 700bp deterioration margins which they see as aggressive. F10 EPS is raised to $11.99 from $11.67 vs. Reuters $11.76 with f11 raised to $13.73 from $12.72 vs. Reuters $13.43. Target remains $250 with
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wBC4JK4-snl74kgtnrATEljol3s/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wBC4JK4-snl74kgtnrATEljol3s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wBC4JK4-snl74kgtnrATEljol3s/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wBC4JK4-snl74kgtnrATEljol3s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/9WO7a1DZuRw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/apple-estimates-raised-above-consensus.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkAGRngyfyp7ImA9WxBVFUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-7546739772644792709</id><published>2010-02-15T14:49:00.009-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-18T23:45:27.697-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-18T23:45:27.697-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Theatre" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Disney" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Time Warner" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="News Corp" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Viacom" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><title>A Closer Look at the Windowing Debate Reignited by Disney</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/7546739772644792709/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/closer-look-at-windowing-debate.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7546739772644792709?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7546739772644792709?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/raeM6lVjeak/closer-look-at-windowing-debate.html" title="A Closer Look at the Windowing Debate Reignited by Disney" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/S3mn5B2HnAI/AAAAAAAAAOg/ZNZofTKRJvI/s72-c/DVD+sales.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">In the traditional release window model movies are first released in the movie theatres and  about four months later on DVD, and about 45 days later on VOD, and then about 18 months later on pay TV. In about two to three years after the movie’s release they are shown on free and ad-supported TV. And might I dare to add a last option of ad supported Internet sites like Hulu a few years after 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q4EB5H33hl_uHtm0m2HXasD9QU4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q4EB5H33hl_uHtm0m2HXasD9QU4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q4EB5H33hl_uHtm0m2HXasD9QU4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q4EB5H33hl_uHtm0m2HXasD9QU4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/raeM6lVjeak" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/closer-look-at-windowing-debate.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0QGRXgyfip7ImA9WxBVEEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-3783055222883482020</id><published>2010-02-08T19:12:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-13T10:35:24.696-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-13T10:35:24.696-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sprint" /><title>Sprint 4Q09 Preview</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/3783055222883482020/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/sprint-4q09-preview.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/3783055222883482020?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/3783055222883482020?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/2MKk5AG99SQ/sprint-4q09-preview.html" title="Sprint 4Q09 Preview" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Sprint is scheduled to report 4Q09 results on Wednesday Feb. 10th prior to the market open. Conference call is at 8:0am. 

Consensus is calling for revenues of $8 billion, Adj. EBITDA of $1.41bn, 17.6% margin, and GAAP EPS of ($0.19). For the shares to rally, revenues should top $8.30billion, Adj. EBITDA should exceed $1.5 billion, and GAAP EPS should come in above ($0.12). 

On the wireless side
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XtJCizECtmdg3i6uaOSMwMbvVl0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XtJCizECtmdg3i6uaOSMwMbvVl0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XtJCizECtmdg3i6uaOSMwMbvVl0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XtJCizECtmdg3i6uaOSMwMbvVl0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/2MKk5AG99SQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/02/sprint-4q09-preview.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8NQn4-eip7ImA9WxBQGUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-1300016475221447304</id><published>2010-01-20T07:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-20T07:34:53.052-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-20T07:34:53.052-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Newspapers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Advertising" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Radio" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><title>Advertising Trends Looks Favorable in 2010, according to Magna</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/1300016475221447304/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/01/advertising-trends-looks-favorable-in_20.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/1300016475221447304?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/1300016475221447304?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/2tyUEizVlj0/advertising-trends-looks-favorable-in_20.html" title="Advertising Trends Looks Favorable in 2010, according to Magna" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Magna released its U.S. advertising forecasts for 2010 through 2015. In it the research firm forecasts U.S. advertising, ex-political, to remain flat in 2010 and then grow by nearly 2% in 2011. This follows a 14.6% advertising decline in 2009.  

See my previous write-up on stocks to buy in a cyclical advertising recovery.

Not surprisingly, paid search is projected to grow the fastest in 2010, 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v1J2bFvS2yI0kayzibuss0_JGn4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v1J2bFvS2yI0kayzibuss0_JGn4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v1J2bFvS2yI0kayzibuss0_JGn4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/v1J2bFvS2yI0kayzibuss0_JGn4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/2tyUEizVlj0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/01/advertising-trends-looks-favorable-in_20.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0EBRHs4cCp7ImA9WxBRFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-463317973443028664</id><published>2010-01-03T13:59:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-03T14:07:35.538-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-03T14:07:35.538-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Apple" /><title>Apple  - Our Top Tech Pick for 2010</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/463317973443028664/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/01/apple-our-top-tech-pick-for-2010.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/463317973443028664?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/463317973443028664?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/7OYg9CGzyBM/apple-our-top-tech-pick-for-2010.html" title="Apple  - Our Top Tech Pick for 2010" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><content type="html">Apple (APPL) is likely to have a strong 2010 driven by the forthcoming iTablet, expansion of the iPhone platform through Verizon, firmer iPhone sales in Europe and China, strong Mac unit sales, and better than expected iPod sales, which although declining, should be boosted by the Nano. In addition, Apple is likely to split the stock this year. 

According to the Financial Times, Apple is 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Qyb2MBQQcU5GR9xpBKP94Cbq1bQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Qyb2MBQQcU5GR9xpBKP94Cbq1bQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Qyb2MBQQcU5GR9xpBKP94Cbq1bQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Qyb2MBQQcU5GR9xpBKP94Cbq1bQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/7OYg9CGzyBM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2010/01/apple-our-top-tech-pick-for-2010.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkANSXs-eSp7ImA9WxBRE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-8000240499878385471</id><published>2009-12-31T20:35:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-31T20:53:18.551-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-31T20:53:18.551-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Amazon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Apple" /><title>Google, Apple, Amazon 2009 Jockey Race – Amazon Wins!</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/8000240499878385471/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/google-apple-amazon-2009-jockey-race.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/8000240499878385471?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/8000240499878385471?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/0VS7yhKAakQ/google-apple-amazon-2009-jockey-race.html" title="Google, Apple, Amazon 2009 Jockey Race – Amazon Wins!" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/Sz1VMKY_oeI/AAAAAAAAAOI/RHwriRQzE_s/s72-c/Jockey.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">
In a three way jockey race for share price appreciation in 2009, Amazon handily beat Google and Apple posting a return of 166% vs 148% for Apple and 102% for Google. 

All three were neck and neck through mid February until Amazon started shooting past Google and Apple but that lead only lasted through May when Apple caught up. 

Apple eventually overtakes Amazon in mid-July and continued to 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/37vm08uneosX0OVvqGPEzAnco-Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/37vm08uneosX0OVvqGPEzAnco-Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/37vm08uneosX0OVvqGPEzAnco-Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/37vm08uneosX0OVvqGPEzAnco-Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/0VS7yhKAakQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/google-apple-amazon-2009-jockey-race.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkAAQXc5eyp7ImA9WxBSE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-5644955168558658143</id><published>2009-12-20T20:20:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-20T20:25:40.923-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-20T20:25:40.923-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><title>Interesting Data Point on Google</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/5644955168558658143/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/interesting-data-point-on-google.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/5644955168558658143?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/5644955168558658143?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/zp42rMOcqGY/interesting-data-point-on-google.html" title="Interesting Data Point on Google" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">By Shawn AndersonWe were wondering why our Google ads for TMT Advisors were not showing up in several Google searches so we logged into our AdWords account to get a handle on the issue. The account was set up in the fourth quarter of 2008 when all was doom and gloom for anything finance related. Max first page CPC bids for each keyword were set at $0.25 and all keywords were finance/valuation 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wk0G0R3mZw35t0LdDvOjC_d_C4w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wk0G0R3mZw35t0LdDvOjC_d_C4w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wk0G0R3mZw35t0LdDvOjC_d_C4w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Wk0G0R3mZw35t0LdDvOjC_d_C4w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/zp42rMOcqGY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/interesting-data-point-on-google.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUEDSXo9fyp7ImA9WxBSE0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-6304670754168313168</id><published>2009-12-20T16:57:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-20T17:21:18.467-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-20T17:21:18.467-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ATandT" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Verizon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Apple" /><title>Verizon Claims Readiness for iPhone</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/6304670754168313168/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/verizon-claims-readiness-for-iphone.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/6304670754168313168?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/6304670754168313168?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/kTlFbUIP47A/verizon-claims-readiness-for-iphone.html" title="Verizon Claims Readiness for iPhone" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Verizon's Chief Technology Officer Anthony Melone stated in a Business Week interview that Verizon is capable of handling the extra traffic generated by the iPhone."We have put things in place already", "we are prepared to support that traffic"This lends support to my thinking that Verizon will get the iPhone when AT&amp;amp;T's exclusivity ends in "September 2009", although several people are doubting 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7wXClX7yJ0akkN3ZUws2QXrd1lU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7wXClX7yJ0akkN3ZUws2QXrd1lU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7wXClX7yJ0akkN3ZUws2QXrd1lU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7wXClX7yJ0akkN3ZUws2QXrd1lU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/kTlFbUIP47A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/verizon-claims-readiness-for-iphone.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUYBSXY-fip7ImA9WxBSE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-8391952311752118956</id><published>2009-12-20T11:37:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-20T11:39:18.856-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-20T11:39:18.856-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Valuation" /><title>Telecom Valuations</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/8391952311752118956/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/telecom-valuations.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/8391952311752118956?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/8391952311752118956?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/auirJm81YM0/telecom-valuations.html" title="Telecom Valuations" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/Sy5THe_ItkI/AAAAAAAAANo/fKEa7sdUHh4/s72-c/Telecom+Val.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Telecom Company Valuations 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KpEnH0T3Gj5_-BDT0PthoW9UXJY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KpEnH0T3Gj5_-BDT0PthoW9UXJY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KpEnH0T3Gj5_-BDT0PthoW9UXJY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KpEnH0T3Gj5_-BDT0PthoW9UXJY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/auirJm81YM0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/telecom-valuations.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUMRnw-eyp7ImA9WxBSE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-7321126672685255959</id><published>2009-12-20T11:35:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-20T11:41:27.253-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-20T11:41:27.253-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Valuation" /><title>Media Valuations</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/7321126672685255959/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/media-valuations.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7321126672685255959?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7321126672685255959?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/OUpK9cY47u4/media-valuations.html" title="Media Valuations" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/Sy5SxdmjsaI/AAAAAAAAANg/IpCUzJg4TZU/s72-c/Media+Val.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Media Company Valuations. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qgFjaw_2rK2fcmnMApSKxIoiDzo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qgFjaw_2rK2fcmnMApSKxIoiDzo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qgFjaw_2rK2fcmnMApSKxIoiDzo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qgFjaw_2rK2fcmnMApSKxIoiDzo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/OUpK9cY47u4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/media-valuations.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE4ERHg_eyp7ImA9WxBSE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-7257401652491307444</id><published>2009-12-20T11:32:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-20T11:35:05.643-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-20T11:35:05.643-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Valuation" /><title>Internet Valuations</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/7257401652491307444/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/internet-valuations.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7257401652491307444?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7257401652491307444?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/oqCD0AjEzz4/internet-valuations.html" title="Internet Valuations" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/Sy5R5JytFtI/AAAAAAAAANY/RJ7ojFiGo6I/s72-c/Internet+Val.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Internet Equity Valuations. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KXzdK4qu2sbuG2NGedasG8GpYTw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KXzdK4qu2sbuG2NGedasG8GpYTw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KXzdK4qu2sbuG2NGedasG8GpYTw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KXzdK4qu2sbuG2NGedasG8GpYTw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/oqCD0AjEzz4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/internet-valuations.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEAGSH4-eCp7ImA9WxBSE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-1153059214724626980</id><published>2009-12-20T11:25:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-20T11:32:09.050-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-20T11:32:09.050-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Valuation" /><title>Tech Valuations</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/1153059214724626980/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/tech-valuations.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/1153059214724626980?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/1153059214724626980?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/czY_GnXMVds/tech-valuations.html" title="Tech Valuations" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/Sy5RZmCWdiI/AAAAAAAAANQ/dpKJYt8loZY/s72-c/Tech+Val.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Latest Technology Equity Valuations 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYafRJXFRUGVzggfwexeYegeP_8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYafRJXFRUGVzggfwexeYegeP_8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYafRJXFRUGVzggfwexeYegeP_8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYafRJXFRUGVzggfwexeYegeP_8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/czY_GnXMVds" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/tech-valuations.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0UGRXw_eip7ImA9WxBTGU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-8625559868455251359</id><published>2009-12-15T22:19:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-15T22:47:04.242-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-15T22:47:04.242-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Yahoo" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Microsoft" /><title>Google Gains More Search Share; Bing Notched Up; Yahoo Continues to Slide</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/8625559868455251359/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/google-gains-more-search-share-bing.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/8625559868455251359?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/8625559868455251359?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/jAfn4hFkFOE/google-gains-more-search-share-bing.html" title="Google Gains More Search Share; Bing Notched Up; Yahoo Continues to Slide" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">According to data from comScore, Google and Bing gained search share in November 2009, but Yahoo lost share. Google’s domestic search share increased to 65.6% from 65.4% in October and search volume grew 22% YoY, an acceleration from the 17% growth in October. Microsoft’s Bing search engine saw its share improve to 10.3% from 9.9% and its search volume grew 46% YoY, an acceleration from 31% in 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rg7QGRdaCdRuL7jCBybs8-ffd5g/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rg7QGRdaCdRuL7jCBybs8-ffd5g/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rg7QGRdaCdRuL7jCBybs8-ffd5g/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rg7QGRdaCdRuL7jCBybs8-ffd5g/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/jAfn4hFkFOE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/google-gains-more-search-share-bing.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0MMR3oyfyp7ImA9WxBUFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-6166100447093368434</id><published>2009-12-13T20:45:00.008-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-02T06:31:26.497-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-02T06:31:26.497-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="eBay" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Amazon" /><title>Holiday eCommerce Spending up 3% YoY to $20bn</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/6166100447093368434/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/holiday-ecommerce-spending-up-3-yoy-to.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/6166100447093368434?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/6166100447093368434?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/s6GSlDp6-8s/holiday-ecommerce-spending-up-3-yoy-to.html" title="Holiday eCommerce Spending up 3% YoY to $20bn" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/SyWb-5qkMOI/AAAAAAAAANI/4CiG6tnO8Iw/s72-c/comscore.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">comScore reported that online holiday spending reached $20 billion, up 3% YoY. The most recent week saw above average online spending growth of 4 percent versus year ago, as two individual days surpassed $800 million in spending, led by Thursday, Dec. 10, with $852 million.  

Ten Heaviest Online Spending Days on Record
"Since comScore began tracking e-commerce spending in 2001, it has witnessed 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JHdHvIvKu4gumS2RrQjJRmcoebw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JHdHvIvKu4gumS2RrQjJRmcoebw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JHdHvIvKu4gumS2RrQjJRmcoebw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JHdHvIvKu4gumS2RrQjJRmcoebw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/s6GSlDp6-8s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/holiday-ecommerce-spending-up-3-yoy-to.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUYDRng9eyp7ImA9WxBTFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-5838671487016685336</id><published>2009-12-12T10:57:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-12T11:59:37.663-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-12T11:59:37.663-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ATandT" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Verizon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Qualcomm" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Apple" /><title>Verizon/Qualcomm Global Dual Mode iPone in 3Q10</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/5838671487016685336/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/verizonqualcomm-global-dual-mode-ipone.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/5838671487016685336?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/5838671487016685336?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/A5qqzDOV3bk/verizonqualcomm-global-dual-mode-ipone.html" title="Verizon/Qualcomm Global Dual Mode iPone in 3Q10" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Verizon, will indeed, get the iPhone in 2010, according to a source close enough to the table.  The iPhone, scheduled for launch in the third quarter of 2010, is said to be a smaller version of the current iPhone and should be a hybrid global phone by Qualcomm. Several points real and inferred here:1) Verizon, not T-Mobile, gets the iPhone in 20102) It is a smaller version of the current iPhone. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3LwtjHNzC-rNxmXGRxDFfOvr65s/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3LwtjHNzC-rNxmXGRxDFfOvr65s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3LwtjHNzC-rNxmXGRxDFfOvr65s/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3LwtjHNzC-rNxmXGRxDFfOvr65s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/A5qqzDOV3bk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/verizonqualcomm-global-dual-mode-ipone.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYEQHg8eip7ImA9WxBTEkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-4370574860352273343</id><published>2009-12-08T09:35:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-08T09:38:21.672-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-08T09:38:21.672-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Blue Nile" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Liberty Capital" /><title>Liberty Interested in Purchasing Blue Nile</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/4370574860352273343/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/liberty-interested-in-purchasing-blue.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/4370574860352273343?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/4370574860352273343?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/2-rSrZxx_vw/liberty-interested-in-purchasing-blue.html" title="Liberty Interested in Purchasing Blue Nile" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Speaking at the UBS Media Conference this morning, Liberty Media CEO John Maffei said that he is interested in purchasing Blue Nile but thinks the valuation is too expensive.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MP7l6SG1YeXCdiC7LwFe2WfRevI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MP7l6SG1YeXCdiC7LwFe2WfRevI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MP7l6SG1YeXCdiC7LwFe2WfRevI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MP7l6SG1YeXCdiC7LwFe2WfRevI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/2-rSrZxx_vw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/liberty-interested-in-purchasing-blue.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A08FQHoyeCp7ImA9WxBUFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-5811782630884851480</id><published>2009-12-06T13:03:00.012-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-02T06:36:51.490-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-02T06:36:51.490-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Advertising" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media" /><title>Good Times Ahead for Media Companies</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/5811782630884851480/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/good-times-ahead-for-media-companies.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/5811782630884851480?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/5811782630884851480?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/Xg2ljABI3KM/good-times-ahead-for-media-companies.html" title="Good Times Ahead for Media Companies" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0knwHV09Ouc/Sxv2mTr7nzI/AAAAAAAAAM4/oQQCNDRvHC8/s72-c/us+ad+growth+rates.bmp" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">UBS is hosting a media conference this week in which, just about, every publicly traded major media company is presenting. See my write-up Stocks to Buy in a Cyclical Advertising Recovery.

There is a lot for media companies and investors to be gleeful about these days. There was a major transaction in the space that is likely to spark additional mega and smaller mergers, and as the chart below 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QNEKx80G4zthRUaorDz-dHCqkks/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QNEKx80G4zthRUaorDz-dHCqkks/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QNEKx80G4zthRUaorDz-dHCqkks/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QNEKx80G4zthRUaorDz-dHCqkks/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/Xg2ljABI3KM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/good-times-ahead-for-media-companies.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkYEQXw5eSp7ImA9WxBUFU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6209146762802700643.post-7554299446362093444</id><published>2009-12-06T12:54:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-02T06:41:40.221-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-02T06:41:40.221-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ask.com" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Yahoo" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Microsoft" /><title>Bing’s Share Gains Driven by its OEM Relationships</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/feeds/7554299446362093444/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/bings-share-gains-driven-by-its-oem.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7554299446362093444?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6209146762802700643/posts/default/7554299446362093444?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~3/pA4mAmWuoNg/bings-share-gains-driven-by-its-oem.html" title="Bing’s Share Gains Driven by its OEM Relationships" /><author><name>Tech, Media, and Telecom Analyst</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05796015985334508537</uri><email>mediatechanalyst@gmail.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03249202573143134011" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">It appears that Bing’s share gains could be largely due to its OEM distribution relationships with HP, Dell, and Lenovo, rather than users making a conscious decision to shift from Yahoo, Google, and other search engines. Combined, the above three computer manufacturers have more than 50% market share in the U.S. and PC sales have been increasing over the past few months. As PC sales increase, 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jF7Tvv4K8g3tp--CwYBe5yx1ogU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jF7Tvv4K8g3tp--CwYBe5yx1ogU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jF7Tvv4K8g3tp--CwYBe5yx1ogU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jF7Tvv4K8g3tp--CwYBe5yx1ogU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyMediaAndTelecomtmtAnalyst/~4/pA4mAmWuoNg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.mediatechanalyst.com/2009/12/bings-share-gains-driven-by-its-oem.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
