<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>Tecture Articles</title>
    <link>http://www.tecture.net/</link>
    <description>Listing of Tecture's most recent articles</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate><![CDATA[<si:Boundfield name="Date" format="{0:ddd, dd MMM yyyy hh:mm:ss}"/> CST]]></pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate><![CDATA[<si:Boundfield name="Date" format="{0:ddd, dd MMM yyyy hh:mm:ss}"/> CST]]></lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://www.tecture.net/</docs>
    <generator>Site Ingnition 2.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>admin@tecture.net</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>admin@tecture.net</webMaster>
 
     
     <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TectureArticles" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
           <title><![CDATA[ Open Source or Commercial Software ]]></title>
           <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Open+Source+or+Commercial+Software ]]></guid>
           <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TectureArticles/~3/b03LTbS_jsk/Open+Source+or+Commercial+Software</link>
           <description>Any small business developing a website or web-based application faces the vital decision of which technology platform to use. Most business owners are ill-equipped to make that choice, and it's not their fault: Their trusted advisors will often spin them around with wildly different opinions.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TectureArticles/~4/b03LTbS_jsk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <feedburner:origLink>http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Open+Source+or+Commercial+Software</feedburner:origLink></item>
     
     <item>
           <title><![CDATA[ Why Flash is a Poor Choice for Websites ]]></title>
           <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Why+Flash+is+a+Poor+Choice+for+Websites ]]></guid>
           <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TectureArticles/~3/Z3XICmB-ldQ/Why+Flash+is+a+Poor+Choice+for+Websites</link>
           <description>I love Adobe Flash. I love the idea of it. I love that I can get an identical web interface on any platform. I love the power of ActionScript as well.
For many designers, Flash is the logical follow-up to mastering Adobe Illustrator®. Importing a web design from Illustrator into Flash is fairly simple. Better yet, you can bypass HTML challenges such as text that stretches your carefully composed designs.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TectureArticles/~4/Z3XICmB-ldQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <feedburner:origLink>http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Why+Flash+is+a+Poor+Choice+for+Websites</feedburner:origLink></item>
     
     <item>
           <title><![CDATA[ The 10 Secrets of Budget Web Hosts ]]></title>
           <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ http://www.tecture.net/Articles/The+10+Secrets+of+Budget+Web+Hosts ]]></guid>
           <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TectureArticles/~3/vF9i1ssNtlg/The+10+Secrets+of+Budget+Web+Hosts</link>
           <description>I've answered many questions about web and e-mail hosting and begun to notice a pattern: Customers often want to know why our hosting costs more than $99 per year.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TectureArticles/~4/vF9i1ssNtlg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <feedburner:origLink>http://www.tecture.net/Articles/The+10+Secrets+of+Budget+Web+Hosts</feedburner:origLink></item>
     
     <item>
           <title><![CDATA[ Rebuttal: Why Flash is a good choice for websites ]]></title>
           <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Rebuttal+Why+Flash+is+a+good+choice+for+websites ]]></guid>
           <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TectureArticles/~3/jA5leqlkvfc/Rebuttal+Why+Flash+is+a+good+choice+for+websites</link>
           <description>Okay, so you’ve heard from others about the perils of Flash websites.  Search the web for “reasons for Flash", and you will get links upon links of why Flash should&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TectureArticles/~4/jA5leqlkvfc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <feedburner:origLink>http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Rebuttal+Why+Flash+is+a+good+choice+for+websites</feedburner:origLink></item>
     
     <item>
           <title><![CDATA[ Modern Wisdom for Search-Engine Optimization ]]></title>
           <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Modern+Wisdom+for+Search-Engine+Optimization ]]></guid>
           <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TectureArticles/~3/YonJ5UbK_Vk/Modern+Wisdom+for+Search-Engine+Optimization</link>
           <description>It's now a well-known fact: Gone are the days when your business could optimize its allure to search engines once and then coast for months on the benefits. Today's savvy&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TectureArticles/~4/YonJ5UbK_Vk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <feedburner:origLink>http://www.tecture.net/Articles/Modern+Wisdom+for+Search-Engine+Optimization</feedburner:origLink></item>
     
  </channel>
</rss>
