You might like going through this material:

http://zaidhamidexposition.wordpress.com/the-case-against-zaid-hamid/

Under “Refutation of Zaid Hamid’s Pack of Lies”, the 4th point needs your special consideration.

SIR YOU ARE HONEST, PROFESSIONAL , IT IS NOT NORMAL THING IN OUR SOCIETY WE MUST PROUD AND PAY THANKS TO ALLAH BUT REAL PAY OF THANKS IS TO SEE ALL ASPECTS AND DO ON MERIT EACH AND EVERY THING.TODAY ON TV PROGRAMME YOU HAVE ASKED QUESTION THAT WHY WE ARE HEARING CONSPIRECY AGAINST REINSTATED JUDGE CJ CH IFTEHKHAR SAIB.
YES THESE THING WILL BE HAPPENED BECAUSE WE DID WRONG AND IT IS NATURE,ALL RELIGONS AND ISLAMIC RULES THAT NEGATIVE AND WRONG THING COULD NOT GET POSITIVE RESULT.
WHAT WE DID.
1 CH NISSAR CLEARLY SAID IN N.A SESSION THAT CH CJ DID UN JUSTICE WITH THEM.
2 PRESIDENT ZARDARI SAID HE HIS PERSONALLY VICTIM OF CJ’S CURRPTION.
3 OPPOSITION LEADER JAVAID HASHMI CLEARLY SAID THAT CH CJ DID UN JUSTICE WITH HIM.
4.DURILNG ELECTION PEOPLE CLEARLY GAVE VERDICT AGAINST CJ SUPPORTIVE PARTY MUSLIM LEAGUE N AND BECAME 2ND PARTY AND 3 PROVINCES REJECTED HIM DUE TO OATH ON ONE ISSUE.
5. PEOPLE REJECTED THE OPPOSITION CALL AND PARTICIPATED IN ELECTION.
6. on 15 march th RESPECTIVE ALI KURD SAIB WHOLE DAY VISITED TO THE WHOLE BALOUCHISTAN AND SAID THAT IT IS PROVINCE OF AKBAR BUGHATI, KURDD FAIMLY AND CJ IFTHAEKHAR SAIB BUT ONLY 300 PEOPLE CAME WITH HIM.. PEOPLE OF BALOUCHISTAN HAS GIVEN CLEAR DECISION AGAINST THE CJ, IFTHEKHAR CH. DID NOT PARTICAPATED BY THE JAMAT ISLAMI PEOPLE AND ALSO NOT PARTICIPATED BY THE PEOPLE OF BALOUCHISTAN.
3. IN BALOUCHISTAN THERE WAS NO 144 NO ANY RISTRITION FROM ANY CORNER.
3. IN KARACHI THERE WAS NO RESRICTION FOR PARTICIPANT AND EVERY ONE HAV HAS SEEN THAT ONLY 800 PEOPLE CAME AT SOHRAB GOTH.
4. CAMERA IS WITNESS OF THIS WHOLE STORY AND PLEASE MENTION THESES THINGS IF YOU BELIEVE ON JUSTICE AND LOVE TO PAKISTAN
5. IT IS AGAIN PROVED SAME LIKE ELECTION VERDICT IN WHICH PEOPLE DID NOT GIVE VOTE FOR THOSE PARTY (M—N) AND ALSO DID NOT ACCEPTED THE BOYCOT OF ELECTION

(3)
3. MARCH DEMONSTRATION WAS PARTIES CALL WHICH IS NOT VERDICT OF PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN .THESE TYPE DEMONSTRATION EACH AND EVERY PARTY CAN DEMONSTRATED.
BUT WHAT IS GOING ON NOW.
SAME RESULT WHICH WE DID WRONG AND WE GET WRONG IT IS UNDER STOOD. IN NATURE
18. Please don’t destroy your self and do not say words which are not justiceful. Because according to Hadith all words are accumulated and same returns to its speaker.AND where justice will not be observed there severe punishment by the God could be seen. If person ,home or any will do they will face but if judge will do injustice whole nation will bear AZAB.

4. CH CJ IS MEETING WITH POLITICAL PEOPLE LIKE SFDAR ABBASI PPP AND OTHERS IT IS WRONG.
5. .ONE POLITICAL ADVOCATE DAILY DECTATING TO CH CJ.
6. JUSTICE RAMDAY CLEARLY PROMISED THAT HE WILL TAKE RETIREMENT AFTER REINSTATMENT BUT CJ CH IS SAYING TO RAMDAY SAIB THAT HE SHOULD DO AGIANST HIS DECISSION AND NOT TAKE RETIREMENT.
WE ARE NOT ON RIGHT WAY WE SHOULD HAVE STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY BUT WE DID SOME THING FOR FRIENDSHIP WHIH IS WRONG AND RESULT WILL BE WRONG IT IS UNDERSTOOD.

PLEASE PUPLISH MY VIEW IN YOUR ARTICLE AS LETTER WRITTEER IT WILL BE JUSTICE WITH THE PAKISTAN AND PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN.

WE ARE JUST SEEING NOT MENTIONING, OBSERVING ANY THING ON MERIT . SINCE LONG LONG TIME BENZIR PROMISE HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTENED THAT SHE PROMISTED TO RESTORE THE CJ IFTHEKHAR BUT WHAT IS REALITY WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING IT. MEDIA PEOPLE ARE REAL SCHOOL TO EDUCATE THE PEOPLE ON MERIT AND I OBSERVED MEDIA PEOPLE 99% ARE HUMANE, HUMAN.AS PROOF I CAN SAY THAT WHAT TYPE OF DIFFICULTIES MEDIA PEOPLE FACED LIKE HAMID MIR ,KAMRAN KHAN AND OTHERS BUT THEY DID NOT USE LANGUAGE LIKE IMRAN KHAN AND LIKE OTHERS WHO ARE INSTIGATING TO PEOPLE FOR ROIT AGAINST THE PAKISTAN. PLEASE YOU SHOULD PRESENT EACH EVERY THING BUT WITH POSITIVE NEGATIVE ASPECT NOT AS NOT FINALISED DECISION.
1.BENZIR SHAHEED PROMISE WAS BEFORE ELECTION AND AFTER ELECTION PEOPLE VERDICET CAME AGAINST THE JUDGES ISSUE 50 SEATS GOT Q LEAGUE.
2. FULL SUPPORTIVE PARTY MUSLIM LEAGUE N LOST THE ELECTION NOT BECAME AS LARGEST PARTY .AND ALSO DID NOT GIVE VOTE THREE SMALL PROVINCES TO MUSLIM LEAGE PARTY N.

3. MQM ALSO AGAINST THE CJ IFTHEKAR CH.
4. ADVOCATES ALSO GOT DEFEET FORM PEOPLE AND PEOPLE PARTICIPATED IN ELECTION NOT BY COTTED.
5 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE CECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.
6 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.

THIS WAS GREAT VERDICT OF PEOPLE AGAINST THE CH IFTHEKAHAR. AND AFTER ELECTION BENZIR SHAHEED COUD NOT GO AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE. AND ANY PUBLIC PROMISE CAN NOT BE FULFILLED AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE.
7 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE DECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.
8 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.
AS ALL JUDGES SUPPORTERS HAVE SAID.
PLEASE PUPLISH MY VIEW IN YOUR ARTICLE AS LETTER WRITTEER IT WILL BE JUSTICE WITH THE PAKISTAN AND PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN.

1 CJ SAIB REFUSED TO ATTEND 23 MARCH PRESIDENT CEREMONY DUE DO SHOWIN THAT HE IS NOT INVOLVED IN CURRPTION BUT MEETING WITH SAFDAR ABBASI PPP LEADER IS NOT CURRPRION
POLITICAL ADVOCATE ETHZAZ MEETING AND DICTATION IS NOT CURRPTION.
PLEASE CHECK AND SEE WRONG IS WRONG NO POSITIVE RESULT IN FUTURE IT IS NATURE RULE THAT PAST IS THE BASE FORE FUTURE .

BENIZIR SHAHED PROMISE ABOUT CJ IFTHEKHAR CH AND VERDICT OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE IN ELECTION GAVE DECISSION AGAINST JUDGES RESTORATIOIN BY PPP.

WE ARE JUST SEEING NOT MENTIONING, OBSERVING ANY THING ON MERIT . SINCE LONG LONG TIME BENZIR PROMISE HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTENED THAT SHE PROMISTED TO RESTORE THE CJ IFTHEKHAR BUT WHAT IS REALITY WE ARE NOT CONSIDERING IT. MEDIA PEOPLE ARE REAL SCHOOL TO EDUCATE THE PEOPLE ON MERIT AND I OBSERVED MEDIA PEOPLE 99% ARE HUMANE, HUMAN.AS PROOF I CAN SAY THAT WHAT TYPE OF DIFFICULTIES MEDIA PEOPLE FACED LIKE HAMID MIR ,KAMRAN KHAN AND OTHERS BUT THEY DID NOT USE LANGUAGE LIKE IMRAN KHAN AND LIKE OTHERS WHO ARE INSTIGATING TO PEOPLE FOR ROIT AGAINST THE PAKISTAN. PLEASE YOU SHOULD PRESENT EACH EVERY THING BUT WITH POSITIVE NEGATIVE ASPECT NOT AS NOT FINALISED DECISION.
1.BENZIR SHAHEED PROMISE WAS BEFORE ELECTION AND AFTER ELECTION PEOPLE VERDICET CAME AGAINST THE JUDGES ISSUE 50 SEATS GOT Q LEAGUE.
2. FULL SUPPORTIVE PARTY MUSLIM LEAGUE N LOST THE ELECTION NOT BECAME AS LARGEST PARTY .AND ALSO DID NOT GIVE VOTE THREE SMALL PROVINCES TO MUSLIM LEAGE PARTY N.

3. MQM ALSO AGAINST THE CJ IFTHEKAR CH.
4. ADVOCATES ALSO GOT DEFEET FORM PEOPLE AND PEOPLE PARTICIPATED IN ELECTION NOT BY COTTED.
9 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE CECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.
10 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.

THIS WAS GREAT VERDICT OF PEOPLE AGAINST THE CH IFTHEKAHAR. AND AFTER ELECTION BENZIR SHAHEED COUD NOT GO AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE. AND ANY PUBLIC PROMISE CAN NOT BE FULFILLED AGAINST THE VERDICT OF PEOPLE.
11 45 JUDGES WERE NOT CURRPT AND THEY FELT AND OBSERVED THE DECISION OF PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND GAVE FULL HOUOUR TO PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND TOOK OTHE AGAIN UNDER THE DECOMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.
12 45 JUDGES ARE IN MAJORITY ARE 3 JUDGES. BECAUSE THOSE 45 WERE HONEST AND ALSO AGAINST THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.
AS ALL JUDGES SUPPORTERS HAVE SAID.
PLEASE PUPLISH MY VIEW IN YOUR ARTICLE AS LETTER WRITTEER IT WILL BE JUSTICE WITH THE PAKISTAN AND PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN.

I totally agree with you and support Mai Jori

At this stage Pakistan need friends not masters. This country has been damaged by Literate people, then why don’t we give chance to Illiterate who at least understand the common problems when our feudal lords born with gold spoon have no idea about issues of a common country men.
And yes, if Mai Jori’s supporters do know that they are supporting a Positive change not Mai Jori. And if she goes to parliament at least she can spend the funds to the real deserving people instead of buying property and sending the money to Swiss banks.
If Pakistan can be run by thump-stamper leaders then why not by Mai Jori?
It is a positive change we should support although we cant travel all the way to Baluchistan but yes we can support this idea