<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>TeleFrieden</title><description>A provocative, unsponsored assessment of current legal, regulatory, marketplace, and cultural issues affecting telecommunications and information policy presented by Rob Frieden, Pioneers Chair and Professor of Telecommunications and Law, Penn State University</description><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>119</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Telefrieden" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelefrieden" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelefrieden" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelefrieden" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/Telefrieden" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelefrieden" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelefrieden" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelefrieden" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-5392923919326465199</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-23T12:18:20.753-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">network management</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FCC jurisdiction</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">network neutrality</category><title>Summary of FCC's Rulemaking on Net Neutrality and Preserving the Open Internet</title><atom:summary>Consistent with President Obama’s campaign promise to support network neutrality, the FCC has issued a broad sweeping Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to codify the four Internet principles adopted by the Commission in 2005[1] along with two additional principles requiring nondiscrimination and transparency. [2] With the two Republican Commissioners dissenting in part and concurring in </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/10/summary-of-fccs-rulemaking-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/Og3FoYMkheE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-2868653167913289435</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-15T14:27:12.604-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">regulatory arbitrage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless video</category><title>New Pub: Lock Down on the Third Screen: How Wireless Carriers Evade Regulation of Their Video Services</title><atom:summary>The latest Berkeley Technology Law Journal (Vol. 24, No. 2 819-849 Spring, 2009) has published my work on wireless video regulatory issues.Here's the abstract:Wireless handsets increasingly offer subscribers a new option for accessing the Internet and video programming.  The converging technologies and markets that make this possible present a major regulatory quandary, because the Federal </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/10/new-pub-lock-down-on-third-screen-how.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/HhQKPcSvgH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-8281458361621440661</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-14T13:33:13.086-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Disinformation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">WSJ Does Not Get It</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless network neutrality</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">network neutrality</category><title>WSJ’s Misinformation Agenda</title><atom:summary>Year after year I read Wall Street Journal editorials and op eds on telecommunications with wonder.  How can seemingly intelligent people—who generally write with great confidence bordering on arrogance—make such bold and wrong assertions nearly every time?  Is there a News Corp./Murdoch agenda?  Do these writers reflectively rail against any governmental intrusion?  Are they leading the blocking</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/10/wsjs-misinformation-agenda.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/2QxS1238ifY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-6941391027129852300</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-12T09:20:41.086-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">spectrum auctions</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">walled gardens</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">network neutrality</category><title>The Front-end and Back-End Effects of Spectrum Auction Open Access Commitments</title><atom:summary>AT&amp;T and others have noted that when a spectrum auction bidder must commit to using the bandwidth for an open and nondiscriminatory network, the bidder reduces its maximum monetary offer.  From this discounting, opponents to open access and network neutrality would have you believe that such principles impose quantifiable financial burdens, a kind of regulatory canopy that results in lost </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/10/front-end-and-back-end-effects-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/5YR5u0fs-lo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-657140928667739056</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-01T15:08:51.238-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Google Voice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">regulatory arbitrage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">information service</category><title>The Regulatory Arbitrage Lovefest</title><atom:summary>My day job, which includes finishing a book, updating a broadband law treatise, and trying to engage undergraduate students in the challenges of telecommunication and Internet policy, prevents me from weighing in each time I see yet another outrageous claim on such issues as network neutrality, broadband market penetration, and the competitiveness of U.S. telecoms markets. But I have to make time</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/10/regulatory-arbitrage-lovefest.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/bvOkBsEG8ss" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-7691568294914188034</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-01T11:31:00.641-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FCC jurisdiction</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">handset exclusivity</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless</category><title>Does the FCC Have Jurisdiction to Regulate Wireless Handsets?</title><atom:summary>As the FCC launches a number of inquiries into the wireless marketplace, some opponents to such scrutiny have raised the argument that the FCC has no legal basis for regulating wireless handsets, much less interfere with exclusive distribution agreements.  This strategy does inject fear, uncertainty and doubt possibly leading to the argument that regulatory uncertainty constitutes the  sole basis</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/09/does-fcc-have-jurisdiction-to-regulate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/EZ_b8vGC580" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-6454040905232697988</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-30T11:40:09.025-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">telecommunications policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">politics</category><title>Making a Mark in Telecom Policy: The 3PI Rule</title><atom:summary>With over thirty years experience in trying to influence U.S. federal telecommunications policy making, I can offer insights about the process that have passed the test of time. The 3PI Rule applies equally regardless of presidential administration and political party notwithstanding the wishful thinking of some about a “brand new day.”  While I am using trite phrases, I might as well add this </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/08/making-mark-in-telecom-policy-3pi-rule.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/aK93orkflEc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-7960100245743682591</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-28T21:18:26.710-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">market penetration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cable television</category><title>FCC 30% Cap on Cable Operator Market Penetration Vacated</title><atom:summary>The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the FCC's 30% cap on national market penetration by a single cable operator. Look for Comcast and Time Warner to acquire more operators and market share. Whether this consolidation will harm consumers depends on the cross-elasticity of alternative services including DBS, IPTV, and telephone company provided video services. It also depends on whether </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/08/further-cable-television-market.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/7DVviLIWNew" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-1178749297282348025</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-11T14:28:17.183-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">broadband statistics</category><title>Law Review Article on U.S. Broadband Statistics</title><atom:summary>Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics: Developing a Clearer Assessment of Market Penetration and Broadband Competition in the United States is available at:http://www.vjolt.net/vol14/issue2/v14i2_100%20-%20Frieden.pdf.Here's the abstract:This paper examines United States broadband penetration and pricing statistics with a critical eye, in light of other contradictory compilations by organizations other </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/08/law-review-article-on-us-broadband.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/rRRcmlOsefQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-3164731340550389851</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-02T16:57:39.947-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">regulatory status</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Google Voice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless</category><title>Some Unsolicited Advice for AT&amp;T re Google Voice</title><atom:summary>The FCC has posed a number of provocative questions to AT&amp;T regarding the fact that iPhone subscribers cannot download and use the Google Voice application. See http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/01/technology/companies/01google.html  AT&amp;T should stifle every motivation to play cute or clever with the FCC. Apple adopted such a strategy when it suggested to the Library of Congress and others that it </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/08/some-unsolicited-advice-for-at-re.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/DC7iemhdIw0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-4626932597042585713</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-31T14:34:31.101-04:00</atom:updated><title>Revealing the Inner Geek: E Layer Skip</title><atom:summary>During a tortuous 10 hour family drive the ionosphere sparkled.  More specifically a layer of the ionosphere became more agitated and dense than usual—matching my mental state.  With density this part of the atmosphere, approximately 65 miles above earth, reflected certain radio signals that normally pass through it.The FM radio band became active with distant signals coming in strong from up to </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/07/revealing-inner-geek-e-layer-skip.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/Otge_sfFuTE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-8971618994929265652</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-23T14:54:04.299-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">VoIP</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">universal service funding</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">information services</category><title>The Google Telephone Company?</title><atom:summary>Google has undertaken a beta-test of a telephony platform that includes the opportunity to route incoming calls to multiple devices and telephone numbers as well as free domestic long distance service.  See http://www.google.com/googlevoice/about.html.Google offers a service that fits somewhere between computer-to-computer, Internet telephony and Voice over the Internet Protocol telephony with </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/07/google-telephone-company.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/TY-bw18PdjI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-442431263208079248</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-13T14:00:05.502-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless freedom</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless Carterfone</category><title>Response to Questions from Senator Udall</title><atom:summary>Following up on the Senate Commerce Committee's hearing on wireless handset policy, Senator Tom Udall posed additional questions. My answers are available at: http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/m/rmf5/ (in the section entitled Testimony on the Consumer Wireless Experience).</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/07/response-to-questions-from-senator.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/jZhJ4Zf786M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-8585069228537168890</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-09T16:48:26.105-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless freedom</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">handset subsidies</category><title>Why Is Your Smart Phone Is So Stupid?</title><atom:summary>Brian Caulfield of Forbes magazine wrote a short piece posing the question: Why Is Your Smart Phone Is So Stupid?  See http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/08/iphone-ericsson-mobile-intelligent-technology-iphone.html?partner=telecom_newsletter.  He answers the question by reporting that the carriers disable the handsets in an attempt to prevent revenue drainage which would occur, for example, if iPhone </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/07/why-is-your-smart-phone-is-so-stupid.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/eDMQ6V4S5yg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-675527857780778480</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-08T12:17:22.109-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless freedom</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wall Street Journal does not get it</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless Carterfone</category><title>WSJ Editorial on Wireless Handset Exclusivity</title><atom:summary>The Wall Street Journal has extended its record for knee jerk corporate boosterism and extreme snarkiness, this time rejecting any need to scrutinize the wireless industry. Seehttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB124692981354203419.html. The Journal waxes poetic about the competitiveness and innovativeness of the industry, but surprisingly reports in its editorial that the top four wireless carriers </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/07/wsj-editorial-on-wireless-handset.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/FobdPSQTEvs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-5919158047056147109</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-30T14:12:23.204-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">handset freedom</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless Carterfone</category><title>Response to Questions From Senator Snowe</title><atom:summary>Following up on the Senate Commerce Committee's hearing on wireless handset policy, Senator Olympia Snowe posed additional questions.  My answers are available at: http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/m/rmf5/ (in the section entitled Testimony on the Consumer Wireless Experience).</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/06/response-to-questions-from-senator.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/rM0Fd_1Zkwc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-7995002721104103356</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-24T14:59:18.651-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">safe harbor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">First Amendment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ISPs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">network neutrality</category><title>New Work in Progress</title><atom:summary>I have completed a draft of a paper that examines how Internet Service Providers claim First Amendment speaker rights even as they also claim to operate as neutral conduits. By claiming to operate as conduits, ISPs can secure “safe harbor” exemption from tort and copyright liability.I argue that current media models provide inconsistent and incomplete direction on how to consider ISPs’ joint </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/06/new-work-in-progress.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/uKjiCAmKOqI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-3666274357498154067</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-19T09:46:49.207-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless Carterfone</category><title>Testimony on the Consumer Wireless Experience</title><atom:summary>The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing that examined wireless handset exclusivity, as well as limitations on consumers' access to functions available from wireless devices, and downloadable software applications. While no one disputed the likelihood that smart phones will increasingly operate like small personal computers. However, wireless subscribers do not have the same freedom to attach</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/06/testimony-on-consumer-wireless.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ue2n2C4inrw/SjuVvZo_pNI/AAAAAAAAABE/NDIABTeiiLg/s72-c/Senate+Commerce.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/5wCkuv6zsEE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-2682575655690860821</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-10T15:25:38.725-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">regulatory arbitrage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless video</category><title>Another Work in Progress--Lock Down on the Third Screen: How Wireless Carriers Evade Regulation of Their Video Services</title><atom:summary>Set out below is the abstract for another work in progress that considers whether wireless carriers should evade regulation of their "third screen" video services.  The paper will appear in a future edition of the Berkeley Technology Law Journal; a darft version is available at:  http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=102928Wireless handsets increasingly offer subscribers a new </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/06/another-work-in-progress-lock-down-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/hBLIeLl6zrY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-807968382166349185</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-10T15:17:30.441-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">broadband statistics</category><title>Work in Progress-Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics: Developing a Clearer Assessmentof Market Penetration and Broadband Competition in the United States</title><atom:summary>Set out below is the abstract for a current work in progress on the dodgy world of broadband market penetration data collection. The work will appear in an upcoming edition of the Virginia Journal of Law and Technology. A current draft is available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=102928Depending on the source one can conclude that United States consumers enjoy access </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/06/work-in-progress-lies-damn-lies-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/O-o8NyzPJ2U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-2125416162155158469</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-05T09:03:12.420-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">universal service reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">universal service</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cost allocation</category><title>Distance Is Not Dead or Cost Free</title><atom:summary>In 1997, Frances Cairncross wrote a book entitled The Death of Distance (Harvard Business School Press) that heralded the Internet’s ability to transcend and mitigate much of the financial and logistical challenges posed by geography. Certainly the Internet enhances productivity and opportunities, particularly for people in remote places. But what make distance less significant is the product of </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/05/distance-is-not-dead-or-cost-free.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/WV0rWxrl2Ug" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-6863080799765534753</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-14T14:24:13.461-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">common carrier</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">information services</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless</category><title>Carriers That Can Say No</title><atom:summary>Recently several press accounts reported that AT&amp;T will allow iPhone subscribers to access Skype’s Voice Over the Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) telephone service via wi-fi, but not using the AT&amp;T wireless network. See, e.g., http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-04-01-att-skype-iphone_N.htm.   Unlike some carriers that disable wi-fi access via cellphones, AT&amp;T could not block Apple’s interest in </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/04/carriers-that-can-say-no.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/6l6y-wrnwII" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-5038273676630662730</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-31T09:09:32.798-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wireless Carterfone</category><title>Skype Jailbreak and the Unholy Alliance of Wireless Handset Makers and Carriers</title><atom:summary>News of conditional iPhone Skype access has arrived; see http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/fring-for-the-iphone-all-skype-no-gripe/?pagemode=print.  I use the word conditional, because iPhone users can access the service only via a Wi-Fi connection and not via the AT&amp;T network.This announcement provides both good and bad news.  On one hand, Apple the computer manufacturer recognizes </atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/03/skype-jailbreak-and-unholy-alliance-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/6V_26bJnLaE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-3463803245828669177</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-18T13:14:30.735-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">unbundling</category><title>Unbundling in Canada</title><atom:summary>It appears that the incumbent wireline carriers in Canda use the same strategy as incumbent carriers in the U.S., i.e., play the investment disincentive card by threatening to delay or abandon infrastructure investment, coupled with a Constitutional claim of property confiscation.  The current economic crisis supports an additional adverse impact to employment gambit.  See Telecom TV, Can't share</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/03/unbundling-in-canada.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/xD-QpQY8zCw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8518538516094111151.post-6768045429638403860</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-26T13:06:57.302-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">competition</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">predatory pricing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">antitrust</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">price squeeze</category><title>Supreme Court Further Limits Antitrust Remedies for Carrier Pricing Complaints</title><atom:summary>By a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court has further reduced the opportunity for a carrier competitor of an incumbent to seek an FCC or judicial remedy to pricing strategies arguably designed to eliminate competition by offering wholesale prices below that charged to competitors for similar services. [1] In 2003 several Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) filed suit against Pacific Bell Telephone</atom:summary><link>http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2009/02/supreme-court-further-limits-antitrust.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob Frieden)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telefrieden/~4/_UN-cSbufEI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
